Upload
esmond-kelley-garrison
View
221
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards – A time of change
Sam CoxKnowledge Officer (Legal and
Welfare Rights)
Introduction
• What are DOLS?• Is change needed - problems with the current
system• The Law Commission consultation
What are DOLS?
• An independent check to ensure that where a person’s care results in them being deprived of their liberty it is the right thing to do
• It is a process of making this check• They only apply to care homes and hospitals
What safeguards do theyprovide?• The independent assessment by 2
professionals• If authorised will be appointed a RPR• Enable appeals• Renewal date set• Coroner’s inquest
A time for change?
Human rights system will cripple social care
CELEBRITY NEWS AND GOSSIP WORLD EXCLUSIVES
THE
SUN SHINE
Human rights gone mad as used to ban family from seeing relative
THE DAILY NEWSwww.dailynews.com THE WORLD’S FAVOURITE NEWSPAPER - Since 1879
Families left distraught after being told they must wait months to bury loved ones
CELEBRITY NEWS AND GOSSIP WORLD EXCLUSIVES
THE
SUN SHINE
Law now impossible to follow leaving many people without rights
House of Lords say DOLS are ‘not fit for purpose’
THE DAILY NEWSwww.dailynews.com THE WORLD’S FAVOURITE NEWSPAPER - Since 1879
Problems
• System went from 12,400 applications in 2013-14 to over 113,000 in 2014-15
• Over 50% are breaching legal time scales• Funding and resources• Involvement of family• Still being misused, and are still
misunderstood• Coroner’s inquests
The Consultation
Law Commission
• Commissioned by government to conduct a review and propose new DOLS legislation
• Consultation this summer on draft new DOLS system
• End of 2016 will publish a report and draft new bill (this has changed from 2017)
• This will then go back to parliament to (maybe) be enacted
The new system: ‘Protective care scheme’• Supportive care• Restrictive care and treatment• Separate system for hospitals and palliative
care
Supportive care: Criteria
• Those moving into (or already living in) – care home, supported living or shared lives accommodation
• Vulnerable people but not deprived of their liberty
• Lack capacity to decide where they will live
Supportive Care – Safeguards• Confirmation that all legal safeguards have
been followed (e.g. MCA, CA)• Oversight of tenancy arrangements –
confirmation in care plan• Care planning safeguards must be in place• Ongoing monitoring and review• Right to advocacy and an appropriate person
under the CA must be appointed
Restrictive care and treatmentThis is the direct replacement for DOLS – it aims to cover slightly more cases then just deprivation of liberty cases
Restrictive care and treatment: Criteria• The person is moving into (or already living in)
a care home, supported living or shared lives accommodation
• Restrictive care and treatment is being proposed
• Person lacks capacity to consent to the care and treatment
Restrictive care and treatment: Safeguards• An assessment takes place which is overseen by
an independent professional• Power to recommend conditions and make
recommendations• Care planning safeguards• Ongoing monitoring and review• Right to appeal and tribunal• Rights to CA advocacy and an ‘appropriate
person’ and RPR
The ‘Approved Mental Capacity Professional’ (AMCP)• Builds on BIA• All assessments referred to AMCP – note
though can delegate assessments• AMCP is responsible for ongoing oversight of
the restrictive care and treatment• Acting as an independent decision-maker on
behalf of the local authority• Regulated by the Health and Care Professional
Council and the Care Council for Wales
Deprivations of Liberty
• The care plan is the authority for the care provider to detain the person
• AMCP will need to ensure the objective medical expertise
Right to appeal
Proposals:•A tribunal system similar to the MHA•First tier tribunal – right of access•Then right of access to upper tribunal or CoP (consultation question)•Automatic reviews for restrictive care and practice cases when no referral has been made – time limits discussed in the consultation
Hospitals and Palliative careProposal of a bespoke system•May deprive someone of liberty for up to 28 days in a hospital based on the report of a registered medical practitioner•A responsible clinician must be appointed and a care plan produced•Further authorisations for a DOL would require agreement from a AMCP
Effect on advocacy
Proposals includes:•Replacing IMCAs with CA advocates and appropriate persons•Scrapping paid RPRs – still keeping unpaid ones
Will this work?
Other key issues:
• Legal supportive decision making scheme• Reforms of the BI checklist – prioritising the
person’s wishes and feelings• Deprivation of liberty at home
• Reform of coroner’s legislation – enabling more coroner’s discretion
• MHA interface• Advance decision-making and DOLS – ability
to consent to a future DOL• Governance and oversight by CQC, CSSIW and
HIW
Conclusions
• Are problems with the current system• BUT – does the proposed new system solve
these?• Consultation closes 2 November