Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Screening and Diagnosis of
Diabetes Mellitus during
Pregnancy Prof Recep Has
Istanbul University
ObampGyn and Perinatology
Controversies in Gestational Diabetes
bull Screen or not
bull Selective or universal screening
bull One or two step testing
bull Criteria for diagnosis
bull Criteria for the use of insulin
bull Role of oral hypoglycaemic drugs
Diabetes in Pregnancy
bull Prevalence 3-14
bull Predisposition to Type 2
DM
ndash 50 gt type 2 DM
bull Recurrence in future
pregnancies 30-84
Gestational diabetes
Diabetes diagnosed first time
in pregnancy
bull15-20 pregestational
bullMore complications
bullScreening at first visit (B) Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Epidemiology
Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy 6-7
of GDM 90
O Total
GDM
Type 2
Type 1
Hyperglicemia
Shoulder dystocia
LGA
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Controversies in Gestational Diabetes
bull Screen or not
bull Selective or universal screening
bull One or two step testing
bull Criteria for diagnosis
bull Criteria for the use of insulin
bull Role of oral hypoglycaemic drugs
Diabetes in Pregnancy
bull Prevalence 3-14
bull Predisposition to Type 2
DM
ndash 50 gt type 2 DM
bull Recurrence in future
pregnancies 30-84
Gestational diabetes
Diabetes diagnosed first time
in pregnancy
bull15-20 pregestational
bullMore complications
bullScreening at first visit (B) Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Epidemiology
Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy 6-7
of GDM 90
O Total
GDM
Type 2
Type 1
Hyperglicemia
Shoulder dystocia
LGA
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Diabetes in Pregnancy
bull Prevalence 3-14
bull Predisposition to Type 2
DM
ndash 50 gt type 2 DM
bull Recurrence in future
pregnancies 30-84
Gestational diabetes
Diabetes diagnosed first time
in pregnancy
bull15-20 pregestational
bullMore complications
bullScreening at first visit (B) Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Epidemiology
Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy 6-7
of GDM 90
O Total
GDM
Type 2
Type 1
Hyperglicemia
Shoulder dystocia
LGA
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Diabetes in Pregnancy
Epidemiology
Albrecht SS 2010
Diabetes in Pregnancy 6-7
of GDM 90
O Total
GDM
Type 2
Type 1
Hyperglicemia
Shoulder dystocia
LGA
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Hyperglicemia
Shoulder dystocia
LGA
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Why Diagnose and Treat GDM
Mother Fetus Newborn Childhood
Addult
Dystosia Macrosomia RDS Obesity
CS Shoulder dystocia
and nerve injury
Hypoglicemia Type II diabetes
Preeclampsia Cardiomyopathy Hypocalcemia Metabolic
syndrome
Type II diabetes Preterm delivery Hyperbilirubinemia
Metabolic
syndrome
Policytemia
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
What happened in recent years with
gestational diabetes
bull Studies showed thatndash mild hyperglicemia have adverse effects on pregnancy results
ndash and treatment is beneficial
bull One step screening with 75 gr OGTT is recommended(IADPSG)
bull Oral antidiabetics are in use
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Studies
bull HAPO Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomesndash HAPO Study N Engl J Med 20083581991
bull ACHOIS Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesndash Crowther CA et al N Engl J Med 20053522477
bull MFMUN A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetesndash Landon MB et al N Engl J Med 20093611339
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
HAPO
ndash NEJM 2008
ndash Prospective blinded
ndash Multicenter different etnic groups
bull 25505 women
bull 24 ndash 32 w 75 gr GTT
ndash Exclusion
Fasting gt105 mgdL or
2 h ge200 mgdL or
Random ge160 mgdL
bull Aim
ndash To investigate maternal mild
hyperglicemia related
pregnancy risks
bull Fasting glucose levels divided 7 groups (5 mgdl intervals)
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes
Increases Along Continuum
Metzger BE et al Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
HAPO-Result
bull With increasing glocose
levelsndash Birth weight
ndash Cord C-Peptid levels
ndash CS
ndash Neonatal
bull Hypoglicemia
bull Subcutaneus adipous tissue
ndash Complications are increasing
bull There is no critical
treshold
ndash Biological condition
ndash Definition of GDM is
difficult
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
ACHOISEffect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomesCrowther CA N Engl J Med 2005 Jun 16352(24)2477-86 Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Screenig 75 g (Cases with a fasting 105-WHO criteria interval are included)
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
MFMUN-GDM
bull 24-31 wndash 50 g+100 g OGTT
ndash Fastinglt95 mg
bull Randomizationndash 485 case (Diet + insulin if needed)
ndash 473 control
bull Primary resultsndash fetal or perinatal death
ndash birth trauma
ndash neonatal complications
bull Results
bull Composit resultsndash 324 vs 370 (p 014)ndash No perinatal death
bull Birth weightndash 3302 vs 3408 g (p 0001)
bull LGA ndash 71 vs 145 (p 0001)
bull Shoulder dystociandash 15 vs 40 (p 002)
bull CSndash 269 vs 338 (p 002)
bull PIHndash 86 vs 136 (p 001)
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes Mark B Landon N Engl J Med 2009 October 1 361(14) 1339ndash1348 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
GDM Screening
bull Universal
ndash Endocrine Society 2013
ndash ACOG 2011
ndash ADA 2011
ndash SOGC 2002
ndash AACE 2007
ndash WHO 1999
bull Risk based
ndash NICE 2008
ndash US Preventive Task Force 2008
bull (2013) now recommends
universal screening
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
GDM Screening Based on Risk Assessment
Risk category Recommendation
High riskObesity Strong family history of type 2 diabetes Previous history of GDMImpaired glucose metabolism or glucosuria Ethnic group with a low prevalence of GDMAge ge35 yearsPolycystic ovarian syndromeAcanthosis nigricans
Testing as soon as feasable and
Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Moderate risk Testing at 24 to 28 weeks
Low riskEthnic group with a low prevalence of GDM No known diabetes in first-degree relatives Age lt 25 years Weight normal before pregnancy Weight normal at birth No history of abnormal glucose metabolism No history of poor obstetrical outcome
Testing not routinely required
NICE
US Preventive Services Task
Force
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
GDM ScreeningAll Women
bull First visit bull 24-28 w
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
US Preventive Task Force 2013
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
First visitFasting HbA1c Random PG
Fasting ge126 mgdL
HbA1c ge65
Random PG ge200 mgdL
Overt Diabetes
Fasting ge92lt126 mgdL
GDM
Fasting lt92 mgdL
HbA1c lt65
PG lt200 mgdL
24 ndash 28 w
screening
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Screening24-28 weeks
bull Two Step
ndash 50g
ndash 100g or 75g OGTT
bull One step
ndash 100 or 75g OGTT
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Two step
1H PG 140 135 130
Sensitivity 79 98 100
Specificity 87 80 78
Positive test 13 20 22
50 g
Plasma glucose (mgdl)
National Diabetes
Data Group (1979)1
The Fourth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes2
Fasting 105 95
1h 190 180
2h 165 155
3h 145 140
100 g OGTT
1 National Diabetes Group 1979
2 Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 1998
GDM 3-8
2 ge values
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
One Step-75 g OGTT
Abnorm
Result
Plasma glucose level (mgdl) Prevalance()
CDA gt2 F 95 1 h 190 2h 160 79
EASD gt1 F 108 2 h 162 97
ADA gt2 F 95 1 h 180 2 h 155 106
NZSSD gt1 F 99 2 h 162 176
WHO gt1 F 126 2 h 140 196
ADIPS gt1 F 99 2 h 144 249
ADA American Diabetes Association ADIPS Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society CDA
Canadian Diabetes Association EASD European Association for the Study of Diabetes NZSSD
New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes WHO World Health Organization
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Diabetes Care 201022676-682
IADPSG
June 2008 Pasadena California
225 conferees from 40 countries reviewed (HAPO) study
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
HAPO Incidence of Adverse Outcomes for
Glucose Categories (OR 175 or 20 )
Metzger BE et al HAPO NEJM 2008358(19)1991-2002
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
IADPSG Kriterleri
Coustan DR Paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for GDM 2010
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
HAPO
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
One step
Plasma Glucose
Fasting 92 mgdl
1 h 180 mgdl
2 h 153 mgdl
75 G OGTT
GDM 161
Single value
IADPSG 2010
ADA 2012
ES 2013
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Obesity and diabetes in USA
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
South East Asia amp Pacific RegionNauru 78Tonga 70Samoa 63Niue 46French Polynesia 44
AfricaSeychelles 28South Africa 28Ghana 20 Mauritania 19Cameroon (urban) 14
South Central AmericaPanama 36Paraguay 36Peru (urban) 23Chile (urban) 23Dominican Republic 18
North AmericaUSA 33Barbados 31Mexico 29St Lucia 28Bahamas 28
Eastern MediterraneanJordan 60Qatar 45Saudi Arabia 44Israel 43Lebanon 38
European RegionAlbania 36Malta 35Turkey 29Slovakia 28Czech Republic 26
Obese
0-99
10-149
15-199
20-249
25-299
ge30
Obesityndash Global prevalance
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Diabesity epidemy 2000 and 2030
Hossain et al NEJM 2007
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
TURDEP I and II studies in Turkey
bull DM and Obesity in 12 years12
ndash DM 90 increased
ndash DM age 5 years earlier
ndash Women 6 kg amp Men 8 kg increased
- Obesity 40 increased (223 312)
19982010
D M Prevalance ()
0
5
10
15
137
72
90
TURDEP I and II 1998 and 2010 population based cross sectional n 24788
1 Satman İ TURDEP Group Diabetes Care 2002251551-6
2 Satman İ Dinccag N TURDEP-II Group 33 Natıonal Congress of Endocrinology 12-16 Oct 2011 Antalya
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
Istanbul Medical FacultyGDM prevalance
Year Deliveries GDM GDM
Prevalance ()
1996- 1998 9544 227 2
1999- 2004 16007 688 43
2005- 2010 12579 732 58
N Dinccedilccedilağ R Has et al 6th International Symposium on Diabetes and Pregnancy 24-26 March Salzburg-Austria 2011
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
CONCLUSIONGDM SCREENING 2015 All Women
bull First visitndash Standart methods
bull Fasting
bull HbA1C
bull Random
(Level B evidence)
bull 24-28 w
ndash Two stepbull 50 and 100mg or
ndash One stepbull 75 gr GTT
bull gt92180153
IAPDPSG 2010 ADA 2011
Standarts of Medical Care in Diabetes Diabetes Care 2012
The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2013
Overt Diabetes (Type 1 or 2)Fasting ge126 mg dL or
HbA1C ge 65
Random plasma glucose ge200 mgdL
Gestational diabetesFasting ge 92 lt126 mgdL
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org
29 ndash 31 Ekim 2015 ndash Harbiye Askeri Muumlze
İstanbul
httpwwwtmftpultrason2015org