Deltaport Third Berth Project 2007 Issue Tracking and

Deltaport Third Berth Project

2007 Issue Tracking and Response Table Post-Certification and Construction Phase

January 1 to December 31, 2007 (DCLC: Issue submitted to Deltaport Third Berth Project Community Liaison Committee) 1 of 78

# Source Issue VPA Response

ENVIRONMENT GENERAL

1 Harold Grabowski Feb. 15, 2007 e-mail May 31, 2007 Open House (2) Louisa Silva Dec. 30, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding environmental impacts (potential air and water pollution).

VPA is deeply committed to environmental sustainability and to designing and building the Deltaport Third Berth Project in a way that respects and protects the local environment. The project’s EA Application was prepared in compliance with both the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the BC Environmental Assessment Act, and with the involvement of key VPA staff and over 30 specialist consultants. The EA Application examined a wide variety of factors relating to potential environmental, socio-economic and cultural effects. The findings of several environmental studies by the VPA resulted in a reduction of the project footprint to minimize impacts on the environment and community. VPA will also spend approximately $25 million on the implementation of over 150 key commitments to protect the environment, including programs such as the Habitat Compensation Plan, the Adaptive Management Strategy, the Marine Mammal Monitoring Program and the Construction Environmental Management Plan.

2 May 31, 2007 Open House (2)

Interest in affected wildlife and methods used to mitigate effects on wildlife.

The construction of the Deltaport Third Berth is a marine project. The wildlife that utilize marine habitat with the potential to be affected by construction are marine mammals (See Marine Environment: Issue No. 4 response below for details on marine mammals), coastal waterfowl and shorebirds. A list of bird species that have the potential to occur at Roberts Bank, their respective conservation status and




# Source Issue VPA Response

records of previous observations is available in the DCLC Top 10 Wildlife Questions and VPA Responses document online at http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/community_liaison_committee.html#docs VPA is conducting daily environmental monitoring during construction that includes observations for birds and their behavior within the Project area including an assessment of disturbance from construction activities. If observations show that birds are being disturbed then construction methods may be changed or altered to reduce potential environmental effects. To date, a diversity of bird species are using the Deltaport Project area in the same manner as prior to construction. In addition, bi-weekly field surveys using the same methods used during the environmental assessment are being conducted within the intercauseway area.

3 Bernita Iversen Oct. 3, 2007 e mail

Request on behalf of Delta Council for information regarding construction of perimeter dykes.

Following construction of containment dyke #1 for the DP3 Project, water drained through the dike at a rate that did not keep up with the falling tide. As a result of this draining, some localized channels formed adjacent to the containment dyke. To mitigate this issue, fill was placed against the inside of the perimeter dike to act as a filter/barrier layer and excessive water was pumped from the terminal fill area behind the containment dike and transported to the designated ocean disposal site. Following these mitigation measures, the localized channels stabilized. VPA mapped the channels and continues to monitor their state.




4 Roger Emsley

Nov. 4, 2007 e-mail

Questions regarding DP3 wood pile placement 1) Was an application for approval of these

works made to FREMP?

2) Is this expected to cause additional disruption to wildlife, either from the work in placing the piles or from residual impacts?

3) What steps are being taken to ensure no birds become trapped in the area where the piles are being installed?

4) Have DFO and Environment Canada been

consulted, given approval?

1) An application to FREMP was not required as

the work area is within the project area already authorized by DFO for the third berth construction activities. FREMP does not issue project approvals but rather provides coordinated environmental assessment recommendations that are incorporated into approving agencies authorizations, permits or approvals. As the DP3 project triggered a federal comprehensive study and BCEAA Environmental Assessment, the environmental review agencies on FREMP (DFO, EC and MoE) conducted their environmental assessment as part of the harmonized federal-provincial review process

2) The installation of wooden piles will result in no additional disruption to fish, marine mammals, wildlife and birds or other habitat. Further, there are no residual impacts as the wooden piles are being placed underwater within the footprint of the new terminal fill area covered by DFO authorization.

3) There is no possibility of birds being trapped in the area where the wooden piles are being placed. The area is presently underwater and is not enclosed.

4) The Fisheries Act Authorization condition for pile driving for DP3 applies, as do all applicable best management practices, to the installation of wooden piles. DFO and Environment Canada have been notified of the works through the




5) Will the wooden piles be left in place? If yes, will they be below the mud line?

6) This is during the peak time for wintering waterfowl including snow geese – what is the expected impact on these populations and what mitigation measures are in place?

7) What is the impact on shorebirds – what mitigation measures?

8) What are the potential fishery impacts – has authorization under the fisheries act been obtained?

9) What is the potential impact on crab populations in the area?

10) What additional damage will be done to undersea vegetation in the area?

construction environmental monitoring program. Please note that Environment Canada does not have an approval or permit function in regards to pile driving in marine waters.

5) The wood piles will be left in place to adequately densify the soil. They are being driven close to the existing mud line and the upper tips will later be buried under several meters of terminal fill.

6) Driving wooden piles produces very little acoustic noise either at the surface or underwater and there are negligible effects on waterfowl and coastal seabirds. The work area is located within the new terminal fill area which was not – based on the environmental assessment – nor is currently, being used by over-wintering or migratory waterfowl. Regular bird surveys are being conducted as part of the construction environmental monitoring program

7) The current work area is sub-tidal and therefore not utilized by shorebirds. Further, the wooden pile installation is occurring during the winter, outside of shorebird migration windows.

8) There is no additional disruption to fish or fish habitat, including ovigerous Dungeness crabs. The conditions of the Fisheries Act Authorization issued to the VPA apply to the installation of wooden piles. There are no additional residual impacts, damage or disturbance as the wooden piles are being placed in subtidal water within the footprint of the new terminal fill area.

9) Refer to the response to question #8.

10) Refer to the response to question #8.




5 Arthur David Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Support for VPA environmental stewardship. Comment noted.

MARINE ENVIRONMENT

1 Stacy Rogers, March 3, 2007 e-mail

Request for information regarding Marine Mammal Monitoring Program.

Program summary and details provided.

2 May 29, 2007 Open House

Concern regarding mid-ocean de-ballasting, and how the Port could verify that it was accomplished. Stated that only about 1-in-10 vessels are sampled.

The Port of Vancouver brought in a mandatory mid-ocean exchange program for ballast water in 1997. Each and every vessel was checked to see if a mid-ocean exchange was done and the relative risk of the source of the ballast water. In 2006, Transport Canada implemented Ballast Water Control and Management Regulations and has assumed the responsibility for enforcing compliance. The Port of Vancouver continues to board each vessel at the time of call to seal the bilge and inspect the ships logs.


Culverts need to be placed along the causeway. VPA is assuming that this comment is referring to the placement of culverts through the Roberts Bank causeway to allow water flow into the intercauseway area. When VPA was assessing potential habitat compensation options for DP3, the introduction of culverts through the causeway was evaluated with DFO but the potential benefits of improved fish access to the intercauseway area did not justify the potential impacts associated with the introduction of dendritic channels. Subsequent juvenile salmon monitoring has shown abundant presence of juvenile salmon in the intercauseway area.




4 Roger Emsley

June 29, 2007 e-mail

Interested in the extent of studies on three pods of resident orcas and measures to protect them from construction, port operation and ship traffic? Interest in consultation with the US regarding orcas.

The objective of the DP3 marine mammal monitoring program is to monitor marine mammal presence within the Project area during construction and avoid, reduce or mitigate potential environmental effects, particularly as they apply to killer whales. In addition, VPA has committed to assessing killer whale presence at Roberts Bank during initial operation of the third berth, including evaluation of ongoing measures to reduce potential environmental effects. This will help ensure the long-term viability of resident killer whale populations and sustain their genetic diversity and cultural continuity by reducing potential human-induced effects, including noise and pollutants, and sustaining their habitat and prey. The DP3 marine mammal monitoring program objectives are consistent with the DRAFT National Recovery Strategy for Northern and

Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca); (Resident Killer Whale Recovery Team 2005). The VPA has retained Jacques Whitford and JASCO Research Ltd. to conduct this program based on a phased monitoring plan to ensure that potential effects associated with elevated acoustic source levels from construction activities are avoided or minimized and to confirm that operational effects are minimal. VPA will also work with British Columbia Coast Pilots Ltd. to develop an education and awareness program about marine mammals, and specifically killer whales, such that pilots of deep-sea vessels transiting to and by Roberts Bank steer away from observed marine mammal pods when vessel safety is not compromised. This program will be in place when the third berth is




operational in late 2009 and will be reported on in the DP3 Killer Whale Study. VPA will evaluate vessel speeds of container vessels transiting to and by Roberts Bank and assess the potential for marine mammal interactions and the potential risk of marine vessel mammal collisions when ships approach the Roberts Bank port area. This work will be completed prior to operation of the third berth and will also be reported on in the DP3 Killer Whale Study. The marine mammal monitoring program has been prepared based on consultation with Canadian regulators and scientists but has also incorporated emerging science from US programs and scientists. Due to the extent of the information that will be collected, such as the underwater ambient acoustic work and killer whale audiogram modeling, VPA intends to share the results of the marine mammal monitoring program and killer whale studies with Canadian and US scientists working on killer whale programs in Georgia Strait. For more information on these programs, please see the DCLC Top 10 Wildlife Questions and VPA Responses document online at http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/community_liaison_committee.html#docs

5 Roger Emsley June 29, 2007 e-mail

Interest in measures to protect Dungeness crabs and their breeding.

Work on the Project involving the seabed, foreshore, and immediately adjacent uplands will adhere to DFO fisheries sensitive periods to avoid impacts to fish and fish habitat: The DFO fisheries sensitive periods are: a. No dredging is permitted in waters less than -5 m

CD deep from March 1 to August 15 for the




protection of juvenile salmon unless the works area is adequately isolated from fish bearing waters to the satisfaction of DFO;

b. From October 15 to March 31 there shall be no works conducted which would result in a significant disturbance to the seabed of outer Roberts Bank which is situated in water greater than -5 m CD deep at daily low water for the protection of adult ovigerous female Dungeness crabs; and

c. Any works proposed within the above referenced work windows will require DFO review and approvals, which require specific underwater survey information and mitigation.

In addition, when the construction dykes were enclosed to isolate the work area from fish-bearing water, a salvage of fish, including Dungeness crabs, within the enclosed dyke, was undertaken over a period of a few weeks. Salvaged fish and crabs were relocated to suitable habitat within the intercauseway area.


Interest in measures to mitigate underwater noise during dredging.

See above responses regarding crabs and killer whales.

7 Mike Owen August 8, 2007 e-mail

Were GPS co-ordinates given to the tug and barge disposal crews as part of the disposal at sea plan? Was the disposal that affected the BCTC transmission line from bottom dumping scows or

The GPS plans and co-ordinates were given to the Contractor. The plan shows the precise location of the authorized disposal area including the Ocean Disposal Permit that gives precise directions to dispose of the material below the 40-metre depth contour. These are requirements of the disposal at sea permit. A bottom-dump Scow was used.




from flat barges with either rubber tired wheel loaders or excavators on board to discharge the material? Was this more than 1 load? If yes is there an amount of known discharges (loads) in the incorrect location? If so how many? What was the estimated cubic meters or tonnes discharged? Was inclement weather a factor in this disposal in the wrong location? Is there a secondary disposal area available to the Contractor for weather or other reasons? Who was the Contractor? Interest in the cause of the error and whether it was an intentional cost-saving measure. Why is the disposal site so close to these very necessary submerged cables? Which Government Agency is responsible for the selection of underwater disposal sites in BC?

There was more than one load. The independent investigation will determine the exact timeframes and number of loads. The investigation and assessment will determine the exact amount. No. No. Deltaport Constructors Ltd. is the contractor for the third berth project. The independent investigation will determine the cause. However, it is unlikely to be an intentional cost-saving measure because the approved location is closer to Deltaport than the unapproved location. The boundary of the disposal site is more than 1 km from the underwater cables. The centre of the disposal area is more than 2 km from the cables. Environment Canada.




8 Nov. 24, 2007 Open House Attendee

Concern over introduction of invasive species in ballast water.

VPA has a Ballast Water Management Plan in place to reduce the possibility of invasive marine organisms. The introduction of invasive species on containers and ship structures are of prime concern to many federal departments as well as the VPA. The federal government has established a number of working groups to look at invasive species across Canada:

• Aquatic Invasives (Fisheries and Oceans Canada)

• Terrestrial Plants (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) Terrestrial Animals (Environment Canada)

TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT


Power line should be buried to prevent them from killing birds.

Bird diverters have been placed along the Roberts Bank causeway power line to make the high-tension line more visible to birds to reduce bird mortality.


Interested in mitigation measures implemented with respect to barn owls.

VPA will support appropriate environmental stewardship programs to place barn owl nest boxes in areas preferably towards Brunswick Point, where they are less vulnerable to traffic from Deltaport Way and Highway 17. The work will be initiated through barn owl management planning, either through a Barn Owl Management Team involving agencies such as CWS and MOE and other interested agencies and parties, or an ad hoc equivalent. This work is scheduled for early 2008, as it is a commitment pertaining to the operation of DP3.

3 John Hatfield Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over project impacts to over-wintering wildlife habitat.

Impacts to terrestrial wildlife, including habitat, were studied as part of the environmental assessment process. Twenty-seven non-migratory, at-risk species were surveyed and only two birds and six small mammals were considered to have a moderate to high




likelihood of occurrence in the study area and therefore could be potentially impacted by the Deltaport Third Berth Project. Potential impacts are discussed in detail in Section 12.7 of the Project’s Application for an Environmental Assessment. The project construction area is not impacting critical over-wintering wildlife habitat.

COASTAL GEOMORPHOLOGY


Concern regarding erosion in Point Roberts caused by larger ships passing through. Request that this be assessed by the VPA.

VPA has looked at erosion at Roberts Bank as part of a coastal geomorphology study, that included waves generated by passing ships. The study determined that there was not significant erosion from waves generated from passing vessels. VPA is also undertaking a long-term coastal geomorphology study that will look at any changes in coastal zone processes.


Concern with impact of the dendritic channel. The assessment of the dendritic channel is included in the longer-term coastal geomorphology study that is being conducted during the Adaptive Management Strategy.

WATER FOWL AND COASTAL SEABIRDS

1 Janice Sigfusson May 10, 2007 e-mail to DCLC May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern with impacts to migratory birds. Potential impacts to migratory birds during construction are addressed in the detailed Construction Environmental Management Plan. Environmental monitoring is being conducted to confirm that any impacts to water fowl and coastal sea birds are avoided or completely mitigated. Potential effects to the marine environment and migratory birds are primarily those associated with a loss of habitat, which is being addressed by the Deltaport Third Berth Project's Habitat Compensation Program, Adaptive Management Strategy (monitoring and management of the Roberts Bank intercauseway




ecosystem). Habitat compensation projects include: • East causeway enhancements including removal of

land to create aquatic habitat for fish and coastal seabirds

• Log removal and salt marsh restoration to increase productive capacity for fish and fish habitat

• Caisson habitat openings within the dock structure that provide surface area and refuge for marine organisms

• Subtidal rock reef for increased fish and coastal seabird habitat productivity

• Dendritic channel modifications to allow stabilized sediments and eel grass beds to re-establish themselves within areas that have been modified by drainage channels

• 7.5 hectares of off-site compensation created in partnership with Ducks Unlimited and the Pacific Salmon Foundation.

2 Roger Emsley June 252007 e-mail Nov. 24, 2007 Open House Attendee

Interest in the status of osprey nest relocation project.

Environmental monitoring has confirmed that the osprey did not occupy the relocated nest during this nesting season although both a male and a female osprey have been observed at the Roberts Bank intercauseway area. It appears from the field observations that bald eagles used the relocated nest, which is in fact a navigation aid, as a perch point during the spring. VPA is assessing ways to dissuade use of the nest as a perch for bald eagles and still be attractive for osprey.


Interest in VPA data on sandpipers, and whether they are being tracked.

VPA conducted bird surveys from September 2003 to August 2004, along the north and south sides of the Roberts Bank causeway, and around the tip of the




Roberts Bank container facility. CWS has also conducted bird surveys since 2003, along the shoreline from Brunswick Point to the tip of the ferry causeway. The combined VPA and CWS data sets are considered to be a baseline characterization of the composition of coastal seabird and shorebird species at the project site prior to the expansion of DP3. The surveys included the important western sandpiper (Calidris mauri) spring migration that occurs at Roberts Bank. Although western sandpipers do not presently have special conservation status, the baseline work conducted by VPA’s technical consultants included more intensive bird surveys during the spring migration period. It was determined that western sandpipers do not use the DP3 Project area either as significant feeding or resting habitat. However, given the significance of Roberts Bank area as a migratory stopover for the western sandpiper, VPA is monitoring the spring migration during DP3 construction to augment the ongoing scientific research that is being done by the Canadian Wildlife Service and the Centre for Wildlife Research at Simon Fraser University Bird studies are presently being conducted along the south side of the Roberts Bank causeway, north side of the ferry causeway and the intervening shoreline at the head of the inter-causeway area. One monitoring event is completed every two weeks. Observations are being made at a frequency of twice each day, as daylight permits, or on two consecutive days within a 3-day monitoring window. Observations are made once during a daily high tide and once during a daily low tide.




4 Roger Emsley


Interest in status of nest surveys to be done prior to construction.

Prior to start of marine construction nest surveys were conducted and it was confirmed that the only nest site within the proposed construction area was the osprey nest, for which VPA applied and received a permit to relocate.


Interest in measures to monitor and mitigate construction impacts on great blue herons and their breeding. Interest in any impacts identified during construction.

Great Blue Herons are included in the coastal seabird and shorebird survey noted above. There is no nesting or active breeding in the Project area but the Roberts Bank intercauseway area is an important feeding area for herons. Herons are continuing to feed up to the newly created shoreline.


Interest in any impacts to brant geese identified during construction.

As part of the ongoing construction monitoring, VPA observed that brant geese were not using areas of shoreline that they have used in previous surveys and were instead using areas of suitable habitat in the Roberts Bank intercauseway area. Several surveys were conducted including some joint inspection with CWS and MOE staff. Brant behaviour and habitat utilization will continue to be monitored throughout project construction and during the first year of operation of Deltaport Third Berth.

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (AMS)

1 May 31, 2007 Open House Wilma Haig e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007

What is the Adaptive Management Strategy (AMS)?

The Adaptive Management Strategy is a science-based approach to monitoring and managing the Roberts Bank intercauseway ecosystem. The key components are geomorphology/oceanography, surface and water quality, sediment quality, eel grass and benthic communities. The goal of the AMS is to provide early detection of potential changes in the inter-causeway ecosystem so that significant negative environmental trends attributable to DP3 can be prevented or mitigated. The AMS details the commitments that the




Port would undertake to evaluate, prevent or mitigate those trends. An independent Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) was established to provide scientific and technical advice and recommendations to the AMS.

HABITAT COMPENSATION PLAN (HCP)


Interest in whether the Habitat Compensation Plan has been developed to the point that VPA can guarantee no net loss of fish habitat.

A habitat compensation program has been prepared that satisfies the requirements of the Fisheries Act Section 35(2) Authorization. A component of the Authorization requires long-term habitat monitoring to verify and validate that the habitat is functioning as intended and whether “no net loss” or “net gain” of productive fish habitat has been achieved. The Fisheries Act Section 35(2) Authorization for DP3 requires a habitat monitoring program that varies with each habitat compensation feature and includes quantitative surveys and assessments (during years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8; or as otherwise noted in the monitoring program) and annual qualitative surveys and assessments on years when the quantitative surveys are not conducted. The Authorization has provisions for extending the monitoring period and/or requiring alternative works if DFO feels that this is appropriate. In addition, the Authorization requires that VPA fund a third party, mutually agreed to by DFO and the Port, to audit the monitoring reports against the conditions of the Authorization to ensure that its terms and conditions are met.




2 Roger Emsley

June 29, 2007 e-mail Wilma Haig e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007

Interest in the Habitat Compensation Plan and when the plan will be available to DCLC.

The habitat compensation requirements for DP3 are described in the DFO authorization which is available through the CEA registry at http://www.ceaa.gc.ca/050/DocViewer_e.cfm?DocumentID=16097 The Habitat Compensation Plan for the Deltaport Third Berth Project will provide approximately 20 hectares of on-site compensation projects and 7.5 hectares of off-site compensation. Habitat compensation projects include: • East causeway enhancements including removal of

land to create aquatic habitat for fish and coastal seabirds

Status: initial construction works are expected to proceed later this year. Baseline habitat monitoring work to measure habitat performance is under way and is mostly complete. • Log removal and salt marsh restoration to increase

productive capacity for fish and fish habitat Status: Log removal has commenced. • Caisson habitat openings within the dock structure

to provide increased surface area and refuge for marine organisms

Status: will be incorporated into the caissons structure when they are constructed. • Subtidal rock reef for increased fish and coastal

seabird habitat productivity Status: Complications in construction dredging work has meant that equipment intended for rock placement has been available.Rock placement is planned to proceed in the spring subject to fisheries windows. Baseline monitoring work has been completed.




• Sandbar stabilization to facilitate re-establishing of eel grass beds within areas that have been modified by dendritic channels

Status: after extensive consultations with DFO, a plan has been finalized to proceed with a limited pilot project, with a larger project to proceed if the pilot is deemed successful. The pilot will be undertaken next summer. Baseline monitoring will be conducted in the spring. • 7.5 hectares of off-site compensation created in

partnership with Ducks Unlimited and the Pacific Salmon Foundation.

Status: An engineering assessment of Rose-Kirkland Island is underway and will be completed within a few weeks. Baseline work will be undertaken this winter and early spring 2008 to determine the islands' current use as fish habitat. Fisheries and Oceans Canada issued the Fisheries Act Authorization approving the Habitat Compensation Plan in December 2006. Compliance with the entire Fisheries Act Authorization, including the Habitat Compensation Plan, will be independently audited.

AIR QUALITY

1 Andrea Janssen Feb. 14, 2007 e-mail May 29, 2007 Open House May 31, 2007 Open House (2) Wilma Haig

Concern with air quality impacts. The VPA and terminal operator TSI are committed to limiting emissions associated with the Deltaport Third Berth Project construction, as well as general port operations. Air quality actions and commitments include: • Construction-related exhaust and dust, and

construction-related emissions are being reduced through: use of ultra-low sulphur fuel, after-treatment devices, optimal maintenance and




e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007 Maurice Fernandes, Anthony Longoz Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

operation of equipment and, adherence to speed limits, road watering and covering of fine materials.

• The VPA has agreed to fund an ambient air quality monitoring station in Delta, scheduled to be installed Fall 2007.

• The VPA implemented an anti-idling program for all container trucks in September 2006 and extended this program to terminal operations in January 2007.

• The VPA required that fill materials for the marine construction be imported by water, thereby eliminating 600,000 one-way truck trips on local roads.

• TSI commenced use of ultra-low sulphur fuel in cargo handling equipment in September 2006. TSI also implemented the use of biofuels in terminal equipment in June 2006 to further reduce emissions.

• TSI has completed testing a diesel electric hybrid rubber tire gantry crane (RTG). This crane is now in operation at TSI's Vanterm container terminal, located in the Burrard Inlet. Two diesel electric RTG's will be in operation at Deltaport by Fall 2007.

• TSI has switched to using biodiesel in all equipment and vehicles with diesel engines at both its terminals (Deltaport and Vanterm, located in Burrard Inlet). The goal is to reduce terminal equipment air emissions by 30% by 2007. TSI is the first terminal operator in Canada to implement such a significant emissions reduction program.

While a number of programs have been undertaken by port tenants, the shipping industry and regulatory agencies, VPA is pursuing a number of initiatives to




reduce emissions from port related activities including: • Implementation of Differentiated Harbour Dues

Program on April 1, 2007 to provide incentives and recognize ships using cleaner fuels and technologies.

• Working with the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy

• Shore Power: 1) A feasibility assessment for use of shore power at Port of Vancouver cruise ship berths has been completed and we are working on resolving implementation issues with the cruise ship lines and the federal and provincial governments. 2) In Spring 2007, a feasibility study was completed for shore power at Deltaport's Third Berth 3) Through the Differentiated Harbour Dues Program, gathering of information on vessels calling the Port of Vancouver that are equipped with shore power that will provide input into local assessments 4) Shore power infrastructure provisions that will allow for future installation with minimum disruption to terminal operation have been incorporated into Centerm, Vanterm container terminals and eventually into the Deltaport Third Berth.

• Actively supporting federal government ratification of International Maritime Organization's (IMO) MARPOL 73/78's Annex VI, Regulations for the Prevention

• Mandatory reservations for trucks to alleviate congestion and line ups.




• Under Truck License System, trucks accessing the Port must undergo and pass random AirCare On-Road emission opacity testing and safety inspections by the Ministry of Transportation.

A more detailed list of Port Air Emissions Strategies are described in the Integrated Air Emissions Reduction Program for the Port of Vancouver: Actions to Address Air Quality and Climate Change available at http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/air_quality/


Interest in the air quality standards with which VPA complies. Interest in the specifics of VPA policies and practices for continuous air quality improvement and specific emission mitigation measures that VPA is implementing, including implementation dates.

The Port of Vancouver is working hard to reduce air emissions of criteria contaminants, air toxics and greenhouse gases through development of a data baseline, improving operational efficiency, technological innovation and supporting regulatory change. Reducing our emissions now and as we grow will help to maintain good air quality and reduce the impacts of climate change for future generations. The various policies, practices and initiatives including the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy are described in detail in the Integrated Air Emissions Reduction Program for the Port of Vancouver: Actions to Address Air Quality and Climate Change dated August 2007. The Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Draft is a three ports collaborative initiative to reduce emissions associated with the VPA, Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma and is currently going through consultation with stakeholders. The VPA falls under federal jurisdiction and is therefore subject to federal air quality standards and objectives including those under the Canada Wide Standards

(CWS) and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act

(CEPA). The CWS were developed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, which includes




participation and administration by the federal, provincial and territorial governments. CEPA is administered by Environment Canada. Discharges to air, land and water within federal port jurisdiction are authorized pursuant to the Canada Marine Act (CMA) by port authorities. Additionally, through airshed management planning processes, local and regional governments including the GVRD are developing their own ambient air quality objectives that are used to help manage airshed-specific air quality. In terms of discharges, Section 5 of the Port Authorities

Operations Regulations under the CMA prohibits anything that has or is likely to have an adverse effect on soil, air or water quality unless otherwise authorized by the port authority. The CMA as a whole is administered by Transport Canada. Regardless of jurisdiction, through its commitment to continuous improvement in terms of reducing emissions of criteria air contaminants, air toxics and greenhouse gases, the VPA clearly recognizes that standards and objectives are not considered levels to be polluted up to.


Strict air quality standards need to be demonstrated by the project; air quality needs to be shown to be getting better.

Strict air quality performance objectives have been implemented to reduce air emissions during construction and operations as part of the VPA’s commitment to build DP3. These commitments for construction include:

• Using on-road (low sulphur diesel, where practical for all Project site based equipment that are capable of using such fuels




• Use of diesel particulate matter filters to reduce particulate matter on construction equipment (where practical and when fuel quality permits)

• Us of post 1996 shore based construction equipment and vehicles to reduce emissions on PM, hydrocarbons and Nox

The Port’s Integrated Air Emissions Reduction Program for the Port of Vancouver (http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/air_quality/) outlines strategies for marine vessels, terminals, trucks and rail. VPA has committed to fund the installation of an air quality station in Delta. The technical working group chaired by GVRD with participation from Corporation of Delta, TFN, Environment Canada and VPA will determine the location for the air quality monitoring station.

4 Steve Kinsey Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over ship compliance with VPA measures intended to address air quality issues. VPA board should provide staff with the regulation and enforcement tools to document and ban ships that negatively impact air quality and noise levels. Document top 10% of worst ship offenders regarding air quality and noise.

While a number of programs have been undertaken by port tenants, the shipping industry and regulatory agencies, VPA is pursuing a number of initiatives to reduce air emissions from port tenants and ensure compliance with these initiatives including: • Implementation of Differentiated Harbour Dues

Program on April 1, 2007 to provide incentives and recognize ships using cleaner fuels and technologies.

• Working with the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy

• Actively supporting federal government ratification of International Maritime Organization's (IMO) MARPOL 73/78's Annex VI, Regulations for the Prevention




Additionally, the VPA is actively participating in the BC Marine Vessel Air Quality Work Group, whose other members include Environment Canada, Transport Canada, Ministry of Environment, Metro Vancouver, BC Ferries and the BC Chamber of Shipping among others. The group is developing emission inventories and cooperates by exchanging information and analyzing options for reducing emissions. Earlier this year, the BC Chamber of Shipping released the results of a year long local, activity based emission inventory for ocean going vessels developed in collaboration with the VPA, Environment Canada and Metro Vancouver. This inventory, along with those being led by Metro Vancouver will help to better assess and manage port related diesel (particulate matter) PM and other emissions. In regards to noise, VPA is working with the Terminal Operator and shipping lines to identify and minimize problematic and nuisance noise.


Concern regarding whether diesel emissions are being monitored in the area around the port and compared to regional emissions.

VPA is leading the development of a local port land-related activity-based emission inventory including trucks, rail and terminal equipment. The inventory will cover the jurisdictions of the Port of Vancouver, Fraser Port and North Fraser Port Authorities. This inventory will include emission estimates for a number of air quality parameters including diesel PM and will be the most accurate port emission inventory ever conducted in Canada. The inventory is being developed in collaboration with Environment Canada and the Greater Vancouver Regional District. The results of the inventory will be used to benchmark emissions and




identify priorities for future reduction programs and initiatives. Concurrently, the VPA is developing an emission inventory of port-related fugitive emissions including for example dust and vapours. Earlier this year, the BC Chamber of Shipping released the results of a year long local, activity based emission inventory for ocean going vessels developed in collaboration with the VPA, Environment Canada and the GVRD. Together these inventories, along with those being led by the GVRD will help to better assess and manage port related diesel PM and other emissions.


Concern regarding the burning of heavy bunker oils by ships entering the Port of Vancouver jurisdiction and the impact on air quality (particulate matter) and human health. Suggested that ships should be shut down at dock and placed on a form of ground-based power.

See above.


Impact to air quality of idling trains. The rail sector is reducing emissions through fleet renewal, co-production, train handling, rail lubrication, freight care productivity improvements and locomotive shutdown systems. The rail sector is also testing hybrid switch locomotive or other technologies. VPA is in the process of agreeing upon a strategy to lower emissions, called the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy. These standards include air quality standards for rail operations, achieved through short-term projects (by 2010) and longer term projects (by 2015). Long-term goals for rail operations include reducing PM in trains by 90%.

8 Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over local air emissions from idling trucks.

Through the Truck Licensing System (TLS), the Port is committed to developing a safer, cleaner, more




Attendee sustainable container truck fleet to service the Port’s container facilities. Coming into effect January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008 the Port will enforce a new mandatory idle reduction provision on and around port property for container trucks: a maximum 3 consecutive minutes idling in a one hour period Further, the following new safety and environmental provisions will be phased in to the TLS starting January 1, 2008:

• All trucks to be tested and pass opacity standards equivalent to AirCare On Road (ACOR):

o 55% for 1990 & older o 40% for 1991 & newer

• Trucks that achieve 10% get one year exemption

Beginning March 31, 2008 all trucks older than 1989 will be banned from port property unless granted an exception due to clean retrofits. Beginning January 1, 2009, all trucks are to be tested and pass opacity standard of 20%, repeated annually thereafter. Also beginning in January 1, 2009, the Port will prohibit access to container trucks older than 1994.


Concern regarding ship emissions related to larger ships making more frequent port calls. Interest in emission forecasts compared to 2003.

This question was specifically addressed in the Environmental Assessment for DP3 Chapter 13, Air Quality and Chapter 23, Cumulative Effects Assessment. VPA retained the firm Moffat Nichol Ltd. in 2004 to conduct a vessel forecast for the Project. Moffat Nichol is an engineering firm with recognized expertise in planning, designing and building container terminals in North America. The 2003 Deltaport database of over




327 ship calls provided a trend of vessel sizes for the Vancouver market as it existed during that time period. Moffat Nichol conducted a forecast for 2011, the assumed date of DP3 operation based on two potential scenarios. The first scenario assumed an average volume of 2458 twenty foot equivalent (TEU) handled per vessel in 2003 at Deltaport, and a growth rate of 3.3% per year in average vessel size. Based on Scenario 1 Moffat Nichol estimated that there would be 389 vessel calls at Deltaport in year 2011. A second scenario was also evaluated based on the arrival of one 8000TEU vessel per week on a hub port call in which 50% of the vessel is discharged and loaded. This would generate a total vessel count of 306 vessels. The actual number of forecasted vessels used for the projected 2011 DP3 air quality assessment was 393 vessels. As a result of the navigational vessel assessment, four additional ship calls were added. The intent was to provide for a conservative overestimate of emissions to maintain a “precautionary approach” when assessing emissions and the effects on human health and the environment. Presently, Deltaport is averaging about 300 vessel calls per year based on 2005 and 2006 container terminal activity. The EA Application provides a summary of the emissions for the project operation scenario compared to the local study area (LSA) and regional study area (RSA).


Interest in VPA’s objectives for PM 2.5 and how it plans on achieving these objectives.

VPA is committed to continuous improvement in terms of reducing port-related emissions including PM2.5, to help counteract increases in emissions related to growth. The Integrated Air Emissions Reduction




Program for the Port of Vancouver highlights some of the many initiatives underway and planned that contribute to reducing emissions. One example is the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy, a three ports collaborative effort to reduce related emissions. The VPA, Port of Seattle and Port of Tacoma are currently in consultation with stakeholders on the proposed strategy. The GVRD developed air quality objectives for PM 10 and PM 2.5. These objectives were under development in 2003/04 and accepted by the GVRD Board in October 2005, after the submission of the Deltaport Third Berth application. When VPA reassessed the air quality assessment released for public review in November 2005 the GVRD objective was selected for evaluating predicted PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations for the Deltaport Third Berth Environmental Assessment on the basis that there were objectives for both daily and annual averaging periods (CWS only has a24-hour standard for PM 2.5) and the GVRD objective was the most stringent objective or standard presently in Canada or US.


In 2005, VPA committed to installing a permanent air quality monitoring station. When will this be in place?

A Delta Air Quality Monitoring Technical Working Group was formed consisting of staff from Corporation of Delta, Environment Canada, Greater Vancouver Regional District, Tsawwassen First Nation and the Vancouver Port Authority. The Working Group is chaired by the GVRD. The purpose of the Delta Air Quality Monitoring Technical Working Group is to facilitate discussion, information exchange and sharing of technical expertise amongst participating agencies in order to provide a sound basis from which to make the




best possible decision on future air quality monitoring in Delta that satisfies the VPA commitment and, where possible, the needs of other Technical Working Group members. Discussions have progressed to the point where some preferred sites have been identified.


In 2005, VPA indicated that short sea barge shipping was under active consideration – as a way to reduce emissions. What progress has VPA made on this initiative?

VPA is continuing to explore short sea shipping as an alternative to reduce local/regional truck trips and the amalgamation of the three Lower Mainland port authorities is anticipated to facilitate this initiative.

13 Roger Emsley June 29, 2007 e-mail Wilma Haig e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007 Nov. 24, 2007 Open House Attendees (3)

Interest in status of shore power initiative. Shore power is actively being explored as one option for reducing ocean going vessel auxiliary engine emissions at dock. In Spring 2007, a feasibility study was completed for container ship shore power at Deltaport’s Third Berth. This study recommended that a staged approach be taken to fully implement shore power at this facility, recognizing that there is a two year lead time to full implementation. The first and second stages would involve incorporation of preliminary infrastructure as DP3 is constructed, and conceptual allocation of space for additional dockside infrastructure respectively. A staged approach would allow for international standards to be developed and vessels equipped to those standards to come to the DP3 facility, ensuring that the maximum benefits from shore power could be realized. Feasibility of implementing shore power for cruise vessels at Canada Place has also been examined in detail, and the VPA has been working with BC Hydro, cruise lines and terminal operators to resolve outstanding issues with a view toward implementation.




Additionally, shore power infrastructure provisions that will allow for future installation with minimum disruption to terminal operation have already been incorporated into Centerm and Vanterm container terminals. And, through the Differentiated Harbour Dues Program, the VPA is gaining a better understanding of what vessels equipped for shore power are calling Port of Vancouver terminals, and what their requirements are.

14. Roger Emsley June 29, 2007 e-mail

Interest in the status of VPA work with GVRD and International Maritime Organization (IMO) towards declaring Vancouver an IMO Sulphur Emission Control Area by 2009.

Canada must develop legislation to support IMO’s Annex VI, Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships prior to ratifying the Annex itself. The federal government has now proposed such legislation and once passed can proceed with ratification. In order for an area to be designated as a SECA, an application must be submitted to the IMO for consideration, clearly demonstrating the need for such a designation. Environment Canada and the U.S. EPA have been developing the information needed to determine whether a case for a North American or West Coast SECA can be made and on what basis, and will submit an application to the IMO for consideration based on the results of their assessments. Since making the initial commitment VPA and the GVRD continue to work with Environment Canada on the SECA application process. VPA is actively supporting the federal government ratification of IMO’s Annex VI, and designation of a North America or West Coast SECA post-ratification. The Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy further supports this.




15 Roger Emsley


Long Beach requires certain vessels to use exhaust control technology and cleaner fuels while at berth – interest in this for Deltaport.

VPA is committed to reducing port-related air emissions that contribute to air quality and climate change, including those from ocean going vessels (OGVs). The VPA takes a multi-pronged approach to reducing emissions, including both mandatory and collaborative initiatives that apply to OGVs and other port-related sources at Roberts Bank and Burrard Inlet such as: • Prohibition of excessive vessel exhaust opacity of

any colour with the exception of steam (water vapour)

• Increased fees for vessels that do not implement eligible emission reduction measures beyond those required by the IMO, through the VPA Differentiated Harbour Dues Program implemented April 1, 2007

• The Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy is designed to ensure good air quality now and in the future by taking a proactive and collaborative approach to reducing emissions, prior development of degraded air quality

• The VPA’s Integrated Air Emissions Reduction Program for the Port of Vancouver: Actions to Address Air Quality and Climate Change will feed into and support the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy.

16 Vic Rivers Sept. 12, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding smoke being emitted from vessel working on the DP3.

VPA has contacted contractors regarding concern and requested the environmental monitors to monitor equipment working on DP3. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.




17 Vic Rivers Oct. 29, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding smoke being emitted from ship operating in DP3 basin.

The marine vessel in question may be the Titan delivering sand from the Fraser River. It is being monitored.

18 Dave Harden Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in opportunity at DP3 to use technology to reduce vehicle emissions.

Opportunities to include new vehicle emission reduction technology are constantly explored. Advanced technology applications, such as radio-frequency identification (RFID) for efficient vehicle tracking to prevent congestion must be installed in trucks as a condition of the VPA’s Truck Licensing System.

NOISE

1 Maurice Fernandes, Anthony Longoz, Steve Kinsey Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over increase in noise. A Noise Management Plan is being implemented by the Port to address noise impacts. This includes procedures for construction activities to meet the intent of Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 to avoid disturbance of the local community with 24 hour - 7 day per week construction periods. The Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 does not have prescribed noise levels but VPA is using the 65 dBA rating which is comparable to other municipal jurisdictions to assess noise levels leaving federal jurisdiction. This includes setting maximum allowable noise emissions for each type of machinery prior to construction to ensure that contractors do not utilize any excessively noisy equipment. VPA also has increased noise mitigation measures for dredging activities. A DP3 information and feedback line - 604.665.9337 - is available to the public. Any noise and lighting concerns will be directed to the appropriate team




member for action and follow-up will be documented. In addition, the Deltaport Third Berth Project Community Liaison Committee will work with the Port during DP3 construction to address noise and lighting issues. The Port will continue to take acoustic readings throughout the construction of the third berth and will also work with all contractors and the community to mitigate project-related noise issues.

2 Don Bennett May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern regarding vibrations and noise from the machinery in Deltaport.

A Noise Management Plan was developed for the construction portion of DP3 to ensure identified mitigation measures are implemented. This includes procedures for construction activities to meet the intent of Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 to avoid disturbance of the local community with 24 hour - 7 day per week construction periods. The Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 does not have prescribed noise levels but VPA is using the 65 dBA rating to monitor noise leaving federal jurisdiction. This includes setting maximum allowable noise emissions for each type of machinery prior to construction to ensure that contractors do not utilize any excessively noisy equipment. If noise is related to DP3 construction, individuals are asked to contact the VPA’s Project Information Line 604-665-9337 with details on the time, type and location of noise.

3 Harold Grabowski Feb. 15, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding socio-economic issues (potential noise and light pollution) resulting from Deltaport Third Berth Project.

The Deltaport Third Berth Project Community Liaison Committee (DCLC) will allow VPA to work directly with members of the community to address issues such as light and noise. Individuals are asked to call the project




information line at 604-665-9337 with details of noise or light issues so VPA can correctly identify the source and determine appropriate mitigation.

4 Ken McNames May 17, 2007

Concern that port noise is ongoing. Suggested installing noise devices to record db level. Concern that terminal operator cannot address rail noise. Suggested electrifying trains, installation of shore power and enforcement of Delta noise by-laws.

VPA has retained BKL Consultants Ltd. to set-up a noise monitoring station this area in addition to the other construction noise monitoring locations that are now in place throughout the Roberts Bank causeway. The station, which will be deployed in late June, will monitor background noise levels the neighbourhood and this data will help the VPA to determine noise sources and levels and whether mitigation measures are necessary. Electric rail line VPA is supportive of new technologies that reduce both the noise and air quality impacts from port related operations. Currently, the terminal does use electric power for the rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGs) that unload and load containers onto trains, however, the infrastructure to modify the Roberts Bank train corridor has significant challenges due to the fact that there are three separate lines utilizing diesel power locomotives. To our knowledge sufficient analysis of this concept has not been undertaken by the railways at this time.

The railways are aware of the noise and air quality concerns related to their operations. VPA will continue to bring issues to the railway's attention and seek ways and means of mitigating operating impacts. Ships docking at Deltaport must hook up to our power

system - no ship generators.




The DP3 project will include the infrastructure for shore power. TSI is just finishing a feasibility assessment on shore power including a survey of ships and power requirements calling on Deltaport now and forecasted into the future. There are no ships currently calling on Deltaport that have the ability to connect to shore power. Further, there are no standards, international or national, in place for either ships or terminals to determine what the power supply/demand should be or a standardized for a ship connection. VPA is working with the Chamber of Shipping through the International Maritime Organization and the American Association of Port Authorities to establish ship to shore power standards. The VPA is collecting information presently on the world-wide fleet of container ships to assist in establishing criteria. Enforce Delta's bylaw - no noise over 65db. A Noise Management Plan was developed for the construction portion of DP3 to ensure identified mitigation measures are implemented. This includes procedures for construction activities to meet the intent of Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 to avoid disturbance of the local community with 24 hour - 7 day per week construction periods. The Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 does not have prescribed noise levels but VPA is using the 65 dBA rating to monitor noise leaving federal jurisdiction. This includes setting maximum allowable noise emissions for each type of machinery prior to construction to ensure that contractors do not utilize any excessively noisy equipment. Noise update provided to resident as originally presented at June 26, 2007 DCLC meeting. Also provided with VPA contact information.




5 Vic Rivers May 28, 2007 e-mail

Interest in the steps being taken in regards to Construction Noise Management Plan to assess and minimize noise during construction. Concern over impacts of construction-dredging noise to date on residents in the community.

A Noise Management Plan was developed for the construction portion of DP3 to ensure identified mitigation measures are implemented. This includes procedures for construction activities to meet the intent of Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 to avoid disturbance of the local community with 24 hour - 7 day per week construction periods. The Delta Noise Control Bylaw No. 1906, 1972 does not have prescribed noise levels but VPA is using the 65 dBA rating to monitor noise leaving federal jurisdiction. This includes setting maximum allowable noise emissions for each type of machinery prior to construction to ensure that contractors do not utilize any excessively noisy equipment. The marine works contractor has been requested to increase sound attenuation measures on their dredge. The contractor has hired a noise consultant to assist and additional silencers will be placed on the dredge equipment.


Interest in what process is in place to ensure that noise by-laws are met at the impacted points as opposed to at source. Interest in the numerical noise levels currently deemed acceptable at impacted points noting much of the noise is low frequency, high energy in nature. Noted that some of the most significant noise appears to be from container lifting frames against the container when they are lowered and would like to know if this is being addressed in the design of lifting equipment.

See above. VPA has retained BKL Consultants Ltd. to set-up a noise monitoring station this area in addition to the other construction noise monitoring locations that are now in place throughout the Roberts Bank causeway. The station, which will be deployed in late June, will monitor background noise levels the neighbourhood and this data will help the VPA to determine noise sources and levels and whether mitigation measures are necessary. The marine works contractor has been requested to




increase sound attenuation measures on their dredge. The contractor has hired a noise consultant to assist and additional silencers will be placed on the dredge equipment. Residents are asked to contact TSI when regular terminal operations or a ship is causing unusually loud noise.

7 Darren Bach Feb. 27, 2007 phone call

Concern regarding construction noise (pile driving).

Informed of noise duration.

8 Darren Bach Feb. 27, 2007 phone call

Concern regarding pulsing generator noise. Dates and times of noises requested.


Concern with truck noise. Noise was studied as part of the Environmental Assessment process for the Deltaport Third Berth Project. The increase in truck traffic as a result of the Project is expected to result in an increase of 1 dBA which is not considered a significant increase in ambient noise at residential noise receptors nearest Deltaport Way and Highway 17.

10 May 29, 2007 Open House May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern regarding train noise resulting from increased rail traffic. Interest in mitigation planned for railways.

Train whistling at railway crossings is an important way to ensure the safety of those who use public railway crossings. The railways are aware of the noise related to their operations. VPA will continue to bring issues to the railway’s attention and seek ways for mitigating operational impacts. Parties affected by rail-related noise will soon have additional recourse through the Canada Transportation Act (CTA). Proposed amendments to Section 95 of the




CTA that deal with noise and vibration issues is awaiting Royal Assent and could come into force in the near future.

11 Margaret Meggy Mar 29, 2007 e-mail

Wanted to know how much noise project dredging would generate.

VPA does not anticipate that dredging will have a significant impact on residents in the area. Notified that dredging is already underway. Advised to contact VPA if noise becomes an issue.

12 Vic Rivers June 25, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding the high level of noise emanating from the dredge (approximately 70-72 decibels at night). Noted that mufflers were not installed and that without mitigation work should cease.

Noise monitors installed at the residence of concerned citizen. Acoustic data will be analyzed over a two-week period. The VPA has been conducting constant noise monitoring since the commencement of the Project and is actively working to mitigate excess noise. VPA and its consultants are working directly with residents that have reported noise concerns and will share the results of investigations and mitigation with them and the DCLC.

13 Darren Bach April 27, 2007 e-mail to DCLC phone call

Concern regarding vibrating/continuous rumbling. Request for decibel meter.

Noise consultants are putting together an acoustic report of current construction and operation noises, which will be made available to the public. VPA is also looking into the feasibility of having noise consultants putting noise meter in the area in order to accurately measure noise. This will allow VPA to use the data collected to help determine appropriate mitigation. Subsequently informed BKL Consultants Ltd. have been retained to set up a monitoring station in late June. Noise provided with Noise update, originally presented at June 26, 2007 DCLC meeting. Also provided with VPA contact information.




14 Vic Rivers

May 29, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding machinery noise at night. Source of operational noise determined and resolved.

15 Diane McNames Sept.27, 2007 DCLC e-mail

Noted a tendency towards louder and louder noises coming from the port in the late evening.

VPA trying to determine if the noise was from Deltaport operations or DP3 construction activities. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.

16 Alison Kinsey October 1, 2007 e-mail

Noise noted late the previous evening VPA trying to determine if the noise was from Deltaport operations or DP3 construction activities. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.

17 Vic Rivers Oct. 29, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding piles being driven at DP3. Concern about noise levels at night resulting from pile driving.

Marine works contractor has been conducting vibro-densification testing of the caisson rock mattress. Testing involves a process similar to steel pile driving to determine the density of placed material. Tests will be carried out periodically throughout the vibro-densicifation period. For the rock mattress, this is expected to be from now until April 2008. In addition, there have been unanticipated problems with the steel sheet pile driving, due to unexpectedly soft soil conditions. The sheet pile is being used to form the north end of the expansion area and the east side of the tug basin and its approach channel in accordance with the requirements of regulatory agencies. As a result of the soft soils, VPA will need to place 100 to 200 untreated wooden piles into soil next




to the sheet pile locations in order to densify the soil and prevent movement when the sheet piles are driven. This work is expected to begin November 5 and continue for two to four weeks. There may be some noise from this but it should be insignificant because the wood piles will be vibrated into place, not driven. This will not take place at night.

18 Vic Rivers December 12, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding pile driving noise, which is continuing to occur early Saturday mornings, as recorded at 7:30 am on December 8, 2007.

This noise appears to be unrelated to the project, as the only project-related sound it could have been was densification testing equipment and a review of related records indicated that type of work did not start until 9:20 am on Saturday, December 8, 2007. There have may been a few hammer blows before that to set-up the equipment, but they would have occurred within 5 minutes of the start time. On site-staff have re-advised DCL about the noise bylaw hours on Saturday mornings (not before 9:00 am).

19 Steve Kinsey June 21, 2007 phone call

Concern regarding loud “droning” or “thumping” as ships move sideways into dock. Concern regarding constant noise, described sound like a ship engine or train idling.

Asked to telephone noise consultants when noises were present, as well as personally record times of loud noises, so consultants could analyze noise data and isolate noise source. VPA and its consultants are working directly with residents that have reported noise concerns and will share the results of investigations and mitigation with them and the DCLC.

20 Diane McNames Nov. 7, 2007 DCLC e-mail

Concern regarding noise coming from the port the previous two nights. Noise described as a constant din.

Information forwarded to the terminal operator. Environmental monitor advised in case the noise is from project equipment.




21 David Ottewell

May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern with frequency of back-up alarms sounding.

The rubber tired and rail mounted gantry cranes are all fitted with audible alarms that are activated with each move in accordance with Labour Canada and Work Safe BC that are activated each time the equipment moves.


Would like to know if a noise sub-committee will be created (as described in Section 25.4 of Appendix E of the EAC Application).

VPA is committed to supporting a noise sub committee under the DCLC.

23 Steven Kinsey June 8, 2007 e-mail

Noise concerns. Calls to TSI 24 hour helpline unanswered.

Informed that noise was operational, that VPA has secured a consultant to obtain background levels for the area. TSI has been advised of concern regarding helpline. Noise update provided to resident, originally presented at June 26, 2007 DCLC meeting. Also provided with VPA contact information

24 Barry Turriff May 29, 2007 Open House

Interest in where individuals can go for answers to questions regarding train noise.

Questions related to trains including whistles, can be directed to: Transport Canada, Surface Railway Safety 225 – 625 Agnes Street New Westminster, BC V3M 5Y4 Tel: 604.666.0011 Fax: 604.666.7747 Web: http://www.tc.gc.ca/pacific/faq/rail/transport.htm Parties affected by rail related noise will soon have additional recourse through the Canada Transportation Act (CTA). Proposed amendments to Section 95 of the CTA that deal with noise and vibration issues is awaiting Royal Assent and could come into force in the near future.




25 May 29, 2007

Open House Concern with shunting and resulting noise in the new rail yard and the impact to the community. Suggests trains be assembled at existing rail yards further east, rather than at the proposed location.

The DP3 project requires two additional gulf sidings within the existing BCRC rail right-of-way. This area is required to facilitate the movement of trains arriving or leaving Roberts Bank

26 May 31, 2007 Open House (2)

Concern that rail noise will lower real estate values.

Train whistling at railway crossings is an important way to ensure the safety of those who use public railway crossings. The railways are aware of the noise related to their operations and the VPA continues to bring issues to the railway’s attention and seek ways to mitigate operational impacts. Parties affected by rail related noise will soon have additional recourse through the Canada Transportation Act (CTA). Proposed amendments to Section 95 of the CTA that deal with noise and vibration issues is awaiting Royal Assent and could come into force in the near future.

LIGHTING

1 Janice Sigfusson April 30, 2007 e-mail to DCLC

Concern over impact to environment of bright lights. VPA lighting at the port authority should be more energy efficient, low-glare that is shielded, and directed downward where it is needed.

With regard to marine construction lighting, the VPA is working with the contractor to ensure the dredge lighting system shields light from spilling outside the basic working footprint of the dredge. TSI, the terminal operator is conducting a study of lighting requirements for DP3. The federal government is releasing new lighting regulations so TSI is waiting to receive these before they can proceed with their lighting design. As part of terminal construction commitments, TSI, the terminal operator, will undertake the following




measures: • Ensure lighting equipment is pointed north and

west, where possible, to reduce impacts to residents who are typically located east and south of the Roberts Bank port facility.

• Implement shielding on terminal construction lighting

• Use down light style, cut-off luminaries for illumination of wharf and container yard areas

• Use less intrusive lighting sources exclusively for illumination of new wharf and container yard areas

• Reduce the amount of lighting during periods of low activity using lighting control systems

• Incorporate an automatic light shutdown system when the booms of new ship-to-shore gantry cranes are raised and inactive for longer than 15 minutes.

2 Jim Ronback May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern regarding light pollution, and features of Project lighting: including the type of fixtures; whether the lights will have full cut-off; whether the lights will be turned off when they are not used; and, if they are dark-sky friendly.

TSI Terminal Systems Inc. is conducting a study of lighting requirements for DP3 and is aware of the commitments outlined in Appendix E. New lighting regulations are being released by the federal government so TSI is waiting to received these before they can proceed with a plan. Retrofitting existing lighting is being considered but not as part of the commitments under the DP3 project.


Interest in innovative mounting systems for lighting on ship-to-shore gantry cranes. Concern with existing system and impacts on community.

Lights on cranes are programmed to turn off and should not be left on – auto shutdown system is in place. If they are not working properly, residents are asked to advise TSI. New cranes will incorporate an automatic light shutdown system when the booms of new ship-to-shore




gantry cranes are raised and inactive for longer than 15 minutes. This system is in place with current cranes. TSI should be notified if automatic shut-off system is not working. TSI will also look at assessing innovative mounting systems for affixing the lights on the cranes.


Interest in how specific requirements under Section 25.3 of Appendix E of the June 2006 Environmental Assessment Report are being addressed. Interest in what is being done with existing lighting.

With regard to marine construction lighting, the VPA is working with the contractor to ensure the dredge lighting system shields light from spilling outside the basic working footprint of the dredge. TSI, the terminal operator is conducting a study of lighting requirements for DP3. The federal government is releasing new lighting regulations so TSI is waiting to receive these before they can proceed with their lighting design. As part of terminal construction commitments, TSI, the terminal operator, will undertake the following measures: • Ensure lighting equipment is pointed north and

west, where possible, to reduce impacts to residents who are typically located east and south of the Roberts Bank port facility.


• Use downlight style, cut-off luminaries for illumination of wharf and container yard areas

• Use less intrusive lighting sources exclusively for illumination of new wharf and container yard areas


• Incorporate an automatic light shutdown system when the booms of new ship-to-shore gantry cranes are raised and inactive for longer than 15




minutes. TSI Terminal Systems Inc. is conducting a study of lighting requirements for DP3 and is aware of the commitments outlined in Appendix E. New lighting regulations are being released by the federal government so TSI is waiting to received these before they can proceed with a plan. Retrofitting existing lighting is being considered by the Terminal but is not a commitment under the DP3 project.

5 Frances Tessier Aug. 31, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding light pollution visible from Galiano Island.

A lighting impact assessment, which included the view from the Gulf Islands, was conducted as a part of the DP3 Environmental Assessment Application. The Project was approved by provincial and federal regulators in Fall 2006. As a part of terminal construction, TSI, the terminal operator, will undertake the following measures to reduce the impact of lighting on surrounding communities:


• Use downlight style, cut-off luminaries for illumination of wharf and container yard areas


• Incorporate an automatic light shutdown system when the booms of new ship-to-shore gantry cranes are raised and inactive for longer than 15 minutes.

RAIL




1 Gordon Hall May 31, 2007 Open House Nov. 24, 2007 Open House Attendee

Where possible, truck traffic needs to be replaced with rail traffic to mitigate traffic on the roads.

Rail is an ideal way to move container outside of the lower mainland. To mitigate traffic impacts from rail, Transport Canada and industry stakeholders are investing in an implementation plan for grade separation and rail improvements along the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor. In addition, VPA will consider additional measures brought forward that address road/rail impacts associated with growth in port traffic volumes.

2 Carla Vassilopoulos Jan. 23, 2007 e-mail

Wondering if overpasses have been planned. Overpasses are being planned as part of the Gateway Program’s SFPR. In addition, VPA is participating in Transport Canada’s Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road Rail Interface Study as part of Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway initiative. The purpose of the study is to develop long-term solutions and identify potential road and rail infrastructure improvements along the corridor. The federal government has committed $50 million to overpasses and underpasses along the Roberts Bank rail corridor. Subsequently, the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study was completed in February. Transport Canada – together with a Steering Committee – is developing an implementation plan for grade separation and rail improvements along the corridor. The objective of the RBRC implementation plan is to ensure that RBRC can accommodate future port growth and handle increased international trade. Ten key grade separation projects have been identified, five of which are located in Delta. They include 57B, 46A (closure), 41B, 80 Street and 72 Street The implementation plan will cost $300 million. The




Federal government has increased funding commitment to $75 million for this program as part of the Asia-Pacific Gateway & Corridor Initiative. VPA intends to make a substantial contribution toward this initiative. Discussions are currently underway with other stakeholders to confirm the level of participation by stakeholders to the implementation plan

3 Gordon Hall May 31, 2007 Open House

Interest in overpasses given train frequency. The Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study, was completed in February. Transport Canada – together with a Steering Committee – is developing an implementation plan for grade separation and rail improvements along the corridor. The objective of the RBRC implementation plan is to ensure that RBRC can accommodate future port growth and handle increased international trade. Ten key grade separation projects have been identified, five of which are located in Delta. They include 57B, 46A (closure), 41B, 80 Street and 72 Street. The implementation plan will cost $300 million. The Federal government has already provided a $75 million commitment to this program as part of the Asia-Pacific Gateway & Corridor Initiative. VPA intends to make a substantial contribution toward this initiative. Discussions are currently underway with other stakeholders to confirm the level of participation by stakeholders to the implementation plan.


Concern that federal funding for rail crossings is inadequate and will not allow for construction of overpasses.

The Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study, was completed in February. Transport Canada – together with a Steering Committee – is developing an implementation plan for grade separation and rail improvements along the corridor. The objective of the




RBRC implementation plan is to ensure that RBRC can accommodate future port growth and handle increased international trade. Ten key grade separation projects have been identified, five of which are located in Delta. They include 57B, 46A (closure), 41B, 80 Street and 72 Street. The implementation plan will cost $300 million. The Federal government has already provided a $75 million commitment to this program as part of the Asia-Pacific Gateway & Corridor Initiative. VPA intends to make a substantial contribution toward this initiative. Discussions are currently underway with other stakeholders to confirm the level of participation by stakeholders to the implementation plan.

5 Vic Rivers May 28, 2007 e-mail July 10, 2007 Vic Rivers e-mail

Interest in reducing train emissions and noise by rail electrification using an overhead power network and shutting down diesel engines at Deltaport to at least Highway 17.

VPA is supportive of new technologies that reduce both the noise and air quality impacts from port related operations. Currently, the terminal does use electric power for the rail-mounted gantry cranes that unload and load containers onto trains, however, the infrastructure to modify the Roberts Bank train corridor has significant challenges due to the fact that there are three separate lines utilizing diesel power locomotives. To our knowledge, the railways have not undertaken sufficient analysis of this concept at this time.

The railways are aware of the noise and air quality concerns related to their operations. VPA will continue to bring issues to the railway's attention and seek ways and means of mitigating operating impacts.




6 Nov. 24, 2007

Open House Attendee

Interest in reading the road/rail interface study. The Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study was completed in February 2007 on behalf of Transport Canada. The study is not part of the Deltaport Third Berth Project.

7 Chas Frizell May 29, 2007 Open House

Requests response to July 24, 2004 letter to the Delta Optimist, regarding interest in establishing a marshalling yard east of Ladner to transfer containers to and from Delta by rail, thereby, eliminating the need for new truck routes.

The concept of an inland container transfer facility has been considered by and is a potential solution to certain operating conditions. For example, if Deltaport’s storage yard was undersized for the berth capacity, then containers could be sent by road and rail to an inland transfer facility. The inland transfer facility would enable Deltaport to achieve its true capacity. However, Deltaport’s storage yard is designed to match the berth capacity and therefore, there is no economic incentive to incur the additional logistics cost of double handling containers at the inland transfer facility. VPA is providing solutions to truck traffic through Highway 17 improvements and the Truck Licensing System, including the truck reservation system. These initiatives are intended to reduce truck traffic impacts on local roads.


Interest in short hauling containers to an offsite location to reduce traffic in the community.

To mitigate traffic impacts from rail, Transport Canada and industry stakeholders are investing in an implementation plan for grade separation and rail improvements along the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor. In addition, VPA will consider additional measures brought forward that address road/rail impacts associated with growth in port traffic volumes.


North of the Boundary Bay airport, there is a yard that could be used for container storage, to reduce the impacts of hauling containers by rail.

To mitigate traffic impacts from rail, Transport Canada and industry stakeholders are investing in an implementation plan for grade separation and rail




improvements along the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor. In addition, VPA will consider additional measures brought forward that address road/rail impacts associated with growth in port traffic volumes.

10 Bob Campbell, Unattributed (1) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in VPA and DCLC supporting a no-whistle rail crossing at 127A.

Beyond the scope of the Delta Third Berth Project.

The Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study was completed in February 2007. The study is not part of the Deltaport Third Berth Project. The study looked at addressing long-term infrastructure solutions and identified road and rail infrastructure improvements along the corridor to facilitate long-term port growth. The study identifies mitigation for current noise issues and improved connectivity for agricultural traffic. The study was coordinated by Transport Canada with other participants including the BC Ministry of Transportation, TransLink, Greater Vancouver Gateway Council and the Port. Delta, Surrey, Langley City and the Township of Langley also contributed to the study.

11 Bob Campbell Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in train speed reduction past Panorama Ridge at night.

Beyond the scope of the Delta Third Berth Project.

Refer to the note above regarding The Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road/Rail Interface Study

ROAD

1 Paul Sansom Feb. 19, 2007 e-mail

Concern with traffic impacts on local residents. VPA acknowledges that traffic congestion is a major concern in the region. In the short-term, VPA is working with the Ministry of Transportation to design upgrades that will mitigate the additional truck-trips caused by the expansion of Deltaport. Delta municipality will be involved in this process. The VPA supports the provincial Gateway Program and is working in partnership with the provincial and federal




governments to develop and finance the South Fraser Perimeter Road as a long-term solution to regional transportation needs. The Gateway Program has more detailed information on their website http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/gateway/

2 Andrea Janssen Feb. 14, 2007 e-mail

Concern with traffic impacts on local residents and air quality impacts.

VPA acknowledges that traffic congestion is a major concern in the region. VPA is working with the Ministry of Transportation to design upgrades that will mitigate the additional truck-trips caused by the expansion of Deltaport. Delta municipality will be involved in this process. The VPA supports the provincial Gateway Program and is working in partnership with the provincial and federal governments to develop and finance the South Fraser Perimeter Road as a long-term solution to regional transportation needs. The Gateway Program has more detailed information on their website http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/gateway/ The Air Quality section of the VPA website at http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/air_quality/ provides a comprehensive overview of initiatives being undertaken by the VPA to improve air quality related to port activities.

3 Gordon Hall May 31, 2007 Open House

Interest in reducing truck traffic during peak periods.

VPA has implemented a truck reservation system as part of it’s Trucking Policy. The goal is to ensure a consistent flow of container trucks during the day, and eliminate congestion during peak traffic periods. In addition, the VPA has implemented extended gate hours, which help facilitate the movement of containers during off-peak hours.




4 John Hutton Oct. 15, 2007 e-mail

Response to Port of Vancouver ad “What Matters to You Matters to Us” in South Delta Leader Oct. 12, 2007. Concern regarding truck traffic on Highway 17. Suggestion of a third lane on Highway 17 for container trucks. Concern regarding unsafe behavior of truck drivers

VPA is committed to making improvements on Highway 17 to mitigate additional port related traffic that is expected as a result of the Deltaport Third Berth Project. VPA, the BC Ministry of Transportation and the Corporation of Delta have prepared a conceptual plan for these works and a detailed plan Is underway. Construction is expected to begin early next year and be complete by mid 2008. Improvements will include:

• Extension of the On-ramp from Highway 17 northbound to Highway 99 southbound

• Extension of northbound HOV lane on Highway 17 south of Ladner Trunk Road

• Signal modifications at Highway 17 / Ladner Trunk Road

VPA also made a commitment to seek Ministry of Transportation (MoT) approval to restrict north and south bound trucks on Highway 17 to the outside lane. MoT agreed to implement this change and is expected to do so by the end of this year.

VPA will be contributing $50 million to the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Project. This is a $300 million initiative to reduce congestion at grade crossings by constructing overpasses throughout Delta Surrey and Langley. This program is a joint undertaking of Transport Canada, MoT, Translink, the Railways, the four Municipalities and VPA.

VPA has implemented a Truck Licensing System (TLS) to work towards optimizing the movement of container trucks through the port and port communities. The VPA




is utilizing this license to implement stricter safety requirements for container tricks. VPA is also working with the Ministry of Transportation, ICBC and Delta Police to share information that would allow VPA to suspend or rescind a license (resulting in a loss of access to port property) if the container truck does not follow the rules and requirements outlined by all relevant regulatory agencies.

VPA is developing a Port Operations Community Pilot Program. During the initial phase of this program, VPA is working directly with truckers who are observed violating traffic regulations, to educate them and work with responsible agencies to develop long-term solutions to container trucking issues.

5 David Morisawa, Unattributed (1) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern with increased numbers of trucks on local highways and the impact of increased congestion on road safety.

See above.

6 Hans Dysarz Feb. 15, 2007 phone call

Truck traffic is heavy and drivers are rude and dangerous.

Advised to contact VPA with license numbers. Subsequently, In July 2007, VPA will introduce a more rigorous and demanding container Truck License System (TLS). The goal of the new TLS is to develop a safer, cleaner and more sustainable container truck fleet to service port operations. Through the more stringent version of the TSL, VPA will prohibit the access of substandard trucks on port property.

7 Greg Hoover April 30, 2007 Letter May 29, 2007

Concern for truck safety, emissions from dirty fuel and faulty operation. Concern with effectiveness of the Truck Licensing System.

By July 2007, the VPA will introduce even stricter container truck safety and environmental standards. VPA will continue to support Delta Police and the British




Open House (2) May 31, 2007 Open House (2)

Columbia Ministry of Transportation to implement more rigourous inspection standards and conduct ongoing inspection of container trucks. VPA will continue to work with the British Columbia Trucking Association, the Ministry of Transportation’s Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement unit and ICBC’s AirCare On Road program to raise safety and environmental standards and awareness in the trucking sector.

8 Arthur David, Christine Rigby, Chris Lundquist, Unattributed (5) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over safe truck operations in the community and the regulation/enforcement of same. Concern over enforcement of restriction of trucks to curb lanes.

VPA has implemented a Truck Licensing System (TLS) to work towards optimizing the movement of container trucks through the port and port communities. The VPA is utilizing this license to implement stricter safety requirements for container tricks. VPA is also working with the Ministry of Transportation, ICBC and Delta Police to share information that would allow VPA to suspend or rescind a license (resulting in a loss of access to port property) if the container truck does not follow the rules and requirements outlined by all relevant regulatory agencies.


Concern with impacts to Highway 17. Need for coordination with Gateway Project regarding light and turn signals along highway.

VPA is working with MoT to design upgrades to HWY 17 to mitigate additional traffic from DP3. VPA acknowledges that long-term regional solutions are required and supports the Ministry of Transportation’s Gateway Program.

10 Alison Kinsey Jan. 23, 2007 e-mail

Concerned that expansion has not addressed traffic issues. Stated that SFPR does not address tunnel traffic and concerned that truck usage has resulted in damage to HWY 17.

VPA is working with MoT to design upgrades to HWY 17 to mitigate additional traffic from DP3. VPA acknowledges that long-term regional solutions are required and supports the Ministry of Transportation’s Gateway Program and will contribute financially to SFPR. VPA has also implemented a comprehensive Reservations System and Truck Licensing Program to




optimize the movement of container vehicles and minimize any additional truck traffic during peak periods on local roads.


Concern over conflicts with trucks in transition from Highway 17 to Highway 99 northbound.

The Port is investing $3.2 million on Highway 17 improvements to mitigate the impact of the Deltaport Third Berth Project. Improvements will be made to the eastbound merge lane from Highway 17 onto Highway 99. When the Project reaches full capacity in 2012, these improvements will enable travel time on Highway 17 to improve slightly, thereby providing an overall improvement to the existing situation. Additionally, the Ministry of Transportation has received authority to implement commercial lane restrictions and is accelerating this initiative as part of the Highway 17 improvements. Although a new alignment is not required for the DP3 project’s additional 600 single trips per day, Longer-term solutions are required to reduce congestion in the region. Once the SFPR is completed heavy truck traffic is likely to be restricted from using what is currently Highway 17 between the existing Roberts Bank interchange and Hwy 99 JCT. The project team designing and implementing the Highway 17 road improvements will be looking to minimize potential vehicle conflicts at this location.




12 May 29 & 31

Open House Interest in traffic impact mitigation given DP3 will be operational in 2009 and Gateway is not to be completed by 2012?

To address traffic congestion on Highway 17, VPA is working with the Ministry of Transportation and Corporation of Delta to design upgrades that will mitigate the additional truck traffic required during the Deltaport Third Berth project and ongoing operation of the expanded terminal. The improvement measures that have been proposed include:

• Improvements to the Highway 17 / Highway 99 ramp

• Extension of HOV lanes on Highway 17 south of Ladner Trunk Road

• Electronic signs on Highway 17 connected to Highway 99 Massey Tunnel congestion management system

• Signal modifications at Highway 17 / Ladner Trunk Road, as appropriate and approved by MOT and Delta.

13 Ian Robertson

Nov. 2, 2007 e-mail

Request for truck and rail traffic information and statistics, including changes over the last four years (when DP3 environmental application was submitted), and projections for the future. Interest in rationale for BC Rail desire for a 17 track yard.

Over the last four years, the percentages of traffic for rail (65%) versus truck (35%) have remained about the same. Over the longer term, imports are expected to grow marginally more than exports. The percentage of rail traffic should trend slightly upwards over time.

In 2004, there were approximately 1800 truck trips per day. Presently there are about 1900 trips per day; 1500 during the day shift and 400 in the evening.

The most recent survey information, taken in 2004, indicated that approximately 40% of the truck trips




travelled through the Massey Tunnel, 34% went along River Road, and 27% went along Highway 99. The current real estate market has created a trend to relocate distribution and warehouse facilities from the Richmond area to places in Surrey and Langley, and even further out in the Valley. This trend will probably continue and as a result, the percentage of trips through the Massey Tunnel will decline.

The changes in rail traffic are less significant. In 2004, there were approximately 18 trains per day. That number remains the same today. It includes 12 coal trains and 6 container trains. The length of coal trains has remained the same. The length of some container trains has increased. When a rail forecast was done in 2004, it was based on a combination of 6000, 9000, and 12000 foot lengths. The railways prefer to operate container trains longer than 6000 feet and will probably continue to trend towards 9000 and 12000 foot trains.

With regard to truck and rail traffic around 2012, we project 2400 truck trips per day and 21 trains per day, as forecasted in the environmental application.

The VPA is not aware of plans for BC Rail to create a 17 track yard. The Deltaport Third Berth Project requires two additional gulf sidings within BCRC’s existing right-of-way.

14 Carla Vassilopoulos Jan. 15, 2007 e-mail.

Upset that trucks use the same road as ferry and local traffic. Wanted to know if VPA could implement Hoover/Naas proposal.

MOT is the lead agency for the South Fraser Perimeter Road (SFPR). They have reviewed the Hoover/Naas proposal as part of the SFPR project review. SFPR will take local traffic off HWY 17.

15 Margita Pickett Concern regarding flashing traffic light at Issue forwarded to the Ministry of Transportation, who




June 6, 2007 e-mail to DCLC

intersection on 41B. Notes that the line of sight for cars and fast-moving trucks heading north across Deltaport Way is limited. Suggests that shrubs on the side of the road be removed to increase visibility and decrease chances of collision, if the traffic light continues flashing.

have jurisdiction. Ministry of Transportation advised they are sending someone to investigate.


Truck observed ignoring traffic control devices. It is highly recommended that individuals contact Delta Police when observing trucks ignoring traffic control devices as VPA does not have enforcement jurisdiction on public roads. VFPA cannot enforce traffic violations, however, through the Truck Licensing System, the VPA can advise trucking companies of complaints against their drivers. To do this individuals can contact 604-665-9333. Details required when contacting VPA include: 1. WHO:The name of trucking company or license

plate number 2. WHAT: What was the infraction that was observed 3. WHEN: What time and date did the incident occur. 4. WHERE: Exact location of incident. 5. HOW: Note how infraction affected regular traffic

flow. It is important that individuals leave their name and contact information so that VPA can follow-up if required.




OTHER SOCIO-ECONOMIC


Questions the benefits for Delta residents from the Deltaport expansion.

The project will benefit the community through the creation of jobs and economic spin-off benefits, as well as tax revenues for the municipality.


Interest in how public access will be affected by Deltaport

The causeway road is a provincial highway available for public vehicles but there are no parking areas on the causeway and public use of the shoreline is not encouraged by BC Rail Company.

3 Open House May 29, 2007

Concern with loss of moorage for the Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel (Roberts Bank Lifeboat Society/Pacific Lifeboats) at Roberts Bank. Interest in replacement moorage. Interest in community funding available to replace existing vessel.

VPA was required by the approving regulatory agencies to reduce the size of the new tug basin (where the Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel would have been located) to the smallest possible footprint for tugs only, to minimize impacts on fish habitat. The reduced size of the new tug basin could not provide adequate moorage space for the Coast Guard Auxiliary's vessel.

4 Teresa Cooper May 2007

Would like to know if there is an Emergency & Safety plan and what it looks like. Would like to know if plan effects Delta Hospital and is the hospital capable of dealing with the port in an emergency?

Both the contractor, during construction and TSI as the operator are required to have Health and Safety and Emergency Response Plans in place. As part of the socio-community study that was undertaken for the DP3 application potential incidents were taken into consideration and the effects on the local health services to respond. The study determined that current emergency services are capable of handling emergency services requirements for the third berth.

5 John Hatfield Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over project impacts to farmland. The Deltaport Third Berth Project, including the terminal, rail and road improvements, does not impact farmland. The Project’s Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate does state that “new business opportunities might be capitalized locally” but this is only an indication of opportunity and




is not part of the project. New businesses are not required in Delta for the project to proceed. However, if businesses are interested in expanding in Delta, they will be subject to availability of appropriately zoned land and each project will be reviewed under the appropriate permit process.

6 Roger Emsley December 8, 2007 e-mail

Interest in how many new jobs will be created year by year to 2020. Request for definition (geographic boundary) of jobs that will be created “locally” from increased container traffic at Deltaport. Request for the job classifications for the 3000 jobs created directly from increased container traffic at Deltaport. Interest in where the 3000 people who will acquire the 3000 jobs created directly from increased container traffic at Deltaport will be living, and how it can be ascertained that they even will be living in Delta. Interest in calculations for the $161 million in wages that will be created from increased container traffic and be paid entirely in Delta.

Year by year estimates are not available. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that employment will grow towards the 2020 levels, broadly in line with traffic growth at Deltaport. The Corporation of Delta (Ladner, Tsawwassen and North Delta). The job classifications include a range of jobs associated with the handling and movement of goods through Deltaport. These include, but are not limited to, longshoremen, crane operators, government inspectors, rail yard workers, port authority staff and others. The 3000 people are projected to be from Delta. The particular residence of those employed has not been estimated. The wage estimates are based on the average wages paid in the job types likely to be created at Deltaport. The average wages were ascertained form previous surveys at Port of Vancouver facilities.




Interest in whether jobs lost as a result of being exported offshore from increased container traffic were taken into account in job creation calculations.

No downstream impacts (positive or negative) have yet been estimated.

CONSTRUCTION SAFETY

1 Roger Emsley Nov. 12, 2007 e-mail

Concern that fuel storage tanks situated in DP3 area were not included in environmental assessment. Was the location approved by regulatory agencies? What would happen if there were to be a spill?

Fuel tank in photo provided is one of three tanks required as a part of the Terminal Fill operations for DP3 and were reviewed by VPA in accordance with the DP3 Fisheries Act Authorization. They are used to fuel the equipment required during the Terminal Fill operation phases of the Project, not general project equipment. The tanks are removed from the site when Terminal Fill operation phases are not underway. The fuel storage tanks comply with the latest CCME Environmental Code of Practice for above ground storage tanks containing petroleum products. The contractor met the conditions of the authorization, in addition to conditions placed upon them by the VPA Environmental Programs that included lighting and daily monitoring for all tanks as well as 120% containment behind a perimeter berm and concrete barriers for the stationary tank. The contractor has provided and adhered to a discrete timeline for fuel storage for Terminal Fill operations as submitted to VPA. Each fuel tank has its own spill response kit either affixed to the tank (skid mounted tank) or located adjacent to the tank (stationary tank). VPA has advised the contractor to maintain a safe operating distance from slopes. VPA environmental monitor(s) adhered to the monitoring requirements of




the DFO Authorization and recorded details as to the condition and location of the tanks and their associated spill kits. All VPA environmental monitoring reports have been submitted to the DFO and relevant agencies for their review and comments; any concerns that may have been related to these fuel storage tanks were addressed immediately by the contractor and documented by the VPA environmental monitor. No spills or incidents have been recorded by the VPA environmental monitor.

2 Roger Emsley Nov. 17, 2007 e-mail

Questions regarding barge containing equipment for the construction of DP3 that ran aground on the south side of the Roberts Bank Causeway as a result of high winds on November 12

1) Who is responsible for monitoring equipment over the weekend?

2) Was the barge unattended after it had run aground?

3) Why wasn’t the Delta Fire Dept. or other regulatory agencies made aware of this incident when a member of the public reported it in the early afternoon Nov. 12?

4) Who is responsible for activating an incident response at the third berth?

5) When did they do so? 6) Who was advised? 7) Was this done in a timely manner? 8) Were details provided to Transport

Canada with respect to the dangerous goods and other items on the barge?

9) Was Vessel Services at Transport Canada made aware? When?

10) What is the emergency response plan for an incident such as this at Deltaport Third

1) Deltaport Contractors Ltd. (DCL). 2) DCL’s delegated site inspector was at the site

by 6:30am on November 12. Marine Superintendant arrived at the site at 8am. DCL’s Project Engineer attended the site from 10:45am - 2:30pm. DCL’s Field Engineer and a DCL deckhand visited the site from 10:30am to approximately noon.

3) Because the barge and its contents were undamaged and at no risk of releasing harmful substances into the environment, DCL did not activate its emergency protocol.

4) DCL. 5) They did not. 6) An anonymous call to MCTS. As the barge was

no longer adrift they contacted VPA harbour patrol who then contacted VPA’s Duty Officer.

7) No. 8) No. The barge’s contents would not normally be

considered dangerous goods subject to Transport of Dangerous Goods requirements.

9) No. 10) DCL responsible for notifying agencies. DCL

emergency plan provided.




Berth-and who is responsible for notifying the various agencies?

DCL did fail to notify the Port about what was happening so that questions from the public could be answered. DCL apologizes for this omission.

DELTAPORT THIRD BERTH PROJECT COMMUNITY LIAISON COMMITTTEE

1 Corporation of Delta regular council meeting resolution - Jan. 29, 2007

That VPA be requested to amend the terms of reference for the Community Liaison Committee to make Delta’s position permanent for the duration of the committee.

The VPA will amend terms of reference to include Delta’s position as permanent for the duration of the committee’s mandated timeframe. VPA will also be receiving comments from other DCLC members and will include all amendments to the terms of reference at that time.


That VPA be requested to select members for the Community Liaison Committee to reflect a broad range of community interests with representation of residents from both North and South Delta.”

This is VPA’s intention. As stated in the draft terms of reference in Section 2, Composition and Membership: Membership will consist of up to 15 individuals. Members will:

• Represent a variety of interests including municipal, residential, conservation, farming, business groups, Tsawwassen First Nation, TSI and VPA;

• Provide geographic representation from the whole community; and,

• Bring expertise and experience, both technical and social.

Subsequently, the committee has been formed and it consists of 18 members who represent a broad range of community interests.


That VPA be requested to amend the draft terms of reference for the Community Liaison Committee to include a requirement that the committee regularly review and update the Table of Commitments and append a copy of the updated table to the meeting minutes.

The purpose of the Committee is to work with VPA during the construction and first year operation phase of the third berth at Deltaport to identify community concerns, develop potential solutions to address those concerns and assist in communicating information among the community, VPA and other port stakeholders. VPA will be reporting to the committee on




the status of Environmental Management Plans and the Table of Commitments. Also, the status of the Table of Commitments will be posted online, and available to Delta.


That VPA be requested to submit the draft terms of reference for the Noise Committee to Delta, the government regulators and TFN for acceptance prior to the start of construction work.

VPA will work with DCLC to develop a terms of reference for a sub-committee dealing with noise issues.

5 Bernita Iversen Feb. 8, 2007 e-mail

Notification that Ms. Iversen to represent Delta on the Community Liaison Committee.

Ms. Iversen will be advised when DCLC is selected. In the meantime, she has provided contact info and her name has been added to the automatic project advisory list. Subsequently, the committee has been selected and meetings are underway.

CONSULTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS

1 Guy Gentner MLA Feb. 28, 2007 letter

Concern that he was not contacted regarding establishment of this committee and looked forward to response and being a participant on the committee.

The BC Environmental Assessment Certificate for the Deltaport project included an Owners Table of Commitments and Assurances that requires the VPA to prepare a Community Liaison Plan and form Community Liaison Committee. VPA is proceeding with its obligation to fulfill both of these commitments. Confirmed that elected government officials have not been asked to participate on the Deltaport Third Berth Project Community Liaison Committee. DCLC Terms Of Reference and Community Liaison Plan provided.

2 Joe Lee May 31, 2007 Open House

Concern with extent of open house advertising. Advertisements were placed as follows: South Delta Leader: May 18 and May 25 Delta Optimist: May 19 and May 26




Surrey/North Delta Leader: May 25 In addition, email notification was sent out to individuals on the project advisory email list. Individuals that are interested in receiving up-to-date information are encouraged to sign-up for regular advisories at http://www.portvancouver.com/the_port/deltaport.html The events were posted on the VPA website. In addition, the Corporation of Delta advertised this even on their reader boards beginning on May 22, 2007, as well as their website.

3 Robin Lee May 31, 2007 Open House

Suggests additional open house in libraries, service organizations, school boards and McKee’s House senior centre.

VPA will work with the DCLC to determine location, venue and dates for Fall open house event.

4 Mayor Lois Jackson June 19, 2007 letter

Concern with the Corporation of Delta not being asked to be involved in the allocation of the $2 million Delta community amenity fund. Concern regarding the amount of community amenity funding made available for the Corporation of Delta from the VPA.

VPA is actively considering advice on how to allocate the $2 million Delta community amenity fund. The matter was raised with the DCLC, where the VPA asked if the committee wished to have any involvement in the process. No decision has been made on this matter, nor has the DCLC even had an opportunity to discuss what, if any, involvement they may like to have. Additionally, the VPA would like to work with the Corporation of Delta to allocate the funds, and any formal announcement on the finality of excluding the Corporation of Delta is incorrect. The amount of community amenity funding is in addition to $25 million that VPA is spending on environmental mitigation and $3 million that the VPA is contributing to Highway 17 improvements. Further, the VPA will fund up to $50 million for long-term investment in road and rail grade separations along the rail corridor.




5 Wilma Haig e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007

VPA website access to DCLC information materials.

Links streamlined as suggested.

6 Bernard C. Barton Nov. 13, 2007 e-mail

Response to Container Expansion e-mail regarding Nov. 24th open house. Opposed to DP3 Project.

Comment noted.

7 Carol Vignale Nov. 16, 2007 e-mail

Concern that “Town & Country” location for Nov. 24 DP3 public open house is not accessible by public transit. Suggestion that future open houses be located at transit convenient locations. Suggestion of no-charge community bus for Nov. 24 open house.

Comments will be brought forward to DP3 Project Team and DCLC for consideration when planning future events. The location was selected because it was central to both North Delta and South Delta communities. In the past, events have been held at both the Town and Country and in Tsawwassen. Due to extremely low turnout at both events, the decision was made to hold one event at a central location.

8 David Morrey, Dave Harden Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Support for project. Comment noted.

9 Deryle Stewart, Unattributed (2) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Appreciative of information provided at open house.

Comment noted.

10 Deryle Stewart Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Need to better communicate environmental protection measures, including introduction of the hybrid crane.

The diesel electric hybrid rubber tire gantry crane was discussed on the Project website, on the open house information boards developed for the November 2007 open house and on the Owner’s Table of Commitments and Assurances, available on the Project website. Other environmental protection measures are discussed further discussed in Project newsletters and fact sheets




11 Barrett

Sleeman Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Terminal should include a public viewing area. The Deltaport terminal is a busy industrial facility that requires security clearance. At this time, a public viewing area is not being considered for public safety reasons.

12 Unattributed Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in earlier and more extensive notification of open houses through the Delta Optimist.

Notification of open houses is provided at least seven days in advance (in accordance with provincial environmental assessment guidelines) in the following newspapers:

• Delta Optimist • South Delta Leader • North Delta/Surrey Leader

REGULATORY


That VPA be requested to develop a 'community accountability framework' with respect to the Table of Commitments to track performance and to provide timelines for the completion of those commitments.

Community accountability is tracked by the EAO. VPA is required to submit reports, including timelines, to the EAO every three months. The first report is being prepared and will be sent to EAO next week and posted on the VPA website. A copy of the report will be provided to the DCLC.


That VPA be requested to provide timelines for the submission of the Construction Environmental Management Plan and related sub-plans to the regulatory agencies for review, comment and approval as appropriate.

A copy of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (as of Feb. 26, 2007) was provided.


Concern that the rail yard expansion to 17 sidings was omitted from the Environmental Assessment.

The rail yard expansion for the project only requires two additional sidings within BCRC’s existing right-of-way. This was included in the Environmental Assessment. A copy of the EA Application is still available on the VPA’s website at http://www.portvancouver.com/container_expansion/deltaport/index.html




4 Al Webb

May 29, 2007 Open House

Terminal 2 should have been included in the Environmental Assessment.

Terminal 2 is still in the conceptual phase. However, Terminal 2, based on a theoretical three-berth terminal, was included in the Deltaport Third Berth EA as part of the cumulative effects assessment.


The federal government was secretive about public comments on the final report to the Minister

The public were invited to comment on the federal scoping document – the scope and factors to be considered for the Environmental Assessment - on July 27, 2004 issued for public comment until September 2004. From July 2006 to September 2006, public were invited to review the federal comprehensive study report. The federal review process does not include posting of public comments, as is the case with the BCEAA process. However, the federal review considered comments made under the provincial Environmental Assessment and these comments are available on the EAO’s website at http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/epic/output/html/deploy/epic_project_home_212.html

6 Wilma Haig May 31, 2007 Open House Roger Elmsley June 29, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding the extent of the cumulative effects assessment.

VPA conducted a Cumulative Effects Assessment for the Deltaport Third Berth Project Environmental Assessment Application based on the provincial Terms of Reference and federal scoping document. This assessment was updated in late 2005 in response to government regulatory agencies (DFO and EC), First Nations and public review comments received on the EA application. The Cumulative Effects Assessment addressed the cumulative effects of the proposed Deltaport Third




Berth Project, in combination with other projects that have been or will be carried out based on the best information that was known at the time of the assessment and included Terminal 2 and the South Fraser Perimeter Road.

PROJECT RATIONALE

1 Bernard and Carrie Barton Feb. 13, 2007 e-mail

Port expansion will be redundant due to widening of Panama Canal.

Canadian industry projections indicate 300% growth of container traffic at western North American Ports by 2020. Subsequently, When the Panama Canal opens in 2015, it will enable much larger ships to transit through to Gulf and East Coast ports which can serve the US South East and US Midwest markets, which is a market primarily served by Los Angeles and Long Beach ports, not Vancouver.


Questioned the need for the Project given the apparent under use of existing storage areas at Deltaport.

Storage areas at Deltaport are not under utilized. In 2007, Deltaport handled 1.1 million TEUs compared to its rated capacity of 900,000 TEUs.

3 May 29, 31, 2007 Open House

Interest in VPA projections for overall container traffic to North America, including any studies or reports that take into consideration the widening and deepening of the Panama Canal. Interest in VPA container projections coming from China - for western North America; all of North America; for Canada. Interest in VPA projections for China's market share over the next 25 years.

Container projections from Asia to North American west coast ports could reach 75 million TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) by 2025. By 2025, BC’s ports expect to handle 11 Million TEUs, including seven million TEUs through the Vancouver Gateway and four million TEUs through Prince Rupert. When the Panama Canal opens in 2015, it will enable much larger ships to transit through to Gulf and East Coast ports which can serve the US South East and US Midwest markets, which is a market primarily served by Los Angeles and Long Beach ports, not Vancouver.

4 Louisa Silva Opposed to project. Rationale and environmental protection measures




Dec. 30, 2007 e-mail

provided.

OTHER (Beyond Scope of DP3)

1 Ken McNames May 8, 10, 11 2007 e-mails to DCLC

Concern regarding loud noises and vibrations from Deltaport including: 1. Train whistles. 2. Coast guard hover craft making noise 3. Terminal operations (container being moved) 4. Thumping from ship generator

Noises not related to DP3 as marine construction and dredging activities were not underway at the time of the reports. The train noises described appear to be related to regular train activities to and from the terminal. There are many initiatives that are currently underway to address train noise in the community. In January 2007, the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor Road Rail Interface Study was completed. The study was coordinated by Transport Canada with other participants including MOT, TransLink, Greater Vancouver Gateway Council and VPA. Delta, Surrey, Langley City and Langley Township also contributed to the study. The study looks at addressing long-term infrastructure solutions and identifies road and rail infrastructure improvements along the corridor that include mitigating for current noise issues and improved connectivity for agricultural traffic. In addition, the provincial Gateway Program has identified grade separation projects over the rail corridor at 64th St. and 36th Ave, which will mitigate for whistle noise at these crossings. The federal government announced $75 million to fund road/rail grade crossing improvements and mitigation along the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor. The Vancouver Port Authority (VPA) will also be contributing funding




towards road/rail grade separation improvements and noise mitigation along the corridor. Train whistles are a regulatory requirement for the railways and cessation of whistles at grade rail crossings is a process that must be initiated by a municipality. VPA is supportive of whistle cessation initiatives in the Corporation of Delta and City of Surrey who have initiated this process. Regarding Coast Guard hovercraft, VPA does not have jurisdiction over the Coast Guard. Contact information for the Coast Guard supplied. Residents are asked to contact TSI when regular terminal operations or a ship is causing unusually loud noise.

2 Alison Kinsey Jan. 23, 2007 e-mail

Concerned about increased noise at night, which appears to be train shunting. Stated that current noise is not acceptable.

VPA is working with the community and the DCLC to address construction related noise issues. Information line is available to report noise for VPA to investigate, 604-665-9337.

3 Vic Rivers Jan. 25, 2007 e-mail

Concern over a noisy ship that kept house awake in the middle of the night (3 am). Interest in a long-term solution, including ground power at the dock. Desire to see the 24-hour help line established immediately, yet expressed doubt over its efficacy.

The ship in question, the OOCL San Francisco, docked under three generators, later reduced to one – the in-shore generator at the berth. The DP3 Project includes infrastructure provisions for the establishment of shore-to-ship power. Project comment and information line is established, 604-665-9337.

4 Alison and Steve Kinsey Feb. 16, 2007 phone call

Concerns regarding loud noise coming from Deltaport.

Source of noise investigated and It was determined noise came from a ship’s generator. Ship left terminal that evening.




5 Vic Rivers

May 10, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding loud noises coming from Deltaport.

Believed to be a faulty generator on board a vessel calling at Deltaport, not related to DP3 construction. Information passed onto TSI for action with shipping line.

6 Paul Voth, Steve Kinsey, Unattributed (1) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over ship/generator noise while ship is at dock.

Residents can call TSI directly if they have concerns with vessels at the Deltaport container terminal. TSI is able to follow-up with ships directly. In addition, VPA can also follow-up with shipping line and contact the MCTS (vessel traffic services – Canada Coast Guard) who will contact the ship’s pilot and advise the captain to take remedial action. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arriving at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.

7 Alison Kinsey December 4, 2007 e-mail

Third day in a row single specific boat has made noise. Questions as to when it is leaving and if it could get blacklisted.

Residents can call TSI directly if they have concerns with vessels at the Deltaport container terminal. TSI is able to follow-up with ship directly. In addition, VPA can also follow-up with shipping line and contact the MCTS (vessel traffic services – Canada Coast Guard) who will contact the ship’s pilot and advise the captain to take remedial action. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.




8 Steve Kinsey

December 11, 2007 e-mail Vic Rivers December 12, 2007 e-mail

Concern over low droning noise at night abruptly starting and stopping.

The only equipment operating overnight at the Deltaport Berth 3 construction site limited to densification equipment, which is relatively quiet and not a likely source of the low frequency “droning” noise referred to. A contractor, JJM, is working near the Tsawwassen ferry terminal and is using a large EX1800 backhoe that may be the source of the noise. JJM is believed to be working on environmental works related to the BCTC transmission line project. It is suggested that concerned individuals contact JJM and/or BCTC to inquire about JJM’s hours of operation.

9 Hans Dysarz Feb. 15, 2007 phone call

Suggests VPA assess his proposal that VPA provide a marina at the foot of Roberts Bank to balance some of their impact on the local community.

Suggestion provided to VPA.

10 Susan Jones Feb. 23, 2007 e-mail

Request for information regarding recent oil spill. Informed that the February 19, 2007 spill of marine diesel originated from an unknown source in the Strait of Georgia.


Interest in how Prince Rupert port affected air quality and traffic.

Information on Prince Rupert can be obtained by contacting the Port of Prince Rupert. http://www.rupertport.com/


Opposition to the South Fraser Perimeter Road. Does not pertain to Deltaport Third Berth Project. The project proponent for the South Fraser Perimeter Road is the provincial Ministry of Transportation.


Concerns with/opposition to Terminal 2. VPA has begun the process of selecting a Terminal 2 Partner and expects to have a partner picked by Spring 2008. Once selected both entities will then commence work on the development of the conceptual and environmental plans for the project. These plans will be developed in consultation with the community and the relevant environmental agencies.




14 May 31, 2007

Open House Questioned why Delta must bear the burden of consumer demand in BC and Canada.

The Deltaport Third Berth Project is one of several projects underway across BC, to meet the increased demand for consumer goods from the Asia Pacific region. Currently, the VPA has two terminals in the Burrard Inlet (Vanterm and Centerm), which have both undergone recent expansion programs to increase their capacity. In addition, Prince Rupert is also building a facility to handle containerized cargo from Asia.


Concern regarding coal ship’s dirty exhaust and apparent failure to spray water to arrest dust.

Does not pertain directly to DP3 project. More information requested to further investigate and serve the ship a notice.

16 Vic Rivers Sept. 12, 2007 email

Concern regarding excessive exhaust coming from ship at Deltaport

Residents can call TSI directly if they have concerns with vessels at the Deltaport container terminal. TSI is able to follow-up with ship directly. In addition, VPA can also follow-up with shipping line and contact the MCTS (vessel traffic services – Canada Coast Guard) who will contact the ship’s pilot and advise the captain to take remedial action. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.

17 Wilma Haig e-mail to DCLC Sept. 3, 2007

Interest in the status of the Wildlife Management Area proposed for between the causeways and to the north.

The proposed Roberts Bank Wildlife Management Area is an initiative of the Government of British Columbia




18 Alison Kinsey

Sept. 11, 2007 e-mail

Concern regarding high level of noise emanating from ship generator.

Determined that reported noise was from an OOCL vessel. TSI will follow up with ship to ensure that noise does not continue. TSI maintains a record of ships that have had noise issues. VPA has requested the list of ships, and will be following up with those shipping lines to identify and implement proactive measures to address noise issues.

19 Steve Kinsey Sept. 12, 2007 e-mail

Request for report on progress with noise and air pollution. Has the VPA been tracking problematic (noise/pollution) vessels? Does the VPA have a plan to deal with offending vessels?

TSI maintains a record of ships that have had noise and pollution issues. TSI works directly with ships when issues arise to try and reduce noise impacts on the community. TSI and VPA have issued a joint notice to all carriers that arrive at Deltaport, requesting that they monitor their generators for both noise and emissions.

20 Bernita Iversen Oct. 3, 2007 e-mail

Request on behalf of Delta Council for notification and response procedures in regards to moving trains to ensure emergency access across grade crossings.

Notification and response procedures provided. Informed that BCRC’s emergency phone number is posted at all at-grade crossings. Any emergency vehicle being blocked or delayed by a train can call the emergency number to check on the status of the crossing. Informed that although procedures are standard for the railway, there may not have been recent discussions on the protocol with Delta Police, Fire and Emergency Services. BCRC has taken the lead to follow-up directly to ensure the procedures are understood and the appropriate protocols are in place with each municipality along the rail line.




21 John Hutton

Oct. 15, 2007 e-mail

Response to Port of Vancouver ad, “What Matters to You Matters to Us” in South Delta Leader Oct. 12, 2007. Concern regarding VPA not paying property taxes

The terminal operators at Roberts Bank (Deltaport and Westshore) paid a total of $5.8 million in property taxes to Delta in 2007. VPA paid an additional amount as a PILT payment (Payment In Lieu of Taxes) on the vacant port property at Roberts Bank. After remitting the school tax and other levies to other agencies, Delta kept approximately 60% or $3.1 million of that amount. Deltaport and Westshore are the two largest tax payers in Delta.

22 Ms. Brown Nov. 19, 2007 phone call

Request for information regarding rail lines in Surrey.

Informed that rail lines in caller’s area are not related to the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor. Copy of rail line map provided, as well as a contact for the City of Surrey for working group information.

23 Steven Kinsey Nov. 22, 2007 e-mail

Noise reported. Usually takes place past 11pm at night. Also a rumbling sound reported Nov. 22, 2007 at 9:40am PST.

Noise appears to be related to ship in berth at TSI.

24 Nov. 24, 2007 Open House Attendees (2)

Concern that issue of existing lighting at terminal has not been addressed.

The VPA and TSI have reviewed a number of lighting concerns raised by local residents with respect to the existing terminal. TSI agreed to implement the following:

• a review of the existing lighting equipment and sources (based on reusing the existing pole locations)

• the feasibility of incorporating shielding, if appropriate

• re-familiarize the crane operators on the importance of ensuring the ship to shore gantry crane arm lights are off when not in operation and ensure that the automatic shutdown of the gantry arm lighting system is operating




VPA and TSI will continue to work with the community to reduce lighting impacts from the terminal.

25 Steve Kinsey, Unattributed (3) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern with existing train noise at port (shunting, wheels, engines).

Rail noise is expected to increase during operations by between 1dBA and 2dBA. Although increases of this level are not normally perceptible to the human ear, they would marginally increase existing levels. A Noise Management Plan will be implemented during operations to assess and reduce noise levels where possible.

26 Bob Campbell Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern with existing train noise (whistles). Train whistling at railway crossings is an important way to ensure the safety of those who use public railway crossings. In February 2007, the Roberts Bank Rail Corridor: Road/Rail Interface Study was completed. The purpose of the study was to prioritize the most beneficial locations for investment in the road-rail grade separations. Careful consideration was also given to selected road closures, network reconfigurations, and traffic management measures designed to maximize benefits to motorists, railways and neighbouring communities. In addition, benefits of investment in the road-rail grade separations will help to reduce the need for whistle warning systems at road-rail grade crossings. The study was a collaborative efforts among Transport Canada, Ministry of Transportation, GVTA, Greater Vancouver Gateway Council, City of Surrey, Township of Langley and the City of Langley, railways and VPA. For more information on the benefits of these




improvements, please visit the Transport Canada Media Release at: http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2007/07-gc024e.htm#bg Parties affected by rail-related noise will soon have additional recourse through the Canada Transportation Act (CTA). Proposed amendments to Section 95 of the CTA that deal with noise and vibration issues is awaiting Royal Assent and could come into force in the near future.

27 Unattributed Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over existing rat problem in Delta believed to be related to container ships.

Beyond the scope of the Application Terms of Reference for the Deltaport Third Berth Project, issued by the BC Environmental Assessment Office October 8, 2004. TSI has an ongoing contract with a pest management company to inspect the site for rodents. Recent inspections at the site do not indicate that there is a rodent problem at Deltaport. Cargo that is moved through Deltaport is not loaded or unloaded at the facility, instead, all cargo is contained within containers, which keeps the operations at the facility very clean. Please note that all ships, including container vessels, calling on Deltaport and the port of Vancouver install rodent guards on all moorage lines.

28 John Hatfield, Unattributed (1) Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in consideration of the Hoover-Naas route proposal.

Beyond the scope of the Deltaport Third Berth Project.




29 Ralph Howey

Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Concern over presence of coal dust at Point Roberts Marina.

Beyond the scope of the Deltaport Third Berth Project.

30 Arthur David Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Need for VPA and Gateway to work together. The Gateway Program’s South Fraser Perimeter Road is not a requirement of DP3. The Port, however, supports longer-term regional solutions to traffic congestion in Delta, including the Gateway Program’s South Fraser Perimeter Road, to address increased commuter and port related traffic in the region.

31 Steve Kinsey Nov. 24, 2007 Open House

Interest in continued and expanded VPA support of local youth and sporting activities.

VPA is committed to sharing its success with the communities it serves. Through our Community Investment Program, the Port strives to support the economic, social and environmental aspirations of our operating communities with a view to building sustainable futures together. VPA is proud to support the community of Delta through a number of different initiatives including community sponsorship, scholarships, outreach programming and ongoing community relations activities.

32 David Brown December 12, 2007 phone call

Noticed unwarranted increase in train whistles at night.

Suggested that individual contact CN and CP directly and speak with them regarding this issue. E-mail forwarded to VPA transportation department.

Documents

Deltaport Third Berth Project 2007 Issue Tracking and