125
Henry Segerman Oklahoma State University Design of 3D printed mathematical art

Design of 3d printed math art

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Design of 3d printed math art

Henry SegermanOklahoma State University

Design of 3D printed mathematical art

Page 2: Design of 3d printed math art

3D printing technologiesFused deposition modelling

Image credit: Wikipedia - Zureks

Page 3: Design of 3d printed math art

3D printing technologiesStereolithography

Image credit: Wikipedia - Materialgeeza

Page 4: Design of 3d printed math art

3D printing technologies

Selective laser melting

Image credit: Wikipedia - Materialgeeza

Page 5: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 6: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 7: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 8: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 9: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 10: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 11: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 12: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 13: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 14: Design of 3d printed math art

Turning mathematics into sculpture: thickening

Page 15: Design of 3d printed math art

Quadric surfaces

Page 16: Design of 3d printed math art

Quadric surfaces

Page 17: Design of 3d printed math art

So far, we have looked at “algebraic” objects, where the geometry isprecisely defined, and the only question is in thickening.

For topological objects, such as the knot, we also have to choosethe geometry...

(or not, if we print a flexible design!)

Page 18: Design of 3d printed math art

So far, we have looked at “algebraic” objects, where the geometry isprecisely defined, and the only question is in thickening.

For topological objects, such as the knot, we also have to choosethe geometry... (or not, if we print a flexible design!)

Page 19: Design of 3d printed math art

Strategies for choosing geometry

1. Manual - using whatever design software is available to buildthe object by hand.

2. Parametric/implicit - generating the desired geometry using aparametrisation or implicit description of the object.

3. Iterative - numerically solving an optimisation problem.

Page 20: Design of 3d printed math art

Manual trefoil

Cubic Trefoil Knot Pendant by Vertigo Polka

Page 21: Design of 3d printed math art

Parametric trefoils

Page 22: Design of 3d printed math art

Iterative trefoils

KnotPlot by Robert Scharein

Minimal rope length by Jason Cantarella

Page 23: Design of 3d printed math art

Iterative trefoils

KnotPlot by Robert Scharein

Minimal rope length by Jason Cantarella

Page 24: Design of 3d printed math art

Iterative trefoils

KnotPlot by Robert Scharein Minimal rope length by Jason Cantarella

Page 25: Design of 3d printed math art

Iterative trefoils

KnotPlot by Robert Scharein Minimal rope length by Jason Cantarella

Page 26: Design of 3d printed math art

Even more trefoils, by Laura Taalman

Page 27: Design of 3d printed math art

Aesthetic choices

How should we choose a geometrical representation of a topologicalobject?

1. Make as few choices as possible.2. Be as faithful as possible.

What we really want is a canonical geometric structure on atopological object.

When we find such a canonical structure we get a clean path frommathematics to computer model. With 3D printing we continuethis path to physical object. This is a different situation fromcreating sculptures in clay or stone, where it is much harder tocontrol the geometry precisely.

Page 28: Design of 3d printed math art

Aesthetic choices

How should we choose a geometrical representation of a topologicalobject?

1. Make as few choices as possible.2. Be as faithful as possible.

What we really want is a canonical geometric structure on atopological object.

When we find such a canonical structure we get a clean path frommathematics to computer model. With 3D printing we continuethis path to physical object. This is a different situation fromcreating sculptures in clay or stone, where it is much harder tocontrol the geometry precisely.

Page 29: Design of 3d printed math art

Aesthetic choices

How should we choose a geometrical representation of a topologicalobject?

1. Make as few choices as possible.2. Be as faithful as possible.

What we really want is a canonical geometric structure on atopological object.

When we find such a canonical structure we get a clean path frommathematics to computer model. With 3D printing we continuethis path to physical object. This is a different situation fromcreating sculptures in clay or stone, where it is much harder tocontrol the geometry precisely.

Page 30: Design of 3d printed math art

Aesthetic choices

How should we choose a geometrical representation of a topologicalobject?

1. Make as few choices as possible.2. Be as faithful as possible.

What we really want is a canonical geometric structure on atopological object.

When we find such a canonical structure we get a clean path frommathematics to computer model. With 3D printing we continuethis path to physical object. This is a different situation fromcreating sculptures in clay or stone, where it is much harder tocontrol the geometry precisely.

Page 31: Design of 3d printed math art

Example: Möbius ladders

Mobius Bangle by Denzyl

Basterfield

Double Trouble by Tones3-D

Square Mobius Ribbed by Vertigo

Polka

linked mobius by Zorink

Interlocking Möbius Ladders by

Schleimer and Segerman

Page 32: Design of 3d printed math art

Example: Möbius ladders

Mobius Bangle by Denzyl

Basterfield

Double Trouble by Tones3-D

Square Mobius Ribbed by Vertigo

Polka

linked mobius by ZorinkInterlocking Möbius Ladders by

Schleimer and Segerman

Page 33: Design of 3d printed math art

In our version, the rungs meet the poles at right angles.

It is parametrised inS3 = {(w , x , y , z) ∈ R4 | w2 + x2 + y2 + z2 = 1} by

f (θ, τ) = (cos(θ) cos(τ), cos(θ) sin(τ), sin(θ) cos(τ/2), sin(θ) sin(τ/2))

for θ in a small interval and 0 ≤ τ < 2π.

Then fθ ⊥ fτ , and their images after stereographic projection fromS3 to R3 are also perpendicular, since stereographic projection isconformal.

Page 34: Design of 3d printed math art

In our version, the rungs meet the poles at right angles.

It is parametrised inS3 = {(w , x , y , z) ∈ R4 | w2 + x2 + y2 + z2 = 1} by

f (θ, τ) = (cos(θ) cos(τ), cos(θ) sin(τ), sin(θ) cos(τ/2), sin(θ) sin(τ/2))

for θ in a small interval and 0 ≤ τ < 2π.

Then fθ ⊥ fτ , and their images after stereographic projection fromS3 to R3 are also perpendicular, since stereographic projection isconformal.

Page 35: Design of 3d printed math art

In our version, the rungs meet the poles at right angles.

It is parametrised inS3 = {(w , x , y , z) ∈ R4 | w2 + x2 + y2 + z2 = 1} by

f (θ, τ) = (cos(θ) cos(τ), cos(θ) sin(τ), sin(θ) cos(τ/2), sin(θ) sin(τ/2))

for θ in a small interval and 0 ≤ τ < 2π.

Then fθ ⊥ fτ , and their images after stereographic projection fromS3 to R3 are also perpendicular, since stereographic projection isconformal.

Page 36: Design of 3d printed math art

Stereographic projection

Page 37: Design of 3d printed math art

Iterative Seifert surfaces

SeifertView, by Jarke J. van Wijk, http://www.win.tue.nl/~vanwijk/seifertview/.

Page 38: Design of 3d printed math art

Parametric Seifert surfaces via Milnor fibers(joint work with Saul Schleimer)

Page 39: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 40: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 41: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 42: Design of 3d printed math art

Comparison

Page 43: Design of 3d printed math art

Comparison

Page 44: Design of 3d printed math art

Comparison

Page 45: Design of 3d printed math art

Comparison

Page 46: Design of 3d printed math art

Comparison

Page 47: Design of 3d printed math art

Borromean rings

Page 48: Design of 3d printed math art

Borromean rings

Page 49: Design of 3d printed math art

Borromean rings

Page 50: Design of 3d printed math art

Example: Hypercube

Page 51: Design of 3d printed math art

Orthogonal projection of a cube

Page 52: Design of 3d printed math art

Orthogonal projection of a hypercube

Hypercube B by Bathsheba Grossman.

Page 53: Design of 3d printed math art

Perspective projection of a cube

Page 54: Design of 3d printed math art

Perspective projection of a cube

Page 55: Design of 3d printed math art

Perspective projection of a hypercube

Hypercube A by Bathsheba Grossman.

Page 56: Design of 3d printed math art

A better method: radially project the cube to the sphere...

Page 57: Design of 3d printed math art

A better method: radially project the cube to the sphere...

Page 58: Design of 3d printed math art

...then stereographically project to the plane

Page 59: Design of 3d printed math art

...then stereographically project to the plane

Page 60: Design of 3d printed math art

Do the same thing one dimension up for a hypercube

Page 61: Design of 3d printed math art

Do the same thing one dimension up for a hypercube

Page 62: Design of 3d printed math art

Thickening in S3 is better than thickening in R3

The ratio of distances between objects to thicknesses of objects isconstant if we thicken in S3, but varies if we thicken in R3. So theformer retains more symmetry.

Page 63: Design of 3d printed math art

More regular 4-dimensional polytopes

16-cell

24-cell

Half of a 120-cell

Half of a 600-cell

Page 64: Design of 3d printed math art

Quintessence (joint work with Saul Schleimer)

Page 65: Design of 3d printed math art

More fun than a hypercube of monkeys(joint work with Will Segerman)

Page 66: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 67: Design of 3d printed math art

Mobiles (joint work with Marco Mahler)

Page 68: Design of 3d printed math art

Mobiles (joint work with Marco Mahler)

Page 69: Design of 3d printed math art

Mobiles (joint work with Marco Mahler)

Page 70: Design of 3d printed math art

These designs require a very efficient method of thickening a graph:We need a small number of polygons per edge or vertex.

Boolean operations on spheres and cylinders don’t work reliably.

Page 71: Design of 3d printed math art

These designs require a very efficient method of thickening a graph:We need a small number of polygons per edge or vertex.

Boolean operations on spheres and cylinders don’t work reliably.

Page 72: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 73: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 74: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 75: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 76: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 77: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 78: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 79: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 80: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 81: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 82: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 83: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 84: Design of 3d printed math art

Triple gear (joint work with Saul Schleimer)

Page 85: Design of 3d printed math art

Manchester Metroshuttle advertisement, photocredit: Bill Beaty

Cooperative learning logo from the University ofSaskatchewan.

Three pairwise meshing gears are usually frozen...

A challenge: Find a triple of pairwise meshing gears that moves!

Page 86: Design of 3d printed math art

Manchester Metroshuttle advertisement, photocredit: Bill Beaty

Cooperative learning logo from the University ofSaskatchewan.

Three pairwise meshing gears are usually frozen...

A challenge: Find a triple of pairwise meshing gears that moves!

Page 87: Design of 3d printed math art

Manchester Metroshuttle advertisement, photocredit: Bill Beaty

Cooperative learning logo from the University ofSaskatchewan.

Three pairwise meshing gears are usually frozen...

A challenge: Find a triple of pairwise meshing gears that moves!

Page 88: Design of 3d printed math art

“Umbilic Rolling Link” by Helaman Ferguson. “Knotted Gear” by Oskar van Deventer.

Our solution is inspired by these “linked” gears.

They have two “gears”; we want to do the same with three.

Page 89: Design of 3d printed math art

“Umbilic Rolling Link” by Helaman Ferguson. “Knotted Gear” by Oskar van Deventer.

Our solution is inspired by these “linked” gears.

They have two “gears”; we want to do the same with three.

Page 90: Design of 3d printed math art

We chose the three-component Hopf link as the basis of the design.

We gradually inflate the three rings, letting them bump againsteach other while preserving the 3-fold symmetry, until they reachmaximum thickness.

Page 91: Design of 3d printed math art

We had hoped that these rings would only be able to rotate alongtheir axes.

But unfortunately, they can move out of place, and thenthere is a little more room to inflate them further.

To stop them moving out of place, we design gear teeth.

Page 92: Design of 3d printed math art

We had hoped that these rings would only be able to rotate alongtheir axes. But unfortunately, they can move out of place, and thenthere is a little more room to inflate them further.

To stop them moving out of place, we design gear teeth.

Page 93: Design of 3d printed math art

We had hoped that these rings would only be able to rotate alongtheir axes. But unfortunately, they can move out of place, and thenthere is a little more room to inflate them further.

To stop them moving out of place, we design gear teeth.

Page 94: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 95: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 96: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 97: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 98: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 99: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 100: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 101: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 102: Design of 3d printed math art

To design the teeth, we investigate how the rings touch each other.

Page 103: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.

The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 104: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 105: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 106: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 107: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 108: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 109: Design of 3d printed math art

The “inner” teeth are the images of planes in toroidal coordinates.The “outer” teeth are determined by “carving”.

Page 110: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 111: Design of 3d printed math art

Alternative solutions

Page 112: Design of 3d printed math art

Developing fractal curves(joint work with Geoffrey Irving)

Page 113: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 114: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 115: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 116: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 117: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 118: Design of 3d printed math art

Hinged negatively curved surfaces(joint work with Geoffrey Irving)

Page 119: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 120: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 121: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 122: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 123: Design of 3d printed math art
Page 124: Design of 3d printed math art

ReferencesI Sculptural Forms from Hyperbolic Tessellations, George W. Hart,

2008.I The Quaternion Group as a Symmetry Group, Vi Hart and Henry

Segerman, 2014.I Developing fractal curves, Geoffrey Irving and Henry Segerman,

2013.I On the 3-dimensional Brieskorn manifolds M(p, q, r), John Milnor,

1975.I Sculptures in S3, Saul Schleimer and Henry Segerman, 2012.I Triple gear, Saul Schleimer and Henry Segerman, 2013.I Puzzling the 120-cell, Saul Schleimer and Henry Segerman, 2013.I 3D printing for mathematical visualisation, Henry Segerman, 2012.I Triangle groups, automorphic forms, and torus knots., V. V. Tsanov,

2010.I Visualization of the Genus of Knots, Jarke J. van Wijk, Arjeh M.

Cohen, 2005.I Visualization of Seifert Surfaces, Jarke J. van Wijk, Arjeh M.

Cohen, 2006.

Page 125: Design of 3d printed math art

Thanks!

segerman.orgmath.okstate.edu/~segerman/youtube.com/henrysegshapeways.com/shops/henrysegthingiverse.com/henryseg