View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Deployment Strategies for Differentiated Detection in Wireless Sensor NetworkJingbin Zhang, Ting Yan, and Sang H. Son
University of Virginia
From SECON 2006
Outline
Introduction Sensor Detection Model Problem Formulation Differentiated Deployment Algorithm Performance Evaluation Conclusion
Introduction
The efficiency of a sensor network depends on the deployment and coverage of the monitoring area.
In most previous studies on sensing coverage, a binary detection model is assumed. In a binary detection model, sensor node can
detect a target with a 100% probability if the target is within its sensing range.
Introduction
This paper considers a probabilistic detection model. With a probability detection model, a target is detected by
the sensor is probabilistic.
In many surveillance system, the system might require different degrees of security at different locations. For example, the system might require extremely high
detection probability at certain sensitive areas. However, for some not so sensitive areas, relatively low detection probabilities are required to reduce the number of sensors deployed.
Introduction
This paper aim at finding the minimal number of nodes to satisfy
that, after these nodes are deployed, for any location in the sensing field, the collective miss probability satisfies the predefined detection threshold distribution.
Related presentations:
(1) SMART A Scan-based Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Method
(2) On Multiple Point Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks
(3) Sensor Placement and Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Performance Analysis
Terrain Model
Sensor Field
U
V
D( x, y) : the number of nodes deployed at grid point (x, y).
Typically, D( x, y) is either 1 or 0.
(x, y)
Probability Detection Model
Without taking into consideration of the time duration [10][13].
Considering the time duration a target stays at a certain grid (x, y)
Collective Miss Probability
The collective miss probability distribution
where
Logarithmic collective miss probability distribution I( x, y) = ln M(x, y)
I( x, y) =
Problem Formulation
Let mth denote the miss probability threshold distribution of the whole field, in which mth( x, y) is the miss probability threshold at location ( x, y) .
Objective: Find the minimal number of nodes to satisfy that,
after these nodes are deployed, for any ( x, y) Grid, the collective miss probability M( x, y) is smaller than or equal to mth( x, y)
Linear Shift Invariant System (LSI)
Impulse response in this LSI system.
Matrix multiplication
Convolution
)0,(
.
.
.
)0,1(
.
.
)0,2(
)0,1(
)0,0(
),(),.....,0,(
.
.
.
),1(),.....,0,1(
.
.
),2(),.....,1,2(),0,2(
),1(),.....,1,1(),0,1(
),0(),.....,1,0(),0,0(
)0,(
.
.
.
)0,1(
.
.
)0,2(
)0,1(
)0,0(
2222
2
2
2
2
2 ND
ND
D
D
D
NNGNG
NNGNG
NGGG
NGGG
NGGG
NI
NI
I
I
I
Matrix multiplication
(0, 0)
(N, N)
Integer Linear Programming
Let mth denote the miss probability threshold distribution.
Set Ip = ln mth
Differentiated Deployment Algorithm
Based on matrix algebra, if we know the miss probability threshold distribution and the detection model,
Matrix multiplication
Differentiated Deployment Algorithm
The result Dp computed from Equation (9) can be any real number, including negative values. Therefore, the result Dp can not be used directly.
Idea: the maximum value in Dp might be the location that contributes t
he most in satisfying the detection requirement if a sensor is deployed at the location.
Conclusion
This paper focus on differentiated deployment problem, in which the required detection probability thresholds at different locations are different.
This paper shows that the relationship between the node deployment strategy and
the logarithmic collective miss probability distribution is Linear Shift Invariant (LSI).
A integer linear programming is formulated and a differentiated node deployment algorithm DIFF_DEPLOY is proposed.
MIN_MISS Algorithm
Candidate location: each location at which no sensor is deployed.
If we deploy a new node at candidate location ( x, y), the collective miss probability at location ( x, y) is