34
Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount Sinai Medical Center

Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality

Is biopsy: helpful or harmful?

Michael J. Goldstein MD

Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation

RMTI/Mount Sinai Medical Center

Page 2: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft

Quality

• Donor demographics and history• Donor renal function• Medical management of the donor• Renal anatomy• Renal histology• Machine perfusion characteristics

Page 3: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment - KDRI

Page 4: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 5: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

• Sixteen clinical trials• involving 8,122 kidney transplants • 6 were prospective studies.

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment - Biopsy

Page 6: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

CONCLUSIONS

• Early graft outcome which may affect long-term outcomes, such as DGF and ATN, is associated more with abnormal IB histology.

• The relative impact of GS, IF, and arteriolar hyalinosis present in IB on long- term graft outcome remains limited to the extent that the prognostic information obtained from IB can be modified by other donor and recipient factors. Post-transplant biopsies are usually required to enhance the use of IB to predict the long-term outcomes. As such, no accurate single consistent proxy has so far been identified in the IB to accurately predict long-term graft outcome.

Page 7: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment - Biopsy

Page 8: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 9: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 10: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment - Biopsy

Page 11: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 12: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 13: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Sharing the Biopsy Results

Page 14: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Wedge biopsy technique

Page 15: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Core-Needle biopsy technique

Page 16: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Transplant Proc. 2010 Sep;42(7):2493-7.

Page 17: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Transplant Proc. 2010 Sep;42(7):2493-7.

Page 18: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 19: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 20: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Imported or “undesirable” kidney experience

• July 2005 to June 2006• 107 patients transplanted with 117

imported kidneys

Page 21: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Undesirable Donor Risk Factors

ECDTerm Creat >1.5Arterial plaqueBiopsy GS >10%Pump flowHigh risk behaviorAge>65SerologyParenchymal injury/Mult vesselsInfection

%

Page 22: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies to Transplant More Kidneys

• Broaden acceptance criteria for GS

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Creatinine Clearance for Control (N=88) vs Allografts with GS>10% (N=24)

cc/m

in

1M 3M 6M 1Y

Con GS Con GS Con GS Con GS

Page 23: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Biopsy Failures

• Differences in techniques• Frozen section artifacts• Experience and training of pathologist• Lack of standardization of reports

Page 24: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

46yo man creat 1.4-2.0, CVA, no PMH

Page 25: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Machine Measured Renal Resistance

Page 26: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment – Renal Resistance and Biopsy

Page 27: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Predicted Probability Plots

The ordinal regression demonstrates significance when scarring is 25-50% (p=0.02), no significance between MMRR and vascular narrowing, as well with glomerulosclerosis

P=0.62 P=0.02.1.2

.3.4

.5P

redi

cte

d P

rob

abili

ties

<10% 11-25% 26-50%Scarring

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.3

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 5 hours v. Scarring %

P=0.46 P=0.01

.1.2

.3.4

.5P

redi

cte

d P

rob

abili

ties

<10% 11-25% 26-50%Scarring %

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.3

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 3 hours v Scarring %

P=0.15 P=0.66.1.2

.3.4

.5P

redi

cte

d P

rob

abili

ties

<10% 11-25% 26-50%Vasc. Narrowing %

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.3

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 5 hours v Vasc. Narr. %

P=0.29 P=0.51

.1.2

.3.4

.5P

redi

cte

d P

rob

abili

ties

<10% 11-25% 26-50%Vasc. Narrowing %

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.2

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 3 hours v. Vasc. Narr. %

P=0.40.1.2

.3.4

.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Glomeruli Obsolete%

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.3

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 3 hours v. Glom. %

P=0.06.1.2

.3.4

.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Glomeruli Obsolete%

resistance <0.2 resistance 0.2-0.3resistance >0.3

Predicted Probabilities: Resistance at 5 hours v. Glom. %

Glomerulosclerosis Vascular NarrowingTubulointerstitial Scarring

Page 28: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Strategies for Improving Organ Assessment – Renal Resistance and Biopsy

Page 29: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 30: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 31: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount
Page 32: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Policy Creation

Page 33: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Policy Creation

Page 34: Defining Preimplantation Renal Allograft Quality Is biopsy: helpful or harmful? Michael J. Goldstein MD Director, Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation RMTI/Mount

Conclusions• Donor history, function, biopsy, and renal

resistance are all interrelated• All 4 are useful tools in defining donor renal

allograft quality prior to transplantation• The biopsy technique, processing, and the

histologic report can lead to errors in reporting and interpretation of data.

• We should strive to have consistency in reporting by experienced renal pathologists

• Biopsy alone, with other favorable predictors, should be questioned before an organ is declined