21

Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance
Page 2: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Decides if laws violate the Constitution

Page 3: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Judges cases of national significance

Page 4: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Administer the oath of office of President of the United States (Pres. Obama sworn in by John

Roberts)

Page 5: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Attend the State of the Union Address

Page 6: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Article III of the Constitution has only one qualification

What is it?

Page 7: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Answer: Any person who does not have a criminal record

Page 8: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Most Supreme Court justices have considerable experience as judges in lower courts.

They are nominated by the President, and then are approved by the Senate.

Supreme Court Justices have tenure and can only be impeached by a majority of both houses of Congress

Page 9: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Front row (L-R): Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, and Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. Back Row (L-R), Associate Justice Samuel Alito Jr., Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

( September 28, 2009 - Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images North America)

Page 10: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/

Page 11: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

The Supreme Court is supposed to be impartial, however, politics can have an effect on the decisions made by the court.

HOW?

Page 12: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Just as individuals have political biases, so do judges. In an ideal world they would not, but it is a fact of life that they do.

Judges can be either Conservative or Liberal. In your groups discuss what this might mean in terms of the way judges adjudicate Constitutional issues… For instance, how might a conservative judge adjudicate gay marriage rights, or abortion? What about a liberal?

Page 13: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Tend to favor status quo over change.

Usually rule in favor of establishment/institutions over individuals.

Often make judgments that change existing laws or practices.

Often favor the individual over the establishment.

Liberal

Page 14: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Tend to favor status quo over change.

Usually rule in favor of establishment/institutions over individuals.

Often make judgments that change existing laws or practices.

Often favor the individual over the establishment.

Liberal

Page 15: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Moderate judges tend to stay to the political center. This means that their judgments are difficult to predict.

Page 16: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Kennedy: the swing vote; considered a conservative; sometimes votes with the liberal faction

Alito: consistently conservative

Roberts: consistently conservative

Scalia: extremely conservative

Thomas: extremely conservative

Ginsberg: very liberal, consistently votes against the conservatives

Breyer: consistently liberal

Sotomayor: consistently votes with the progressive bloc

Kagan: expected centrist-progressive, no record of jurisprudence (newest member of court)

Liberal

Page 17: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

President chooses new Justices for Supreme Court. President will choose a judge who shares his political ideology… This will affect the how judgments are made and therefore the social climate of the country. The importance of this fact is often overlooked by voters, but is highly important!

Pres. Obama introduces Elena Kagan.

Page 18: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

You will use the Justice fact sheet to find out about each if the nine judges on the SC.

Due Monday!

Page 19: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

You must have a Constitutional issue .

It must be significant.

You must have correct standing (connection to the issue). You cannot bring suit for someone else!

You must have gone through the appeals process in lower courts.

Page 20: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of.

Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

Page 21: Decides if laws violate the Constitution Judges cases of national significance

Now you know about the Supreme Court, we will examine some historical cases.

First up… Roe v. Wade (1973). This will be the subject of your next journal, and a debate.