21
Development of a Product Category Rule for Roof Coatings Jessica Slomka PCR Program Operator, NSF International Benjamin Borns RCMA Sustainability Taskforce Co-Chair, The Sherwin-Williams Company Doug Mazeffa PCR Chairperson, The Sherwin-Williams Company

Development of a Product Category Rule for Roof Coatings · Three important acronyms • RCMA is developing a Product Category Rule (PCR) • A PCR is a roadmap for Life Cycle Assessment

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Development of a Product Category Rule for Roof CoatingsJessica SlomkaPCR Program Operator, NSF International

Benjamin Borns RCMA Sustainability Taskforce Co-Chair, The Sherwin-Williams Company

Doug MazeffaPCR Chairperson, The Sherwin-Williams Company

Agenda

Learning Objective: How and why is RCMA and the Roof Coatings Industry developing a Product Category Rule (PCR) for Roof Coatings?

1. Introduction – decoding the alphabet soup

2. The value of developing a Product Category Rule

3. The PCR Committees and development process

4. Discussion and review of the draft PCR

5. Next steps

6. Your questions

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 2

Three important acronyms

• RCMA is developing a Product Category Rule (PCR)

• A PCR is a roadmap for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

• The PCR template and results of an LCA are used to create an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 3

What is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)?

• Methodology to assess the environmental impact of products, technologies, materials, and/or services

• Mass balance of inputs/outputs across a system

• Uses Life Cycle Thinking

• Tracks multiple environmental indicators

• Considers functional equivalence

• Governed by ISO 14040, 14044, and 14025

• Used for benchmarking and comparison

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 4

Life Cycle Thinking

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 5

LCA and the Coatings Industry

Architectural Coatings PCR

ACA published PCR

May 2015

Increasing Demand for LCA

Requires PCR

LEED v4

Green Globes

LCA Data for Coatings

Improving

More accessible

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 6

RCMA Value Proposition

Apples to apples comparison

Credibility from 3rd part validation

Validated data on roof coatings benefits

Demand from users, specifiers, NGOs

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 7

Drivers of Demand for EPDs

LEED v4Green Globes

IGCCMajor

corporations

Architecture Firms

Contractors

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 8

Program OperatorProgram OperatorProgram OperatorProgram Operator

Committee Structure

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 9

NSF ensures compliance with NSF and ANSI procedural requirements for consensus-based PCR development (process, documentation, etc.)

Meeting and project facilitation support with PCR Committee Chair including management of external third-party review

NSF provides third-party verification of EPDs

RCMA Program Operator

Project Facilitation

EPD Verification

ANSI Approved Program Operator

Committee Structure – Program OperatorProgram OperatorProgram OperatorProgram Operator

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 10

Committee Structure – Drafting Team Drafting Team Drafting Team Drafting Team

• Small group

• LCA & Sustainability experts

• Responsible for • Drafting the LCA technical content

• Creating the starting document for the PCR Committee

• Provides regular updates to PCR Committee

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 11

Committee Structure – PCR CommitteePCR CommitteePCR CommitteePCR Committee

• Stakeholder consensus body

• Membership includes stakeholders from: • Industry

• Public health/regulatory

• Users

• Responsible for: • Reviewing document provided by the drafting team

• Providing feedback during comment period

• Officially votes on publishing the document

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 12

PCR TeamsCompleted

External ReviewIn-process

PCR PublicationPCR Review Completed

PCR Drafting Team & PCR Committee

develop, review, and approve

final PCR document

Internal member

review and public review are complete

Undergoing formal external review

Anticipated late Q3 of 2016

ACA PCRReferenced

Leverages ACA’s PCR

template for architectural

coatings

PCR Development StatusStatusStatusStatus

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 13

PCR Summary

Template: Architectural Coatings PCR

Inclusive: All types of roof

coatings

Design Life

Cradle to Grave Scope

Systems approach

Functional Unit

Based on current draft – under external review

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 14

PCR Summary – Cradle to Grave ScopeCradle to Grave ScopeCradle to Grave ScopeCradle to Grave Scope

• Considers – Resource Acquisition, Manufacturing, Packaging and Transport, Use, and Disposal

• Requires a framework to classify expected performance and durability to be created

• Ensures transparency in comparisons

Based on current draft – under external review

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 15

PCR Summary – Functional UnitFunctional UnitFunctional UnitFunctional Unit

The functional unit shall be 1m2 of covered and protected roofing membrane for a period of 20 years (the expected roof system lifespan extension provided by the coating).

• May require multiple coats or re-coats

• Includes the entire coating system needed to satisfy functional unit

20 year

10 year

10 year

+

Based on current draft – under external review

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 16

PCR Summary – Systems ApproachSystems ApproachSystems ApproachSystems Approach

• Roof coatings often designed as a system comprised of multiple layers

• An individual layer may not satisfy the functional unit

• Include the entire coating system needed to achieve full performance and coverage

Primers

Basecoats

Fabric / Mechanical Reinforcement

Topcoat

Based on current draft – under external review

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 17

PCR Summary – Design LifeDesign LifeDesign LifeDesign Life

• Lifespan to determine re-coats required to meet functional unit

• Developed through industry consensus and open comment period

• Based on ASTM standard specifications

• Provisions for hybrids and other types of coatings

Coating TypeTypical

Service Life

High

Performance

Service Life

Acrylic 7 years 15 years

Silicone 15 years 25 years

Asphaltic 3 years 7 years

Polyurethane 10 years 20 years

Aluminum 3 years 7 years

Based on current draft – under external review

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 18

Breakdown of Formal Comments

83 Total Comments from 11 groups

• ~45 - editorial/typographical edits

• ~15 - could not be changed given ISO 21930

• ~13 - LCA-specific adjustments. All minor

• 4 - General questions

• 3 - Clarification of product category

• 3 - Performance tests and/or lifetime suggestions

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 19

Date

Completed

Responsible

PartyActivity Milestone

Completed RCMA & NSF

Kick-off conference call with the Roof Coating Manufacturers Association to review development

schedule, identify potentially interested parties for outreach, and comments to initial draft PCR (as

applicable).

Completed Drafting TeamSeat PCR drafting team. NSF will provide teleconference arrangements for participants and a

demonstration of its Online Workspace and how it will be used to support PCR development.

Completed Drafting Team

Work with PCR drafting team to further develop the content of the draft PCR in accordance with ISO

14025 and ISO 21930. (Intermittently meet with full PCR committee to review the draft and solicit

feedback as needed)

CompletedCommittee

Transition PCR working draft to the full PCR Committee. Full PCR committee works to further develop the

technical content specific to the product.

June/July

(4 weeks)Review Panel NSF will submit the completed draft PCR for review by an independent PCR review panel.

July/August

(2 weeks)PCR Chair & NSF

The PCR Chair and NSF staff will manage and incorporate reviewer comments, as well as drafting

proposed language to resolve comments. The updated draft will be sent to the committee for review.

August

(2 weeks)Committee

Teleconference to review the independent PCR review panel’s comments and the PCR Chair & NSF’s

suggested revisions to resolve the comments.

September

(2 weeks)Committee Electronic ballot to approve the final PCR for publishing.

September

(2 weeks)NSF

Final editing of the PCR will be completed by NSF. The final PCR will be posted for public access.

Availability of the final PCR will be publicized through media releases, webinars, website postings, social

media, etc.

Maintenance

of the PCRNSF NSF will ensure the ongoing review and maintenance of the PCR at least once every five years.

Next Steps

July 19, 2016 2016 International Roof Coatings Conference 20

QUESTIONS?