Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends Report Series
DEMOGRAPHICS
Fiscal Year 2013
Produced by Texas A&M University, Human Resources, January 2013
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 2
Contents
Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Demographics Analytics and Analyses University-wide and Executive Level Headcount ....................................................................................6
Employees by Gender ................................................................................................................................9 Employees by Race/Ethnicity ................................................................................................................. 10 Employees by Age Range ......................................................................................................................... 12 Employees by Years of Service ................................................................................................................ 13 Employees by Education Level ............................................................................................................... 14 Employees by EEO Job Category and Management Span .................................................................... 15 Interesting Facts ...................................................................................................................................... 18
Appendix 1: Overview, Scope and Methodology ........................................................................................... 19 Appendix 2: Detail Data
Item 1: Number of Employees University-wide by Executive Level .................................................... 20 Item 2: Number of Employees by Gender by Executive Level .............................................................. 21 Item 3: Number of Employees by Race/Ethnicity by Executive Level ................................................ 22 Item 4: Number of Employees by Age Range by Executive Level ........................................................ 23 Item 5: Number of Employees by Years of Service by Executive Level ............................................... 24
Item 6: Number of Employees by Education by Executive Level .........................................................25
Item 7: Number of Employees by EEO Job Category by Executive Level ........................................... 26
Appendix 3: Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 1: Number of Employees by Gender by Division/College ............................................................. 27
Item 2: Number of Employees by Race/Ethnicity by Division/College .............................................. 28
Item 3: Number of Employees by Age Range by Division/College ...................................................... 29
Item 4: Number of Employees by Years of Service by Division/College ............................................. 30
Item 5: Number of Employees by Education by Division/College ....................................................... 31
Item 6: Number of Employees by EEO Job Category by Division/College ......................................... 32
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 3
Executive Summary
Introduction The health of an organization depends in large part on the recruitment, retention and leadership of its single most-valuable resource: its employees. To that effort, the Staff Workforce and Analytics Trends report series is designed to put informative data and analyses into the hands of Texas A&M University management. Eight periodic reports provide human resource-related information on budgeted staff employees and include relevant metrics, trends and commentary. Information in this Demographics report focuses on a variety of characteristics of who we are and what we do at Texas A&M University. Texas A&M University is one of the largest state employers in the Brazos and surrounding counties. The focus of this report is on those employees considered to be budgeted staff employees; however the university also employs thousands of faculty, student employees, graduate assistants and seasonal employees. Staff employees make up approximately 65% of the university’s total budgeted workforce, and are generally employees who do not perform teaching responsibilities in their primary duties. Staff employees include a vast array of positions, from administrative assistant to nurse, police officer to lab technician, student development specialist to director. These employees daily provide the administrative, accounting, maintenance, and other support functions in nearly 170 departments that enable the university to fulfill its core mission of teaching, research and public service. Demographics are the personal and professional characteristics of an organization's workforce, broad descriptors of the duties they perform, and the organizational structures under which they report. The information allows a greater understanding of the strengths and diversity employees bring to the table and the complexity inherent in larger organizations. Recognizing trends or changes in employee demographics may allow for more effective leadership and management in support of employee and organizational success and improve workplace satisfaction. Overall Observations The demographic data reflects the economic realities during the past three years both locally and nationally as the university was challenged to manage costs and increase revenue to balance reductions in state appropriations while also harnessing more resources for classroom and research needs. Additionally, these data reflect the efforts by Texas A&M, as well as many other institutions of higher education, to streamline business operations by contracting with external vendors to perform certain functions. The university’s reduction-in-force actions and other budget strategies during FY2011 and FY2012 were eclipsed by the campus-wide change from the decision to outsource some services at the end of FY2012. The contractual agreements with the third-party vendor resulted in substantial cost savings to the university and a significant impact on the size and makeup of the staff workforce. More than 2,000 filled and vacant positions in 19 departments including budgeted staff, working retiree, temporary wage and student employee positions were eliminated under the contract terms. The outsourcing action affected approximately 1,600 active employees. Budgeted staff was the largest group of those affected employees with nearly 1,100 staff employees transitioned to employment with the vendor.
Texas A&M University has 170
departments with 4,800
budgeted staff employees and
2,600 faculty supporting the
core teaching, research and
service mission of the university.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 4
The university’s budgeted staff workforce declined from 5,949 employees in FY2011 to 4,834 by FY2013. The loss of 1,115 employees was a 19% reduction in the staff workforce in three years. A significant portion of the total loss was due to the outsourcing action although there had been a general downward trend in employee headcount for several years. The outsourcing of dining, maintenance, custodial and landscape services, and the administrative staff to manage those services, had a greater impact on the non-academic units of Vice President for Administration and the Vice President for Student Affairs. The effects of various budget strategies and the outsourcing action during the past three years can be seen in the university’s diversity presence, employee longevity and organizational headcounts, with the most significant impact on the makeup of employees by education level and job categories.
Female employees remained about 57% of the workforce even though they were more than three-quarters of the reduction in staff headcount between FY2011 and FY2012, and just over half of the reduction between FY2012 and FY2013.
The percentage of Minority employees, which for many years hovered right at or just over 30%, decreased to just below 25% in FY2013. Employees identified as White, Hispanic and Black represented the greatest decrease in headcount, particularly as a result of the outsourcing action.
Most staff employees continue to be between the ages of 45 and 54. Employees age 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 years represented 70% of the total reduction in headcount.
Employees with two to five years of service continued to represent the largest group of employees by service time although they represented 41% of the reduction in workforce.
Most employees who transitioned to the external vendor were in positions that did not require post-secondary education and many involved manual skilled labor with on the job education or training. Many of the affected employees had at or below a high school degree or GED equivalent and were in Service/Maintenance, Secretary/Clerical and Skilled Craft positions. The result during the past three years is a workforce where 71% possess some level of post-secondary education and 58% are in Professional Non-Faculty positions.
The university has an opportunity to make inroads into a more diverse workforce as new employees are hired into vacant positions or new positions are created to meet ever-changing societal expectations, research expansion, or increasing state and federal regulations. Although the university will continue to evaluate strategies to meet fiscal challenges, it should nevertheless strive to attain Vision 2020 goals of increasing diversity in all its forms. Senior leadership and department heads and directors should actively recruit to more closely resemble the diversity of our state and nation, to emphasize the excellent benefits and Aggie environment that make the university a great place to work, and to utilize worklife initiatives and compensation practices that reward and retain an engaged workforce and keeps the institutional knowledge close to home. The university’s greatest resource is its employees; knowing who they are and valuing everything they bring to the table benefits the entire organization.
The loss of 1,115 employees
was a 19% reduction in the
staff workforce between
FY2011 and FY2013.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 5
Report Content This report’s primary emphasis is to display demographic and position-related data on budgeted staff employees. There are seven sets of data included in the Analytics and Analyses portion of the report on the following pages: University-wide and Executive Level Headcount; Employees by Gender; Employees by Race/Ethnicity; Employees by Age Range; Employees by Years of Service; Employees by Education Level; and, Employees by EEO Job Category and Management Span, and are followed by a compilation of interesting facts about the staff workforce. The seven data sets are reported at the University level for three fiscal years, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Following the Analytics and Analyses is Appendix 1 which describes the data sources and scope, Appendix 2 which provides detail data by executive level for the seven data sets, and Appendix 3 which provides supplemental data for the Academic Affairs divisions and colleges.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 6
5949 5860
4834
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Headcount Trend
19% reduction in 3 years
Demographics Analytics and Analyses 1. University-wide and Executive Level Headcount University-wide headcount represents the sum total of the number of employees counted one time each in their primary position and in the assigned ADLOC/Department for their position within Texas A&M University. Headcount does not take into consideration percent effort, appointment months or multiple positions held by one employee, e.g., an employee working in a primary position as a Clerk II and a football game attendant would only be counted once in the Clerk II position. This information is useful to understand the number of employees for which the organization is responsible for providing leadership, supervising, rewarding, assuring compliance, developing policies and practices, addressing work-life issues, and understanding the organization’s impact on the local community. Headcount may also provide a view of performance and efficiency measures when compared to total student population, budget, or other metrics. The university’s budgeted staff workforce declined from 5,949 employees in FY2011 to 4,834 by FY2013. The loss of 1,115 employees was a 19% reduction in the staff workforce in three years. A significant portion of that loss was at the end of FY2012 due to an outsourcing action, although there has been a general downward trend in employee headcount for several years.
Staff headcount decreased 89 employees (- 1.5%) from FY2011 to FY2012 and decreased again 1,026 employees (-17.5%) from FY2012 to FY2013.
The most dramatic change in the university workforce was the outsourcing of four operational services – dining, maintenance, custodial and landscape services, and the administrative staff to manage those services – to an outside vendor, Compass Group, Inc., effective August 3, 2013.
More than 2,000 filled and vacant positions in 19 departments including budgeted staff, working retiree, temporary wage and student employee positions were eliminated.
Nearly 1,100 budgeted staff employees were affected by outsourcing action and transitioned to employment with the third-party vendor, while an additional small group of employees elected to retire or transfer to other jobs.
Just less than 50 affected employees retained employment at the university for a maximum of 24 months in order to reach full-retirement benefits eligibility at which time they will transition to the third-party vendor.
The university continues to identify efficiencies in response to the State’s 2012 – 2013 biennium which included state-mandated funding reductions and the potential for further cuts should the economic recovery not be as robust as hoped. With well over 50% of the university’s budget designated for salaries, wages and associated employee benefits, significant cost savings may be
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 7
241 245 248
3140 3050 3087
1434 1468
542
29 27 24143 137 141
674 659489
288 274 2620 0 41
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by Executive Level
President Exec VP & Prov-Acad AffairsVP-Admin VP-Mrkg & ComVP-Research VP-Stu AffairsVP & CFO-Fin Univ Accts
# % # %
President 4 1.7% 3 1.2%
Exec VP & Provost-Acad Affairs -90 -2.9% 37 1.2%
VP-Administration 34 2.4% -926 -63.1%
VP-Marketing & Communications -2 -6.9% -3 -11.1%
VP-Research -6 -4.2% 4 2.9%
VP-Student Affairs -15 -2.2% -170 -25.8%
VP & Cfo-Finance -14 -4.9% -12 -4.4%
University Accounts 41 100.0%
Total Change -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
FY2012-FY2013
Headcount Change by Executive Level
Executive LevelFY2011-FY2012
realized through strategies that include outsourcing, reorganizations, reduction-in-force actions, and elimination of vacant positions, in addition to any operational cost savings. Viewing employee headcount within the organizational hierarchy at its highest groupings, referred to as executive levels, brings awareness of the size and scope of the eight executive levels and a temporary executive-level unit that was established for the employees who will transition employment within two years to the third-party vendor. One executive level includes the 11 colleges and multiple divisions that primarily provide the teaching, research and public service responsibilities of the university. The remaining seven executive-level units are focused on administrative, facilities (administration), marketing, research, student affairs and finance functions within the university. The loss of more than one thousand employees due to the outsourcing action had a greater impact on the non-academic executive-level units, specifically the Vice President for Administration and the Vice President for Student Affairs. The Executive Vice President & Provost for Academic Affairs (Academic Affairs) unit continues to represent the largest executive level at the university, while the Vice President for Administration continues to be the second largest unit despite the outsourcing of more than half of their workforce.
The President executive level was 5% of staff all three years, and includes high-level administrators, Athletics and other functions directly reporting to the President.
The Executive Vice President & Provost for Academic Affairs comprised 52% of staff in FY2011 and FY2012, and 64% in FY2013.
Vice President for Administration was about 25% of staff in FY2011 and FY2012 and 11% in FY2013.
Vice President for Student Affairs, impacted to a lesser degree by the outsourcing action, was 11% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY2012, and 10% by FY2013, although still the third largest unit.
The Vice President for Finance represented about 5% of the workforce all three years.
Vice President for Research was just less than 3% of the workforce FY2011 through FY2013.
The Vice President for Marketing & Communications was less than 1% of the workforce during the three years and the smallest executive level.
The University Accounts executive level was temporarily established as the primary employing unit for 48 employees retained to reach full retirement eligibility; it is anticipated this executive level will no longer be active after FY2014.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 8
107
88
36
144
201
206
173
119
424
82
407
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Agriculture And Life Sciences
Architecture
Bush School Of Gov't & Public Srv
Education
Engineering
Geosciences
Liberal Arts
Mays Business School
Science
TAMU Qatar
Veterinary Medicine
# Employees
Headcount by College - FY2013
1100
248
542
24
141
489
262
41
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Exec V.P. & Provost - Acad Affairs
President
V.P. - Administration
V.P. - Marketing & Communications
V.P. - Research
V.P. - Student Affairs
V.P. & Cfo - Finance
University Accounts
# Employees
Headcount by Executive Unit (excluding Colleges) - FY2013
Considering only the current reporting year, FY2013, the greatest portion of staff employees – nearly two-thirds - is within the executive-level unit comprised of the colleges and multiple divisions that primarily provide the teaching, research and public service responsibilities of Texas A&M.
The eleven colleges within Academic Affairs comprise 1,987 employees, 41% of the staff workforce.
The non-college divisions within Academic Affairs total 1,100 employees, representing 23% of the staff workforce.
The seven executive-level units separate from Academic Affairs total 1,747 employees, 36% of the staff workforce.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 9
3391 3320
27772558 2540
2057
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by Gender
Female Male
# % # %
Female -71 -2.1% -543 -16.0%
Male -18 -0.7% -483 -18.9%
Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
Gender
Headcount Change by Gender
FY2011-FY2012 FY2012-FY2013
2. Employees by Gender Employees by gender are the number of employees as viewed by either female or male gender categories identified from employee personnel records. Gender identification, as well as race and/or ethnicity shown on the next page, are demographics self-reported by each employee within their personnel records in the A&M System’s HRConnect online application. This information is useful to evaluate strategies that can successfully recruit, retain, compensate and develop employees in collaboration with outreach initiatives contributing to the university’s diversity goals. During the three year period, FY2011 through FY2013, the number of female staff employees was considerably greater than male employees.
Female employees accounted for about 57% of the staff workforce from FY2011 through FY2013.
Male employees were about 43% of the workforce during the three years.
Female employees were most often in positions categorized as Professional Non-Faculty (58%), Secretarial/Clerical (21%), or Executive/Administrative/ Manager (10%) positions in FY2013.
Male employees were most often in Professional Non-Faculty (58%), Executive/Administrative/ Manager (14%) or Skilled Crafts (8%) positions in FY2013
The reduction of 1,115 in employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce across gender groups. Female employees were more than three-quarters of the reduction in staff headcount between FY2011 and FY2012, and just over half of the reduction between FY2012 and FY2013.
Female decreased by 614 employees, 55% of the total reduction in staff workforce.
Male headcount decreased by 501 employees, representing 45% of the total reduction.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 10
4069 39683582
576 617359
912 898546
284 280 24897 99 99
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by Race/Ethnicity
White Black Hisp Asian Other
3. Employees by Race/Ethnicity Employees by race/ethnicity (referred hereafter as race) are the number of employees as viewed by one of eight race categories identified from employee personnel records. Race identification, as well as gender shown on the previous page, are demographics self-reported by each employee within their personnel records in the A&M System’s HRConnect online application. Race and/or ethnicity categories are Non-Hispanic (White), Black or African American (Black), Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic), Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (Asian), American Indian or Alaska Native (American Indian), or Two or More Races, with one additional category shown as Unknown for employees who chose not to disclose. This information is useful to evaluate strategies that can successfully recruit, retain, compensate and develop employees in collaboration with outreach initiatives contributing to the university’s diversity goals. Between FY2011 and FY2013, the greatest number and percentage of staff employees were identified as White, with the next two largest groups being those identified as Hispanic or Black.
Employees identified as White were about 68% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY2012, and 74% in FY2013.
Hispanic was 15% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY 2012; and 11% in FY2013.
Employees identified as Black were about 10% of the workforce the first two years, and just over 7% in FY2013.
Asian was about 5% of the workforce all three years even though headcount reduced from 284 in FY2011 to 248 in FY2013.
Employees identified as American Indian, Hawaiian or Two or More totaled 49 in FY2011 (0.7% of the workforce) and 45 by FY2013 (0.9%).
Employees choosing not to disclose were 59 in FY2011 and 54 by FY2013, 1% of the workforce each year.
The reduction of 1,115 in overall employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce across the eight race groups. Employees identified as White, Hispanic and Black represented the greatest decrease in headcount, particularly as a result of the outsourcing action.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 11
# % # %
White -101 -2.5% -386 -9.7%
Black Or African American 41 7.1% -258 -41.8%
Hispanic -14 -1.5% -352 -39.2%
Asian -4 -1.4% -32 -11.4%
Amer Indian Or Alaskan Nat -8 -28.6% 0 0.0%
Hawaiian Or Other Pac Islander 0 0.0% -2 -50.0%
Two Or More Races 2 11.8% 4 21.1%
-Not Specified -5 -8.5% 0 0.0%
Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
FY2012-FY2013
Headcount Change by Race/Ethnicity
Race
FY2011-FY2012
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
Minority 1821 1838 1198
Total Employees 5949 5860 4834
Percentage Minority 30.6% 31.4% 24.8%
Percentage of Minority Employees
Employees identified as White decreased by 487 over the three years and represented 44% of the total reduction.
Employees identified as Black increased headcount between FY2011 and FY2012, but decreased 258 the next period for a net loss of 217 employees, 19% of the three year reduction in headcount.
Hispanic represented 33% of the total reduction during the three years with a loss of 366 employees.
In addition to specific race categories, another view is to group race categories into Non-Minority and Minority to provide a broader view of diversity at the university. For this view, Non-Minority represents employees who self-identified as White. Minority represents aggregated data for employees who self-identified as Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, or Two or More Races.
The percentage of Minority employees, which for many years hovered right at or just over 30%, decreased to just below 25% in FY2013.
Minority employees most often held positions in the job categories of Service/Maintenance (45%), Secretarial/Clerical (29%) and Professional Non-Faculty (25%) in Fy2013.
Non-Minority employees most often were in positions within the Executive/Administrative/ Managerial (84%), Technical/Paraprofessional (79%) and Skilled Craft (76%) in Fy2013.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 12
238 243 218
1347 1347
1158
15001402
1149
1648 1623
1214
1066 1086
926
150 159 169
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by Age Range
24 & under 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 & over
# % # %
24 years & under 5 2.1% -25 -10.3%
25-34 years 0 0.0% -189 -14.0%
35-44 years -98 -6.5% -253 -18.0%
45-54 years -25 -1.5% -409 -25.2%
55-64 years 20 1.9% -160 -14.7%
65 years & over 9 6.0% 10 6.3%
Grand Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
FY2011-FY2012 FY2012-FY2013
Age Range
Headcount Change by Age Range
4. Employees by Age Range Employees by age range are the number of employees as viewed by calculating their age from the month and year of birth recorded in employee personnel data, displayed within 10 year ranges. This information provides a view of the age distribution within the organization and the impact of cultural or age-related trends and diversity awareness. Information about workforce age may also help identify the portion of employees who may be planning retirements in the near future in order for the organization to maximize career succession planning and minimize institutional knowledge loss. Retirement data are covered more in depth in the Staff Workforce and Analytic Trends (SWAT) Retirement report. More information on age and the cultural impact is covered in a biannual Generations in the Workplace report within the SWAT series. Between FY2011 and FY2013, the greatest number and percentage of staff employees were in the 45 to 54 age group, with the least populated group being employees age 65 and over. The proportion of each age group to total staff remained relatively the same each year.
Seventy-three percent of staff were within the three age groups 25 to 34, 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 in FY2013; a slight decrease from the combined 75% in FY2012.
Employees within the age range 55 to 64 continued to represent about 19% of the workforce each year.
Employees in the lower and upper end of the ranges – those being 24 years and under or 65 years and over - continued to be the smallest age groups and represented 5% and 3% of the workforce, respectively during the three years.
The reduction of 1,115 in overall employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce across the six age groups. Employees 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 years of age had the largest decrease in headcount, while employees 65 years and over increased headcount.
Employees at or below the age of 34 had a net decrease during the three years of 209 employees and represented 19% of the total reduction.
Employees in the middle of the pack, ages 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 years, represented 70% of the total reduction during the three years, with a loss of 785 employees.
Employees 55 to 64 years were 13% of the total reduction.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 13
439
743644
14921357
1031
12231151
919968 915828
718 682
519547 501421
319 299 252
243 212 2200
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Years
Employees by Years of Service
Less than 2 2 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15
16 to 20 21 to 25 26 to 30 More than 30
# % # %
Less than 2 years 304 69.2% -99 -13.3%
2 to 5 years -135 -9.0% -326 -24.0%
6 to 10 years -72 -5.9% -232 -20.2%
11 to 15 years -53 -5.5% -87 -9.5%
16 to 20 years -36 -5.0% -163 -23.9%
21 to 25 years -46 -8.4% -80 -16.0%
26 to 30 years -20 -6.3% -47 -15.7%
More than 30 years -31 -12.8% 8 3.8%
Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
Headcount Change by Years of Service
FY2012-FY2013FY2011-FY2012
Years of Service
5. Employees by Years of Service Employees by years of service are the number of employees as viewed within eight groups defining the years of work accumulated by an employee and recorded as Longevity Months in employee personnel records. Longevity Months include employment at Texas A&M University as well as other Texas state agencies if reported by the employee and verified by the university’s payroll office. This information provides awareness of employee subject-matter or institutional knowledge that could be used for mentoring or career advancement. As employees enter or exit the workforce, understanding the level of knowledge gained or lost by the university could help identify cross-training or business continuity needs. Service time also represents added benefits to the employee through annual leave accruals and supplemental monthly compensation, known as longevity pay; both are indicative of the value conferred upon greater knowledge and loyalty to state employment. Between FY2011 and FY2013, the greatest number and percentage of staff employees had between two and five years of service and nearly half had six to twenty years of service. The proportion of each service group to total staff changed slightly with the total reduction in headcount.
Employees with less than two years of service were 7% of staff in FY2011 and 13% by FY2013.
Employees with two to five years of service were 25% of staff in FY2011 and 21% by FY2013.
The three groups totaling six to twenty years of service were 49% of the workforce in FY2011 and 47% by FY2013.
Employees with 21 years or more of service were 19% of staff in FY2011 and 18% by FY2013. The reduction of 1,115 in overall employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce across the eight service time groups. As of FY2013, all but one service group, employees with more than 30 years of service, reduced headcount. Employees with two to five years of service saw the greatest reduction.
Employees with less than two years of service had a 205 net increase due to the increase between FY2011 and FY2012.
Employees with two to five years of service were 41% of the reduction in staff.
Fifty-eight percent (643 employees) of the total reduction in headcount was in the three service groups of six to 10, 11 to 15 and 16 to 20 years of service.
Employees in the two groups 21 to 25 and 26 to 30 years of service reduced in headcount by a combined 193 employees and represented 17% of the total reduction.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 14
276 26027
2128 2095
1365
416 416 360
1627 1616 1599
872 860 896
538 524 501
92 89 86
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by Education Level
<High Sch High Sch/GED Assoc Bach
Master Doctor Special Prof
# % # %
Less than High School -16 -5.8% -233 -89.6%
High School or GED -33 -1.6% -730 -34.8%
Associate 0 0.0% -56 -13.5%
Bachelor -11 -0.7% -17 -1.1%
Master -12 -1.4% 36 4.2%
Doctorate -14 -2.6% -23 -4.4%
Special Professional -3 -3.3% -3 -3.4%
Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
Headcount Change by Education Level
FY2011-FY2012 FY2012-FY2013
Education
6. Employees by Education Level Employees by education level are the number of employees as viewed by their highest-attained level of education identified from employee personnel records. Employee education is self-reported data at time of hire, or any time later when a decree is successfully earned. This information provides a view of the learned knowledge inherent in the organization to help identify educational strengths and academic opportunities for employees, as well as career advancement potential. As an institution of higher education, management’s awareness of the educational attainment by employees and support for furthering educational opportunities demonstrates organizational culture and core values supporting the university's primary mission. The outsourcing action had a significant impact on the makeup of employees by education level as most employees transitioned to the external vendor were in positions that did not require post-secondary education. During FY2011 and FY2012, the greatest number and percentage of staff employees had a high school degree or GED equivalent; by FY2013, the largest group was employees with a Bachelor’s degree. As the workforce size changed due to the outsourcing action, the proportion of employees with education beyond high school increased.
Employees at or below a high school degree or GED equivalent were just over 40% of the workforce in FY2011 and just under 29% by FY2013.
Employees with some level of post-secondary education were 71% of the workforce in FY2013; up from 60% the previous two years.
Nearly 31% of staff employees possess a graduate-level degree in FY2013; up from 25% the previous two years.
The reduction of 1,115 in overall employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce as viewed by education. Employees without post-secondary education had the greatest reduction in headcount each year and represented the majority of total change.
Nearly 91% of the total reduction in staff was of employees at or below a high school degree or GED equivalent.
Employees with undergraduate degrees represented 7.5% of the total reduction.
Employees with graduate-level degrees had a net total loss of 19 employees to an increase of employees with a Master degree in FY2013.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 15
553 551 569
2826 2835 2794
881 798663
375 355 351397 372185
917 949
272
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by EEO Job
Exec Prof Sec Cler Tech Para Skilled Service
# % # %
Executive/Admin/Mgr -2 -0.4% 18 3.3%
Professional Non-Faculty 9 0.3% -41 -1.4%
Secretary/Clerical -83 -9.4% -135 -16.9%
Technical/Paraprof. -20 -5.3% -4 -1.1%
Skilled Craft -25 -6.3% -187 -50.3%
Service/Maintenance 32 3.5% -677 -71.3%
Total -89 -1.5% -1026 -17.5%
Headcount Change by EEO Job Category
EEO Job Category
FY2011-FY2012 FY2012-FY2013
7. Employees by EEO Job Category & Management Span Employees by Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) job category are the number of employees as viewed within the six staff-related job groupings using EEO definitions assigned to each position’s title. EEO job categories are a coding system defined by federal agencies and used to identify job positions in broad descriptors based on scope of work and duties. This provides a view of the level of responsibility, knowledge and skills integral to the organization’s mission, and is also used for various federal and state reporting. A seventh EEO job category, Faculty, is not represented in this report. Between FY2011 and FY2013, the greatest number and percentage of staff employees continued to be in Professional Non-Faculty positions. The outsourcing action had a significant impact on the types of jobs at the university as a majority of eliminated positions did not require formal degrees and many involved manual skilled labor with on the job education or training. As the workforce size changed, the proportion of employees in jobs with administrative, technical or office-based duties and formal education increased.
Executive/Administrative/ Managerial were about 9% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY2012, and 12% in FY2013.
Professional Non-Faculty positions which were about 48% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY2012 represented nearly 58% of staff employees in FY2013.
Secretarial/Clerical remained between 13% and 14% of the workforce in the three years.
Skilled Craft positions were 6% of the workforce the first two years and 4% by FY2013.
Service/Maintenance represented about 16% of the workforce in FY2011 and FY2012, and less than 6% in FY2013.
The reduction of 1,115 in overall employee headcount between FY2011 and FY2013 differently impacted the workforce across the six job categories. Most of the reduction was in Service/ Maintenance, Secretary/Clerical, and Skilled Craft positions. It is worth noting that in higher education, as well as private industry, the changing nature of work place expectations and skill requirements, along with increased use of technology for automating administrative functions, may account in part for the overall declining trend of Secretary/Clerical positions and the increase in Professional Non-Faculty.
Service/Maintenance accounted for nearly 58% of the total reduction, with a net loss of 645 employees over the course of the three years.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 16
Exec11.8%
Prof57.8%
Sec Cler13.7%
Tech Para7.3%
Skilled3.8%
Service5.6%
Employees by EEO Job Category - FY2013
217 213 210420 432 431
5312 5215
4193
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2011 2012 2013
# Em
plo
yee
s
Fiscal Year
Employees by MSO Code
Manager Supervisor Other
Secretary/Clerical represented nearly 20% of the total reduction (218 employees), not solely attributable to the outsourcing action as this category has seen a continued declined in headcount for several years.
Skilled Craft decreased by 212 employees, representing 19% of the total reduction.
Professional Non-Faculty had a net loss of 32 employees (2.9%) over the three years, as some positions related to administration of the outsourced positions were also transitioned to the external vendor.
Considering only the current reporting period in FY2013, Professional Non-Faculty is the largest single group of employees by EEO job categories, one in which employees must generally possess post-secondary degrees or a combination of formal education and experience. Skilled Craft and Service/Maintenance represent the smallest two of six job categories.
Executive/Administrative/ Managerial and Professional Non-Faculty combined total 3,363 employees, nearly 70% of all positions at the university.
Secretarial/Clerical and Technical/Paraprofessional are the third and fourth largest groups with about 14% and 7% of the workforce respectively.
The two smallest groups combined, Service/Maintenance and Skilled Craft, represent just over 9% of the workforce.
Another view the workforce is through the Manager, Supervisor, Other (MSO) codes. The MSO codes are associated with each position based on scope of responsibility as defined by the Texas State Auditor’s Office (SAO) and reported in the state’s compensation system. Management-to-staff ratios can be used to determine an organization's span of control, i.e., the number of employees who directly report to a single manager or supervisor. A correlation generally exists between the span of control and the number of layers within an organization and may help identify efficiencies or improvements in distribution of work.
Employees in manager or supervisor positions represented just over 13% (641) of staff in FY2013, an increase from the previous two years of 11%.
Employees classified as Other, i.e., non-management or supervisory, represented about 87%
of the staff in FY2013, a decrease from about 89% the previous two years.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 17
Texas higher education institutions are statutorily required to comply with a minimum management-to-staff ratio of one manager or supervisor for no fewer than 11 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The FTE calculation is based on total hours paid during a quarter and includes all employee types. According to the SAO’s summary report on Full-Time Equivalent State Employees for the Quarter Ending August 31, 2012, the management-to-staff ratio for all state employees decreased in the past five years from one manager or supervisor for every 13.1 employees to 12.7 employees.
Texas A&M’s management-to-staff ratio using the State’s FTE calculation for the first quarter of FY2013 was one manager or supervisor for every 19.12 employees.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 18
8. Interesting Facts in FY2013
98% of staff work full-time.
4,702 staff work in full-time budgeted positions; 132 work part-time. This gives insight into the number of staff performing duties at full workload or the extent to which wage or temporary employees may or may not be augmenting services. This also provides a view of the number of employees who may be paying for a larger portion of insurance benefits out-of-pocket because employees budgeted at less than 100% effort pay significantly more.
71% of staff have a
college
degree
3,442 employees possess an associate, bachelor, master, doctorate or special professional degree.
FEMALE – 57%
MALE – 43%
According to the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau, Texas has a gender composition of 50.4% Female, 49.6% Male.
5% Vets
240 staff employees are Veterans. According to a U.S. Department of Labor report, “The Veteran Labor Force in the Recovery” November 3, 2011, 11.8 million veterans are working or looking for work, accounting for 7.7% of the U.S. labor force.
Staff employees contribute to a global presence and experience for students, faculty and visitors.
72 countries outside of the U.S.
are represented in the staff workforce.
In FY2013, 607 employees reported their nationality being other than from the United States, with Mexico, China, Canada and India having the greatest presence of all other countries.
12 Average years of
state service of staff employees
1,953 staff began employment prior to 2000, with 2,881 since then.
44
Median age of staff employees
3,952 employees reported their home residence in Brazos County, with 40.9% in Bryan, 58.8% in College Station, 0.3% in other communities.
Most A&M staff enjoys short commutes to work in comparison with other Texas cities. According to U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Demographic Profile, mean travel time to work in Texas is 24.8 minutes and less than 17 minutes for Bryan or College Station.
10.93 Number of students for every 1 staff
*Texas A&M University Data and Research Services, Enrollment Profile Fall 2011, 2012 and 2013.
High School or Less
29%
Post Secondary
Degree40%
Graduate Level Degree
31%
Education Level of Employees - FY2013
24 & under 4.5%
25-34 years 24%
35-44 years 23.8%
45-54 years 25.1%
55-64 years 19.2%
65 & over 3.5%
82% in Brazos County
-2.5%
0.88%
-1.5%
1.49% 0.73%
-17.5%
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
0.88%1.49%
0.73%
-2.5%-1.50%
-17.51%
FY2010-FY2011 FY2011-FY2012 FY2012-FY2013
Student EnrollmentStaff Employment
1960
1980
2000
2% 38% 60%
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 19
APPENDIX 1 Overview Texas A&M University is the flagship institution of The Texas A&M University System, with $1 billion budget and an endowment that typically ranks in the top five nationally among public universities. Playing a key role in the day-to-day operations of the university are about 4,800 staff that provide administrative service and support to future, current and former students, as well as faculty, researchers and campus visitors. The Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends is a series of reports developed by the Texas A&M University Human Resources organization to provide human resource-related information on budgeted staff employees at Texas A&M University–College Station and Qatar. The reports include metrics on a variety of demographic and position-related data, relevant metrics, trends and commentary, and are provided to university management to increase awareness of the make-up of their organization, recognize efficiencies and take advantage of opportunities to build a productive and successful organization. The report series will include: Demographics; Generations in the Workplace; Leave Benefits: Recruitment; Retirement; Compensation; Training and Development; and, Turnover. Scope of Demographics Report
Data are a snapshot of relevant information at October 31 for fiscal year 2013, and at November 30 for fiscal year 2011 and 2012.
Data are for Part 02 ADLOC’d active budgeted staff (non-faculty) positions and incumbent employees in an active regular or working retiree status.
Data for employee, position, title, organizational hierarchy and any other relevant data are from The Texas A&M University System DataWarehouse.
Data presented in this report are for the university as a total and further displayed for numerical counts by Executive-level reporting units and, if shown, Division/College level units.
Executive-level reporting units include the colleges, divisions, departments, centers and/or other units that organizationally report directly to one of the eight units listed below: 1) President 2) Executive Vice President and Provost – Academic Affairs 3) Vice President – Administration 4) Vice President – Marketing & Communications 5) Vice President – Research 6) Vice President – Student Affairs 7) Vice President & CFO – Finance 8) University Accounts (temporary executive level as a result of FY2012 outsourcing of dining,
maintenance, custodial and landscape services)
Division/College level reporting includes all the departments, centers and/or other units that
organizationally report directly to the Division/College.
Methodology for Demographic Report
Beginning with the FY2013 report, data are captured as of October 31; the date change did not materially affect data comparison between fiscal years.
Headcount number change is calculated as the count of one fiscal year minus the count of the previous fiscal year and percentage change is based on the head count from the previous fiscal year.
Employee staff (non-faculty) classification is determined by the primary position’s title and its assigned Faculty Rank Code.
Full-time status is defined as employment in a position budgeted at 100% effort, typically 40 hours per week; part-time is defined by any number less than 100%.
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 20
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 1 Number of Employees University-wide by Executive Level
President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 0 5949
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 0 5860
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 21
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 2 Number of Employees by Gender by Executive Level
Gender President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
Male 151 1216 813 14 54 238 72 2558
Female 90 1924 621 15 89 436 216 3391
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
Male 156 1186 827 12 55 236 68 2540
Female 89 1864 641 15 82 423 206 3320
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
Male 160 1207 377 9 49 171 68 16 2057
Female 88 1880 165 15 92 318 194 25 2777
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 22
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 3 Number of Employees by Race/Ethnicity by Executive Level
Race/Ethnicity President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
White 203 2319 732 25 121 455 214 4069
Black 24 161 236 2 6 119 28 576
Hisp 9 362 418 2 9 75 37 912
Asian 4 237 20 6 14 3 284
Am Ind 1 14 8 3 2 28
Hw 1 2 1 4
Two+ 8 4 2 3 17
Unkn 38 16 1 4 59
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
White 204 2243 740 23 113 438 207 3968
Black 27 174 264 2 6 118 26 617
Hisp 9 348 421 2 10 75 33 898
Asian 4 229 21 7 16 3 280
Am Ind 1 12 4 2 1 20
Hw 1 2 1 4
Two+ 10 3 3 3 19
Unkn 33 15 1 5 54
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
White 207 2267 394 18 113 381 193 9 3582
Black 28 175 55 3 9 49 27 13 359
Hisp 9 367 71 2 10 34 34 19 546
Asian 3 211 11 6 13 4 248
Am Ind 1 11 4 1 2 1 20
Hw 1 1 2
Two+ 14 2 1 4 2 23
Unkn 42 5 2 5 54
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 23
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 4 Number of Employees by Age Range by Executive Level
Age Range President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
24 & under 15 135 52 1 5 24 6 238
25-34 67 819 228 3 26 159 45 1347
35-44 70 805 346 10 37 154 78 1500
45-54 60 760 509 6 42 177 94 1648
55-64 22 532 263 7 33 147 62 1066
65 & over 7 89 36 2 13 3 150
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
24 & under 10 141 59 1 7 19 6 243
25-34 68 776 265 4 30 161 43 1347
35-44 72 743 322 9 39 144 73 1402
45-54 59 754 506 4 32 177 91 1623
55-64 30 545 278 7 27 140 59 1086
65 & over 6 91 38 2 2 18 2 159
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
24 & under 19 164 16 3 8 8 218
25-34 67 778 111 4 34 128 36 1158
35-44 71 732 118 8 44 107 69 1149
45-54 53 734 172 5 31 120 83 16 1214
55-64 34 566 103 3 26 106 63 25 926
65 & over 4 113 22 4 3 20 3 169
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 24
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 5 Number of Employees by Years of Service by Executive Level
Years of Service President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
Less than 2 18 225 137 2 13 40 4 439
2 to 5 76 812 326 8 33 177 60 1492
6 to 10 49 675 263 4 29 144 59 1223
11 to 15 38 493 234 5 28 111 59 968
16 to 20 18 339 222 5 23 72 39 718
21 to 25 19 281 143 2 8 63 31 547
26 to 30 14 160 80 1 4 39 21 319
More than 30 9 155 29 2 5 28 15 243
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
Less than 2 35 357 242 3 21 73 12 743
2 to 5 69 728 313 7 27 156 57 1357
6 to 10 48 617 258 4 28 139 57 1151
11 to 15 36 467 220 4 27 107 54 915
16 to 20 20 331 209 5 19 63 35 682
21 to 25 18 264 129 1 7 56 26 501
26 to 30 12 150 73 1 3 40 20 299
More than 30 7 136 24 2 5 25 13 212
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
Less than 2 48 415 87 2 22 51 19 644
2 to 5 52 683 119 7 27 99 44 1031
6 to 10 55 597 95 1 29 94 45 3 919
11 to 15 33 493 95 5 26 106 65 5 828
16 to 20 21 316 71 4 20 51 27 9 519
21 to 25 20 268 44 2 10 32 31 14 421
26 to 30 9 167 19 1 1 32 13 10 252
More than 30 10 148 12 2 6 24 18 220
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 25
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 6 Number of Employees by Education Level by Executive Level
Education Level President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
<High Sch 1 21 208 1 45 276
High Sch / GED 34 807 864 5 45 245 128 2128
Assoc 10 243 93 6 40 24 416
Bach 122 1030 203 15 44 119 94 1627
Master 63 546 52 9 16 157 29 872
Doctor 9 455 1 21 44 8 538
Special Prof 2 38 13 10 24 5 92
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
<High Sch 1 13 204 42 260
High Sch / GED 34 757 892 5 40 245 122 2095
Assoc 11 238 98 8 39 22 416
Bach 118 1034 206 13 43 111 91 1616
Master 67 528 54 9 19 154 29 860
Doctor 11 441 2 19 44 7 524
Special Prof 3 39 12 8 24 3 89
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
<High Sch 13 4 10 27
High Sch / GED 31 736 300 3 40 118 110 27 1365
Assoc 10 234 53 1 6 36 18 2 360
Bach 128 1078 133 12 42 111 93 2 1599
Master 66 565 44 8 22 159 32 896
Doctor 10 418 3 22 41 7 501
Special Prof 3 43 5 9 24 2 86
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 26
APPENDIX 2 – Detail Data
Item 7 Number of Employees by EEO Job Category by Executive Level
EEO Job Category President
Exec V.P. &
Provost -
Acad Affairs V.P. - Admin
V.P. - Mar &
Comm
V.P. -
Research
V.P. -
Student
Affairs
V.P. & Cfo -
Finance
Univ
Accounts Total
FY2011 241 3140 1434 29 143 674 288 5949
Exec/Admin/Mgr 33 330 33 16 19 84 38 553
Prof Non-Faculty 173 1895 199 13 91 310 145 2826
Secr/Clerical 21 582 108 4 82 84 881
Tech/Paraprof 1 287 37 21 23 6 375
Skilled Craft 8 14 331 44 397
Service/Maint 5 32 726 8 131 15 917
FY2012 245 3050 1468 27 137 659 274 5860
Exec/Admin/Mgr 32 330 35 16 17 87 34 551
Prof Non-Faculty 178 1892 225 11 84 303 142 2835
Secr/Clerical 21 511 111 4 71 80 798
Tech/Paraprof 1 274 33 23 21 3 355
Skilled Craft 8 12 306 46 372
Service/Maint 5 31 758 9 131 15 949
FY2013 248 3087 542 24 141 489 262 41 4834
Exec/Admin/Mgr 34 340 29 12 22 96 35 1 569
Prof Non-Faculty 184 1965 123 12 89 281 139 1 2794
Secr/Clerical 19 459 34 4 74 71 2 663
Tech/Paraprof 1 283 26 18 19 3 1 351
Skilled Craft 6 12 152 9 6 185
Service/Maint 4 28 178 8 10 14 30 272
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 1 Number of Employees by Gender by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
Gender
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
Female 88 99 26 108 136 88 125 83 192 28 293 1266
Male 32 29 8 38 72 126 57 32 255 39 112 800
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
Female 78 70 25 98 129 80 114 79 196 31 297 1197
Male 28 28 9 41 68 122 50 31 244 39 105 765
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
Female 80 60 27 104 129 88 119 81 188 35 296 1207
Male 27 28 9 40 72 118 54 38 236 47 111 780
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
Gender
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
Female 36 54 19 20 12 231 115 45 3 123 658
Male 24 18 6 2 6 81 62 14 1 202 416
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 1088
Female 61 44 22 17 11 260 115 14 3 120 667
Male 31 15 3 1 6 89 55 6 1 214 421
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
Female 19 44 19 14 17 303 110 20 3 124 673
Male 17 13 4 8 99 61 8 1 216 427
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 28
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 2 Number of Employees by Race/Ethnicity by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
Race/Ethnicity
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
White 91 57 29 118 169 168 145 101 290 51 325 1544
Black 7 2 11 6 5 7 4 16 3 17 78
Hisp 8 54 2 13 22 13 24 7 28 5 36 212
Asian 12 3 4 10 25 5 2 96 7 22 186
Am Ind 1 2 1 1 3 8
Hw
Two+ 1 1 1 1 1 5
Unkn 13 1 1 16 1 1 33
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
White 81 56 30 108 156 161 126 94 280 54 326 1472
Black 10 13 7 3 7 5 14 4 18 81
Hisp 6 35 2 14 20 12 25 7 31 5 35 192
Asian 7 2 4 12 23 4 2 98 6 18 176
Am Ind 1 1 1 1 3 7
Hw
Two+ 1 1 1 1 1 5
Unkn 6 1 1 2 1 16 1 1 29
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
White 83 56 30 112 162 166 133 99 270 58 335 1504
Black 9 2 10 5 3 8 4 15 5 17 78
Hisp 8 29 3 16 28 14 24 12 29 3 35 201
Asian 5 2 4 4 21 6 2 89 12 16 161
Am Ind 1 1 1 1 1 5
Hw
Two+ 1 1 1 1 3 7
Unkn 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 17 3 3 31
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
Race/Ethnicity
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
White 47 54 15 18 15 194 128 43 2 259 775Black 4 7 4 1 1 30 14 6 1 15 83
Hisp 6 6 3 3 1 72 28 5 1 25 150
Asian 2 2 3 1 12 5 2 24 51
Am Ind 1 2 1 2 6
Hw 1 1
Two+ 2 1 3
Unkn 1 1 1 2 5
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 1088
White 71 41 14 14 15 208 124 15 3 266 771
Black 6 10 3 1 1 38 14 4 1 15 93
Hisp 10 5 3 3 85 26 24 156
Asian 2 1 5 1 14 3 27 53
Am Ind 1 1 1 2 5
Hw 1 1
Two+ 2 2 1 5
Unkn 1 1 2 4
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
White 26 34 15 9 21 237 123 23 3 272 763
Black 4 11 2 2 2 43 15 2 1 15 97
Hisp 4 7 2 2 1 102 25 23 166
Asian 2 3 4 1 14 4 22 50
Am Ind 1 1 1 1 2 6
Hw
Two+ 2 2 1 2 7
Unkn 3 3 1 4 11
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 29
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 3 Number of Employees by Age Range by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
Age Range
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
24 & under 2 9 1 7 4 4 14 4 18 2 37 102
25-34 29 25 5 44 48 32 51 27 148 23 117 549
35-44 33 35 17 43 50 56 44 20 113 23 98 532
45-54 28 31 7 30 55 72 45 28 85 11 95 487
55-64 24 25 4 18 43 43 21 34 69 7 48 336
65 & over 4 3 4 8 7 7 2 14 1 10 60
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
24 & under 5 2 6 3 1 9 3 10 5 35 79
25-34 22 26 5 35 46 34 45 27 147 22 111 520
35-44 27 22 16 41 46 47 41 20 114 26 96 496
45-54 26 23 8 34 53 68 43 25 85 10 96 471
55-64 24 23 5 21 41 46 20 30 65 4 56 335
65 & over 2 2 2 8 6 6 5 19 3 8 61
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
24 & under 4 3 1 5 5 2 14 4 9 4 40 91
25-34 26 20 7 43 38 36 43 29 137 25 101 505
35-44 28 17 12 38 42 46 47 26 106 30 106 498
45-54 25 25 10 35 55 66 40 27 80 16 86 465
55-64 23 19 6 21 50 43 22 26 72 4 65 351
65 & over 1 4 2 11 13 7 7 20 3 9 77
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
Age Range
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
24 & under 2 1 1 11 10 8 33
25-34 6 19 4 6 1 99 44 29 1 61 270
35-44 10 20 8 7 4 83 37 11 3 90 273
45-54 19 20 8 2 6 59 51 8 100 273
55-64 20 10 5 5 6 54 30 7 59 196
65 & over 3 2 2 6 5 4 7 29
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 108824 & under 4 45 9 4 62
25-34 16 9 4 6 2 105 39 14 2 59 256
35-44 19 17 6 3 2 77 28 1 2 92 247
45-54 28 16 10 3 5 61 55 3 102 283
55-64 24 12 4 4 8 57 33 2 66 210
65 & over 5 1 1 2 4 6 11 30
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
24 & under 2 1 58 8 4 73
25-34 4 13 4 3 4 115 44 16 1 69 273
35-44 4 13 6 5 3 87 20 1 3 92 234
45-54 12 16 8 2 6 73 54 6 92 269
55-64 14 10 3 3 9 59 37 5 75 215
65 & over 2 3 2 3 10 8 8 36
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 30
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 4 Number of Employees by Years of Service by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
Years of Service
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
Less than 2 6 31 2 6 13 17 14 66 5 29 189
2 to 5 29 37 6 38 47 42 46 27 137 27 125 561
6 to 10 23 26 9 45 31 36 37 25 87 17 81 417
11 to 15 16 13 6 22 35 29 36 20 50 8 75 310
16 to 20 15 12 6 15 30 30 17 15 38 2 34 214
21 to 25 14 3 2 12 26 31 15 16 31 6 32 188
26 to 30 8 1 3 4 13 18 8 4 19 1 16 95
More than 30 9 5 4 13 11 9 8 19 1 13 92
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
Less than 2 9 20 4 13 25 16 20 4 93 12 43 259
2 to 5 23 24 5 34 41 39 38 23 115 24 119 485
6 to 10 20 21 8 40 31 38 29 24 84 15 75 385
11 to 15 16 13 5 19 27 26 30 20 47 9 74 286
16 to 20 14 12 6 15 26 29 19 15 37 3 32 208
21 to 25 15 3 3 11 26 27 14 15 26 5 32 177
26 to 30 4 1 3 3 11 17 8 3 19 14 83
More than 30 5 4 4 10 10 6 6 19 2 13 79
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
Less than 2 11 9 6 18 15 24 19 15 79 22 71 289
2 to 5 24 24 6 39 39 33 42 20 110 21 97 455
6 to 10 19 14 7 40 37 36 35 25 72 16 73 374
11 to 15 18 18 7 15 30 29 26 20 60 10 73 306
16 to 20 9 13 5 17 24 25 19 18 40 3 33 206
21 to 25 13 4 3 9 29 27 15 8 23 7 30 168
26 to 30 6 1 2 2 17 19 11 6 20 2 18 104
More than 30 7 5 4 10 13 6 7 20 1 12 85
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
Years of Service
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
Less than 2 2 1 1 16 3 6 7 362 to 5 7 16 5 4 2 91 39 25 62 251
6 to 10 12 21 7 6 4 87 43 13 2 63 258
11 to 15 9 10 6 4 3 59 26 9 1 56 183
16 to 20 10 11 3 5 2 27 20 1 46 125
21 to 25 8 4 2 3 2 20 15 3 1 35 93
26 to 30 5 7 1 1 5 19 1 26 65
More than 30 7 2 4 7 12 1 30 63
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 1088
Less than 2 4 4 1 58 9 5 17 98
2 to 5 16 13 6 3 2 103 35 7 1 57 243
6 to 10 13 14 6 5 3 81 37 5 2 66 232
11 to 15 17 9 4 4 3 60 26 3 55 181
16 to 20 16 10 4 4 2 22 18 47 123
21 to 25 13 3 3 2 2 14 15 1 34 87
26 to 30 7 5 1 1 6 19 28 67
More than 30 6 1 4 5 11 30 57
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
Less than 2 5 11 2 1 73 12 4 18 126
2 to 5 4 11 5 6 4 111 30 8 1 48 228
6 to 10 3 5 7 1 3 82 38 7 2 75 223
11 to 15 7 11 6 2 6 65 29 4 57 187
16 to 20 5 8 1 2 1 35 15 1 42 110
21 to 25 7 5 2 3 1 20 16 4 1 41 100
26 to 30 1 2 4 10 18 28 63
More than 30 4 4 5 6 13 31 63
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 31
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 5 Number of Employees by Education Level by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
Education Level
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
<High Sch 7 2 11 20
High Sch / GED 32 58 5 33 86 38 46 25 80 6 135 544
Assoc 8 8 2 8 22 15 14 10 24 2 48 161
Bach 33 36 12 44 59 65 66 39 101 25 132 612
Master 26 13 10 41 22 45 35 31 32 26 37 318
Doctor 20 3 5 18 19 50 20 9 204 8 26 382
Special Prof 1 3 2 1 1 1 4 16 29
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
<High Sch 2 2 9 13
High Sch / GED 27 34 5 32 76 32 46 24 75 8 139 498
Assoc 8 9 2 7 24 13 14 9 26 2 48 162
Bach 33 38 11 39 53 62 55 39 98 29 126 583
Master 20 9 10 41 26 47 33 28 36 19 37 306
Doctor 17 3 6 19 18 47 15 9 199 11 25 369
Special Prof 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 18 31
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
<High Sch 3 2 8 13
High Sch / GED 21 27 5 32 80 31 43 24 84 6 141 494
Assoc 7 8 2 8 24 13 15 7 29 2 49 164
Bach 36 30 13 41 57 65 60 45 92 32 129 600
Master 27 14 13 44 26 49 35 31 30 24 34 327
Doctor 15 3 3 18 14 48 19 10 184 17 26 357
Special Prof 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 20 32
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
Education Level
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
<High Sch 1 1
High Sch / GED 7 14 5 6 5 91 54 7 1 73 263
Assoc 3 1 1 1 23 14 2 37 82
Bach 16 21 8 10 9 118 85 16 1 134 418Master 7 25 6 4 1 75 22 24 1 63 228
Doctor 25 11 5 1 2 5 1 8 1 14 73
Special Prof 2 1 2 4 9
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 1088
<High Sch
High Sch / GED 17 12 5 6 5 88 52 1 73 259
Assoc 5 2 1 19 15 34 76
Bach 28 15 7 7 8 162 79 5 2 138 451
Master 15 21 7 4 1 73 21 11 1 68 222
Doctor 26 9 5 1 2 7 3 2 1 16 72
Special Prof 1 1 1 5 8
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
<High Sch
High Sch / GED 4 9 2 3 6 91 52 1 74 242
Assoc 2 1 19 12 1 35 70
Bach 9 16 8 9 10 194 83 8 2 139 478
Master 3 20 8 2 6 90 22 13 1 73 238
Doctor 15 10 4 3 8 2 5 1 13 61
Special Prof 3 1 1 6 11
Staff Workforce Analytics and Trends January 31, 2013 Demographics FY2013 Page 32
APPENDIX 3 – Supplemental Data for Academic Affairs
Item 6 Number of Employees by EEO Job Category by Division/College
Executive VP & Provost / Colleges
EEO Job
Col:
Agriculture
And Life
Sciences
Col: Archi-
tecture
Col: Bush
School Of
Gov't &
Public Srv
Col:
Education
Col:
Engineering
Col: Geo-
sciences
Col: Liberal
Arts
Col: Mays
Business
School Col: Science
Col: Tamu
Qatar
Col:
Veterinary
Medicine Total
FY2011 120 128 34 146 208 214 182 115 447 67 405 2066
Exec/Admin/Mgr 7 12 10 22 6 8 12 31 16 18 14 156
Prof Non-Faculty 84 52 22 108 168 176 132 70 327 46 124 1309
Secr/Clerical 21 63 2 16 24 12 35 14 48 3 82 320
Tech/Paraprof 6 9 16 3 51 151 236
Skilled Craft 2 1 1 2 3 4 13
Service/Maint 2 30 32
FY2012 106 98 34 139 197 202 164 110 440 70 402 1962
Exec/Admin/Mgr 7 11 11 22 9 9 13 29 16 18 16 161
Prof Non-Faculty 75 50 21 104 155 169 120 68 328 51 128 1269
Secr/Clerical 18 36 2 13 23 6 30 13 44 1 79 265
Tech/Paraprof 4 9 16 1 48 147 225
Skilled Craft 1 1 1 2 2 4 11
Service/Maint 1 2 28 31
FY2013 107 88 36 144 201 206 173 119 424 82 407 1987
Exec/Admin/Mgr 7 12 12 23 11 8 15 33 15 24 16 176
Prof Non-Faculty 82 53 22 107 159 177 128 76 314 57 131 1306
Secr/Clerical 13 22 2 14 21 5 29 10 39 1 73 229
Tech/Paraprof 3 9 14 1 51 159 237
Skilled Craft 1 1 1 2 3 3 11
Service/Maint 1 2 25 28
Executive VP & Provost / Non-College Divisions
EEO Job
Div: AA
Admin-
istration
Div: Asso
Prov
Undergrad
Pgm & Acad
Srv
Div: Assoc
Prov & Dean
Of Faculties
Div: Assoc
Prov-Grad
Studies
Div: Assoc
Vp External
Affairs
Div: Assoc
Vp For Acad
Services Div: Library
Div: Vice
Provost For
Acad Affairs
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov -
Instit
Diversity
Div: Vp &
Assoc Prov-
Info
Technology Total
FY2011 60 72 25 22 18 312 177 59 4 325 1074
Exec/Admin/Mgr 35 21 8 6 2 61 2 18 1 20 174
Prof Non-Faculty 20 37 15 13 13 158 54 32 3 241 586
Secr/Clerical 5 14 2 3 3 93 119 9 14 262
Tech/Paraprof 1 50 51
Skilled Craft 1 1
Service/Maint
FY2012 92 59 25 18 17 349 170 20 4 334 1088
Exec/Admin/Mgr 44 19 6 5 2 61 3 5 2 22 169
Prof Non-Faculty 41 30 17 10 13 193 51 14 2 252 623
Secr/Clerical 7 10 2 3 2 95 114 1 12 246
Tech/Paraprof 1 48 49
Skilled Craft 1 1
Service/Maint
FY2013 36 57 23 14 25 402 171 28 4 340 1100
Exec/Admin/Mgr 20 19 4 4 7 72 3 10 2 23 164
Prof Non-Faculty 14 31 17 10 15 243 54 17 2 256 659
Secr/Clerical 2 7 2 3 87 112 1 16 230
Tech/Paraprof 1 45 46
Skilled Craft 1 1
Service/Maint