Upload
duonghanh
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WIMEZINE
The difference between who you are and who you want
to be, is what you do. . . . Follow your heart, and do
something every day that your future self will thank you
for. —Bill Phillips
As I reflect on the conversations I had with scholars
during the summer of 2016, I am reminded of Bill
Phillips’ inspirational discourse on how we can nurture
our future selves. For nine years, I have interacted with
some of the most intelligent, passionate, and motivated
students in the United States and have read compelling
personal statements that exemplify Phillips’ theory.
These statements expose the paths that aspiring
physicians take to prepare for a career in medicine.
My mind spins when I sit and muse on the impact that
Writing in Medical Education (WiME) has on scholars’
and teachers’ lives. WiME is a place where aspiring
physicians apply and further develop their critical
literacies. WiME is also a place where my colleagues
and I cultivate leaders.
I appreciate the educators who helped me deliver the
2016 writing curriculum: Matthew Spencer, Whitney
Wingate, and Joan Nambuba.
I am forever grateful to Dr. Armstrong, Dr. Wigfall, Ms.
Cullins, and Ms. Coward for creating spaces for me to
engage with scholars who “do something every day that”
moves them closer to their dream of becoming
healthcare practitioners and change agents.
It is my hope that you enjoy the stories that are captured
in volume two of WiMEzine.
—Dr. Shirley E. Faulkner-Springfield
Inside This Issue
Message from the Editor 1
Gabriel D. Perez-Cordero 2
Bianca Aguilar 3
Rosanna L. Escobar-Spadina 4
Claudia Rodriquez 5
Candace Barr 6
Samuel Portillo 7-8
Duke University Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute (SBSI), formally the Summer Medical and Dental Education Program (SMDEP), will accept applications until March 1, 2017.
The 2017 Institute dates are June 10-July 21, 2017.
The following is a link to the SBSI website: https://sbsi.duhs.duke.edu.
Our Name has Changed, but not our Mission!
Newsletter Date
Volume 1, I ssue 1
A Message from the Editor
WiMEzine is a yearly publication that celebrates scholars’ accomplishments in Writing in Medical Education (WiME)
Volume 2, Issue 1 December 2016
For two years,
I have been involved
in orofacial malformation
research at the University of Puerto Rico, Medical
Sciences Campus. My job as a recruiter requires me to
effectively deliver information to potential participants
who become cases or controls. Most families are
reluctant to confide in me, a young aspiring doctor.
Nevertheless, each day, I recruit eight or more families.
To fill the recruitment sheets, I exhibit characteristics
that I expect health providers to possess: honesty and
compassion.
My most memorable participant was a three-month-old
female Puerto Rican infant who had a cleft lip with a
cleft palate. Her parents’ first visit to the clinic was
stressful, and I was intimidated because they were my
first clients, though I was well-trained and worked
among well-trained medical experts. The child’s parents
could not accept the fact that their baby was born with
an anomaly. After briefly talking with them, I learned
that they were hopeless and lonely, so I put the
recruitment sheet aside and sat with them in the waiting
room.
After spending more time with them, they changed their
attitude about their daughter’s birth defect and about the
study. The disheartened and confused parents asked if
the anomaly was hereditary, a question that
demonstrated their interest in learning more about their
daughter’s condition.
I addressed their concerns, offering as much
information as I could about the anomaly, the surgical
procedure, and the specialist who would perform
surgery on their child.
While my interaction with them produced hope and
trust among us, I also experienced anger and happiness.
I was angry because their initial reluctance to
participate in the study was due to their sense of
isolation and their misunderstanding about their child’s
anomaly. I was happy because I was there for them,
and they gave me a purpose for recruiting participants
who benefited from the study.
One month after their visit to the clinic, a nurse told me
that a couple was looking for me. I found them and
learned that my first potential client would participate
in our research study. One year later, the couple’s
beautiful angel got her first surgery. After working four
months as a recruiter, I became the group leader of
fourteen undergraduate recruiters whom I trained how
to interact with potential participants, as I had
interacted with my first participants.
I look forward to becoming a part of a team that not
only sustains and prolongs life, but that also improves
the quality of life for people who cannot afford quality
healthcare.
What are Scholars Doing to Nurture their Future Selves? 2
Gabriel D. Perez-Cordero Chemistry Major Class of 2019 University of Puerto Rico
“To fill the recruitment sheets, I exhibit
characteristics that I expect health providers
to possess: honesty and compassion.”
As an anatomy and
physiology major at
the University of Arizona, my days are filled with
science courses. My education has taught me that
science is important; it is the backbone of the medical
profession.
In Writing in Medical Education (WiME), I learned that
there can be no science or medicine without critical
thinking, reading, listening, speaking, and writing
skills. Another important lesson I learned in WiME is
that the liberal arts and the sciences are more alike than
I thought and that I do not have to choose between the
sciences and the humanities. The most important lesson
I learned is that writing can help me effectively
communicate who I am to medical school admissions
committees, communicate with patients, and
communicate my research to my colleagues and to the
public.
So, yes, pre-medical and medical students should study
communication.
The assignment that convinced me that premedical
students should study communication was a literature
review. I used two sources to complete the assignment.
The first source was a 2016 editorial titled “Case
Reports in Medical Education: A Platform for Training
Medical Students, Residents, and Fellows in Scientific
Writing and Critical Thinking” by Aleksandra G.
Florek and Robert P. Dellavalle. Florek and Dellavalle
assert that case reports have numerous benefits. Case
reports prepare potential doctors for a career in
medicine and teach them how to review literature, how
to present clinical data to physicians, and how to
publish their findings. Case reports also document rare
diseases and disorders, write Florek and Dellavalle.
The second source I reviewed was a 2014 research
article titled “The Clinical Case Report: A Review of its
Merits and Limitations” by Trygve Nissen and Rolf
Wynn. Nissen and Wynn’s article appears more objec-
Bianca Aguilar Anatomy & Physiology Major Class of 2019 University of Arizona
Should Pre-Medical Students Study Communication? 3
tive than Florek and Dellavalle’s editorial because
Nissen and Wynn identify the benefits and the
shortcomings of case reports. Similar to Florek and
Dellavalle, Nissen and Wynn maintain that case reports
are descriptive educational tools that identify new and
rare symptoms and illnesses, generate new theories, and
are “natural experiments that solve ethical constraints.”
In contrast, according to Nissen and Wynn, case reports
do not offer quantitative data or prove cause and effect
relationships, are often misunderstood, are written after
events occur, and reveal patients’ private health
information.
The literature review taught me that case reports are
complex, risky, and valuable, and they improve students’
communication skills. Even though I did not write a case
report, writing the review changed how I write. After I
returned to the University of Arizona, I applied my new
skills to my organic chemistry lab reports so I could
produce clear and succinct two-page lab reports. Much
like I structured the literature review, which is a research
story, I synthesize information, organize my ideas, and
present details that show how experiments are conducted
and why certain results are produced. By structuring lab
reports like a story, I deepen my understanding of
experiments and create a balance between the sciences
and the humanities.
Despite the skills I learned in WiME, my writing is not
where I want it to be. I still overwrite, and my writing is
repetitive. I rewrote this article four times before I
condensed it enough for it to have a solid focus.
In many ways, learning how to write is like learning
medicine—there is always more to do, more to learn,
more to achieve. Doctors should always strive to be
better for their patients. By becoming a better writer, I
will become a better thinker and learner. And at the end
of the day, these skills will make me a better doctor. That
is why effective writing and speaking skills are important
in medicine.
“So, yes, premedical and medical students
should study communication.”
“Writing is Painful!”
4
I never knew writing
could be painful. When
I began writing a personal statement to medical school
admissions committee members at Duke University
about how my brother has influenced my life, I
experienced pain.
My brother was diagnosed with Autism when he was
two years old. While my mother became his primary
caregiver, I also cared for my brother. When we were
younger, I helped my brother complete his homework
assignments, and I still help him improve his social
skills. When we go out in public such as to the movies
and the mall, I often have to defend him and his
behavior. Too many people do not understand and do
not try to understand how his environment affects his
behavior.
Having to share my experiences, my burdens,
frightened me. I was frightened about what my
audience would think: Would my audience feel pity?
Would my audience relate to my situation? Would my
audience believe me? Should I write about another
topic? All these questions ran through my mind.
The thing about writing is that it’s permanent. Writing is like having a conversation with people, but not knowing whether their intentions for reading your words are to be informed or to be critical. So I feel anxious when I write because I struggle to find the perfect words to express my ideas to people who might misinterpret my words and judge me. There is nowhere to hide when I write: I bare it all. I put a part of my soul, a part of what makes me me into my writing. To know I can be judged by my writing, by my thoughts, by being me . . . What could be more painful than that?
Eventually, I realized how I could ease my pain and
diminish my fright.
“I want to show them how my brother has made me a
better person,” I concluded.
With this in mind, I started writing a revised statement
about how my brother is a blessing, not a burden. He
helped shaped me into the person I am today. The
moment I began writing about him as someone who
inspires me I felt free. I felt like a burden had been lifted
off my shoulders because I was able to share my story
with a committee about my brother and share my story
with my brother.
Although I feel better about my personal statement, I
still believe writing is painful, regardless of the topic.
One of the most important lessons I learned in WiME is
that before I painfully scatter parts of myself on the
computer screen, I must read the requirements that a
medical school admissions committee has created for
me so I can understand my audience and do a better job
of meeting my audience’s expectations.
As I think about my experiences in WiME, I believe I
was afraid to tell my story to my peers and professor,
although they were exceptionally nurturing. WiME
helped me learn how to tell my story, which helped me
learn how to write my story.
My advice to premedical students who do not plan to
become professional writers or to study writing is:
Write. Write everything. Write with passion and without
fear of being judged. And most important, write with
pain. Do not deprive the world or yourself of who you
are. Share your pain. Share your triumphs. Share your
story with an audience of committee members who will
determine whether you will become a medical student in
their school of medicine.
Rosanna L. Escobar-Spadina Molecular Biology Major Class of 2018 University of Puerto Rico
The Summer Medical
and Dental Education
Program (SMDEP)
exceeded my expectations. I was told about SMDEP by
one of my cousins who completed the program at
Columbia University. Therefore, I expected rigorous
classes and unique shadowing experiences.
Biochemistry and organic chemistry prepared me for
challenging science classes at my home institution. Not
only did the program prepare me academically, but it
also prepared me socially and psychologically, as I
learned how to interview for medical school, how to
interact with patients, and how to cope with stress. The
most important takeaways are how much I grew and
how much I learned about myself.
My growth involved answering one primary question:
Why do you want to be a doctor? It seems like a simple
question, but in reality, it is one of the most difficult
questions I have ever answered. Before I became a
SMDEP scholar, my answer to the question was “I want
to help people.” Although this is true, every physician
wants to help people or should want to help people.
Thus, I had to discover the answer to several questions
and three of them were: What makes me unique? What
will make me an outstanding physician? Why do I want
to help people? Discovering reasonable responses to my
own query took six weeks of exploring, thinking,
listening, and writing.
In Writing in Medical Education, my peers and I were
asked to construct a personal statement to one medical
school that we selected. I chose Duke University School
of Medicine (DUSOM). In my first draft, I discussed
my struggles as an immigrant. After I read my draft
aloud in class, Dr. Faulkner-Springfield urged me to
change my narrative in ways that might better express
my reasons for becoming a physician. I walked out of
class frustrated, furious at my professor. I asked myself:
“What would I write about? What is my story?” My
experiences as an immigrant have made me who I am.
I felt like I had nothing to offer Duke University.
Through a learning process that included feedback from Dr.
Faulkner-Springfield, my classmates, and other professors, I
realized that my struggles did not define me. Instead, the
way I overcame my struggles has made me who I am. This
realization did not come easily.
My family and I immigrated to the United States from Cuba
when I was eight years old, and my parents and grandmother
never learned English. At a young age, I found myself
translating for my family and serving as a bridge between
our Cuban and American cultures. However, I never
understood that my role as a medical translator made me
love medicine and want to help people who feel
marginalized in the American healthcare system.
Furthermore, I selected DUSOM as the audience for my
personal statement, but I ignored my audience and its
personal statement guidelines. Dr. Faulkner-Springfield
asked me to reframe my immigrant story and contextualize
my experiences so I could demonstrate how I have
developed characteristics at home, at school, and in
healthcare settings that are preparing me for medical school
at Duke. She went on to deduce that my identity as an
immigrant is nominal compared to my identity as an
advocate for my grandmother who often misinterpreted her
doctors’ words and body language. When I became a
translator for my grandmother, sometimes I used Google
Translate to decode the complex medical jargon her
monolingual doctors used to explain her critical condition.
Before I received Dr. Faulkner-Springfield’s unanticipated
feedback and reflected on it, I could not imagine the
magnitude of my performance as a liaison between my
grandmother and her doctors.
I spent countless hours revising my statement that eventually
showed my passion for medicine. I have learned to persist,
listen, and be open to all suggestions, even if I do not accept
all of them. Dr. Faulkner-Springfield’s comment that I
considered harsh actually taught me much about myself and
about context-specific knowledge and skills.
In a few years, I will have more precise responses to my
questions. In addition to majoring in biology, I will minor in
Spanish and become a certified medical interpreter. Today,
one of my strongest qualities is being bilingual—my ability
to talk with and speak for Spanish-speakers whose voices are
not heard in the healthcare system. Without WiME and
SMDEP, I am not sure when I would have come to this
realization.
Claudia Rodriquez Biology Major Chemistry & Spanish Minor Class of 2019 Florida State University
Writing, Speaking, Listening, Thinking, Engaging, and Becoming . . .
5
I told my parents
I wanted to be a
doctor when I was in
elementary school. Their reaction to my childhood
dream made me feel like the job was important, so I hit
the track running. When I was in elementary school, I
volunteered at The Arch of High Point and interacted
with clients who had disabilities that ranged from
Autism to Down syndrome. I surrounded myself with
science, medicine, animal research, and great minds.
Fifteen years later, I was accepted into the Duke
University Summer Medical and Dental Education
Program, where I excelled in science courses.
However, I had not taken a writing course since my first
year in college, and I was a junior. I had been so
focused on excelling in science courses, the classes that
mattered to medical school admissions committee
members, that I could not remember the last time I had
read or written a literary text. Before WiME, I had
tunnel vision. I knew what I wanted to do, so I
programmed myself to meet the requirements that
would help me become a physician. Was I just going
through the motions—following a strict set of curricula
requirements—and forgetting that doctors work with
human beings?
WiME gave me an opportunity to reflect on who I am
and who I am becoming. During our large-group
meeting on the first day of class, Dr. Faulkner-
Springfield asked, “Who are you?” The adjectives I
used to describe myself related to the sciences.
“Without the sciences, I’m nothing,” I whispered to
myself.
After I was challenged by the question: “Why do you
want to become a doctor,” I became aware that the rela-
tionship I had formed with science was unhealthy. I did
not know why I wanted to become a doctor.
The personal statement assignment and writing
conferences helped me figure out how I had gotten to
that place and who I was outside of science. They
helped me see my multiple identities: a researcher, a
scholar, an advocate, and a humanitarian. Once I was
able to recognize my whole self, answering those
challenging questions with honest answers was not
difficult. I conduct research on animals, and I work with
human beings. I am the founder and president of a
nonprofit organization for homeless women; I volunteer
at homeless shelters; I talk with students at middle and
high schools about homelessness and health disparities.
To offer comprehensive, quality healthcare to people in
my community and to help eliminate health disparities
in my community are two major reasons I want to
become a doctor.
I must admit that I was reluctant to write a personal
statement about Candace the advocate and humanitarian
because I had always been told that I should write about
science if I want to be taken seriously.
WiME helped me understand that I do not have to
separate the sciences from the liberal arts.
Reading has become incorporated into my daily routine.
Now I read newspapers, short stories, and books.
Currently, I’m reading Sonia Nazario’s Enrique’s
Journey. After I completed my personal statement, I
also started an online journal. Writing has become an
outlet for me to express Candace’s voice, a voice that
does not include other people’s ideas and expectations.
Candace Barr Neuroscience Major Class of 2018 Georgia State University
“Before WiME, I had tunnel vision. I knew what I
wanted to do, so I programmed myself to meet the
science requirements that would help me become a
physician.”
Writing, Speaking, Listening, Thinking, Engaging, and Becoming . . .
6
Samuel Portillo Bioinformatics & Biology Major Chemistry Minor Class of 2019 Virginia Commonwealth University
Who should read Black Man in a White Coat?
Everyone should read Damon Tweedy’s memoir,
particularly premedical students, medical students, and
people who believe that we live in a post-racial society.
Regardless of your race, gender, or sexuality, you will
learn valuable lessons about how the American
healthcare system perpetuates inequalities and injustices
that are evident in the wider society. Equally important,
you will learn how one Black man uses racism to
motivate him to excel in medical school and in his
white, male-dominated profession. Readers cannot
immerse themselves in Tweedy’s 294-page book and
emerge unchanged.
At the graduation ceremony of the Summer Medical
and Dental Education Program (SMDEP), I became the
recipient of the Outstanding Performance in Writing in
Medical Education Award and received a copy of Black
Man in a White Coat: A Doctor's Reflections on Race
and Medicine (2015) by Damon Tweedy. The book is
separated into three parts: Disparities, Barriers, and
Perseverance. This non-fiction book explores Tweedy’s
journey to and through medical school at Duke
University, where he matriculated in 1996. He is also a
graduate of Yale Law School, an assistant professor of
psychiatry at Duke University Medical Center, and a
staff physician at the Durham VA Medical Center.
Dr. Tweedy was no stranger to me. He spoke to my
peers and me about halfway through SMDEP. I
remember listening to him talk about his story of being
among the few Black students in his medical school
classes, a story we had already heard from many
speakers at that point in the program. Dr. Tweedy also
discussed his own problem with hypertension, despite
becoming someone who should have been a model of
good health for Black people.
His story stuck with me for a while, but as my workload
increased and the life stories of minority pioneers in
medicine became a recurring theme, Tweedy’s story
eventually became just another lunch lecture.
Tweedy’s narrative did not begin to positively influence
me until I returned home to Centreville, Virginia. I used
the rest of the summer to reflect on SMDEP and to read
Tweedy’s book. As I travelled with him through his
journey, I began to understand his fixation on minority
health disparities and barriers that minority patients and
minority doctors face that are too often connected to
racial discrimination.
Additionally, I had heard the story of persevering
through medical school, but feeling and seeing the
challenges through Tweedy’s eyes in Black Man in a
White Coat are the closest I have come to understanding
the complexity of medical school and the American
healthcare system for Black people. Tweedy writes that
though he “had never seen any examples of a doctor’s
racial bias inflicting medical harm, . . . the scientific
literature was flooded with articles on the subject.”
From 1996 to 2002 (the literature he cites), “a plethora
of studies described racially disparate treatments and
outcomes.”
When I listened to his speech during the program, I was
barely fazed by his discussions on health disparities in
the Black community that went untreated and his
exposure to racial discrimination. Because I was
surrounded by my minority peers, I felt confident.
“I’m ready for this,” I thought to myself, as I listened to
him speak.
But when I read his recollection of getting mistaken for a
maintenance technician by Dr. Gale, one of his medical
school professors, I felt the anger, confusion, loneliness,
and betrayal that Tweedy felt.
A Reflection and A Review of Black Man in a White Coat by Damon Tweedy
7
“Tweedy concludes the book with a powerful
message. He stresses that the delivery of quality
patient care should not depend on the race of a
patient or a doctor.”
During his first year in medical school, Tweedy was
asked by Dr. Gale, “‘Are you here to fix the lights? . . .
You can see how dim it is over on that side of the room.
. . . I called about this last week.’”
Dr. Gale did not recognize Tweedy as one of his
students. Humor, writes Tweedy, became the medicine
that he and his Black classmates used to temporarily
sooth the pain of racial insults. Even more disheartening
is Tweedy’s discussions on white patients like Chester
who did not want a “n— doctor” to care for him.
Tweedy concludes the book with a powerful message.
He stresses that the delivery of quality patient care
should not depend on the race of a patient or a doctor.
This message embodies what SMDEP is about, which is
embracing diversity.
Tweedy’s writing is clear, and his stories are real, so
clear and so real that I felt like I was right there with
him. At other times, I felt like I was reliving some of my
own encounters with patients. His lessons are so open-
ended that they gave me an opportunity to engage in
introspection about my own positions as a minority
firefighter and emergency medical technician.
Black Man in a White Coat has given me a new
perspective on how racism, patient care, and racial
diversity should be addressed. While, as a medical
student, Tweedy did not challenge people whom he
perceived as racist, I believe his book has given me the
knowledge and courage to question what I perceive as
unethical behavior in healthcare settings.
I learned a lot from the author and the speaker. Tweedy
introduced me to some of the struggles that today’s
minority students might face in medical school and in
the healthcare system, challenges that I took lightly
during his verbal conversations with me and my peers.
Though sometimes depressing, Tweedy’s narrative is
hopeful and honest.
If I meet Dr. Tweedy again, I will thank him for taking
the time to articulate his honesty and his views on
difficult subjects such as racism and persistent health
disparities in the Black community. I will also thank him
for capturing my attention during my reading of Black
Man in a White Coat.
A Reflection and A Review (continued from page 7)
8
Duke University Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute Multicultural Resource Center, DUSOM
Sharon W. Coward, M.A. Program Coordinator, Multicultural Resource Center
Program Coordinator, Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute
Maureen D. Cullins, A.M. Co-Director, Multicultural Resource Center
Associate Director, Master of Biomedical Sciences Program Program Director, Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute
Delbert R. Wigfall, M.D. Professor of Medicine, Pediatric Cardiology
Associate Dean, Medical Education Co-Director, Multicultural Resource Center
Academic and Clinical Coordinator, Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute
Brenda E. Armstrong, M.D. Professor of Medicine, Pediatric Cardiology
Associate Dean, Admissions Principal Investigator, Summer Biomedical Sciences Institute
WiMEzine
Contact: Shirley E. Faulkner-Springfield, Ph.D.
Editor, WiMEzine
E-Mail: [email protected]
Motto: Who are You?
Writing in Medical Education Faculty and Staff
Shirley E. Faulkner-Springfield, Ph.D.
Writing Program Coordinator, 2013-present Instructor, 2007-present
Matthew Spencer, M.A.T.
Teaching Assistant, 2007-present
Whitney Wingate, M.A. Teaching Assistant, 2015-2016
Joan Nambuba, M.B.S.
Teaching Assistant, 2016
Education as the Practice of Freedom
To educate as the practice of freedom is a way of teaching that anyone can learn. That learning process comes easiest to those of us who teach who also believe that there is an aspect of our vocation that is sacred; who believe that our work is not merely to share information but to share in the intellectual and spiritual growth of our students. To teach in a manner that respects and cares for the souls of our students is essential if we are to provide the necessary conditions where learning can most deeply and intimately begin. . . . Learning is a place where paradise can be created. ~bell hooks, 1994