DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY...Military Personnel - PCS 0 4,728 6,406 318 177 0 0 11,629 HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 332 9,100 19,400 46,242 2,315 556 0 77,945 TOTAL COSTS 67,800 353,000 658,627

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

FY 2003

BIENNIAL BUDGET ESTIMATES (BRAC 88, 91, 93, 95)

BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT, I, II, III, IV JUSTIFICATION DATA SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS

FEBRUARY 2002

- 1-

BASE CLOSURE I BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (1988 COMMISSION)

FINANCIAL SUMMARY ($000)

Closure/Realignment Location: Overall Financial Summary 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 76,500 65,242 14,315 36,350 0 0 192,407 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 1,287 13,587 33,801 0 0 48,675

Studies 0 0 0 731 0 0 731 Compliance 0 1,287 0 18,837 0 0 20,124

Restoration 0 0 13,587 14,233 0 0 27,820 Operations & Maintenance 2,108 2,497 8,218 25,900 0 0 38,723 Military Personnel - PCS 315 0 0 100 0 0 415

Other 1,727 1,439 230 0 0 0 3,396 HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 80,650 70,465 36,350 95,151 0 0 283,616 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 80,650 70,465 36,350 95,151 0 0 283,616

Savings Military Construction -7,600 0 -38,900 0 0 0 -46,500

Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 -26,000 -38,000 -22,700 -32,600 -32,200 -151,500 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 -4,000 -9,700 -6,100 -19,800

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 135 185

Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 250 360 510

TOTAL SAVINGS -7,600 -26,000 -76,900 -26,700 -42,300 -38,300 -217,800

Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 68,900 65,242 -24,585 36,350 0 0 145,907

Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental 0 1,287 13,587 33,801 0 0 48,675 Studies 0 0 0 731 0 0 731

Compliance 0 1,287 0 18,837 0 0 20,124 Restoration 0 0 13,587 14,233 0 0 27,820 Operations & Maintenance 2,108 -23,503 -29,782 3,200 -32,600 -32,200 -112,777

Military Personnel - PCS 315 0 0 -3,900 -9,700 -6,100 -19,385 Other 1,727 1,439 230 0 0 0 3,396

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 135 185

Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 250 360 510

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 73,050 44,465 -40,550 69,451 -42,300 -38,300 65,816

- 2-

BASE CLOSURE II BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (1991 COMMISSION)


Closure/Realignment Location: Overall Financial Summary 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 19,534 150,174 271,087 35,214 88,546 0 0 564,555 Family Housing 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 500

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 500 Environmental 47,694 96,328 150,841 95,320 82,942 51,532 50,875 575,532

Studies 1,875 10,649 14,837 500 1,146 2,894 1,014 32,915 Compliance 10,858 22,913 74,224 34,810 32,347 8,691 7,380 192,223

Restoration 34,961 62,766 60,780 60,010 49,449 39,947 42,481 350,394 Operations & Maintenance 240 91,170 210,893 144,092 233,683 37,599 11,068 728,745 Military Personnel - PCS 0 4,728 6,406 318 177 0 0 11,629

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 332 9,100 19,400 46,242 2,315 556 0 77,945

TOTAL COSTS 67,800 353,000 658,627 321,186 407,663 89,687 61,943 1,958,906 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 -1,328 -1,393 -349 -3,070

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 67,800 353,000 658,627 321,186 406,335 88,294 61,595 1,955,836

One-time Implementation Costs (Funded by Other Appropriations) Military Construction 5,943 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,943

Family Housing 829 0 0 0 0 0 0 829 Operations & Maintenance 25,605 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,605

Military Personnel - PCS 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 240 Other 8,083 4,930 0 0 0 0 0 12,986

TOTAL COSTS 40,700 4,930 0 0 0 0 0 45,603

Savings Military Construction -13,870 0 -13,619 -6,297 -3,750 0 0 -37,536

Family Housing -51,894 -1,768 -1,618 -4,522 -9,387 -8,201 -8,201 -85,591 Construction -51,128 0 0 0 0 0 0 -51,128

Operations -766 -1,768 -1,618 -4,522 -9,387 -8,201 -8,201 -34,463 Operations & Maintenance -12,661 -18,343 -136,037 -233,832 -301,438 -305,557 -305,557 -1,313,425 Military Personnel - PCS -1,623 -18,530 -49,963 -81,890 -123,232 -151,983 -151,983 -579,204

Other -19,259 -97,719 -100,758 -163,944 -199,893 -183,251 -183,251 -948,075 Civilian ES (End Strength) -1,321 -2,583 -3,593 -4,287 -4,328 -3,822 -3,822 -23,756

Military ES (End Strength) -87 -1,048 -1,876 -2,582 -3,719 -4,088 -4,088 -17,488

TOTAL SAVINGS -99,307 -136,360 -301,995 -490,485 -637,700 -648,992 -648,992 -2,963,831

Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 11,607 150,174 257,468 28,917 84,796 0 0 532,962

Family Housing -51,065 -1,268 -1,618 -4,522 -9,387 -8,201 -8,201 -84,262 Construction -51,128 0 0 0 0 0 0 -51,128 Operations 63 -1,268 -1,618 -4,522 -9,387 -8,201 -8,201 -33,134

Environmental 47,694 96,328 150,841 95,320 82,942 51,532 50,875 575,532 Studies 1,875 10,649 14,837 500 1,146 2,894 1,014 32,915

Compliance 10,858 22,913 74,224 34,810 32,347 8,691 7,380 192,223 Restoration 34,961 62,766 60,780 60,010 49,449 39,947 42,481 350,394 Operations & Maintenance 13,184 72,827 74,856 -89,740 -67,755 -267,958 -294,489 -559,075

Military Personnel - PCS -1,383 -13,802 -43,557 -81,572 -123,055 -151,983 -151,983 -567,335 HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other -10,844 -83,716 -81,358 -117,702 -197,578 -182,695 -183,251 -857,144 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 -1,328 -1,393 -349 -3,070 Civilian ES (End Strength) -1,321 -2,583 -3,593 -4,287 -4,328 -3,822 -3,822 -23,756

Military ES (End Strength) -87 -1,048 -1,876 -2,582 -3,719 -4,088 -4,088 -17,488

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 9,193 220,543 356,632 -169,299 -231,365 -560,698 -587,398 -982,392

- 3-

BASE CLOSURE III BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (1993 COMMISSION)


Closure/Realignment Location: Overall Financial Summary 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 273,933 532,611 738,264 216,969 130,445 18,800 1,911,022 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 158,528 207,293 146,033 216,809 196,227 152,904 1,077,794

Studies 2,897 4,046 3,352 1,092 4,239 830 16,456 Compliance 57,211 126,397 86,979 99,978 59,792 47,448 477,805

Restoration 98,420 76,850 55,702 115,739 132,196 104,626 583,533 Operations & Maintenance 307,415 660,071 611,831 222,422 150,270 71,614 2,023,623 Military Personnel - PCS 11,984 21,000 11,703 16,616 9,472 17,734 88,509

Other 32,604 18,121 6,499 4,267 0 0 61,491 HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 784,464 1,439,096 1,514,330 677,083 486,414 261,052 5,162,439 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 -2,578 0 0 -51 0 -2,629

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 784,464 1,436,518 1,514,330 677,083 486,363 261,052 5,159,810

Savings Military Construction -38,860 -29,580 -75,044 -39,052 -13,948 -20,602 -217,086

Family Housing -8,117 -7,633 -27,064 -29,814 -49,609 -86,086 -208,323 Construction -7,360 0 -11,600 0 0 -37,100 -56,060

Operations -757 -7,633 -15,464 -29,814 -49,609 -48,986 -152,263 Operations & Maintenance -46,872 -94,515 -360,911 -539,596 -677,959 -731,553 -2,451,406 Military Personnel - PCS -6,485 -55,706 -96,796 -190,882 -281,139 -315,852 -946,860

Other -2,941 -15,114 -120,198 -186,012 -201,716 -205,741 -731,722 Civilian ES (End Strength) -9,203 -18,983 -23,123 -22,250 -23,254 -23,254 -120,067

Military ES (End Strength) -1,936 -4,873 -7,757 -8,241 -8,261 -8,261 -39,329

TOTAL SAVINGS -103,275 -202,548 -680,013 -985,356 -1,224,371 -1,359,834 -4,555,397

Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 235,073 503,031 663,220 177,917 116,497 -1,802 1,693,936

Family Housing -8,117 -7,633 -27,064 -29,814 -49,609 -86,086 -208,323 Construction -7,360 0 -11,600 0 0 -37,100 -56,060 Operations -757 -7,633 -15,464 -29,814 -49,609 -48,986 -152,263

Environmental 158,528 207,293 146,033 216,809 196,227 152,904 1,077,794 Studies 2,897 4,046 3,352 1,092 4,239 830 16,456

Compliance 57,211 126,397 86,979 99,978 59,792 47,448 477,805 Restoration 98,420 76,850 55,702 115,739 132,196 104,626 583,533 Operations & Maintenance 260,543 565,556 250,920 -317,174 -527,689 -659,939 -427,783

Military Personnel - PCS 5,499 -34,706 -85,093 -174,266 -271,667 -298,118 -858,351 Transfer to HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other 29,663 3,007 -113,699 -181,745 -201,716 -205,741 -670,231 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 -2,578 0 0 -51 0 -2,629 Civilian ES (End Strength) -9,203 -18,983 -23,123 -22,250 -23,254 -23,254 -120,067

Military ES (End Strength) -1,936 -4,873 -7,757 -8,241 -8,261 -8,261 -39,329

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 681,189 1,233,970 834,317 -308,273 -738,008 -1,098,782 604,413

- 5-

BASE CLOSURE IV BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (1995 COMMISSION)


Closure/Realignment Location: Overall Financial Summary 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 165,446 61,603 213,425 118,368 20,635 0 0 0 579,477 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 91,919 81,142 102,314 114,281 123,232 384,552 221,624 249,146 1,368,210

Studies 11,138 1,891 2,351 1,252 1,272 1,250 571 0 19,725 Compliance 67,038 37,314 23,275 25,125 12,443 79,673 15,928 12,822 273,618

Restoration 13,743 41,937 76,688 87,904 109,517 303,629 205,125 236,324 1,074,867 Operations & Maintenance 228,950 287,670 120,642 73,734 55,586 41,465 15,414 12,269 835,730 Military Personnel - PCS 1,543 710 2,402 0 76 9 0 0 4,740

Financial Adjustment (DISA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 -24,800 0 -24,800 Other 1,203 491 0 3,401 2,387 643 0 0 8,125

TOTAL COSTS 489,061 431,616 438,783 309,784 201,916 426,669 212,238 261,415 2,771,482 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 -13,697 -8,800 0 0 0 -22,497 Financial Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,475 -2,475 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 489,061 431,616 438,783 296,087 193,116 426,669 214,713 258,940 2,748,985

Savings Military Construction -4,900 0 -1,400 -1,100 -1,310 -15,540 0 0 -24,250 Family Housing 0 -1,836 -9,583 -20,724 -21,383 -22,071 0 0 -75,597

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 -1,836 -9,583 -20,724 -21,383 -22,071 0 0 -75,597

Operations & Maintenance 11,670 30,259 -85,863 -106,044 -109,000 -117,907 0 0 -376,885 Military Personnel - PCS 230 520 -28,150 -47,546 -58,272 -66,795 0 0 -200,013 Other -566,082 -509,166 -549,874 -465,262 -491,633 -505,351 0 0 -3,087,368

Civilian ES (End Strength) -4,353 -6,348 -7,695 -7,624 -7,131 -6,993 0 0 -40,144 Military ES (End Strength) 0 115 -805 -896 -1,248 -1,254 0 0 -4,088

TOTAL SAVINGS -559,082 -480,223 -674,870 -640,676 -681,598 -727,664 0 0 -3,764,113

Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 160,546 61,603 212,025 117,268 19,325 -15,540 0 0 555,727 Family Housing 0 -1,836 -9,583 -20,724 -21,383 -22,071 0 0 -75,597 Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Operations 0 -1,836 -9,583 -20,724 -21,383 -22,071 0 0 -75,597 Environmental 91,919 81,142 102,314 114,281 123,232 384,552 221,624 249,146 1,368,210

Studies 11,138 1,891 2,351 1,252 1,272 1,250 571 0 19,725 Compliance 67,038 37,314 23,275 25,125 12,443 79,673 15,928 12,822 273,618 Restoration 13,743 41,937 76,688 87,904 109,517 303,629 205,125 236,324 1,074,867

Operations & Maintenance 240,620 317,929 34,779 -32,310 -53,414 -76,442 15,414 12,269 458,845 Military Personnel - PCS 1,773 1,230 -25,748 -47,546 -58,196 -66,786 0 0 -195,273

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -564,879 -508,675 -549,874 -461,861 -489,246 -504,708 0 0 -3,079,243 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 -13,697 -8,800 0 0 0 -22,497

Financial Adjustment (DISA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 -24,800 0 -24,800 Financial Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,475 -2,475 0

Civilian ES (End Strength) -4,353 -6,348 -7,695 -7,624 -7,131 -6,993 0 0 -40,144 Military ES (End Strength) 0 115 -805 -896 -1,248 -1,254 0 0 -4,088

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -70,021 -48,607 -236,087 -344,589 -488,482 -300,995 214,713 258,940 -1,015,128

Note: The funds available in FY-02 will be supplemented by prior year BRAC funds as directed by Congress.

- 7 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 4010 - Naval Air Facility, Adak, AK 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 25,850 29,493 38,266 32,770 17,662 12,625 15,800 17,300 189,766

Studies 682 77 60 6 0 17 0 0 842 Compliance 24,683 2,229 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,912

Restoration 485 27,187 38,206 32,764 17,662 12,608 15,800 17,300 162,012 Operations & Maintenance 898 3,468 329 2,865 7,011 607 0 0 15,178 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 26,748 32,961 38,595 35,635 24,673 13,232 15,800 17,300 204,944 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 26,748 32,961 38,595 35,635 24,673 13,232 15,800 17,300 204,944

Savings Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Operations & Maintenance 0 -997 -8,669 -11,906 -12,264 -12,631 0 0 -46,467 Military Personnel - PCS 0 -478 -10,505 -20,548 -21,005 -21,441 0 0 -73,977

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 -12 -515 -515 -515 -515 0 0 -2,072

TOTAL SAVINGS 0 -1,475 -19,174 -32,454 -33,269 -34,072 0 0 -120,444 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 25,850 29,493 38,266 32,770 17,662 12,625 15,800 17,300 189,766

Studies 682 77 60 6 0 17 0 0 842 Compliance 24,683 2,229 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,912

Restoration 485 27,187 38,206 32,764 17,662 12,608 15,800 17,300 162,012 Operations & Maintenance 898 2,471 -8,340 -9,041 -5,253 -12,024 0 0 -31,289 Military Personnel - PCS 0 -478 -10,505 -20,548 -21,005 -21,441 0 0 -73,977

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 -12 -515 -515 -515 -515 0 0 -2,072

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 26,748 31,486 19,421 3,181 -8,596 -20,840 15,800 17,300 84,500

- 8 -

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE IV (1995 COMMISSION) NARRATIVE SUMMARY

4010 - Naval Air Facility, Adak, AK

CLOSURE/REALIGNMENT ACTION

The 1995 BRAC Commission recommended the closure of Naval Air Facility (NAF) Adak. Adak supported anti-submarine warfare surveillance and other operations and training for the U.S. Pacific Fleet. NAF Adak operationally closed on March 31, 1997. The Naval Facility Adak, a tenant of NAF Adak, also closed. Naval Security Group Activity, a separate command on Adak Island, was disestablished outside the base closure process. All of Adak Island is within the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. Navy use of the northern portion for military purposes is authorized by a public land withdrawal, which retained wildlife refuge status. Under current law, the only available avenues for disposition of Navy's real property interests are indefinite retention by Navy or reversion to, and acceptance of custody by, Department of Interior (DOI). DOI has stated that it will not accept custody unless and until Navy removes improvements and contaminants that would create long-term liabilities for DOI, and restores the property to refuge suitable condition. A Land Exchange Agreement was signed in September 2000 by Navy, Interior, and The Aleut Corporation that would enable The Aleut Corporation to obtain property at Adak by exchange with the DOI pursuant to relinquishment of the Navy public land withdrawal. Certain provisions of the exchange agreement must be ratified by special legislation. Special legislation to ratify the agreement was introduced in the Congress during 2001. The current projected date for transfer is December 2004, which assumes that ordnance clearance activities do not encounter any unexpected issues, that regulators provide timely concurrence in the Operable Unit (OU) B Record of Decision and FOST, and that The Aleut Corporation accepts conveyance per the terms of the agreement.

ONE-TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS

Military Construction

No requirement.

Family Housing Construction

No requirement.

Family Housing Operations

No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

- 9 -

Compliance

No requirement.

Installation Restoration

Environmental restoration requirements are based on the best information available from the Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA) about planned reuse. The LRA has submitted a conceptual reuse plan that includes development of three remote bays and substantial residential development in currently undeveloped areas. In other respects, anticipated reuses do not vary significantly from current land use, and that is the approach on which cleanup plans have been formulated. The primary economic activities are expected to relate to the fishing industry in the North Pacific and Bering Sea. Fish processing, fuel sales, and logistics and transportation support to the fishing industry are the likely predominant future reuse activities. EPA placed NAF Adak on the National Priorities List in May 1994. A Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) was signed among Navy, EPA and the State of Alaska addressing Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) issues. A separate agreement (State Adak Environmental Restoration Agreement, or SAERA) was signed in 1994 by Navy and the State of Alaska, and amended in 1996, addressing petroleum issues. CERCLA remedies have been decided in a comprehensive Record of Decision for Operable Unit A, signed by the Navy in October 1999 and concurred in by regulators in April 2000. This Record of Decision addresses all restoration issues at Adak except safety risks associated with ordnance and explosives (OE) and unexploded ordnance (UXO). The OU A ROD establishes a framework for Focused Feasibility Studies that will identify additional required cleanup actions for certain petroleum sites that have not yet attained remedial objectives. These Focused Feasibility Studies are underway in 2001. Ordnance issues are being addressed as a separate Operable Unit (OU) B, which is subdivided geographically into OU B-1 and OU B-2. In March 1999 EPA notified Navy of its intent to pursue formal Dispute Resolution under the FFA due to disagreements with Navy about the scope of ordnance investigation and clearance activities required under applicable regulations. A Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC) comprised of senior managers from the EPA, Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), and the Navy was formed. The DRC appointed a Project Team comprised of Project Managers from the three agencies, as well as US Fish and Wildlife Service, The Aleut Corporation, and Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association. The Project Team was chartered to develop solutions to the issues that created the impasse. The Project Team developed a site screening process, a conceptual risk model, and a Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan. Execution of the work plan began in the 2000 field season and continues in 2001. A Proposed Plan for OU B-1 was released for public review and comment in May 2001. Both Record of Decisions for OU B-1 & OU B-2 are anticipated to be completed in FY 2002. A subsequent Record of Decision for OU B-2 is expected during 2002. Approximately 3,000 acres of undeveloped land containing the highest levels of ordnance contamination will be retained for a longer period until it can be remediated sufficiently to permit access and use. Requirements Overview Funding is required in FY02-03 for ordnance clearance work in OU B-2, remedial actions for petroleum contaminated sites, to conduct long term

- 10 -

maintenance, long term operation, and long term monitoring activities pursuant to the CERCLA Operable Unit A Record of Decision, as well as estimated operating expenses associated with those activities. These long-term maintenance and monitoring requirements will continue through FY07 and beyond. Details FY02-03 requirements include extensive cleanup of petroleum contaminated soil and groundwater to comply with applicable regulations, ordnance clearance in former OB/OD and range areas, implementation of an institutional controls management plan, marine monitoring by United States Geological Survey, inspection and maintenance of all physical features included as elements of the system of institutional controls, and long term monitoring (LTM) of the effectiveness of all CERCLA remedies.

Operations and Maintenance

Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.

Military Personnel -- PCS

No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.

Operations & Maintenance

None.

Military Personnel - PCS

None.

- 11 -

Other

None.

- 13 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 2200 - NAS Agana, Guam 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 1,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,215 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 331 102 2,309 4,027 3,807 11,156 1,942 1,768 25,442

Studies 62 10 0 48 34 0 0 0 154 Compliance 222 27 139 456 27 775 55 0 1,701

Restoration 47 65 2,170 3,523 3,746 10,381 1,887 1,768 23,587 Operations & Maintenance 14 63 843 728 275 0 0 0 1,923 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 1,560 165 3,152 4,755 4,082 11,156 1,942 1,768 28,580 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 1,560 165 3,152 4,755 4,082 11,156 1,942 1,768 28,580



Operations & Maintenance 0 -3,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3,700 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other -2,630 0 -4,450 0 0 0 0 0 -7,080 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS -2,630 -3,700 -4,450 0 0 0 0 0 -10,780 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 1,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,215 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 331 102 2,309 4,027 3,807 11,156 1,942 1,768 25,442


Restoration 47 65 2,170 3,523 3,746 10,381 1,887 1,768 23,587 Operations & Maintenance 14 -3,637 843 728 275 0 0 0 -1,777 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -2,630 0 -4,450 0 0 0 0 0 -7,080

Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -1,070 -3,535 -1,298 4,755 4,082 11,156 1,942 1,768 17,800

- 14 -


2200 - NAS Agana, Guam


The 1993 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission directed the closure of Naval Air Station (NAS) Agana and relocation of Navy aviation units and support to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. Navy planned to retain and continue to utilize family housing units and selected personnel support facilities but this decision was redirected by the BRAC IV Commission which required that all Navy facilities close. NAS was operationally closed on 31 March 1995. All parcels were disposed of by September 2000, except the power plant, which will be transferred under special legislation.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

For BRAC III, in compliance with the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation must be completed prior to implementation of disposal/reuse actions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was initiated in FY 1994. The document was put on hold while the Navy waited for a final reuse plan from the Local Reuse Authority. An approved reuse plan was provided and the EIS/Record of Decision (ROD) was completed in FY00.

Compliance

The removal of Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) and Above Ground Storage Tanks has been completed. All mission-related hazardous material and hazardous wastes were removed from the base prior to closure in April 1995. Abatement of lead-based paint in the Officer’s Family Housing Area, and friable, damaged, and accessible asbestos at all areas were completed. Additional compliance funding is required for updating the Environmental Baseline Study (EBS).


The environmental requirements are linked to the LRA's plan for reuse. The property will be conveyed to the Government of Guam via Public Benefit

- 15 -

Conveyance, Economic Development Conveyance, Homeless Conveyance, Fed-To-Fed Conveyance, and Highways Conveyance. The Public Benefit Conveyance will be for the airport and easement, and park-recreational parcels that will be used for airport and park-recreational activities. The Economic Development Conveyance will be for the commercial-industrial parcel and the former Officer’s housing area that will be used for commercial and business office developments and residential use. The Homeless conveyance will be for the homeless parcel that will be used for homeless assistance programs. The Fed-to-Fed conveyance will be for transfers to FAA and the NOAA Weather Service to support airport operations. The Highway conveyance will be for the highway parcel that is for the additions and improvements of new and existing roads. The CERCLA property includes two (2) Installation Restoration sites, twenty-six (26) Points of Interest sites, and a base-wide groundwater investigation that is grouped into three Operable Units (OUs). OUs 1 and 2 have been further designated as airport and easement, commercial-industrial, homeless, park recreational, and roadway parcels. OU-3, which is the base-wide groundwater investigation, encompasses all parcels. Tiyan is not on the National Priorities List (NPL). Early transfer of all remaining parcels occurred on 29 September 2000. The following is a synopsis of the status of work requiring FY03 funding for completing cleanup of IR and Points of Interest (POI) sites relating to the conveyance parcels: Airport Operation and Support Area Parcel - This parcel consists of twenty-one sites. The FY03 budget requirements include remedial action at Site 1, IRP-01 NAS Agana Sanitary Landfill. Contaminants identified in this landfill include cleaning solvents, medical waste, paint sludge, construction debris, and household refuse. A Removal Site Evaluation was completed. FY03 required funding is necessary to complete installation of the geosynthetic clay layer cap on the Agana Landfill and for Long Term Monitoring. Basewide - OU-3, Basewide Groundwater, Site 29. The BRAC Cleanup Team (BCT) agreed to natural attenuation and wellhead treatment as the remedy for the groundwater contamination. Installation of a granular activated carbon system has been completed to treat trichloroethylenes (TCEs) at the only drinking water production well on the property. Site closeout will be based on the installation of wellhead treatment system and monitored natural attenuation. Groundwater monitoring will be conducted to demonstrate that natural attenuation of TCE is occurring. FY03 funding is for Remedial Action – Operation. Agana Power Plant at the Public Works Center will be transferred to Guam Power Authority (GPA) under the Customer Service Agreement, a pre-existing transfer authority compatible with BRAC. In the interim, GPA is using the site as a transformer and switching station under a lease. The environmental requirements are linked to the LRA's plan for reuse. An Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) Report for the Agana Power Plant (APP) was prepared in August 1996. Eight Points of Interest (POI) sites were identified. Remedial investigations (RI) have been funded for the APP sites. The Agana Power Plant sites include: the above ground fuel storage area, a drum storage area, generator storage area, substation yard, former mobile station, storm water outlets, battery storage area and groundwater requirements. The APP sites that have been cleaned up include the on-site Poly Chlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) contaminated soil and the above ground fuel storage area. A time-critical off-site removal action

- 16 -

of PCB contaminated soil was completed in July 2000. Phase I of the on-site investigation of subsurface soil and groundwater began in May 2000 to determine the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination and the need for further cleanup actions. Phase II will began FY01 to determine the acceptable methods of cleanup should contamination levels warrant removal actions. An off-site investigation to determine background levels of PCB contamination in the Agana Swamp and to identify any other sources of PCBs began in June 00. FY03-04 requirement for funding is phased to meet regulatory cleanup requirements, long-term monitoring and operations and planned conveyance dates. There are a total of 2 restoration sites (Site 35, Storm Water Outlets; and Site 37; Groundwater) remaining to be completed. This budget will complete all environmental cleanup requirements (except Long Term Maintenance and Operation needs) at these 2 sites including Remedial Actions by FY03. Remedial Action Operation for treating groundwater contamination at Site 37 will start in FY03.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

None anticipated

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.

- 17 -


None.

Other

None.

- 19 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1650 - NAS Alameda, CA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 16,310 2,049 131 0 0 0 0 0 18,490 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 1,419 154 966 3,361 1,874 45,190 23,888 20,144 96,996

Studies 270 0 0 0 71 176 76 0 593 Compliance 679 154 908 1,979 474 6,598 1,973 162 12,927

Restoration 470 0 58 1,382 1,329 38,416 21,839 19,982 83,476 Operations & Maintenance 5,729 70 0 41 622 109 50 52 6,673 Military Personnel - PCS 122 206 96 0 0 0 0 0 424

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 23,580 2,479 1,193 3,402 2,496 45,299 23,938 20,196 122,583 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 23,580 2,479 1,193 3,402 2,496 45,299 23,938 20,196 122,583



Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military Personnel - PCS 0 -801 -1,649 -1,615 -1,575 -1,608 0 0 -7,248

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 -46 -46 -42 -42 -42 0 0 -218

TOTAL SAVINGS 0 -801 -1,649 -1,615 -1,575 -1,608 0 0 -7,248 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 16,310 2,049 131 0 0 0 0 0 18,490 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 1,419 154 966 3,361 1,874 45,190 23,888 20,144 96,996

Studies 270 0 0 0 71 176 76 0 593 Compliance 679 154 908 1,979 474 6,598 1,973 162 12,927

Restoration 470 0 58 1,382 1,329 38,416 21,839 19,982 83,476 Operations & Maintenance 5,729 70 0 41 622 109 50 52 6,673 Military Personnel - PCS 122 -595 -1,553 -1,615 -1,575 -1,608 0 0 -6,824

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 -46 -46 -42 -42 -42 0 0 -218

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 23,580 1,678 -456 1,787 921 43,691 23,938 20,196 115,335

- 20 -


1650 - NAS Alameda, CA


NAS Alameda consists of two sites: (1) NAS Alameda and (2) Alameda Annex. The 1993 Commission recommended the closure of Naval Air Station (NAS) Alameda, which supported aviation squadrons, aircraft carriers, and surface operations and training for the U.S. Pacific Fleet. Pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-510 Title XXIX, as implemented by the base closure process of 1993, Naval Air Station Alameda (NAS Alameda) closed on April 30, 1997. The Naval Aviation Depot (NADEP) Alameda, a tenant of NAS Alameda, closed in September 1996. The Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority completed a reuse plan in January 1996. Disposal will be by an economic development conveyance, public benefit conveyances, lease termination, and Federal transfer of a Least Tern refuge to the Fish and Wildlife Service. Housing will either be transferred to the Coast Guard or the Coast Guard will lease it back. The anticipated final disposal date of the property at NAS Alameda is September 2010. Navy used the existing special legislation to convey the Alameda Annex/ Alameda Facility to the City of Alameda in July 2000.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

Pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) a record of decision was issued in February 2000. The BRAC IV closure of FISC Oakland Alameda Annex and Facility comes under the same Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) and Reuse Plan as the BRAC III NAS Alameda closure, so the actual EIS analysis was integrated into the NAS Alameda BRAC III EIS. The California Least Tern has been listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered since 1970. As such, the Navy, as a federal

- 21 -

agency, has a responsibility under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (as amended) to use its authority to carry out programs for the conservation of endangered and threatened species. The Navy has historically managed the Least Tern colony at NAS Alameda, the most northerly colony for this species and the largest of only two active colonies in San Francisco Bay, by providing both colony monitoring and predator management during the breeding season (generally 1 April through 15 September). Funding for this effort is essential to meeting Navy ESA obligations; this funding is required until the Navy transfers custody of the land on which the colony is located (FED 1A and 1B) to the USFWS. The least tern colony is located entirely within the FED 1A and 1B transfer parcels. Expectations are that the USFWS will require two years of predator management after transfer of the property.

Compliance

NAS Alameda - The Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) was completed for NAS Alameda in FY00. Regulatory concurrence on the environmental condition of property (ECP) was obtained for all parcels. FY03-04 funding requirements are for admending the basewide Environmental Baseline Survey regarding the Environmental Condition of Property: FOST Preparation for EDC 3, 5, and FED 1A; 3 CAA continued operation of systems; and Long Term Monitoring of UST C1 (Active Fuel Lines) and 6CAA. Alameda Annex – No requirement.


NAS Alameda - The environmental requirements are linked to the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) plan for reuse. The property is being developed for mixed use including residential enclaves, light industry, a marina, a golf course, a regional park, and a university campus. The property will be conveyed to the ARRA via an EDC; to the City of Alameda and the Alameda Unified School District through PBCs; and to DOI for a Least Tern habitat area and wildlife refuge. A portion of the housing acquired by the ARRA under the EDC will be leased back to the Coast Guard in lieu of the Federal transfer of the housing to the Coast Guard. The CERCLA property includes 25 Installation Restoration (IR) sites. The IR sites are in 14 Conveyance Parcels: EDC 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 19; and Fed 2 and 4; and PBC 1B. NAS Alameda is on the National Priorities List (NPL) and is currently negotiating a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA). The following is a synopsis of the status of work being executed and the FY03 requirements at the IR sites as they relate to the Conveyance Parcels. Conveyance Parcels EDC 3, 4, 5, 12, 17, 18, 20 and 21; PBC 1A, and 3; Fed 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B and 2C; and Term 1 – The upland and submerged acreage available for transfer via Funding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) at NAS Alameda is 1,965 acres or 73.4% of the total property. These parcels represent the largest single portion of land to be transferred and have the earliest projected transfer date. Likely reuse scenarios include

- 22 -

residential enclaves, light industry, a regional park, and a golf course. Parcel Term-1 is 160 acres of property (5 acres of uplands) belonging to the City of Alameda that is leased to the Navy. Parcels Fed 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B and 2C comprise 1,037 acres of upland and submerged property slated for transfer to the USFWS for use as a wildlife refuge. Parcels EDC 20 and 21 are 71 acres of upland that are included in the leaseback to the USCG. Conveyance Parcels EDC 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 16 and PBC 1B - IR Sites 6, 7, 8, 14, 15, and 16 comprise 44 upland acres dispersed throughout NAS Alameda. All portions of these properties are scheduled for transfer to the ARRA with light industry and recreation as the likely reuse scenario. -- IR Site 6 is the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Facility. The Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPC) at Site 6 are soil Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) and groundwater Chlorinated solvents (CHL). FY03 required funding at IR Site 6 is for Remedial Design of cleanup by media filtration; precipitation; air stripping Granulated Activated Carbon (GAC) adsorption-gas; GAC adsorption-liquid phase; extraction well/shallow (10) and injection well/shallow (10). -- IR Site 7 is the former Navy Exchange Service Station. The COPCs at Site 7 in the soil are benzene, PAHs, Poly Chlorinated Biphenols (PCBs), lead and in the groundwater benzene and PAHs. Funding is required for IR Site 7 is RD and RA by extraction wells/shallow; injection wells; media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption-gas; GAC adsorption-liquid phase -- IR Site 8 is the Pesticide Storage Area. The COPCs at Site 8 are soil PCBs and groundwater benzene and PAHs. FY03 requirements are for phase 7 Long Term Monitoring (LTM) for IR Site 8 which is planned over a 5-year period. -- Site 14 is the Fire Training Area. The COPCs at Site 14 are soil dioxin, PAH, CHL and groundwater CHL, benzene. FY03 required funding is for RD including sampling and analysis, excavation (1KCY); haul and backfill; central Bioremediation Facility Land treatment (0.5KCY); low temperature thermal desorption transport to offsite RCRA landfill disposal facility (solid waste) (1K CY); media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- IR Site 15 is the Former Transformer Storage Area. The COPCs at Site 15 are soil PCBs, metals. FY03 required funding is for RD including sampling and analysis; excavation; haul and backfill (3KCY); transport to offsite RCRA landfill disposal facility (solid waste); disposal fees and taxes for PCB solid waste. At IR Site 15, excavation of contaminated soil within the northerly fence has been completed. The excavated portion of Site 15 was backfilled with clean soil. The contaminated soil was trucked to off-site landfills. Additional work is required after confirmatory sampling revealed further contamination north of the fence line. -- IR Site 16 is C-2 CANS Area. The COPCs at Site 16 are soil PCBs and groundwater CHL. At IR Site 16 a contaminated soil removal action has been completed. FY03 requirements are for Conveyance Parcel EDC 13 - IR Site 1 a 135-acre upland site, is located in the northwest corner of NAS Alameda and is programmed as a golf course in the Community Reuse Plan. IR Site 1 is a landfill (1943-1956 Disposal Area). The COPCs at Site 1 are soil PAHs, PCBs, Low Level Radiological (RAD) and groundwater CHL. IR Site 1 funding requirements for FY-03 include completion of the RI/FS, initiation and completion of an RD. Funnel and Gate monitoring will continue. The RA is currently planned as a soil cap for 25 acres; iron curtain wall; RAD anomaly removal and unexploded ordnance (UXO) removal. LTO and LTM are averaged over 10 years including iron curtain wall and cap maintenance, sample collection and analysis for groundwater and sediments. Radiological surveys of the landfill at IR Site 1 were completed. A demonstration by University of Waterloo for treatment of chlorinated solvents and BTEX (Benzene, Toluene,

- 23 -

Ethyl benzene, Xylenes) in groundwater is continuing. Conveyance Parcels EDC 9, 10, 15, 19, and Fed 4 - IR Sites 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 21, 22, and 23 comprise about 151 acres of upland with reuse scenarios that include light industry, regional parks, and a golf course. -- IR Site 3 is the Abandoned Fuel Storage Area. The COPCs at Site 3 are soil benzene, metals, CHL and groundwater arsenic, benzene, PAH, CHL. FY-03 IR Site 3 funding requirements are for RD. RA for IR Site 3 is free product extraction wells; oil/water separation; RCRA landfill disposal (liquid waste); media filtration; air stripping; GAC adsorption for gas and liquid phase. -- IR Site 4 is the Aircraft Engine Facility. The COPCs for Site 4 are soil chromium, PAH, CHL and groundwater arsenic, benzene, PAHs, CHL. FY-03 required funding is for RD. RA for IR Site 4 includes electrokinetics; media filtration; air stripping; GAC adsorption for gas and liquid phase; and extraction wells. -- IR Site 5 is the Aircraft Rework Facility. The COPCs at Site 5 are soil metals (Ca 570ppm/Cr 850ppm), Cyanide (9270ppm), CHL (vinyl chloride 0.08ppm), PAHs (9.1ppm) and groundwater beryllium, nickel, benzene, CHL (vinyl chloride 243.8ppb/ trichloroethylene 2297.5ppb/ perchloroethylene 766ppb/1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 17092ppb/1, 1-Dichloroethane 40000ppb/1, 1-Dichloroethylene 4217ppb/1, 4-Dichlorobenzene 11ppb/Chloroform 38ppb/toluene 763ppb/benzene 10ppb), PAH (Naphthalene 479ppb/cyanide 3520ppb), also RAD in drain lines. FY-03 funding is for RD and an Interim Removal Action (IRA) including RAD piping removal (1LS), media filtration (50GPM); precipitation (50GPM); air stripping (50GPM); GAC adsorption gas (100CFM) and liquid (50GPM) phase; extraction and injection wells (50GPM); electrokinetics (7,000CY). -- IR Site 9 is the Paint Stripping Facility. The COPCs at Site 9 are soil beryllium and groundwater PAHs, metals, CHL, benzene. FY03 required funding is for RI/FS and RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- IR Site 10 is the Missile Rework Operations. The COPCs at Site 10 are soil CHL and groundwater beryllium, benzene, CHL, PAHs, and RAD in drain lines. Required FY03 funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- Site 11 is the Engine Test Cell. The COPCs at Site 11 are soil PAHs, CHL, petroleum and groundwater arsenic, benzene, PAHs, CHL. Required FY03 funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- IR Site 12 is the Power Plant. The COPCs at Site 12 are soil PAHs and CHL and groundwater beryllium, benzene, CHL, PAHs. Required FY03 funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- IR Site 13 is the Former Pacific Oil Refinery. The COPCs at Site 13 are soil beryllium, benzene, PAHs, petroleum and groundwater PAHs, metals, benzene. Required FY03 funding is for RI/FS and RD for Site 13. RA will include sampling and analysis, excavation (10KCY), haul and backfill offsite landfill disposal; media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- Site 19 is the Hazardous Waste Storage Yard D-13. The COPCs at Site 19 are soil PAH, petroleum and groundwater PAHs, metals, CHL, benzene. FY03 requirements are for RI/FS for Site 19 includes excavate, haul and backfill offsite landfill disposal (5KCY); media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells.

- 24 -

-- Site 21 is the Ship Fitting and Engine Repair. The COPCs at Site 21 are soil CHL, PCBs, metals and groundwater arsenic, benzene, PAH, CHL. FY03 required funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- Site 22 is the Former Service Station. The COPCs at Site 22 are beryllium, benzene, petroleum and groundwater PAHs, metals, benzene. Required FY03 funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. -- Site 23 is the Missile Rework Operations. The COPCs at Site 23 are soil chromium and groundwater PAHs, metals, benzene. Required FY03 funding is for RD including media filtration; precipitation; air stripping; GAC adsorption gas and liquid phase; extraction and injection wells. Conveyance Parcels EDC 1, 2, and Fed 2 - Operable Unit 4 is comprised of IR Sites 2, 17, 18, 20, and 24. Sites 17 and 24, EDC 2, comprise about 139 acres of submerged property, scheduled for transfer to the City for use as a marina. Site 2, designated Fed 2 and covering 145 acres of upland area, is the contaminated portion of the USFWS transfer mentioned in the discussion above. -- IR Site 2 is a landfill and the COPCs are soil PAHs, PCBs, metals, RAD, UXO and groundwater PAHs, CHL, BTEX. FY03 funding requirements include RI/FS, and RD. -- IR Site 17 is the Seaplane Lagoon the COPCs in the sediment are metals, PCBs, PEST, PAH, petroleum. FY03 funding requirements include RD for a RCRA landfill disposal facility (solid waste) (19,500 TON). LTM is averaged over 10 years for sample collection and analysis. Treatability studies are underway through the University of California at Berkeley (UCB) for IR Site 2 and 17. These studies will evaluate the feasibility of using innovative technologies and examine Intrinsic Bioremediation of contaminated sediment. Also at IR Site 17, studies for potential early treatability of sediments at the Seaplane Lagoon are underway. Minor characterization of the site was recommended to determine bioavailability and the lateral and vertical extent of contamination. -- Site 20 is the Oakland Inner Harbor with COPCs in the sediment of metals, PCBs, pest, PAH, petroleum. Funding requirements in FY03 includes RD for dredging and RCRA off-site disposal of solid (9,000TON) and liquid (100KGAL) waste. Site 20 is 46 acres of submerged property and is the last piece of property scheduled for transfer. -- Site 24 is the Pier 1 and 2 sediments. COPCs for Site 24 include metals, PCBs, pest, PAH, petroleum. The funding requirements include RD for dredging and disposal (40KCY/ClassII). Conveyance Parcel Fed 4 - IR Site 25. This 47.95-acre upland site is the contaminated portion of the USCG transfer/leaseback mentioned in the discussion above. The COPCs at Site 25 are PAHs well above anthropogenic background conditions. FY03 funding requirements are for RI/FS and RD including sampling and analysis. Alameda Annex – The Alameda Annex is not on the NPL, therefore, a Federal Facilities State Remediation Agreement was signed between the Navy and DTSC in 1992. A new FFSRA was signed in 2000. RI/FS for the 8 IR sites have been completed; 4 sites were recommended for no further action. PARCEL C-1 (Alameda Facility North): FY03 requirements include provisions for two IR sites (IR 4 &6). These sites are expected to be no action sites

- 25 -

with regard to CERCLA contaminants, however they will require remediation for petroleum. Planned reuse is commercial/light industrial for the north parcel. IR 4 &6 are contiguous sites formerly used for painting operations and storage of hazardous materials. The RI found no CERCLA contaminants at this site but did find Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) that will require remediation. A corrective action work plan is being developed for this site. FY03 requirements are for Remedial Action and Remedial Action Operation at Sites 4 & 6. PARCEL E (Alameda Annex Scrapyard): FY03 funding requirements include cleanup of the scrapyard area IR 2. IR 2 has surface contamination of PCB’s and cadmium at levels above the acceptable risk range that will require removal of up to a foot of surface soil and replacement with clean soil and possibly paving. The Feasibility Study has been completed.


Real Estate

Leasing and disposal of this activity will occur incrementally over a period of years, with final disposal projected for September 2010. Some continuing real estate support costs will be incurred as conveyance parcel boundaries are refined to reflect updated environmental conditions and required institutional controls are negotiated and refined.

Caretaker

All caretaker labor and general support for Alameda is provided out of the consolidated San Francisco Bay Area Caretaker Site Office, budgeted under Naval Station Treasure Island, except for site specific CSO support costs. The Alameda Cooperative Agreement expired and the City has taken caretaker responsibility for the entire base that is not being used for clean up or CSO operations. Caretaker costs are for minimal oversight; environmental permits, sampling, and spill response; utility consumption; and funding our share for office operations until the remaining property is transferred.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

The property will be conveyed under a no-cost economic development conveyance. No sales or lease revenue is anticipated.

SAVINGS


None.

- 26 -


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 27 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1820 - NSWC-Carderock, Annapolis, MD 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 2,654 6,284 26,044 0 0 0 0 0 34,982 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 392 877 759 111 322 360 0 0 2,821


Restoration 20 32 575 0 322 0 0 0 949 Operations & Maintenance 8,716 1,544 10,066 6,039 2,216 567 1,507 0 30,655 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 1,114 0 0 534 1,664 0 0 0 3,312

TOTAL COSTS 12,876 8,705 36,869 6,684 4,202 927 1,507 0 71,770 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 12,876 8,705 36,869 6,684 4,202 927 1,507 0 71,770



Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other -1,590 -5,010 -10,520 -14,200 -14,626 -15,065 0 0 -61,011 Civilian ES (End Strength) -19 -51 -176 -176 -176 -176 0 0 -774 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS -1,590 -5,010 -10,520 -14,200 -14,626 -15,065 0 0 -61,011 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 2,654 6,284 26,044 0 0 0 0 0 34,982 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 392 877 759 111 322 360 0 0 2,821


Restoration 20 32 575 0 322 0 0 0 949 Operations & Maintenance 8,716 1,544 10,066 6,039 2,216 567 1,507 0 30,655 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -476 -5,010 -10,520 -13,666 -12,962 -15,065 0 0 -57,699

Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) -19 -51 -176 -176 -176 -176 0 0 -774 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 11,286 3,695 26,349 -7,516 -10,424 -14,138 1,507 0 10,759

- 28 -


1820 - NSWC-Carderock, Annapolis, MD


The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division Detachment, including the NIKE Site, Annapolis MD, was operationally closed on 30 December 1999. Appropriate functions such as personnel, and equipment were relocated to the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Carderock Division Detachment, Philadelphia, PA; the Naval Surface Weapons Center, Carderock Division, Carderock, MD; and the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. The fuel storage/refueling site and water treatment facilities were transferred to the Naval Station, Annapolis to support the U.S. Naval Academy and Navy housing. Subsequently, the Naval Station found these facilities were not required and deemed them excess. They will be transfered under separate deed to the LRA at the same time as the main site. Final deed transfer expected April, 2002.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

- 29 -

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 31 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 4280 - NISMC, Arlington, VA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Studies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Compliance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 109 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 109 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 109



Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 -507 -522 -538 0 0 -1,567 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS 0 0 0 -507 -522 -538 0 0 -1,567 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 109 -507 -522 -538 0 0 -1,458 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 0 0 109 -507 -522 -538 0 0 -1,458

- 32 -


4280 - NISMC, Arlington, VA


Relocate the Naval Information Systems Management Center from leased space in Arlington, Virginia, to the Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

- 33 -

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 35 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1860 - Naval Recruiting Command, Arlington, VA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 10 750 5,404 4,292 0 0 0 0 10,456 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operat ions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 92 8 470 3,898 0 0 0 0 4,468 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 102 758 5,874 8,190 0 0 0 0 14,924 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 102 758 5,874 8,190 0 0 0 0 14,924



Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 -167 -143 -125 0 0 -435 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other -10,112 1,108 1,189 197 203 209 0 0 -7,206 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS -10,112 1,108 1,189 30 60 84 0 0 -7,641 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 10 750 5,404 4,292 0 0 0 0 10,456 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 92 8 470 3,731 -143 -125 0 0 4,033 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -10,112 1,108 1,189 197 203 209 0 0 -7,206


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -10,010 1,866 7,063 8,220 60 84 0 0 7,283

- 36 -


1860 - Naval Recruiting Command, Arlington, VA


Change the receiving site for the Naval Recruiting Command, Washington, D.C., specified by the 1993 Commission from "Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Illinois" to "Naval Support Activity, Memphis, Tennessee."



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

- 37 -

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


Savings are the result of a reduction in lease costs, as well as a reduction in civilian personnel salary and support.


None.

Other

None.

- 39 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1835 - NAVSEA, Arlington, VA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 8,700 16,885 112,180 69,627 0 0 0 0 207,392 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 85 170 349 4,307 5,914 16,542 0 0 27,367 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 9,162 17,085 112,529 73,934 5,914 16,542 0 0 235,166 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 9,162 17,085 112,529 73,934 5,914 16,542 0 0 235,166



Operations & Maintenance 0 0 600 1,525 34 -5,682 0 0 -3,523 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other -40,590 -93,025 -9,778 -4,624 0 0 0 0 -148,017 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS -40,590 -93,025 -9,178 -3,099 34 -5,682 0 0 -151,540 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 8,700 16,885 112,180 69,627 0 0 0 0 207,392 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 85 170 949 5,832 5,948 10,860 0 0 23,844 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -40,590 -93,025 -9,778 -4,624 0 0 0 0 -148,017


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -31,428 -75,940 103,351 70,835 5,948 10,860 0 0 83,626

- 40 -


1835 - NAVSEA, Arlington, VA


The 1995 base closure process changed the receiving sites specified by the 1993 Commission for the relocation of the Naval Sea Systems Command, including the Nuclear Propulsion Directorate (SEA 08), the Human Resources Office supporting the Naval Sea Systems Command, and associated PEOs and DRPMs, from "the Navy Annex, Arlington, Virginia; Nebraska Avenue, Washington, D.C.; Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, Virginia; or the White Oak facility, Silver Spring, Maryland" to "the Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C. or other government-owned property in the metropolitan Washington D.C. area." NAVSEA was relocated to newly constructed and rehabilitated facilities at the Washington Navy Yard. The final relocation occurred in July 2001.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

- 41 -

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 43 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1839 - Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Other -7,100 -2,087 523 535 554 592 0 0 -6,983 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SAVINGS -7,100 -2,087 523 535 554 592 0 0 -6,983 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -7,100 -2,087 523 535 554 592 0 0 -6,983


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -7,100 -2,087 523 535 554 592 0 0 -6,983

- 44 -


1839 - Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA


Change the recommendation of the 1993 Commission by deleting the Office of Naval Research from the National Capital Region activities to relocate from leased space to Government-owned space within the NCR. Because of other BRAC-95 actions, space designated for this activity pursuant to the BRAC-93 decision is no longer available.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

- 45 -

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 47 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1837 - SPAWAR, Arlington, VA 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 2,512 496 64 0 0 0 0 0 3,072 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 17,592 40,221 3,397 0 0 0 0 0 61,210 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 63

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 20,104 40,717 3,524 0 0 0 0 0 64,345 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 20,104 40,717 3,524 0 0 0 0 0 64,345



Operations & Maintenance 0 -810 -14,018 -10,560 -7,251 -7,529 0 0 -40,168 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 -1,691 -3,502 -3,582 -3,660 0 0 -12,435

Other -389 -15,132 -12,018 -9,384 -9,582 -9,738 0 0 -56,243 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 -44 -44 -44 -44 0 0 -176

TOTAL SAVINGS -389 -15,942 -27,727 -23,446 -20,415 -20,927 0 0 -108,846 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 2,512 496 64 0 0 0 0 0 3,072 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 17,592 39,411 -10,621 -10,560 -7,251 -7,529 0 0 21,042 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 -1,628 -3,502 -3,582 -3,660 0 0 -12,372

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other -389 -15,132 -12,018 -9,384 -9,582 -9,738 0 0 -56,243

Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civilian ES (End Strength) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Military ES (End Strength) 0 0 -44 -44 -44 -44 0 0 -176

NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 19,715 24,775 -24,203 -23,446 -20,415 -20,927 0 0 -44,501

- 48 -


1837 - SPAWAR, Arlington, VA


Change the recommendation for the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Arlington, VA specified by the 1993 Commission from "relocate from leased space to Government-owned space within the NCR, to include the Navy Annex, Arlington, Virginia; Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C.; 3801 Nebraska Avenue, Washington, D.C.; Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, Virginia; or the White Oak facility, Silver Spring, Maryland" to "Relocate from leased space to Government-owned space in San Diego, California, to allow consolidation of the Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, with the Space and Naval Warfare Command headquarters."



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.

- 49 -


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


Savings will result from the relocation from leased space to government-owned space. Additional savings will occur from a reduction in civilian personnel billets, as part of the consolidation.


Savings are the result of a reduction in military billets.

Other

None.

- 51 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 1630 - NAS Barbers Point, HI 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 6 57 243 8,223 22,072 1,322 410 32,333


Restoration 0 0 10 243 7,250 21,074 1,119 237 29,933 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 1,380 1,031 544 374 3,329 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 6 57 243 9,603 23,103 1,866 784 35,662 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 0 6 57 243 9,603 23,103 1,866 784 35,662





TOTAL SAVINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 6 57 243 8,223 22,072 1,322 410 32,333


Restoration 0 0 10 243 7,250 21,074 1,119 237 29,933 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 1,380 1,031 544 374 3,329 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 0 6 57 243 9,603 23,103 1,866 784 35,662

- 52 -


1630 - NAS Barbers Point, HI


The 1993 BRAC Commission recommended the closure of Naval Air Station (NAS) Barbers Point, which supported five patrol (P-3) squadrons, one Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System (LAMPS) helicopter squadron, an Executive Transport Department and the U.S. Coast Guard air operations for the central Pacific and Hawaii, and other miscellaneous activities. Aviation squadrons relocated to NAS Whidbey and MCB Hawaii. The Coast Guard remains at NAS Barbers Point. NAS Barbers Point family housing is retained to address the existing housing shortfalls in the Pearl Harbor region. Operational closure was 2 July 1999.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

Background: Environmental compliance requirements are linked to the Local Redevelopment Authority's (LRA's) plan for reuse. Completed environmental compliance projects include: twenty-five underground storage tank (UST) sites and a fuel farm have been closed and remediated; two fuel lines with a total length of approximately 37,000 feet were closed; asbestos and lead-based paint surveys were conducted at 350 facilities, and abatement of asbestos hazards was conducted at 20 buildings; sediments that exceeded hazardous waste criteria were removed from 69 dry wells, concrete contaminated by polychlorinated biphenyls was remediated, and four oil/water separators were closed prior to base closure. FY03 funds will be required to complete the update of the Environmental Baseline Survey started in FY02.

- 53 -


Background: The environmental requirements are linked to the LRA's plan for reuse. The property is being developed for mixed use, including Federal agency use, schools, aviation, parks, Navy-retained areas, and homeless assistance. The property will be conveyed to various agencies via mechanisms including PBCs, Fed-to-Fed transfers, special legislation and negotiated sales. There are 18 IR sites in the BRAC area at former NAS Barbers Point. RIs were conducted at 15 IR sites, and eight sites required further study or cleanup. These sites are within the Public Parks (City), Public Parks (State), Main Site to U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Wastewater, and National Guard parcels. The Regional Groundwater System, Stormwater Drainage Ditch, and the Transformer Substation System are basewide sites that do not affect the transfer of specific parcels, but require funding to complete monitoring and remediation. NAS Barbers Point is not listed on the National Priorities List. It does not have a Federal Facility Agreement or a Federal Facility State Regulatory Agreement. The following is a synopsis of the status of work being executed at IR sites as they relate to the conveyance parcels: Basewide - A No Action CERCLA ROD was signed for Site 19, the Regional Groundwater System, in April 1999. Funds have been budgeted annually from FY02 through FY03 for Long Term Monitoring (LTM) to comply with provisions of the CERCLA ROD. Contaminated soil and sediment from Site 20 was transported in FY98 and FY99 to a temporary stockpile facility off-site for future treatment of polychlorinated bipheyls (PCBs) and disposal. Institutional controls were placed on some of the transformer substations in Site 20, and 24 substations were included in two CERCLA RODs signed in April 1999 and June 1999. The Navy is in the process of selecting an appropriate treatment alternative. FY02-03 funds have been budgeted for an Interim Removal Action at an additional area of contamination identified at one of the transformer sites, excavate an additional 600 cubic yards of soil and concrete and for Long Term Monitoring. Endangered Plant – 1 & 2 Parcels – FY02-03 funds are required to meet the conveyance date in September 2003. Planned reuse of this parcel is for wildlife habitat. Further data assessment is currently being conducted at Site 2, a natural pond used for disposal of ordnance-related metals, agitene drums, and scrap metal, to determine whether cleanup or additional monitoring will be required. FY02 budget funds the sampling necessary to support the ecological risk assessment for this site, prepare the design for the removal action, conduct the removal action, dredge 2,000 cubic yards of sediment from the pond, and dispose the sediment at an off-island landfill City Park – 1 through 11 Parcels – FY02-03 funds were budgeted to meet the conveyance date in March 2002. The parcels will be used for play fields, campgrounds, beaches, training facilities, and other recreational uses. A removal site evaluation (RSE) is being conducted to support a removal action at Site 1, a former quarry used for uncontrolled disposal, storage of waste oil, and discharge of wash water from an airplane hangar wash rack. Funds have been budgeted through FY06 to conduct LTM at the consolidation unit and to conduct a CERCLA 5-year review. State Park – 1 through 3 Parcels - FY02-03 budget is needed to support the

- 54 -

cleanup schedule that is being negotiated with the State. Funding is for Long Term Monitoring of the remediation of lead- and arsenic- contaminated soil at Site 18, the Former Southern Trap and Skeet Range Requirements: Funding required in FY02-03 is phased to meet planned conveyance dates and other agreements. There are 18 IR sites in the BRAC area at the base and the required funding will complete all cleanup by FY03 with only Remedial Action Operation and Long Term Monitoring remaining in FY03 and out years.


Real Estate

Costs include real estate and other related labor support requirements necessary to complete disposition of the property, which include public benefit conveyances, federal to federal transfers, and negotiated sales. No contract funds are required at this time.

Caretaker

The CSO office is headed by a GS-13. Maintenance of real property and utilities is budgeted based on an as required basis to meet base reuse while minimizing cost. Security services will be procured from a Navy activity. Remaining Navy assets or the local community will provide fire and police services.


No requirement.

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

Parcels of NAS Barbers Point are planned for Federal transfers, public benefit conveyances (PBCs), and negotiated sales. No land sales revenues will be realized from the Federal transfers or PBCs; revenues from the negotiated sales will only be realized if these sales are consummated. Legislation requires recovery of the remaining depreciated value of commissary store and non-appropriated funded (NAF) investments in real property impacted by BRAC actions where possible. Navy implementing guidance directs the deposit of sale proceeds and lease receipts generated at a closure site, up to the amount of the remaining depreciated value, be deposited into the reserve account established for this purpose. The remaining depreciated value of commissary store and NAF investments at NAS Barbers Point is $2,249,171.

SAVINGS


None.

- 55 -


None.


None.


None.


None.

Other

None.

- 57 -



Closure/Realignment Location: 4420 - MSCLANT, Bayonne, NJ 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL One-time Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 3,285 0 0 0 0 0 3,285 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL COSTS 0 0 3,285 0 0 0 0 0 3,285 Land Sales Revenue (-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST 0 0 3,285 0 0 0 0 0 3,285





TOTAL SAVINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Implementation Costs Military Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Family Housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



Restoration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 3,285 0 0 0 0 0 3,285 Military Personnel - PCS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 0 0 3,285 0 0 0 0 0 3,285

- 58 -


4420 - MSCLANT, Bayonne, NJ


The 1995 Commission recommended the closure of Military Traffic Management Command in Bayonne, NJ. This is an Army BRAC action for which MSCLANT is a tenant. In an effort to realize early savings, through a MSC-wide re-engineering, MSCLANT moved to Camp Pendleton, VA in FY 1998.



No requirement.


No requirement.


No requirement.

Environmental

Studies

No requirement.

Compliance

No requirement.


No requirement.


Real Estate

No requirement.

Caretaker

No requirement.


No requirement.

- 59 -

Other

No requirement.

Land Sales Revenue

No requirement.

SAVINGS


None.


None.


None.


None.

Military Personnel - P

Documents

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY...Military Personnel - PCS 0 4,728 6,406 318 177 0 0 11,629 HAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 332 9,100 19,400 46,242 2,315 556 0 77,945 TOTAL COSTS 67,800 353,000 658,627