Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jodhpur XVII
DETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORTDETAILED PROJECT REPORT NAME OF WATERSHED : CHANDRAKH (JODHPUR XVII) MACRO/MICRO WATERSHED No. : CLUSTER GRAM PANCHAYAT : CHANDRAKH PROJECT AREA : 3000 Ha. PROJECT COST : 450 Lakh
-: SUBMITTED BY :-
ASSISTANT ENGINEER PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
PANCHAYAT SAMITI - BAORI (JODHPUR)
PAGE No.
CHAPTER - 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Philosophy of Integrated watershed management Pragramme
1.3 Objectives of IWMP
1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme
1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed
Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the watershed
1.6 Project Background
Table No. 2 Basic Project Information
Table No. 3 Watershed information
CHAPTER - 2 Project Implementing Agency
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
Table No. 4 Detail of PIA
Table No. 5 Staff at PIA level
2.1.1 Role and responsibility of WDT
2.1.2 SWOT analysis of PIA
CHAPTER - 3 Basic Information of Watershed
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern
Table No. 6 Land use pattern
3.1.2 Soil and topography
Table No. 7 Soil type and topography
Table No. 8 Flood and drought condition
Table No. 9 Climatic conditions
Table No. 10 Physiography and relief
Table No. 11 Slope detail of watershed
INDEX
PARTICULARS
Table No. 12 Erosion status in project area
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture
Table No. 13 Land ownership details
Table No. 14 Land use & land classification
Table No. 15 Agriculture
Table No. 16 Crop details
Table No. 17 Crop production
3.1.4 Livestock
Table No. 18 Livestock
Table No. 19 Milk Production
Table No. 20 Drinking water
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status
Table No. 21 Demographic information
Table No. 22 Literacy rate
Table No. 23 Poverty
3.2.2 Migration Pattern
Table No. 24 Migration details
Table No. 25 Village infrastructure
Table No. 26 Facilities / HH assets
CHAPTER - 4 Watershed Activities
4.1 Scientific Planning
Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project
4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy
4.2.1 Social Strategy
4.2.2 Technical Strategy
4.2.3 Water Budgeting
Table No. 28 Strange's Table
Table No. 29 Total Available Runoff
Table No. 30 Runoff Tapped in Existing Structures
Table No. 31 Balance Available Runoff
4.3 Institution building
4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
Table No. 32 Watershed Committee Chandrakh
4.3.2 Self Help Group
4.3.3 User Group
Table No. 33 Status of SHG
4.4 Physical activities to be undertake
4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
Table No. 34 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES
4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY
4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE
4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION
4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS
4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS
4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT
4.4.2.7 FENCING
4.4.2.8 DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)
4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES
4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION
4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE
4.4.3.3 V DITCH
4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES
4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)
4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM
4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM
4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)
4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM
CHAPTER - 5 Activity wise Abstract of Cost
CHAPTER - 6 Annual Action Plan
CHAPTER - 7 Project Outcomes
CHAPTER - 8 Technical Design & Estimates
CHAPTER - 9 Annexure
Jodhpur XVII
CHAPTER - 1
IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRROOOOOOOODDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
Jodhpur XVII
1.1 Introduction
In India, where a lot of water goes waste, it is important to apply the technology of Watershed
management to solve its annual problems of droughts and floods. The demand for water exceeds its supply.
Conflicts sharing water resources are on the rise. Planning and development of Watersheds calls for a rigorous
understanding of the occurrence and movement of water in the surface and sub-surface systems along with soil
and nutrient losses in a Watershed as the need arises for a proper Watershed management of that area. In a
country like India, where a lot of running water goes waste, it becomes very important to apply the technology of
Watershed management to solve its annual problems of droughts and floods.
Watershed management basically involves harmonizing the use of soil and water resources between
upstream and downstream areas within a Watershed toward the objectives of natural resource conservation,
increased agricultural productivity and a better standard of living for its inhabitants. Identifying and addressing
the significant externalities associated with Watershed is critical for these objectives to be achieved in a
sustainable manner.
In the 1980s and 1990s, agricultural scientists and planners aimed to promote rain-fed agriculture through
Watershed development. A Watershed is an area from which all water drains to a common point, making it an
interesting unit for managing water and soil resources to enhance agricultural production through water
conservation
1.2 Philosophy of Integrated Watershed management Programme
Jodhpur XVII
IWM planning is a comprehensive multi-resource management planning process, involving all stakeholders
within the Watershed, who together as a group, cooperatively work towards identifying the resource issues and
concerns of the Watershed, as well as develop and implement a Watershed plan with solutions that are
environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.
In India, the IWM efforts go back to 1970. There have been many changes in the implementation strategies
during the following years. Until 1995, Watershed development projects were officially coordinated by multi-
sectoral programmes (with differing objectives) launched by the Government of India. After review in 1999 by
the Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Agriculture, a common set of operational guidelines,
objectives, strategies and expenditure norms were established for Watershed development programmes in 2001.
These are implemented through programmes such as DPAP (Drought-Prone Area Programme), DDP (Desert
Development Programme) and IWDP (Integrated Watershed Development Programme).
The guidelines encourage the active involvement of non-governmental organizations, semi-governmental
institutions and private enterprises, universities and training institutions. However, concerns are being raised that
emphasis in Watershed development programmes is still firmly based on the belief that water is an infinite
resource, through development of groundwater abstraction and water harvesting techniques. IWM does not
merely imply the amalgamation of different activities to be undertaken within a hydrological unit. It also requires
the collation of relevant information so as to evaluate the cause and effect of all the proposed actions. The
Watershed is the smallest unit where the evaluation of human-induced impacts upon natural resources becomes
possible. Therefore, although the ‘Panchayat’ remains the preferred implementation unit, the Watershed should
be the evaluation unit used in assessing impacts
Jodhpur XVII
1.3 Objectives of the IWMP
The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and
developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are prevention of
soil run-off, regeneration of natural vegetation, rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water table.
This enables multi-cropping and the introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide
sustainable livelihoods to the people residing in the Watershed area.
1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme
Watershed Development Programme is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty
Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status,
Moisture Index, Area under rain-fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded
land, Productivity potential of the land, Contiguity of another Watershed that has already developed/treated,
Watershed approach for plain or for hilly terrain
1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed
State Remote Sensing Application Center, Jodhpur (SRSAC) has prepared "Watershed Atlas of Rajasthan ".
Watersheds have been delineated into macro / micro in each block. These have been prioritized on the basis of
two important parameters i) extent of availability of cultivable arable lands and ii) Drainage Density. Besides this
priority Watershed with preponderance of resource poor, SC/ST population is given importance. Willingness of
community to participate, contribute in the programme and to take up responsibility of post project maintenance
of the created assets. Weightage given to these criteria for selection is as follows:
Jodhpur XVII
Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed
S. No
.
Criteria Maximum
score Ranges & scores
i Poverty index (% of
poor to population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %
(2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10)
20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower
than minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or
higher than minimum wages
(0)
iv % of small and marginal farmers
10 More than 80 % (10)
50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block
15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed
agriculture
15 More than 90 %
(15)
80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)
Partially covered (5)
Fully covered (0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15)
Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)
Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)
x Productivity potential
of the land
15 Lands with low
production & where productivity
can be
Lands with
moderate production &
where
Lands with high
production & where
productivity can
Jodhpur XVII
significantly
enhanced with reasonable efforts
(15)
productivity can
be enhanced with reasonable
efforts (10)
be marginally
enhanced with reasonable efforts
(5)
xi Contiguity to another
Watershed that has
already been developed/ treated
10 Contiguous to
previously treated
Watershed & contiguity within the micro-Watersheds in the
project (10)
Contiguity within
the micro-
Watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously
treated Watershed (5)
Neither
contiguous to
previously treated Watershed nor contiguity within the micro-
Watersheds in the project (0)
xii Watershed approach in the plains (more than
one contiguous micro-Watersheds in the
project)
15 Above 6 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (15)
4 to 6 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (10)
2 to 4 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (5)
xiii Watershed approach in the hills (more than
one contiguous micro-Watersheds in the
project)
15 Above 5 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (15)
3 to 5 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (10)
2 to 3 micro-Watersheds in
Watershed (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Jodhpur XVII Watershed project as
given in table No. 1.1
Total number of families under BPL is 182 which are less than 50 per cent of the total households. The
percentage of SC/ST is about 20 per cent to the total population. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary
Jodhpur XVII
occupation of the Watershed due to the fact that ground water is very deep and there is no source of irrigation.
More than 50 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the
labour is more than the minimum wages.
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under
DDP block. The Jodhpur XVII Watershed falls in the continuity with other Watershed namely Chandrakh
(HARIYALI-IV). Watershed approach was followed taking into consideration five Watersheds covering a total area
of 3000 ha.
Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the Watershed
S.
No.
Distt Block Project
Name
No. of micro
W/s covered
Proposed
project
area
Type of
project
(Hilly /
Desert /
others)
Propo
sed
cost
Weightage under the criteria
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Total
1 Jodhpur Baori Jodhpur
XVII
Cluster 3000 Desert 450 7.5 5 0 5 5 10 15 7.5 10 10 10 10 95
1.6 Project Background
Jodhpur XVII
Jodhpur XVII project is located in Baori Panchayat Samiti, Jodhpur District of Rajasthan State. The project
is a Cluster of three villages namely Chandrakh, Raikoria and Nahri Nadi.
The total project area of the Watershed is about 3600 ha of which 3000 ha. has been undertaken to be
treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.
The nearest town is Baori which is about 16 Km from Jodhpur XVII and is well connected by pucca road.
The Watershed includes area of three villages namely Chandrakh, Raikoria and Nahri Nadi. Jat, Rajput, Bishnoi,
and SC communities are the primary inhabitants of the Watershed. The livelihood of these people is primarily
based on rain-fed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, cow, goat and sheep rearing. The project area falls
under the Desert Prone area according to DoLR Classification and situated at 28o N Latitude & 71o E Longitude.
Table no. 2: Basic Project Information
S.
No.
Name of
Project
Villages Area
(ha.)
Gram
Panchayats
District PIA Area
falling in
Project
(ha.)
Project
Cost Name Census
Code
1 Jodhpur
XVII
Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
01938600 4097 Chandrakh Jodhpur A. En.
3000
450
lakh
2 Raikoria 01942300 997 Chandrakh Jodhpur A. En.
Jodhpur XVII
Table no. 3: Watershed information
Name of the
project
Watershed to be
treated
Watershed type
Jodhpur XVII 3000 ha Cluster
Jodhpur XVII
CHAPTER – 2
PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT
IIIIIIIIMMMMMMMMPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG
AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNCCCCCCCCYYYYYYYY
Jodhpur XVII
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is selected by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated
Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Rajasthan. The PIA for Jodhpur XVII Watershed is Assistant
Engineer Panchayat Samiti Baori. The PIA is a block level nodal agency responsible for smooth implementation of
Watershed project. The objectives of PIA are supervising, planning, implementing and promoting Watershed
development project and related development activities as per guide lines. The PIA has dedicated and experienced
staff:
Table no. 4 : Detail of PIA
Sr.
No. Names of project Details of PIA
1 IWMP Jodhpur XVII
Designation
& Address
AEn Watershed development & soil conservation
Baori (Jodhpur)
Telephone 02921277024
Fax
E-mail [email protected]
Jodhpur XVII
Table no. : 5 Staff at PIA level
S.
No.
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification
1 Suresh Kumar Duggal 52 M Assistant Engineer B.E. (Ag)
2 Giriraj Kishor Nagla 40 M Junior Engineer B.E. (Ag) M.E. (SWC)
3 Jitendra Mathur 38 M WDT (Technical) Diploma in Civil Engg.
4 Shivdan Singh Rathore 40 M WDT (Agriculture) B.Sc. (Ag)
5 Nathuram Punia 30 M WDT (Veterinary) Diploma in Vet. Astt.
2.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities of WDT
1 Assist Gram Panchayat / Gram Sabha in constitution of the Watershed Committee and their
functioning.
2 Organizing and nurturing User Groups and Self - Help Group.
3 Mobilizing women to ensure that the perspectives and interests of women are adequately reflected in
the Watershed action plan.
4 Conducting the participatory base - line surveys, training and capacity building.
Jodhpur XVII
5 Preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation or reclamation
etc. to promote sustainable livelihoods at household level.
6 Common property resource management and equitable sharing.
7 Preparing detailed Project Report (DPR) for the consideration of Gram sabha.
8 Undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawings and cost estimates for any structures
to be built
9 Monitoring, checking, assessing, and undertaking physical verification and measurements of the work
done.
10 Facilitating the development of livelihood opportunities for the landless.
11 Maintaining project accounts.
12 Arranging physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken.
13 Setting up suitable arrangement for post-project operation, maintenance and future development of
the assets created during the project period
2.1.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA
Strength:
1 Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team
2 Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, for
capacity building and technical guidance.
3 Scientific planning in Watershed project with the help of SRSAC, Jodhpur
Jodhpur XVII
4 District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.
5 Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.
6 Watershed Dept. have long experience in Watershed works and has won five national
productivity awards
Weakness:
1 Lack of proper supporting staff.
2 No permanent staff
3 No permanent office building.
4 Unwanted political interference.
Opportunities:
1 Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less.
2 Improvement of socio-economic status of poor’s.
3 Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT
activities.
4 Reduction of migration rate.
5 Usage of new technologies of Watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the Watershed
activities.
6 Over all integrated development of rural peoples
7 Independent DWDU, PIA & Watershed committee to over all monitoring and execution of
Jodhpur XVII
activities.
Threats:
(1)Lack of sustainable agriculture development.
(2)Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.
(3)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.
(4)Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.
(5)Low literacy rate in the project area.
Jodhpur XVII
CHAPTER - 3
BBBBBBBBAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSIIIIIIIICCCCCCCC IIIIIIIINNNNNNNNFFFFFFFFOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD
Jodhpur XVII
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern
The net geographical area of Watershed is about 3000 ha out of which 0.0 % is forest area.
About 39 % of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 7 % is cultivable and rest is
uncultivable. About 59.7 % of land is under agriculture from which 72.77 % is under rain-fed and a
kharif crop is taken, 27 % of land is irrigated by tube wells.
Table no. : 6 Land use pattern
S.
No.
Name of
Village
Geographical
area
Forest
area
(ha
)
Land under
agri. Use
(ha)
Rain-fed
area
(ha)
Permanent
pasture
Wasteland
Cultivable
(ha)
Non
cultivable
(ha)
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
4097 0.00 3660 2500 34 1091 1249
2 Raikoria 997 0.00 990 975 18 0 26
3.1.2 Soil and topography
Jodhpur XVII Watershed project falls under North West Rajasthan Agro Climatic Zone. The
soil is mainly sandy loam and. The soil is brown to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The
depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand
Jodhpur XVII
and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil
falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10%
slope
Table no. : 7 Soil type and topography
S.
No.
Name of Agro-
climatic zone
covers w/s area
Area in
ha
Name of villages Major soil types Topography
Type Area
1 I A 4097 Chandrakh,
Nahri Nadi
Sandy to
Loamy sand
4097 Moderate
slope
2 I A 997 Raikoria Sandy to
Loamy sand
997 Moderate
slope
Table no. : 8 Flood and drought condition
S. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Chandrakh Nahri Nadi Nil Once in three year
2 Raikoria Nil Once in three year
Jodhpur XVII
Jodhpur XVII
Table no. : 9 Climatic conditions
S.
No.
Year Rainfall (mm) Temperature (degree centigrade) Highest intensity of
rainfall (mm in a
day)
Annual
Rainy days
Maximum Minimum
1 2010 420 48.5 6.3 121 33
2 2009 145 48.0 7.4 45 10
3 2008 270.2 47.5 6.1 44 16
4 2007 201 46.0 6.2 43 17
5 2006 205.5 46.5 5.8 33 18
The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three
years. The average rainfall of this area is about 250 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity
of 121 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the
streams resulting in silting of the village tank.
Table no. : 10 Physiography and relief
Jodhpur XVII
S. No. Village Area Highest
contour level
Lowest
contour level
Level
difference
Length of
travel
% slope
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
4097 370 360 5 4002 0.1
2 Raikoria 997 354 342 6 2940 0.2
Table no. : 11 Slope Detail of Watershed
S. No. Slope % Area
1 0-1 % 1790
2 1-3 % 730
3 3-5 % 480
Total 3000
Table no.: 12 Erosion status in project Area
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run
off(mm/
year)
Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/
year)
Water erosion
a Sheet 1114 300 4112
Jodhpur XVII
b Rill 32 300 230
c Gully 17 300 860
Sub-Total 5202
Wind erosion 1780 NA 2240
Total for project 2943 7442
Project Area is affected by water erosion & wind erosion both, such that loss of soil fertility takes
place every year. Production depleting year by year. It is major problem of Watershed
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture
Lack of surface water source and very deep ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation
as well as drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 6.75 ha ranging from 1 to 20 ha. Lack of
irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects
directly the demographic profile of the Watershed. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Bajra
(Pearl millet). Some of the farmers have Tube well as source of irrigation and take up Rabi crop also. The
soil and moisture conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them
to take up rabi crop of Arandi and cumin in the residual moisture.
Table no. : 13 Land ownership details
Jodhpur XVII
S. No. Village Total owned land (ha)
Gen OBC SC ST
No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
178 697.6 245 640.16 60 247 12 124
2 Raikoria 42 382.56 56 516.73 1 8 0 0
S. No. Village Total owned land (ha)
Type of farmer
Large Small Marginal BPL
No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
172 1087.2 130 304 31 17.28 146 20
2 Raikoria 72 825.77 22 69.53 5 2.94 36 12
Table No: 14 Land use & land classification
Jodhpur XVII
S.N.
Name of village Micro
no
Arable Land
Non arable land
(community Land)
Road/
Other
total
land
Irrigate
d
Un
Irrigated
fellow
Govt. Panchayat land
Ha. Ha.
DLT & magra
Pasture
Nadi Aagor
Habitation
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi Cluster 0 3000 541 12 34 6 2 2 3597
2 Raikoria Cluster 0 920 35 2 37 2 1 2.5 997
Table No: 15 Agriculture
S. No. Village Net sown area (ha)
One time Two times Three times
1 Chandrakh Nahri Nadi 500 200 50
2 Raikoria 350 100 40
Table No: 16 Crop details
S.
No.
Village Net sown area (ha.) in Kharif
Bajra Gowar Moong Moth Til
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
501 50 100 250 158
2 Raikoria 450 40 50 150 80
Jodhpur XVII
S. No. Village Net sown area (ha.) in Rabi
Wheat Arandi Sarson Onion Garlic
1 Chandrakh Nahri
Nadi
190 180 69 22 2
2 Raikoria 105 110 85 10 2
Table No: 17 Crop production
S. No. Crop production Kg per ha.
Wheat Bajra Moong Moth Onion Arandi
1 2500 1700 385 380 21000 210
3.1.4 Livestock
Majority of community in the Watershed depends on cows and buffaloes for milk. Lack of rain
reduced the fodder availability for animals in Watershed area. This leads to migration to other parts of the
country with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is very low and there is no dairy co operative
in the Watershed.
Jodhpur XVII
Table No : 18 Livestock
S.
No.
Village Cow (No.) Buffalo
(No.)
Goat (No.) Sheep
(No.)
Camel
(No.)
Other
(No.)
1 Chandrakh Nahri Nadi 150 14 1350 1330 55 40
2 Raikoria 110 2 200 300 12 10
Table No: 19 Milk Production
S. No. Village Cow (ltr/annum) Buffalo (ltr/annum) Goat (ltr/annum) Total (ltr/annum)
No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
100 2010 4 160 1200 2010 1304 4108
2 Raikoria 70 1400 2 80 150 755 222 2235
Table No: 20 Drinking water
Jodhpur XVII
S. No. Village Ground water
table (Ft.)
Source of
drinking water
Availability in
months
Quality
1 Chandrakh Nahri Nadi 445 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline
2 Raikoria 442 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline
3.2 Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status
Jodhpur XVII Watershed project has a total of 610 households with a population of 4435 (as per
base-line survey) out of which 2328 are male and 2107 female .The sex ratio is 905 female to 1000 male.
There are 182 BPL families. The average family size is 6. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 32.7 per cent;
male literacy rate is 48.7 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 13.75 per
cent (of total female population). It is noticeable that only five persons have reached up to Secondary
standard. The major castes in the Watershed are Jat, Rajput, Bishnoi, and SC communities. Majority of
population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.
Table No: 21 Demographic information
Jodhpur XVII
S. No. Village Population SC / ST population
Male Female Total Male Female Total
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
1853 1657 3510 403 344 747
2 Raikoria 475 450 925 67 58 125
Table No: 22 Literacy rate
S. No. Village Literacy
Total % Male % Female %
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
1157 32.96 915 49.38 242 14.6
2 Raikoria 275 29.73 224 47.16 51 11.33
Table No: 23 Poverty
S.
No.
Village Total
household
Total BPL
HH
% of BPL
HH
Landless HH % of Land
less HH
1 Chandrakh, Nahri
Nadi
495 146 29.5 6 0.04
Jodhpur XVII
2 Raikoria 115 36 31.3 5 0.04
3.2.2 Migration Pattern
People migrate during summer season to different parts of state and country like Jodhpur,
Bangalore, Mumbai and Pune as daily wagers and construction workers. Lack of irrigation facility,
employment and fodder availability force these people to migrate to other places.
Table No: 24 Migration details
S.
No.
Village Total
Population
Migration Migration by months Income
during
migration
Total Male Female Up to 3
months
3-6
months
>6
months
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
3510 27 15 12 5 12 10 40000
2 Raikoria 925 16 10 6 12 2 2 34000
Table No: 25 Village infrastructures
Jodhpur XVII
S.
No.
Village Pucca
road to
village
Schools Aangan
wadi
Post office Milk
collection
centre
PHED
tube well
PHC
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
Yes 4 3 0 0 4 1
2 Raikoria No 3 2 0 0 2 0
Table No: 26 Facilities / HH assets
S.
No.
Village HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with
phones
HHs with
vehicle
HHs
with
TV set
HHs
with
LPG
gas
HHs
with
fridge
HHs
with
Tube
Well
1 Chandrakh
Nahri Nadi
285 23 180 175 33 20 0 10
2 Raikoria 72 16 33 50 9 10 0 5
The Jodhpur XVII Watershed comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If
they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like mustard, cumin, Cotton, Moong etc. In case
of low rainfall they go for Bajra. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Jodhpur XVII
Jodhpur XVII
Watershed.
The Jodhpur XVII Watershed area has low productivity because of the following
reasons:-
i) Full dependence on monsoon
Jodhpur XVII Watershed is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the
absence of proper irrigation facility, most of the cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon.
Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture
production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate
ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area
Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and
insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.
iii) Traditional farming methods
This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming
methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper
way that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.
iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery
Even today a large number of farmers in Jodhpur XVII Watershed use traditional methods of
ploughing and irrigation. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill, Combine harvester etc. So, old
machineries take more time in tillage practices
Jodhpur XVII
iv) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The
use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In Lavera Kalan, however, there are two
limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in Jodhpur
XVII most of the land depends on rainfall, mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea.
This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land
v) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper
market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of
transportation and roads. and second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.
CHAPTER - 4
WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD
AAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed
regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor
infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there
is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with Watershed development. The common
guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation Watershed development.
4.1 Scientific Planning
(i) Watershed Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a Watershed of micro-
Watershed. The Jodhpur XVII Watershed project consists of five village. Further Jodhpur XVII Watershed project is
in continuation with other Watershed namely Chandrakh (Hariyali IV), this gives an element of continuation of the
programme.
(ii) Base line survey
To access the impact of any Watershed development programme a detailed base line survey has to be
conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development
programme. A detailed base line survey was undertaken by WDT which involved household census survey, Bio-
physical survey and village level data collection. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which
was filled by visiting each and every household in the villages. This gave in the details of the demographic profile
of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net
consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their
benefits.
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the villages. It included
the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of
irrigation in the field.
(iii) Participatory Rural Approach (PRA)
The past experience of Watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the
stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities
and their local indigenous technological knowledge while planning for any activity. Participatory Rural Approach
provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete
accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season
calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and the Watershed
in specific. Various tools like matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, fodder
crops, various institution and their significance in the life of farmers.
(iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of Watershed development.
(A) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various parameters were taken
into account like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL population, Ground water status, Drinking water situation and Slope
percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of
various Watershed area.
(B) Planning
State Remote Sensing Application Centre has provided various maps like slope map, contour map, Land use land
cover map, Satellite image maps were used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in
the project area. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:10000 was used for identifying various
locations for soil and water conservation structures.
(C) Topographical survey of DLT
There is a good drainage line in the Watershed, so for treatment of drainage line a topographical survey was
essential. This help in selection of site for LSCD, Nallah bunding and Masonry check dams.
Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project
S. No. Scientific criteria / inputs used Whether Scientific
criteria used
1 A. Planning
a. Watershed approach Yes
b. Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged?
If yes, mention the name of the institute
c. Baseline survey Yes
d. Hydro-geological survey Yes
e. Contour mapping Yes
f. Participatory Rural Approach (PRA) Yes
g. Remote sensing data Yes
h. Ridge to valley treatment planning Yes
i. Online IT connectivity between -
(1) Project and DRDA cell / ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes
j. Availability of GIS layers -
(1) Cadastral map
(2) Village boundaries Yes
(3) Drainage Yes
(4) Slope map Yes
(5) Land use Yes
(6) Ground water status No
(7) Watershed boundaries Yes
2 Inputs
(1) Bio- pesticides No
(2) Organic manure Yes
(3) Vermi-compost Yes
(4) Bio-fertilizer No
(5) Water saving devices Yes
(6) Mechanized tools / Implements Yes
(7) Bio-fencing Yes
(8) Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No
4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy
The developmental strategy is two pronged- technical and social, both integrated for sustainable development
of natural resources. Social strategy is for creating awareness and capacity building of community for self-
motivation and long term commitment to the project for its sustainability. Technical strategy is for planning
designing & implementation of activities for development of natural resources
4.2.1 Social Strategy
• Participatory Approach for empowerment of Community: People’s participation is the key to sustainable
Watershed development programmes.
• Demand Driven Project Proposals of the community and Flexibility in choice of Technology.
• Equity for Resource Poor and Women: In all Watershed development projects thrust is on improving equity
by addressing needs of all sections of community
• Social Audit
• Linkages of Watershed community with Panchayat Raj Institutions: An important element of long term
sustainability is to forge linkages with permanent institutions in the area. So, linkages are forged between
the Panchayats and the Watershed communities.
4.2.2 Technical Strategy
• Ridge to Valley approach
• In-situ moisture conservation
• Reduce Runoff velocity
• Rain Water harvesting with the approach of ‘Water Budgeting
• Alternate land use i. e. Horticulture, Agro forestry, Pasture development & forestry plantation based on
land capability classification.
• Flexibility in choice of Technology: Taking account of the high degree of heterogeneity in the socio
economic and agro ecological conditions in rain fed areas, a high degree of flexibility is provided in the
choice of appropriate, at the Watershed level
• Low cost, replicable & indigenous technologies
4.2.3 Water Budgeting
Table No. 28 Strange's Table Yield from 1 hectare of Natural (Untreated) catchment
Total Monsoon
rainfall in mm
Good Catchment Average Catchment Bad Catchment
% of utilisable
rain water
Utilisable
rain water
(Cum)
% of
utilisable
rain water
Utilisable
rain water
(Cum)
% of utilisable
rain water
Utilisable
rain water
(Cum)
20 0.08 0.16 0.06 0.12 0.04 0.08
40 0.13 0.52 0.0975 0.39 0.065 0.26
60 0.245 1.47 0.1735 1.041 0.1225 0.735
80 0.41 3.28 0.3075 2.46 0.205 1.64
100 0.7 7 0.525 5.25 0.35 3.5
120 0.9 10.8 0.675 8.1 0.45 5.4
140 1.1225 15.715 0.91875 12.8625 0.6125 8.575
160 1.625 26 1.21875 19.5 0.8125 13
180 2.12 38.16 1.59 28.62 1.06 19.08
200 2.7 54 2.025 40.5 1.35 27
220 3.26 71.72 2.445 53.79 1.63 35.86
240 3.81 91.44 2.8575 68.58 1.905 45.72
260 4.45 115.7 3.3375 86.775 2.225 57.85
280 5.19 145.32 3.3925 94.99 2.595 72.66
300 5.9 177 4.425 132.75 2.95 88.5
320 6.72 215.04 5.04 161.28 3.36 107.52
340 7.75 263.5 5.6775 193.035 3.785 128.69
360 8.55 307.8 6.4125 230.85 4.275 153.9
380 9.45 359.1 7.0876 269.329 4.725 179.55
400 10.25 410 7.6875 307.5 5.125 205
420 11.05 464.1 8.2875 348.075 5.525 232.05
440 12 528 9 396 6 264
460 12.95 595.7 7.7125 354.775 6.475 297.85
480 13.9 667.2 10.425 500.4 6.95 333.6
500 14.7 735 11.025 551.25 7.35 367.5
520 15.5 806 11.625 604.5 7.75 403
540 16.36 883.44 12.2625 662.175 8.175 441.45
560 17.2 963.2 12.9 722.4 8.6 481.6
580 18 1044 13.5 783 9 522
600 19 1140 14.25 855 9.5 570
Good catchment - Hills or plains with little cultivation and moderately absorbant soil
Average catchment - Flat partly cultivated stiff gravely sandy absorbant soil
Bad catchment - Flat and cultivated sandy soil
Table No. 29 Total available runoff
Cluster Area
ha.
Type of
catchment
Utilisable rain water/ ha
(Cu.m.)
Utilisable rain water from w/s
(Cu.m.)
Chandrakh 3000 Average 132.75 398250
Total 398250
Table No. 30 Run off tapped in existing structure
S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (Cu.m.)
i) Major Irrigation
Project 0
ii) Medium Irrigation
Project 0 0
iii) Form Ponds/Tanks 103 112000
iv) Anicuts 1 5600
Total 117600
Balance 280650
Table No. 31 Balance available runoff
Available for Harvesting 75% (Cu.m.) 210487.5
Activity No. Storage capacity per
No. (Cu.m.)
Total water to be harvested
(Cu.m.)
Tanka 188 25 4700
Khadin 4 3350 13400
LSCD 9 200 1800
Bunding 550 300 165000
Dug out pond 10 500 5000
Nalla bund 4 20 80
PD 10 1100 11000
Total 200980
The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area. Loose stone check dam, Masonry check
dam, Contour bunding, Dug out pond, Nallah bunding and water harvesting structure in arable land (Tanka) etc.
activities could be done.
4.3 Institution building
4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
Watershed committee is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the Watershed project with
technical support of WDT. The Gram Sabha of the Gram Panchayat select the chairman of the w/s
committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. In Jodhpur XVII Watershed one w/s
committee was formed namely Chandrakh w/s committee of Chandrakh gram panchayat.
Table No. 32 W/s Committee Chandrakh
S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational
Qualification
1 Omaram / Hukmaram Jat President M OBC Literate
2 Rajesh / Kaluram Godara Secretary M OBC Secondry
3 Pannalal / Nawlaram Member M OBC Illiterate
4 Ms. Mani devi / Moolaram Godara Member F OBC Literate
5 Ms. Mohni Devi / Pannaram
Meghwal
Member F SC Illiterate
6 Ms. PaduKanwar / Budhhsingh
Rajput
Member F Gen Literate
7 Sumer singh / Jor singh Member M Gen Illiterate
8 Bhanwar singh / Achal singh Member M Gen Illiterate
9 Ms. Devi / Pannaram Member F OBC Illiterate
10 Swaroop ram / Rana ram Bhil Member M ST Literate
11 Ms. Amri devi / Hariram Harijan Member F SC Literate
12 Sawai singh / Member M Gen Illiterate
13 Salam singh / Jugat singh Member M Gen Illiterate
14 Bhomaram / Kisturam Meghwal Member M SC Illiterate
15 Pusaram / Bhura ram Jat Member M OBC Illiterate
Details of Bank Account :
For each water shed committee, the separate saving bank account has been opened with the name of
Sarpanch, Secretary WC and WDT member (Junior Engineer). One separate Watershed Development Fund (WDF)
account will be opened for each committee. In the WDF Account no transaction will be done only the contribution
received from beneficiaries will be deposited. The details of bank account are :
Table No. 33
S.No.
Watershed
Committee
Account No. Bank Name
Saving A/C No. WDF A/C No.
1. Chandrakh 05380110030622 05380110030639 UCO Bank Baori
S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha
approved EPA
1. Chandrakh
4.3.2 Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and
thrift activities. Self Help Group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood, generally Self
Help Groups include landless and poor men and women.
Before formation of the SHGs during PRA activities focused group discussion (FGDs) were held with the
women, which came up with the following observations
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
Status of new SHG is shown in table no.33
4.3.3 User Group
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on
a long term basis. The User Group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and
manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership
with community spirit.
4.4 Physical activities to be undertaken
4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under Watershed project to build a rapport with the village community at
the beginning of the project, generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local
community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted with Watershed development committee
regarding the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 18.648 Lakh was allotted for
EPA activity, which was 4% of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they
felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken
which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an
instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table No. 34 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
S.
No.
Name of WC Amount
earmarked for
EPA
Entry Point Activity planned Estimated Cost
(Lakh)
1 Chandrakh 18.00 Installation of Solar light 4
Rain water harvesting structure
(Tanka), GLR, Pipe Line
12
Repairing of Rain water harvesting
structure (Tanka)
2
4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES
4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY
Suitable forestry plants like Khejri, Ardoo, Desi Babool, Neem, Kumtha etc. are planted on the field
boundaries to meet the fuel & fodder requirements of the farmer.
4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE
Suitable horticulture plants like Mango, Lemon, Guava, Ber, Pomegranate, Anwala etc. are grown with
the crops, to improve the income & nutrition level of the cultivators. A water harvesting structure (Tanka)
is constructed to fulfill the water requirement of horticulture plants
4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION
To show the quantitative and qualitative difference between traditional and improved practices/ inputs and
in order to motivate the farmers to adopt improved agricultural practices/ inputs recommended by the
Research Institutions/ Department of Agriculture, demonstrations are conducted in a small area of 0.5 ha.
4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS
Organic manure is decomposed agricultural waste and cow dung, which is applied in the field in place of
chemical fertilizers. It is cheaper, locally available and without any kind of side effect.
4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS
Emphasis is given on developing backyard gardens to meet the day to day needs of the vegetables of the
villagers.
4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT
To meet the fuel, fodder, timber requirements
of the community and to increase the carrying
capacity of the degraded pastures, proper
fencing, planting and over seeding of grasses
like Dhaman, Sevan, Stylohameta is done on
Govt./Panchayat and Pasture lands.
Conservation measures are also adopted to
conserve soil and water. Contour furrows/
trenches are excavated on the contours and
pits are dug in the trenches for plantation.
4.4.2.7 FENCING
Fencing is necessary to protect the production measures and pastures developed on non arable lands.
The fencing is designed in such a way that it intercepts runoff and conserves rain water. Different types of
fencing are as under:
1. DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)
This is most popular method of fencing. A ditch of particular cross section considering the type of the soil is
dug around the pasture area. The aim is to prevent cattle from entering the protected area. The soil so
excavated is used for construction of a bund. It can be fortified with local species of vegetation.
2. STONE WALL FENCING
Stone wall fencing is done in area where stone is locally available especially in hilly areas. The stone
wall is constructed to prevent the cattle from entering the protected area.
4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES
4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION
Cultivation is done along the contours. This forms the mini barriers across the flow path of the runoff,
which conserves rain water in situ & check soil erosion. Effectiveness of contour cultivation varies with
slope, crop cover and soil. It is most effective on moderate slope ranging from 1 to 5%
4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE
Contour bunds are small earthen bunds constructed along the contour on the agriculture lands to
check soil erosion and conserve sufficient moisture to grow crops. These bunds are purified with locally
available vegetation like Khus, Munja, Dhaman and Stylo Hamata are raised on the bund.
4.4.3.3 V DITCH
These are constructed parallel to contour in areas of gentle slope to conserve in sito moisture and to
check velocity of run off.
4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES
Number of rows of trenches are dug in hilly areas having steep slopes. Distance between two
trenches is kept equal to the length of a trench. Adjacent rows are staggered to reduce the maximum
length of runoff for better retention. These trenches check the velocity of runoff as well as conserve in-situ
moisture and check soil erosion.
4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)
Tanka is a covered masonry runoff storage tank
which collects runoff water from artificial
catchment constructed around it. It is also an age
old practice in the desert areas and is used for
harvesting surface runoff water for life saving
irrigation and drinking purposes.
4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM
These structures are constructed in small and
medium size gullies using locally available
stones/ boulders as dry masonry. A waste weir is
also provided to discharge the peak runoff safely
from the catchment.
4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM
These are constructed in medium to large size gullies
by making earthen embankment in the nallah bed
across the drainage line duly supported by locally
available vegetation/ grass. They are provided where
separate surplus arrangement for water is available at
site.
4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)
It is a water harvesting structure constructed in middle to large drainage lines across the flow to store
surplus runoff . The pond is constructed near the point of use where maximum water can be stored
requiring minimum amount of earth work. The earthen bund is fortified with vegetation and waste
weir.
4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM
It is a weir like masonry structure constructed across the natural drain/ nallah which intercepts the
runoff from local catchment and stores it for optimum utilization. This helps in recharging of
surrounding wells. The stored water can also be used for lift or flow irrigation as well as for drinking
purposes of human and livestock population. Due to these direct and indirect benefits, masonry check
dam is in great demand in the rural areas.
CHAPTER - 5
AAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTYYYYYYYY WWWWWWWWIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSEEEEEEEE
AAAAAAAABBBBBBBBSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF CCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTT
Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project
fund
Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary
contribution
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 45.000 0.000 45.000 0.000
1 WDT MANDEYA
2 W C SEC MANDEYA
3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY &
OTHER)
SUB TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000
II MONITORING 1% 4.500 0.000 4.500 0.000
III EVALUATION 1% 4.500 0.000 4.500 0.000
54.000 0.000 54.000 0.000
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0.000 0.000 0.000
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.000 0.000 18.000 0.000
1 SOLAR LIGHT 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 WATER TANKA 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 REPAIRING OF TANKA 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 OTHER 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000
V TRAININGS & CAPACITY BUILDING 5% 22.500 0.000 22.500 0.000
1 USERS GROUP 0.000 0.000 0.000
(i) KHARIF 0.000 0.000 0.000
(ii) RABI 0.000 0.000 0.000
(iii) HORTICULTURE 0.000 0.000 0.000
(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT 0.000 0.000
2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.500 0.000 4.500
0.000 0.000
ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST
JODHPUR XVII
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
W/S WORK PHASE 0.000 0.000
VII NRM 60% 270.000 0.000 270.000
1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK 0.000
(i) Earthen Bund Ha. 13300 550 73.150 13.300 86.450 6.916
(ii) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 178 142.400 24.000 166.400 13.312
(iii) Waste weir No. 13000 28 3.640 2.600 6.240 0.499
(iv) Gulley Control Structure Nallah BundingNo. 10000 6 0.600 0.000 0.600 0.048
(v) Khadin No. 500000 4 20.000 0.000 20.000 1.600
2 NON ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
(i) V Ditch for PD Ha. 17900 10 1.790 0.000 1.790 0.000
(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 12700 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond No. 50000 10 10.000 0.000 10.000 0.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 20 16.000 1.600 17.600 0.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with ww No. 43000 4 0.920 0.000 0.920 0.000
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
(i) LSCD 'A' No. 20000 1 0.200 0.000 0.200 0.000
(ii) LSCD 'B' No. 18500 2 0.370 0.000 0.370 0.000
(iii) LSCD 'C' No. 17000 2 0.340 0.000 0.340 0.000
(iv) LSCD 'D' No. 15500 2 0.310 0.000 0.310 0.000
(v) LSCD 'E' No. 14000 2 0.280 0.000 0.280 0.000
(vi) Masonry Check Dam No. 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0 270.000 41.500 311.500 0.000
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO
ENTERPRISES 67.500 15% 0.000 0.000 0.000
For Arable Land 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 Arable bund Ha. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 Agro Forestry No. 73 4520 3.300 0.000 3.300 1.510
3Horticulture Plantation with fencing &
Tanka No. 24700 178 43.966 7.410 51.376 6.118
4Horticulture Plantation without fencing
(Orchard) No. 10000 25 2.500 0.500 3.000 1.600
TOTAL
5 Vermi Compost No. 36000 7 2.520 0.000 2.520 1.843
6 Crop Demonstration No. 2000 400 4.000 0.000 4.000 1.133
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden No. 1000 20 0.200 0.000 0.200 0.141
8 Medicinal Plants No. 3000 15 0.150 0.000 0.150 0.394
For Non-arable Land 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 V Ditch for PD Ha. 2200 10 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 900 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 Fencing of PD (by SW) Ha. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) Ha. 0 10 2.681 0.000 2.681 0.000
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING & REVOLVING
FUND OF SHG 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(i) KARIGER No. 26250 1 0.263 0.000 0.263
(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT No. 40500 1 0.405 0.000 0.405 0.000
(iii) TAILORING No. 67000 1 0.670 0.000 0.670 0.000
(iv) MASALA UDYOG No. 42200 1 0.422 0.000 0.422 0.000
(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE No. 34000 1 0.340 0.000 0.340 0.000
(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG No. 22000 1 0.220 0.000 0.220 0.000
(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG No. 50000 1 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.000
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
(i.) Animal Health Camp No. 25000 17 4.250 0.000 4.250 0.000
(ii) Vaccination 0 0 0.200 0.000 0.200 0.000
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada No. 25000 2 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.000
(iv) A I 0 0 0.194 0.000 0.194 0.000
0 0 67.500 7.910 75.410 0.000
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 13.50 3% 13.500 0.000 13.500 0.000
GRAND TOTAL 450.000 49.410 499.410 0.000
TOTAL
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER – 6
AAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNUUUUUUUUAAAAAAAALLLLLLLL AAAAAAAACCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN
PPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAANNNNNNNN
Name of the Project IWMP XVII Cluster Geographical Area 4094 Ha
G.P. Chandrakh Chandrakh Effective Area 3000 Ha
Block Baori IWMP Total Arable land Ha
District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 732 Ha
Village Covered 3 NO. 2. Unirrigated 1830 Ha
Project outlay 450 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha
Total Area 3000 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 8 1. Pasture 15 Ha
No. of WC's formed 1 No. of UG's formed 12 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 423 Ha
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 45
1 WDT MANDEYA
2 W C SEC MANDEYA
3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY & OTHER)
SUB TOTAL 45.000 45.000
II MONITORING 1% 4.500 4.500 4.500
III EVALUATION 1% 4.500 4.500 4.500
54.000 54.000
W/S PREPARATORY PHASE
IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 18.000 18.000
1 SOLAR LIGHT
2 WATER HARVESTING TANKA
3 REPAIRING OF TANKA
6 OTHER
18.000 18.000
VTRAININGS & CAPACITY
BUILDING 5% 22.500
1 USERS GROUP
(i) KHARIF
(ii) RABI
(iii) HORTICULTURE
(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT
2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO
22.500 22.500
VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 4.500 4.500 1 4.500 4.500
4.500 4.500 1 4.500 4.500
TOTAL 45.000 4.500 45.000
SECOND YEAR
TOTAL
FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEAR
Date of
Approval of
the work plan
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED JODHPUR XVII
FOURTH YEARFIRST YEARNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
S. N.
(YEAR WISE BREAK UP)
Macro/Micro
W C
TOTALTHIRD YEAR
Scheme/Batch
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
SECOND YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARFOURTH YEARFIRST YEARNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
S. N.TOTAL
THIRD YEAR
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM 60% 270.000 0.000 45.000 67.500 67.500 54.000 36.000 270.000
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 550 13300 73.150 0 0.000 100 13.300 180 23.940 170 22.610 70 9.310 30 3.990 550 73.150
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 178 80000 142.400 0 0.000 24 19.200 30 24.000 50 40.000 46 36.800 28 22.400 178 142.400
(iii) Waste weir 28 13000 3.640 0 0.000 4 0.520 22 2.860 1 0.130 1 0.130 0 0.000 28 3.640
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 6 10000 0.600 0 0.000 4 0.400 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.200 6 0.600
(v) Khadin 4 500000 20.000 0 0.000 1 6.240 2 7.970 1 3.760 0 1.360 0 0.670 4 20.000
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 10 17900 1.790 0 0.000 0.000 10 1.790 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.790
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 0 12700 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond 10 100000 10.000 0 0.000 3 3.000 2 2.000 1 1.000 0 0.000 4 4.000 10 10.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 20 80000 16.000 0 0.000 2 1.600 5 4.000 0 0.000 8 6.400 5 4.000 20 16.000
(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 4 23000 0.920 0 0.000 2 0.460 1 0.230 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.230 4 0.920
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 1 20000 0.200 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.200 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.200
(ii) LSCD 'B' 2 18500 0.370 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.185 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.185 2 0.370
(iii) LSCD 'C' 2 17000 0.340 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.170 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.170 2 0.340
(iv) LSCD 'D' 2 15500 0.310 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.155 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.155 2 0.310
(v) LSCD 'E' 2 14000 0.280 0 0.000 2 0.280 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.280
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
270.000 45.000 67.500 67.500 54.000 36.000 270.000
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 67.500
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
2 Agro Forestry 4520 73 3.300 0 0.000 300 0.219 600 0.438 500 0.365 500 0.365 2620 1.913 4520 3.300
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 178 24700 43.966 0 0.000 10 2.470 40 9.880 50 12.350 50 12.350 28 6.916 178 43.966
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 25 10000 2.500 0 0.000 0.000 3 0.300 5 0.500 5 0.500 12 1.200 25 2.500
5 Vermi Compost 7 36000 2.520 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.360 1 0.360 1 0.360 4 1.440 7 2.520
6 Crop Demonstration 400 1000 4.000 0 0.000 5 0.050 40 0.400 40 0.400 40 0.400 275 2.750 400 4.000
7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 20 1000 0.200 0 0.000 5 0.050 5 0.050 0 0.000 10 0.100 0 0.000 20 0.200
8 Medicinal Plants 15 1000 0.150 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 5 0.050 10 0.100 0 0.000 15 0.150
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
SECOND YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEARFOURTH YEARFIRST YEARNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
S. N.TOTAL
THIRD YEAR
For Non-arable Land 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
1 V Ditch for PD 10 2200.000 0.220 0 0.000 0.000 10 0.220 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 0.220
2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0 0.000 0.000 10 2.681 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681
1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &
REVOLVING FUND OF SHG
(i) KARIGER 1 26250 0.263 0 0.000 1 0.263 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.263
(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 1 40500 0.405 0 0.000 0.000 1 0.405 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.405
(iii) TAILORING 1 67000 0.670 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.670 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.670
(iv) MASALA UDYOG 1 42200 0.422 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.422 0 0.000 1 0.422
(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 1 34000 0.340 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.340 0 0.000 1 0.340
(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 1 22000 0.220 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.220 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.220
(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 1 50000 0.500 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.500 1 0.500
2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0
(i.) Animal Health Camp 17 25000 4.250 0 0.000 2 0.500 4 1.000 5 1.250 5 1.250 1 0.250 17 4.250
(ii) Vaccination 0.200 0 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.050 0.050 0.000 0 0.200
(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 2 25000 0.500 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.250 0.000 0.250 2 0.500
(iv) A I 0.194 0 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.040 0.040 0.014 0 0.194
67.500 0.000 3.552 15.934 16.505 16.277 15.233 67.500
IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 13.500 13.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.100 5.400 13.500
GRAND TOTAL 450.000 4.500 53.052 83.434 84.005 78.377 56.633 450.000
TOTAL
QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN
W/S WORK PHASE
VII NRM
1ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) Earthen Bund 100 13300 13.300 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 40 5.320 50 6.650 0 0.000 10 1.330 100 13.300
(ii) WHS (Tanka) 30 80000 24.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 5 4.000 5 4.000 15 12.000 5 4.000 30 24.000
(iii) Waste weir 20 13000 2.600 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 11 1.430 4 0.520 3 0.390 2 0.260 20 2.600
(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah
Bunding 0 10000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(v) Khadin 0 455000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION
WORK
(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for
PD 0 12700 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iii) Dug out Pond 0 50000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.800 1 0.800 0.000 0 0.000 2 1.600
(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 0 23000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT
(i) LSCD 'A' 0 20000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(ii) LSCD 'B' 0 18500 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iii) LSCD 'C' 0 17000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(iv) LSCD 'D' 0 15500 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(v) LSCD 'E' 0 14000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
41.500 0.000 0.000 11.550 11.970 12.390 5.590 41.500
VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &
MICRO ENTERPRISES
For Arable Land
1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
2 Agro Forestry 0 73 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
3Horticulture Plantation with
fencing & Tanka 30 24700 7.410 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 5 1.235 5 1.235 10 2.470 10 2.470 30 7.410
4Horticulture Plantation without
fencing (Orchard) 5 10000 0.500 0.000 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200 1 0.100 1 0.100 5 0.500
7.910 0.000 0.000 1.335 1.435 2.570 2.570 7.910
GRAND TOTAL 49.410 0.000 0.000 12.885 13.405 14.960 8.160 49.410
TOTAL
TOTAL
SECOND YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL
FIRST YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR
YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED JODHPUR XVII (Through Convergence)
S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET
Jodhpur XV
CHAPTER - 7
TTTTTTTTEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCAAAAAAAALLLLLLLL DDDDDDDDEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGNNNNNNNN
&&&&&&&& EEEEEEEESSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Total Area 550 haNo. of Waste Weir 28
Name of work Conservation
Measure
Production
Measure
Total Cost
Earthen Bund 7315000 0 7315000Waste Weir 364000 0 364000.00
7679000 0 7679000.00
Say 76.79 Lakh
Conservation Measure 7679000.00Production Measure 0.00
Abstract of Cost
VEGETATIVE EARTHEN BUND IN ARABLE LAND
CROSS-SECTION OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
Top width =Based on seepage line checkSlope of seepage line 3:1
0.61.5 :1
1 :1 USDS 1
0.6
1 1.50.1 1.8 1.2 0.45 m
3.14.11 m
CS = (Tw+Bw) *HtCS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht2
CS = 1.85 Sq.m.
Average Cross section 1.85 Sq.m.Length 1.00 m.Quantity 1.85 Cu.m.
DESIGN OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
V.I = 0.305 (XS+Y)
0.305(0.8 x 2+1.0)
V.I = 0.549
V.I Vertical interval
X= Rain Fall Factor 0.80.8
Y= Factor due to soil infiltration & Crop cover 11
S= Percent slope 21
He= (Re x VI)1/2
(50) 1/2
He= 0.6199 Say 0.60 m
He Depth of impounding
Re 24Hour rainfall excess in Cms. for 10 year recurrence interval 35
V.I Vertical interval 0.549
Total Height of Bund = 0.6 + 0.4 1.00 m
Top width of Bund = 0.6 m
Bottom width of Bund = 3.1 m
Cross section of bund = (Top width of Bund +Bottom width of Bund) x Height
2X Section= ( 0.60+3.1) x 1.00
2
X Section= 1.85 Sq.m.
Construction of Waste Weir
DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST
L B D/H Feet Metre Lab Total Lab Total
1 2 9.5 2 2 76
4 2 2 2 32
1 8.75 2.5 2 43.75
0
0
151.75 4.29453 cum. 92.00 92.00 395.096 395.096
2 2 9.5 2 0.5 19
4 2 2 0.5 8
1 8.75 2.5 0.5 10.938
0
Excavation in hard soil dry or moist &
disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m
including dressing etc. complete. (2
B)
Cement concrete well mixed in
cement mortar ( 1 : 5 : 10 ) laid in
position complete including
curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,
HB (11 B)
Quantity Unit Rate AmountS.
No.Item No. Detail
0
0
37.938 1.07363 cum. 327.60 1576.00 351.722 1692.04
3 2 9.5 1.5 1.5 42.75
4 2 1.5 1.5 18
1 9.25 2.5 1.5 34.688
0
95.438 2.70088 cum. 473.00 1704.00 1277.52 4602.3
4 2 6 1.25 3.25 48.75
4 2 1.25 2 20
1 9.5 2 1 19
9 3
87.75 2.48333 cum. 628.30 1862.00 1560.27 4623.95
5 1 9.5 3 1 28.5
0
28.5 2.64765 Sq.m 120.50 291.00 319.042 770.466
Dry Stone kharanja (15 to 23 cm)
Item 100(A)
Random rubble stone masonary in
cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
Random rubble stone masonary in
cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
HB (11 B)
6 2 13 1.25 1 32.5
4 2 1.25 1 10
1 9.5 1.5 1 14.25
1 9.5 1 1 9.5
66.25 6.15463 sqm. 45.60 89.00 280.651 547.762
7 2 6 3.25 1 39
4 2 2 1 16 1.4864 sqm.
1 9.5 1.25 1 11.875
66.875 6.21269 sqm. 45.80 56.00 284.541 347.911
4468.84 12979.5
Rate
Skilled labour 400
Unskilled labour 135
Water A 4468.84
B 8510.69Material
15.29 2064 Amount
-116 Labour
4469
Quantity Amount
6.30 2521
Cement plaster including smooth
finishing in cement mortar (1:6) 20
mm thick.
Ruled pointing in cement mortar
(1:3)
B 8510.69
Cement 2 C 12979.5
Cement 2 20
Total (C+D) 12999.5
Say 13000
S.
No Rate Amount
1 Sand Cu.m. 380 858.852
2 Stone Agg of 40 mm nominal size Cu.m. 350 338.194
3 Stone Cu.m. 575 3279.01
4 Cement Kg 220 2601.86 11.827 Bag
7224.07
Other (Water) 1286.62
Total 8510.69
Material
2.260137
1.0
5.7
591.33
Add contingency
Unit Quantity
Total
4469
3Construction of Waste Weir
CROSS SECTION AT A A'
1.5
3.25 '
1 '
2.5
9.0 '
2
1' 6"
A A'A A'
2.5
9.5
PLAN
Estimate of One ha.
Length per ha. = 80 mtr
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length
Width
(TW+BW)/
2 Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Earth work Excavation for making of
bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,
breaking of clods, sorting of grass
pebbles, disposal of excavated
material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead
ESTIMATE OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND
material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead
up to 50 m including dressing and
compaction 119 B 1 80 1.85 1 148.00 Cum 85 12580.0
2 Sowing of seeds on the constructed
bund in three rows
114 3 80 240 meter 0.6 144
3 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman seed @ 4 gm
/ m in three rows
CAZRI
Rate
3 80 0.96 Kg 150 144
12868.0Add 3% contingency 386.0
Total 13254.0Say 13300.0
Conservation Measure 13300.0Production Measure 0
For General & OBC Category
Project Contribution
90% 10%
1 Cost of tanka 80000 72000 8000 80000Conservation measure
for water harvesting
60% 40%
2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 6000 4000 10000 Production
3 Barbed Wire Fencing 14700 8820 5880 14700 Production
Total 2+3 24700 14820 9880 24700
Total Cost of tanka unit 104700 86820 17880 104700
No. of Farmers
80 8376000 6945600 1430400 8376000
For SC/ST/ BPL
Project Contribution
95% 5%
1Cost of tanka 80000.00 76000 4000 80000
Conservation measure
for water harvesting
80% 20%
2Cost of Horticulture plantation 10000 8000 2000 10000 Production
3 Barbed Wire Fencing 14700 11760 2940 14700 Production
Total 2+3 24700 19760 4940 24700
Total Cost of tanka unit 104700.00 95760.00 8940.00 104700.00
No. of Farmers
98 10260600 9384480 876120 10260600
Total Cost 18636600
1 Conservation Measure 14240000
2 Production Measure 4396600
a From project 3122080
b From Contribution 1274520
3 Total Contribution 1439340.00
Abstract of cost of Tanka with Plantation work
Name of workSr. no
Sr. no Name of work
Estimated
cost MeasuresTotal
Estimated
cost Total Measures
Area 0.17 Ha Length 164.9 mtr. Spacing 4 m
Say 165 mtr.
No of post As per length= Length/spacing 41.00
Additional post require after every 10 Posts 4
45.00
Length of Post 7.5 Feet 2.286 m
Width of post 1 Feet 0.3 m
Quantity of one post 0.6858 Sq.m
S.No Description Item no. NoLength of
single wire
Total
lengthKg/mtr Quantity Unit Rate Amount
1 Supply of barbed wire fencing 14
gauge 5 165 825 0.08 66 Kg 46 3036
2 Supply of Jodhpur stone slab for
post 45 30.86 Sq.m 300 9258.30
3 Rehandling of posts to pit LS 45 45.00 No 15 675.00
4 fixing of post in 45 cm. deep pit2B 45 0.45 0.3 0.45 2.73 Cum 92 251.51
5 Cost of binding wire 6 Kg 45 270.00
6 Stretching of barbed wire and fixing
it with the post with thin wire
5.5/forest 825 mtr 0.92 759
7 interlacing the barbed wire with
locally available bushy material at a
spacing of 15 cms 5.6/forest 45 45 mtr 5.48 246.6
14249.81
Add 3% contingency 427.49
14677.30
Say 14700.0
Model estimate Barbed wire fencing
Model Estimate of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)
Amount : 80000.00
Capacity 25740.72 Ltr.
Dia B H
1 Complete O/O 1 13.00 12.50 Aagor Dia > 42 Feet
2 Hall I/I 1 10.50 11.75 3.00 3.2
5 E/W 1 132.707 1 10.50 3.50 3.2004
6 Concrete 1 132.707 1 0.50 2.00 25.74072
7 Masonary 1 36.9068 1.25 12.00 2.00
8 G.L to P.L 1 2.00
9 Aslat Around 2.00 9.00 1 0.5
12 Door 1 1.50 1.50 1
13 Ventilater -2 1 1 1
S.N
o Details of work No.
Measurements
lk/kkj.k@eqyk;e feêh esa
l[r] fpduh] dadj feêh esa
fo?kfVr pêku
lk/kkj.k pêku
13 Ventilater -2 1 1 1
16 Flooring in side Cement 1 86.546 1 1
17 Flooring on top Cement 1 132.71 1 1
Deduction 1 1.5 1.5 1
DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST
0 Model Estimate of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)
0 0
y- pkS- Åa@x- QhV dqy eh- Je dqy Je dqy
1 0
0
0
0
dz-la- dk;Z dk fooj.k la- fo'ks"k fooj.k ek=k bZdkbZ nj jkf'k
uhao] [kkbZ rFkk ukyk vkfn ds fy, 1-5 eh-xgjkbZ rd feêh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dksdqVuk] ikuh Mkyuk cxy dks laokjuk] [kqnhfeêh dks ckgj fudkyuk uhoa Hkjus ds ckn[kkyh LFkkuksa dks iqu% feêh ls Hkjuk rFkk cphgqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k
0
0
0
¼v½ lk/kkj.k@eqyk;e feêh esa 1 132.707 1 3 398.122 11.27 cum. 75.00 75.00 845.25 845.25
¼c½ l[r] fpduh] dadj feêh esa 1 132.707 1 3.5 464.475 13.15 cum. 92.00 92.00 1209.8 1209.80
¼l½ fo?kfVr pêku 1 132.707 1 2 265.415 7.51 cum. 134.00 134.00 1006.34 1006.34
¼n½ lk/kkj.k pêku 1 132.707 1 2 265.415 7.51 cum. 178.00 178.00 1336.78 1336.78
lk/kkj.k@eqyk;e feêh esa 1 131.922 1.5 1 197.883 5.6 cum. 75.00 75.00 420 420
1-5 ehVj vfrfjDr mBku (Lift)
First lift 1 132.707 0.0929 1.5 18.4928 cum. 10.80 10.80 199.72176 199.7218
Second lift 0 132.707 0.0929 0.2 0 cum. 21.60 21.60 0 0
2 1 132.707 1 0.5 66.3536
0
gqbZ feêh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.kdjuk
lhesUV dkaØhV uhao ;k Q'kZ esa 40 fe- eh- ukeh; eki dh iRFkj fxÍh@bZV fxÍh] lhesUV & jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV % 5 jsr % 10 fxÍh vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] 0
0
0
66.3536 1.87 cum. 372.60 1576.00 696.762 2947.12
3
0 1170.83 1 0.5 0
1 131.922 1.5 0.5 98.9415
98.9415 2.8 ?ku eh- 242.40 711.00 678.72 1990.80
4 1 36.9068 1.25 12 553.601
0
553.601 15.67 cum. 473.00 1704.00 7411.91 26701.68
5 1 131.92 1.5 0.5 98.9415
1 131.92 1.25 2 329.805
vuqikr eas feykdj Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk] rjkbZ lesrA
uhao es 40 fe-eh- ukeh; eki ds lkFk 40 izfr'kr xkjs feêh dks feykdj Mkyuk vkSj dwVukA
iRFkj dh fxêh ds lkFk
uhao rFkk dqlhZ es iRFkj dh os j)k&<+ksdk lhesaV&ctjh 1 % 6 elkys es] e; cxy dh f>jh cUn djuk rFkk rjkbZ vkfnA
uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa iRFkj dh os j)k&<ksdk fpukbZ] xkjk elkys esasaA
428.747 12.13 cum. 473.00 1235.00 5737.49 14980.55
6
ikV 2 9 1 0.5 9
;ksx 9 0.250 cum. 1188.90 4066.00 297.225 1016.50
7 1 132.707 1 1 132.707
0
dVksfr;ka -1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25
130.457 12.11 sqm. 263.50 659.00 3190.985 7980.49
8 1 132.707 1 1 132.707
-1 1.5 1.5 1 -2.25
130.457 12.11 sqm. 116.50 303.00 1410.815 3669.33
9 1 86.5463 1 1 86.5463
1 131.922 1.25 1 164.903
iRFkj ds fljny ¼fyVay½ dh vkiwfrZ dj]fpukbZ es mi;ksx dh xbZ elkys es mls yxkukA
viqzOM [kku dh iVVh dh Nr Nr ds nksuks dsrjQ fles.V 1:4 ls Hkjuk
lhes.V dadjhV 1:2:4 dh Nr dk dk;Z 20 feehfxVVh
lhes.V dadjhV 1:2:4 dh Q'kZ dk dk;Z 20feeh fxVVh
1 131.922 1.25 1 164.903
251.449 23.35 sqm. 91.10 212.00 2127.185 4950.20
10 1 32.9805 1 11.75 387.521
387.521 36 sqm. 77.70 134.00 2797.2 4824.00
11 1 40.833 1 2.5 102.083
1 135.805 1 2 271.61
1 127.955 1 2 255.91
629.603 58.49 sqm. 45.80 56.00 2678.842 3275.44
12 1 1.5 1.5 1 2.25
feeh fxVVh
lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1:6 vuqikr eslhesaV&ctjh feykdj dj tksMksa dks dqjsnusrFkk rjkbZ lfgr 25 fe-eh- esaA
iRFkj dh pqukbZ ij lhes.V elkyk 1:3 ls Vhiksdk dk;Z
22 xst dh lknk ,e- ,l- pn~nj ds 1 eh- x2 eh- nks iYys okys njokts] ftlesa yksgs dh40x40x3 fe-eh- ds dksfu;k yksgs dh pkSjoV rFkkiYyks esa 25x25x3 fe-eh- ds dksfu;k yksgs( (Angle Iron) ds fdukjs fn, x, uD'ks dsvuqlkj e; vxZy fpVduh rFkk idM+ ifê;ksad
2.25 0.2 sqm. 0.00 LS 100 500.00
13 vU; vko';drk vuqlkj dk;Z 0
0
0 200 2000
32345.03 79854.00
79854.00
Rate
Skilled labour 400
Unskilled labour 135 JeA 32345.03
Water lkexzh B 47508.98
dqyC 79854
146
dqy ;ksx (C+D) 80000
d
Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc
Quantity Amount
42.20 16881 jkf'k
89.63 12100
3364
32345
Add for contingency
dz-la- dqy lkexzh vko';drk nj jkf'k
1 jsr@ctjh ?k-eh- 400 3684.78
2 fxêh iRFkj dh 40 fe-eh- ukeh; eki dh ?k-eh- 425 1905.28
3 fxêh iRFkj dh 20 fe-eh- ukeh; eki dh ?k-eh- 580 960.625
4 iRFkj ?k-eh- 650 19877
5 lhesUV fd-xzk- 260 12496.4 48.063
6 iRFkj ds fljny 15 ls-eh- eksVkbZ rd ?k-eh- 2700 675
7 iRFkj dh ifê;ka o-eh- 340 4529.14
8 QsDVªh esa cus njokts o-eh- 2000.00 400
9 xkjk&feêh ?k-eh- 83.00 445.337
44973.5
vU; 2535.45
47509
bZdkbZ ek=k
9.21
4.48
1.66
30.58
2403.1
0.25
13.32
0.200
5.366
Silt Trap, Jali, Hand Pump etc
dqy ;ksx
iapk;r lfefr ckoMh
VkaWds dh MªkbZx
gSa.M iai
<Ddu 1.5' x 1.5'
2'
42
csjÌk iRFkj dh <ksdk pqukb xkjs
es
flesaUV dadjhV
¼1%2%4½Vkads dk vkxkSj
2.00 2'
2' 10.5tehu ry
65'
flesaUV dadjhV
¼1%2%4½
csjÌk iRFkj dh <ksdk
pqukbZ(1:6) 1'3" eksVkbZ
2' 10.51'
tehu ry1'
3' 10.5011.75
flesaUV dadjhV ¼1%4%8½
6"
13.00
Design of Water Harvesting Structure (tanka)
Collection of Water = Area * rainfall* 80% Capacity as per Structural design
Catchment Area = ^4*D2
D= 11.70 Cum= ^4*Dt2 * Hight
= 107.46 Sqm Dt= Inner diameter of tanka
Rainfall = 0.3 Mtr Dt= 3.2 3.2004
Hight = 3.20
Collection of water = 25.79 Cum
25.7261 Cum
Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000
= 25790 = 25726.1
Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by water
Production
Total capacity of tanka 25726.1 Ltr
Use of water for drinking purpose 40% 10290.4 Ltr
Available water for plantation 60% 15435.7 Ltr
One watering require 15 Ltr
No. of watering per Year 20 No
Total Ltr require per plant per year 300 Ltr
No of plant can survive = Available water for Plantation/ water require per plant per year
= 51.45
say 50 plant
Area- 0.17 Ha
No. of Plants - 50
Year No./Year
1 Earth work Excavation in hard soil dry
or moist and disposal of excavated
meterial within initial lift of 1.5 mt
height and lead of 50 metre.Digging of
pit
2(B)
1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.22 cum. 92 19.87 993.60
2 Apply of manure
(A) Compost Khad5.00 kg. 0.4 2.00 100.00
(B) S.S.P. (16%)1.00 kg. 4 4.00 200.00
(C) Endosulphan (4%) 100 gm 0.10 kg. 30 3.00 150.00
3 Plant cost LS1 1.00 No 20 20.00 1000.00
4 Planting of plant 113(B)1.00 No. 3 3.00 150.00
5 Watering of plants (15 litre) 115 3 20 60.00 No. 1.8 108.00 5400.00
6 Making of Thawla atleast 50 cm radius 117(B) 2 1 2.00 No. 1.8 3.60 180.00
7 Weeding & hoeing of plants 45 cm
radius and 15 cm deep
1163
1 3.00 No. 1.2 3.60 180.00
Amount for
50 Plants
Model estimate of Horticulture Plantation in Arable land
Length Width Height Qty UnitS.
No
Description Item
No.
Total Rate Amount
Year No./Year
Amount for
50 Plants
Length Width Height Qty UnitS.
No
Description Item
No.
Total Rate Amount
8 Spray
(A) Endosulphan (35 ec) 3 0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 420.00
(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 600.00
9 Transportation of Plant from Jodhpur 70
km including loading and unloading
LS
1.00 no 2 3.00 150.00
10 Protection of plants from frost / loo
using grass or other locally available
material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m dia.
Of plant height and covering the plant.
Forest
bsr
1 1 1.00 no 3.56 3.56 178.00
TOTAL 187.47 9701.60
Add 3% contingency 291.048
Total 9992.65
say 10000.0
Name of Work :- Khadin - I
INTRODUCTION :
OBJECT :
The adventage of constructing such structure is:-
1. When rainfall is inadequate kharif can be taken
2. When rainfall is sufficient both kharif and rabi crop can be raised.
3. If the rainfall is in the latter end of the monsoon the water can be used for rabi
TECHNICAL REPORT
To conserve the moisture in the soil profile KHADIN’s are constructed as a bund across the slop on flater lands so that
runoff is spread over a larger cultivable area, this will improve soil fertility, check soil erosion. While selecting the site
preference is given to the fields owned by the weaker sections of the society.
The problem can be solved upto certain extent by constructing different structures for harvesting the runoff water
which will increase the production. Construction of different structure will reduce the siol erosion and conserve the moisture in
the soil. The rabi crop can be taken by conserving the moisture in the soil. KHADIN is one of the water harvesting structure
which will reduce the soil erosion , provide labour employment in the area and increases the production by conserving the
moisture in the soil profile.
In arid and semi arid region rainfall is erratic, scanty and insuffcient for crops. In this region frequent famine conditions
prevalls which causses mass migration of humen and cattle population in search of food, fodder and water for servival.
GENERAL FEATURES :
SOIL DESCREPTION :
JUSTIFICATION :
CROPING PATTERN :
The crop can be taken in the submerged area kharif / rabi season depending on monsoon which is going to benefit the
cultivators.The major crops growing in the area are Bajra, Moong, Moth and Til etc. in kharif season. The present cropping pattern is
followed by cultivators as they have to depend upon rains. But the cropping pattern will be changed after harvesting the runoff water in
the KHADIN.
The KHADIN area is having gentle slop of 0.2% average with slop direction towards South–East to North – West. The cimate
of the area is hot and dry. The maximum temperature recorded in summer is 43°C to 47°C and in winter 20°C to 40°C. In summer
hot dusty winds blows in the area with high velocity. The annual rainfall is about 300mm which is low and erratic. The ground water in
the area is very deep having depth 100m to 150m.
The soils of this area are deep to very deep coarse to medium textured and are moderately to well drained. This KHADIN
area soil type is loamy - sand. After water impounding in the KHADIN area soils are likely to be converted to sandy -loam type.
The catchment area is 125 ha.which can be clasified 125 ha. average – catchment. The area do not have any problem of
salinity / alknity.
The KHADIN work has been sanctioned in Jodhpur-XVII. An amount of Rs 4.5lacs as per enclosed abstract estimate is
required for this work. The estimates of KHADIN work are prepared on the basis of Gramin Kariya Nirdeshika 2010. The proposed
submergence area of the KHADIN is 9 Hact. The maximum height of the KHADIN bund as per design plan is 1.48 m.with storage
capacity of 2.1 X 10^4 Cum. The mandays to be generated are 6429 no.
2 Submergence area Hect.
3 Average Rainfall 12”
4 Rainfall intensity 5 cm / hr
5 Side slope U/s 2.5 : 1 D/s 1.5 : 1
6 Seepage line slope 5 :1
7 Expected runoff from the catchment area Q from strang table at 12” rainfall
where catchment is = mcft / Sqm
Q = (1.296 X 10000 X0.0393 X 125 ) / 2.589
= Cum
Lowest level of the filed boundry =
8 Capacity of the khadin upto F.T.L. it is calculated by following formula
A) V0 = H/3 (A0+A1+ v A0 X A1) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the lowest
= 0.30 / 3 ( 0.00 + 2.40 + 0.00 X 2.40 ) level of the boundry & First contour
= 0.24 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.30
A0= .Area of lower leevel of the boundry = 0.00 Hact
A1= Area of 1st contour = 2.40 Hact
B) V1 = H/3 (A1+A2+ v A1 X A2) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the First contour
= 0.25 / 3 ( 2.40 + 5.30 + 2.40 X 5.30 ) level & Second contour level
= 0.94 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.25
A1= .Area of the First contour = 2.40 Hact
A2= Area of the Second contour = 5.30 Hact
D E S I G N O F K H A D I N
8.22
1.296
24519
9.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
C) V2 = H/3 (A2+A3+ v A2 X A3) Where V2 = Capicity of the area covered by the Second contour
= 0.13 / 3 ( 5.30 + 9.00 + X 9.00 ) level & Third contour level
= 0.92 X10 4 H = Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.13
A3= = Area of the Third contour = 9.0 Hact
Therefore V = V0+V1+V2
V = 0.24 + 0.94 + 0.92 )X 10 4
V = 2.10 X10 4
Crossection of the Khadin bund at maximum depth of submergence
Depth of the submergence = m Depth of flow over the crest = m
Free board = 1.5 X Hw in meter Where Hw = 0.014 (df)½
FB = 1.5 X Hw = 1.5X Depth of submergence
FB = % of slop of basin in meter
But proposed is 0.50 m df = ( / )X 100
= m
Total height of Khadin bund = m Hw = 0.014 ( ) ½
Hw =
Top width of bund = h /5 +1.5 or / 5 +1.5 = But proposed is m
Side slop U/S 2.5 :1 :1 Base width = ( X5 ) + 2.00 = m
Seepage line check –
Seepage line Width = Maximum impounding depth (up to F.T.L.)X (Seepage line slope + up stream side slop)
= X( 5.00 + 3.0 ) = 5.44
Base width > Seepage line width i.e. >
Hence design is safe
Length of pipe
The pipe (RCC) is placed at lowest level of the bund , length of pipe is required = 10.00 m
7.92 5.44
0.333
2.00
566.67
0.333
566.67
df =
1.48
1.48
7.92
0.68
1.80
1.48D/S 1.5
5.30
0.300.68
0.68 0.12
0.500
For the design of the crest lenth of the weste weir following formula is used
Q = Peak rate of discharge
C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = 0.30
I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recuring interval
= 5 cm / hour
A= Catchment area = Hact.
Therefor Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A.
= 0.0276 X 0.30 X 5 X
=
Hence L = Q / (1.71 X h 3 /2 )
Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec
h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt.
L = Lenth of crest in meter
= / ( 1.71 X (0.30)3/2 )
= / 0.28
=
But Proposed is 30.00mt
W A S T E W E I R
5.16
18.43
5.16
125
125
5.16
1 Name of Village
2 Panchayat Samiti
4 Name of work
5 No of beneficiries
6 Submerged area (Hect.) 9.00 Hect.
7 Total capicity of W.H.S. 20978 Cum
8 Soil texture
9 Imperevious layer at depth
10 Average rainfall (mm)
11 Maximum rainfall (mm)
12 Flood lift
13 Cost of W.H.S.
14 Labour component
15 Material component
16 Per hect. Cost of W.H.S.
17 Employment Man days 6375
50000.00
Raikoriya
Baori
Khadin
67500.00
S U M M A R Y 0 F KHADIN
382500.00
12”
5 cm/hr
0.30 m
450000.00
6
Sandy – Loam
10 m
1 Layout of Bund 1820.00 0.25 M. 455.00
2 Clearance of Jungle 5609.60 1.40 Sq.M. 7853.44
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15
cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of
excavated material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m
including dressing and compaction
4238.05 85.00 Cu.M. 360234.08
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10.00 600.00 M. 6000.00
5 Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri
and kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated
material within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including
dressing etc. complete.
32.83 92.00 Cu.M. 3020.54
6 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in
position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,
HB
8.21 1756.00 Cu.M. 14413.25
7 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
)For foundation
18.12 1618.00 Cu.M. 29313.31
8 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )
For superstructure
3.00 1776.00 Cu.M. 5320.27
9 Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4 19.40 212.00 Sq.M. 4111.74
10 Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3) 10.65 56.00 Sq.M. 596.26
11 Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm) 27.26 670.00 Cu.M. 18260.85
TOTAL 449578.74
450000.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
ABSTRACT OF COST (KHADIN)
Say Rs.
KHADIN
1 Layout of Bund X 2 = 1820.0 1820.0 M.
2 Clearance of Jungle X 6.37 = 5609.6 5609.6 Sq.M.
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,
breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of excavated 4238.05 Cu.M.
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10 M.
5 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 0.72
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.592
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 5.04
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.88
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 21.6
32.832 32.832 Cu.M.
6 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.18
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.648
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 1.26
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.72
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 5.4
8.208 8.208 Cu.M.
7 1 X 1.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.225
4 X 0.75 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.675
1 X 1.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.180
4 X 0.60 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.432
1 X 7.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 1.575
2 X 2.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.900
1 X 30.0 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 6.750
1 X 7.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 1.260
Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri and
kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including dressing etc. complete.
10M.
4238.05
910
880
DETAILS OF WORK (KHADIN)
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
KHADIN
Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in
position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm, HB
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
2 X 2.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.720
1 X 30.0 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 5.400
18.117 18.117 Cu.M.
8 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 X 1.00 = 0.450
3 X 0.45 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.182
1 X 0.45 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.081
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.540
= 2.025
3.278
4 X 3.14 / 4.00 X 0.3^2 = 0.283
2.996 2.996 Cu.M.
9 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 = 0.450
1 X 0.60 X 0.45 = 0.270
1 X 30.0 X 0.45 = 13.500
1 X 7.50 X 0.45 = 3.375
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 = 1.800
19.395 19.395 Sq.M.
10 2 X( 1.00 $ 0.45 )X 1.00 = 2.900
3 X( 4.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.45 = 2.430
2 X( 0.60 $ 0.45 )X 0.60 = 1.260
2 X( 2.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.30 = 0.540
1 X 7.00 X 0.30 = 2.100
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 0.7 = 1.418
10.648 10.648 Sq.M.
11 1 X 30.0 X 2.00 X 0.23 = 13.80
1 X 10.0 X 1.80 X 0.23 = 4.14
1 X 15.0 X 2.70 X 0.23 = 9.32
27.26 27.26 Cu.M.
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4
Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3)
Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm)
level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum
0 9.80 9.80 0.00 2.00 2.5:1 1.5:1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
40 9.70 0.10 2.40 0.22 0.11 40 4.40
80 9.62 0.18 2.72 0.42 0.32 40 12.90
120 9.40 0.40 3.60 1.12 0.77 40 30.90
160 8.96 0.84 5.36 3.09 2.11 40 84.22
200 8.70 1.10 6.40 4.62 3.86 40 154.22
240 8.64 1.16 6.64 5.01 4.82 40 192.62
280 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.15 40 205.82
320 8.62 1.18 6.72 5.14 5.21 40 208.50
360 8.64 1.16 6.64 5.01 5.08 40 203.12
400 8.65 1.15 6.60 4.95 4.98 40 199.12
440 8.55 1.25 7.00 5.63 5.29 40 211.40
480 8.45 1.35 7.40 6.35 5.99 40 239.40
520 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 6.92 40 276.90
560 8.22 1.58 8.32 8.15 7.83 40 313.06
600 8.25 1.55 8.20 7.91 8.03 40 321.16
640 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 7.70 40 308.10
680 8.42 1.38 7.52 6.57 7.03 40 281.38
720 8.49 1.31 7.24 6.05 6.31 40 252.42
760 8.61 1.19 6.76 5.21 5.63 40 225.29
800 8.68 1.12 6.48 4.75 4.98 40 199.22
840 8.84 0.96 5.84 3.76 4.26 40 170.24
880 8.90 0.90 5.60 3.42 3.59 40 143.66
140.24 4238.05
Average base width = 6.37
KHADIN
Earth work chart
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Series1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880
Series2 9.80 9.70 9.62 9.40 8.96 8.70 8.64 8.60 8.62 8.64 8.65 8.55 8.45 8.30 8.22 8.25 8.30 8.42 8.49 8.61 8.68 8.84 8.90
Series3 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80
Series4 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30
Series5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
L-Section of Khadin
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 8.208 26.27 3.69 7.39 -
2 Copping in C.C. (1:2:4) 19.395 6.05 0.43 0.87 -
3 Massonary in Cement 21.113 22.59 6.33 - 23.22
Mortar ( 1:8 )
4 Pointing in Cement 10.648 0.30 0.03 - -
Mortar ( 1:3 )
5 Dry Stone Pitching 27.255 - - - 29.98
6 R.C.C. Cement Pipe 2 Nos.
TOTAL 55.21 10.49 8.26 53.20
Say Bags 55
Stone
CumITEMS.No.
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENTQuantity
Cum / Sqm
Cement
Begs
Sand
Cum
Aggrigate
Cum
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
0.15
G.L.
0.45
0.45
0.6
0.15
1.0
0.45
EARTHEN STRUCTURE
G.L.
2.0M
0.075
0.9
0.15
0.451.00 0.60
2.50
0.15
ELEVATION
PLAN
0.30
0.075
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
2
U/S
DRAWING OF SIDE WASTE-WEIR FOR LOW COSTING KHADINS
2.0
M
1
5.2
30 M
SID
E V
IEW
30.00
2
D/S
2.0
M
0.8
30 M
SID
E V
IEW
PLAN
30.00
Name of Work :- Khadin - II
INTRODUCTION :
OBJECT :
The adventage of constructing such structure is:-
1. When rainfall is inadequate kharif can be taken
2. When rainfall is sufficient both kharif and rabi crop can be raised.
3. If the rainfall is in the latter end of the monsoon the water can be used for rabi
TECHNICAL REPORT
To conserve the moisture in the soil profile KHADIN’s are constructed as a bund across the slop on flater lands
so that runoff is spread over a larger cultivable area, this will improve soil fertility, check soil erosion. While selecting the
site preference is given to the fields owned by the weaker sections of the society.
The problem can be solved upto certain extent by constructing different structures for harvesting the runoff water
which will increase the production. Construction of different structure will reduce the siol erosion and conserve the
moisture in the soil. The rabi crop can be taken by conserving the moisture in the soil. KHADIN is one of the water
harvesting structure which will reduce the soil erosion , provide labour employment in the area and increases the
production by conserving the moisture in the soil profile.
In arid and semi arid region rainfall is erratic, scanty and insuffcient for crops. In this region frequent famine
conditions prevalls which causses mass migration of humen and cattle population in search of food, fodder and water
for servival.
GENERAL FEATURES :
SOIL DESCREPTION :
JUSTIFICATION :
CROPING PATTERN :
The crop can be taken in the submerged area kharif / rabi season depending on monsoon which is going to benefit the
cultivators.The major crops growing in the area are Bajra, Moong, Moth and Til etc. in kharif season. The present cropping pattern is
followed by cultivators as they have to depend upon rains. But the cropping pattern will be changed after harvesting the runoff water in
the KHADIN.
The KHADIN area is having gentle slop of 0.2% average with slop direction towards South–East to North – West. The cimate
of the area is hot and dry. The maximum temperature recorded in summer is 43°C to 47°C and in winter 20°C to 40°C. In summer
hot dusty winds blows in the area with high velocity. The annual rainfall is about 300mm which is low and erratic. The ground water in
the area is very deep having depth 100m to 150m.
The soils of this area are deep to very deep coarse to medium textured and are moderately to well drained. This KHADIN
area soil type is loamy - sand. After water impounding in the KHADIN area soils are likely to be converted to sandy -loam type.
The catchment area is 156 ha.which can be clasified 156 ha. average – catchment. The area do not have any problem of
salinity / alknity.
The KHADIN work has been sanctioned in Jodhpur-XVII. An amount of Rs 5.14lacs as per enclosed abstract estimate is
required for this work. The estimates of KHADIN work are prepared on the basis of Gramin Kariya Nirdeshika 2010. The proposed
submergence area of the KHADIN is 8.1 Hact. The maximum height of the KHADIN bund as per design plan is 1.58 m.with storage
capacity of 2.71 X 10^4 Cum. The mandays to be generated are 7343 no.
1 Total catchment area 156 Hect.
2 Submergence area Hect.
3 Average Rainfall 12”
4 Rainfall intensity 5 cm / hr
5 Side slope U/s 2.5 : 1 D/s 1.5 : 1
6 Seepage line slope 5 :1
7 Expected runoff from the catchment area Q from strang table at 12” rainfall
where catchment is = mcft / Sqm
Q = (1.296 X 10000 X0.0393 X 156 ) / 2.589
= Cum
Lowest level of the filed boundry =
8 Capacity of the khadin upto F.T.L. it is calculated by following formula
A) V0 = H/3 (A0+A1+ v A0 X A1) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the lowest
= 0.29 / 3 ( 0.00 + 2.40 + 0.00 X 2.40 ) level of the boundry & First contour
= 0.23 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.29
A0= .Area of lower leevel of the boundry = 0.00 Hact
A1= Area of 1st contour = 2.40 Hact
B) V1 = H/3 (A1+A2+ v A1 X A2) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the First contour
= 0.25 / 3 ( 2.40 + 5.10 + 2.40 X 5.10 ) level & Second contour level
= 0.92 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.25
A1= .Area of the First contour = 2.40 Hact
A2= Area of the Second contour = 5.10 Hact
D E S I G N O F K H A D I N
8.22
1.296
30617
8.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
C) V2 = H/3 (A2+A3+ v A2 X A3) Where V2 = Capicity of the area covered by the Second contour
= 0.24 / 3 ( 5.10 + 8.00 + X 8.00 ) level & Third contour level
= 1.56 X10 4 H = Vertical hight (Difference between two contour)= 0.24
A2= = .Area of the Second contour = 5.10 Hact
A3= = Area of the Third contour = 8.0 Hact
Therefore V = V0+V1+V2
V = 0.23 + 0.92 + 1.56 )X 10 4
V = 2.71 X10 4
Crossection of the Khadin bund at maximum depth of submergence
Depth of the submergence = m Depth of flow over the crest = m
Free board = 1.5 X Hw in meter Where Hw = 0.014 (df)½
FB = 1.5 X Hw = 1.5X Depth of submergence
FB = % of slop of basin in meter
But proposed is 0.50 m df = ( / )X 100
= m
Total height of Khadin bund = m Hw = 0.014 ( ) ½
Hw =
Top width of bund = h /5 +1.5 or / 5 +1.5 = But proposed is m
Side slop U/S 2.5 :1 :1 Base width = ( X5 ) + 2.00 = m
Seepage line check –
Seepage line Width = Maximum impounding depth (up to F.T.L.)X (Seepage line slope + up stream side slop)
= X( 5.00 + 3.0 ) = 6.24
Base width > Seepage line width i.e. >
Hence design is safe
Length of pipe
The pipe (RCC) is placed at lowest level of the bund , length of pipe is required = 10.00 m
8.32 6.24
0.357
2.00
650.00
0.357
650.00
df =
1.58
1.58
8.32
0.78
1.82
1.58D/S 1.5
5.10
0.300.78
0.78 0.12
0.535
For the design of the crest lenth of the weste weir following formula is used
Q = 0.0276 C.I.A
Q = Peak rate of discharge
C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = 0.30
I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recuring interval
= 5 cm / hour
A= Catchment area = Hact.
Therefor Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A.
= 0.0276 X 0.30 X 5 X
=
Hence L = Q / (1.71 X h 3 /2 )
Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec
h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt.
L = Lenth of crest in meter
= / ( 1.71 X (0.30)3/2 )
= / 0.28
=
But Proposed is 30.00mt
W A S T E W E I R
6.44
23.01
6.44
156
156
6.44
1 Name of Village
2 Panchayat Samiti
3 District
4 Name of work
5 No of beneficiries
6 Submerged area (Hect.) 8.00 Hect.
7 Total capicity of W.H.S. 27075 Cum
8 Soil texture
9 Imperevious layer at depth
10 Average rainfall (mm)
11 Maximum rainfall (mm)
12 Flood lift
13 Cost of W.H.S.
14 Labour component
15 Material component
16 Per hect. Cost of W.H.S.
17 Employment Man days 7282
64250.00
Raikoriya
Baori
Jodhpur
Khadin
77100.00
S U M M A R Y 0 F KHADIN
436900.00
12”
5 cm/hr
0.30 m
514000.00
5
Sandy – Loam
10 m
S. No. ITEM Qty Rate Unit Amount
1 Layout of Bund ###### 0.25 M. 515.00
2 Clearance of Jungle ###### 1.40 Sq.M. 9120.16
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of
15 cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal
of excavated material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m
including dressing and compaction
###### 85.00 Cu.M. #######
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10.00 600.00 M. 6000.00
5 Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with
bajri and kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m
including dressing etc. complete.
32.83 92.00 Cu.M. 3020.54
6 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid
in position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50
mm, HB
8.21 ###### Cu.M. 14413.25
7 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
)For foundation
18.12 ###### Cu.M. 29313.31
8 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
) For superstructure
3.00 ###### Cu.M. 5320.27
9 Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4 19.40 212.00 Sq.M. 4111.74
10 Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3) 10.65 56.00 Sq.M. 596.26
11 Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm) 27.26 670.00 Cu.M. 18260.85
TOTA
L
#######
514000.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
ABSTRACT OF COST (KHADIN)
Say Rs.
KHADIN - II
S. No. ITEM
1 Layout of Bund X 2 = 2060.0 2060.0 M.
2 Clearance of Jungle X 6.51 = 6514.4 6514.4 Sq.M.
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,
breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of excavated 4978.40 Cu.M.
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10 M.
5 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 0.72
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.592
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 5.04
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.88
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 21.6
32.832 32.832 Cu.M.
6 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.18
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.648
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 1.26
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.72
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 5.4
8.208 8.208 Cu.M.
7 1 X 1.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.225
4 X 0.75 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.675
1 X 1.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.180
4 X 0.60 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.432
1 X 7.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 1.575
2 X 2.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.900
1 X 30.0 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 6.750
1 X 7.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 1.260
2 X 2.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.720
1 X 30.0 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 5.400
18.117 18.117 Cu.M.
Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri and
kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including dressing etc. complete.
10M.
4978.40
1030
1000
DETAILS OF WORK (KHADIN)
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
Measurement Qty.
KHADIN - II
Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in position
complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm, HB
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
S. No. ITEM Measurement Qty.
8 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 X 1.00 = 0.450
3 X 0.45 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.182
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.540
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 1 = 2.025
3.278
4 X 3.14 / 4.00 X 0.3^2 = 0.283
2.996 2.996 Cu.M.
9 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 = 0.450
1 X 0.60 X 0.45 = 0.270
1 X 30.0 X 0.45 = 13.500
1 X 7.50 X 0.45 = 3.375
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 = 1.800
19.395 19.395 Sq.M.
10 2 X( 1.00 $ 0.45 )X 1.00 = 2.900
3 X( 4.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.45 = 2.430
2 X( 0.60 $ 0.45 )X 0.60 = 1.260
2 X( 2.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.30 = 0.540
1 X 7.00 X 0.30 = 2.100
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 0.7 = 1.418
10.648 10.648 Sq.M.
11 1 X 30.0 X 2.00 X 0.23 = 13.80
1 X 10.0 X 1.80 X 0.23 = 4.14
1 X 15.0 X 2.70 X 0.23 = 9.32
27.26 27.26 Cu.M.
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4
Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3)
Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm)
Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work
level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum
0 9.70 9.80 0.10 2.10 2.5:1 1.5:1 0.40 0.02 0 0 0
40 9.70 0.10 2.50 0.23 0.13 40 5.00
80 9.62 0.18 2.82 0.44 0.34 40 13.46
120 9.40 0.40 3.70 1.16 0.80 40 32.06
160 8.96 0.84 5.46 3.18 2.17 40 86.70
200 8.70 1.10 6.50 4.73 3.95 40 158.10
240 8.64 1.16 6.74 5.13 4.93 40 197.14
280 8.60 1.20 6.90 5.40 5.26 40 210.54
320 8.62 1.18 6.82 5.26 5.33 40 213.26
360 8.60 1.20 6.90 5.40 5.33 40 213.26
400 8.55 1.25 7.10 5.75 5.58 40 223.00
440 8.62 1.18 6.82 5.26 5.51 40 220.26
480 8.64 1.16 6.74 5.13 5.20 40 207.80
520 8.65 1.15 6.70 5.06 5.09 40 203.74
560 8.55 1.25 7.10 5.75 5.41 40 216.20
600 8.45 1.35 7.50 6.48 6.12 40 244.60
640 8.30 1.50 8.10 7.65 7.07 40 282.60
680 8.22 1.58 8.42 8.31 7.98 40 319.22
720 8.25 1.55 8.30 8.06 8.19 40 327.42
760 8.30 1.50 8.10 7.65 7.86 40 314.20
800 8.42 1.38 7.62 6.71 7.18 40 287.14
840 8.49 1.31 7.34 6.18 6.45 40 257.80
880 8.61 1.19 6.86 5.33 5.76 40 230.29
920 8.68 1.12 6.58 4.86 5.10 40 203.84
960 8.84 0.96 5.94 3.86 4.36 40 174.40
1000 9.00 0.80 5.30 2.96 3.41 40 136.38
163.26 4978.40
Average base width = 6.51
KHADIN - II
Earth work chart
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Series1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000
Series2 9.70 9.70 9.62 9.40 8.96 8.70 8.64 8.60 8.62 8.60 8.55 8.62 8.64 8.65 8.55 8.45 8.30 8.22 8.25 8.30 8.42 8.49 8.61 8.68 8.84 9.00
Series3 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80
Series4 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30
Series5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
L-Section of Khadin
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 8.208 26.27 3.69 7.39 -
2 Copping in C.C. (1:2:4) 19.395 6.05 0.43 0.87 -
3 Massonary in Cement 21.113 22.59 6.33 - 23.22
Mortar ( 1:8 )
4 Pointing in Cement 10.648 0.30 0.03 - -
Mortar ( 1:3 )
5 Dry Stone Pitching 27.255 - - - 29.98
6 R.C.C. Cement Pipe 2 Nos.
TOTAL 55.21 10.49 8.26 53.20
Say Bags 55
Stone
CumITEMS.No.
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT
Quantity
Cum / Sqm
Cement
Begs
Sand
Cum
Aggrigate
Cum
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
G.L.
DRAWING OF PIPE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT OF KHADIN
0.45
0.45
0.6
1.0
0.45
EARTHEN STRUCTURE
G.L.
2.0M
0.15
G.L.
0.9
0.15
0.451.00 0.60
2.50
0.15
ELEVATION
PLAN
G.L.
0.30
0.075
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
2
U/S
DRAWING OF SIDE WASTE-WEIR FOR LOW COSTING KHADINS
2.0
M
0.6
5.2
SID
E V
IEW
2
D/S
2.0
M
0.8
30 M
SID
E V
IEW
PLAN
30.00
Name of Work :- Khadin - III
OBJECT :
The adventage of constructing such structure is:-
1. When rainfall is inadequate kharif can be taken
2. When rainfall is sufficient both kharif and rabi crop can be raised.
3. If the rainfall is in the latter end of the monsoon the water can be used for rabi
TECHNICAL REPORT
To conserve the moisture in the soil profile KHADIN’s are constructed as a bund across the slop on flater lands
so that runoff is spread over a larger cultivable area, this will improve soil fertility, check soil erosion. While selecting the
site preference is given to the fields owned by the weaker sections of the society.
The problem can be solved upto certain extent by constructing different structures for harvesting the runoff water
which will increase the production. Construction of different structure will reduce the siol erosion and conserve the
moisture in the soil. The rabi crop can be taken by conserving the moisture in the soil. KHADIN is one of the water
harvesting structure which will reduce the soil erosion , provide labour employment in the area and increases the
production by conserving the moisture in the soil profile.
In arid and semi arid region rainfall is erratic, scanty and insuffcient for crops. In this region frequent famine
conditions prevalls which causses mass migration of humen and cattle population in search of food, fodder and water
for servival.
GENERAL FEATURES :
SOIL DESCREPTION :
JUSTIFICATION :
CROPING PATTERN :
The crop can be taken in the submerged area kharif / rabi season depending on monsoon which is going to benefit the
cultivators.The major crops growing in the area are Bajra, Moong, Moth and Til etc. in kharif season. The present cropping pattern is
followed by cultivators as they have to depend upon rains. But the cropping pattern will be changed after harvesting the runoff water in
the KHADIN.
The KHADIN area is having gentle slop of 0.2% average with slop direction towards South–East to North – West. The cimate
of the area is hot and dry. The maximum temperature recorded in summer is 43°C to 47°C and in winter 20°C to 40°C. In summer
hot dusty winds blows in the area with high velocity. The annual rainfall is about 300mm which is low and erratic. The ground water in
the area is very deep having depth 100m to 150m.
The soils of this area are deep to very deep coarse to medium textured and are moderately to well drained. This KHADIN
area soil type is loamy - sand. After water impounding in the KHADIN area soils are likely to be converted to sandy -loam type.
The catchment area is 179 ha.which can be clasified 179 ha. average – catchment. The area do not have any problem of
salinity / alknity.
The KHADIN work has been sanctioned in Jodhpur-XVII. An amount of Rs 5.12lacs as per enclosed abstract estimate is
required for this work. The estimates of KHADIN work are prepared on the basis of Gramin Kariya Nirdeshika 2010. The proposed
submergence area of the KHADIN is 7.9 Hact. The maximum height of the KHADIN bund as per design plan is 1.68 m.with storage
capacity of 3.17 X 10^4 Cum. The mandays to be generated are 7315 no.
1 Total catchment area 179 Hect.
2 Submergence area Hect.
3 Average Rainfall 12”
4 Rainfall intensity 5 cm / hr
5 Side slope U/s 2.5 : 1 D/s 1.5 : 1
6 Seepage line slope 5 :1
7 Expected runoff from the catchment area Q from strang table at 12” rainfall
where catchment is = mcft / Sqm
Q = (1.296 X 10000 X0.0393 X 179 ) / 2.589
= Cum
Lowest level of the filed boundry =
8 Capacity of the khadin upto F.T.L. it is calculated by following formula
A) V0 = H/3 (A0+A1+ v A0 X A1) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the lowest
= 0.30 / 3 ( 0.00 + 2.10 + 0.00 X 2.10 ) level of the boundry & First contour
= 0.21 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.30
A0= .Area of lower leevel of the boundry = 0.00 Hact
A1= Area of 1st contour = 2.10 Hact
B) V1 = H/3 (A1+A2+ v A1 X A2) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the First contour
= 0.26 / 3 ( 2.10 + 4.90 + 2.10 X 4.90 ) level & Second contour level
= 0.88 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.26
A1= .Area of the First contour = 2.10 Hact
A2= Area of the Second contour = 4.90 Hact
D E S I G N O F K H A D I N
8.22
1.296
35223
8.20
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
C) V2 = H/3 (A2+A3+ v A2 X A3) Where V2 = Capicity of the area covered by the Second contour
= 0.32 / 3 ( 4.90 + 8.20 + X 8.20 ) level & Third contour level
= 2.07 X10 4 H = Vertical hight (Difference between two contour)= 0.32
A2= = .Area of the Second contour = 4.90 Hact
A3= = Area of the Third contour = 8.2 Hact
Therefore V = V0+V1+V2
V = 0.21 + 0.88 + 2.07 )X 10 4
V = 3.17 X10 4
Crossection of the Khadin bund at maximum depth of submergence
Depth of the submergence = m Depth of flow over the crest = m
Free board = 1.5 X Hw in meter Where Hw = 0.014 (df)½
FB = 1.5 X Hw = 1.5X Depth of submergence
FB = % of slop of basin in meter
But proposed is 0.50 m df = ( / )X 100
= m
Total height of Khadin bund = m Hw = 0.014 ( ) ½
Hw =
Top width of bund = h /5 +1.5 or / 5 +1.5 = But proposed is m
Side slop U/S 2.5 :1 :1 Base width = ( X5 ) + 2.00 = m
Seepage line check –
Seepage line Width = Maximum impounding depth (up to F.T.L.)X (Seepage line slope + up stream side slop)
= X( 5.00 + 3.0 ) = 7.04
Base width > Seepage line width i.e. >
Hence design is safe
Length of pipe
The pipe (RCC) is placed at lowest level of the bund , length of pipe is required = 10.00 m
4.90
0.300.88
0.88 0.12
0.569
8.72
0.88
1.84
1.68D/S 1.5
8.72 7.04
0.379
2.00
733.33
0.379
733.33
df =
1.68
1.68
Q = 0.0276 C.I.A
Q = Peak rate of discharge
C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = 0.30
I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recuring interval
= 5 cm / hour
A= Catchment area = Hact.
Therefor Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A.
= 0.0276 X 0.30 X 5 X
=
Hence L = Q / (1.71 X h 3 /2 )Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec
h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt.
L = Lenth of crest in meter
= / ( 1.71 X (0.30)3/2 )
= / 0.28
=
But Proposed is 30.00mt
W A S T E W E I R
7.41
26.47
7.41
179
179
7.41
1 Name of Village
3 District
4 Name of work
5 No of beneficiries
6 Submerged area (Hect.) 8.20 Hect.
7 Total capicity of W.H.S. 31681 Cum
8 Soil texture
9 Imperevious layer at depth
10 Average rainfall (mm)
11 Maximum rainfall (mm)
12 Flood lift
13 Cost of W.H.S.
14 Labour component
15 Material component
16 Per hect. Cost of W.H.S.
17 Employment Man days
S U M M A R Y 0 F KHADIN
435200.00
12”
5 cm/hr
0.30 m
512000.00
5
Sandy – Loam
10 m
7253
62439.02
Chandrakh
Jodhpur
Khadin
76800.00
S. No. ITEM Qty Rate Unit Amount
1 Layout of Bund ###### 0.25 M. 515.00
2 Clearance of Jungle ###### 1.40 Sq.M. 9093.28
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of
15 cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal
of excavated material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m
including dressing and compaction
###### 85.00 Cu.M. #######
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10.00 600.00 M. 6000.00
5 Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with
bajri and kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m
including dressing etc. complete.
32.83 92.00 Cu.M. 3020.54
6 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid
in position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50
mm, HB
8.21 ###### Cu.M. 14413.25
7 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
)For foundation
18.12 ###### Cu.M. 29313.31
8 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
) For superstructure
3.00 ###### Cu.M. 5320.27
9 Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4 19.40 212.00 Sq.M. 4111.74
10 Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3) 10.65 56.00 Sq.M. 596.26
11 Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm) 27.26 670.00 Cu.M. 18260.85
TOTA #######512000.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
ABSTRACT OF COST (KHADIN)
Say Rs.
S. No. ITEM
1 Layout of Bund X 2 = 2060.0 2060.0 M.
2 Clearance of Jungle X 6.50 = 6495.2 6495.2 Sq.M.
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15
cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of 4951.16 Cu.M.
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10 M.
5 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 0.72
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.592
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 5.04
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.88
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 21.6
32.832 32.832 Cu.M.
6 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.184 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.648
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 1.26
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.72
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 5.4
8.208 8.208 Cu.M.
7 1 X 1.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.2254 X 0.75 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.675
1 X 1.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.180
4 X 0.60 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.432
1 X 7.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 1.575
2 X 2.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.900
1 X 30.0 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 6.750
1 X 7.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 1.260
2 X 2.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.720
1 X 30.0 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 5.400
18.117 18.117 Cu.M.
8 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 X 1.00 = 0.450
Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in
position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm, HB
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri and
kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated material
within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including dressing etc.
complete.
10M.
4951.16
1030
1000
DETAILS OF WORK (KHADIN)
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-BaoriMeasurement Qty.
S. No. ITEM Measurement Qty.
3 X 0.45 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.182
1 X 0.45 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.081
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.540
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 1 = 2.025
3.278
4 X 3.14 / 4.00 X 0.3^2 = 0.283
2.996 2.996 Cu.M.
9 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 = 0.450
1 X 0.60 X 0.45 = 0.270
1 X 30.0 X 0.45 = 13.500
1 X 7.50 X 0.45 = 3.375
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 = 1.800
19.395 19.395 Sq.M.
10 2 X( 1.00 $ 0.45 )X 1.00 = 2.900
3 X( 4.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.45 = 2.430
2 X( 0.60 $ 0.45 )X 0.60 = 1.260
2 X( 2.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.30 = 0.540
1 X 7.00 X 0.30 = 2.100
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 0.7 = 1.418
10.648 10.648 Sq.M.
11 1 X 30.0 X 2.00 X 0.23 = 13.80
1 X 10.0 X 1.80 X 0.23 = 4.14
1 X 15.0 X 2.70 X 0.23 = 9.32
27.26 27.26 Cu.M.
superstructure
Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4
Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3)
Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm)
Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work
level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum
0 9.65 9.80 0.15 2.10 2.5:1 1.5:1 0.60 0.05 0 0 0
40 9.62 0.18 2.82 0.44 0.24 40 9.76
80 9.58 0.22 2.98 0.56 0.50 40 20.03
120 9.40 0.40 3.70 1.16 0.86 40 34.38
160 8.96 0.84 5.46 3.18 2.17 40 86.70
200 8.70 1.10 6.50 4.73 3.95 40 158.10
240 8.55 1.25 7.10 5.75 5.24 40 209.60
280 8.60 1.20 6.90 5.40 5.58 40 223.00
320 8.62 1.18 6.82 5.26 5.33 40 213.26
360 8.60 1.20 6.90 5.40 5.33 40 213.26
400 8.55 1.25 7.10 5.75 5.58 40 223.00
440 8.62 1.18 6.82 5.26 5.51 40 220.26
480 8.64 1.16 6.74 5.13 5.20 40 207.80
520 8.65 1.15 6.70 5.06 5.09 40 203.74
560 8.55 1.25 7.10 5.75 5.41 40 216.20
600 8.45 1.35 7.50 6.48 6.12 40 244.60
640 8.30 1.50 8.10 7.65 7.07 40 282.60
680 8.22 1.58 8.42 8.31 7.98 40 319.22
720 8.25 1.55 8.30 8.06 8.19 40 327.42
760 8.30 1.50 8.10 7.65 7.86 40 314.20
800 8.42 1.38 7.62 6.71 7.18 40 287.14
840 8.49 1.31 7.34 6.18 6.45 40 257.80
880 8.61 1.19 6.86 5.33 5.76 40 230.29
920 8.80 1.00 6.10 4.10 4.72 40 188.62
960 8.95 0.85 5.50 3.23 3.67 40 146.60
1000 9.10 0.70 4.90 2.45 2.84 40 113.60
162.98 4951.16
Average base width = 6.50
KHADIN - III
Earth work chart
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Series1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000
Series2 9.65 9.62 9.58 9.40 8.96 8.70 8.55 8.60 8.62 8.60 8.55 8.62 8.64 8.65 8.55 8.45 8.30 8.22 8.25 8.30 8.42 8.49 8.61 8.80 8.95 9.10
Series3 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80
Series4 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30
Series5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
L-Section of Khadin
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 8.208 26.27 3.69 7.39 -
2 Copping in C.C. (1:2:4) 19.395 6.05 0.43 0.87 -
3 Massonary in Cement 21.113 22.59 6.33 - 23.22
Mortar ( 1:8 )
4 Pointing in Cement 10.648 0.30 0.03 - -
Mortar ( 1:3 )
5 Dry Stone Pitching 27.255 - - - 29.98
6 R.C.C. Cement Pipe 2 Nos.
TOTAL 55.21 10.49 8.26 53.20
Say Bags 55
Stone
CumITEMS.No.
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT
Quantity
Cum / Sqm
Cement
Begs
Sand
Cum
Aggrigate
Cum
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
2.0M
0.45
EARTHEN STRUCTURE
G.L.
DRAWING OF PIPE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT OF KHADIN
0.45
0.45
0.6
1.0
G.L.
0.30
0.075
ELEVATION
PLAN
G.L.
0.451.00 0.60
2.50
0.15
0.15
G.L.
0.9
0.15
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
2
U/S
DRAWING OF SIDE WASTE-WEIR FOR LOW COSTING KHADINS
2.0
M
0.6
5.2
SID
E V
IEW
2
D/S
PLAN
30.00
2.0
M
0.8
30 M
SID
E V
IEW
Name of Work :- Khadin - IV
INTRODUCTION :
OBJECT :
The adventage of constructing such structure is:-
1. When rainfall is inadequate kharif can be taken
2. When rainfall is sufficient both kharif and rabi crop can be raised.
3. If the rainfall is in the latter end of the monsoon the water can be used for rabi
TECHNICAL REPORT
To conserve the moisture in the soil profile KHADIN’s are constructed as a bund across the slop on flater lands
so that runoff is spread over a larger cultivable area, this will improve soil fertility, check soil erosion. While selecting the
site preference is given to the fields owned by the weaker sections of the society.
The problem can be solved upto certain extent by constructing different structures for harvesting the runoff water
which will increase the production. Construction of different structure will reduce the siol erosion and conserve the
moisture in the soil. The rabi crop can be taken by conserving the moisture in the soil. KHADIN is one of the water
harvesting structure which will reduce the soil erosion , provide labour employment in the area and increases the
production by conserving the moisture in the soil profile.
In arid and semi arid region rainfall is erratic, scanty and insuffcient for crops. In this region frequent famine
conditions prevalls which causses mass migration of humen and cattle population in search of food, fodder and water
for servival.
GENERAL FEATURES :
SOIL DESCREPTION :
JUSTIFICATION :
CROPING PATTERN :
The crop can be taken in the submerged area kharif / rabi season depending on monsoon which is going to benefit the
cultivators.The major crops growing in the area are Bajra, Moong, Moth and Til etc. in kharif season. The present cropping
pattern is followed by cultivators as they have to depend upon rains. But the cropping pattern will be changed after harvesting
the runoff water in the KHADIN.
The KHADIN area is having gentle slop of 0.2% average with slop direction towards South–East to North – West. The
cimate of the area is hot and dry. The maximum temperature recorded in summer is 43°C to 47°C and in winter 20°C to 40°C.
In summer hot dusty winds blows in the area with high velocity. The annual rainfall is about 300mm which is low and erratic.
The ground water in the area is very deep having depth 100m to 150m.
The soils of this area are deep to very deep coarse to medium textured and are moderately to well drained. This
KHADIN area soil type is loamy - sand. After water impounding in the KHADIN area soils are likely to be converted to sandy -
loam type.
The catchment area is 215 ha.which can be clasified 215 ha. average – catchment. The area do not have any problem
of salinity / alknity.
The KHADIN work has been sanctioned in Jodhpur-XVII. An amount of Rs 5.24lacs as per enclosed abstract estimate
is required for this work. The estimates of KHADIN work are prepared on the basis of Gramin Kariya Nirdeshika 2010. The
proposed submergence area of the KHADIN is 8.3 Hact. The maximum height of the KHADIN bund as per design plan is
1.78 m.with storage capacity of 3.87 X 10 4̂ Cum. The mandays to be generated are 7486 no.
1 Total catchment area 215 Hect.
2 Submergence area Hect.
3 Average Rainfall 12”
4 Rainfall intensity 5 cm / hr
5 Side slope U/s 2.5 : 1 D/s 1.5 : 1
6 Seepage line slope 5 :1
7 Expected runoff from the catchment area Q from strang table at 12” rainfall
where catchment is = mcft / Sqm
Q = (1.296 X 10000 X0.0393 X 215 ) / 2.589
= Cum
Lowest level of the filed boundry =
8 Capacity of the khadin upto F.T.L. it is calculated by following formula
A) V0 = H/3 (A0+A1+ v A0 X A1) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the lowest
= 0.30 / 3 ( 0.00 + 2.20 + 0.00 X 2.20 ) level of the boundry & First contour
= 0.22 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.30
A0= .Area of lower leevel of the boundry = 0.00 Hact
A1= Area of 1st contour = 2.20 Hact
B) V1 = H/3 (A1+A2+ v A1 X A2) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the First contour
= 0.29 / 3 ( 2.20 + 5.25 + 2.20 X 5.25 ) level & Second contour level
= 1.05 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.29
A1= .Area of the First contour = 2.20 Hact
A2= Area of the Second contour = 5.25 Hact
D E S I G N O F K H A D I N
8.22
1.296
42243
8.20
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
KHADIN - IV
C) V2 = H/3 (A2+A3+ v A2 X A3) Where V2 = Capicity of the area covered by the Second contour
= 0.39 / 3 ( 5.25 + 8.20 + X 8.20 ) level & Third contour level
= 2.60 X10 4 H = Vertical hight (Difference between two contour)= 0.39
A2= = .Area of the Second contour = 5.25 Hact
A3= = Area of the Third contour = 8.2 Hact
Therefore V = V0+V1+V2
V = 0.22 + 1.05 + 2.60 )X 10 4
V = 3.87 X10 4
Crossection of the Khadin bund at maximum depth of submergence
Depth of the submergence = m Depth of flow over the crest = m
Free board = 1.5 X Hw in meter Where Hw = 0.014 (df)½
FB = 1.5 X Hw = 1.5X Depth of submergence
FB = % of slop of basin in meter
But proposed is 0.50 m df = ( / )X 100
= m
Total height of Khadin bund = m Hw = 0.014 ( ) ½
Hw =
Top width of bund = h /5 +1.5 or / 5 +1.5 = But proposed is m
Side slop U/S 2.5 :1 :1 Base width = ( X5 ) + 2.00 = m
Seepage line check –
Seepage line Width = Maximum impounding depth (up to F.T.L.)X (Seepage line slope + up stream side slop)
= X( 5.00 + 3.0 ) = 7.84
Base width > Seepage line width i.e. >
Hence design is safe
Length of pipe
The pipe (RCC) is placed at lowest level of the bund , length of pipe is required = 10.00 m
9.12 7.84
0.400
2.00
816.67
0.400
816.67
df =
1.78
1.78
9.12
0.98
1.86
1.78D/S 1.5
5.25
0.300.98
0.98 0.12
0.600
For the design of the crest lenth of the weste weir following formula is used
Q = 0.0276 C.I.A
Q = Peak rate of discharge
C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = 0.30
I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recuring interval
= 5 cm / hour
A= Catchment area = Hact.
Therefor Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A.
= 0.0276 X 0.30 X 5 X
=
Hence L = Q / (1.71 X h 3 /2 )
Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec
h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt.
L = Lenth of crest in meter
= / ( 1.71 X (0.30)3/2 )
= / 0.28
=
But Proposed is 30.00mt
W A S T E W E I R
8.89
31.75
8.89
215
215
8.89
1 Name of Village
2 Panchayat Samiti
3 District
4 Name of work
5 No of beneficiries
6 Submerged area (Hect.) 8.20 Hect.
7 Total capicity of W.H.S. 38702 Cum
8 Soil texture
9 Imperevious layer at depth
10 Average rainfall (mm)
11 Maximum rainfall (mm)
12 Flood lift
13 Cost of W.H.S.
14 Labour component
15 Material component
16 Per hect. Cost of W.H.S.
17 Employment Man days 7423
63902.44
Chandrakh
Baori
Jodhpur
Khadin
78600.00
S U M M A R Y 0 F KHADIN
445400.00
12”
5 cm/hr
0.30 m
524000.00
6
Sandy – Loam
10 m
S. No. ITEM Qty Rate Unit Amount
1 Layout of Bund ###### 0.25 M. 555.00
2 Clearance of Jungle ###### 1.40 Sq.M. 9528.96
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of
15 cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal
of excavated material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m
including dressing and compaction
###### 85.00 Cu.M. #######
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10.00 600.00 M. 6000.00
5 Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with
bajri and kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m
including dressing etc. complete.
32.83 92.00 Cu.M. 3020.54
6 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid
in position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50
mm, HB
8.21 ###### Cu.M. 14413.25
7 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
)For foundation
18.12 ###### Cu.M. 29313.31
8 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6
) For superstructure
3.00 ###### Cu.M. 5320.27
9 Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4 19.40 212.00 Sq.M. 4111.74
10 Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3) 10.65 56.00 Sq.M. 596.26
11 Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm) 27.26 670.00 Cu.M. 18260.85
TOTA
L
#######
524000.00
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
ABSTRACT OF COST (KHADIN)
Say Rs.
KHADIN - IV
S. No. ITEM
1 Layout of Bund X 2 = 2220.0 2220.0 M.
2 Clearance of Jungle X 6.30 = 6806.4 6806.4 Sq.M.
3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15
cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of 5084.86 Cu.M.
4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10 M.
5 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 0.72
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.592
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 5.04
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.88
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 21.6
32.832 32.832 Cu.M.
6 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.18
4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.648
1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 1.26
2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.72
1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 5.4
8.208 8.208 Cu.M.
7 1 X 1.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.225
4 X 0.75 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.675
1 X 1.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.180
4 X 0.60 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.432
1 X 7.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 1.575
2 X 2.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.900
1 X 30.0 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 6.750
1 X 7.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 1.260
2 X 2.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.720
1 X 30.0 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 5.400
Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri and
kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated material
within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including dressing etc.
complete.
10M.
5084.86
1110
1080
DETAILS OF WORK (KHADIN)
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
Measurement Qty.
KHADIN - IV
Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in
position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm, HB
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For
foundation
S. No. ITEM Measurement Qty.
18.117 18.117 Cu.M.
8 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 X 1.00 = 0.450
3 X 0.45 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.182
1 X 0.45 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.081
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.540
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 1 = 2.025
3.278
4 X 3.14 / 4.00 X 0.3^2 = 0.283
2.996 2.996 Cu.M.
9 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 = 0.450
1 X 0.60 X 0.45 = 0.270
1 X 30.0 X 0.45 = 13.500
1 X 7.50 X 0.45 = 3.375
2 X 2.00 X 0.45 = 1.800
19.395 19.395 Sq.M.
10 2 X( 1.00 $ 0.45 )X 1.00 = 2.900
3 X( 4.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.45 = 2.430
2 X( 0.60 $ 0.45 )X 0.60 = 1.260
2 X( 2.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.30 = 0.540
1 X 7.00 X 0.30 = 2.100
(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 0.7 = 1.418
10.648 10.648 Sq.M.
11 1 X 30.0 X 2.00 X 0.23 = 13.80
1 X 10.0 X 1.80 X 0.23 = 4.14
1 X 15.0 X 2.70 X 0.23 = 9.32
27.26 27.26 Cu.M.
Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For
superstructure
Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4
Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3)
Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm)
Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work
level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum
0 9.60 9.80 0.20 2.00 2.5:1 1.5:1 0.80 0.08 0 0 0
40 9.62 0.18 2.72 0.42 0.25 40 10.10
80 9.58 0.22 2.88 0.54 0.48 40 19.23
120 9.40 0.40 3.60 1.12 0.83 40 33.14
160 8.96 0.84 5.36 3.09 2.11 40 84.22
200 8.70 1.10 6.40 4.62 3.86 40 154.22
240 8.55 1.25 7.00 5.63 5.12 40 204.90
280 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.45 40 218.10
320 8.62 1.18 6.72 5.14 5.21 40 208.50
360 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.21 40 208.50
400 8.55 1.25 7.00 5.63 5.45 40 218.10
440 8.62 1.18 6.72 5.14 5.38 40 215.40
480 8.64 1.16 6.64 5.01 5.08 40 203.12
520 8.70 1.10 6.40 4.62 4.82 40 192.62
560 8.69 1.11 6.44 4.68 4.65 40 186.08
600 8.70 1.10 6.40 4.62 4.65 40 186.08
640 8.55 1.25 7.00 5.63 5.12 40 204.90
680 8.45 1.35 7.40 6.35 5.99 40 239.40
720 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 6.92 40 276.90
760 8.22 1.58 8.32 8.15 7.83 40 313.06
800 8.25 1.55 8.20 7.91 8.03 40 321.16
840 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 7.70 40 308.10
880 8.42 1.38 7.52 6.57 7.03 40 281.38
920 8.49 1.31 7.24 6.05 6.31 40 252.42
960 8.70 1.10 6.40 4.62 5.34 40 213.44
1000 9.00 0.80 5.20 2.88 3.75 40 150.00
1040 9.15 0.65 4.60 2.15 2.51 40 100.50
1080 9.20 0.60 4.40 1.92 2.03 40 81.30
170.96 5084.86
Average base width = 6.30
KHADIN - IV
Earth work chart
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Series1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080
Series2 9.60 9.62 9.58 9.40 8.96 8.70 8.55 8.60 8.62 8.60 8.55 8.62 8.64 8.70 8.69 8.70 8.55 8.45 8.30 8.22 8.25 8.30 8.42 8.49 8.70 9.00 9.15 9.20
Series3 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.80
Series4 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30 9.30
Series5 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
L-Section of Khadin
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 8.208 26.27 3.69 7.39 -
2 Copping in C.C. (1:2:4) 19.395 6.05 0.43 0.87 -
3 Massonary in Cement 21.113 22.59 6.33 - 23.22
Mortar ( 1:8 )
4 Pointing in Cement 10.648 0.30 0.03 - -
Mortar ( 1:3 )
5 Dry Stone Pitching 27.255 - - - 29.98
6 R.C.C. Cement Pipe 2 Nos.
TOTAL 55.21 10.49 8.26 53.20
Say Bags 55
Stone
CumITEMS.No.
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT
Quantity
Cum / Sqm
Cement
Begs
Sand
Cum
Aggrigate
Cum
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
G.L.
DRAWING OF PIPE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT OF KHADIN
0.45
0.45
0.6
1.0
0.45
EARTHEN STRUCTURE
G.L.
2.0M
0.15
G.L.
0.9
0.15
0.451.00 0.60
2.50
0.15
ELEVATION
PLAN
G.L.
0.30
0.075
Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XVII Panchayat Samiti :-Baori
2
U/S
SID
E V
IEW
DRAWING OF SIDE WASTE-WEIR FOR LOW COSTING KHADINS
2.0
M
0.6
5.2
2
D/S
30 M
SID
E V
IEW
PLAN
30.00
2.0
M
0.8
Bund
50
Outer Length 50 mtr
Inner Length 45.2 mtr
Outer Width 21 mtr
Inner Width 16.2 mtr 21 16.2
Depth 1.2 mtr
Upper Area 1050
Lower Area 732.24
Estimate of Dug out Pond
Lower Area 732.24
45.2
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Upper
Area
Lower
Area
Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Layout for Pond 2 132.4 1 1 264.80 Cu.m. 0.70 185.36
2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist and
disposal of excavated material within
initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m
2.1 In hard soil 119(b) 1 1050 732.24 1.2 1069.34 Cu.m. 85.00 90894.24
3 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick
including supply of stones
124
1 50 1 0.2 10.00 Cu.m. 670.00 6700.00
97779.60
Add 3% contingency 2933.4
Total 100713.0
Say 100000.0
DESIGN OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
280001500009
140003 2
185001700015500
20000370003400031000
654
1222
Length of
Head wall
No of Lscd Per Unit Cost Total Cost
7 20000
Head Wall Length = 7 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 7 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 7 1.6 0.3 3.4 92.0 309.1
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 7 1.6 0.3 3.4
1 7 1.3 0.3 2.7
1 7 1.0 0.3 2.1
1 7 0.7 0.3 1.5
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
18.3 1040.0 19032.0
19473.6
Add 3% Contingency 584.2
Total 20057.8
Say 20000
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 6 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 6 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9 92.0 265.0
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9
1 6.0 1.3 0.3 2.3
1 6.0 1.0 0.3 1.8
1 6.0 0.7 0.3 1.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
16.9 1040.0 17596.8
17994.2
Add 3% Contingency 539.8
Total 18534.1
Say 18500
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 5 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 5 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4 92.0 220.8
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4
1 5.0 1.3 0.3 2.0
1 5.0 1.0 0.3 1.5
1 5.0 0.7 0.3 1.1
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
15.5 1040.0 16161.6
16514.9
Add 3% Contingency 495.4
Total 17010.3
Say 17000
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 4 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 4 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9 92.0 176.6
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9
1 4.0 1.3 0.3 1.6
1 4.0 1.0 0.3 1.2
1 4.0 0.7 0.3 0.8
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
14.2 1040.0 14726.4
15035.5
Add 3% Contingency 451.1
Total 15486.6
Say 15500
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
Head Wall Length = 3 m
Plan Elevation
1.5 3 1.5
0.7
0.3 0.3
0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8
GL 0.3 0.3
0.3
Pit
1.6
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount
ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)
0.6
Earth work Excavation in hard
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
1
2B 1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5
1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4
1 3.0 1.3 0.3 1.2
1 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.9
1 3.0 0.7 0.3 0.6
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3
12.8 1040.0 13291.2
13556.2
Add 3% Contingency 406.7
Total 13962.8
Say 14000
2 Dry stone masonry
21B
soil up to 1.5 mt Height and
deposited excavated material lead
op to 150
S. no. Name of work Item no. No X Sec Length Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Excavation of earth in hard soil dry or
moist and disposal of excavated material
within initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m,
laying in layers of 15 cm dressing and
compaction etc. complete
1.1 In Hard soil 119(b)
1 4.84 18 1 87.08 Cu.m. 85.00 7401.38
2 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick including
supply of stones
124
1 1 18 0.2 3.60 Cu.m. 670.00 2412.00
9813.38
Add 3% contingency 294.4
Total 10107.8
Say 10000.0
MODEL ESTIMATE OF NALLAH BUNDING
CROSS-SECTION OF NALLAH BUNDING
Top width =Based on seepage line check
Slope of seepage line 4:1
0.6 Stone Pitching
2 :1
1.5 :1 US
DS 1.5
0.90.9
2.25 3
0.45 3.6 1.8 0.45
5.85
10.75 m
CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht
2
CS = 4.8375 Sq.m.
Average Cross section 4.84 Sq.m.
V-Ditches Area = 10 ha.
DCB Fencing
Name of work Conservation
Measure
Production
Measure
Total Cost
V. Ditch 178600 23000 201600.00
Plantation 0 494600 494600.00
Fencing DCB 0 268100 268100.00
Total 178600 785700 964300.00
Say 9.64 Lakh
Silvi Pasture Development
Abstract of Cost
Estimate for V.Ditch in Pasture
Area Length Width Interval No of row Length
Ha mtr mtr mtr mtr
10 1000 100 6 167 16667
Dhaman require on V-ditch =0.002 kg/m 33 Kg
Spacing 5 mtr
Dhaman require between v-ditches =10 kg/ha 100 Kg
0.6
0.3
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Jungal clearance 107 1 500 50 1 25000 Sqm 1.4 35000
2 Excavation in hard soil or earth
mixed with bajri and kankar ormixed with bajri and kankar or
boulder dry or moist & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead
of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including
dressing etc. complete. 2(B) 0.5 16667 0.60 0.3 1500.00 Cum 92 138000.0
Kg
3 Making of balls of grass
seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass seed :1 FYM : 2
sand : 2 clay 3/1/9 forest 133 133.00
Per 6 kg
material 17 376.8
4 Sowing of balls of grass seed by
dibbling method at 30 cm spacing 3/2/9 forest 133 133
Per 6 kg
material 109 2416.2
5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 133 Kg 150 19950
195743.0Add 3% contingency 5872.3
Conservation Measure 178600.0 Total 201615.3
Production Measure 23000.0 Say 201600.0
Plant to pant Spacing 4 m 24 Sqm No of plant 4166.67
Row to row Spacing 6 m Gap filling 20% 833.3333
Available Area 10 Ha Total no of Plants 5000
Item no
Year No./Year
1 Digging of pit( kankar boulder soil) 112 ('C) 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 67000
2Cost of Plant As per
forest 1 No. 5 5.00 25000
3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 3.6 3.60 18000
4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 1 No. 2.4 4.80 24000
5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 18000
6Insecticide treatment Market
rate3
0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 305 2.75 13725
7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 135000
8 Transportation of water 5 Km 108 3 5 225 /1000Ltr 37.4 8.42 42075
9 Watch & ward Minimum
wages3
12 34 Month 3240 22 110160
10
Transportation of plants from
nursery to planting site
LS
1
1 1 1 1.00 5000
11 Pruning of plants forest bsr 1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 4450
12
Protection of plants from frost / loo
using grass or other locally available
material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m
dia. Of plant height and covering the
1 1
1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 17800
TOTAL 480210
Contingency 3% 14406
Grand total 494616
Say 494600.0
AmountUnit
Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land
QtyDescription
Total
S.No Length Width Height (Amount for
10 ha.)
Rate
0.9 m
Area 10 Ha
Length 1580 mtr
1.2 m
1.5 m 0.3
1.5 m
1.2 m
Estimate of Ditch Cum Bund Fencing
0.9 m
S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount
1 Layout for DCB 2 1580 1 1 3160.00 Cu.m. 0.70 2212.00
2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist
and disposal of excavated material
within initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5
m
2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 92.00 104659.20
2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 134.00 152438.40
3 Sowing of seed on ridge 114 1 790 1 1 790.00 Rm 0.60 474.00
Cost of seeds LS 5.00 Kg 50.00 250.00
260033.60
Add 3% contingency 7801.0
Total 268084.6
Say 268100.0
S. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)
1 Wooden Ballies (3 m long) 20 No. 70 1400
2 Wooden Ballies (4 m long) 25 No. 80 2000
3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 Sq. m. 40 5000
4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies and mats 20 Kg 45 900
5 Labour charges for erection of shades 15 No. 135 2025
6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets LS 2000
7 Weighing scale (100 Kg capacity) 1 No. 2500 2500
8 Cow dung 10 Ton 1100 11000
9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 Kg 100 3000
10 Formation of vermi-bed with agro-waste, cow-
dung and worms
20 bed 300 6000
11 Miscellaneous 175
Total Cost 36000
No. of Units 7
Cost for 7 Units 252000
Category No. of Units Contributio
n
Cost from
project
Cost from project
(per unit)
Gen, OBC 5 72000 108000
SC ST 2 14400 57600
Total 7 86400 165600 23657.14286
MODEL ESTIMATE FOR A VERMI-COMPOST UNIT
Returns from Vermi-compost units
Benefits
1 Sale of vermi-compost 70 Ton 4000 280000
2 Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton 350 Kg 50 17500
Total 297500
Net benefit 297500 - 252000 45500
Jodhpur XVII
CHAPTER - 8
PPPPPPPPRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT
OOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS
Jodhpur XVII
1. Project Outcome :
By the end of the project, in the project area, it is expected that the water level in the tube-wells increases
considerably and sufficient water for man and productivity should be increased after the completion of the project.
Few parameters which are expected to be increased after the completion of completion as the project are as follow :
S. No. Parameters Before Execution of
Project
Expected Increase after the
Completion of the Project
1 Availability of water
a. Average Water Table in the
Wells
650 ft 300-350 ft.
b. Available Water in the Wells/Tube Wells Wells/Tube Wells/Ponds
2. Agriculture/ Horticulture
a. Total Sowing Area
b. (Net) Sown Area (ha)
c. Production of Major Crops:
• Gowar
• Bajara
• Moth
9-12 quintal/ ha.
10-12 quintal/ ha.
9-12 quintal/ ha.
11-18 quintal/ ha.
12-18 quintal/ ha.
12-20 quintal/ ha.
Jodhpur XVII
d. Production of Raida 600-700 quintal
800-1000 quintal
e. Average Production of
Horticulture Plants
50-100 quintal
350-500 quintal
(Different types of fruits plants
Mango, Guava, Ber, Papaya, etc)
3. Live Stock
a. Milk Production 3-7 kg/ animal 7-12 kg/ animal
b. Animal Diseases By regular camps, the various diseases will be reduced
4. Livelihood
a. Average income of family by
introduction of other micro
enterprises
Rs.2500-3000
per month
Rs.4000-5000
per month
b. SHG Groups 10 60 The various homogenous groups
will be constituted and the training of
different activities will be given,
especially for land less families.
Jodhpur XVII
During the project period (5-7 years), the various activities will be done. The natural resource management
activities will be done in between the project phase. The proposed NRM works in arable, non arable land and
drainage line treatment will increase the water table, production of agriculture/horticulture crops. Similarly the
livestock will increase the milk production. the year wise various outcomes of the project are as follows :
S.
No.
Activity Unit Before
Project
During the Project Period
I Yr II Yr III Yr IV Yr V Yr VI Yr VII Yr
1. Engineering Structure
a.
Contour Bund, CVH,
Restoration of Old
structures, Gully
Control Structure
Hect. Nil 1000 2000 700
b. Earth Bunds, WHS,
Anicut
No. Nil
2. Increase of Agriculture Production due to construction of above Engineering Structure
a. Rabi Season (Main
Crops)
• Wheat
• Mustard
Qtl/ ha 29
12
29
12
29
12
35
14
37
15
39
16
40
18
40-50
18-20
Jodhpur XVII
b. Kharif Season (Main
Crops)
• Bajra
• Guar
Qtl/ ha 12.5
5.50
12.5
5.5
12.5
5.5
14
6.0
15
8
18
9
20
10
20-25
10-12
3. Increase of Area of Agriculture Production of Engineering Structure
a. Rain fed Area Ha. 1350 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
b. Irrigated Area Ha. 385 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
c. Vegetable Area Ha. 20 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%
d. Pasture Development Ha. Nil 10 20
4. Water Table Depth
• May m. 190 160 150 140 130 120
• September m. 170 155 145 135 125 115
• December
m. 180 158 148 138 128 118
5. Availability of
Drinking Water
Dec. Dec. Dec. Dec. Jan. Jan. March May
6. Survival of Plants
• Horticulture
Plants
Nos. 20 30 500 2500 5000 8000 10000 10000
Jodhpur XVII
• Forestry Plants Nos. 100 50 450 1000 2500 4000 6000 8000
7. Milk Production per animal
• Cow Kg. 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 6 7 7
• Buffalo Kg. 7.5 7.5 7.5 8 8 8 9 9
• Goat Kg. 2.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3 3 3
8. Control on Migration No. Nil 10% 30% 40% 70% 80%
Critical Assumption
No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters
Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.
There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is
done.
Adverse market conditions do not persist long.
Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the
rural areas.
Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate
technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.
Jodhpur XVII
The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from
participants.
The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District and State level
Implementing Agencies
Means of Verification of indicators
Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end of
the project period
Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.
Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.
Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual beneficiaries/project-
related village and local bodies/PRIs.
External review missions
Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry
Project outcomes
Watershed - Jodhpur XVII
(a) Natural resource management
1 Erosion
At beginning After treatment At beginningAfter treatment At beginningAfter treatment
Area ha 1114 512 Area ha 32 22 Area ha 17 6
Sheet erosion Rill erosion Gully erosion
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
At beginning After treatment
Sheet erosion
Area ha
Area ha
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
At beginning After treatment
Rill erosion
Area ha
Area ha
02468
1012141618
At beginning After treatment
Gully erosion
Area ha
Area ha
Project outcomes
(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XVII
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginnin
After
treatment
At
beginnin
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
kg/ha 1800 2100 350 520 400 560 400 600 180 300
Moth sesamumBajara Goar Mung
2000
2500
kg/ha
Bajara At beginning
Bajara After treatment
0
500
1000
1500
2000
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
Goar At beginning
Goar After treatment
Mung At beginning
Mung After treatment
Moth At beginning
Moth After treatment
sesamum At beginning
sesamum After treatment
Project outcomes
(b) Productivity Watershed - Jodhpur XVII
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
At
beginning
After
treatment
kg/ha 1900 2800 24000 28000 1200 1500 165 205
Wheat CuminOnion Mustard
25000
30000
kg/ha
Wheat At beginning
Wheat After treatment
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
At beg
innin
g
Aft
er
treatm
ent
Wheat After treatment
Onion At beginning
Onion After treatment
Mustard At beginning
Mustard After treatment
Cumin At beginning
Cumin After treatment
Project outcomes
(C) Milk Production (C) Average Income Per FamilyWatershed - Jodhpur XVII
At beginning After treatment At beginning After treatment
Ltr./ Year 13200 15600 Rs./ Month 2400 5000
IncomeMilk
Ltr./ Year
5000
Rs./ Month
12000
12500
13000
13500
14000
14500
15000
15500
16000
At beginning After treatment
Ltr./ Year
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
At beginning After treatment
Income
Rs./ Month
Jodhpur XVII
CHAPTER - 9
AAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEXXXXXXXXUUUUUUUURRRRRRRREEEEEEEE
