Upload
judicialfraud
View
71
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CORRUPTION IN U.S. COURTS
Citation preview
DEFENDANT STANLEY F. BIRCH (JR)
RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF ILLICIT ACTS
1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Corrupt U.S. Circuit Judge
Stanley F. Birch, Jr., in his private individual capacity and official capacity. Defendant
Birch’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and official capacity.
FABRICATIONS OF “RULE 38 MOTION”
2. Defendant Crooked Judge Birch fabricated a “Rule 38 Motion” by Defendant Forger K. M.
Wilkinson. No “Rule 38 motion” by Def. Forger Wilkinson could be found in the official
records of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
CONSPIRACY TO FABRICATE “RULE 38 MOTION”
3. Def. Corrupt Birch conspired with other Officials to fabricate a “Rule 38 Motion”, which
Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson had never signed and/or filed.
FALSIFICATION OF “ORDERS”
4. Crooked Birch falsified “motions” and “orders”. E.g., on 03/05/09, Corrupt Birch falsified a
motion for sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal, Doc. # 386-4, Case No.
2:2007-cv-00228.
5. Corrupt Birch knew that the fraudulently pretended “grant” of a non-existent “motion”
was a fraud and extortion scheme on the public record.
6. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never
filed any motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal, Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Defendant Corrupt
Birch concealed that any time to file the non-existent “Rule 38 motion” had expired on
08/08/2009. See 11th Cir. R. 38-1 and Dockets.
2
CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT
7. Crooked Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to extort fees and Plaintiffs’
property under fraudulent pretenses of a fictitious “Rule 38 Motion”, which Def. Birch
knew had never existed.
CAUSING DEFENDANT CIRCUIT CLERK OF COURT TO FALSIFY ENTRIES
8. Def. Crooked Birch caused the Defendant Clerk of the U.S. Circuit Court to falsify an
“entry” of a “Rule 38 motion”, which had never existed or been filed and signed by
Defendant Appellee “land parcel” Forger K. M. Wilkinson.
CONSPIRACY TO CAUSE DEF. CIRCUIT CLERK TO FALSIFY DOCKET
9. Defendant Crooked Circuit Judge Birch conspired with other Judges, Defendants, judicial
panelists, and Officials to falsify docket entries and in particular, falsify a “Rule 38 motion”
“entry”.
RECORD FRAUD AND EXTORTION
10. Defendant Birch knew and fraudulently concealed that Def. Forger Wilkinson had never
submitted and/or filed any “bill of costs” for “attorney’s fees” or “costs” in the amount of
“$5,000.00”.
DECEPTION & TRICKERY
11. Def. Corrupt Judge Birch deceived the 11th Circuit about the record lack of any “costs” in
the amount of “$5,000.00” and arbitrarily and capriciously fabricated “$5,000.00” in a
publicly recorded conspiracy to extort fees and Plaintiff whistleblowers’ property.
3
CONSPIRACY TO RETALIATE AGAINST PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS
12. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to retaliate against the
Plaintiffs under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal purposes of
extorting fees and property from the Plaintiffs.
CONSPIRACY TO COERCE THE PLAINTIFF RECORD OWNERS
13. Defendant Birch conspired with other Defendants and Officials to coerce the Plaintiffs to
refrain from prosecuting and communicating the commission of publicly recorded
Government crimes under color of “frivolity” and a fictitious “Rule 38 motion” for criminal
purposes of extorting fees and property …