39
DEVELOPING A NETWORK OF CONTENT PROVIDERS: THE CASE OF ORGANIC.EDUNET Vassilis Protonotarios Agricultural Biotechnologist, PhD

Developing a network of content providers: The case of Organic.Edunet

  • Upload
    rimona

  • View
    23

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Developing a network of content providers: The case of Organic.Edunet. Vassilis Protonotarios Agricultural Biotechnologist, PhD Agro-Know Technologies, Greece. But First About Me. Vassilis is an Agronomist!. BSc, MSc, and PhD in Agricultural Biotechnology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

DEVELOPING A NETWORK OF CONTENT PROVIDERS:

THE CASE OF ORGANIC.EDUNET

Vassilis Protonotarios

Agricultural Biotechnologist, PhD

Agro-Know Technologies, Greece

Page 2: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

BUT FIRST ABOUT ME

Page 3: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

VASSILIS IS AN AGRONOMIST!

BSc, MSc, and PhD in Agricultural Biotechnology Agricultural University of Athens

Got involved with metadata during the Organic.Edunet eContentPlus project (2007-2009)

Working in various EU-funded projects, mostly supporting & coordinating curriculum development and content population Organic.Balkanet LdV project (2009-2011) CerOrganic LdV project (2009-2011) VOA3R ICT-PSP (2010-2013) Organic.Lingua ICT-PSP project (2011-2014)

Page 4: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

MAIN AREAS OF INTEREST

Management of collections Educational metadata Expansion of the Organic.Edunet network Dissemination

as well as Blogging Tweeting Cycling Taking photos

Page 5: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE ORGANIC.EDUNET NETWORK

Page 6: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

CONTENT ANALYSIS

Currently almost 11,000 resources available through Organic.Edunet

15 interconnected repositories from 13 countries

Resources appropriate for school & university level, as well as vocational education & training

Vast majority are web-based resources (websites)

Content available in 11 languages Metadata available in 16 languages; there

are metadata in 8 languages max.

Page 7: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET – THE CONTENT

Page 8: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET – THE PORTAL

Page 9: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET WEB PORTAL – THE STATS*

almost 11,000 available resources resources available in 11 languages

Metadata available in 8 languages for many of them

more than 152,000 visits from 192 countries

468,000 page views more than 124,000 unique visitors mostly new visitors / 75% search traffic

*01/01/2010 -1/12/2012

Page 10: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

AN EVOLVING NETWORK

Expansion of network in three phases so far

1.Phase 1: The Organic.Edunet project (2008-2010)

2.Phase 2: The related projects (2009-now)

3.Phase 3: The new collections and affiliated content providers (2010-now)

Page 11: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

PHASE 1 – THE ORGANIC.EDUNET PROJECT PARTNERS

Eleven (11) interconnected repositories Content providers include

Institutional repositories (e.g. university repositories)

Schools (e.g. Rural Wings) Associations (e.g. Ecologica) User communities (AGROASIS) Archives

Almost 10,000 metadata records provided

Page 12: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

PHASE 2 – PROJECTS RELATED TO ORGANIC.EDUNET

Four new interconnected repositories Organic.Balkanet training curriculum (about 100

records) CerOrganic training curriculum (about 300 records) ProdINRA (about 2,000 records) TrAgLOR (Turkish Agricultural Learning Objects

Repository) (about 300 records)

Material related to vocational training and higher education

Multilingual metadata Two existing repositories will be enhanced

The Miksike collection on organic agriculture The Spanish repository on organic agriculture

Org

an

ic.L

ing

ua c

on

ten

t

Page 13: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

PHASE 3 – NEW COLLECTIONS & AFFILIATED CONTENT PROVIDERS

6 new collections: Digital Green OER Africa Green OER YouTube videos on organic Agriculture Slideshare presentations on organic agriculture Flickr photos on organic agriculture

Small collections, based on quality over quantity Manual annotation of a small number of records

Page 14: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE NETWORK OF COLLECTIONS

Page 15: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

CONNECTING TO ORGANIC.EDUNET

Page 16: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

CONNECTING TO THE ORGANIC.EDUNET NETWORK GUIDES

Information on “How to connect” is available through a Wiki page:

http://wiki.agroknow.gr/organic_edunet/index.php/Main_Page

Page 17: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

CONNECTING TO THE ORGANIC.EDUNET NETWORK WORKFLOW

Page 18: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

3 WAYS TO CONNECT TO ORGANIC.EDUNET1. Harvesting of metadata

example: existing and new collections in Confolio harvested through an OAI-PMH target existence of various sets, that may be harvested

individually Metadata records are validated and harvested

2. Ingestion of metadata example: content from social sources XML files retrieved indirectly from

YouTube/Flickr/Slideshare etc. & ingested in compliant tools (Confolio, AgLR)

Metadata records are validated and harvested

3. Creation of metadata Example: not organized collections / individuals Use of AgLR/Confolio for the creation of metadata

records Metadata records are validated and harvested

Page 19: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

1. HARVESTING OF METADATA

Usually the easiest way of content integration

Exposure of metadata through an OAI-PMH target Validation of OAI-PMH target -> Validation

service Metadata validation -> Metadata validation

service

Metadata mapping might be required Currently manual mapping Use of (Ag)Mint is planned

Page 20: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

1. HARVESTING OF METADATA:

WORKFLOW

1. A content provider contacts Organic.Edunet2. The appropriateness of the repository content

is checked against the Organic.Edunet Quality Criteria

3. Basic information is requested from the content provider in a registration form

4. The target is checked using the Organic.Edunet validation service

5. The metadata structure is checked against the Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM AP using the Organic.Edunet metadata validation service

6. Metadata are harvested automatically7. If mapping is needed, then the metadata

elements are manually mapped.

Page 21: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

2. INGESTION OF METADATA

In cases where harvesting is not an option e.g. not supported by the tool, no tool available

Metadata need to be compatible with Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM AP Mapping may be required in some cases

Metadata need to be ingested in a compatible tool and probably enriched Example: The case of YouTube XML files

Content needs to meet the Organic.Edunet Quality Criteria

Page 22: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

2. INGESTION OF METADATA: WORKFLOW

1. A content provider contacts Organic.Edunet2. The appropriateness of the repository content is

checked against the Organic.Edunet Quality Criteria

3. Basic information is requested from the content provider in a registration form

4. A sample number of metadata records (e.g. in xml format) is checked using the Organic.Edunet metadata validation service

5. Metadata are manually ingested6. If mapping is needed, then the metadata

elements are manually mapped before ingestion.

7. In case of additional content, new manual ingestion needs to take place

Page 23: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

INGESTION VS HARVESTING

Trying to encourage content providers to enable/support harvesting of their metadata records.

Page 24: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

3. CREATION OF METADATA

In cases where harvesting/ingestion is not an option e.g. offline collections, not digitized material etc.

Metadata records created from scratch Fully compatible with Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM

AP if a compatible tool is used (AgLR / Confolio) Mapping is needed in case of APs other than

Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM.

Page 25: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

3. CREATION OF METADATA: WORKFLOW

Non-digitized content

New contentContent locally

stored (e.g. hard disk)

Metadata Annotation Tool

1. Types of Content

2. Creation of metadata

3. Validation of metadata

4. Publication through

Organic.Edunet Web portal

Page 26: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET IEEE LOM AP & ONTOLOGY

Page 27: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE ORGANIC.EDUNET AP (1/2)

Based on the IEEE LOM AP, standard for describing educational resources

Slightly modified in order to match better the annotation of agricultural educational resources Selection of metadata elements Changes in the status of elements (e.g. mandatory) Introduction of required extensions

Multilingual AP: Currently available in 16 languages, including Arabic, Chinese & Hindi

Recently updated to a new version, reflecting the requirements of the Organic.Lingua EU project

Page 28: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE ORGANIC.EDUNET AP (2/2)

The new Organic.Edunet AP is available at:http://wiki.agroknow.gr/organic_lingua/Organic.Edunet_Metadata_Application_Profile

Page 29: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE ORGANIC.EDUNET ONTOLOGY

A conceptual model useful for classifying learning materials on the Organic Agriculture (OA) and Agroecology (AE) domain

Used in the Organic.Edunet web portal for the semantic search

Recently revised in the context of the Organic.Lingua project

Page 30: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET-COMPLIANT TOOLS

Page 31: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

1. Confolio Repository Tool Used by the Organic.Edunet consortium content providers as well

as by some of the new ones Folder-based organization of records Integrates the previous Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM AP (v2.0) Multilingual user interface – currently available in 17 languages

2. Agricultural Learning Repository (AgLR) Tool A tool developed by Agro-Know to support new content providers Integrates the latest Organic.Edunet IEEE LOM AP (v3.0) Will integrate the latest Organic.Edunet ontology Supports automatic translation of metadata records (Title,

Description & Keywords) Collection-based organization of records Multilingual user interface – currently available in 10 languages

ORGANIC.EDUNET – THE TOOLS

Page 32: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE ORGANIC.EDUNET CONFOLIO TOOL

Page 33: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

THE AGLR TOOL

Page 34: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ABOUT THE TOOLS

All repository tools that can expose metadata through an OAI-PMH target can be used Metadata will be automatically harvested, after

they are mapped to the Organic.Edunet metadata AP

Repository tools that cannot expose metadata through an OAI-PMH target can also be used Metadata will have to be exported and then

ingested to a repository tool capable of exposing metadata through OAI-PMH

Page 35: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

ORGANIC.EDUNET IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON…

Page 36: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

1. MULTILINGUALITY

Automatic translation tools to be integrated in both AgLR and Web portal

Work by XEROX (SMT) and CELI (CLIR), adapted in the agricultural sector

Automatic translation of Title, Description & Keywords

Additional services will be used in case of languages not supported by the aforementioned tools

Page 37: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

2. USER ENGAGEMENT

User Generated Content widget developed by K-C

Users allowed to contribute their own content (metadata) using an easy-to-use form

This content includes suggestions for new resources and revisions/translations of existing ones

Page 38: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

3. EXTENDING THE NETWORK

Discussions with new content providers From EU, India and Africa

Revisions in the content integration workflow Revision of the quality criteria Definition of the scope of the network

Page 39: Developing a network of content providers:  The case of  Organic.Edunet

Thank you for your

attentio

n!