DeKalb County Schools Resolution on Cell Towers 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 DeKalb County Schools Resolution on Cell Towers 2013

    1/3

    MOTIONS / RESOLUTIONS PRESENTED TO

    THE DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR

    CONSIDERATION

    SUBJECT: Wireless Telecommunications Installations

    DATE NOTICED: Feb. 11, 2013

    PRESENTED FOR ACTION: Feb. 11, 2013

    PRESENTED BY: Ms. Cheryl Miller, Get the Cell Out - Atlanta Chapter and Ms. Viola Davis, Unhappy

    Taxpayer and Voter

    MOVED / SECONDED BY: _______________________________

    MOTION:__________________ RESOLUTION: _______________

    Whereas, the health and safety of our students and employees are fundamental concerns of the DeKalb

    County School System;

    Whereas, the financial responsibility of our school system falls upon the DeKalb County School Board inits governance responsibility;

    Whereas, there continues to be considerable debate and uncertainty within the scientific community as to

    the potential health effects to individuals, especially children, from exposure to extremely low

    frequency electromagnetic and radio-frequency radiation;

    Whereas, on May 31, 2011, the World Health Organization changed the classification of electromagnetic

    fields to category 2b, possible human carcinogen, based on the study conducted by the InternationalAgency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

    Whereas, the citizens of DeKalb County have united across political, geographic, racial and otherboundaries to work together in order to lobby their state government in an effort to ban cell phone towers

    from public school grounds;

    Whereas, the DeKalb County Commissioners penned a joint letter to DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis,

    dated March 21, 2012, to jointly oppose any alternative methods for cell tower zoning that would not

    comply with county zoning or permitting ordinances already in place;

    Whereas, the citizens of DeKalb County were successful in having their state government place a non-

    binding, advisory referendum on the DeKalb County ballot on July 31, 2012 that asked every voter if they

    approved of the placement or operation of wireless telecommunications towers on public school grounds

    at any elementary, middle, high or charter school in the county, and the voters returned an answer of No

    by a 62% majority, totaling more than 75,000 registered votes.

    Whereas, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) reported in its December 2012 report

    that our school system must change in order to save its accreditation. Among these changes were notedprimarily under the action items that #1) the focus must be serving the needs of the children and #2) the

    board must ensure that all actions and decisions of the DeKalb County Board of Education are reflective of

    the collective Board and consistent with approved policies and procedures and all applicable laws,

    regulations and standards, rather than individual board members acting independently and undermining the

    authority of the Superintendent to lead and manage day-to-day operations;

    Whereas, cell towers operating on public school grounds do not serve an educational purpose in DeKalb

    Wireless Telecommunications Installations, page 1 of 2

  • 7/29/2019 DeKalb County Schools Resolution on Cell Towers 2013

    2/3

    County and are not necessary for moving forward toward any stated technology plans in our schools;

    Whereas, cell towers place an undue financial burden upon the communities in which they would be

    placed, further eroding a tax base already in peril and alienating many taxpayers from further support of the

    district. Whereas, the Appraisal Institute, the largest global association for appraisers with more than 91chapters worldwide, has educated its members on the potential impact of cell towers on residential property

    as being anywhere from 2 - 20% decline, with the larger decline in value being realized by properties closerto the tower itself;

    Whereas, The full Parliament of the European Union has raised concerns about the exposure of children

    and young people to electromagnetic fields and continuing uncertainties about possible health risks; and

    therefore, adopted on April 2, 2009 a resolution encouraging 1) the establishment of setback criteria for

    wireless antennas, mobile phone masts and other electromagnetic emitting devices to be set within aspecific distance from schools and health institutions, 2) stricter regulations and protections for residents

    and consumers and 3) more reliable information be made available about the effects of exposure to

    electromagnetic fields to citizens in an effort to prevent a "proliferation of poorly positioned masts and

    transmitters.

    Be it enactedThat the DeKalb County School System shall not, now or in the future, consider or approve any proposals

    from telecommunication providers, tower companies, their subsidiaries or the like for the lease or sale of

    public school grounds for the purpose of construction, placement or operation of wireless or other

    telecommunications structures until such a time that these structures have been proven to the satisfaction of

    the World Health Organization, or similar authority of scientists and researchers known to the generalpublic, to be safe for operation within close proximity to homes and schools.

    Be it agreed to upon consent this 11th day of February, 2013.

    Wireless Telecommunications Installations, page 2 of 2

  • 7/29/2019 DeKalb County Schools Resolution on Cell Towers 2013

    3/3

    At this time, the citizens of DeKalb County, GA, respectfully ask

    Interim Superintendent Thurmond to please consider offering this

    resolution to the members of the DeKalb County Board of Education as

    a part of tonights consent agenda.

    Thank you.

    Sincerely,

    Cheryl L. Miller

    Get the Cell Out - ATL

    Paul F. Miller

    Get the Cell Out - ATL

    Viola Davis

    Unhappy Taxpayer and Voter

    Ruby Davis

    Unhappy Taxpayer and Voter

    Wireless Telecommunications Installations, page 3 of 2