18
Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors & Omissions Government of Nepal Ministry of Education Central Level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU) Alec Gray & Ishwary Prasad Kharel

Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools

Common Design Errors & Omissions

Government of Nepal Ministry of EducationCentral Level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU)

Alec Gray & Ishwary Prasad Kharel

Page 2: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

GENERAL

Nepal Building Code issues

Seismic Design Code NBC105: 1994

……..compare with………

Mandatory Rules of Thumb/Guidelines NBC 201 to 205

NBC105 and NBC 110 are for Engineers. The MRT/Guidelines are pre engineered

Structural details are only shown in NBC 201 to 205

Page 3: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

Not a single design refers the NBC 110 for Designof concrete structure. Noteworthy is that thisstandards rejects any amendment/revision on IS456 -1978 onwards.

(IS4326-IS 1893 part-1-IS 13920-IS 456)

As per IS 1893(Part 1) Importance factor for school

buildings should be 1.5.

Page 4: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

DoE Structural Criteria-Schools are Public Buildings: Higher standards

apply

Many designers apparently do not read this document!

Page 5: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

Design Reports often lack critical information.

•Poor documentation indicates poor design

•Design Calculation for some critical condition.

•Uplift and overturning for lateral and wind load.

•Site information and hazard mapping as per NBC

108.

•Sanitary and electrical drawings.

•Other environmental and safety concern.

Design submissions often disregard the CLPIU

checklists.

Page 6: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

CONCRETE

Starter bars from columns into horizontal RC bands

Not shown nor included in the Steel Bending Chart

Page 7: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

RC bands for infill masonry walls

Not shown

Page 8: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

•RC bands in end walls: Often missing or shown at

only ½ wall height: They must be at both 1/3 and

2/3 wall height.

•RC band on top of parapet wall: Often not shown

as reinforced and the rebar often not detailed

correctly at the corners.

•Gable ends with masonry infill: RC band enclosing

the gable end often missing.

•RC Band at top of cross wall: often missing.

Page 9: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

STEEL FRAME AND ROOF TRUSS DESIGNRoof truss Holding Down (HD) bolt arrangement

Not shown.Diagonal wind bracing

Not shown.

Weld sizes & steel

protection treatment

Not shown.

Steel frame section sizes

Not shown or use incorrect or section

reference

Page 10: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &
Page 11: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

LOAD BEARING MASONRY

RC bands at sill, lintel and eaves level

Stitch bands at corners not shown.

Not shown. See NBC 202 Load Bearing Masonry

Page 12: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

Vertical steel reinforcing through masonry at

corners, intersecting walls, and wall ends.

Not shown.

Page 13: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

Type of masonryNote: dressed stone masonry is preferred by DoE

Not shown

Connection of masonry infill walls to steel

frames

Method of connection: Not shown

Page 16: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &
Page 17: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &
Page 18: Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schoolssolutions.ait.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/...Design & Construction of Earthquake Resilient Schools Common Design Errors &

QUESTIONS?

Thank you