Upload
philip-cain
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Debris Disks,Small Bodies,and Planets
Alexander V. Krivov
Astrophysical Instituteand University Observatory
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Components of a “mature” planetary system
1. Debris disks stem from small bodies2. Debris disks are sculptured by planets – directly and via small bodies3. Debris disks are easier to observe than planets and small bodies
=> important!
Planetesimals
Planets
Debris diskStar
Circumstellar material
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Outline
●New observations●Debris disks themselves●Debris disks and small bodies●Debris disks, small bodies and
planets●Summary
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Vega
“The Big Four“ ( Lyr, Pic, Eri, PsA) revisited
Holland et al.,Nature 392, 788 (1998)
Su et al., ApJ 628, 427 (2005)Spitzer / MIPS: huge (1000AU) featureless disk seen pole-on
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Eridani
“The Big Four“ ( Lyr, Pic, Eri, PsA) revisited
Greaves et al.,ApJ 619, L187 (2005)
JCMT / SCUBA five years after discovery:signs of rotation, at least three features real
Greaves et al.,ApJ 506, L133 (1998)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Pic
“The Big Four“ ( Lyr, Pic, Eri, PsA) revisited
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Galland et al.,AAp 447, 355 (2006)
New radial velocity constraints onpresumed planets: no Jupiter inside 1AU
Wahhaj et al. (2003)Weinberger et al. (2003)Telesco et al. (2005)
New images of the inner disk (<100AU)
AU Mic
New disks resolved (vis, IR, sub-mm)
Kalas et al. Science 303, 1990 (2004)Liu, Science 305, 1442 (2004)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
M1Ve0.5 Msun
0.1 Lsun
~20 Myr9.9 pc
vis and NIR,88” U. Hawaiiand Keck
Coeval with Pic, but an M-type star
HD 32297
Greaves et al., MNRAS 351, L54 (2004)
Schneider et al., ApJ 629, L117 (2005)Kalas, ApJ, 633, L169 (2005)
Cet
New disks resolved (vis, IR, sub-mm)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
A030 Myr?110 pc
vis and NIR,NICMOS and88” U. Hawaii
G8V, ~10 Gyr, 3.7 pcsub-mm, JCMT / SCUBA
Older than the Sun!
More than 300 disks in total
Meyer et al., ApJS 154, 422 (2004)
Many more unresolved disks (IR excesses)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Greaves, Science 307, 68 (2005)
Statistics: age dependence
Protoplanetary disks
Transitional disks
Debris disks
Large drop after 10Myr
No change after 400Myr, a linear decay instead (cf. Habing et al., Nature 401, 456 ,1999)
No obvious dependence on central star's properties
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Statistics: stars with disks vs stars with planets
...but (almost) no stars with RV planets have debris disks
Greaves et al., MNRAS 348, 1097 (2004)
Nearly all stars with debrisdisks have distant planets
Saffe & Gomes (2004) and Beichman et al (2005) came to different conclusions. The question remains open...
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Dust sources:● planetesimals (collisions)● comets (activity) ● grain-grain collisions
Dust sinks:● sublimation● collisions and RP blowout● ejection by planets
Dust evolution:● Stellar gravity● Direct radiation pressure● Poynting-Robertson drag● Grain-grain collisions● Gas drag ● Gravity of planets● Lorentz force
Birth, life, and death of dust grains
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Direct radiation pressure only “reduces” the mass of the star,dust grain orbits remain Keplerian
Stellar gravity + radiation pressure
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Talks by Gerhard Wurm & Oliver Krauss
Stellar gravity + radiation pressure
●-meteoroids (in bound, elliptic orbits)●two types of -meteoroids (in unbound, hyperbolic orbits)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Stellar gravity + radiation pressure
A typical boundary between - and -meteoroids: 1-10 m
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
● Orbits of -meteoroids shrink and circularize● The grains eventually sublimate near the star
Wyatt & Whipple, ApJ 111, 134 (1950)Breiter & Jackson, MNRAS 299, 237 (1998)
Poynting-Robertson drag
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Collisions
Collisional grinding: pebbles ... sand ... fine dust...
Rates
Min relative velocity for fragmentation: ~100m/sRandom velocities in a disk: ~1km/s => collisions are disruptive
Largest fragment's mass / collider's mass(assuming 1km/s relative velocity): ~10-3
=> pounding is efficient
Outcomes
Collisional time ~ orbital period 10 optical depth
~ 10-1000 orbital periods
=> collisions are frequent
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poynting-Robertson drag vs collisions
Zodiacal cloud Pictoris
Krivov, Mann & Krivova, AAp 362, 1127 (2000)Leinert & Grün, In Phys.of Inner Heliosphere (1990)
Except in old dilute disks, P-R drag plays a minor role!
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Contradictory observations of Pic and AU Mic (12Myr):much gas (gas:dust ~ 100:1) Thi et al. (2001), Brandeker et al. (2004),...
little gas (gas:dust < 6:1) Lecavelier et al. (2001), Roberge et al. (2005),...
Dynamical arguments:very little gas (gas:dust < 1:1) Thebault & Augereau, AAp 437, 141 (2005)
Consequences:gas planets must already have formed there,and there is evidence for that (e.g., Mouillet et al. 1997, Liu 2004)
Gas drag
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Talk by Inga Kamp
Size distribution (the Vega disk example)
Dohnanyi's (1969) power law(alpha-meteoroids only)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Torsten Löhne
beta-meteoroids
Size distribution (the Vega disk example)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Torsten Löhne
...timescales depend on distance...
Size distribution (the Vega disk example)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Torsten Löhne
Size distribution (the Vega disk example)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Torsten Löhne
Dominant size, waviness, presence of -meteoroids
The steady state distribution
Size distribution (the Vega disk example)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
There is an upper limit on the radial slope
Radial distribution (the Vega disk example)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
The steady state distribution
Short-term evolution of debris disk
Supercollision
Dust clump
Longitudinal spreadand formationof a dust ring
Radial spread outwardin ~0.1-1 Myr
Non-steady-state: e.g. due to recent major collisions (Wyatt & Dent, MNRAS 334, 589, 2002; Kenyon & Bromley, AJ 130, 269, 2005)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Torsten Löhne
Long-term evolution of debris disk
Collisional depletion of parent bodies (Dominik & Decin, ApJ 598, 626, 2003)
EKB
Krivov, Sremcevic & Spahn, Icarus 174, 105, (2005)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Long-term evolution of debris disk
A nearly 1/ t decay of parent body populations should causegradual depletion of debris disks over Gyr-scales
Collisional depletion of parent bodies (Dominik & Decin, ApJ 598, 626, 2003)
Krivov, Löhne & Sremcevic, AAp (submitted)
EKB
Krivov, Sremcevic & Spahn, Icarus (2005)
Vega disk
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Global structure – asymmetries and warps
Observed in several resolved disks
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
warp is spreading outwards (Mouillet et al., AAp (1997):
Rwarp
=Rwarp
(Mstar
, Mplanet
, aplanet
, time)
Offset (e, Warp (i,
Global structure – asymmetries and warps
Suggested explanation: secular perturbations from an embedded planet
(alternatively, asymmetry can stem from the disk-ISM interaction)Artymowicz & Clampin, ApJ (1997)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Radial substructure - inner gaps
Seen in resolved disks Inferred from SEDs
Moro-Martin, Wolf & Malhotra, ApJ 621, 1079 (2005)
Curves: w/o planets, grey bands: with planets
Inner gaps with radii of a few to a few tens of AU are found to be typical
Greaves et al.,ApJ 506, L133 (1998)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Talk by Sebastian Wolf
Both scenarios look plausible,both require a planet to confine the planetesimal belt
Radial substructure - inner gaps
Scenario I:●Dust production in a planetesimal belt●P-R drift of dust inward to planet orbit●Planet acts as a dynamical barrier
Scenario II (simpler, robuster!)●Dust production in a planetesimal belt●Subsequent collisional cascade●RP spreads dust outward from the belt
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Spatially-resolved spectrophotometry:evidence for several rings
of fine dust
Okamoto et al., Nature 431, 660 (2004)
Radial substructure - rings
Wahhaj et al. (2003)Weinberger et al. (2003)Telesco et al. (2005)
Images: evidence for several rings
of large dust
Observed in several resolved disks
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Florian Freistetter
Both scenarios look plausible
Radial substructure - rings
Scenario I:●Dust production “somewhere” outside●P-R drift of dust inward to resonances●Ring formation almost at planet orbit
Scenario II (simpler, robuster!)●Dust production in a planetesimal belt●Therefore, higher dust density there●Ring appears at the belt location
Dermott et al, Nature 369, 719 (1994)
A simple kinetic model: localized dust production,
P-R drag and collisionsWyatt, AAp 433, 1007 (2005)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Liou et al. (2000):~1M
J, a
p=40AU, e
p=0.01
Ozernoy et al. (2000):0.2M
J, a
p=55-65AU, e
p=0
Quillen & Thorndike (2002):0.1M
J, a
p=42AU, e
p=0.3
Deller & Maddison (2005):the same + 2nd planet @ 10-18 AU
Eridani
Azimuthal substructure - clumps
Greaves et al.,ApJ 506, L133 (1998)
Quillen & Thorndike,ApJ 578, L149 (2002)
Observations Models
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Martina Queck
Edgeworth-Kuiper belt
Azimuthal substructure - clumps
Observations Models
...none ...
Liou & Zook, AJ 118, 580 (1999)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Theory(trapping efficiency, timescales etc)
(Beauge, Ferraz-Mello, Jackson, Lazzaro, Liou,Roques, Scholl, Sicardy,Weidenschilling, ... (1990s)
Star Planet
Voids
Clumps
Inner gap
Standard scenario: P-R drift & trapping in exterior MMRs
Azimuthal substructure - clumps
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Difficulties with this scenario
Azimuthal substructure - clumps
P-R timescale and timescale of resonant eccentricity pumping>> timescale of collisional destruction !
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Azimuthal substructure - clumps
Works only in disks with > 10-5!
Krivov, Queck & Sremcevic, in prep.
Standard scenario:●Dust production in a planetesimal belt●P-R drift of dust inward to resonances●Capture and formation of clumps
Wyatt, ApJ 598, 1321 (2003)
Alternative scenario:●Dust production in a family of resonant planetesimals●Dust remains in the same resonance
Works always (but requires~0.1-1 Mearth in planetesimals)
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Poster by Martina Queck
Debris disks are:
• a natural component of planetary systems at later evolutionary stages, and therefore important objects to study;
• maintained by, and deliver information on, small body populations;
• indicators of planets;
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006
Studies of debris disks complete the census of planetary systems and can certainly contribute to
answering the great question:“How do the planetary systems form
and evolve?”
4th Planet Formation Workshop Heidelberg, 1-3 March 2006