1

ALEKHINE'S DEFENSE

/(+47,'0 $#$#$#$# ?@?@?@?@ @?@?@?@? ?@?@?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"!"!"!" .%*16)&-…

ALEKHINE'S DEFENSE.

1. e4 ¥f6 This bold move was

introduced by Alekhine in 1921, he also

has elaborated the main ideas of this

opening. Black provokes his opponent

to occupy the center with the pawns and

then attacks it, combining piece

pressure with pawn thrusts. Further we

will deal with the three main lines in the

Alekhine Defense: 2. e5 ¥d5 3. d4 d6

4. c4

[4. ¥f3 2 Modern Variation]

4... ¥b6 5. f4 2 Four Pawns Attack

[5. exd6 2 Exchange Variation]

Four pawns attack

/(+47,?0 $#$?$#$# ?(?$?@?@ @?@?"?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"?@?"!" .%*16)&-…

Four Pawns Attack.

5. f4 One of the most aggressive

objections to the Alekhine Defense.

White occupies the center with his

pawns, seizes space and prepares the

d42d5 breakthrough. However, the

impetuous white pawn advance has

exposed White's rear and left him behind

in development. Black's counterplay

involves undermining the enemy center

by means of c72c5 and even f72f6. 5...

dxe5 6. fxe5 c5!? This immediate thrust

leads to hair2raising complications. 7.

d5 e6 8. ¥c3 exd5 9. cxd5 c4!

[9... £h4+ 10. g3 £d4 11. ¤f4 g5 12.

¤xg5 £xe5+ 13. £e2 £xe2+ 14.

¥gxe2 ¤g4 15. ¤g2 ¤g7 16. h3!

¤xe2 17. ¢xe2 ¥c4 18. ¢d3 ¥e5+

19. ¢c2²-ƒ Kamyshov 2 Aronin,

USSR 1945]

10. ¥f3 ¤g4 11. £d4 ¤xf3 12. gxf3

¤b4 13. ¤xc4 O2O 14. ¦g1! White's

center is vulnerable, but he desperately

fights for the initiative exploiting lack of

defenders near the enemy king shelter.

14... g6!

[14... £c7? 15. e6! fxe6 16. ¤h6

£xc4 17. ¦xg7+ ¢h8 18. ¦g8+! 1:0

Ljubojevic 2 Honfi, Cacak 1970]

15. ¤g5 £c7 16. ¤b3 ¤c5 17. £f4

¤xg1 18. d6! Having sacrificed a rook,

White launched a very strong attack on

the black king.

[18. ¢e2? £c5! 19. ¦xg1 £xg1 20.

¤f6 £g2+ 21. ¢e3 £xb2 22. ¢d3

¥8d7 23. ¥e4 ¦ac8 24. £h6 ¥xe5+

25. ¢e3 ¦c3+ 0:1 Gheorghiu 2

2

Ljubojevic, Manila 1973]

18... £c8 19. ¢e2?!

[19. O2O2O! ¤c5 20. e6 fxe6 21. £e5

¥d5 22. d7!±‚]

19... ¤c5?!

[19... £c5! 20. e6 ¥8d7!›]

20. ¥e4 ¥8d7 21. ¦c1 £c6 22. ¦xc5!

¥xc5 23. ¥f6+ ¢h8 24. £h4 £b5+ 25.

¢e3! h5 26. ¥xh5 £xb3+™ 27. axb3

¥d5+ 28. ¢d4 ¥e6+ 29. ¢xd5 ¥xg5

30. ¥f6+ ¢g7 31. £xg5Q...1:0

1:0,Bronstein 2 Ljubojevic, Petropolis

1973

Gruenfeld Y. - Ljubojevic L. (Riga (Latvia),1979)

/(?@?07@‹ $#4?@#@# ?(?"?@#@ @?@?"?*? ?@?@?2?@ @)&?@!@? !"?@?@?" .?@?6?,?

It may seem strange, but this is one of

the key positions in the Four Pawns

Attack. So far Black manages to

maintain equality giving back his extra

material in order to hold back the white

attack. 18... £c5! 19. ¥e4 £d4 20.

¦d1 £xb2 21. e6

[Later on White improved with 21.

¥f6+! ¢h8 22. ¦d2 £a1+! (22...

£b1+? 23. ¢e2 ¥8d7 24. £h4 h5

25. ¥xh5 gxh5 26. ¤f6+ ¥xf6 27.

£xf6+ ¢h7 (27... ¢g8 28. £g5+

¢h8 29. ¤c2!Q) 28. ¤c2+ £xc2

29. ¦xc2Q) 23. ¢e2 ¥c6 24. £h4

h5 25. ¥xh5 ¥d4+ 26. ¦xd4 £xd4

27. ¤f6+ ¢g8 28. ¥f4 £f2+! 29.

£xf2 ¤xf2 30. ¥xg6! ¦fe8 31.

¢xf2›]

21... ¥8d7! 22. e7 £xh2! 23. exf8=£+

¦xf8 24. £xh2 ¤xh2 25. ¥f6+ ¢g7 26.

¥xd7 ¥xd7 The dust has settled, and

Black retains an extra pawn in the

endgame. 27. ¤e7 ¦b8 28. ¢f2 ¤e5

29. ¦c1 ¥c5 30. ¦d1 ¤f6 31. ¤xf6+

¢xf6 32. ¤c4 ¦d8 33. ¢g3 a6 34. ¤f1

¢e5 35. f4+ ¢e6 36. ¤c4+ ¢f6 37. ¢f3

b5 0:1,Gruenfeld 2 Ljubojevic, Riga 1979

Znosko-Borovsky E. - Alekhin A. (Paris

(France),1925)

/(+47,?0‹ $#$?$#$# ?(?@?@?@ @?@?"?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"?@?@!" .%*16)&-

6... ¥c6 A solid continuation. Black

develop his pieces, delaying attack on

the white center for a while. 7. ¤e3

[7. ¥f3?! ¤g4!]

7... ¤f5 8. ¥f3 e6 9. ¥c3 ¥b4!? With

the idea of undermining the opponent's

center by c72c5. 10. ¦c1 c5! 11. a3?!

[11. ¤g5?! ¤e7 12. ¤xe7 ¢xe7! 13.

a3 cxd4 14. ¥xd4 ¥d3+! 15. ¤xd3

£xd4µ Marjanovic 2 G.Agzamov,

3

Rakovica 1982]

11... cxd4!

[11... ¥c6 12. d5±]

12. ¤g5

[12. axb4 dxe3µ]

12... dxc3! 13. ¤xd8 ¦xd8©‚ 14.

£b3 cxb2 15. £xb2 ¥a4 16. £a1 ¥c2+

[16... ¥d3+!? 17. ¤xd3 ¦xd3 18. c5!

(18. O2O? ¦xa3°) 18... ¤xc5 19.

¦xc5 ¥xc5µ ]

17. ¦xc2 ¤xc2 18. ¥d4 ¤g6 19. c5!

¥xc5

[19... ¤xc5 20. ¤b5+ ¢e7 21. ¥b3

¤b6! 22. ¤xa4 ¦d3 23. ¥c1! ¦e3+

24. ¥e2 ¤h5 25. ¤d1±]

20. ¤b5+ ¥d7 21. £c3 a6?!

[21... ¤e7! 22. £c7 a6 23. ¤a4 ¤e4

24. O2O b5 25. ¤c2 ¤c5µ]

22. ¤xd7+ ¦xd7 23. £c8+ ¦d8 24.

£xb7 ¦xd4 25. £c6+ ¦d7 26. O2O

¤d3

[26... ¢e7 27. £c5+=]

27. ¦xf7! ¤c5+ 28. ¢h1 ¤b5!

[28... ¤e7 29. £xe6 ¤g6 30. ¦f1²]

29. £xe6+ ¦e7

[29... ¤e7? 30. ¦xe7+]

30. ¦xe7+ ¤xe7 31. £c8+ ¤d8 32.

£e6+ ¤e7

[32... ¢f8 33. a4 ¤xa4 34. £f5+

¢e7? 35. £g4 ¦f8 36. £b4+±]

33. £c8+ ¤d8 34. £e6+

½:½,Znosko2Borovsky 2 Alekhin, Paris

1925

Petrov V. - Fine R. (Kemeri (Latvia),1937)

/@?47,?0 $#@?@#$# ?(?@#@?@ @?$?"+@? ?(!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@?@!" @?.16)@-…

11. ¤e2! The strongest continuation.

Before White has completed his

development, he should avoid any

clashes in the center. 11... ¤e7!

[11... cxd4?! 12. ¥xd4 ¥c6 13. O2O

¥d7 14. ¥xf5 exf5 15. ¦xf5 g6 16.

¦xf7! ¢xf7 17. e6+! ¢xe6 18. £d5+

¢e7 19. ¦f1 ¥f6 20. ¤c5+ ¢e8 21.

£e6+ ¤e7 22. ¦xf6±‚

Mikhalchishin 2 G.Agzamov, USSR

(ch) Frunze 1981]

12. O2O!

[12. a3 cxd4 13. ¥xd4 ¥c6 14. ¥xf5

exf5 15. £c2 ¤g5! 16. ¦d1 ¤xe3!

(this positional queen sacrifice is a

typical method in this line) 17. ¦xd8+

¦xd8 18. £xf5 O2O©ƒ]

12... O2O 13. a3! Having completed his

development, White is going ahead.

13... cxd4!

[13... ¥a6 14. d5!±]

14. ¥xd4 ¥c6 15. ¥xf5 exf5 16. ¦xf5

g6 17. ¦f1 ¤g5!

[17... ¥xe5 18. £xd8 ¦axd8 19.

¤xb6! axb6 20. ¥d5²ƒ]

18. ¤c5! ¦e8

[18... ¤xc1?! 19. £xc1 ¦e8 20. £f4

¥xe5 21. ¥e4 ¥bd7 22. ¤d4©‚]

19. £xd8 ¦axd8 20. ¦cd1 ¦d2

4

[20... ¥xe5!? 21. ¥e4 ¦xd1 22.

¦xd1 (22. ¤xd1 ¤e7 23. b3 ¤xc5+

24. ¥xc5 ¦e7 25. ¤c2 f5= Keres 2

Sajtar, Prague 1943) 22... ¤e7 23.

¤xe7 ¦xe7 24. c5²]

21. ¦xd2 ¤xd2 22. ¤d6 ¤xc3 23. bxc3

¥xe5› 24. c5 ¥d5

[24... ¥bc4 25. ¦b1!]

25. ¦c1 ¦e6 26. ¤f1ƒ- a6? 27. ¦b1

b5 28. cxb6!! ¦xd6 29. b7 ¥c6

[29... ¥d7 30. ¦d1 … c4]

30. c4! ¥e3 31. ¦b6! ¦d1 32. ¢f2

¦xf1+ 33. ¢xe3 ¥b8 34. ¦d6?

[34. ¢e2! ¦f5 35. ¦d6 ¦e5+ 36.

¢d3 ¦e8 37. c5Q]

34... ¦e1+ 35. ¢d4 ¢f8?

[35... ¢g7! 36. c5 ¦b1 37. c6 ¥xc6+

38. ¦xc6 ¦xb7 39. ¢c3 ¦a7=]

36. ¦d8+ ¦e8 37. ¦c8! ¢e7 38. ¢d5

¦d8+ 39. ¦xd8 ¢xd8 40. ¢d6!

1:0,Petrov 2 Fine, Kemeri 1937

Naegeli O. - Euwe M. (Bern (Switzerland),1932)

/@?47,?0‹ $#$?@#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@?"+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@?@!" .?@16)@-

9... £d7 Proposed by Tartakower.

Black intends to castle queenside, firing

in the weakened d42pawn. 10. ¤e2

[10. d5?! exd5 11. cxd5 ¥b4! 12.

¥d4 ¥6xd5 13. ¥xd5 ¥xd5! 14.

¥xf5 ¤b4+ 15. ¢e2 (15. ¤d2 £xf5

16. £a4+ c6 17. ¤xb4 £e4+) 15...

O2O2O 16. ¥d6+ ¤xd6 17. £xd5

£f5©‚ Tomic 2 Gipslis, Dortmund

1978]

10... O2O2O 11. £d2 f6! Hitting the

white pawn chain. 12. exf6 gxf6 13.

O2O ¦g8 14. ¦fd1 £g7! 15. ¤f1 ¥e5!

Crushing the d42point by tactical means.

16. ¥xe5 fxe5 17. £f2 ¤g4 18. ¦d2

exd4 19. ¤xd4 ¦xd4! 20. ¦xd4 ¤c5 21.

¦d8+ ¦xd8 22. £xc5 ¦d2!µ 23. ¥e4

¦xb2 24. ¥d6+ ¢d7 25. ¥b5 ¢c8 26.

¦e1

[26. ¥d6+ ¢b8µ]

26... ¢b8 27. ¦e5 ¤f5 28. £d4 ¦d2!

29. £e3 ¦d1 30. ¢f2 £f6 31. ¤e2

¤e4+! 0:1,Naegeli 2 Euwe, Bern 1932

Yudovich - Beletsky (Smolensk,1929)

?@70?,?0 $#$3@#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@?"+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@)@!" .?@16?@-…

11. O2O A drawback of Tartakower's

plan is the insecure black king's position

on the queenside. 11... f6 12. d5! The

d42d5 advance is White's main attacking

device in the Four Pawns Attack. 12...

¥xe5 13. ¥xe5 fxe5 14. ¦c1 With the

idea of c42c52c6 pawn raid, destroying

5

the black king shelter.

[14. a4!?… à52à6‚«]

14... ¤e7

[14... ¢b8 15. a4! exd5 16. a5 d4 17.

axb6 dxe3 18. ¦xf5!Q]

15. c5! ¥xd5 16. c6! £xc6 17. ¥b5

£d7 18. ¥xa7+ ¢b8 19. £b3 ¥xe3 20.

¥c6+ ¢c8 21. ¤a6!

[21. £a4? £d2!]

21... £d2 22. ¤xb7+ ¢d7 23. ¥xe5+

¢e8 24. ¤c6+ ¢f8 25. £xe6!

1:0,Yudovich 2 Beletsky, Smolensk 1929

Ligterink G. - Gipslis A. (Amsterdam

(Netherlands),1976)

?@70?,?0‹ $#$3@#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@?"+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@)@!" .?@1@-6?

11... ¤g4! A reliable move by which

Black keeps on attacking the d42square.

12. c5 ¥d5

[12... ¤xf3?! 13. cxb6 ¤xe2 14. bxa7!

¥xa7 15. £xe2±]

13. ¥xd5 £xd5 14. ¥g5

[14. b4!? £e4 15. £b3 ¥xd4 16.

¥xd4 ¤xe2 17. ¦f4! £xe5 18. ¦e1

g5! 19. ¦f2 ¤h5 20. ¦d2 ¤g7 21.

£a4 and here again, a queen sacrifice

rescues Black: 21... ¦xd4! (21...

¢b8? 22. b5 ¦d5 23. c6±‚ ¦hd8

24. ¥xe6! £xe3+ 25. ¦xe3 fxe6 26.

¦a3 a6 27. ¦xd5 ¦xd5 28. bxa6 1:0

Platonov 2 Kupreichik, Moscow 1969)

22. ¦xd4 £xe3+! 23. ¦xe3 ¤xd4©ƒ]

14... ¤xe2 15. £xe2 ¥xd4 16. ¤xd4

£xd4+ 17. ¢h1 £d2! 18. £xd2 ¦xd2

19. ¦xf7 ¤xc5 20. ¥xe6 ¤d4 21. ¥xd4

[21. ¦xc7+ ¢b8 22. ¦d7 ¤xb2³]

21... ¦xd4 22. ¦xg7

[22. ¦af1 ¦d7! 23. ¦xd7 (23. e6

¦xf7 24. ¦xf7 g6 25. ¢g1 ¦e8=)

23... ¢xd7 24. ¦f7+ ¢e6 25. ¦xc7

¦d8 26. ¢g1 ¦d7 1/2:1/2 Gipslis 2

Kengis, Yurmala 1983]

22... h5! 23. ¦c1 c6 24. ¦f1 ¦e4 25. h3

¦xe5 26. ¦ff7 ¦b5 27. b3 a5 28. ¢g1

¢b8 29. g4 hxg4 ½:½,Ligterink 2 Gipslis,

Amsterdam 1976

Bronstein D. - Rudakovsky I. (Moscow

(Russia),1945)

/@?47,?0‹ $#$?@#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@?"+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@?@!" .?@16)@-

9... ¤e7 A logical plan. Black

completes his development and then

undermines the opponent's center with

f72f6. 10. ¤e2 O2O 11. O2O f6! 12. exf6

¤xf6 13. £d2 The struggle evolves for

and against the d42point, so both sides

are concentrating their forces here.

6

13... £e7 14. ¦ad1 ¦ad8 15. £c1 ¤g6

Black should not blunder the g22g42g5

advance which may have led to a loss of

the bishop on f6!

[15... ¦d7 16. h3 ¦fd8? 17. g4! ¤g6

18. c5! ¥c8 (18... ¥d5 19. g5!Q)

19. ¤b5! h6 20. ¤f2±† Matanovic 2

Klundt, Siegen 1970]

16. ¢h1 ¦d7? 17. d5! The d42d5

break, White's cherished goal, turns out

possible due to the unhappy black king's

position on g8. 17... ¥b4

[17... ¥e5? 18. ¥xe5 ¤xe5 19.

¤g4!]

18. a3 ¥a6 19. b4 ¦fd8 20. ¤d4!±† c5

21. ¤xf6 gxf6 22. ¥h4! exd5 23. ¤g4!

cxb4 24. axb4 ¦c7 25. c5 ¥xc5 26.

bxc5 £xc5 27. ¥xg6 £xc3 28. £h6

£c6 29. ¦de1 f5 30. ¤xf5 ¦f7 31.

¥e7+ ¦xe7 32. £g5+ 1:0,Bronstein 2

Rudakovsky, Moscow 1945

Medina-Garcia A. - Smyslov V. (Hastings

(England),1970)

?@?0?07@‹ $#$?4?$# ?('@#,?@ @?@?@+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@)@!" @?2-@-6?

The position that has arisen is typical for

the Four Pawns Attack; first of all Black

should take necessary precautions

against threatening white pawn attacks:

d42d5, c42c5, and g22g42g5. 15... h6!

16. ¢h1 ¢h8! 17. h3 ¤h7! In this

complicated position with mutual

chances Black should keep vigilant

watch on the white c2 and d2pawn

moves, while White should not forget

about the eventual e62e5 threat. 18.

¦fe1

[18. ¤g1 ¦fe8 19. ¦fe1 £f7 20. c5

¥d5 21. ¤b5 ¥db4 22. a3 a6 23.

axb4 axb5 24. ¥xb5 ¥xb4 25. £c4

¥c6 26. ¤h2 ¦d7= Hecht 2 Timman,

Wijk aan Zee 1971]

18... £f7 19. b3 ¦fe8 20. ¦f1

[20. ¤g1 ¦e7! 21. ¦f1 £e8 22. £f4

e5!³]

20... £e7 21. ¦fe1= ¦d7!? 22. d5?!

[22. c5 ¥d5 23. ¥xd5 ¦xd5 24. ¤c4

¦dd8›]

22... ¥b4 23. ¥d4! exd5! 24. ¤h5

¥d3! 25. ¦xd3 ¤xd3 26. ¤f2

[26. ¤d2 ¤e4 27. ¤xe8 £xe8 28.

cxd5 ¤xg2+ 29. ¢xg2 £g6+ 30. ¢h1

¤xd4]

26... ¤xd4! 27. ¤xe8?

[27. ¦xe7 ¦dxe7 28. ¤h4 dxc4!©ƒ]

27... ¤xf2! 28. ¦xe7 ¦xe7 29. £f4

¦e1+ 30. ¢h2 ¤g1+ 31. ¢g3 ¦xe8 32.

cxd5 ¦e3+ 33. ¢g4 ¥d7 [...]

0:1,Medina2Garcia 2 Smyslov, Hastings

1970

[34. £xc7 ¥f6+ 35. ¢f4 g5#]

Kveinys A. - Panchenko A. (URS,1979)

7

/@?47@?0 $#$?,#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@?"+@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@?@!" .?@16)@-…

10. d5!? This ambitious move leads to

crazy complications. White intends to

make use of his advantage in the center,

vacating the d42square for the f32knight.

10... exd5 A risky pawn exchange

which allows the white bishop check on

b5. 11. cxd5 ¥b4 12. ¥d4! ¤d7

[12... ¤c8?! 13. ¤b5+! c6 14. dxc6

O2O 15. O2O £c7 16. cxb7 ¤xb7 17.

£g4!‚» £xe5 18. ¦ae1 ¤d6 19.

¥f5! ¤c8 20. ¥h6+ ¢h8 21. £h4!

¤c5 22. ¥xf7+! 1:0 Morozevich 2

Bratchenko, Novgorod 1997]

13. e6!

[13. ¥f3 ¤g4 14. ¤xb6 axb6 15. ¤e2

¤c5 16. a3 ¤xf3 17. ¤xf3 £h4+! 18.

g3 £d4! 19. £xd4 ¥c2+ 20. ¢d2

¥xd4= Geller 2 Vaganian, Sochi 1986]

13... fxe6 14. dxe6 ¤c6 15. £g4 ¤h4+!

16. g3! ¤xh1 17. gxh4 O2O 18.

O2O2O©ƒ £f6 19. ¤b5! £e5

[19... ¤f3? 20. ¥xf3 £xf3 21. £xf3

¦xf3 22. ¤xb6 axb6 23. e7Q]

20. ¤h6 c5 21. ¦g1 cxd4?!

[21... g6!›]

22. £xg7+!

[22. ¤xg7 ¦f1+!]

22... £xg7 23. ¤xg7 ¦f2 24. ¤xd4+

¦g2 25. ¦xh1 ¥c6 26.

¤c5¬©ƒ-(žå6) ¦e8 27. e7 ¥d7 28.

¤d6 a6 29. ¤c4+ ¢g7 30. ¦f1 ¥f6 31.

¥d5 ¥e4 32. ¤f4 ¥xe7 33. ¤e5+ ¢h6

34. ¥e3 ¦c8 35. ¦f7 ¦g1+ 36. ¢c2

¥d5 37. ¢d3 ¥xe3 38. ¤f4+ ¢g6 39.

h5+ ¢xh5 40. ¤xe3 ¦e1 41. ¦xh7+

¢g6 42. ¦xb7 ¦xe3+ 43. ¢xe3 ¦xc4

44. b3 ¦c2 45. ¢xe4 ¦xa2 46. ¦a7

¦xh2 47. ¦xa6+ ¢f7 48. ¢d5! ¢e7 49.

¢c6!Q 1:0,Kveinys 2 Panchenko, URS

1979

Kokkoris H. - Marovic D. (Greece,1970)

/@?47@?0‹ $#$?,#$# ?('@#@?@ @?@!"+@? ?@!@?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@?@!" .?@16)@-

10... ¥b4 11. ¥d4 ¤g6 Now the black

e2pawn is not exchanged, and it

withstands the enemy onslaught in the

center. 12. a3

[12. dxe6!? O2O! 13. a3 c5! 14. axb4

cxd4 15. £xd4 ¤xb4 16. exf7+ ¤xf7

17. £xd8 ¦fxd8©]

12... c5™ ! A standard counterblow.

13. ¥xe6!

[13. axb4 cxd4 14. ¤xd4 ¤xb4 15.

¤e2 O2O 16. O2O (16. d6 £h4+! 17.

¤f2 £g5 18. ¤g3 £e3 19. £d2

¥xc4!) 16... exd5 17. cxd5 ¤xc3 18.

bxc3 £xd5 19. ¤xb6 £xd1 20.

¦axd1 axb6³]

8

13... fxe6 14. axb4 cxb4 15. ¥b5?! O2O!

16. d6 ¤g5 White has won the

strategical battle in the center, having

obtained a powerful protected passed

pawn on d6, but his king is stuck on e1,

and Black's counterplay turns out to be

very dangerous. 17. ¤d4 ¤e3!! 18.

¤xe3 £h4+ 19. ¢d2 ¦xf1! 20. ¦xf1

¥xc4+ 21. ¢e2 ¤h5+ 22. ¦f3 ¤xf3+

23. ¢xf3

[23. gxf3 £xh2+ 24. ¤f2 £xe5+]

23... ¦f8+ 24. ¢e2 £g4+ 25. ¢e1

£xg2 0:1,Kokkoris 2 Marovic, Greece

1970

Kupreichik V. - Gipslis A. (Moscow (Russia),1972)

/@?47@?0 $#@?,?$# ?(?@#@+@ @?@!"?@? ?$!@?@?@ @?&?*?@? ?"?@?@!" .?@16)@-…

15. ¥a4! A rare case in the Alekhine's

Defense when an exchange of the knight

on b6 is in White's favor. The point is that

the white pawns have advanced so far

ahead that the b62knight is ready to take

part in their elimination. 15... ¥d7!?

[Later on Black found a more reliable

way: 15... O2O!? 16. ¥xb6 axb6 17.

¦xa8 £xa8 18. d6 ¤d8 19. ¤e2 b3!

20. ¦f1! £a5+ 21. £d2 £xe5 22.

¦xf8+ ¢xf8 23. ¤f4 £a5 24.

d7©žd7]

16. £d4! £a5 17. d6 ¤d8 18. c5 b5! 19.

b3! O2O! To survive, Black has to

destroy the opponent's powerful

connected passed pawns in the center;

he manages to solve this task by a

queen sacrifice.

[19... bxa4? 20. ¦xa4 £xc5 21. £xc5

¥xc5 22. ¤xc5 O2O 23. ¤c4±]

20. ¥b6 £xa1+ 21. £xa1 axb6 22. £b2

[22. £xa8? ¤h4+ 23. g3 ¦xa8 24.

gxh4 ¥xe5]

22... ¥xe5! 23. cxb6?!

[23. £xe5! ¤f6 24. £xe6+ ¢h8 25.

c6! ¤c3+ (25... ¦ae8? 26. £xe8!

¦xe8 27. ¢f2Q) 26. ¤d2 ¦a1+ 27.

¢e2 ¦a2 28. c7!]

23... ¤h4+ 24. ¢d1 ¥g4 25. ¤d4

¦ad8!©ƒ 26. g3 ¦xd6 27. gxh4 e5 28.

¤xb5 ¥e3+ 29. ¢c1 exd4 30. £d2

¦xb6 31. £xb4 ¦fb8 32. £xd4 ¦xb5

33. £xe3 ¦xb3µ‚ 34. £e6+ ¤f7 35.

£e4 ¦3b4 36. £f5 ¦4b5 37. £c2 ¦b4

38. £f5 ¦4b5 39. £c2 ¤b3 40. £c7

¦5b7 41. £c6 ¦b6 42. £c5 ¤a4 43.

¢d2 ¦d8+ 44. ¢e3 ¦e6+ 45. ¢f4

¦f8+ 46. ¢g5 ¦g6+ 47. ¢h5 ¤e8!

0:1,Kupreichik 2 Gipslis, Moscow 1972

Exchange variation

9

/(+47,?0 $#$?$#$# ?(?$?@?@ @?@?"?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"?@?"!" .%*16)&-…

Exchange Variation.

5. exd6

Variation with 5... cxd6

/(+47,?0 $#$?$#$# ?(?$?@?@ @?@?"?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"?@?"!" .%*16)&-…

Variation with 5... cxd6.

5. exd6 By this modest pawn capture

White intends to complete his

development with simple natural moves,

securing a slight advantage in space.

5... cxd6 6. ¥c3 g6 The main idea of

the Alekhine's Defense is piece pressure

on the white center, so the bishop's

fianchetto is quite in the spirit of this

opening. 7. h3!? Restriction of the

c82bishop is a common idea in similar

positions. 7... ¤g7 8. ¥f3 O2O 9. ¤e2

¥c6 10. O2O ¤f5 11. ¤e3 d5! From

this move on, Black intends to

counterattack on the light squares. 12.

c5 ¥c4! 13. ¤xc4

[13. ¤c1 b6! 14. g4 ¤c8 15. b3 bxc5!

16. bxc4 cxd4 17. ¥xd5 d3! 18. £xd3

¤xa1 19. ¤g5 ¤g7µ Janosevic 2

Hort, Skopje 1968]

13... dxc4 14. £a4 ¤d3 15. ¦fd1 £a5!

16. £xa5 ¥xa5„ 17. ¥e1

[17. b4 ¥c6 18. b5 ¥b4„]

17... ¤f5 18. d5! [x¥a5]

[18. ¦ac1 ¥c6! 19. g4 ¤d7 20. d5

¥b4 21. b3 ¥xa2!? 22. ¥xa2 cxb3

23. ¥c3 ¦fc8 24. ¤d4 ¤xd4 25.

¦xd4 ¦xc5 26. ¦b4 ¦ac8©

Dvoretzky 2 Bagirov, USSR (ch) Tbilisi

1973]

18... h5 19. f3 ¦ac8 20. ¦ac1 ¦fd8 21.

g4 hxg4 22. hxg4 ¤d7 23. ¢f2 f5!

[23... ¤e8? 24. f4 e6 25. ¥f3 exd5

26. ¥xd5± Dvoretzky 2 Martz, Wijk

aan Zee 1975]

24. g5 e6! Black keeps on fighting for

possession of the light squares. 25.

c6!? bxc6 26. dxe6 ¤xe6 27. ¤xa7

¦xd1 28. ¦xd1 c5!³- 29. ¥c2 ¥b7

30. ¤b6 ¦c6 31. ¤d8 ¢f7 32. ¤f6

¤xf6 33. gxf6 ¢xf6 34. ¥e3 g5µ

½:½,Pritchett 2 Schmidt, Pula 1975

Vasiukov E. - Orev P. (Kislovodsk (Russia),1968)

10

/@+4?07@ $#@?$#,# ?('$?@#@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?*%@? !"?@)"!" .%@1@-6?…

10. ¥bd2!? A tricky set2up introduced

to practice by Bronstein. The knight on

d2 controls the important c42square;

besides, in the case of ¤ñ82g4xf3 White

is ready to recapture with the knight.

10... ¤g4 11. d5! ¥e5 12. ¥xe5 ¤xe2

13. £xe2 ¤xe5 14. ¥f3 ¤f6 15. ¦ac1

White exerts pressure in the center and

has a clear advantage. 15... a5 16.

¥d4 ¥d7 17. ¦fd1 ¥c5 18. ¥b5 £d7

19. ¤d4! ¦fe8 20. £e3 ¦ac8 21. ¤xf6

exf6 22. £f4±†(xd6) ¥e4 23. h3 g5 24.

£g4 f5 25. £h5 £e7 26. £h6 ¦cd8 27.

¦e1 £f8 28. £h5 £g7 29. ¦c2 ¦e5

30. ¦ee2 ¦de8 31. ¢f1 h6 32. ¥d4!

¢h7 33. £f3 £g6 34. g4! fxg4 35. hxg4

¥f6 36. ¥f5 h5 37. ¥xd6 ¥xg4 38.

£xf7+ £xf7 39. ¥xf7 ¥h2+ 40. ¢e1

¥f3+ 41. ¢d1 ¦xe2 42. ¦xe2 ¦f8 43.

¦e7 ¢g6 44. ¢e2 g4 45. ¥e5+ ¥xe5

46. ¦xe5 h4 47. ¦e4 ¢g5 48. ¦e5+

¢g6 49. ¦e6+ ¢g5 50. d6 h3 51. d7 h2

52. ¦e8 h1=£ 53. d8=£+ ¢g6 54.

¦xf8 £e4+ 55. ¢d2 1:0,Vasiukov 2

Orev, Kislovodsk 1968

Nicevski R. - Jansa V. (Athens (Greece),1969)

/@+4?07@‹ $#@?$#,# ?('$?@#@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?*%@? !"?&)"!" .?@1@-6?

10... d5! This standard method works

here too, even despite the fact that the

c42square is inaccessible for the black

knight. 11. c5 ¥d7 12. £b3

[12. ¥b3 e5! 13. dxe5 ¥dxe5=]

12... e5! This counterblow is possible

because, in comparison with the line

with ¥c3, the white knight on d2 lacks

control over the center. 13. dxe5

[13. £xd5 exd4 14. ¥xd4 ¥xd4 15.

¤xd4 ¥xc5!=]

13... ¥dxe5 14. ¥xe5 ¥xe5 15. ¦fd1

¥g4 16. ¤xg4 ¤xg4 17. f3 ¤e6„” 18.

£xb7 ¦b8 19. £xa7 ¦xb2©ƒ- 20.

¥b3?

[20. c6›]

20... £h4!‚» 21. £c7

[21. c6 ¤e5!]

21... ¤h6! 22. ¤d4

[22. ¤xh6? £f2+°]

22... ¤f4 23. £xf4 ¦xg2+! 24. ¢xg2

¤h3+ 25. ¢g1 £xf4 26. ¦d2 ¦e8 27.

c6 £xf3 28. c7 ¦e4 0:1,Nicevski 2

Jansa, Athens 1969

Toran A. - Korchnoi V. (Uppsala (Sweden),1956)

11

/@+4?07@‹ $#@?$#,# ?('$?@#@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@? !"?@)"!" .?@1@-6?

If White develops his knight to an active

position on c3 and does not waste a

tempo for the preventative h22h3 move,

then Black obtains counterplay by the

standard d62d5 advance in combination

with the ¤c82g4 lunge. 10... ¤g4

Intending to intensify pressure on the

d42pawn by an exchange on f3. 11. b3

d5! 12. c5 ¥c8 13. h3?! Forcing Black

to carry out a favorable for him

exchange. 13... ¤xf3 14. ¤xf3 e6

Black prepares a typical maneuver

¥c82e72f5, attacking the d42pawn. 15.

b4

[15. £d2 ¥8e7 16. ¥b5 ¥f5 17.

¤g4 a6 18. ¤xf5 axb5 19. ¤c2 ¦a3³

Browne 2 Fischer, Rovinj/Zagreb

1970]

15... a6 16. b5 axb5 17. ¥xb5 ¥8e7! 18.

¤g5 £a5 19. ¤xe7 ¥xe7 20. £d3

¥c6³ (xd4) 21. a4 b6! 22. cxb6 £xb6

23. ¦fd1 ¦a5 24. £c3 ¦fa8 25. ¦ac1

¥xd4! 26. ¦xd4 ¦xb5! 27. axb5 ¤xd4µ

28. £d2 ¦d8 29. ¤d1 e5 30. £e2 ¦b8

31. ¦b1 £c5 32. g3 ¦b6 33. ¢g2 ¢g7

34. ¦b3 e4 35. £a2 £d6 36. £d2 ¤c5

37. ¤c2 £e5 38. £e2 ¦f6 0:1,Toran 2

Korchnoi, Uppsala 1956

Klovans J. - Bagirov V. (Alma-Ata

(Kazakhstan),1968)

/@'4?07@ $#@?$#,# ?@'@?@#@ @?"#@?@? ?@?"?@+@ @!&?*%@? !@?@)"!" .?@1@-6?…

13. b4! The pawn structure arising in

this opening dictates the plans of both

sides; White's plan involves a queenside

pawn majority advance. 13... a6! An

important move. Black intends to use the

a2file in the future. 14. ¦b1!

[14. a4? ¥xb4;

14. £d2 e6! 15. ¦fd1 ¥8e7! 16. ¥e1

¤xe2 17. ¥xe2 ¥f5 18. ¥f3 h6 19.

a4 ¦e8 20. b5 ¥a5! 21. £c3

¥c4³ƒ” Westerinen 2 Hort, Leningrad

1967]

14... e6 15. a4 ¥8e7 16. b5 axb5 17.

axb5 ¤xf3! Here too, this standard

exchange works well.

[17... ¥a5 18. ¥e5! ¤xe2 19. £xe2

¥f5 20. f4 f6 21. ¥f3 ¥c4 22. ¤f2

¦e8 23. ¦bc1²ƒ« Oll 2 Wach, Manila

(ol) 1992]

18. ¤xf3 ¥a5 The knight rushes to c4.

19. ¤e2 ¥f5 20. £d2 h6

[20... ¥c4 21. ¤xc4 dxc4 22. £e2

¤xd4 23. ¦fd1 e5 24. ¤xd4 ¥xd4

25. £xc4²ƒž«]

21. ¦fd1 ¦e8 22. b6 [...] ½:½,Klovans 2

Bagirov, Alma2Ata 1968

12

[22... e5! (a typical for this pawn

structure breakthrough) 23. ¥b5

¥xd4! (23... exd4 24. ¤f4 ¥c4 25.

£c2 ¥a3 26. ¥xa3 ¦xa3 27. ¤c7

£g5 28. ¤b5±ƒ«) 24. ¤xd4 (24. ¥c7

¥ac6©) 24... exd4 25. ¥c7 ¥c4! 26.

¤xc4 dxc4©]

Dzindzichashvili R. - Alburt L. (Parsippany

(USA),1996)

/(+47@?0 $#@?$#,# ?(?$?@#@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*?@? !"?@?"!" .?@16)&-…

8. ¦c1!? O2O 9. b3 These set2up has

become popular recently. Fortifying his

queenside, White restricts opponent's

counterplay. 9... e5

[9... d5? 10. c5 ¥6d7 11. ¥xd5;

9... ¥c6 10. d5! ¥e5 11. ¤e2²†;

9... e6!? 10. ¥f3 ¥c6 11. ¤e2 ¤d7

12. O2O d5! 13. c5 ¥c8 14. £d2 ¦e8

15. ¦fd1 b6 16. ¤h6 ¤f6› Rubinetti

2 Schmid, Mar del Plata 1970]

10. dxe5 dxe5 11. £xd8 ¦xd8 12. c5!

The point of White's set2up. In spite of

simplifications, he is ousting the

opponent's pieces to passive positions

and gains an initiative. 12... ¥6d7 13.

¤c4! Preparing an attack on the

f72square. 13... ¥c6 14. ¥f3 ¥d4 15.

¥g5! ¦f8 16. ¥ce4! ¥f5 17. O2O ¥f6

18. ¥d6 ¥xd6 19. cxd6 ¤d7 20.

a4²ƒ(xd6) ¤c6 21. ¦fd1 a6 22. f3

¦ad8?! 23. ¤xa6! ¥d5 24. ¤f2 ¤h6

25. h4 ¦fe8

[25... ¦xd6 26. ¤c5Q]

26. ¤c4 ¦xd6 27. ¦d3 ¦d7 28. ¦cd1

¦ed8 29. ¥e4! ¢g7 30. ¥c5 ¦d6 31.

a5 ¢f8 32. b4 ¢e7 33. ¥e4! ¥e3

[33... ¦6d7 34. ¤c5+Q]

34. ¥xd6 1:0,Dzindzichashvili 2 Alburt,

Parsippany 1996

Sanakooev G. - Honfi K. (corr.,1997)

/@+0?@7@‹ $#@'@#,# ?@'@?@#@ @?"?$?@? ?@)@?@?@ @!&?*%@? !@?@?"!" @?.?6?@-

14... ¥a5! Black's first and foremost

task is to repel the white onslaught on

the f72square.

[14... h6!? 15. ¥e4 ¥f8 16. ¥d6 ¦d7

17. O2O ¦e7 18. ¥xc8 ¦xc8 19.

¦fd1 ¢h7 20. h4 f5 21. g3 e4 22.

¥d4 ¥xd4 23. ¤xd4 ¤xd4 24. ¦xd4

¢g7 25. b4 ¦cc7= Gross 2 Bagirov,

Berlin 1996]

15. ¤g5

[15. ¤e2!? ¥c6 16. ¥b5 ¥f8 17.

¥d6 ¥e6 18. ¤c4 ¥cd4 19. ¥g5

¥xg5 20. ¤xg5 ¦d7 21. O2O² Mitkov

2 Toth, Rio de Janeiro 2000]

13

15... ¦e8

[15... ¦f8!? 16. ¤e7 ¥xc4 17. ¤xf8

¢xf8 18. bxc4 ¥xc5©- Honfi 2

Varga, Budapest 1995]

16. ¥b5 e4! Active counterplay is

leitmotif of Black's strategy in the

Alekhine's Defense; otherwise he is at

the risk of falling into a positional

squeeze. In the examined game Black

sacrifices a piece in order to activate his

forces. 17. ¥c7 exf3+ 18. ¥xe8 fxg2

19. ¦g1 ¥xc4 20. ¦xc4 ¥e5! 21. ¦c3

¤g4 22. ¥xg7 ¥f3+! 23. ¦xf3 ¤xf3 24.

¤f6 ¦c8© 25. ¢d2 ¦xc5 26. ¤d4

¦d5 27. ¢e3 ¢f8 28. h4 h5 29. b4 b6

30. a4 ¦d7 31. b5 ¤d5 32. ¤f6 ¦d6 33.

¤b2 ¦d7 ½:½,Sanakooev 2 Honfi, corr.

1997

Variation with 5... exd6

/(+47,?0‹ $#$?$#$# ?(?"?@?@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"?@?"!" .%*16)&-

Variation with 5... exd6.

5... exd6 This quiet move leads to a

symmetrical position with slightly better

chances for White thanks to his small

spatial advantage, and this scenario is

exactly what White is searching for when

he plays the Exchanged Variation. 6.

¥c3 ¤e7 7. ¥f3

[7. h3 O2O 8. ¥f3 ¤f6 9. ¤e2 ¦e8

10. O2O ¥c6 11. ¤f4 ¤f5 12. ¦c1 h6

13. b3 ¦e7 14. £d2 £d7 15. ¦fd1

¦ae8 16. ¤f1= Matanovic 2 Larsen,

Palma de Majorca 1968]

7... ¤g4 8. ¤e2 O2O 9. O2O ¥c6 10. b3

¤f6 The bishop has drawn a bead on

the d42pawn and vacated the e72square

for knight maneuvers. 11. ¤e3 ¦e8

12. £d2 £d7 13. h3 ¤h5 14. ¦fe1 a5

15. a4! ¥b4 16. ¥a2! An introduction

to an interesting strategic plan.

Exchanging piece after piece, White

leaves his opponent with the awkward

knight on b6. 16... ¥xa2 17. ¦xa2

¥c8 18. £c1 h6 19. ¥h2! ¤xe2 20.

¦axe2 £f5 21. ¥g4!±(‘å, x¥c8) ¤g5

22. ¤xg5 ¦xe2 23. ¦xe2 hxg5 24.

¦e8+ ¢h7 25. £e3 ¥b6 26. ¦e7 ¦c8

27. £c3! ¢g8 28. d5 ¢f8 29. ¦e1 ¦e8

[29... ¦a8 30. £e3]

30. ¥e3 £e4 31. £xa5Q £d4 32. £b4

£e4 33. £b5 £d3 34. a5 £c3 35. ¦f1

¥c8 36. b4 b6 37. a6 £a3 38. £d7!

£xa6 39. £xc7 £a3 40. b5 g6 41. £b7

£c5 42. ¦a1 £d4 43. ¦a8 £c5 44.

£c6 ¢e7 45. ¦b8 f5 46. ¦b7+ ¢f8 47.

¦h7 ¦xe3 48. £d7 1:0,Maroczy 2

Gruenfeld, Budapest 1932

Gipslis A. - Larsen B. (Sousse (Tunisia),1967)

14

/@?4?07@‹ $#$?@#$# ?('$?,?@ @?@?@?@? ?@!"?@+@ @!&?*%@? !@?@)"!" .?@1@-6?

11... d5! The fixed white pawn on d4

would be a convenient target for attack.

12. c5 ¥c8! The knight is transferred

via c82e7 to f5 in order to intensify

pressure on the d42pawn. 13. b4 ¥8e7

14. b5

[14. h3? ¤xf3 15. ¤xf3 ¥xb4 16.

¦b1 ¥a6 17. ¦xb7 ¥xc5!]

14... ¥a5 The ¥ñ62a52ñ4 maneuver is

Black's usual reaction to the b32b42b5

advance. 15. h3?! An exchange on f3

is to Black's benefit. Better would have

been

[15. ¥e5 ¤xe2 16. £xe2=]

15... ¤xf3! 16. ¤xf3 c6 17. £d3 ¥c4

18. ¤f4 ¥g6 19. ¤h2 ¤g5 20. bxc6

bxc6 21. ¤d1 ¤f4! 22. ¤c2 ¤xh2+ 23.

¢xh2 £f6³ (xd4) 24. g3 ¦fe8 25. ¢g2

£g5! 26. ¢h2 ¥b2! 27. £f3 £d2 28.

¤xg6 hxg6 29. ¥d1 ¥c4 30. £c3

¦ab8µ(‘b,‘e) 31. ¦c1 ¦e4 32. ¦c2

£xd4 33. £xd4 ¦xd4 34. ¦e1 a5 35.

¢g2 a4 36. ¥c3 a3 37. ¥a4 g5 38. ¦e7

¦b4 39. ¥b6 ¦b2 40. ¦c3 ¦xa2 41.

¥xc4 dxc4 42. ¦c7 ¦dd2 43. ¦f3 c3

0:1,Gipslis 2 Larsen, Sousse 1967

Kurajica B. - Hort V. (Sombor (Yugoslavia),1968)

/@'4?07@ $#$?@#$# ?@'@?,?@ @?"#@?@? ?@?"?@+@ @!&?*%@? !@?@)"!" .?@1@-6?…

13. h3! Here this move is appropriate,

because White is able to play g22g4 on

time, depriving the black knights of the

f52square. 13... ¤f5

[13... ¤xf3 14. ¤xf3 ¥8e7 15. g4! g6

16. ¦e1 b6 17. cxb6 axb6 18. ¦c1²

Kurajica 2 Vukic, Yugoslavia 1969]

14. £d2 h6 15. ¦ad1 ¥8e7?! 16. g4!

The stable center allows White to start a

pawn attack on the kingside. 16... ¤h7

17. h4! ¥g6 18. g5 hxg5 19. hxg5 ¤e7

20. ¢g2±‚» £d7 21. ¦h1 £g4+ 22.

¢f1 £e6 23. ¦h2! b6 24. ¢g2! £g4+

25. ¢h1 £e6 26. ¦g1 bxc5 27. dxc5

¦ad8 28. ¥d4 ¥xd4 29. ¤xd4 f6 30.

£d3! fxg5 31. ¤g4 £c6 32. ¦e1 ¥h4

33. ¦xe7! ¤xd3 34. ¦xg7+ ¢h8 35.

¦xg5+ ¦f6 36. ¦xh4+ 1:0,Kurajica 2

Hort, Sombor 1968

Najer E. - Ivanov V. (Moscow (Russia),1995)

15

/@'4?07@‹ $#$?@#$# ?@'@?,?@ @?"#@?@? ?@?"?@+@ @!&?*%@! !@?@)"!@ .?@1@-6?

13... ¤e6! After this bishop retreat the

g22g4 advance will not win a tempo. 14.

g4

[14. b4 a6 15. b5 axb5 16. ¥xb5

¥8a7 17. a4 b6 18. ¦c1 ¥xb5 19.

axb5 ¥a5› Sznapik 2 Cu.Hansen,

Copenhagen 1982;

14. £d2 b6!? 15. ¥a4 ¥8e7 16. g4

¥g6 17. ¦ac1 ¤d7 18. ¥c3 bxc5 19.

¥xd5 ¤xd4 20. ¤xd4 cxd4 21. ¥xd4

¥xd4 22. £xd4 ¤e6 1/2:1/2

Mortensen 2 Cu.Hansen, Denmark

1984]

14... h6! 15. a3 ¥8e7 16. ¥e1(…

f22f4ƒ»†) g5! This bold pawn move

frustrates White's initiative on the

kingside. 17. ¥g2 ¥g6 18. b4 ¦e8 19.

¤d3 ¥f4! The knight invasion reveals

the seamy side of the g22g4 advance,

which is the exposed white king's

castling position. 20. ¥xf4 gxf4 21.

¤xf4 ¤xd4 22. ¥b5 ¤e5 23. ¤xe5

¥xe5 24. ¥d4 h5! 25. f4 £h4! 26. fxe5

£g3+ 27. ¢h1 £xh3+ 28. ¢g1 £g3+

29. ¢h1 hxg4 30. £d2 £h3+ 31. ¢g1

£g3+ 32. ¢h1 £h3+ 33. ¢g1 £g3+

½:½,Najer 2 Ivanov, Moscow 1995

Modern variation

/(+47,?0 $#$?$#$# ?@?$?@?@ @?@'"?@? ?@?"?@?@ @?@?@?@? !"!@?"!" .%*16)&-…

Modern Variation.

4. ¥f3 ¤g4 5. ¤e2 e6 6. O2O The so

called "Modern Variation" is the most

popular in modern practice of the

Alekhine's Defense. White obtains the

strong center and good prospects on

the queenside. The further scenario

depends on who will be the first: either

White conducts the favorable for him

d42d5 advance or Black forestalls the

enemy with the blockading d62d5

counterblow. 6... ¥c6?! 7. c4 ¥b6 8.

exd6! cxd6 9. d5! Exploiting the knight

position on c6. 9... exd5 10. cxd5 ¤xf3

11. gxf3!

[11. ¤xf3 ¥e5 12. ¤e4 ¤e7 13. ¥c3

O2O=]

11... ¥e5 12. ¤b5+ ¥bd7

[12... ¥ed7 13. £d4! £f6 14. ¦e1+

¤e7 15. £xf6 gxf6 16. ¥c3 ¢d8 17.

f4¬²ƒ-]

13. ¦e1 ¤e7 14. f4! ¥g6 15. f5! ¥ge5

16. ¥c3 a6

[16... O2O? 17. f4Q]

17. ¤xd7+ ¥xd7 18. ¤g5 f6 19. £h5+

¢f8 20. ¤d2±(xe6) £e8 21. £h3 £f7

22. ¦e3 ¢g8 23. ¥e2! ¥e5 24. ¥f4 g5

16

25. ¦g3 h5 26. ¤c3 h4 27. ¦g2 ¢h7

28. ¥e6 £h5 29. f4! g4 30. fxe5!Q

¦hg8

[30... gxh3 31. ¦g7+ ¢h6 32.

¤d2+Q]

31. £d3 dxe5 32. d6 ¤d8 33. £e4

¤b6+ 34. ¢h1 ¦ab8 35. d7 h3 36. ¦g3

¤f2 37. ¦d1 ¤xg3 38. hxg3 1:0,Oll 2

Kaunas, Clichy 1991

Janosevic D. - Korchnoi V. (Sarajevo (Bosnia &

Herzegovina),1969)

/(?47,?0‹ $#$?@#$# ?@?$#@?@ @?@'"?@? ?@?"?@+@ @?@?@%@? !"!@)"!" .%*1@-6?

6... ¤e7 Black finishes his kingside

development and does not hurry to

define a position of the b82knight. 7. c4

¥b6 8. exd6 cxd6 9. ¥c3 O2O 10. ¤e3

d5! The d52square is crucial in the

Alekhine's Defense, therefore Black

begins to fight for it even before he has

completed his development. 11. c5

¤xf3! 12. ¤xf3 ¥c4 13. b4

[13. b3 ¥xe3 14. fxe3 ¥c6 15. a3 b6

16. cxb6 axb6 17. ¥b5 ¤g5 18. ¦e1

£d7= Radovici 2 Bagirov, Polanica

Zdroj 1969]

13... a6 14. £b3 ¤g5! 15. ¦fe1 ¥c6

16. ¦ad1 b6! Undermining the white

pawn chain, Black lessens the value of

the opponent's queenside pawn

majority. 17. cxb6 ¥xb6³ (xc4, xd4)

18. ¤e2 ¤f6 19. a3 g6 20. ¤f1 £e7 21.

¥e2 ¦fc8 22. ¢h1?! a5! 23. b5 a4! 24.

£a2 ¥a5µ 25. ¤d2 ¥b3 26. ¤b4 £d7

27. £b1 ¥c4 28. ¦d3 £xb5 29. ¥c3

£b7 30. ¥xa4 ¥xd4 31. ¥c5 £a7 32.

¥b3 ¥b5 33. ¦f3 ¥bxa3 34. £a2 ¤g7

35. h4 ¥e5 0:1,Janosevic 2 Korchnoi,

Sarajevo 1969

Karpov A. - Bagirov V. (Riga (Latvia),1970)

/(?4?07@ $#@?,#$# ?@?@#@?@ @?"#@?@? ?@'"?@?@ @?&?*)@? !"?@?"!" .?@1@-6?…

13. ¤c1! Keeping his bishop pair,

White intends to oust the black knight

from c4.

[13. ¤f4 ¥c6 14. b3 ¥4a5 15. ¦b1

¤f6 16. ¤e3 b6! 17. cxb6 £xb6 18.

¥a4 £b4 19. a3 £d6 20. ¥c5 ¦fc8=

Geller 2 Korchnoi, Stockholm (izt)

1962]

13... ¥c6 14. b3 ¥4a5 15. ¤e3 b6! 16.

¥a4! ¦b8 17. ¦c1! It is important for

White to hold his outpost on c5 which

secures him a spatial advantage on the

queenside.

[17. cxb6 axb6=]

17... bxc5?!

[17... b5! 18. ¥c3 ¤g5 19. £d2

17

¤xe3 20. fxe3 f5› Boleslavsky]

18. ¥xc5 ¤f6 19. a3! ¥e7 20. ¤e2 ¥f5

21. b4 ¥b7?!

[21... ¥c4! 22. ¤xc4 dxc4 23. ¦xc4

£d5 24. £d3 ¦fd8©]

22. ¤f4! ¥bd6 23. ¤e5! ¤xe5 24. dxe5

¥b7

[24... ¥e4 25. ¥b3±;

24... ¥b5 25. ¤xb5 ¦xb5 26. £a4

¦b8 27. ¥d7 £e8 28. £xa7 ¦a8 29.

£b7 £e7 30. ¦c7!±]

25. ¥b3 £b6 26. ¤d3 ¥e7

[26... a5!? 27. ¤xf5 exf5 28. £d4

£xd4 29. ¥xd4 axb4 30. axb4 ¥d8±]

27. £g4! f5

[27... f6 28. £h4 ¥g6 29. ¤xg6 hxg6

30. £g3±]

28. £d4±ƒ« ¥d8 29. b5 g5 30. a4 ¥g6

31. £a1 £b7 32. ¦fe1 £g7 33. ¥c5

¦f7 34. a5 ¦e7 35. ¥a6 ¦a8 36. ¤f1

¥f7 37. ¥c7 ¦d8 38. ¦c6 ¥f8 39. b6

axb6 40. a6 ¥h6 41. ¦ec1 ¥g4 42. a7

¥xe5 43. ¦6c2 ¥c4 44. a8=£ ¦xa8

45. ¥xa8 b5 46. ¦a2 ¦b7 1:0,Karpov 2

Bagirov, Riga 1970

Gipslis A. - Marovic D. (Yerevan (Armenia),1971)

/(?47@?0 $#$?,#$# ?(?$#@?@ @?@?"?@? ?@!"?@+@ @?@?@%@? !"?@)"!" .%*1@-6?…

8. ¥c3 O2O 9. ¤e3 This plan poses the

most serious problems for Black. White

does not hurry to exchange on d6 and

completes his development. 9... ¥c6

10. exd6! cxd6 11. d5! A soon as the

knight has appeared on c6, White

conducts the standard advance in the

center. 11... exd5

[11... ¤xf3 12. ¤xf3 ¥e5 13. dxe6

fxe6 14. ¤g4! ¥exc4 15. ¤xe6+ ¢h8

16. ¤xb6 ¥xb6 17. £b3 ¤f6 18.

¦ad1²ƒ” Timman 2 Bagirov, Tbilisi

1971]

12. ¥xd5 ¥xd5 13. £xd5!

[13. cxd5 ¤xf3! 14. ¤xf3 ¥e5 15.

¤e2 f5 16. f4 ¥d7 17. £b3 ¤f6=

Short 2 Hort, Dortmund 1986]

13... £c7 14. ¦ad1 ¦ad8 15. ¦d2

The weakness of the d62pawn and

d52square secures White an enduring

advantage in the middlegame. 15...

¥e5 16. b3 ¤e6 17. £d4 b6 18. ¦fd1

h6 19. h3 f5 20. £b2 f4 21. ¤d4 ¤f6 22.

¤c3 ¥xf3+ 23. ¤xf3 ¤xc3 24. £xc3

¦f6 25. a4 a6 26. ¦d3! ¤f7 27. £d2

£c5 28. ¦d4! £e5 29. ¦e1! £c5 30.

¦e7 ¢f8 31. ¦b7 g5 32. b4 £c8 33.

¦xb6 ¤xc4 34. ¦c6 1:0,Gipslis 2

Marovic, Yerevan 1971

Browne W. - Hort V. (San Antonio (USA),1972)

18

/@?4?07@‹ $#@?,#$# ?@'$?@?@ @?@1@?@? ?@!@?@+@ @?@?*%@? !"?@)"!" .?@?@-6?

13... ¤f6 To set off his weaknesses,

Black has to play very vigorously. 14.

¦fd1

[14. £d2 £a5! 15. £xa5 ¥xa5 16.

¦ab1 ¦fe8 17. b3 ¥c6 18. ¦bd1

¦ad8 19. h3 ¤f5 20. g4 ¤g6 21.

¤d3 ¤xd3 22. ¦xd3 ¥b4 23. ¦d2

¤c3 24. ¦dd1 b6„ Borriss 2 Baburin,

Berlin 1992]

14... ¦c8!

[14... ¤e6 15. £d2 £a5 16. ¥d4

£xd2 17. ¦xd2 ¤xd4 18. ¤xd4 ¦fd8

19. ¦ad1 ¦d7 20. ¤c3 ¦ad8 21.

f4±- Liberzon 2 Vaganian, USSR

(ch) Riga 1970]

15. ¦d2

[15. £xd6 £xd6 16. ¦xd6 ¤xb2 17.

¦b1 ¤a3! 18. ¦d3 ¤f5!]

15... £a5„ 16. £xd6?! ¤xf3! 17. ¤xf3

¦cd8! 18. £f4 ¤e5 19. ¦xd8!

[19. £g5 h6!]

19... ¤xf4 20. ¦xf8+ ¢xf8 21. ¤xf4©

¥d4!ƒ(x¦a1) 22. ¤d6+

[22. ¤xb7? ¥e2+°;

22. ¦d1 ¥xf3+ 23. gxf3 £xa2]

22... ¢e8 23. ¤d5

[23. ¤xb7? £b6 24. ¦e1+ ¥e6]

23... £d2! 24. b3 ¢d7 25. ¤e5 ¥e2+

26. ¢f1

[26. ¢h1 f6 27. ¤g3 ¥c1! 28. h3

£b2°]

26... £d3 27. ¢e1 ¥g1!µ 28. ¤f3

¥xf3+ 29. gxf3 ¢e6 30. ¤xg7 f6 31.

¦d1 £xf3 32. ¤f8 £h1+ 33. ¢e2 £xh2

34. ¤b4 £h5+ 35. ¢e1 £h1+ 36. ¢e2

£e4+ 37. ¢f1 ¢f5 38. ¦d5+ ¢g4 39.

¤c5 ¢f3 40. ¢g1 £g6+ 0:1,Browne 2

Hort, San Antonio 1972

Spassky B. - Fischer R. (Reykjavik (Iseland),1972)

/(?47@?0 $#$?,#$# ?@?$#@?@ @?@'"?@? ?@?"?@+@ @?@?@%@? !"!@)"!" .%*1@-6?…

7. h3! An important improvement. White

intends to use an inclusion of h3 and

¤h5 to his benefit. 7... ¤h5 8. c4 ¥b6

9. ¥c3 O2O 10. ¤e3 d5!

[Bad is 10... ¥c6?! , because White

wins an important tempo attacking the

bishop on h5: 11. exd6 cxd6 12. d5!

exd5 13. ¥xd5 ¥xd5 14. £xd5 ¤g6

15. ¦ad1±]

11. c5 ¤xf3 To obtain counterplay,

Black has to secure the c42square for his

knight, because its retreats to c8 or d7

are too passive.

[11... ¥c4 12. ¤xc4 dxc4 13. £e2±]

12. ¤xf3 ¥c4 13. b3 ¥xe3 14. fxe3 b6

[Instead of this standard thrust more

reliable is 14... ¥c6 15. ¦b1 a5 (15...

19

f6 16. exf6 ¤xf6 17. b4 ¥e7 18. ¤g4

£d7 19. ¢h1 ¦ad8 20. e4 dxe4 21.

£b3 ¢h8 22. ¥xe4 ¥d5= Olafsson 2

Andersson, Nice (ol) 1974) 16. a3 b6

17. b4 axb4 18. axb4 bxc5 19. bxc5

¦a3= Petrosian]

15. e4! To use his development lead,

White needs to open up the game. 15...

c6 16. b4

[16. exd5 cxd5 17. b4 ¥c6]

16... bxc5

[16... a5?! 17. a3 axb4 18. axb4]

17. bxc5 £a5

[17... ¥d7 18. £a4±]

18. ¥xd5! White's blows on d5 are

often seen in this variation.

[18. £d3 ¥a6;

18. £e1 ¤h4› (18... ¤d8›);

18. £b3 ¥a6„ … ¦ab8]

18... ¤g5!

[18... exd5 19. exd5 cxd5 20. ¤xd5

¥d7 21. ¦xf7±]

19. ¤h5!?›

[19. £d3!? ¥a6 … ¥b4 (19... ¦d8?

20. ¤h5 g6 21. £f3‚) 20. ¥c3 ¦fd8

21. ¥e2 ¥xc5 22. £c4 ¥a4›

Krogius;

19. h4 ¤h6 (19... ¤xh4) 20. ¥e7+

¢h8 x¥e7]

19... cxd5

[19... g6?! 20. ¥f6+ ¢g7 (20... ¤xf6

21. exf6‚) 21. £g4ƒ Korchnoi]

20. ¤xf7+!

[20. ¦xf7 ¥c6]

20... ¦xf7

[20... ¢h8 21. exd5Q (21. ¤xe6)]

21. ¦xf7 £d2!

[21... ¢xf7? 22. £h5+;

21... ¥c6 22. £g4 ¢xf7 23. ¦f1+

¢g8 (23... ¢e8 24. £xe6+ ¥e7 25.

c6!) 24. £xe6+ ¢h8 25. £xc6ƒ

Keres;

21... ¤e3+ 22. ¢h1 ¢xf7 23. £h5+

¢e7 24. ¦f1 ¥d7 25. £f7+ ¢d8 26.

c6!Q Korchnoi]

22. £xd2 ¤xd2 23. ¦af1 ¥c6= 24.

exd5

[24. ¦c7 dxe4! 25. ¦xc6 (25. ¦ff7?

¤h6µ) 25... e3µ]

24... exd5 25. ¦d7

[25. e6 ¦e8 26. ¦c7 ¥xd4 27. e7

¥e6;

25. ¦7f3 ¥xd4 26. ¦d3 ¤b4

Korchnoi]

25... ¤e3+ 26. ¢h1 ¤xd4 27. e6 ¤e5!

[27... ¤xc5? 28. ¦c1;

27... ¦e8?! 28. ¦d6]

28. ¦xd5 ¦e8 29. ¦e1 ¦xe6 30. ¦d6!

¢f7

[30... ¦xd6 31. cxd6 ¢f7 32. ¦c1!±

xa7]

31. ¦xc6 ¦xc6 32. ¦xe5 ¢f6 33. ¦d5

¢e6 34. ¦h5 h6 35. ¢h2 ¦a6 36. c6

¦xc6 37. ¦a5 a6 38. ¢g3 ¢f6 39. ¢f3

¦c3+ 40. ¢f2 ¦c2+ ½:½,Spassky 2

Fischer, Reykjavik 1972

Geller E. - Bronstein D. (Petropolis (Brazil),1973)

20

/(?4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?@?@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@'"?@?@ @?&?*)@! !"?@?"!@ .?@1@-6?…

13. ¤f4! White should avoid

exchanges, because the black pieces

lack space for maneuvering.

[13. ¤c1 slows down the queenside

development and gives Black an

opportunity to obtain counterplay

undermining the white center with

b72b6 and f72f6: 13... b6! 14. b3

¥a5]

13... ¥c6

[13... ¥xb2 14. £b3 ¥c4 15. £xb7

¥d7±]

14. b3 ¥4a5 15. ¦c1 b6 16. ¥a4! And

again, White tries to hold his outpost on

c5 which secures him a spatial

advantage on the queenside. 16... b5?

A strategic mistake. Since the

queenside has been blocked, White

does not have to worry about the

c52square, and the only thing he has to

care is his e52outpost.

[16... f6!? 17. exf6 ¤xf6 18. cxb6

cxb6 19. b4! ¥xb4 20. £e1 ¥d3 21.

£xe6+ ¢h8 22. ¤c7 £c8 23. £xd5

¥xc1 24. ¦xc1©ƒ Tseshkovsky 2

Alburt, USSR 1974;

16... ¤g5!? 17. ¤xg5 £xg5 18. £d3

¦ab8 19. ¤g4 £f4 20. ¦fd1 f5 21.

exf6 ¦xf6² Geller 2 Timman, Teesside

1975]

17. ¥c3 b4 18. ¥e2 f6 19. exf6 ¤xf6 20.

¤g4 £d7 21. £d3 a6 22. ¦ce1 £f7 23.

¤h2 ¦fe8 24. ¦d1 ¥b7 25. ¢h1 An

introduction to a kingside pawn storm.

25... ¥bd8 26. f4 g6 27. ¤f3 ¥e7 28.

g4±†ƒ» ¥dc6 29. f5! exf5

[29... e5!? 30. dxe5 ¥xe5 31. ¤xe5

¤xe5 32. fxg6 £xg6 33. £xg6+ hxg6

34. ¤xd5+ ¥xd5 35. ¦xd5±]

30. ¤xc7 ¢h8 31. ¤h2 ¦ed8 32.

£e3(… g5†xf4) g5 33. gxf5 ¥xf5 34.

£f2 ¥g7 35. ¤g4 ¦f8 36. ¤e5 ¥e8 37.

¥g3 ¦a7 38. ¤h5 £g8 39. £b2

[39. ¤xe8?! ¥xe5 40. dxe5 ¤g7]

39... ¤xe5

[39... ¥xe5 40. dxe5 ¤g7 41. ¥f5]

40. dxe5 d4 41. ¦xf8 £xf8 42. ¦f1 £g8

43. £f2 ¥g7 44. ¤f7 £d8 45. ¤c4 ¦a8

46. ¥e4 ¥h5 47. £f7

[¹47. ¥d6Q]

47... ¥f4 48. £b7 ¥a5 49. £f7 ¥g6 50.

¤d5 ¦c8 51. ¥d6 ¦c7

[51... ¦xc5 52. £a7! £c7 53.

£a8+Q]

52. £f5 £e7 53. ¥f7+ ¢g7 54. ¥xg5

¦d7 55. e6 ¦c7 56. ¥xh7 1:0,Geller 2

Bronstein, Petropolis 1973

Enklaar B. - Schmidt W. (Wijk aan Zee

(Netherlands),1975)

21

/(?4?07@‹ $#$?,#$# ?@?@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@'"?*?@ @?&?@)@! !"?@?"!@ .?@1@-6?

13... b6! In order not to give the

opponent time for fortifying the

c52outpost, Black undermines it even

before he has completed his own

queenside development. 14. b3 ¥a5

15. ¦c1

[15. b4 ¥c4 16. ¦c1 c6 17. ¤e2 a5!

18. ¤xc4 dxc4 19. a3 axb4 20. axb4

¥a6! 21. b5 ¥b4 22. bxc6 bxc5³

Lukin 2 Bagirov, Cheliabinsk 1975;

15. ¥a4 ¥d7! 16. £d2 ¥c6 17. b4

bxc5 18. bxc5 ¦b8 19. ¦ab1 ¦xb1

20. ¦xb1 £a8!… ¦b8=, Gufeld 2

Palatnik, URS 1973]

15... bxc5 16. dxc5 ¥ac6 17. ¦e1 ¤g5!

The bishop exchange stresses the

e52pawn weakness.

[17... ¥d7?! 18. ¥xd5! exd5 19.

¤xd5 ¥db8 20. b4 a6 21. ¦c4 ¦a7

22. £f3©ƒ Gufeld 2 Palatnik, USSR

(ch) Tbilisi 1973]

18. £d2

[18. ¥xd5!? exd5 19. ¤xg5 £xg5 20.

¤xd5 ¢h8! 21. ¦c4 a5!© Kavalek 2

Schmid, Nice (ol) 1974]

18... ¤xf4 19. £xf4 a5! 20. a3

[20. ¥e2 ¥d7 21. ¥d4 ¥xd4 22.

£xd4 c6 23. a3 ¦b8 24. b4 axb4 25.

axb4 f6!³ Lukin A. 2 Bagirov V., USSR

1974]

20... ¥e7! 21. ¤g4 ¥g6 22. £a4 c6 23.

f4 £c7 24. £d4 ¥d7 25. ¥a4 ¦ab8 26.

¦c3 ¦b7 27. ¢h1 £b8 28. £e3 ¢h8!

Preparing to hit the white center with

f72f6. 29. g3 ¥e7 30. h4 ¦e8 31. ¤d1

f6!³ 32. exf6 ¥xf6 33. ¤c2 ¥f5 34. £d2

¦be7 35. ¦f3 ¥h6! 36. £xa5 e5!©‚

37. fxe5 ¦xe5 38. ¦xe5 £xe5 39. £c3

d4 40. £d3 ¥hg4 41. ¢g1 £d5 42.

¥b6 ¦e1+ 43. ¢g2 £e6 44. ¤d1 ¥e3+

45. ¦xe3 dxe3 46. ¤e2 £e4+ 47. £xe4

¥xe4 48. ¢f3 ¥c3 49. ¢xe3 ¥xe2 50.

¢f2 ¦a1 51. ¢xe2 ¦xa3° ... 0:1

0:1,Enklaar 2 Schmidt, Wijk aan Zee

1975

Cabrilo G. - Haik A. (Vrnjachka Banja

(YUG),1981)

/(?4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?(?@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?@?@ @?&?*+@! !"?@)"!@ .?@1@-6?…

12. gxf3!? An interesting idea. At the

cost of doubling his pawns White retains

control of the c42square thus forcing the

b62knight to retreat, after which Black

will be cramped. 12... ¥c8 Intending

to bring the knight into play via

¥ñ82å72f5. 13. f4! With the idea of

f42f5. 13... f5 This move nips the f42f5

breakthrough in the bud, but leaves

22

Black without any counterplay and condemns him to defend passively.

[13... g6?! does not prevent f42f5:

14. ¢h2 ¢h8 15. f5! gxf5 16. ¦g1

¦g8 17. ¦xg8+ £xg8 18. £d2 ¥d7

19. ¦g1 £e8 20. ¤h6 ¤f8 21. ¥b5!

¥e7 22. ¥xc7 ¤xh6 23. £xh6 £f8

24. £g5 ¦b8 25. ¥b5± Levitina 2

Alexandria, Moscow 1975]

14. b4 ¦f7 15. ¢h2 ¤f8 16. ¤d3

White's long2term plan involves a

queenside offensive. 16... a6 17. ¥e2

¥c6 18. a3 ¥8a7 19. ¥g1! g6 20. ¥f3

¦g7 21. ¦g1 ¤e7 22. £d2 Taking

necessary precautionary measures

against eventual counterplay with g62g5.

22... h6 23. a4 b5 24. axb5 axb5 25.

¦a6 ¦b8 26. ¥e1 £c8 27. ¦a3 ¢h7

28. ¥c2 £b7 29. ¥e1 ¦bg8 30. ¥f3

¦h8 31. ¦ga1 ¢g8 32. £a2 ¥c8 33.

¤d2 ¥b8 34. ¦a8±†(ƒ‘à12à8) c6 35.

¢g2 g5 36. ¢f1! ¤d8 37. ¢e2 ¦hh7

38. £b1! g4 39. hxg4 ¦xg4 40. ¤xf5!

The bishop sacrifice is breaking the

black king's pawn shelter. 40... exf5 41.

£xf5 ¦gg7 42. £e6+ ¢h8 43. f5 ¥d7

44. ¤xh6 ¦g8 45. ¤e3 ¤e7 46. f6

1:0,Cabrilo 2 Haik, Vrnjachka Banja

1981

Kindermann S. - Baburin A. (Germany,1998)

/('4?07@‹ $#$?,#$# ?@?@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?"?@ @?&?*?@! !"?@)"?@ .?@1@-6?

13... ¥c6 Under some favorable

circumstances Black threatens with the

¤xc5 blow. 14. b4 ¤h4! Vacating the

e72square for the ¥c82e72f5 maneuver.

[14... a6 15. f5!? (15. ¢h2 ¤h4 16.

¤d3 g6 17. a3 ¥8e7 18. ¦g1 ¢h8

19. ¤c2 ¥f5 20. ¦g2 ¥ce7 21. ¥e2

f6 1/2:1/2 Spassky 2 Bagirov, Moscow

(tt) 1979) 15... exf5 16. f4 ¥b8©]

15. ¦b1 ¥8e7 16. ¤d3 g6 17. £f3

[17. £g4 ¥f5 18. ¤xf5 exf5 19. £f3

¥e7 20. b5 £d7 21. ¦fc1 £e6=

Schandorff 2 Bagirov, Copenhagen

1993]

17... ¥f5 18. ¤xf5 gxf5 19. £h5 ¢h8

20. ¢h2 ¦g8! 21. £xf7 £e8 22. £xe8

¦axe8 23. ¦g1 ¦xg1 24. ¢xg1 ¢g8

White's extra pawn is of no importance

due to a closed character of the

position. ½:½,Kindermann 2 Baburin,

Germany 1998

Sokolov A. - Veingold A. (URS,1981)

23

/@'4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?@'@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?"?@ @?&?*?@! !"?@)"?@ .?@1@-6?…

14. ¤d3 g6

[14... ¤xc5? 15. dxc5 d4 16. ¤xh7+!

¢xh7 17. £h5+ ¢g8 18. ¥e4!Q]

15. f5! With this standard pawn

sacrifice White opens up his bishops and

weakens the black pawn on d5. 15...

exf5

[15... gxf5? 16. ¢h2 ¢h8 17. ¦g1

¦g8 18. ¦xg8+ £xg8 19. £f3±‚]

16. £f3 ¤xc5! 17. dxc5 d4

[17... ¥xe5 18. £xd5 ¥xd3 19. ¦fd1

£xd5 20. ¥xd5 ¥xb2 (20... ¥e5 21.

¤h6!) 21. ¦d4!±]

18. ¤h6 dxc3 19. e6!!

[19. ¤xf8?! £xf8 20. e6 £xc5 21.

exf7+ ¢xf7 22. ¦ac1 ¥d6 23. ¦xc3

£e5 24. ¤c4+ ¢f6 25. ¦e3 ¥d4³ƒ

Chiburdanidze 2 Bagirov, USSR 1983]

19... ¥d4

[19... ¥e5!? 20. £xb7 £xd3 21.

exf7+! ¢h8 22. ¤f4! (22. ¤xf8 £xh3

23. f4 c6!=) 22... ¥xf7 23. £xa8

£xh3 24. £d5±]

20. exf7+ ¦xf7 21. £xb7 ¥e7 22.

bxc3±-‚ ¥dc6 23. ¤c4 ¦b8 24. £a6

¥e5 25. ¦ad1 £e8 26. ¦fe1 ¥7c6 27.

f4 ¥f3+ 28. ¢f1 ¥xe1 29. ¦xe1 £d7

30. ¤e6 £d2 31. ¤xf7+ ¢xf7 32. £c4+

1:0,Sokolov 2 Veingold, URS 1981

Sutovsky E. - Wells P. (Budapest (Hungary),1993)

/@'4?07@‹ $#$?,#$# ?@'@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?"?@ @?&)*?@! !"?@?"?@ .?@1@-6?

14... b6! As a rule, Black is unable to

prevent the f42f5 breakthrough by

means of g72g6, therefore the best way

to oppose the white kingside attack is

active counterplay.

[14... ¤h4!? 15. f5 exf5 16. ¤xf5 g6

17. ¤c2 ¢h8 18. f4 f5! 19. a3 ¥8e7

20. £f3 £d7 21. b4 ¥d8 22. ¤b3 c6

23. ¥e2 ¥e6= Nijboer 2 Bosch, the

Netherlands (ch) 1995]

15. £a4 ¥xd4! 16. ¤xd4 bxc5 17. ¤xc5

[17. ¤e3 d4]

17... ¤xc5 18. £c6 ¤b6 19. £xa8

£h4©‚ (x£a8) 20. ¢g2 ¥e7 21. £b7

g5! 22. ¥e2 gxf4 23. ¥g1 £g5+ 24.

¢h1 ¢h8 25. ¤e2 ¦g8 26. ¤f3 ¥g6

27. £a6 ¥xe5 28. £e2 h5 29. b4 f6 30.

a4 £h4 31. ¤g2 [...] ½:½,Sutovsky 2

Wells, Budapest 1993

[31... £g5 32. ¤f3=]

Aseev K. - Bagirov V. (Berlin (Germany),1990)

24

/@'4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?@'@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?"?@ @?&?*?@! !"?@)"?@ .?@1@-6?…

14. f5!? As we have already seen, the

f42f5 breakthrough in different situations

is a leitmotif of White's strategy. Here

Black has not yet vacated the e72square

for his knight. 14... exf5 15. ¤f3 ¤g5!

[15... ¤h4 16. ¤xd5 ¥8e7 17. ¤xc6!

bxc6 18. £h5 f4 19. £xh4 fxe3 20.

fxe3± Lukin 2 Yuneev, Daugavpils

1989;

15... f4 16. ¤xf4 ¤g5 17. ¤g3 ¥8e7

18. ¤g4 f5 19. exf6 ¦xf6 20. f4 ¤h6

21. £d3 ¢h8 22. f5!±ƒ” Sax 2

Ivanchuk, Tilburg 1989]

16. ¥xd5 f4! 17. ¤xf4 ¤xf4 18. ¥xf4

¥8e7!© 19. b3

[19. d5 1/2:1/2 Gallagher 2 Bagirov,

Eupen 1993]

19... ¦b8! 20. ¤e4?!

[20. d5 ¥xe5 21. ¤g2=]

20... £xd4 21. £xd4 ¥xd4 22. ¦fd1

¦fd8¬³ƒ(xe5) 23. ¦d3 ¥dc6 24. e6 f5!

25. ¤g2 ¦xd3 26. ¥xd3 ¦d8 27. ¥f4

g6 28. ¦e1 ¢g7 29. ¤xc6 bxc6! 30.

¢g2 g5 31. ¥e2 ¢f6µ 32. h4 gxh4 33.

¥f4 ¦d4 34. ¢f3 ¦e4 35. ¦xe4 fxe4+

36. ¢xe4 ¥d5 37. ¥e2 ¥e7 38. ¥d4 h3

39. ¥f3 ¥d5 40. e7 ¢xe7 41. ¢f5 ¥f6

42. ¢f4 ¢e6 43. ¢g3 ¥e4+ 44. ¢xh3

¥xf2+ 45. ¢h4 ¢d5 46. ¢g5 0:1,Aseev

2 Bagirov, Berlin 1990

Kobalija M. - Nalbandian T. (Moscow

(Russia),1999)

/('4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?@?@#@?@ @?"#"?@? ?@?"?@?@ @?&?*!@? !"?@)"?" .?@1@-6?…

It is interesting to note that similar

positions with the white pawn standing

on h2 (i.e. without an inclusion of h22h3

and ¤g42h5) are dangerous for Black

due to the fact that the white queen gets

the h32square, which substantially

increases White's attacking potential on

the kingside. 12. f4 ¤h4?!

[¹ 12... f5 ²]

13. ¤d3 g6 14. f5! exf5 15. £f3 c6

[15... ¥e7 16. £h3!]

16. ¢h1 ¢h8 17. ¦g1 ¥a6 18. ¤xf5!

¥e7

[18... gxf5 19. ¤h6 ¦g8 20. ¦xg8+

£xg8 21. ¦g1Q]

19. ¤c2 ¥g8 20. £h3 ¥c7 21. ¦g4

¤e7 22. ¦ag1 £d7 23. f4!±‚ ¦ae8 24.

f5 ¤d8 25. ¥e2! b6 26. ¥f4 g5 27.

£xh7+! ¢xh7 28. f6+ ¢h6

[28... ¢h8 29. ¦xg5 ¦xe5 30. dxe5

¥xf6 31. exf6Q]

29. ¦h4+! gxh4 30. ¥e6+ ¢h5 31.

¤d1# 1:0,Kobalija 2 Nalbandian,

Moscow 1999

25

Vogt L. - Neckar L. (Leipzig (Germany),1976)

/(?4?07@ $#$?,#$# ?(?@#@?@ @?@#"?@+ ?@!"?@?@ @?&?*%@! !"?@)"!@ .?@1@-6?…

11. b3!? Now the black knight at b6 is

deprived of jumping to c4, but Black

gets a tempo to prepare for White's

queenside offensive. 11... ¥c6 12. c5

¥d7 13. b4 a6 14. £b3 f6! 15. ¥xd5!

The standard knight sacrifice. 15...

exd5

[15... fxe5!? 16. ¥xe7+ £xe7 17.

dxe5 ¤xf3 18. ¤xf3 ¦xf3! 19. gxf3

¥dxe5© Ljubojevic 2 V.Kovacevic,

Rovinj/Zagreb 1975]

16. £xd5+ ¢h8 17. e6 ¤g6 18. ¥h4!

[18. exd7 ¤f7 19. £e4 £xd7]

18... ¥xc5!

[18... ¥db8 19. ¥xg6+ hxg6 20.

£c4±©ƒ”]

19. ¥xg6+ hxg6 20. £xd8 ¦fxd8 21.

dxc5 ¥xb4 22. ¦ab1 a5 23. a3 ¥d5 24.

¦xb7 ¥xe3 25. fxe3 ¤xc5©® 26.

¦xc7 ¦ac8 27. ¦xc8 ¦xc8 28. ¤b5

¢g8 29. ¦d1 ¤xa3 30. ¦d7 ¢f8 31.

¦f7+ ¢g8 32. ¢f2 ¤c5 33. ¢f3 ¤b4

34. g4 g5 35. ¤a4 ¤a3 36. ¦a7 ¢f8 37.

¦xa5 ¤e7 38. ¦a7 ¦b8 39. ¤c2 ¦c8

40. ¤a4 ¦d8 41. ¤d7 ¦b8 42. ¢e4 g6

43. ¤c6 ¦d8 44. ¦b7 ¦c8 45. ¤d5

¦d8 46. ¢d4 ¦c8 47. e4 ¦a8 48. ¦b3

¦a4+ 49. ¢d3 ½:½,Vogt 2 Neckar,

Leipzig 1976

Unzicker W. - Dankert P. (Munich (Germany),1979)

/@?4?07@‹ $#$?,#$# ?('@#@?@ @?"#"?@+ ?@?"?@?@ @!&?*%@! !@?@)"!@ .?@1@-6?

12... ¥c8 This standard knight

maneuver leads to quieter play because

it excludes the destroying sacrifice on

d5. 13. b4 a6

[13... ¤xf3!? 14. ¤xf3 ¤g5 15. b5

¥a5 16. ¤xg5 £xg5 17. ¤e2 ¥e7

18. f4 £h6 19. ¤d3 b6 20. ¢h2

¦ad8 21. £e2 f6 22. ¦ae1 f5 23.

¦c1 g5!› Kovalev 2 Dankert,

Germany (Bundesliga) 1992]

14. £b3 ¤xf3! 15. ¤xf3 ¤g5! An

exchange operation, vacating the

e72square for the knight. 16. ¦ad1

¤xe3 17. fxe3 £g5 18. ¥e2 ¥8e7= 19.

¥f4 ¥f5 20. ¤g4 ¥ce7 21. ¢h2 h5! 22.

¤xf5 ¥xf5 23. ¦f3 h4!³ƒ» 24. £d3 c6

25. ¦g1 ¦ae8 26. a4 a5 27. b5 cxb5 28.

axb5 ¥g3 29. ¥e2 ¥e4 30. ¥c3?

£g3+! [...] 0:1,Unzicker 2 Dankert,

Munich 1979

[31. ¦xg3 hxg3+ 32. ¢h1 ¥f2#]

26