Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1540
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AMOXICILLIN AND
CLAVULANATE BY USING LC-MS METHOD
B. Parijatha1*
, K. Anitha2, K. Prashanthi
1, D. Santhoshi Priya
1, K. Durga Prasad
2 and
Krishnamohan Chinnala1
1School of Pharmacy, Nalla Narasimha Reddy Education Society’s Group of Institutions,
Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
2Mother Theresa College of Pharmacy, NFC Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
ABSTRACT
A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-Mass spectroscopic
method was developed for monitoring plasma levels of Amoxicillin
and Clavulanate using Amoxicillin D4 as internal standard and
validated for applicability for pharmacokinetic studies. The extraction
of Amoxicillin and Clavulanate in human plasma involves solid phase
extraction. The samples were chromatographed on Kromasil 100-5 C18,
100mm, 4.6 mm, 5μm (Make: Akzonobel) column using a mobile
phase consisting of HPLC grade Acetonitrile:5mM Ammonium
Acetate (80:20, v/v), injection volume was 15μl, needle rinsing volume
was 1000μl and flow rate 1.000mL/min. The run time of sample was
2.20 minutes. Retention time for Clavulanate is 0.80 ± 0.5 minutes and
for Amoxicillin it is 0.80 ± 0.5 minutes. Detection of analytes was performed on LCMS
system in multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode by using API 4000 in negative mode.
The MS ion transitions monitored were 363.9→223.10 (product ion) for Amoxicillin, 198.00
(parent ion) → 135.80 (product ion) for Clavulanate, 368.00(parent ion) → 227.10(product
ion) for Amoxicillin D4. The linearity was obtained over concentration range of 153.596
ng/mL to 18034.104 ng/mL for Amoxicillin and 48.800 ng/mL to 5729.720 ng/mL for
Clavulanate.
KEYWORDS: Amoxicillin, Clavulanate, LC-MS method, Method development, Method
Validation.
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
SJIF Impact Factor 6.041
Volume 6, Issue 1, 1540-1554 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357
Article Received on
20 Nov. 2016,
Revised on 10 Dec. 2016,
Accepted on 31 Dec. 2016
DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20171-8445
*Corresponding Author
Dr. B. Parijatha
School of Pharmacy, Nalla
Narasimha Reddy
Education Society’s Group
of Institutions, Hyderabad,
Telangana, INDIA.
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1541
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
INTRODUCTION
Amoxicillin
Amoxicillin is a broad-spectrum semi synthetic antibiotic[1]
similar to ampicillin except that
its resistance to gastric acid permits higher serum levels with oral administration. Amoxicillin
is commonly prescribed with clavulanic acid (a beta lactamase inhibitor) as it is susceptible to
beta-lactamase degradation.
Figure.1: Molecular Structure of Amoxicillin.
Chemical Formula: C16H19N3O5S
IUPAC Name: 6-{[2-amino-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-acetyl] amino}-3, 3-dimethyl-7-oxo-4-
thia-1-azabicyclo [3.2.0] heptane-24-carboxylic acid
Molecular weight: 365.4
Physicochemical Properties
Solubility: Soluble in Methanol and Water.
Categories: Antibiotic
MECHANISM OF ACTION
Amoxicillin prevents cell wall synthesis by binding to enzymes called penicillin binding
proteins and concentration-independent bactericidal activity.
Clavulanic acid[2]
is a β-lactam structurally related to the penicillin’s and possesses the
ability to inactivate a wide variety of β-lactamase by blocking the active sites of these
enzymes.
Combination of Amoxicillin and Clavulanate potassium may prevent Amoxicillin
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1542
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Hydrolyzed by β-lactamase.
Clavulanate
History
Clavulanic acid is in the form its salts and esters. The acid is a suicide inhibitor of
bacterial beta-lactamase enzymes from Streptomyces clavuligerus.[3]
Administered alone,
it has only weak antibacterial activity against most organisms, but given in combination
with beta-lactam antibiotics prevents antibiotic inactivation by microbial lactamase.
Clavulanic acid is a β-Lactamase inhibitor combined with penicillin group antibiotics to
overcome certain types of antibiotic resistance.
Figure.2: Molecular Structure of Amoxicillin.
Chemical Formula C8H
9NO
5
IUPAC Name: 3-(2-hydroxyethylidene)-7-oxo-4-oxa-1-aza-bicyclo [3.2.0] heptane-2-
carboxylic acid.
Molecular weight : 199.16
Physicochemical Properties
Solubility: Soluble in Methanol and Water
Categories: β-Lactamase inhibitor
Half life : 1.0 hour
Mechanism of action
Clavulanate is a beta-lactam structurally related to the penicillin’s. Clavulanic acid is used in
conjunction[4]
with Amoxicillin for the treatment of bronchitis and urinary tract, skin, and soft
tissue infections caused by beta-lactamase producing organisms.
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1543
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Table 1: List of chemicals.
Reagents/Materials Manufacturer/Supplier
Methanol (HPLC grade) JT Baker
Ammonium acetate (AR grade) Merck
Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) JT Baker
HPLC grade water Rankem
Milli-Q water In house
Table 2: List of equipment.
S.No. Name of equipment Make Model
1 Analytical Balance Sartorius CPA2250
2 Micro Balance Sartorius SE-Z
3 Ph Meter Drjon 3 STAR
4 Reciprocating Shaker Orbitek SCIGENICS
5 Refrigerate Centrifuge Heraens MEGAFUSE20 R
6 Turbo Evaporator Zymark BE-TE-01
7 Positive processor Pressure Orochen SZYPRESS 48
8 HPLC MS-MS Shimadzu API 4000
Finalized Chromatographic Parameters
Column : Kromasil 100-5 C18, 100*4.6 mm, 5µm (Make: Akzonobel)
Mobile phase : HPLC grade Acetonitrile: 5mM ammonium acetate (80:20, v/v)
Diluent :HPLC grade Acetonitrile: Milli Q/HPLC grade water (60:40, v/v)
Rinsing solution : HPLC grade Acetonitrile: Milli Q water (60:40 v/v)
Flow rate : 1.0 mL/minute (with splitter)
Split : 50:50
Sample Cooler Temperature : 5°C
Column Oven Temperature : N/AP
Injection volume : 20 µl
Needle Rinsing Volume : 500 µl
Rinsing Mode : Before and after aspiration
Retention time : Amoxicillin 0.80 ± 0.5 minutes
: Clavulanate 0.80 ± 0.5 minutes
: Amoxicillin-d4 0.80 ± 0.5 minutes
Run Time : 2.20 minutes
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1544
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
a) 5mM Ammonium acetate (w/v) buffer
About 385.4 mg of ammonium acetate[6]
was transferred to a 1000 mL reagent bottle
containing 1000 mL of Milli Q/HPLC grade water. Mixed well and sonicated in an
ultrasonicator for 5 minutes. The buffer solution was stored at room temperature (20±5 °C)
and used within 4 days from the date of preparation.
b) Mobile Phase (20:80 v/v)
400 mL of 5mM ammonium acetate was transferred to a 2000 mL reagent bottle and 1600
mL of HPLC grade Acetonitrile was added to it. It was mixed well, sonicated in an
ultrasonicator for 5 minutes. The mobile phase was stored at room temperature (20±5 °C) and
used within 7 days from the date of preparation.
c) Diluent (v/v)
A mixture of HPLC grade Acetonitrile and Milli Q/HPLC grade water[7]
was prepared in the
volume ratio of 60:40 as diluent. It was then sonicated in an ultrasonicator for 5 minutes. The
diluent was stored at room temperature (20±5 °C) and used within 7 days from the date of
preparation.
d) Rinsing solution (v/v)
Diluent was used as rinsing solution.
Sample Preparation
The samples were thawed at room temperature and vortexed to ensure complete mixing of the
contents. 250 µl of the plasma sample was pipetted into 5 mL RIA[8]
vial tubes and 25 µl of
49848.608 ng/mL Amoxicillin-d4 dilutions was added to it and vortexed, except in blank
plasma samples where 25 µL diluent was added and vortexed. Then 1 mL of Acetonitrile was
added and vortexed. The samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. Then
supernatant layer was transferred to prelabelled auto sampler loading vials and injected.
Biological matrix
Eight lots of K2 -EDTA human plasma including one lipemic and one hemolytic plasma were
screened for selectivity test. All human plasma lots including hemolytic and lipemic plasma
were found free of any significant interference for Amoxicillin and Clavulanate and Internal
Standard. All the above screened plasma lots were pooled and used to prepare calibration
standards, quality control samples and DIQC samples.
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1545
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Selectivity test was performed before bulk spiking. After bulk spiking, aliquots of 400 µL for
CCs and 400 µl for QCs of spiked plasma samples were pipetted out into a prelabelled micro
centrifuge tubes and then all the bulk spiked samples were stored in deep freezer at –70 °C,
except twelve replicates each of LQC and HQC, which were stored in deep freezer at –20 °C
for generation of stability data at –20 °C.
Stock Solutions
Amoxicillin and Clavulanate Stock Solution
Weigh about 5.000 mg of Amoxicillin working standards separately and transfer to a 5 mL
clean volumetric flask and dissolve in Milli Q/HPLC grade water and the volume is made up
with the same to produce a solution of 1.000 mg/mL Similarly, weigh about 5.000 mg of
Clavulanate working standards separately and transfer to a 5 mL clean volumetric flask and
dissolve in Milli Q/HPLC grade water and the volume is made up with the same to produce a
solution of 1.000 mg/mL The stock solution was stored in refrigerator at 2 – 8 °C and used
for maximum of 6 days. The stock solution of Amoxicillin and Clavulanate were prepared
separately.
The stock solutions[10]
were diluted to suitable concentrations using a mixture of Acetonitrile
and Milli Q water (Diluent) in the ratio of (60:40 v/v) for spiking into plasma to obtain
calibration curve (CC) standards, quality control (QC) samples and DIQC samples. All other
final dilutions (system suitability test, aqueous mixture and recovery samples) were prepared
in mobile phase.
Amoxicillin D4 Stock Solution (Internal Standard)
Weigh about 2.000 mg of Amoxicillin-d4 working standards separately and transfer to a 2mL
clean volumetric flask, dissolve in Milli Q/HPLC grade water and the volume is made up
with the same to produce a solution of 1.000 mg/mL
The stock solution was stored in refrigerator at 2 – 8 °C and used for maximum of 6 days.
The stock solutions were diluted to suitable concentration using diluent for internal standard
dilution.
Calibration Curve Standards and Quality Control Samples
Calibration curve standard consisting of a set of nine non-zero concentrations ranging from
153.596 ng/mL to 18034.104 ng/mL of Amoxicillin and 48.800 ng/mL to 5729.720 ng/mL of
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1546
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Clavulanate were prepared. Prepared quality control samples consisted of concentrations of
154.417 ng/mL (LLOQ QC), 456.854 ng/mL (LQC), 1903.558 ng/mL (MQC1), 9064.563
ng/mL (MQC2), and 14620.263 ng/mL (HQC) for Amoxicillin and 48.845 ng/mL (LLOQ
QC), 144.512 ng/mL (LQC), 602.132 ng/mL (MQC1), 2867.295 ng/mL (MQC2), and
4624.670 ng/mL (HQC) for Clavulanate.
System Suitability Solution
A mixture of analytes and internal standard were prepared for system suitability test. The
system suitability test solution was injected as an aqueous mixture. Aqueous samples are
prepared as per recovery basis. 25 µl of each analyte (176853.195 ng/mL of Amoxicillin and
56203.312 ng/mL of Clavulanate) and 50 µl of combined dilution of internal standard
(49848.608 ng/mL of Amoxicillin-d4) were mixed with 2450 µl of mobile phase to prepare
the system suitability sample.
Mass spectroscopic conditions
MRM mode[9]
was used for detection of both analyte and IS as followed in table 1a various
mass spectrometric detection dependent parameters for Amoxicillin, Clavulanate and IS were
selected as mentioned in table 1b.
Table.3a: MRM modes for analytes and IS.
Analyte Parent ion (m/z) Product ion (m/z)
Amoxicillin 363.90 223.10
Clavulanate 198.00 198.00
Amoxicillin d4 368.00 227.10
Table.3b: Mass spectroscopic conditions for analyte and IS.
Parameter Amoxicillin Clavulanate Amoxicillin-d4
Ionization mode Negative Negative Negative
Detection m/z 363.90 (parent) and
223.10 (product)
198.00 (parent) and
135.80 (product)
368.00 (parent) and
227.10 (product)
Ion Spray Voltage (IS) -4600.00 V -4600.00 V -4600.00 V
Temperature (TEM0C) 550.00 550.00 550.00
Curtain Gas (CUR) 12.00 psi 12.00 psi 12.00 psi
Collision Gas (CAD) 8.00 psi 8.00 psi 8.00 psi
NEB 6.00 psi 6.00 psi 6.00 psi
Declustering Potential (DP) -35.00 V -13.00 V -13.00 V
Collision Energy (CE) -14.00 V -11.00 V -14.00 V
Collision Cell Exit Potential (CXP) -4.00 V -9.00 V -4.00 V
Focusing Potential (FP) -130.00 V -60.00 V -75.00 V
Entrance Potential (EP) -10.00 V -10.00 V -10.00 V
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1547
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Method development and optimization Linearity
A regression equation with a weighting factor of 1/ (concentration ratio)2 of drug to IS
concentration was judged to produce the best fit for the concentration-detector response
relationship for Amoxicillin and Clavulanate in human plasma. The representative
calibration curves for regression analysis are illustrated in Figure 3 & 4 for Amoxicillin and
Clavulanate, respectively. Correlation coefficient (r) was greater than 0.99 in the
concentration range of 153.596 ng/mL to 18034.104 ng/mL for Amoxicillin and 48.800
ng/mL to 5729.720 ng/mL for Clavulanate these results are given in the tables 2a, 2b and 2c.
Table.4a: Concentration-response Linearity Data for Amoxicillin.
AMCL Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)
STD-A STD-B STD-C STD-D STD-E STD-F STD-G STD-H STD-I
CC# 153.596 307.193 903.509 1807.017 3614.034 7228.069 10820.462 14427.283 18034.104
1 153.015 307.790 918.836 1804.766 3577.067 7523.901 10939.812 13838.119 17767.693
%
Accuracy 99.62 100.19 101.70 99.88 98.98 104.09 101.10 95.92 98.52
2 154.443 302.997 900.122 1832.155 3689.655 7318.908 10801.108 13913.049 18068.742
%
Accuracy 100.55 98.63 99.63 101.39 102.09 101.26 99.82 96.44 100.19
3 150.894 316.030 917.539 1843.927 3561.625 7110.350 10741.782 14266.660 18071.322
%
Accuracy 98.24 102.88 101.55 102.04 98.55 98.37 99.27 98.89 100.21
Mean 152.7840 308.9390 912.1657 1826.9493 3609.4490 7317.7197 10827.5673 14005.9427 17969.2523
S.D. 1.45805 5.38237 8.53260 16.40569 57.06351 168.83358 82.98210 186.87567 142.52786
C.V.% 0.95 1.74 0.94 0.90 1.58 2.31 0.77 1.33 0.79
%
Nominal 99.47 100.57 100.96 101.10 99.87 101.24 100.07 97.08 99.64
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Table 4b: Concentration-response Linearity Data for Clavulanate.
AMCL Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)
STD-A STD-B STD-C STD-D STD-E STD-F STD-G STD-H STD-I
CC# 48.800 97.600 287.059 574.118 1148.236 2296.472 3437.832 4583.776 5729.720
1 47.746 101.778 288.388 578.472 1110.925 2332.502 3446.773 4433.234 5807.736
%
Accuracy 97.84 104.28 100.46 100.76 96.75 101.57 100.26 96.72 101.36
2 49.177 97.102 277.994 575.015 1135.966 2320.732 3527.345 4382.886 5989.284
%
Accuracy 100.77 99.49 96.84 100.16 98.93 101.06 102.60 95.62 104.53
3 48.294 100.391 284.554 569.044 1098.001 2263.025 3433.551 4576.402 6076.441
%
Accuracy 98.96 102.86 99.13 99.12 95.63 98.54 99.88 99.84 106.05
Mean 48.4057 99.7570 283.6453 574.1770 1114.9640 2305.4197 3469.2230 4464.1740 5957.8203
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1548
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
S.D. 0.58952 1.96090 4.29170 3.89431 15.76009 30.36022 41.45142 81.97590 111.93172
C.V.% 1.22 1.97 1.51 0.68 1.41 1.32 1.19 1.84 1.88
%
Nominal 99.19 102.21 98.81 100.01 97.10 100.39 100.91 97.39 103.98
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Table.4c: Linearity values for Amoxicillin and Clavulanate.
AMCL Slope Intercept R r
2
CC#
1 0.0004 0.0004 0.9996 0.9992
2 0.0004 -0.0003 0.9995 0.9990
3 0.0004 0.0004 0.9995 0.9990
PA BATCH-1 AND SENSITIVITY.rdb (Amoxicillin): "Linear" Regression ("1 / (x * x)" weighting): y = 0.000199 x + 0.00204 (r = 0.9997)
1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0 6000.0 7000.0 8000.0 9000.0 1.0e4 1.1e4 1.2e4 1.3e4 1.4e4 1.5e4 1.6e4 1.7e4 1.8e4Analyte Conc. / IS Conc.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Analyte
Area / IS
Area
Figure 3: A Representative Calibration Curve for Regression Analysis of Amoxicillin
PA BATCH-1 AND SENSITIVITY.rdb (Clavulanate): "Linear" Regression ("1 / (x * x)" weighting): y = 0.000413 x + 0.000427 (r = 0.9996)
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500Analyte Conc. / IS Conc.
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.4
Analyte
Area / IS
Area
Figure 4: A Representative Calibration Curve for Regression Analysis of Clavulanate
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1549
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sensitivity
The lowest limit of reliable quantification for Amoxicillin and Clavulanate in human plasma
was set at the concentration of the LLOQ, 153.596 ng/mL and 48.800 ng/mL, respectively.
The precision and accuracy for Amoxicillin at this concentration was found to be 2.83%
88.41%. Similarly, the precision and accuracy for Clavulanate at this concentration was
found to be 3.46% and 91.77%. These results are given in the table 3a and 3b.
Table 5a: Within Batch Precision and Accuracy for Sensitivity of Amoxicillin.
-AMCL Nominal concentration
(ng/mL)
SEN-LLOQ 153.596 % Accuracy
1 132.020 85.95
2 142.591 92.84
3 137.610 89.59
4 135.036 87.92
5 134.464 87.54
6 133.616 86.60
Mean 135.7898
S.D 3.84182
C.V% 2.83
%Nominal 88.41
N 6
Table 5b: Within Batch Precision and Accuracy for Sensitivity of Clavulanate.
AMCL Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)
SEN- LLOQ 48.800 % Accuracy
1 43.773 89.70
2 46.979 96.27
3 44.578 91.35
4 45.654 93.55
5 42.509 87.11
6 45.218 92.66
Mean 44.7852
S.D 1.54942
C.V % 3.46
%Nominal 91.77
N 6
Auto sampler Stability
In assessing the auto sampler stability of Amoxicillin and Clavulanate, six sets of QC
samples (LQC and HQC) were processed and placed in the auto sampler.[12]
These samples
were injected after a period of 54 hours. Refer, Table 4a, 4b. Results demonstrate that the
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1550
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
processed samples were stable for 54 hours. The percent nominal of Amoxicillin ranged from
94.32% to 95.05% and the precision ranged from 1.32% to 1.81%. The percent nominal of
Clavulanate ranged from 104.00% to106.47% and the precision ranged from 2.50% to 4.22%.
Table 6a: Auto sampler Stability Data of Amoxicillin for 53 hours.
AMCL Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)
LQC HQC
QC# 456.854 % Accuracy 14620.263 % Accuracy
95 447.113 97.87 13938.522 95.34
96 429.983 94.12 13552.794 92.70
97 437.624 95.79 13635.386 93.26
98 425.598 93.16 13725.738 93.88
99 436.636 95.57 14024.834 95.93
100 428.546 93.80 13857.705 94.78
Mean 434.2500
13789.1632
S.D. 7.85027 182.25660
C.V. (%) 1.81 1.32
% Nominal 95.05 94.32
N 6 6
Table 6b: Auto sampler Stability Data of Clavulanate for 53 hours.
AMCL Nominal Concentration (ng/mL)
LQC HQC
QC# 144.512 % Accuracy 4624.670 % Accuracy
95 153.847 106.46 4773.819 103.23
96 152.581 105.58 4834.706 104.54
97 149.652 103.56 4891.427 105.77
98 137.840 95.38 5110.595 110.51
99 152.990 105.87 5020.525 108.56
100 154.826 107.14 4912.834 106.23
Mean 150.2893
4923.9843
S.D. 6.34312 123.16509
C.V.(%) 4.22 2.50
% Nominal 104.00 106.47
N 6 6
Data processing
The chromatograms were acquired and processed by peak area ratio method using the
Analyst 1.4.2 software. The concentration of the unknown was calculated from the following
equation using regression analysis of spiked standard with the reciprocal of the square of ratio
of the drug concentration to internal standard concentration as a weighting factor [1/
(concentration ratio) 2
].
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1551
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
y = mx + c
Where, y = peak area ratio of Amoxicillin/Clavulanate to respective internal standard
m = slope of the calibration curve
x = concentration ratio of Amoxicillin/Clavulanate to respective internal standard ng/mL
c = y-axis intercept of the calibration.
Sample Name: "Blank" Sample ID: "" File: "002.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin" Mass(es): "363.9/223.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Double Blank
Concentration: 0.000 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:21:50
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 20.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.752 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.79 min
Area: 1223 counts
Height: 1.76e+002 cps
Start Time: 0.666 min
End Time: 0.861 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
Inten
sity,
cps
Sample Name: "Blank" Sample ID: "" File: "002.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin-D4(IS)" Mass(es): "368.0/227.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Double Blank
Concentration: 1.00 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:21:50
Modified: No
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Inten
sity,
cps
0.78
0.88
2.05
Figure 5: Chromatogram of an Aqueous Standard and Internal Standard Mixture of
Amoxicillin
Sample Name: "AQM(MV-279-SST-03)" Sample ID: "" File: "001.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin" Mass(es): "363.9/223.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Unknown
Concentration: N/A
Calculated Conc: 9080.721 ng/mL
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:18:55
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 20.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.752 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.80 min
Area: 991100 counts
Height: 1.67e+005 cps
Start Time: 0.646 min
End Time: 1.01 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0.0
5000.0
1.0e4
1.5e4
2.0e4
2.5e4
3.0e4
3.5e4
4.0e4
4.5e4
5.0e4
5.5e4
6.0e4
6.5e4
7.0e4
7.5e4
8.0e4
8.5e4
9.0e4
9.5e4
1.0e5
1.1e5
1.1e5
1.2e5
1.2e5
1.3e5
1.3e5
1.4e5
1.4e5
1.5e5
1.5e5
1.6e5
1.6e5
1.7e5
Inte
nsity
, cps
0.80
Sample Name: "AQM(MV-279-SST-03)" Sample ID: "" File: "001.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin-D4(IS)" Mass(es): "368.0/227.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Unknown
Concentration: 1.00 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:18:55
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 25.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.746 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.79 min
Area: 547651 counts
Height: 9.36e+004 cps
Start Time: 0.636 min
End Time: 0.974 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0.0
5000.0
1.0e4
1.5e4
2.0e4
2.5e4
3.0e4
3.5e4
4.0e4
4.5e4
5.0e4
5.5e4
6.0e4
6.5e4
7.0e4
7.5e4
8.0e4
8.5e4
9.0e4
Inte
nsity
, cps
0.79
Figure 6: Chromatogram of Blank Plasma Sample of Amoxicillin.
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1552
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sample Name: "Blank+IS" Sample ID: "" File: "003.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin" Mass(es): "363.9/223.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Blank
Concentration: 0.000 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:24:45
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 20.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.752 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.78 min
Area: 1622 counts
Height: 2.62e+002 cps
Start Time: 0.666 min
End Time: 0.861 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
320
Inten
sity,
cps
0.78
0.89 0.97
1.05
1.17
1.301.61
1.471.41
1.750.38
1.97 2.17
Sample Name: "Blank+IS" Sample ID: "" File: "003.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin-D4(IS)" Mass(es): "368.0/227.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Blank
Concentration: 1.00 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:24:45
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 25.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.746 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.79 min
Area: 673657 counts
Height: 1.17e+005 cps
Start Time: 0.636 min
End Time: 0.974 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0.00
5000.00
1.00e4
1.50e4
2.00e4
2.50e4
3.00e4
3.50e4
4.00e4
4.50e4
5.00e4
5.50e4
6.00e4
6.50e4
7.00e4
7.50e4
8.00e4
8.50e4
9.00e4
9.50e4
1.00e5
1.05e5
1.10e5
1.15e5
Inten
sity,
cps
0.79
Figure 7: Chromatogram of Blank Plasma with Internal Standard Sample of
Amoxicillin.
Sample Name: "AQM(MV-279-SST-03)" Sample ID: "" File: "001.wiff"Peak Name: "Clavulanate" Mass(es): "198.0/135.8 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Unknown
Concentration: N/A
Calculated Conc: 2928.909 ng/mL
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:18:55
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 10.00 cps
Area Threshold: 100.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.741 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.80 min
Area: 662517 counts
Height: 1.04e+005 cps
Start Time: 0.636 min
End Time: 0.994 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0.00
5000.00
1.00e4
1.50e4
2.00e4
2.50e4
3.00e4
3.50e4
4.00e4
4.50e4
5.00e4
5.50e4
6.00e4
6.50e4
7.00e4
7.50e4
8.00e4
8.50e4
9.00e4
9.50e4
1.00e5
Inten
sity,
cps
0.80
Sample Name: "AQM(MV-279-SST-03)" Sample ID: "" File: "001.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin-D4(IS)" Mass(es): "368.0/227.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Unknown
Concentration: 1.00 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:18:55
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 25.00 cps
Area Threshold: 200.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.746 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.79 min
Area: 547651 counts
Height: 9.36e+004 cps
Start Time: 0.636 min
End Time: 0.974 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0.0
5000.0
1.0e4
1.5e4
2.0e4
2.5e4
3.0e4
3.5e4
4.0e4
4.5e4
5.0e4
5.5e4
6.0e4
6.5e4
7.0e4
7.5e4
8.0e4
8.5e4
9.0e4
Inten
sity,
cps
0.79
Figure 8: Chromatogram of an Aqueous Standard and Internal Standard Mixture of
Clavulanate.
Sample Name: "Blank" Sample ID: "" File: "002.wiff"Peak Name: "Clavulanate" Mass(es): "198.0/135.8 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Double Blank
Concentration: 0.000 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:21:50
Modified: No
Proc. Algorithm: Analyst Classic
Bunching Factor: 1
Noise Threshold: 10.00 cps
Area Threshold: 100.00 cps
Num. Smooths: 7
Sep. Width: 0.20
Sep. Height: 1.00
Exp. Peak Ratio: 5.00
Exp. Adj. Ratio: 4.00
Exp. Val. Ratio: 3.00
RT Window: 30.0 sec
Expected RT: 0.741 min
Use Relative RT: No
Int. Type: Base To Base
Retention Time: 0.73 min
Area: 402 counts
Height: 8.60e+001 cps
Start Time: 0.656 min
End Time: 0.830 min
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
Inte
nsity
, cps
Sample Name: "Blank" Sample ID: "" File: "002.wiff"Peak Name: "Amoxicillin-D4(IS)" Mass(es): "368.0/227.1 amu"Comment: "" Annotation: ""
Sample Index: 1
Sample Type: Double Blank
Concentration: 1.00 ng/mL
Calculated Conc: N/A
Acq. Date: 16/12/13
Acq. Time: 15:21:50
Modified: No
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Time, min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Inte
nsity
, cps
0.78
0.88
2.05
Figure 9: Chromatogram of Blank Plasma Sample of Clavulanate
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1553
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Limits of detection and quantification
The limit of detection (LOD) is defined as the lowest concentration of an analyte that can be
Readily detected but not necessarily quantified. It is usually regarded as the amount for which
the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 3:1. The limit of quantization (LOQ) is defined as the
lowest Concentration of an analyte that can A Representative Chromatogram of an Aqueous
Standard and Internal Standard Mixture of Clavulanate.
CONCLUSION
A high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method for the estimation of
Amoxicillin and Clavulanate in human plasma in negative ion mode was developed and
validated using Amoxicillin D4 as internal standard (IS). Sample preparation was
accomplished by Solid phase extraction technique. The reconstituted samples were
chromatographed on Kromasil 100-5 C18, 100*4.6 mm, 5µm (Make: Akzonobel) column
using a mobile phase consisting of HPLC grade Acetonitrile: 5mM ammonium acetate
(80:20, v/v). The method was validated over a concentration range of 153.596 ng/mL to
18034.104 ng/mL for Amoxicillin and 48.800 ng/mL to 5729.720 ng/mL for Clavulanate.
This validation report provides the results of selectivity, and sensitivity determinations,
calibration standards and quality control samples data, precision and accuracy data, the
results of recovery, various stabilities and dilution along with all pertinent supporting
documentation.
REFERENCES
1. Avinash Ghaikwad, Sumith Gavali et.al. An LC–MS–MS method for the simultaneous
quantification of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in human plasma and its
pharmacokinetic applications.” Journal of Pharmacy Research.” 2013; 6(8): 804–812.
2. Durga Mallikarjuna Roan Tippa* and Narendra Singh, Development and Validation of
Stability Indicating HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Amoxicillin and
Clavulanic Acid in Injection “American Journal of Analytical Chemistry”., 2010; 1:
95-101.
3. Chaitanya Krishna and Chelladurai, a novel and high-throughput method for the
simultaneous determination of amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid in human plasma by liquid
chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. International Journal of
Pharmacy and “Pharmaceutical Sciences”, 2012; 0975-1491.
www.wjpps.com Vol 6, Issue 01, 2017.
1554
Parijatha et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
4. Ajitha, A Thenmozhi*, D Sridhar an, V Rajamanickam1, Rapid and sensitive LCMS/MS
method for the simultaneous estimation of Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid in human
plasma. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 2010; 0974‐41.
5. Akhilesh Gupta, Rajkumar1, Swati Rawat2, Mayuri Gandhi3 and Rahul, Named.
Simultaneous estimation of amoxicillin and potassium Clavulanate in injection
formulation by simultaneous equation method and its validation Journal of” Pharmacy
Research., 2011; 4(4): 1244-1245.
6. Hartmann c, Smeyers-Verbeke, Massart DL, MC Dowel RD. Validation of Bioanalytical
chromatographic methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1998;
17(2): 193–218.
7. Roger Cousin, Validation of chromatographic methods in biomedical analysis view point
and discussion, “Journal of Chromatography” 1997; 175-180.
8. Bressolle, F, Bromet-pitit, M. & Audran, M, Validation of Liquid Chromatography and
Gas Chromatographic Methods Application to Pharmacokinetics, “Journal of
Chromatography” 1996; 3-10.
9. Bioanalysis by LC–MS/MS, “J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal”, 2007; 44(2): 342-355.
10. Howard Hill., “High throughput Bio analytical Sample Preparation Methods and
Automation Strategies", 1st Ed, 2009; 1(1): 116-209.
11. Jurgen J.G, John Willey & Sons, Chichester, “Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation
Interpretation and application”, 1st Ed, 2009; 216-389.
12. Stooge DA, Holler FJ, Crouch, “Principles of Instrumental Analysis”, 5th Ed, 1998;
550-55.