22
Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results Robert J. Vanderbei 2007 May 26 NJAA Voorhees State Park, High Bridge NJ http://www.princeton.edu/rvdb

Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Detecting ExtraSolar Planets:

A Survey of Methods and Results

Robert J. Vanderbei

2007 May 26

NJAAVoorhees State Park, High Bridge NJ

http://www.princeton.edu/∼rvdb

Page 2: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results
Page 3: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Are We Alone?

Page 4: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Indirect Detection Methods

209 planets found so far

Page 5: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Wobble Methods

Radial Velocity.For edge-on systems.Measure periodic doppler shift.

Astrometry.Best for face-on systems.Measure circular wobble against back-ground stars.

Page 6: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

First Discovery: 51 Pegasi b

• Mayor and Queloz (1995)

• Mag. 5.5 main sequence star

• Detected by radial velocity method

• Velocity difference: 70 m/s = 160 mph

• Period: 4.2 days

• Separation: 0.05 AU

• Angular separation: 0.0035 arcseconds

• Mass: > 0.47MJ

• Hot Jupiter

Page 7: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Notable Recent Discovery: Gliese 581c

Possibly Terrestrial

• Mag. 10.5 red dwarf

• Detected by radial velocity method

• Period: 13 days

• Separation: 0.07 AU

• Angular Separation: 0.012 arcseconds

• Mass: > 5ME

Page 8: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Transit Method

• HD209458b confirmed both via RV andtransit.

• Period: 3.5 days

• Separation: 0.045 AU (0.001 arcsecs)

• Radius: 1.3RJ

• Intensity Dip: ∼ 1.7%

• Venus Dip = 0.01%, Jupiter Dip: 1%

• Kepler and Corot Venus Transit (R.J. Vanderbei)

Page 9: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Gravitational Lensing (OGLE)

8 discoveries.

Page 10: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Astrometry

• Space Interferometry Mission (SIM)

• Wobbles as small as 0.000001 arcsecs (thethickness of a nickel viewed from the dis-tance of the moon).

• Mission Cancelled

Page 11: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Direct Detection

Page 12: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Why It’s Hard

• Bright Star/Faint Planet: In visible light,our Sun is 1010 times brighter than Earth.That’s 25 mags.

• Close to Each Other: A planet at 1 AU froma star at 10 parsecs can appear at most 0.1arcseconds in separation.

• Far from Us: There are less than 100 Sun-like stars within 10 parsecs.

Page 13: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Space-Based IR Interferometer (TPF-I)

Page 14: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Telescope w/ Unobstructed Aperture

Doesn’t Work! Requires an aperture measured in kilometers to mitigate diffraction effects.

Pupil Mask

-0.5 0 0.5

-0.5

0

0.5

Image (PSF) linear

-20 -10 0 10 20

-20

-10

0

10

20

Image (PSF) log

-20 -10 0 10 20

-20

-10

0

10

20-20 -10 0 10 20

10-8

10-6

10-4

10-2

100Image (PSF) Cross Section

Page 15: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Lyot Coronagraph (TPF-C)

Page 16: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Apodized Pupil Coronagraph (Unmanufacturable)

Apodized pupil

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Image plane

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60-180

-160

-140

-120

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

Page 17: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Shaped Pupil Coronagraph (TPF-C)

20 petals 150 petals

Page 18: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Pupil Mapping (TPF-C)

All above methods require optics of extraordinary quality: 1/10, 000 wave precision.

Page 19: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Space-based Occulter (TPF-O)

Telescope Aperture: 4m, Occulter Diameter: 50m, Occulter Distance: 72, 000km

Page 20: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Plain External Occulter (Doesn’t Work!)

x in meters

y in

met

ers

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

x in meters

y in

met

ers

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Page 21: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Shaped Occulter

x in meters

y in

met

ers

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

x in meters

y in

met

ers

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Page 22: Detecting ExtraSolar Planets: A Survey of Methods and Results

Ground-Based Possibilities

• Atmospheric seeing limits resolution to about 1 arcsec.

• Large aperture with adaptive optics.

• Interferometry.