Delmar Delaware Achieve Assessment Inventory - All Subjects

7/25/2019 Delmar Delaware Achieve Assessment Inventory - All Subjects

1/23

Achieve Assessment 5th Grade

ELA Math ELA Grade 5 Math Grade 5 ELA Grade 5 Math Grade 5 Math Grade 5 Social Studies Grade 5 Social Studies Grade 5 Science Grade Five Science Grade Five Science Grade Five Sc

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP SBAC SBAC Pre- Test

Performance Plus

Post-Test

Performance Plus

Pre-Test

Performance Plus

Post-Test

Performance Plus

Pre-Test

Performance Plus

Post-Test

Performance Plus

Pre-test

Performance Plus

Post Test

Performance Plus

M ea sur e C G oa l M

Entity requiring assessment

state SEAor other agency;dis trict;or school

District District District State State State State State State State State State State State St

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 5-8, 11 5-8, 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA 5 Math 5 ELA 5 ELA 5 Math 5 Math 5 Social Studies 5 Social Studies 5 Science Five Science Science ScWhich students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealsorequiredto

takeregularstate assessment

All All all all all all all all all all all all all a

Type of assessment summative;

interim/benchmark; formative; diagnostic

Benchmark Benchmark; Interim

Benchmark; Diagnostic

Benchmark; Interim


Summative Summative Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic Component Five

Diagnostic

Component Five

Diagnostic

Component Five

Diagnostic

C

D

Number of years assessment has been

administered in the district

5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3

To which content standards is the assessment

aligned? (source ofalignme ntverification )

CommonCoreState Standards (Independent review

by Dr.Anne Jones using StudentAchievement

Partners Assessment Eval.Tool)

Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Delaware State Content DE State Content Common Core and DE state

content standards

C

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudent knowl- edgeof ELA standards

inr eadingcomprehension

RTI Screener; ACAP Course

Placement, Presidential

Honors,

RTI Screener; ACAP

Course Placement,

Presidential Honors,

Data for school

evaluation

Data for school

Evaluation

DPAS II

Evaluation

D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D PA S I I Ev al uati on D

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformanceon stateassessment

andinforminstructional practice

RTI Services; Course

Placement


Placement

S cho ol R ati ng S cho ol R ati ng Te ac her R ati ng Te ac he r R ati ng Te ac he r R at ing T ea che r R ati ng Te ac her R ati ng Te ac her R at ing Te ac he r R ati ng T ea che r R ati ng Te ac he r R at ing T

Users of the assessment Districtassessmentstaff andteachers Ad min is tr at or s & Te ache rs Ad min is tr at or s & Te ache rs Te ach ers Te ach ers T ea che rs T ea che rs T eac he rs Te ach ers T ea che rs /A dm in is tra to rs T eac he rs /A dm ini st ra to rs Te ach ers /Ad min is tr at or s Te ach ers /

Administrators

Teachers/

Administrators

Te

ADo users of the assessment use it for its

intended use(s)?

Yes(district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes yes yes yes yes ye

To what degree do users of the

assessment find it useful or not useful?

1 not useful

2 somewhat useful 3 useful

4 very useful

Explain why.

2 district staff find it accurately predicts

performance on state assessment, but that the

results are not useful

for educators to inform instruction

Educators report MAP as

useful for instructional

placement decisions



placement decisions

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2

Type of administration Paperbooklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Computer-Based Computer Based Paper/Pencil Paper/Pencil Paper/Pencil Paper/Pencil Paper/ Pencil Paper/ Pencil Paper/ Pencil Paper/ Pencil Paper/ Pencil P

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click

and Pop; Graphing

Calculator TI-84; Common

Stimulus; Keyboard Entry;Drop Down; Turn & Slide;

Multiple

Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click

and Pop; Graphing


Stimulus; Keyboard Entry;Drop Down; Turn & Slide;

Multiple

Keyboard Entry;

Drop Down; Turn &

Slide; Multiple

Keyboard Entry Essay Essay Written

Responses

Written

Responses

Multiple choice and

short answer

Multiple choice and

short answer

multiple choice and

short written responses

Multiple choice and

short written

responses

Writing W

Accom modatio ns Brailleeditionof assessment Available;not usedto obtain

raw student performance data

Available;not usedto obtain


Available Available Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No N

Test Preparation Time (for teacher

proctors) beyond student test

administration time (including security

training, tech set-up, printing, scanning

bubble sheets, etc.)

one hour a day for six days (3

adminstrations) 18 hours

one hour a day for six days

(3 adminstrations) 18 hours

2.5 hours tech set up

6 hours training

2.5 hours 6 hours

training

80 hours 80 hours 12 hours 12 hours 18 hours 18 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150minutes(includes15minutesof instructionsread

aloudbyteacher)

180minutes eachtime (three

times a year)

180minutes eachtime (three

times a year)

10.5 hours 9 hours 3 -4 hours 3-4 hours 3-4 hours 3-4 hours 3-4 hours 3-4 hours 60 mins 60 mins 30 mins two times a year 30

Testing window 10/110/15and3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31;

4/1 - 5/31

9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31;

4/1 - 5/31

Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall/Spring T

Test frequency Giventwicea year,in Octoberand March Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring

Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring

Once per year once per year once per year once per year once per year once per year once per year once per year Once per year once per year twice a year si

Time between test administration and

results to users

24hoursfor rawdatat odistrict; 3weeksfor

analysis

24 hours for raw data to

district; 24 hours for

summary data via DSS in I-

Tracker at end of testing

window





window

4 months 4 months 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (North West

Evaluation Association)

NWEA (North West


SBAC SBAC SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard Teacher created T

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 42643 DOE -contract DOE -contract DOE -contract DOE -contract DOE -contract DOE-determined DOE-determined DOE-determined DOE-determined DOE-determined DOE-determined D

Entity that holds contract District District District DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE DOE n/a n/

Annual cost

(total and per student)

$38,000total, $19.00per student (grades 5-8) $13.50 per student for full

Math & ELA access (grades

5 - 12) at 1200 students

$13.50 per student for full



Substitutes

Paper/Pencil

Copies

Classroom Activity

Substitutes

Paper/Pencil

Copies

Classroom

Activity

P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P ap er fo r c op ie s P

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State State State State State State State State State n/a n/

Other Comments: loss ofvaluable

instructiontime

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Group Completing Form: Delmar Middle School Team FiveOptional Category: English Language Arts (e.g.,grade level, subject)


2/23


ELA Math Math Math ELA ELA Science 6th Science 6th Science 6th SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL S

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP Performance Plus Pre-Test Perfromance Plus Post-Test Performance Plus Pre-

Test

Perfromance Plus Post-

Test


Test


Test

TechnicalWriting Performance Plus Pre-

Test


Test

Common

Assessm



District District District State State State State State State State State State State

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 6 6 6 6 Grade 6 Grade 6 Grade Test 6 6 6 6

Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math Math Math ELA ELA Science Science Science SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL

Which students are eligible or required to take assessment? All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealsorequiredto

takeregularstate assessment

All All all all all all or Chosen Cohort A ll All All all eligible but only cohort

counts

alleligible but only cohort

counts

alleligibl

counts

Type of assessment summative; interim/benchmark;

formative; diagnostic

Benchmark Benchmark; Interim


Benchmark; Interim


t eac he r b en ch mark t eac he r b en ch mark t eac he r b en ch mark t each er b e nc hm ark T each er Be nc hm ark;

Diagnostic

Teacher Benchmark;

Diagnostic

B en ch ma rk t ea ch er be nc hm ar k t ea ch er be nc hm ar k t ea ch er

Number of years assessment has been administered in the

district

5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 1 year 1 year 1 year 1 year 3 3 3 3 years 3 years 1 year

To which content standards is the assessment aligned?

(source ofalignmen tverification)

CommonCoreState Standards (Independent review by

Dr.Anne Jones using Student Achievement Partners

Assessment Eval.Tool)

Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core Common Core and State

Standards

CommonCore and

State Standards

C om mo n C or e; N G SS C om mo n C or e; N G SS C om mo n C or e; N G SS D el aw ar e S ta te S t an da rd D el aw ar e S ta te S t an da rd C om mo

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudent knowl- edgeof ELA standards

inreadingcomprehension

RTI Screener; ACAP

Course Placement,




Honors,

DPAS II DPAS II DPAS II DPAS II Measure student

knowledge of 6th

grade Science

Standards for

Common Core and

NGSS/DPAS II

Measure student

knowledge of 6th

grade Science

Standards for Common

Core and NGSS/DPAS II

Measure student

knowledge of technical

writing specifically

experimental

designs/STEM

DPAS II

DPAS II DPAS II DPAS II

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELA performanceonstate assessment



Placement

RTI Services; Course Placement D PAS II DPAS II DPAS II DPAS II Predict Science

performance on state

assessment and

inform instructional

practice/DPAS II

Predict Science

performance on state

assessment and inform

instructional

practice/DPAS II

Predict Science

performance for technical

writing and inform

instruction

DPAS II

DPAS II DPAS II DPAS II

Users of the assessment Districtassessmentstaff andteachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &

Teachers

Administrators &

Teachers

District,Administration,&

Teachers

District,Administration,&

Teachers

Admnistrat ion,Teachers Administrators &

Teachers

Administrators &

Teachers

Administ

Do users of the assessment use it for its intended use(s)? Yes(district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

To what degree do users of the assessment find it

useful or not useful?

1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.


performance on state assessment, but that theresults are not useful




placement decisions

Educators report MAP as useful

for instructional placement

decisions

1-not useful 1-not useful 1 not useful 1- not useful 1 1 3 - Useful 1 not useful 1/2-some test

questions are

ambiguous

2-some

Type of administration Paperbooklet/scantron C omp ut er- bas ed C omp ut er- ba se d pa pe r- pe nci l-b ub bl e s he et s pa pe r-p enc il- bub bl e s he et s Pa pe r an dP enci l Pa pe ra nd Pe nc il B ub bl e s he ets & te ach er

gradedessays

Bubble sheets &teacher

gradedessays

Paper/TeacherGraded paper-penc il-bubble

sheets

paper-pencil-bubble

sheets

paper-pe

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click

and Pop; Graphing


Stimulus; Keyboard Entry;

Drop Down; Turn & Slide;

Multiple

Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and

Pop; Graphing Calculator TI-84;

Common Stimulus; Keyboard

Entry; Drop Down; Turn &

Slide; Multiple

Short answer and multiple

choice

Short answer and

multiple choice

Wri ti ng Pro mp t Wri ti ng Pro mp t S el ec te d respo nse &

essay

Selected response &

essay

essay Bubble sheet

teacher graded short

answer responses

Bubble sheet

teacher graded short

answer responses

Multipl

Possible

short an



Available;not usedto obtainraw

student performance data

no no No No According to IEP's and

504's

According toIEP's and

504's

According to IEP's and504's Not stated-Follow DCAS

accomodations

Not stated-Follow DCAS

accomodations

Not state

accomod

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors) beyond

student test administration time (including security

training, tech set-up, printing, scanning bubble sheets,

etc.)

90 minute 90 minute Print and staple packets-90 min,

print bubble sheets-30 min,

teacher guideline prep-30 min,

hand scoring-4.5 hours, scan

bubble sheets-60 min, create

spreadsheet of data-30 min,

analyze the data and selectcohort group-2 hours TOTAL--

10.5 hours

Print and staple packets-

90 min, print bubble

sheets-30 min, teacher

guideline prep-30 min,

hand scoring-2 hours,

scan bubble sheets-30

min, trouble shoot onlinekey discrepencies-3

hours, endter data into

spreadsheet-45 min,

analyze growth-75 min

TOTAL--10 hours

Printing - 45 min

Scoring - 15 hours

Analysis - 2 hours

Printing - 45 min

Scoring - 15 hours

Analysis - 2 hours

1 hour15 min. to print

booklet; 30 min. to print

scantron sheets

provided machine is

working; 15 min. to scan

once takien provided the

machine is working; 3hours per class of 30 for

grading essays and

calculating final grade

(20 hours for all of my 6

classes)

1 hour15 min. to print

booklet; 30 min. to print

scantron sheets

provided machine is

working; 15 min. to scan

once taking provided the

machine is working; 3hours per class of 30 for

grading essays and

calculating final grade

(20 hours for all of my 6

classes)

3 hours/6 classes of 30 = 18

hours

Printing Packets - 30

min Grading- 4

hours

Scanning/Bubble Sheets

- 60 min Excel Spread

Sheet/ Data Correlation

- 90 min TOTALTIME 7 hours

Printing Packets - 30

min Grading- 4

hours

Scanning/Bubble

Sheets - 60 min Excel

Spread Sheet/ Data

Correlation - 90 minTOTAL TIME 7 hours

2 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150minutes(includes15minutesof instructionsread

aloudbyteacher)

90 - 120 min 90 - 120 min 45 min 45 min 180 minutes 180 minutes 90 minutes/class (I teach 6

classes)

90minutes/class (I teach6

classes)

90 minutes 45 min 60 min 30-45 m

Testing window 10/110/15and3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31;

4/1 - 5/31

9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 -

5/31

September May September May 4/1-4/25 4/1-4/25 9/1-9/5; 3/15-3/20 September May Each Qu

Test frequency Giventwicea year,in OctoberandMarch Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring


fall/winter/spring

once in the fall once in the spring Once in the fall Once in the spring 2x/yr 2x/yr 2x/yr once in the fall once in the spring 4+ times

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE

Optional Category: English Language Arts (e.g.,grade level, subject)

Group Completing Form:DelmarMiddle SchoolTeam Six


3/23

Achieve Assessment 6th GradeELA Math Math Math ELA ELA Science 6th Science 6th Science 6th SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL S

Time between test administration and results to

users

24hoursfor rawdatato district; 3weeksfor

analysis





window


district; 24 hours for summary

data via DSS in I-Tracker at end

of testing window

1-2 weeks 1-2 weeks 2-3 weeks 2-3 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks not available 1-2 weeks 1 week

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (North West


NWEA (North West Evaluation

Association)

SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard DE Science

Coalition/State

DE Science

Coalition/State/SunGu

ard

Instructor/SunGuard State of DE Teacher

Created

SunGuard

State of DE Teacher

Created

SunGuard

SunGua

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined N/A N/A N/A

Entity that holds contract District District District State DOE State DOE State DOE State DOE State DOE State State N/A N/A N/A

Annual cost


$38,000total, $19.00per student (grades5-8) $13.50 per student for full




Math & ELA access (grades 5 -

12) at 1200 students

Copier and paper costs and

bubble sheet scanner

Copier and paper costs

and bubble sheet

scanner

Copier and Paper

costs to district

Copier and Paper

costs to district

Copies and paper costs Copies and paper costs Copies and paper costs Copier and paper

costs and bubble

sheet scanner

Copier and paper

costs and bubble

sheet scanner

Copier

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State State State State State State State State State

Other Comments: All questions from CCSS were

from number sense and

ratios and proportions only

(only 2 out of 5 domains

were represented), Pre-tests

formats were not consistent

among grades in item types

(MC,SCR, ECR) and values,

question validity of

test;(*Although sixth grade

has five Common core

domains, the test only covers

standards in two of them)

*Although sixth grade

has five Common core

domains, the test only

covers standards in two

of them * Scoring on

some of the test items

was excessive for the

quality of the question

while other more

complex questions had

a 1 point value.

* Verticial Alignment of

the Pre-Post test among

the middle school did

not have consistency as

to the make up of the

test items. *

Although we would

consider the test invalid

for many reasons, it did

have comparible

questions for both the

pre and post test.

* Focus was only on

the writing standards

* Older rubric was

used as opposed to

SBAC

* Focus was only

on the writing

standards

* Older rubric was

used as opposed to

SBAC

* Graphics did not

reproduce well on

student tests

* Several Questions

were hard to

understand

* Several questions

seemed vague

* Graphics did not

reproduce well on

student tests

* Several Questions

were hard to

understand

* Several questions

seemed vague

* Scoring on some of the test

items was excessive for the

quality of the question while

other more complex

questions had a 1 point

value. * Verticial

Alignment of the Pre-Post

test among the middle school

did not have consistency as

to the make up of the test

items.

* 6.NS.5 and 6.NS.6

allotted for 4 out of the

14 questions yet in the

content for the year,

the percentge was

minimal for instruction

of these concepts when

compared to many

other standards.



4/23


ELA Math Science 7 Science 7 Science 7 Science 7 Social Studies 7 Social Studies 7 ELA 7 ELA 7 Math 7 Math 7

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP DE State Pre/Post Test

Performance Plus

TechnicalWriting ExperimentalDesign Inquiry (graphing) Performance Plus Pre-test Performance Plus Post-test Performance Plus Pre-test Performance Plus Post-test Performance Plus Pre-test Perform



District District District State School School School State State State State State State

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7 Grade 7Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math Science Science Science Science Social Studies Social Studies ELA ELA Math Math

Which students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealso

requiredtotake regularstateassessment

All All All All All All All All All except Life Skills All except life skills All except Life Skills All exce


formative;diagn ostic

Benchmark Benchmark;Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Benchmark;Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Formative (pre),Summative

(post)

Formative (pre),

Summative (post)

Formative (pre),Summative

(post)

Formative (pre),

Summative (post)

F orm ati ve S um ma tiv e F orm at iv e w ri ti ng p re te st S um mat iv e w ri ti ng po st -t es t F orm ati ve S um ma

Number of years assessment has been administered

in the district

5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1



CommonCoreState Standards (Independent

review by Dr.Anne Jones using Student

Achievement Partners Assessment Eval.Tool)

C om mo n Co re C om mo n Co re D E st at e s ci en ce st an da rd s D E st at e s ci en ce st an da rd s D E st at e s ci en ce st an da rd s D E st at e s ci en ce st an da rd s D E s ta te so ci al s tu di es

standards

DEstate socialstudies

standards

Writing standards depending

onthe prompt andtask

Writing standards depending

onthe prompt andtask

Common Core Commo

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudentknowl-edgeof ELAstandards

inreadingcomprehension

RTI Screener;ACAP Course

Placement,PresidentialHonors,


Placement,PresidentialHonors,

Measure grade 7student

understanding ofgrade-levelexpectations forspecfic

standards

DPAS II

Measure student

knowledge oftechnicalwriting specifically

experimental

designs/STEM

DPAS II

Measure student knowledge

ofexperimentaldesign/STEM

DPAS II

Measure student ability to

create andinterpretgraphs ofscience data

DPAS II

Measure student's prior

socialstudies knowledgepriorto instruction

DPAS II

TeacherEvaluation

(Component 5)DPAS II

Teacherevaluation


Teacherevaluation


Teacherevaluation


Teache

DPAS II

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment PredictELAperformanceon stateassessment


RTI Services;Course P lacement RTI Services;Course P lacement Monitorstudent mastery of

grade-levelcontent;teacher

accountability

Monitorstudent mastery

ofgrade-level content;

teacheraccountability

Monitorstudent mastery of

grade-levelcontent;teacher

accountability

Monitorstudent mastery



Monitorstudent's mastery



Monitorstudent's mastery



Teacherevaluation

(Component 5)

Teacherevaluation

(Component 5)

Teacherevaluation

(Component 5)

Teache

Users of the assessment Districtassessmentstaff andteachers A dm in is tr at or s & T e ac he rs A dm in is tr at or s & T e ac he rs D is tr ic t, A d mi ni st ra ti on , &

Teachers

Admnistration,Teachers Admnistration,Teachers Admnistration,Teachers Administration,Teachers Administration,Teachers District assessment staffand

ELA teachers tomeasure

student progress

District assessment staffand

ELA teachers tomeasure

student progress

District assessment staffand

mathteachers tomeasure

student progress

District

teacher

progres

Do users of the assessment use it for its intended

use(s)?

Yes(district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

To what degree do users of the assessment find it


1 notuseful

2 s om ew ha t us ef ul 3 us ef ul

4 very useful

Explain why.

2 district stafffind itaccurately predicts

performance on state assessment, butthat the

results are notuseful

for educators to informinstruction

Educators report MAP as usefulfor

instructionalplacement decisions

Educators report MAP as usefulfor

instructionalplacement decisions

Item analysis ofsome

questions caninform teaching

fornext year;some items are

not useful

2 2 2 2 2 1- time demands with prep,

administration,andscoring;

does not meet 2source

criteria requiredby SBAC;

does not support SBAC format

1-time demands withprep,




does not support SBAC format

1-time demands withprep,




does not support SBAC

format

1-time

adminis

not me

require

support

Type of administration Paperbooklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Bubble sheets &teacher

gradedessays

Paper Paper Paper Paper Paper Handwritten/Handscored Handwritten/Handscored Paper Paper

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot;Drag/Drop;Click andPop;

Graphing CalculatorTI-84;Common

Stimulus;KeyboardEntry; Drop

Down;Turn& Slide;Multiple

Hot Spot;Drag/Drop;Click andPop;

Graphing CalculatorTI-84;Common

Stimulus;KeyboardEntry; Drop

Down;Turn& Slide;Multiple

Selected response & essay essay essay graph Selected response Selected response Full write (narrative,

informative,orargument)

Fullwrite (narrative,

informative,orargument)

SelectedResponse and

ConstructedResponse

Selecte

Constru

Accom modatio ns Brailleeditionof assessment Available;not usedto obtainraw




Re-readand/orexplain

instructions;extendedtime





Re-readand/or explain

instructions;extended


instructions

Re-readand/ore xplain

instructions

IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors) beyond

student test administration time (including security

training,tech set-up,printing,scanning bubble

sheets,etc.)

90 min 90 min 3 hours (print pre and post

booklet forall students);30

min. toprint scantronsheets

providedmachine is working;

30 min. toscan once taking

providedthe machine is

working;3 hours perclass of

30for grading essays and

calculating finalgrade (20

hours forall ofmy 6 classes)

3hours/6classes of30 = 18

hours

3hours/6classes of30 = 18

hours

3hours/6classes of 30=

18hours

3 hours 3 hours 6 hours 6 hours 6 hours 6 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150minutes(includes15minutesof

instructionsreadaloudby teacher)

90 - 120 min 90 - 120 min 90 minutes/class (I teach 6

classes)

90 minutes 90 minutes 90 minutes 90 minutes/2 classes= 180

perclass * 6classes=

1,080minutes

90minutes/2classes= 180

perclass * 6 classes= 1,080

minutes

4-5 hours 4-5 hours 4-5 hours 4-5 hou

Testing window 10/110/15and 3/13/15 9/1-10/31;12/1-1/31;4/1-5/31 9/1-10/31;12/1-1/31;4/1-5/31 Pre:week one ofschool;Post:

thirdweek inMay

Pre: week one ofschool;

Post:thirdweek inMay





2 nd w ee k o f sc ho ol 2 nd w ee k o f sc ho ol f ir st t wo w ee ks o f Se pt em be r M ay 1 -2 2 f ir st t wo w ee ks o f Se pt em be r M a y 1 4

Test frequency Giventwicea year,in Octoberand March Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring


fall/winter/spring

2x/yr 2x/yr 2x/yr 2x/yr 1x per year 1x per year 1x per year 1x per year 1x per year 1x per y

Time between test administration and results tousers

24hoursforrawdatatodistrict;3 weeksforanalysis

24hours forraw data todistrict;24hours forsummary data via DSS inI-

Trackerat endof testing window

24hours forraw data todistrict;24hours forsummary data via DSS inI-


2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks 1 week 1 week 2-3 weeks for handscoring 2-3 weeks for handscoring 1-2 weeks 1-2 wee

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (NorthWest Evaluation

Association)

NWEA (NorthWest Evaluation

Association)

DEScience Coalition/State

SunGuard

Instructor Instructor Instructor SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGua

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State de

Entity that holds contract District District District State State State State State State State State State State

Annual c ost

(totaland per student)

$38,000total,$19.00per student(grades5-8) $13.50perstudent forfull Math&

ELA access (grades 5- 12)at 1200

students

$13.50perstudent forfull Math&

ELA access (grades 5- 12)at 1200

students

C opi er /Pa pe rco sts C op ie r/ Pa pe r co st s Co pi er /P ap er cos ts C opi er /P ap er cos ts C op ie r/ Pa pe r co st s C opi er /P ap er cos ts C op ie r/ Pa pe r cos ts C op ie r/ Pa pe r cos ts C opi er /Pa pe rco sts C opi er /

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State State State State State State State State

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Group Completing Form:DelmarMiddle SchoolTeam Seven



5/23

Achieve Assessment 7th GradeOther Comments: Needmore computers toimprove

schedule

Needmore computers toimprove

schedule


6/23


ELA Math Performance Plus ELA Performance Plus Math Performance Plus Science (Goal B) Performance Plus Social Studies

GoalB

Science-MathematicalModels Goal

C

Performance Plus SocialStudies

(Writing GoalC)

Algebra 1Mid-term &Final Exa

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP Performance Plus Tests ELA (Pre & Post) Performance Plus Tests Math (Pre &

Post)

Performance Plus Tests Science (Pre &

Post)

Performance Plus Tests Social

Studies (Pre &Post)

MathematicalModels Pre &Post

Test-Science

Performance Plus Tests SocialStudies

(Pre &Post)

Algebra 1Mid-term &Final Exa



District District District State State State State State State District

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5-8 Grades 5-8 Grades 5-8 Grades 5-8 Grades 5-8 Grades 5-8 Grades 8-12

Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA Math Science Social Studies Science Social Studies Algebra 1Which students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealsorequired

totake regularstateassessment

All All All All All are eligible; 2 of 6 classes (approx

65students)assessed

Allare eligible;1of 6classes

(approx 23students)assessed

Allare eligible;2of 6classes (approx

65students)assessed

Allare eligible;3of 6classes (approx

100students)assessed

Allare eligible;3 of6 classes (ap

students)assessed

Type of assessment summative; interim/bench-

mark; formative; diagnostic

Benchmark Benchmark; Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Benchmark; Interim


Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark

Number of years assessment has been administered

in the district

5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 2014-2015 2014-2015 2013-2015 (2 years) 2013-2015 (2 years) 2013-2015 (2 years) 2013-2015 (2 years)





Achievement Partners Assessment Eval.Tool)

Common Core Common Core Common Core (writing &language

standards)

CommonCore DEState Standards,NGSS (Common

Core)

DEState Standards,CommonCoreDE State Standards,CommonCore DEState Standards,CommonCore CommonCore

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudent knowl- edgeof ELA

standards inreadingcomprehension


Placement, Presidential Honors,



Honors,

Measure B in lieu of DCAS for DPAS

II

Measure B in lieu of DCAS for

DPAS II

Measure B Component V

DPAS II

Measure B Component V

DPAS II

Measure C Component V

DPAS II

Measure C Component V

DPAS II

Measure student acheivem

year and end of year cumau

the course

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformanceon state

assessment andinform instructional practice

RTI Services; Course Placement RTI Services; Course

Placement

Teacher Evaluation for DPAS II

Component V


Component V


Component V

Teacher Evaluation for DPAS

II Component V


Component V


Component V

Student placement

Users of the assessment Districtassessmentstaff andteachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Teachers


use(s)?

Yes(district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

To what degree do users of the assessment

find it useful or not useful?

1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.


performance on state assessment, but that

the results are not useful


Educators report MAP as useful for

instructional placement decisions



placement decisions

1- covers very few Common Core

standards for the grade level;

subjectively graded by the teacher

being evaluated

1- covers very few Common Core

standards for the grade level;

subjectively graded by the

teacher being evaluated

2- accurately predicts

performance on the state

assessment, but results are not

useful to drive instruction

2- accurately predicts

performance on the state

assessment, but results are

not useful to drive instruction

3- helps show growth in areas

where models are used

throughout the year

4--results are more realistic and

useful in driving instruction with

the writing component

4--results are very useful in

identifying students' needs

accuracy of their placemen

mathematics courses

Type of administration Paperbooklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Paper booklet Paper booklet, scantron Paper booklet, scantron Paper booklet, scantron Paper booklet Paper booklet Paper booklet

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and

Pop; Graphing Calculator TI-84;

Common Stimulus; Keyboard Entry;

Drop Down; Turn & Slide; Multiple

Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and

Pop; Graphing Calculator TI-

84; Common Stimulus;

Keyboard Entry; Drop Down;

Turn & Slide; Multiple

Full-write es say selected res ponse & short

response

selected response & short

response

selected response & short

response

graphing, analyzing &

summarizing

f ul l- wr it e e ss ay s el ec te d r es po ns e & s ho rt a

Accom modatio ns Brailleeditionof assessment Available;not usedtoobtain raw student

performance data



IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors)

beyond student test administration time

(including security training, tech set-up, printing,

scanning bubble sheets, etc.)

3 hours 3 hours 10 hours each = 20 hours total for both

tests

8 hours each= 16 hours total for

both tests


both tests


both tests


both tests


both tests

3 hours each= 9 hours total

Test administration time (for students) 150minutes(includes15minutesof instructions

readaloudby teacher)

27hours (3hrs/administrat ion) 27hours (3hrs/administrat ion) 3hours foreachtest= 6hours perc lass=

18hours total

1.5hours each= 3hours perclass= 9

hours total


hours total

1.5hours each= 3hours perclass=

3hours total

30minutes each= 1hours eachclass=

2hours total


hours total

2hours each= 4hours perclass=

total

Testing window 10/110/15and3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 -

5/31

September 2014 (Pre-Test) May

2015 (Post-test)


2015 (Post-test)


2015 (Post-test)

September 2014 (Pre-Test)

May 2015 (Post-test)

September 2014 (Pre-Test)

November 2014 (Post-test)


2015 (Post-test)

January 2015 (Mid-term) M

(Final exam)

Test frequency Giventwicea year,in Octoberand March Three times peryear: fall/winter/spring Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring

2 ti me s pe ry ear fa ll /s pr ing 2 ti me s p er ye ar fa ll/ spr ing 2 ti me s p er ye ar fal l/ sp ri ng 2 ti me s pe ry ear fa ll /s pr ing 2 ti me s p er ye ar 2 ti me s pe ry ear fa ll /s pr ing 2 tim es pe r ye ar wi nt er/ spr in g

Time between test administration and results

to users

24hoursforrawdatatodistrict;3 weeksfor

analysis

24hours forraw data todistrict;24hours

forsummary data via DSS inI-Trackerat

endof testing window

24hours forraw data todistrict;24

hours forsummary data via DSS inI-


3days aftergrading is completed;then

immediate afterresults are enteredinto

Performance Plus

1day aftergrading is completed;then

immediate afterresults are entered

intoPerformance Plus

1day after grading is completed;then

immediate afterresults are entered

intoPerformance Plus

1day after grading is completed;

thenimmediate afterresults are

enteredinto Performance Plus

1day aftergrading is completed 1day aftergrading is completed 1day aftergrading is completed


Association)

NWEA (NorthWest Evaluation

Association)

Performance Plus

SunGuard

Performance Plus

SunGuard

Performance Plus

SunGuard

Performance Plus

SunGuard

Peformance Plus generatedgoals/

teachercreatedassessment/SunGuard

Performance Plus generated

goals/teachercreated/SunGuard

teachergenerated

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined State determined n/a

Entity that holds contract District District District State State State State State State District

Annual cost


$38,000total, $19.00per student (grades 5-

8)

$13.50 per student for full Math &

ELA access (grades 5 - 12) at 1200

students


Math & ELA access (grades 5 -

12) at 1200 students

C op ie r an d pape r expe nses C op ie r and p ap er e xpe nses C op ie r and p ap er e xp en se s C op ie r an d pape r expe nses C op ie r and p ap er e xpe nses C op ie r an d pape r expe nses C op ie r and p ap er e xp en se s

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State State State State State n/a

Other Comments: Needmore computers toimprove

schedule

Needmore computers toimprove

schedule

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Group Completing Form: Delmar MiddleSc hoolTeam Eight



7/23

Achieve Assessment HS Math

ELA Math Pre-test Post-test Midterm Exams Final Exams

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP Performance Plus subject Pre-test Performance Plus subject Post-test District created exams District created exams


state SEA or other agency; district; or school

District District District State, District State, District District District

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12

Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math Math Math Math Math

Which students are eligible or required to take assessment? All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealsorequired

tot akeregular stateassessment

All All all all all Students who do not meeet the

exemption policy

Type of assessment summative; interim/benchmark; formative;

diagnostic


Diagnostic

Benchmark; Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Pre-test Post-test diagnostic Diagnostic

Number of years assessment has been administered in the

district

5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 3 years 3 years 20 years 20 years


(source of alignment verification)

CommonCoreStateStandards(Independent

review by Dr. Anne Jones using Student

Achievement Partners Assessment Eval. Tool)

Common Core Common Core Algebra, Geometry, Functions,

statististics, number concepts

Algebra, Geometry, Functions,






Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudent knowl- edgeof ELA standardsin

reading comprehension





create baseline data to see growth

DPAS II

see gro wt h/ DPAS I I A sse ss s tu de nt l earni ng assess s tu de nt l earn in g

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformanceonstate assessment and

informinstructional practice

RTI Services; Course Placement R TI Services; Course Pla cement create baseline data to see growth see growth See student learning See student learning

Users of the assessment District assessment staff andteachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators & Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers TeachersDo users of the assessment use it for its intended use(s)? Yes (district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes no yes yes yes

To what degree do users of t he assessment find it useful or

not useful?

1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.









1-takes a lot of time, but does not show

levels of achievement to see how

standards are being assessement. It is

only being done for component 5

2- somewhat useful. It does show

growth for the few standards we are

assessing.

4- Allows students to learn to prepare

for a large cumulative test in preparation

for college. Gives teacher information

as to what standards were learned well,

and which standards still need to be

addressed.

3- The students who are required to take

the test continue to learn to prepare for

large cumulative test.

Type of administration Paper booklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based paper paper paper paper

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and Pop;

Graphing Calculator TI-84; Common

Stimulus; Keyboard Entry; Drop

Down; Turn & Slide; Multiple

Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and Pop;


Stimulus; Keyboard Entry; Drop

Down; Turn & Slide; Multiple

short answer short answer Muliple choice and short answer Muliple choice and short answer

Accommodati ons Brailleedition of assessment Available; not used to obtain raw


Available; not used to obtain raw


any accommodations listed on IEP any accommodations l isted on IEP any accommodations listed on IEP any accommodations l isted on IEP

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors) beyond student

test administration time (including security training, tech set-

up, printing, scanning bubble sheets, etc.)

90 min 90 min approximately 2 hours per teacher (10

hours total)

approximately 3 hours per teacher (15

hours total)


hours total-1 hour per class per teacher)


hours total)



90-120 minutes three times a year (90 minutes per

child)

45 minutes on average for each class

(19 classes)

1350 minutes for all students in 19

classes to complete the test

115 minutes per students per class 115 minutes per students per class

Testing window 10/110/15and3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 Sep-14 May-15 Jan-15 Jun-15

Test frequency Giventwice ayear, inOctober andMarch Three times per year:

fall/winter/spring

Three times per year:

fall/winter/spring

one time per year one time per year one time per year one time per year

Time between test administration and results to users 24hoursfor rawdatat odistrict; 3weeksfor

analysis

24 hours for raw data to district; 24

hours for summary data via DSS in I-

Tracker at end of testing window




48 hours 48 hours 48 hours 24 hours

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (North West Evaluation

Association)


Association)

Performance Plus subject Pre-test Performance Plus subject Post-test none none

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State determined none none

Entity that holds contract District District District State State none noneAnnual cost


$38,000total, $19.00per student (grades 5-8) $13.50 per student for full Math &


students

$13.50 per student for full Math &


students

paper and copier expenses paper and copier expenses paper paper

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State funds State funds district funds district funds

Other Comments:

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Group Completing Form:HS Math

Optional Category: English Language Arts (e.g., grade level, subject)


8/23

Achieve Assessment HS ELA

ELA Math

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP ELA Pre-test ELA Post-test Midterm/Final ExamEntity requiring assessment


District District District DPAS DPAS District

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math ELA ELA ELAWhich students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All students in these grades who are also required

to take regular state assessmentAll All All All Students who do not meet

the exemption policy




Diagnostic

Benchmark; Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Benchmark, component V Benchmark, Component V Diagnostic

Number of years assessment has been adminis tered in

the district

5 years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011


(source of alignment verification)

Common Core State Standards (Independent

review by Dr. Anne Jones using Student

Achievement Partners Assessment Eval. Tool)

Common Core Common Core ELA

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measure student knowledge of ELAstandards in


RTI Screener; ACAP Course Placement,




Teacher evaluation

DPAS II

Teacher evaluation

DPAS II

Assess Student Learning

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformance on state assessment

and informinstructional practice

RTI Services; Course Placement RTI Services; Course Placement DPAS II Component V DPAS II Component V See Student Learning

Users of the assessment District assessment staff and teachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators Administrators TeachersDo users of the assessment use it for its i ntended

use(s)?

Yes (district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes yes

To what degree do users of the assessment find it useful

or not useful?

1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.









Teachers-2 Teachers -2 3

Type of administration Paper booklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Paper/pencil Paper/pencil Paper/pencilItem type(s) Selected response Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and Pop;


Stimulus; Keyboard Entry; Drop Down;






T ex t- ba se d wri tin g pro mp t Te xt -bas ed w ri ti ng p rom pt Mu lti pl e Ch oi ce /S ho rt

Answer/Essay

Acco mmod ations Braille edition of assessment Available; not used to obtain raw student

performance data

Available; not used to obtain raw


None None 504/IEP

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors) beyondstudent test administration time (including security

training, tech set-up, printing, scanning bubbl e sheets,

etc.)

90 minutes 90 minutes 10 minutes per student (multiply this bynumber in cohort 25-100+)

10 minutes per student (multiplythis by number in cohort 25-100+)

2 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150 minutes (includes 15 minutes of instructions

read aloud by teacher)

Three times per year: fall/winter/spring-

two 90-minute testing period EACH

session

Three times per year:

fall/winter/spring- two 90-minute

testing period EACH session

On e 9 0- mi nu te cl as s pe ri od On e 9 0- mi nu te cl ass pe rio d 9 0 t o 1 20 mi nut es

Testing window 10/110/15 and 3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 Fall Spring winter/springTest frequency Given twice a year, in October and March Three times per year: fall/winter/spring Three times per year:

fall/winter/spring

One time per year One time per year 2 time per year

Time between test administration and results to users 24 hours for rawdata to district; 3 weeks for

analysis

24 hours for raw data to district; 24 hours

for summary data via DSS in I-Tracker at

end of testing window




The time that it takes to hand-score The time that it takes to hand-score 24 to 48 hours

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (North West Evaluation

Association)


Association)

SunGuard SunGuard n/a

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State determined n/a

Entity that holds contract District District District State State n/a

Annual c ost


$38,000 total, $19.00 per student (grades 5-8) $13.50 per student for full Math & ELA

access (grades 5 - 12) at 1200 students

$13.50 per student for full Math & ELA


Copier and Paper Copier and Paper Copier and Paper

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State District

Other Comments:

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Group Completing Form:HS ELA

Optional Category: English Language Arts (e.g., grade level, subject)


9/23

Achieve Assessment HS Science

ELA Math Science Science Science Science

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP PreTest/ Perfomance Plus Posttest/Performance Plus Mid-Term Final/summative



District District District State State District District

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 9-11 Grades 9-11 Grades 9-12 Grades 9-12

Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math Physical Science, Biology, Chemistry Physical Science,Biology,Chemistry All Science All Science

Which students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealsorequiredto

takeregular stateassessment

All All All All All All



Benchmark Benchmark; Interim Benchmark; Diagnostic Benchmark; Interim Benchmark;

Diagnostic

Pretest Posttest Mid-term/summative Final/summative



5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 2 2 30 plus years 30 plus years


aligned? (source of alignment verification)

CommonCoreStateStandards(Independent review

by Dr. Anne Jones using Student Achievement

Partners Assessment Eval. Tool)

Common Core Common Core Delaware State Science Standards Delaware State Science Standards Delaware State Science Standards Delaware State Science Standards

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudent knowl- edgeof ELA standardsin






Teacher Accountability/Student Growth

DPAS II

Teacher Accountability/Student Growth

DPAS II

Measure student content mastery/college

ready

Measure student content

mastery/college ready

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformanceonstate assessment and

informinstructional practice

RTI Services; Course Placement RTI Services; Course Placement DPAS II Comp. 5 DPAS II Comp. 5 Semester grade calculation/college ready Semester grade calculation/college

ready

Users of the assessment District assessment staff andteachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators & Teachers Science Teachers/Administrators Science Teachers/Admin All teachers All teachers


use(s)?

Yes (district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

To what degree do users of t he assessment find it


1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.









1 - this test serves no purpose except to determine a

teachers component 5 rating and unfortunately these

tests are very poorly designed.

1 - this test serves no purpose except to determine a

teachers component 5 rating and unfortunately these

tests are very poorly designed.

3-this test is a good indication of concept

mastery and is based on material actually

taught in the class. Students also have

practice taking lengthy exams that they may

see in college.

3-this test is a good indication of

concept mastery and is based on

material actually taught in the class.

Students also have practice taking

lengthy exams that they may see in

college.

Type of administration Paper booklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Paper Booklet/scantron Paper Booklet/scantron Paper Booklet Paper Booklet

Item type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and Pop;


Stimulus; Keyboard Entry; Drop Down; Turn

& Slide; Multiple





Multiple Choice/Free res ponse Multiple Choice/Free Response Multiple Choice/Free Response Multiple Choice/Free Response

Accommodati ons Brailleedition of assessment Available; not used to obtain raw studentperformance data

Available; not used to obtain raw studentperformance data

Reading of test/IEP acc omodations Reading of Test/IEP accomoda tions IEP Accomodations /504 IEP Accomodations/504

Test Preparation Time (for teacher pr octors)

beyond student test administration time (including

security training, tech set-up, printing, scanning

bubble sheets, etc.)

90 minutes 90 minutes Test Prep: 2hours, Grading: 7 hours, Scanning and

data analysis: 2 hours per teacher

Test Prep: 2hours, Grading: 7 hours, Scanning and

data analysis: 2 hours per teacher

Test Prep: 2 hours, Grading: 10 hours,

per teacher

Test Prep: 2 hours, Grading: 10 hour

per teacher



90-120 minutes 90-120 minutes 60-90 min. 60-90 min. 60-90 mins. 60-90 mins.

Testing window 10/110/15and3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 Aug-Sept May January June

Test frequency Giventwicea year, inOctober andMarch Three times per year: fall/winter/spring Three times per year: fall/winter/spring 1 time per year 1 time per year 1 time per year 1 time per year

Time between test administration and results to

users

24hoursfor rawdatato district; 3weeksfor analysis 24 hours for raw data to district; 24 hours

for summary data via DSS in I-Tracker at end

of testing window

24 hours for raw data to district; 24 hours

for summary data via DSS in I-Tracker a t

end of testing window

1 t o 2 we eks de pe nd in g o n g ra di ng . 1 t o 2 we ek s de pe ndi ng o n g ra di ng . 1 we ek d ep endi ng on g ra di ng 1 we ek de pe ndi ng o n g ra din g

Vendor Tests4Schools NWEA (North West Evaluation Association) NWEA (North West Evaluation

Association)

State State

Contract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined State Determined n/a n/a

Entity that holds contract District District District State State n/a n/a

Annual cost


$38,000total, $19.00per student (grades 5-8) $13.50 per student for full Math & ELA


$13.50 per student for full Math & ELA


Copier and Paper costs Copier and Paper costs Copier and Paper costs Copier and Paper costs

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds State State District District

Other Comments:

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - SAMPLE Delmar HS Science Achieve Assessment Review 61515Optional Category: English Language Arts (e.g., grade level, subject)


10/23

Achieve Assessment HS School Social Studies

ELA Math Civics Geography Economics Personal Finance Economics and Personal

Finance

Economics andPersonal

Finance

American History American History American History AP US History World History

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP Pre/Post Test

Performance Plus

Pre/post test

Performance Plus

Pre/post test

Performance Plus

Pre/post test

Performance Plus

Midterm Final Exam Pre/post

Performance Plus

Midterm Exam Final Exam Final Exam Pre / Post Test World

History

Performance Plus


state SEAor other agency;district;or

school

District District District State State State State District District State District District College Board District / teacher

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 9 9 All students All students all students all students All students All students All students all students grade 12Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math Civics Geography Economics Personal Finance Economics and Personal

Finance

Economics andPersonal

Finance

A me ri can Hi sto ry A me ri ca nH is to ry A me ric an Hi st or y Am er ican H is tor y Wor ld Hi sto ry ( gr ade

12)Which students are eligible or required to

take assessment?

All studentsinthesegradeswhoarealso

requiredtotake regularstateassessment

All All All All We are required to

name a cohort,but I

require allstudents to

take the test

We are requiredto name

a cohort,but I require all

students totake the test

all students all students We are required to name

a cohort,but I give the

assessment toall

students

All students All students Students enrolled in

AP US History

All

Type of assessment summative;

interim/benchmark;forma tive;diagnos tic

Benchmark Benchmark;Interim

Benchmark;Diagnostic

Benchmark;Interim

Benchmark;Diagnostic

Diagnostic/summative

DPAS II

Diagnostic/summative

DPAS II

Benchmark

DPAS II

Benchmark

DPAS II

Summative Summative Benchmark

DPAS II

Summative Summative Summative Benchmark

DPAS II



5years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 5 years 5 years 5 years 5 years 10+ years 10+ years 5 years 10+ years 10+ years

To which content standards is the

assessment aligned? (source ofalign ment

verification)



Achievement Partners Assessment Eval.

Tool)

Common Core Common Core Social Studie s GLES Social Studies G LES DOE Economics Conte nt

Standards 1-4

DOEPersonal Finance

Content Standards 1-4

DOEeconomic content

standards 1-4;DOEpersonal

finance content standards 1-

4

DOEeconomiccontent

standards 1-4;DOEpersonal

finance content standards 1-4

DOEHistory content

standards 1-4

DOEhistory content

standards 1-4

DOEhistory content

standards 1-4

College Board

Framework

content standards

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measurestudentknowl-edgeof ELA

standardsinreadingcomprehension


Placement,Presidential

Honors,


Placement,Presidential

Honors,

Component 5 Component 5 Benchmark growth of

individualstudents over

course ofyear

Benchmark growthof

individualstudents over

the course ofthe year

Evaluate the students

understanding ofthe content

standards andadditional

classroom activities as they

relate tothe DOEcontent

standards


understanding ofthe content

standards andadditional

classroom activities as they

relate tothe DOEcontent

standards

Benchmark growthof

students overcourse of

year


understanding ofconcepts

taught inmy curriculum


understanding ofconcepts

taught inmy curriculum

Evaluate students

understanding ofUS

history at a college

level

g ro wt h g oa l( s)

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment PredictELAperformanceon stateassessment


RTI Services;Course

Placement

RTI Services;Course

Placement

T ea ch er E v al ua ti on T ea ch er E v al ua ti on For ma ti ve a ss es sm en t

andevaluation

Formative assessment

andevaluation

Summative,student scores

are 10% oftotalgrade

Summative,student scores

are 10% oftotal grade

Formative assessment

andevaluation

Summative Summative Summative growth goals

Users of the assessment Districtassessmentstaff andteachers Administrators &Teachers Administrators &Teachers Adminsitrators and

Teachers

Adminstrationand

Teachers

Adminstration,teacher Administration,teacher AdmistrationandTeacher AdmistrationandTeacher Administrationand

teacher

Administrationandteacher Administrationandteacher Student,Admin,

Teacher

Administrators &

Teachers

Do users of the assessment use it for its

intended use(s)?

Yes(district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes

To what degree do users of the

assessment find it useful or not useful?

1 notuseful

2 s om ew ha t us ef ul 3 us ef ul

4 very useful

Explain why.

2 districtstaff find itaccu rately predicts

performance on state assessment,but that

the results are notuseful

for educators to informinstruction


usefulfor instructional

placement decisions


usefulfor instructional

placement decisions

1 1 1: In general the

assessment is not useful

as a formative

assessment andis a

poorassessment of

growthand knowledge

2: Ingeneralthe

assessment is not useful

as a formative assessment

but is somewhat usefulas

anassessment ofgrowth

andknowledge

4: Ingeneralthe students

are heldaccountable tothe

content standards through

specificassessment methods

usedin the class andrelevant

torequired understandings

ofinstruction.

4: Ingeneral the students are

heldaccountable tothe

content standards through

specificassessment methods

usedin the class andrelevant

torequired understandings of

instruction.

1: the assessment is not

usefulas a formative

assessment anddoes not

reflect how I assess in

my class

4: Students are investedin

this assessment andit

accurately reflects content

taught inmy class

4: Students are investedin

this assessment andit

accurately reflects content

taught inmy class

n/a 1

Type of administration Paperbooklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Bubble Sheets Bubble Sheets paper/scantron Paper/scantron Paper/computer based Paper/computer based Paper/scantron paper paper paper paper

booklet/scantronItem type(s) Selectedresponse Hot Spot;Drag/Drop;Click

andPop; Graphing Calculator

TI-84;CommonStimulus;

KeyboardEntry;Drop Down;

Turn&Slide;Multiple

Hot Spot;Drag/Drop;Click

andPop; Graphing

CalculatorTI-84;Common

Stimulus;KeyboardEntry;

DropDown;Turn& Slide;

Multiple

SelectedResponse, short

answer

SelectedResponse, short

answer

multiple choice,short

answer

m ul ti pl e c ho ic e Mul ti pl e c ho ic e, s ho rt

answer,matching,data

basedquestions,multiple

answer

Multiple choice,short answer,

matching,data based

questions,multiple answer

Multiple choice,short

answer


answer,matching,open

endedresponse


answer,matching,open

endedresponse


answer,free response,

DBQ

multiple choice &short

answer


raw student performance

data

Available;not usedto

obtainraw student

performance data

IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 IEP/504 Available none available available none available

Test Preparation Time (for teacher

proctors) beyond student test

administration time (including security

training,tech set-up,printing, scanning

bubble sheets,etc.)

90 minutes 90 minutes 16 hours 16 hours 8 hours 8 hours 2 hours 2 hours 8 hours 2 hours 2 hours 8 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150minutes(includes15minutesof

instructionsreadaloudby teacher)

90-120 min 90-120 mn 90 minutes 90 minutes 90 minutes 90 minutes 90 90 90 minutes 90 minutes 90 minutes 3 hours 90 minutes

Testing window 10/110/15and 3/13/15 9/1-10/31;12/1-1/31;4/1-

5/31

9/1-10/31;12/1-1/31;4/1

-5/31

Beginning andend of

course

Beginning andend of

course

beginning andend of

course

beginning andend of

course

e nd o f 1s t s em es te r e nd o f 2n d se me st er B eg in ni ng a nd e nd o f

course

end of 1st semester e nd of 2nd semester April or May 9/1 - 10 ; 5/5 - 10

Test frequency Giventwicea year,in OctoberandMarch Three times peryear:

fall/winter/spring


fall/winter/spring

twice a year twice a year once for pre once for

post

once forpre andonce for

post

once once twice a year Once Once Once twice a year

Time between test administration and

results to users

24hoursforrawdatatodistrict;3 weeksfor

analysis

24hours forraw data to

district;24hours forsummary

data via DSS inI-Tracker at

endof testing window

24hours forraw data to

district;24hours for

summary data via DSS inI-

Trackerat endof testing

window

3-7 day 3-7 day pre test data turnover

forstudents takes

approximately 3-7days

pre test data turnoverfor

students takes

approximately 3-7days

the largerportionof test

results are immediate witha

1day lag for short answer

portions

the largerportionof test

results are immediate witha 1

day lag forshort answer

portions

3- 7da ys r esu lts a re i mme di at e w ith

exceptions forfree

response

results are immediate with

exceptions forfree response

Scores are usually

reportedby July

1 week


Association)

NWEA (NorthWest

EvaluationAssociation)

SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard SunGuard Teacher Teacher DOE

SunGuard

Teacher Teacher College Board DOE

SunGuardContract expiration date 4/1/2015 9/30/2016 9/30/2016 State determined n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a State determined n/a n/a n/a State determined

Entity that holds contract District District District State State State State n/a n/a State n/a n/a n/a State

Name of School: Delmar Middle School & Delmar High School - Group Completing Form:HighSchool SocialStudies



11/23

Achieve Assessment HS School Social StudiesAnnual c ost

(totaland per student)

$38,000total,$19.00per student(grades5-8) $13.50perstudent forfull

Math& ELA access (grades 5-

12)at 1200students

$13.50perstudent forfull

Math& ELA access (grades

5- 12)at 1200students

C op ie r a nd P a pe r c os ts C op ie r a nd P a pe r c os ts C op ie r a nd P ap er c os ts C op ie r a nd P a pe r c os ts C op ie r a nd P ap er c os ts C op ie r a nd P ap er c os ts C op ie r a nd P ap er c os ts C op ie r a nd P a pe r c os ts C op ie r a nd P ap er c os ts $ 91 p er s t ud en t ( pa id

by student)

CopierandPapercosts

Funding source(s) Local funds Grant Funds Grant Funds NA NA District State District District n/a n/a

Other Comments: time consuming andnot

very useful

Time consuming andnot

very usefull

The test appears tobe

flawedin many ways,

including a focus on

outdatedstandards that

revolve around

EconomicSystems and

transistioning command

economies tomarket

economies despite the

lack ofrelavent content

inthe modernday #12

HAS ANINCORRECT

ANSWERAND WAS

REPORTED TOTHE

STATEBUT WAS NOT

CHANGED THEFOLLOWING YEAR

DESPITETHE STATE

OFFICEBEING NOTIFIED

BYMYDISTRICT

CURRICULUM DIRECTOR

I preferthis methodas it

resembles the assessments

we complete throughout the

yearand assessment

methods we have practiced

students care muchmore

about anexam that affects

theirgrade; the turnaround

time forgrades is much

faster.

I preferthis methodas it

resembles the assessments

we complete throughout the

yearand assessment methods

we have practicedstudents

care muchmore about an

exam that affects theirgrade;

the turnaroundtime for

grades is muchfaster.

The test is not an

accurate measure of

what my students learn.

They are not investedin

the assessment as it

does not affect them.

this assessment is a more

fairrecord ofwhat my

students have learned

withinthe year. Results

are muchquicker andmore

understandable for

students.

this assessment is a more

fairrecord ofwhat my

students have learnedwithin

the year. Results are much

quickerand more

understandable forstudents.

Students whoperform

wellonthis

assessment canearn

college credit at most

accreditedcolleges.


12/23

Achieve Assessment World Language Dept.

ELA Math World Languages Spanish World Languages Spanish Midterm/Final

Name of assessment (Example) PLACEELA NWEA MAP NWEA MAP Span II LEVEL -Pre Test Span II LEVEL -Post TestEntity requiring assessment


District District District State State District

Grade(s) tested 5-8 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 5 - 12 Grades 10-12 Grades 10-12 Grades 9-12Course(s) or subjects tested ELA ELA & Math ELA & Math World Languages Spanish World Languages Spanish World Language/SpanishWhich students are eligible or required to take

assessment?

All students in these grades who are also

required to take regular state assessment

All All All All All

Type of assessment summative; interim/bench-

mark; formative; diagnostic

Benchmark B enchma rk; Inter im B enchma rk; D ia gnostic B enchma rk; Inter im B enchma rk; D ia gnostic B enchma rk/summa tive/Forma tive B enchma rk/summa tive/Forma tive Dia gnostic



5 years Purchase Order: 2011 Purchase Order: 2011 3 years 3 years n/a


aligned? (source of alignment verification)

Common Core State Standards

(Independent review by Dr. Anne Jones

using Student Achievement Partners

Assessment Eval. Tool)

Common Core Common Core World Languages GLE/Common Core World Languages GLE/Common Core World Language

Intended purpose(s) of the assessment Measure student knowledge of ELA

standards in reading comprehension





Measure Student Knowledge of Spanish Standards.

DPAS II

Measure Student Knowledge of Spanish

Standards.

DPAS II

Assess Student Learning

Intended use(s)1 of the assessment Predict ELAperformance on state

assessment and inform instructional practice

R TI Se rv ic es ; C ou rs e P la ce me nt R TI Se rv ic es ; C ou rs e P la ce me nt D et er mi ne st ud en t k no wl ed ge at th e b eg in ni ng an d t he

end.

DPAS II

Determine student knowledge at the

beginning and the end.

DPAS II

See Student Learning

Users of the assessment District assessment staff and teachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators & Teachers Administrators and Teachers Administrators and Teachers TeacherDo users of the assessment use it for its

intended use(s)?

Yes (district)

No(educators)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

To what degree do users of the assessm ent

find it useful or not useful?

1 not useful


4 very useful

Explain why.


performance on state assessment, but that

the results are not useful


Educators report MAP as useful for instructional

placement decisions



Measure B Useful

Measure C Very Useful

Measure B Useful

Measure C Very Useful

3

Type of administration Paper booklet/scantron Computer-based Computer-based Paper booklet/Scantron Paper booklet/Scantron Paper/Pencil/Computer

Item type(s) Selected response Hot Spot; Drag/Drop; Click and Pop; Graphing

Calculator TI-84; Common Stimulus; Keyboard

Entry; Drop Down; Turn & Slide; Multiple



Stimulus; Keyboard Entry; Drop Down; Turn

& Slide; Multiple

Reading: Multiple choice

Presentational Wrtiting: Essay

Wrtiting Task for conversation

Presentational Speaking

Multiple Choice/Short Answer

Acco mmod ations Braille edition of assessment Available; not used to obtain raw student

performance data

Available; not used to obtain raw student

performance data

Available as stayed on individual students IEP Available as stayed on individual students

IEP

504/IEP

Test Preparation Time (for teacher proctors)

beyond student test administration time

(including security training, tech set-up,

printing, scanning bubble sheets, etc.)

90 min 90 min Pre test: 4 hrs Post test:

4 hrs

Pre test: 2 hrs

Post test: 2 hrs

2 hours

Test administration time (for students) 150 minutes (includes 15 minutes of

instructions read aloud by teacher)

60-90 min 60-90 min Measure B Pre/Post test: 1 hour 30 minutes minutes Measure C Pre/Post: 2 hour 90 - 120 minutes

Testing window 10/110/15 and 3/13/15 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 9/1 - 10/31; 12/1 - 1/31; 4/1 - 5/31 Pre Test: September 1st to October 1st Post Test: Apri l

15 to May 15

Pre Test: September 1st to October 1st Post

Test: April 15 to May 15

winter/spring

Documents

Delmar Delaware Achieve Assessment Inventory - All Subjects