2
Dental fear and locus of control: a pilot study Short Communication Per Otto Neverlien Dental Practice. Vikersjnd. Norway Neverlien PO: Dental fear and locus of control: a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 127. Abstract - In a pilot study among 25 Norwegian elementary schoolchildren age 13 the external part of a Health Locus of Control (HLC) inventory, when scored in internal direction, showed remarkably high positive correlations with clinical anxiety (r = 0.81) and scores on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) (r = 0.77). The high correlation between the E-part of the HLC scale and CDAS was upheld when HLC was given to 19 children 20 months later. All other correlations in the pilot study were moderate to absent. Key words: behavioral dental science; locus of control Per Otto Neveriien, PO Box 75., N-3371 Vikersund, Norway Accepted for publication 7 November 1987 The relatiotiship between the I-E scale of ROTTER (1) and anxiety is problematic (2). Commonly externals are found to be more anxious than internals (2, 3), but a recent study showed no relationship between health locus of control and den- tal anxiety (4). Other reports indicate that different pretreatment information to externals and internals may be helpful in their adjustment to dental (5) and medical (6) treatment. A Norwegian translation of a Health Locus of Control (HLC) scale (7) was given to 25 elementary schoolchildren (age 13) in rural Norway as a pilot test. Item five was omitted from final analysis because several children did not compre- hend the meaning, resulting in question marks. This was not the case with the remaining 10 items, out of which five were worded in external and five in inter- nal direction. Prior to the HLC the chil- dren answered Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) (8). During the next 10 days their clinical behavior was rated (9) by a trained dentist. Twenty months later the HLC was mailed to the 25 children. Nineteen returned a filled in question- naire. The results confirm earlier conclusions that internal and external orientation do not constitute a continuum, and as a full scale does not indicate level of dental anxiety (4). They also support a notion that internality may not be meaningful to children (10). The E-part ofthe scale when scored in internal direction corre- lates highly with CDAS (r = 0.77; P<0.01) and clinical rating (r=0.81; P<0.0\). Correlation between CDAS and clinical rating is negligible (r = 0.18). Correlation between HLC at the first test and 20 months later is moderate for full scale (r=0.48; J'<0.05). The only other correlation to reach a level of significance over the 20-month period is between E- part of HLC, internally scored, and CDAS (r=0.85; P<0.01). Locus of con- trol, being central in anxiety research (11), might still be of interest in dental anxiety research. References 1. ROTTER JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psyehol Monogr 1966; 80: 1-28. 2. JOE VC. Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psyehol Rep 1911: 2S: 619-40. 3. DUKE MP. COHEN B. LOCUS of control as an indicator of patient cooperation. Implications for preventive dentistry. J Am Coll Dent 1975; 42: 174-8. 4. ScHUURS AHB, DuiVENvooRDHK HJ, THODEN VAN VELZEN SK, VERHAGE F, MAKKES PC, EtiKMAN MAJ, Psychologic correlates of dental anxiety. Community Dent Orat Epidemiol 1986: y^. 69-72, 5. ALIERBACH SM, KENDALL PC. CLTTLER HF, LEVITT NR. Anxiety, locus of control, type of preparatory information, and adjustment to dental surgery. J Consult Clin Psyehol 1976; 44: 809-18. 6. MILLER SM. When is a little information a dangerous thing? Coping with stressful events by monitoring versus blunting. In: LEVINE S, URSIN H , eds. Coping and health. New York: Plenum Press, 1980; 145-69. 7. WALLSTON BS, WALLSTON KA. KAPLAN GD, MAIDES SA. Development and validation of the Health Locus of Control (HLC) scale. / Consult Clin Psyehol 1976; 44: 580-5. 8. CORAH NL. Development of a Dental Anxiety Scale, J Dent Res 1969; 48: 596. (only). 9. KOENIGSBERG SR. JoHNSON R. Child behavior during three denta! visits. / Dent Child 1975; 42: 197-200. 10. GoCHMAN DS, Some steps towards a psychological matrix for health behavior. Can J Behav Sei 1971; i; 88-101, 11. ScHEiER MF, CARVER CS. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. J Pers 1987; 55: 1-42.

Dental fear and locus of control: a pilot study

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Dental fear and locus of control:a pilot study

Short CommunicationPer Otto NeverlienDental Practice. Vikersjnd. Norway

Neverlien PO: Dental fear and locus of control: a pilot study. Community DentOral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 127.

Abstract - In a pilot study among 25 Norwegian elementary schoolchildren age 13the external part of a Health Locus of Control (HLC) inventory, when scored ininternal direction, showed remarkably high positive correlations with clinical anxiety(r = 0.81) and scores on Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) (r = 0.77). The highcorrelation between the E-part of the HLC scale and CDAS was upheld when HLCwas given to 19 children 20 months later. All other correlations in the pilot studywere moderate to absent.

Key words: behavioral dental science; locus ofcontrol

Per Otto Neveriien, PO Box 75., N-3371Vikersund, Norway

Accepted for publication 7 November 1987

The relatiotiship between the I-E scale ofROTTER (1) and anxiety is problematic(2). Commonly externals are found to bemore anxious than internals (2, 3), buta recent study showed no relationshipbetween health locus of control and den-tal anxiety (4). Other reports indicatethat different pretreatment informationto externals and internals may be helpfulin their adjustment to dental (5) andmedical (6) treatment.

A Norwegian translation of a HealthLocus of Control (HLC) scale (7) wasgiven to 25 elementary schoolchildren(age 13) in rural Norway as a pilot test.Item five was omitted from final analysisbecause several children did not compre-hend the meaning, resulting in questionmarks. This was not the case with theremaining 10 items, out of which fivewere worded in external and five in inter-nal direction. Prior to the HLC the chil-dren answered Corah's Dental AnxietyScale (CDAS) (8). During the next 10days their clinical behavior was rated (9)by a trained dentist. Twenty months laterthe HLC was mailed to the 25 children.Nineteen returned a filled in question-naire.

The results confirm earlier conclusionsthat internal and external orientation donot constitute a continuum, and as a fullscale does not indicate level of dental

anxiety (4). They also support a notionthat internality may not be meaningfulto children (10). The E-part ofthe scalewhen scored in internal direction corre-lates highly with CDAS (r = 0.77;P<0.01) and clinical rating (r=0.81;P<0.0\). Correlation between CDASand clinical rating is negligible (r = 0.18).Correlation between HLC at the first test

and 20 months later is moderate for fullscale (r=0.48; J'<0.05). The only othercorrelation to reach a level of significanceover the 20-month period is between E-part of HLC, internally scored, andCDAS (r=0.85; P<0.01). Locus of con-trol, being central in anxiety research(11), might still be of interest in dentalanxiety research.

References1. ROTTER JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

Psyehol Monogr 1966; 80: 1-28.2. JOE VC. Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psyehol

Rep 1911: 2S: 619-40.3. DUKE MP. COHEN B. LOCUS of control as an indicator of patient cooperation. Implications

for preventive dentistry. J Am Coll Dent 1975; 42: 174-8.4. ScHUURS AHB, DuiVENvooRDHK HJ, THODEN VAN VELZEN SK, VERHAGE F, MAKKES PC,

EtiKMAN MAJ, Psychologic correlates of dental anxiety. Community Dent Orat Epidemiol1986: y .̂ 69-72,

5. ALIERBACH SM, KENDALL PC. CLTTLER HF, LEVITT NR. Anxiety, locus of control, type ofpreparatory information, and adjustment to dental surgery. J Consult Clin Psyehol 1976;44: 809-18.

6. MILLER SM. When is a little information a dangerous thing? Coping with stressful eventsby monitoring versus blunting. In: LEVINE S, URSIN H , eds. Coping and health. New York:Plenum Press, 1980; 145-69.

7. WALLSTON BS, WALLSTON K A . KAPLAN GD, MAIDES SA. Development and validation ofthe Health Locus of Control (HLC) scale. / Consult Clin Psyehol 1976; 44: 580-5.

8. CORAH NL. Development of a Dental Anxiety Scale, J Dent Res 1969; 48: 596. (only).9. KOENIGSBERG SR. JoHNSON R. Child behavior during three denta! visits. / Dent Child 1975;

42: 197-200.10. GoCHMAN DS, Some steps towards a psychological matrix for health behavior. Can J Behav

Sei 1971; i ; 88-101,11. ScHEiER MF, CARVER CS. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of

generalized outcome expectancies on health. J Pers 1987; 55: 1-42.