1
1421 An upward trend in psychosomatic illness might be inferred, Dr. HALLIDAY argues, if morbidity statistics showed an increase both in the average duration of incapacity and in the certificated causes known to cover psychosomatic illness, and if these increases were most marked in the younger age-groups. Actually the Scottish data available since 1930 show marked increases of this kind among insured persons certified as incapable of work. The number of " chronic " patients-i.e., those on the sick list continuously throughout a statistical year, has increased by one-third ; and in the year 1935-36, the latest for which statistics have been published, such " chronic " illnesses accounted for more than one-half of the nineteen and three-quarter million days of incapacitating sickness among the Scottish insured population. The chief increase has been in the conditions covering psychosomatic disorders and in the younger age-groups. Dr. HALLIDAY thinks the ordinary methods of medical examination should be modified to provide for the detection and treat- ment of underlying psychosomatic factors ; other- wise the extended provision of facilities for the mechanistic treatment of symptoms may, by inducing fixation, increase the duration of in- validism. He quotes with approval Dr. MCKINLAY.’S remark: " The efficiency of a service must ultimately be judged by the standard of health of the people rather than by the nature and amount of the facilities available for its preservation." Dr. WALKER, on the other hand, thinks Dr. HALLIDAY attributes greater relative importance to psychosomatic factors in the rise in incapaci- tating sickness than can be justified by the statistical evidence ; for there has been, he insists,2 a definite rise in certificated causes of incapacity which are certainly of organic origin—e.g., tuber- culosis and injuries. To diminish incapacitating sickness he would provide fuller facilities for early diagnosis, so that trivial conditions may be dis- tinguished from conditions which, though not trivial, present initially trivial symptoms. There is need also for routine and periodical medical examination for adults as well as for children. He is convinced, however, that the psychic element in disease is of great importance, and he concludes that " the large volume of incapacitating illness due to or associated with states of anxiety can be prevented, not so much by psycho-analytic or other psychotherapeutic methods of treatment, but by Christian sympathy and understanding and a re-awakening in the patient and his attendants of the spirit and faith of the Great Healer." In this conclusion Dr. WALKER is in general agreement with Dr. C. G. JuN&, who has stated 3 that among his patients over the age of 35 there was not one whose problem in the last resort was not that of finding a religious outlook on life, and who con- cluded a congress of psychotherapy at Oxford in the recent summer with the words : "It is an insanity of the white man that he has lost the religious order of life." 2 J. R. sanit. Inst. August, 1938. 3 Modern Man in Search of a Soul, London, 1933. 4 See Lancet, August 6th, pp. 325, 336. DENTAL AUTONOMY SiR FRANCIS AcLAND thinks the time may have come for the dental profession to be master in its own house. He was opening the 35th session of the Dental Board of the United Kingdom, and was recalling the steps which led up to the establish- ment of a separate dental council. The story begins with the departmental committee which twenty years ago inquired into the extent and gravity of the evils of dental practice by persons not properly qualified. This committee, over which AcLAND himself presided, came to the conclusion that the control of the dental profession and the custody of a register should be entrusted to a statutory board under the General Medical Council. Sir DONALD MAcALiSTER had reminded the committee that in 1878, when the first Act regulating dental practice was passed, dentistry was put under the medical council because there was no dental profession ; this outside control was to him a step in the evolution which he regarded as ultimately inevitable, namely, the establishment of a separate dental council. Sir FRANCIS ACLAND himself speaks of the Dental Board as it now exists as the kind of halfway house in which British people are generally comfortable for some time. The action of the Dental Board is at present limited in three directions. The board cannot direct the erasure of the name of a registered dental practitioner for professional misconduct or in consequence of conviction in a court of law : it can only report its findings to the General Medical Council and leave them to act. Further, although recruits to the profession are now almost without exception graduates or licentiates in’dental surgery or dentistry, the G.M.C. still retain the power of dealing with applications for registration as colonial or foreign dentists by persons holding qualifications granted elsewhere, and also the power to recognise additional qualifications granted after examination. The compilation of the register is in fact still under divided control, and in the sphere of dental educa- tion there is also some division of function between the two bodies. The G.M.C. retain the power to question licensing bodies about courses of study and methods of examining, to arrange for visitation of examinations, and to prohibit any attempt to impose restrictions as to theories of dentistry on candidates offering themselves for examination. It is therefore the General Medical Council and not the Dental Board which influences the progress of dental education by making recommendations with which licensing bodies find it necessary to comply- although the board spends much time and money on the award of bursaries, on raising the standard of teaching in dental schools, and on improving their premises and equipment. Whether the time has now come for some redistribution of functions between the medical and dental councils, Sir FRANCIS AcLAND did not regard it as for him to say ; he simply stated the problem for the consideration of both bodies. But to state the problem is enough. No one doubts the competence of the Dental Board to manage its own affairs.

DENTAL AUTONOMY

  • Upload
    buikhue

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1421

An upward trend in psychosomatic illness mightbe inferred, Dr. HALLIDAY argues, if morbiditystatistics showed an increase both in the averageduration of incapacity and in the certificatedcauses known to cover psychosomatic illness, andif these increases were most marked in the youngerage-groups. Actually the Scottish data availablesince 1930 show marked increases of this kind

among insured persons certified as incapable ofwork. The number of " chronic " patients-i.e.,those on the sick list continuously throughout astatistical year, has increased by one-third ; andin the year 1935-36, the latest for which statisticshave been published, such " chronic " illnessesaccounted for more than one-half of the nineteenand three-quarter million days of incapacitatingsickness among the Scottish insured population.The chief increase has been in the conditions

covering psychosomatic disorders and in the

younger age-groups. Dr. HALLIDAY thinks the

ordinary methods of medical examination shouldbe modified to provide for the detection and treat-ment of underlying psychosomatic factors ; other-wise the extended provision of facilities for themechanistic treatment of symptoms may, byinducing fixation, increase the duration of in-validism. He quotes with approval Dr. MCKINLAY.’Sremark: " The efficiency of a service must

ultimately be judged by the standard of health ofthe people rather than by the nature and amountof the facilities available for its preservation."

Dr. WALKER, on the other hand, thinks Dr.HALLIDAY attributes greater relative importanceto psychosomatic factors in the rise in incapaci-tating sickness than can be justified by thestatistical evidence ; for there has been, he insists,2a definite rise in certificated causes of incapacitywhich are certainly of organic origin—e.g., tuber-culosis and injuries. To diminish incapacitatingsickness he would provide fuller facilities for earlydiagnosis, so that trivial conditions may be dis-tinguished from conditions which, though not

trivial, present initially trivial symptoms. Thereis need also for routine and periodical medicalexamination for adults as well as for children.He is convinced, however, that the psychic elementin disease is of great importance, and he concludesthat " the large volume of incapacitating illnessdue to or associated with states of anxiety can beprevented, not so much by psycho-analytic or

other psychotherapeutic methods of treatment,but by Christian sympathy and understanding anda re-awakening in the patient and his attendants ofthe spirit and faith of the Great Healer." In thisconclusion Dr. WALKER is in general agreementwith Dr. C. G. JuN&, who has stated 3 that amonghis patients over the age of 35 there was not onewhose problem in the last resort was not that offinding a religious outlook on life, and who con-cluded a congress of psychotherapy at Oxford inthe recent summer with the words : "It is aninsanity of the white man that he has lost thereligious order of life."

2 J. R. sanit. Inst. August, 1938.3 Modern Man in Search of a Soul, London, 1933.

4 See Lancet, August 6th, pp. 325, 336.

DENTAL AUTONOMY

SiR FRANCIS AcLAND thinks the time may havecome for the dental profession to be master in itsown house. He was opening the 35th session ofthe Dental Board of the United Kingdom, andwas recalling the steps which led up to the establish-ment of a separate dental council. The story beginswith the departmental committee which twentyyears ago inquired into the extent and gravity ofthe evils of dental practice by persons not properlyqualified. This committee, over which AcLANDhimself presided, came to the conclusion that thecontrol of the dental profession and the custodyof a register should be entrusted to a statutoryboard under the General Medical Council. SirDONALD MAcALiSTER had reminded the committeethat in 1878, when the first Act regulating dentalpractice was passed, dentistry was put under themedical council because there was no dental

profession ; this outside control was to him a stepin the evolution which he regarded as ultimatelyinevitable, namely, the establishment of a separatedental council. Sir FRANCIS ACLAND himself speaksof the Dental Board as it now exists as the kindof halfway house in which British people are

generally comfortable for some time.The action of the Dental Board is at present

limited in three directions. The board cannot directthe erasure of the name of a registered dentalpractitioner for professional misconduct or in

consequence of conviction in a court of law : itcan only report its findings to the General MedicalCouncil and leave them to act. Further, althoughrecruits to the profession are now almost withoutexception graduates or licentiates in’dental surgeryor dentistry, the G.M.C. still retain the power of

dealing with applications for registration as colonialor foreign dentists by persons holding qualificationsgranted elsewhere, and also the power to recogniseadditional qualifications granted after examination.The compilation of the register is in fact still underdivided control, and in the sphere of dental educa-tion there is also some division of function betweenthe two bodies. The G.M.C. retain the power to

question licensing bodies about courses of study andmethods of examining, to arrange for visitation ofexaminations, and to prohibit any attempt to imposerestrictions as to theories of dentistry on candidatesoffering themselves for examination. It is thereforethe General Medical Council and not the DentalBoard which influences the progress of dentaleducation by making recommendations with whichlicensing bodies find it necessary to comply-although the board spends much time and moneyon the award of bursaries, on raising the standardof teaching in dental schools, and on improvingtheir premises and equipment.Whether the time has now come for some

redistribution of functions between the medical anddental councils, Sir FRANCIS AcLAND did not regardit as for him to say ; he simply stated the problemfor the consideration of both bodies. But to state the

problem is enough. No one doubts the competenceof the Dental Board to manage its own affairs.