Departments Concerned Date: P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. Z- Planning · Highlands, and Flower Child Scottsdale. Their experience bothwith new developments as well ... enhanced landscaping,

PLEASE RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY TO JULIANNA PIERRE 2ND FLOOR, 602-262-4544

To: Departments Concerned Date: July 20, 2020 From: Alan Stephenson

Planning & Development Department Director Subject: P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. Z-242-81-6 (PHO-1-20) – Notice of Pending Actions by the

Planning Hearing Officer

1. Your attention is called to the fact that the Planning Hearing Officer willconsider the following case at a public hearing on August 19, 2020.

2. Information about this case is available for review at the Zoning Counter inthe Planning and Development Department on the 2nd Floor of Phoenix CityHall, telephone 602-262-7131, Option 6.

3. Staff, please indicate your comments and respond electronically [email protected] or you may provide hardcopies at the ZoningCounter in the Planning and Development Department on the second floorof Phoenix City Hall by July 27, 2020.

DISTRIBUTIONMayor’s Office (Lisa Fernandez), 11th Floor City Council (Penny Parrella), 11th Floor Aviation (Sheldon Daisley)CED (Michelle Pierson), 20th Floor Fire Prevention (Brent Allsopp), 2nd FloorLight Rail (Joel Carrasco/Special TOD Only) Neighborhood Services (Gregory Gonzales, Lisa Huggins), 4th Floor Parks & Recreation (Natasha Hughes), 16th Floor Public Transit (Kathryn Boris)Public Works (Ray Dovalina, Kristina Jensen, Elise Moore, Rudy Rangel, Roxanne Tapia), 5th FloorStreet Transportation Department (Maja Brkovic, Alan Hilty, Matthew Wilson), 5th FloorStreet Transportation - Ped. Safety Coordinator (Mailen Pankiewicz), 5th FloorWater Services (Don Reynolds, Victor Romo), 8th Floor Planning and Development (Alan Stephenson, Joshua Bednarek), 3rd Floor Planning and Development/Information Services (Ben Ernyei, Andrew Wickhorst), 4th Floor Planning and Development/Historic Preservation Office (Kevin Weight), 3rd Floor Planning Hearing Officer (Tricia Gomes, Adam Stranieri, Julianna Pierre), 2nd FloorVillage Planner (Sofia Mastikhina, Camelback East) Village Planning Committee Chair (Jay Swart, Camelback East)

200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor * Phoenix, Arizona 85003 * Tel: (602) 262-7131 * Fax: (602) 495-3793

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION

APPLICATION NO: PHO-1-20--Z-242-81-6

Council District: 6

Request For: Stipulation Modification

Reason for Request: Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding site plan approval. Modification of Stipulation 2 limiting height toone story. Owner Applicant RepresentativeLevine Investments Limited Partnership Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell LLC Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell LLC2801 East Camelback Road, Suite 450 6705 East Camelback Road, Suite 100 6705 East Camelback Road, Suite 100Phoenix AZ 85018 Scottsdale AZ 85251 Scottsdale AZ 85251(602) 248-8181 (480) 682-3902 P: (480) 682-3902 F: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Property Location: Northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue

Zoning Map: H-10 Quarter Section: 17-34 APN: 163-03-127C Acreage: 1.40

Village: Camelback East Last Hearing: CC HEARING

Previous Opposition: YesDate of Original City Council Action: 03/08/1982

Previous PHO Actions: Zoning Vested: C-O

Supplemental Map No.: 598Planning Staff: 076885

An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorizedsubstantive policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicablereview time frames, please call 602-262-7131 (option 6), email [email protected] or visit our website athttp://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html.

A Filing Fee had been paid to the City Treasurer to cover the cost of processing this application. The fee will be retained to coverthe cost whether or not the request is granted

Fee Fee Waived Fee Date Receipt Purpose$1,080.00 $0.00 07/02/2020 20-0057575 Original Filing Fee

Signature of Applicant: _____________________________________________________ DATE: ___________________

Hearing Results

Planning Hearing Officer Planning Commission City CouncilDate: 08/19/2020 1000 AM Date: Date:

Appealed?: Appealed?:Action: Action: Action:

[email protected] Dir: 480-682-3902

July 17, 2020

Via Hand-delivery, to: City of Phoenix Attn: Planning Hearing Officer 200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Re: Request to Modify Stipulations / SWC 32nd Street & Campbell Avenue

Dear Planning Hearing Officer:

The purpose of this correspondence is to seek modifications to the stipulations of two related zoning cases for a property located at the southwest corner of 32nd Street and Campbell Avenue (the “Site”). We represent Levine Investments Limited Partnership, who have recently acquired the Site and intend to make much-needed improvements to enhance the building design, overall circulation and ease of accessibility, which necessitate stipulation modifications to both zoning cases. The Site, which consists of parcels 163-03-127C; 127D; and -129, is located within the Camelback East Village and is shown in the aerial below.

Campbell Ave

32nd

St

6750 E. Camelback Rd., #100 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Office: 480-385-2727 www.berryriddell.com

BERRY RIDDELL LLC

July 17, 2020 Page 2

Levine Investments Limited Partnership

Levine Investments is a well-known real estate company based out of Phoenix that holds a diverse portfolio of iconic Sites throughout the Valley including Uptown Plaza, Buck & Rider, Scottsdale Highlands, and Flower Child Scottsdale. Their experience both with new developments as well as revitalization of aging properties makes them perfectly positioned to re-envision this Site.

Zoning History and Site Context

Although the three parcels function as one development, two related zoning cases apply to the Site. In 1981 an application was filed to rezone the entire Site from R1-6 to C-O. However, the application was amended before approval to include only the parcels outlined in blue below, to respond to input from the community.

The approval of Z-242-81 was subject to site plan approval, a one-story height limitation, and a 1-foot vehicular non-access easement on Turney Avenue. Below is the site plan for the

Z-220-83

Z-242-81

BERRY RIDDELL LLC


garden-style offices that were presented through this process, although this site currently only contains parking to support the existing office buildings.

In 1983 an application was approved to rezone the remainder of the Site, shown on the

previous page in green, from R1-6 to C-O for the development of the two-story offices shown below. This plan is generally consistent with what exists onsite today.

This plan was subject to a number of stipulations that were later modified through the Planning Hearing Officer process and now include a limitation on height to two stories and 32 feet, a west building setback of 125 feet, enhanced landscaping, a six-foot masonry wall along the western property line, and other requirements. In the mid-1980’s, the Site was developed with

BERRY RIDDELL LLC


office buildings in a layout that is generally consistent with the site plans showed through the two zoning cases. An aerial of the Site in 1986 is shown below.

However, by 1991 the office building on the southern two parcels, outlined above in red, was demolished and later replaced with parking to support the two-story medical office buildings. The current request will allow for a medical office building to be reconstructed on these parcels, but in a configuration that concentrates the building massing along 32nd Street and away from the single-family residences to the west, thereby screening the parking and creating a more compatible design. Additionally, the building façade and landscaping will be redesigned to reflect a more modern aesthetic, as shown below. The improvements described herein require some modifications to the existing stipulations, as outlined below. These requests will allow the Site to be redesigned with more efficient circulation, a modernized façade, and a layout that is compatible with the surrounding developments. Current Design Proposed Improvements

Stipulations

Z-242-81

1. Site plan approval. APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED XX/X/XXXX.

BERRY RIDDELL LLC


Rationale: This stipulation is outdated and this requested change will update it to typical language.

2. One story height limitation. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL BE LIMITED TO TWO STORIESAND 28 FEET.

Rationale: Unlike the previous design, which oriented the buildings close to the adjacent residences, this design concentrates the building massing closer to 32rd Street, where two stories in height is appropriate. All of the surrounding zoning districts permit development up to 30 feet in height. This request represents a better design than what was previously approved and is an appropriate transition from the existing two-story medical office buildings on Site to the adjacent residential developments in the vicinity, which vary from one to two stories.

Z-220-83

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan dated March 16, 1984, asmodified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum building setback of 30 feet shall be required along the north property line adjacentto Campbell Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Buildings shall be a maximum of two stories or thirty-two feet.

4. There shall be no building constructed within 125 feet of the west property line as measured from31st Place.

5. A 6-foot block wall of masonry stucco shall be placed along the entire west property line.

6. Landscaping shall be placed on the west side of the above-described six-foot wall along thefront of Lots 16, 17, 57, 58, 59 and the former Roma Avenue.

7. Landscaping will be provided on the east side of the above-described wall for its entire length.

8. The wall will be constructed, stuccoed, painted, and landscaped prior to demolition, orcommencement of construction on site.

9. All parking by construction personnel will be on the property.

10. Ingress and egress will be limited to 32nd Street, and applicant will donate nonvehicular accesseasements on the north and west property lines.

Rationale: Currently, the only egress from the Site is along 32nd Street and visitors must cross two lanes of an arterial street not protected by a turn signal. The requested access will allow visitors to make a right turn out of the Site onto Campbell Ave and then turn onto 32nd Street at a traffic signal. This condition is safer for the community and for the primarily elderly population that visits the Site. The primary entrance will continue to be the Roma Avenue alignment, and access onto Turney Avenue is prohibited.

3. 1' vehicular non-access easement on Turney.

Rights-of-WaySufficeint right-of-way to be dedicated by the property owner within one year of the final City Council action to provide for the following: 1. A 20' alley on the north side of the property.

BERRY RIDDELL LLC


11. All utilities will be underground.

12. All light standards will be a maximum of 15 feet and lights turned away from adjacentresidential districts.

13. All landscaping will be installed and maintained with appropriate water systems, as approvedby the City of Phoenix Engineer and Landscape Architect.

14. The site will be subject to site plan approval under C-O zoning, as required by the City ofPhoenix.

Right-of-way

15. Sufficient right-of-way to be dedicated by the property owner within one year of final CityCouncil action to provide for a 15’ x 15’ triangle off Lot No. 17.

16. The rezoning change will not become effective until the right-of-way dedications have beenmade, if necessary, and a Supplemental Zoning Map has been adopted.

We respectfully request your approval of the stipulation modifications outlined herein. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

Very truly yours,

Wendy Riddell

Current access

Desired additional access

Primary access

r.11 '{ Or f'I !OF1\llX CJI y cu:11K I JIJ'f\l!TMl:NT

i· ;·11. c11 30, 1982

i·i r:. ,J<.l!n,:!s l·'ioyr~r

r:s1 v.i.rc)11!11~11f:11.l Cc)nut tl.1c:l:ic11 Co. 32'10 r:. CJm~lb:ick i;,~"d

Pl1r.:r:ni.x, AZ G5(';.l.8

'Il1e Pho:>n.i.x City Council, at its neeting held H3rch 8, 1982, o::in::;irlen~d hpp.l i.caU.on 2'12-8.l (O)ntinued from Febru.:iry 8, .1.982; appealed Ly ;:ipp.lie<3nt) - Hequest of T:iw.i.ronm:!ntal Con:;truct.i.cn O:i., on J:d1alf of M. \Tera Gro.·.1n, to 1:-ezonc t11e nort:ly,.;cst corner C>f 32t1d Sl:rcet ;Jnd 'illl. nc~y lw•:!nue (approx.i.m'ltcly ):;4(acres) fn)ln Rl.-6 to C-0.

I . '{I 1he City Council granted this rezoning, subject to tl1e foll c.wing:

l . ~_; i l:e i)J .:in .: l)l)rovrl 1 2. 01c-sl:ory 11e.i.ght l.i.mit:at.i.on 3. l' vc11ic.iJ.1,:]r nct1-.:lcccss Cl)sE1rent ai. 'Il.1i.11ey.

G11 f:fi.cicnt i-i.ght--0f-way to 1:e dedicated by the property CM'!1er within one year of the f.i.nal City Q)l1!1cil action to provide for the follo.v:i.ng:

1. !\ 20' alley en the north side of tl1e pi:cperty.

'111<' rezoning ch;:mge will not l:.ecane effective until the right-of--w.-,y 1·\~t::.i r:atia1s 11;:ive l:ieen 1n:i.c1e, if necessary, arid a Sur•plcrrcntary Zoping f.'.ap l~d s l~ce n ;i.dcfJted .

l f ~/<Jll l."C"<-1l1ire furt:11er assistunce or infornatiai, p1,.1.ning Dor.:irtment, located on the sixth fl=r 1;11i ld.i.ng, 251 West \'iashingtm, or call 262-7131.

l:C/ }>n/0203C

cc: rlar:ning [,~p.Jrtrrent (2) !.'!·.c_:ir.ecring [1?p3t·trrcnt 'fr/: ffic Fl19i nee ring c'~r~ .. JrtJ<(~nt

• PHOEUIX, ,\f\IZON/, 85003

i)J.ease contact t l1e of the Munic.i.p3 l

• TELE PHO: !E (602) 2G~ G311 - -------- ·-----·--·- --·-·-- -----------

.I

076885

Highlight

076885

Highlight

N 32

ND ST

N31

STPL

E MONTECITO AVE

N 32

ND PL

E TURNEY AVE

E ROMA AVE

ALLEY

Maricopa County Assessor's Office

Planning & Development Department

PHO-1-20--Z-242-81-6 Property Location: Northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue

0 100 20050 Feet ´

N 32

ND ST

N31

STPL

E MONTECITO AVE

N 32

ND PL

E TURNEY AVE

E ROMA AVE

ALLEY

R-5

R1-6*

R1-6

R1-6

R-O*

R1-6

C-O*

C-O*

Maricopa County Assessor's Office

Planning & Development Department

PHO-1-20--Z-242-81-6 Property Location: Northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue

0 100 20050 Feet ´

STAMP

KIVA : 20-1112 SDEV: 2007673PAPP: 2009724QS: 17-34ABND: PRIM: LSPL:

E CAMPBELL AVE.

E INDIAN SCHOOL RD.

N 2

4TH

ST.

N 3

2ND

ST

N 4

0TH

ST.

E CAMELBACK RD.

E TURNEY AVEE ROMA AVE

SITE

EXISTING 2 STORY MEDICAL BUILDING (1)

• 1 SPACE PER 200 S.F. = 95 SPACES REQUIRED• ADA SPACES REQUIRED = 4• ADA SPACES PROVIDED = 5

EXISTING 2 STORY MEDICAL BUILDING (2)


NEW 2 STORY BUILDING


TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 215SPACES PROVIDED:

EXISTING = 222NEW = 170

TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED = 392

PARKING REQUIREMENTS

THERE ARE NO LOT SALES ASSOCIATEDWITH PARCELS 1,2 OR 3

GENERAL NOTES

1. DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THIS SITE WILLCONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES ANDORDINANCES

2. ALL NEW OR RELOCATED UTILITIES WILL BEPLACED UNDERGROUND.

3. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN ATRIANGLE MEASURED BACK 10’ FROM THEPROPERTY LINE AND 20’ ALONG THE PROPERTYLINE ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAYSENTRANCES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUMHEIGHT OF 3’.

4. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN ATRIANGLE MEASURING 33’ X 33’ ALONG THEPROPERTY LINES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT AMAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3’.

5. ANY LIGHTING WILL BE PLACED SO AS TODIRECT LIGHT AWAY FROM ADJACENTRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND WILL NOT EXCEEDONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. NONOISE, ODOR, OR VIBRATION WILL BE EMITTEDAT ANY LEVEL EXCEEDING THE GENERAL LEVELOF NOISE, ODOR, OR VIBRATION EMITTED BYUSES IN THE AREA OUTSIDE OF THE SITE.

6. OWNERS OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO PUBLICRIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITYFOR MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING LOCATEDWITHIN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, IN ACCORDANCEWITH APPROVED PLANS.

7. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND SATELLITEDISHES SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OFTHE TALLEST EQUIPMENT.

8. ALL SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED TOCONCEAL TRASH CONTAINERS, LOADINGDOCKS, TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOWPREVENTERS AND OTHER MECHANICAL ORELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FROM EYE LEVELADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS.

9. BARBED, RAZOR, OR CONCERTINA WIRE (ORSIMILAR) SHALL NOT BE USED ON THIS SITEWHERE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS ORADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

10. ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE REVIEWS,APPROVALS, AND PERMITS. NO SIGNS AREAPPROVED PER THIS PLAN.

11. ALLEY SHALL NOT BE USED FOR EMERGENCYFIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS.

12. AN EMERGENCY ACCESS PERMIT SHALL BEREQUIRED AND SHALL BE A SEPARATESUBMITTAL. SEPARATE F481 EMERGENCYACCESS PERMIT REQUIRED PRIOR TOCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. THIS PERMITINCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ITEMS SUCHAS FIRE LINES, ADDRESS LOCATION, AND LOCKBOX LOCATION. AN APPROVED SITE PLAN ISREQUIRED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS PERMIT

I CONSENT TO THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS SITE PLAN PROVIDED THAT IF MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE, THE PROFESSIONALS WHO MAKE SUCH CHANGES ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR THE MODIFIED PORTIONS OF THE PLAN.

__________________________________________________

CP DREWETT, RA10-17-2019

SITE PLAN NOTES

BUILDING HEIGHT:MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: 56'-0"

PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING HEIGHT: 30'-6"PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE HEIGHTH: 15'-0"

SETBACKS:FRONT - 20'-0" (WEST)

SIDE - 5'-0" (NORTH & SOUTH)REAR - 15'-0" (EAST)

PARKING:REQUIRED: 1 SPACE / 200 S.F. NET FLOOR AREA

18,912 + 18,912 + 5,000 = 42,824 S.F. NET FLOOR AREA42,824 S.F./200 S.F. = 214 PARKING SPACES REQ'D

PARKING PROVIDED:EXISTING = 222 SPACES

NEW = 170 SPACESTOTAL = 392 SPAES

ACESSABLE PARKING REQUIRED = 9 SPACESPROVIDED = 10 SPACES

C-O ZONING REQUIREMENTS

- EXISTING BUILDING -1 FOOTPRINT = 20,385.9 S.F.- EXISTING BUILDING -2 FOOTPRINT = 20,385.9 S.F.-PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 3,090 S.F.-PROPOSED NEW PARKING GARAGE FOOTPRINT = 30,116.5 S.F.

TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT ------------------------------ 73,978.8 S.F.

- EXISTING BUILDING -1 OVERHANG = 1,544.8 S.F.- EXISTING BUILDING -2 OVERHANG = 1,544.8 S.F- PROPOSED NEW BUILDING OVERHANG = 816 S.F.-PROPOSED NEW PARKING GARGE OVERHANG = 242 S.F.

TOTAL BUILDING OVERHANG --------------------------------- 4,147.6 S.F.

EXISTING COVERED PARKING -------------------------------14,297.9 S.F.

TOTAL LOT BUILDING COVERAGE PROVIDED73,978.8 + 4,147.6 + 14,297.9 = 92,424.3 S.F.

92,424.3 S.F. / 245,593 S.F. = 38 % < 50%

LOT COVERAGE:PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: ----- S.F.

NET AREA: 245,593 S.F.MAX LOT COVERAGE FROM NET AREA ALLOWABLE 50%

(122,796.5 S.F.)

Z-242-81 REZONED APNs 163-03-127D AND 163-03-127CZ-220-83 REZONED APN 163-03-129

ZONNING INFORMATION

PARCEL NO. 1:

THE EAST 380 FEET OF THE NORTH 131.50 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF; AND ALSO

EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN DOCKET 11543, PAGE 166,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 40 FEET OF SAID SOUTH HALF WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 131.50 FEET THEREOF;

THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 5 FEET;THENCE NORTHEAST TO A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE WHICH IS 5 FEET

NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL NO. 2:

LOT 1, 32ND STREET AND CAMPBELL AVENUE REPLAT, RECORDED IN BOOK 281 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION

N. 32ND STREET

E. C

AM

PB

EL

L A

VE

.

E. T

UR

NE

Y A

VE

.

PROPOSED NEW2 STORY

OFFICE BUILDING5,000 SQ. FTHEIGHT = 26'F.F. - T.B.D.

EXISTING2 STORY MEDICAL

BUILDINGTO REMAIN (1)18,912 SQ. FT

HEIGHT = 30'-6"

EXISTING2 STORY MEDICAL

BUILDINGTO REMAIN (2)18,912 SQ. FT

HEIGHT = 30'-6"

PROPOSED NEW2 LEVEL PODIUM PARKING GARAGE

170 SPACES60,906 SQ.FT.HEIGHT = 15'

EXISTING COVEREDPARKING TO REMAIN


EXISTINGDRIVEWAY EXISTING

DRIVEWAY

PROPOSEDDRIVEWAY

N. 31ST PLACE

EXISTING PARKINGTO REMAIN



EXISTING COVERED & UNCOVEREDPARKING TO DEMOLISH

100 SPACES



20' -

0"

20' -

0"

FRONT YARD SETBACK

5' - 0"

SID

E YA

RD

ETB

ACK

15 ' - 0"

15' -

0"

15' -

0"

15' -

0"

GARAGEGROUND LEVELENTRANCE

GARAGESECOND LEVEL

RAMP

PROPERTY LINE

REAR YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE

REAR YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE EXISTING TRASH

ENCLOSURE

PROPOSED NEW PLANTERS

ENTRANCE ENTRANCE

PROPOSED NEW PLANTER

PARCEL NO. 3

PARCEL NO. 1

PARCEL NO. 2ADDRESS: 4413 N. 31ST PL.

PHOENIX AZ. 85016APN: 168-03-129

SITE AREA: 200,900 SQ.FT. (4.61 ACRE)ZONING: C-O

ADDRESS: 4348 N. 32ND ST.PHOENIX AZ. 85018APN: 163-03-127D


ADDRESS:3120 E. TURNEY AVE.PHOENIX AZ. 85016APN: 163-03-127C


PROPOSED NEW

PLANTER

SVT

0' 20' 40' 80'

ROOFOVERHANG

ROOFOVERHANG

PROPOSED PLANTERS

FRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE

SID

E YA

RD

ETB

ACK

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

5' - 0"

25'-2"

30'-0"

25'-2"

30'-5"

29'-3"

25'-2"

30'-0"

25'-2"

25'-2"

30'-0"

25'-2"

30'-5"

29'-3"

25'-2"

30'-0"

25'-2"

12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0"

25'-2"

25'-3"

25'-3"

26'-1"

11'-0"

14'-2"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

PROPERTY LINE

DREWETT WORKS // ARCHITECTURE

7 1 4 4 E. S T E T S O N D R . , S U I T E 2 0 4

FOR

DATE

S C O T T S D A L E , A Z 8 5 2 5 1

P 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8 // F 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8

P L A N S @ D R E W E T T W O R K S . C O M

OWNER

ARCHITECT

DREWETT WORKS7144 E STETSON DR. SUITE 204

SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251PPHONE: (855) 373-9388

ZONING

APN

NET SITE AREA

REV

TH

E C

EN

TR

E-4

400

& 4

444

N 3

2ND

ST

RE

ET

20-xx

PRE-APPLICATION SUBMITTAL

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

DR201

LEVINE INVESTMENTS L.P.2801 E. CAMELBACK RD. SUITE 450

PHOENIX, AZ 85016PHONE: (602) 248-8181

EMAIL: [email protected]

C-O

PARCEL 1: 163-03-129; PARCEL 2: 163-03-127D;PARCEL 3: 163-03-127C

PARCEL 1: 200,900 SQ. FT. = 4.61 ACREPARCEL 2: 34,195 SQ. FT. = 0.79 ACREPARCEL 3: 10,498 SQ. FT. = 0.24 ACRE

TOTAL: 245,593 SQ. FT. = 5.64 ACRE

07-01-2020

07-01-2020

N O

R T

H VICINITY MAP

N O

R T

H

1" = 40'-0"

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

PHO-1-20--Z-242-81-6 Proposed Site Plan Hearing Date: August 19, 2020

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5

T.O. PARAPET WALL (HIGH)+30

MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

14' -

2" 23

' - 9

"

25' -

3"

26' -

1"

2' - 0"

20' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

NT

SETB

ACK

15' - 0" 1' - 4"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

REA

R S

ETBA

CK

N. 32ND STREET

E. C

AM

PB

EL

L A

VE

.

E. T

UR

NE

Y A

VE

. N. 31ST PLACE

DR202 3

DR202

1

DR202

2

DR2024

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

25' -

3"

26' -

1"

21' -

6"

23' -

9"

5' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

9' -

1"

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

14' -

2"

21' -

6"

5' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SED

E SE

TBAC

K

9' -

1"

25' -

3"

26' -

1 3

/8"

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

14' -

2"

21' -

6"

12' -

1"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

REA

R S

ETBA

CK

1' - 4"15' - 0"20' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

NT

SETB

ACK

2' - 0"

25' -

3"

STUCCO (LIGHT BROWN)ESR #1607

MATERIAL LEGEND

STUCCO (BROWN)ESR #1607

STUCCO (WHITE)ESR #1607

STONE VENEER

EXPOSED CONCRETE

PERFORATED METAL(50% TRANSPARENT)

METAL FINISH (FASCIA)



FOR

DATE

S C O T T S D A L E , A Z 8 5 2 5 1

P 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8 // F 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8


REV

TH

E C

EN

TR

E-4

400

& 4

444

N 3

2ND

ST

RE

ET

20-xx


ELEVATIONS

DR202

06-17-2020

06-17-2020

1/16" = 1'-0"

PARKING GARAGE SOUTH ELEVATION3

1/16" = 1'-0"

PARKING GARAGE EAST ELEVATION1

1/16" = 1'-0"

PARKING GARAGE WEST ELEVATION2

1/16" = 1'-0"

PARKING GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION4

PHO-1-20--Z-242-81-6 Proposed Elevations Hearing Date: August 19, 2020

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

22' -

2"

30' -

0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

NT

SETB

ACK

20' - 0"

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

22' -

2"

30' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

26' -

0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

NT

SETB

ACK

20' - 0"

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

30' -

0"

26' -

0"

30' -

5"

22' -

2"

DR203 DR20334

N. 32ND STREET

E. C

AM

PB

EL

L A

VE

.

E. T

UR

NE

Y A

VE

. N. 31ST PLACE

DR203

1

DR203

2

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"


MATERIAL LEGEND



STONE VENEER

EXPOSED CONCRETE





FOR

DATE

S C O T T S D A L E , A Z 8 5 2 5 1

P 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8 // F 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8


REV

TH

E C

EN

TR

E-4

400

& 4

444

N 3

2ND

ST

RE

ET

20-xx


ELEVATIONS

DR203

06-17-2020

06-17-2020

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4400 NORTH ELEVATION3

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4400 SOUTH ELEVATION4

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4400 EAST ELEVATION1

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4400 WEST ELEVATION2


LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

22' -

2"

30' -

0"

20' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

N S

ETBA

CK

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

25' - 1"5' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

SID

E SE

TBAC

K

28' - 1" 5' - 0"

22' -

2"

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

DR204

1

DR204

2

DR2044

N. 32ND STREET

E. C

AM

PB

EL

L A

VE

.

E. T

UR

NE

Y A

VE

.

N. 31ST PLACE

DR204 3

LEVEL 01+0

LEVEL 02+12.5


MAXIMUM HEIGHT+56

22' -

2"

30' -

0"

26' -

0"

30' -

0"

30' -

5"

20' - 0"

PRO

PER

TY L

INE

FRO

NT

SETB

ACK


MATERIAL LEGEND



STONE VENEER

EXPOSED CONCRETE





FOR

DATE

S C O T T S D A L E , A Z 8 5 2 5 1

P 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8 // F 8 5 5 - 3 7 3 - 9 3 8 8


REV

TH

E C

EN

TR

E-4

400

& 4

444

N 3

2ND

ST

RE

ET

20-xx


ELEVATIONS

DR204

06-17-2020

06-17-2020

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4444 NORTH ELEVATION4

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4444 WEST ELEVATION2

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4444 EAST ELEVATION1

1/16" = 1'-0"

BUILDING # 4444 SOUTH ELEVATION3


City Council Minutes

( ..

••

ZONING CASES SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO.

Application 242-81 - Continued from February 8, 1982 -Appealed by applicant Request of Environmental Construction Co., on behalf of M. Vera Brown, to rezone the northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue (approximately 6.41 acres) from Rl-6 to C-0.

The Planning Commission recommended, 3-2 · vote, that the application be denied.

This application required three-fourths vote by City Council to effect approval.

.'

/

076885

Highlight

076885

Highlight

City Council Minutes

El>JVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION co.

Application No. 242-81 - i\ppealed by Applicant -Request of Environmental Construction Co., on behalf of M. Vera Brown, to rezone the northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue (approximately 6-41 acres) from Rl-6 to C-0 ..

The Planning Commission recommended, 3-2 vote, that the application be denied.

This application required three-fourths vote by City Council to effect approval.

Mr. Counts said the Planning Commission, by a 3-2 vote, recommended denial because of residential impact, staff also recommended denial because similar requests would be encouraged along 32nd Street, additional employment opportunities should be located in the core area, and remaining residential properties would be adversely affected by commercial traffic generated. He said the Law Department advised that a three-quarter vote would not be required as lots had been reduced.

Mr. c. Michael Pierce, 2333 N. Central, stated his clients had put together 14 parcels, 12 of which were in Valencia Estates and, at the t·ime of the Planning Commis·~ion hearing, they thought they had the necessary 31 signatures required to change the deed restrictions, but as only 20 had been secured, they withdrew those 12 parcels which left only t.he parcel fronting on 32nd Street and Turney; in terms of acreage, dropping five of the 6.41 acres leaving slightly more than one acre on that ~pplication.

076885

Highlight

Planning Commission Minutes

. '· .. .. January 13, 1982

Application Applicant: Subject:

No. 242-81 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1981) ·Environmental Construction Co. (owner: M. Vera Brown) To rezone the northwest corner of 32nd Street and Turney Avenue (approximately 6.41 acres) from Rl-6 to C-0.

Mr. Clark disqualified himself from the deliberations of this case and passed the chair to Vice Chairman Haarer.

Mr. Forde read the staff recommendation which was for denial. The purpose of this request is to allow commercial office use at this location. The granting of this application would sacrifice 14 residences and further threaten the remainder of the neighborhood. They are contemplating abandoning the street that is now ingress and egress to the local neighborhood. Staff feels that any additional basic employment for the village should be in the core. If this request is granted, staff feels that it is of the substance that many more similar requests along 32nd Street will be initiated.

There was opposition present; approximately 20 people stood.

Mr. c. Michael Pierce, 2333 North Central, spoke representing this application. He stated that copies of the rendering, site plan, and elevations of the projec.t were forwarded to the Conunission earlier. His client, Environment Developers, have been able to accumulate 14 different owned properties on this site. He knows that the Commission is aware and that they have had to consider the problems of older houses on busy streets.

Mr. Pierce stated that 32nd Street has had the most dramatic increase in traffic of any street in the City of Phoenix in the last two years. It has ~0ne from 10,000 cars per day to 23,000 cars per day in a year and a half. That resulted from the opening up of 32nd Street to Lincoln.

Thirty-second Street is one of the major accesses to the north and eastern portion of the City. The houses were built fronting on the street several years ago; three still back or drive directly onto the street for ingress/ egress. The lifestyle of these people has changed simply because of the noise and danger they face. Thirty-second street is no longer a viable choice to live on if one could choose.

The houses were built on 32nd Street when it was not a City road, but a rural road; it is now a major arterial. What normally happens throughout the City, is for a lot to get a real estate license or dental permit or others and then you have the problem of parking, landscaping, and several other problems.

Mr. Pierce stated that his clients have gone to the time of year and the expense to put together 14 contiguous properties. This particular location should set a tone for how things can be handled in the future. They will not be piecemeal. He believes that they have a compatible site plan. He stated that what has been worked out and what can be done on amassing parcels of this type is shown on the site plan presented. The project will be one and two story units; they are shake roof; they are stucco; they are wood siding in accordance with the residential neighborhood. They are set back

from Campbell approximately 30 feet and the landscaping is a minimum of 30 feet.

076885

Highlight





January 13, 1982

Ms. Hatfield made the MOTIONthatApplication No. 242-81 be forwarded to the City Counc~l with a recommendation for denial. She stated that she agreed with Mr. Bookbinder's reasons.

Mr. Bookbinder SECONDED the motion.

Mr. Osborn stated that he believed a lot of what the applicant had said, but there is always a problem with houses on busy streets and you hope that somehow they can get assembled. To him, this is a very tough case. The project will go back into the interior of the neighborhood where the people will have to look at the back of office buildings. He believes the damage to the neighbors outweighs the benefit to be gained by letting the application be aggregated. He does support the motion.

Mr. Haarer stated that he sees both sides of the situation; however, he has one apprehension. He thinks that all of the Commissioners know what happens along major thoroughfares. It is a very substantial neighborhood, but 32nd Street has become a major thoroughfare and it is not comfortable to live there. The general trend· is that those lots go one by one because people decide they no longer-want to·back a car out on 32nd Street. They sell to an investor and leave. It then becomes a rental property that has the tendency to deteriorate and become a hodge-podge development. Sooner or later there has to be a decision made in this particular area. Probably there will never be an opportunity to do a one time amassing of property as seen here; therefore, he thinks the application has merit.

There being no further discussion, Vice Chairman Haarer called for a vote, ROLL CALL: Ms. Hatfield, yes; Mr. Bookbinder, yes; Mr. Chasse, no; Mr. Osborn, yes; Mr. Haarer, no. The MOTION PASSED three to two with Mr. Chasse and Mr. Haarer in opposition.

* * * *

52

076885

Highlight

076885

Highlight

Planning Commission Minutes •• September 30, 1981

Application No.: Applicant:

Subject:

.. 242-81 Environmental Construction Co., (owner: M. Vera

Brown) To rezone the northwest corner of 32nd Street and TUrney Avenue {approximately 1.57 acres) from Rl-6 to C-0.

Jim Moyer, Vice President of the Environmental Construction Company, 3240 East Camelback Road, requested a continuance for the purposes of acqu1r1ng more land, finalizing plans for development, and working with neighbors in opposition.

Clark stepped down at this time.

Robert w. Smith, 4409 N. 31st Place, an adjacent property owner on the north and west, spoke in opposition to the continuance. He stated that deed restrictions prevented changing the zoning without the majority vote of the property owners in the subdivision.

Chairman Ervanian told Mr. Smith that the merits of the case were not being discussed at this time, only the continuance.

Mr. Smith said he opposed the continuance because 44 of 61 owners in the subdivision have signed a petition in opposition.

Mr. Haarer made a MOTION that Application No. 242-81 be continued to the agenda of January 13, 1982, subject to a continuance fee.

Mr. Chasse SECONDED the motion.

There being no further discussion, Chairman Er'fanian called for a vote and the MOTION PASSED six to zero.

Mr. Clark returned to the voting body at this time.

********

076885

Highlight

076885

Highlight

076885

Highlight

Documents

Departments Concerned Date: P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. Z- Planning · Highlands, and Flower Child Scottsdale. Their experience bothwith new developments as well ... enhanced landscaping,