Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4287
Article History: Received Date: Jan. 09, 2018 Accepted Date: May. 16, 2019 Available Online: Jul. 01, 2019
Design and Analysis of Hybrid PSO-GA-FA Technique for Load Frequency
Control of Two-Area Power System
Hatef Farshi
Department of Electrical Engineering, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
Phone Number: +98-4532526170
*Corresponding Author's E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
he Load Frequency Control (LFC) or Automatic Generation Control (AGC) is one of the
substantial parts in power system design, automation, operation and stability. In this paper, the
new hybrid technique are proposed in which Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm
and Firefly Algorithm (named hPSO-GA-FA) are combined to obtain the parameters of Two Degree of
Freedom PID (2DOF-PID) controllers for LFC problem of two-area hydrothermal power system. The
objective function used in this paper is combination of IAE, ISE, ITAE and ITSE. The responses of
mentioned approach are compared with Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) based 2DOF-
PID and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Controllers. The simulation results in some scenarios show
that proposed hPSO-GA-FA based 2DOF-PID controller achieves better responses in comparison with
TLBO and ANN.
Keywords: Load Frequency Control, 2DOF-PID Controller, Hybrid PSO-GA-FA, Teaching-Learning-
Based Optimization, Artificial Neural Network
1. Introduction
The successful operation of interconnected power systems needs matching the total generation
with the total load demand and with the associated system losses. By passing time, the operating point
of a power system may face some changes, and hence, systems may experience deviations in system's
nominal frequency and scheduled power exchanges to other interconnected areas, which may yield
undesirable impacts on power system [10]. Therefore, the control strategy is needed to overcome
these kinds of problems. LFC is one of the most important issues in electric power system design,
stability, automation and operation for supplying sufficient and reliable electric power with good
quality. The main purposes of LFC for a power system are generally as follows:
Maintaining frequency in its nominal value or within predetermined limits.
Maintaining the transferred power between the areas at prescribed levels.
Maintaining each unit generation in the best possible economic value.
Obtaining acceptable overshoot, undershoot and settling time on the frequency and tie line
power deviations [10],[8].
The researchers all over the world are trying to introduce several control strategies for LFC of power
systems in order to restore the system frequency and tie line power to their scheduled values or close
T
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4288
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
to them in the fastest possible time during load perturbations. Some state-of-the-art survey and review
articles on the LFC of power systems has been presented in [10], [18] where various control strategies
concerning LFC problem have been studied. Moreover, there are many research articles attempting to
propose better control methods for LFC systems based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [9], [7], fuzzy
logic theory [2], reinforcement learning [13] and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)
approach [20].
Various Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have been proposed for LFC problem to improve the
performance of a power system. Some of these approaches include Imperialist Competitive Algorithm
(ICA) [8], Firefly Algorithm (FA) [12], Differential Evolution (DE) [1], Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) [6],
Quasi-Oppositional Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (QOGWOA) [3], Teaching Learning Based
Optimization Algorithm (TLBO) [17], Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA) [15], Elephant Herding
Optimization (EHO) [4] and so on.
In addition to the above examples, there are also hybrid algorithms used to LFC problem such as
[16], in which hybrid Firefly Algorithm and Pattern Search (hFA-PS) technique is used to optimize PID
parameters for AGC of multi-area interconnected power systems and the results prove that the
proposed hFA–PS algorithm provide better performance compared to some techniques such as BFOA
and GA for the same interconnected power system. Also, in [19], hybrid Bacteria Foraging Optimization
Algorithm-Particle Swarm Optimization (hBFOA–PSO) method is applied to obtain the PI controller
parameters of a two-area interconnected power system and the results indicate the superiority of
mentioned methods over PSO, GA and BFOA.
As mentioned, there are many articles in the area of LFC problems using AI algorithms specially
tuning of PID controller parameters but it is better to use the advantages and features of several
algorithms, by combining them, instead of just one algorithm. So, the hybrid PSO-GA-FA algorithm is
used to optimize the 2DOF-PID controllers' parameters for two-area interconnected power system in
this paper. The mentioned method is applied for this controller by the objective function, which is the
sum of IAE, ISE, ITAE and ITSE (it will be explained in section 3.2), and their results are compared with
TLBO based 2DOF-PID and Multi-Layer Perceptron ANN (MLP-ANN) controllers.
2. Investigated LFC model
Generally, power system consists of number of subsystems interconnected through tie lines. The
investigated LFC system, in this paper, consists of two hydro-thermal areas. Area 1 is a thermal unit
and area 2 is a hydro unit. The thermal unit of investigated power system consists of governor and
steam turbine with reheater. Hydro area includes electric governor and hydro turbine. The dynamic
model of two-area interconnected power system is shown in Figure 1.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4289
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Figure 1: Two-area hydrothermal power system.
3. Control System
3.1. 2DOF-PID controller
The number of closed loop transfer functions that can be adjusted independently is defined as the
degree of freedom for a control system. The 2DOF-PID controller provides an output signal based on
the difference between a reference signal and a measured output of the system. This controller
computes a weighted difference signal for each of the proportional, integral, and derivative actions
according to the certain set point weights. The output of the controller is sum of the proportional,
integral, and derivative actions. Each action is weighted according to the selected gain parameters. A
derivative filter is used to improve performance when there is random error or noise in the measured
process variables. The derivative filter is employed to limit the large controller output shifts that
derivative action causes as a result of measurement noise.
Also, derivative filter can help to decrease the constant controller output fluctuations which can
lead to wear in the final control element. Obviously the above reasons show that two degree of
freedom control system has advantages over conventional single degree of freedom control system
[15]. The control system of a parallel 2DOF-PID controller is shown in Figure 2 where R(s), Y(s) and U(s)
are reference signal, feedback from measured output of the system and output signal, respectively.
For a 2DOF-PID controller, C(s) and F(s) are given by Equations (4) and (5) respectively.
Figure 2: 2DOF-PID controller model.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4290
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
(1)
(2)
where kp, ki, kd, b, c and N are the proportional gain, integral gain, derivative gain, proportional set
point weight, derivative set point weight and derivative filter coefficient respectively. The structure
of a parallel 2DOF-PID controller is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Structure of a parallel 2DOF-PID controller.
3.2. Objective function
In this paper, the objective function (J) is sum of Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Square Error
(ISE), Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) and Integral Time Square Error (ITSE). The mentioned
objective function is given as follows:
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4291
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
ΔP, Δf and ACE are tie-line power deviation, frequency deviation and area control error.
3.3. hPSO-GA-FA based 2DOF-PID controller
PSO is a population based optimization technique based on intelligent scheme, proposed and
developed by Kennedy and Eberhart in 1995, inspired by the social behaviour of bird flocking or fish
schooling. In this algorithm, there are a number of birds called particles. PSO is initialized with a group
of random particles and then searches for optimal value by updating each generation. All particles
have not only fitness values which are evaluated by the objective function to be optimized, but also
velocities which direct the flying of the particles. The particles fly through the search space by following
the particles with the best solutions ever found [11].
GA is a global search technique for solving optimization problems, which is based on the theory of
natural selection, proposed by Holland in 1975. It is a repetitive search procedure that operates on a
set of strings called chromosomes. The implementation of this algorithm is briefly listed in the
following process [11]:
Initialize the chromosome strings of population.
Decode the strings and assess them.
Choose the best strings.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4292
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Copy the best strings and paste them on the non-selected strings.
Combine and develop it to generate off strings.
Update the genetic cycle and stop the process.
FA is a population-based algorithm developed by Yang in 2008. In this algorithm, fireflies are
characterized by their flashing light which produced by their body's biochemical process. The flashing
light may serve as the main courtship signals for mating. It is based on the following three idealized
behaviours of the fireflies flashing characteristics [14]:
All fireflies are unisex and attracted to other fireflies regardless of their gender.
The firefly's degree of attractiveness is proportional to its brightness (light intensity). So, for any
two flashing fireflies, less bright firefly moves toward the brighter one. More brightness means
less distance between two fireflies because brightness is proportional to distance. If any two
flashing fireflies have the same brightness, then they move randomly.
The brightness of a firefly is determined by the objective function.
For proper design of FA, two important issues need to be defined: the variation of light intensity (I)
and the formulation of attractiveness ( ). The attractiveness of a firefly is determined by its light
intensity or brightness and the brightness is associated with the objective function. The light intensity
I(r) varies with the distance (r) monotonically and exponentially as:
(14)
where I0 is the original light intensity and is the light absorption coefficient. Because the firefly’s
attractiveness is proportional to the light intensity, the attractiveness (β) of a firefly is defined as:
(15)
where is the attractiveness at r=0.
The distance between two fireflies (si and sj) is expressed as:
(16)
where n denotes the dimensionality of the problem.
The movement of fireflies is expressed as below:
(17)
This equation consists of three parts: the current position of ith firefly (Si), attraction to another more
attractive firefly , and a random walk (αεi) which consists of a randomization parameter
(α) and the random generated number (ε). It should be noted that , β and ϒ are generally chosen in the
range 0–1. In summary, FA is controlled by these three parameters: α, β, and γ. According to the
parameter setting, each implementation of FA distinguishes two asymptotic behaviours. First, if γ→0,
the attractiveness becomes β=β0. So, within the search space the attractiveness is constant. Second,
if γ→∞, falls out from Equation (17), and the firefly movement becomes a random
walk [16], [19]. Generally, the random nature of GA operators makes this algorithm sensitive to initial
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4293
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
population. This dependence to initial population is the reason that GA may not converge properly if
the initial population is not well chosen. On the other hand, PSO is not as sensitive as GA to initial
population and it has been indicated that PSO converge rapidly during the initial stages of a global
search, but around global optimum, the search process will become very slow. One of the features of
PSO is its fast convergence towards global optima in the early stage of the search and its slow
convergence near the global optima [11].
FA can find the global optima as well as all the local optima simultaneously in a very effective
manner. A further advantage of FA is that different fireflies will work almost independently; it is thus
particularly suitable for parallel implementation. Furthermore, fireflies aggregate more closely around
each optimum and the interactions between different sub-regions are minimal in parallel
implementations.
Therefore, FA can overcome both GA and PSO deficiencies [12], [14]. In this paper, the idea is the
combination of FA, PSO and GA, to overcome the mentioned algorithms' problems and obtain better
dynamic responses. It could be noted that the hPSO-GAFA results are obtained in lower iteration than
FA, PSO and GA and, thus, this hybrid algorithm could be used for many optimization problems.
In the first step of solving the optimization problem, objective function, variables and each
algorithm's parameters are defined. The objective function values are evaluated in MATLAB/SIMULINK
model and moved to main PSO program through workspace. Then PSO algorithm will create an initial
population and particles value is determined by objective function and rank of particles as well as best
one is recorded.
This process searches for optima by updating generation, velocity and position until the stopping
criteria is met or iteration finished. When the evaluation and iteration of PSO finished, the GA starts
to work and continues to solve the optimization problem step by step; population selection, crossover
and mutation. Afterwards, FA begins its process by evaluation of fireflies' light intensities and update
them till the iteration finished.
The hPSO-GA-FA flowchart is shown in Figure 4. The values of hPSO-GA-FA parameters are set
accordingly; Population size=100, hPSO-GA-FA Iteration=100, PSO sub-iteration=10, GA sub-
iteration=10, FA sub-iteration=10, Parents (off springs) Ratio=0.7, Mutants Population size Ratio=0.2,
PSO parameter (C1 and C2)=1.5, PSO momentum or inertia=0.73, α=0.5, β=0.2, γ=0.5. The proposed
hPSO-GA-FA will optimize the parameters of 2DOF-PID controllers with the mentioned objective
functions.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4294
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Figure 4: hPSO-GA-FA flowchart.
3.4. TLBO based 2DOF-PID controller
The TLBO algorithm is an algorithm proposed by Rao and et al. (2011, 2012) based on the effect of
influence of a teacher on the output of learners in a class. The algorithm describes two basic modes of
the learning [17]:
through teacher (known as teacher phase)
through interaction with the other learners (known as learner phase)
In this optimization algorithm, a group of learners is considered as population and different subjects
offered to the learners are considered as different design variables of the optimization problem. The
best solution in the entire population is considered as the teacher. The design variables are actually
the parameters involved in the objective function of the given optimization problem and the best
solution is the best value of the objective function.
As mentioned, TLBO is divided into two parts; teacher phase and learner phase.
In teacher phase, it is assumed that a good teacher brings his or her learners up to his or her level in
terms of knowledge. But this is impossible, in practice, and a teacher can only move the mean of a
class up depending on the potency of the class.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4295
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
In learner phase, learners increase their knowledge by two different means; through input from the teacher and through interaction between themselves. A learner interacts randomly with other learners by discussions, presentations, formal
communications, etc. A learner learns something new if the other learner has more knowledge
optimize the parameters of 2DOF-PID with the objective functions expressed in Equation (13). Unlike
other optimization techniques, TLBO does not require any algorithm parameters to be tuned, thus
making its implementation simpler.
3.5. ANN controller
The ability of human brain to control complex systems has encouraged researchers to model the
human nervous system. So, artificial neural networks are used in various scientific and industrial
branches, especially the design of controllers due to their unique capability to learn any type of
nonlinear system. An ANN consists of a number of nonlinear elements which are arranged in three
layers; Input layer, Hidden layer and Output Layer. Each layer usually contains several neurons and the
output of each neuron is usually the inputs of the next layer neurons. The input layer receives the input
signals, and then these signals propagate layer-to-layer through the network in order to apply the
investigated system.
Figure 5: TLBO flowchart.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4296
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
The mathematical model of the neuron that represents the basic elements of an ANN is shown in
Figure 6. It consists of three fundamental elements; weight (W), bias factor (θ) and activation
function (f). The neural network output (y) is given below [5]:
Figure 6: The mathematical model of a neuron.
In this paper, the multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) controller is also used
for the investigated two-area power system. Since the purposes of LFC controller design in an
interconnected power system are damping of the frequency and tie-line power deviations in such a
way to minimize transient oscillation under the different load conditions [9]. Thus, frequency
deviations (Δf) and area control error (ACE) are chosen as the MLP-ANN inputs. The outputs of the
neural network are the control signals, which are applied to the governors in each area. Figure 7 shows
the block diagram of the MLP-ANN controller in each area. It means that an ANN controller is placed
in each area of the system. As seen in the Figure 7, ACE and ΔF of each area are entered into the MLP-
ANN, and then, by performing the neural network process, the control signal u is exited from the
controller and applied to the system.
Figure 7: The block diagram of MLP-ANN controller in each area.
Mentioned MLP-ANN is a three-layer perceptron with two inputs, 11 neurons in the hidden layer, and
one output. The activation functions used in hidden and output layers are tansig and purelin,
respectively. The proposed network has been trained by using Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The
root mean square (RMS) error criterion is being used to evaluate the learning performance. Learning
algorithms cause the adjustment of the weights so that the controlled system gives the desired
response [9]. The schematic of this three-layer perceptron neural network with a hidden layer is shown
in Figure 8.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4297
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Figure 8: The schematic of 3-layer perceptron neural network.
4. Results and analysis
In this paper, three controllers are applied to LFC problem of two-area interconnected hydrothermal
power system; hPSO-GA-FA based 2DOF-PID, TLBO based 2DOF-PID and MLP-ANN controllers. The
controllers used in each area are similar. Two scenarios are used as follows:
first scenario: 1% step load perturbation (SLP) in both thermal and hydro area
second scenario: 10% SLP in thermal area and 15% SLP in hydro area
The dynamic responses of frequency and tie-line power deviation by these three controllers for
two mentioned scenarios are shown in Figures 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 and they are compared with
each other. Also, 2DOF-PID parameters obtained by hPSO-GA-FA and TLBO are shown in Table 1and
detailed information for frequency and tie-line power deviation is shown in Table 2.
Figure 9: Δf1 in first scenario
Figure 10: Δf2 in first scenario.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4298
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Figure 11: ΔP12 in first scenario
Figure 12: Δf1 in second scenario.
Figure 13: Δf2 in second scenario.
Figure 14: ΔP12 in second scenario.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4299
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Table 1: 2DOF-PID controllers' parameters.
Table 2: Detailed information for three controllers.
The above table shows the settling time improvement (by percent) for frequency and tie-line power
deviation of hPSO-GA-FA based 2DOF-PID in comparison with two other controllers. So, it could be
concluded that the proposed hybrid algorithm performs better than TLBO based 2DOF-PID and ANN
controllers.
Conclusion
In this paper, 2DOF-PID and ANN controllers have employed for LFC of two-area interconnected
hydro-thermal power system. Accordingly, LFC model has first simulated in MATLAB/SIMULINK and
the parameters of 2DOF-PID controller have determined by two metaheuristic algorithms; hPSO-GAFA
and TLBO. Then, MLP-ANN controller has also applied in this system. Finally, the three controllers'
results with two different SLP scenarios have compared with each other. Consequently, it has shown
in results and analysis section that hPSO-GA-FA based 2DOF-PID controller has superiority in
comparison with TLBO based 2DOF-PID and MLP-ANN controllers.
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4300
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Appendix f=Nominal system frequency=60Hz, R=Governor speed regulation parameter=2.4Hz/p.u. MW,
Tg=Steam governor time constant=0.08s, Kr=Steam turbine reheat constant=0.5, Tr=Steam turbine
reheat time constant=10s, Tt=Steam turbine time constant=0.3s, B= Frequency bias factor=0.424,
TP=Power system time constant=20s, Tw=Water starting time=1s, KP=Power system gain=120Hz/p.u.
MW, Kd=Electric governor derivative gain=4, Kp=Electric governor proportional gain=1, Ki=Electric
governor integral gain=5, a12=Ratio between the base values of two area=-1, T12=Synchronizing
coefficient=0.086p.u. MW/radians.
References
[1]. B. Mohanty, S. Panda and P. K. Hota, “Differential evolution algorithm based automatic generation control for
interconnected power systems with non-linearity, ” Alexandria Eng J, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 537-552, 2014.
[2]. C. Ertugrul and I. Kocaarslan, “Load frequency control in two area power systems using fuzzy logic controller, ” Energ
Convers Manage, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 233–243, 2005.
[3]. D. Guha, P. K. Roy and S. Banerjee, “Load frequency control of large scale power system using quasi-oppositional grey
wolf optimization algorithm, ” Eng Sci & Technol an Int J, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1693-1713, 2016.
[4]. D. K. Sambariya and R. Fagana, “Load frequency control of multi-area hydro thermal power system using elephant
herding optimization technique, ” J Automation & Control, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25-36, 2017.
[5]. H. Bevrani and T. Hiyama, “Intelligent automatic generation control,” USA: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 95-104, 2011.
[6]. H. Gozde, M. C. Taplamacioglu and I. Kocaarslan, “Comparative performance analysis of artificial bee colony algorithm
in automatic generation control for interconnected reheat thermal power system, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 42, No.1, pp.
167–178, 2012.
[7]. H. L. Zeynelgil, A. Demiroren and N. S. Sengor, “The application of ANN technique to automatic generation control for
multi-area power system, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 345–354, 2002.
[8]. H. Shabani, B. Vahidi and M. Ebrahimpour, “A robust PID controller based on imperialist competitive algorithm for load-
frequency control of power systems,” ISA T, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 88–95, 2013.
[9]. H. Shayeghi and H. A. Shayanfar, “Application of ANN technique based on μ-synthesis to load frequency control of
interconnected power system,” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 503– 511, 2006.
[10]. H. Shayeghi, H.A. Shayanfar and A. Jalili, “Load frequency control strategies: A state-of-the-art survey for the
researcher,” Energ Convers Manage, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 344–353, 2009.
[11]. H.Farshi and K. Valipour, “Hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for automatic generation control of multi-area power system,
” IOSR J Electr & Electron Eng, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 18-29, 2016.
[12]. L. C. Saikia and S. K. Sahu, “Automatic generation control of a combined cycle gas turbine plant with classical
controllers using firefly algorithm, ” Int J Elec Power,; Vol. 53, pp. 27–33, 2013.
[13]. L. C. Saikia, S. Mishra, N. Sinha and J. Nanda, “Automatic generation control of a multi area hydrothermal system
using reinforced learning neural network controller, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1101–1108, 2011.
[14]. L. S. Coelho and V.C. Mariani, “Firefly algorithm approach based on chaotic Tinkerbell map applied to multivariable
PID controller tuning, ” Comput Math with Appl, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 2371–2382, 2012.
[15]. P. Dash, L. C. Saikia and N. Sinha, “Comparison of performances of several Cuckoo search algorithm based 2DOF
controllers in AGC of multi-area thermal system, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol.55, pp. 429–436, 2014.
[16]. R. K. Sahu, S. Panda and S. Padhan, “A hybrid firefly algorithm and pattern search technique for automatic
generation control of multi area power systems, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 64, pp. 9–23, 2015.
[17]. R.K. Sahu, S. Panda, U.K. Rout and D. K. Sahoo, “Teaching learning based optimization algorithm for automatic
generation control of power system using 2-DOF PID controller, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 77, pp. 287-301, 2016.
[18]. S. K. Pandey, S.R. Mohanty and N. Kishor, “A literature survey on load–frequency control for conventional and
distribution generation power systems,” Renew Sust Energ Rev, Vol. 25, pp. 318–334, 2013.
[19]. S. Panda, B. Mohanty and P. K. Hota, “Hybrid BFOA–PSO algorithm for automatic generation control of linear and
nonlinear interconnected power systems, ” Appl Soft Comput, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 4718–4730, 2013.
[20]. S. R. Khuntia and S. Panda, “Simulation study for automatic generation control of a multi-area power system by
ANFIS approach, ” Appl Soft Comput, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 333–341, 2012.
[21]. International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC) Universal Scientific
Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
Hatef Farshi / Vol. 9(33), Jul. 2019, PP. 4287-4301
4301
International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology (IJMEC)
Universal Scientific Organization, www.aeuso.org PISSN: 2411-6173, EISSN: 2305-0543
[22]. L. S. Coelho and V.C. Mariani, “Firefly algorithm approach based on chaotic Tinkerbell map applied to multivariable
PID controller tuning, ” Comput Math with Appl, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 2371–2382, 2012.
[23]. P. Dash, L. C. Saikia and N. Sinha, “Comparison of performances of several Cuckoo search algorithm based 2DOF
controllers in AGC of multi-area thermal system, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol.55, pp. 429–436, 2014.
[24]. R. K. Sahu, S. Panda and S. Padhan, “A hybrid firefly algorithm and pattern search technique for automatic
generation control of multi area power systems, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 64, pp. 9–23, 2015.
[25]. R.K. Sahu, S. Panda, U.K. Rout and D. K. Sahoo, “Teaching learning based optimization algorithm for automatic
generation control of power system using 2-DOF PID controller, ” Int J Elec Power, Vol. 77, pp. 287-301, 2016.
[26]. S. K. Pandey, S.R. Mohanty and N. Kishor, “A literature survey on load–frequency control for conventional and
distribution generation power systems,” Renew Sust Energ Rev, Vol. 25, pp. 318–334, 2013.
[27]. S. Panda, B. Mohanty and P. K. Hota, “Hybrid BFOA–PSO algorithm for automatic generation control of linear and
nonlinear interconnected power systems, ” Appl Soft Comput, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 4718–4730, 2013.
[28]. S. R. Khuntia and S. Panda, “Simulation study for automatic generation control of a multi-area power system by
ANFIS approach, ” Appl Soft Comput, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 333–341, 2012.
Author
Hatef Farshi was born in Meshkin Shahr, Iran, 1990. He received the B.Sc. of electrical engineering from Islamic Azad University-Ardabil Branch in 2013 and M.Sc. degree of electrical engineering from Mohaghegh Ardabili University in 2016. His research interests include application of artificial intelligence in power systems, power system dynamics, renewable energy and distributed generation.
Email: [email protected] Phone Number: +98-4532526170