David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CF Overview & Status

•Design Status

•CMGC Status

•Latest VE Decisions

•CF Total Estimated Cost

•Beneficial Occupancy Dates

•CF Organization

•Summary

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Design Status

√ Title I - completed May 04

√ Interim services by JE between Title I/Title II – completed at the start of Title II

√ Final Tunneling Memorandum and Geotechnical Investigation Report completed Jan 05

√ Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) awarded April 05 to HatchMott MacDonald

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Design Status – cont’d

√ Title II AE Design Kickoff March 29-30√ 30% design review was performed in Aug-Sept 05

Meeting was held at JE Cypress facility to review sum total of <1,000 comments from the various disciplines

100% civil design delivered Oct 26, 05Road-work for North Access Road/Survey Tower Road

Open excavation at EBD/FEE/NEH

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Design Status – cont’d

60% design review scheduled for Oct 28 (will likely be delayed ~ 3 weeks as a result of recent VE decisions)

100% design review Jan 18, 05

Progress drawings for design reviews are available at http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/cf/

When performing design reviews…A commitment for a timely review and response back to JE is necessary

system mgrs

citizen committees

various groups and departments, i.e. CEF, ES&H, SU

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Design Status – cont’d

30% construction cost estimate delivered by JE Oct 4, 05 ($74.3M)

Title I Estimate $50.2MDCN process was followed for all design changes to include estimated hard cost

Valued at ~$3.5M

30% independent cost estimate delivered by WDWC Oct 7, 05 ($66.4M)

Title I Estimate $72M

Reconciliation report needs to be completed

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CMGC Status

Approved!SO DOEChicago DOEWashington DOE

Awarded to Turner Construction (TC) Oct 17, 05

Phase I - $.6MPhase II - $12MIncentive Fee - $.55M

Safety Schedule

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 EffortPhase 1 – preconstruction activities to include:

Provide effective overlap period and oversight of effort during Title IIEstimates during Title II CPM ScheduleIdentify lead-time for critical itemsDesign coordination

Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews

Site investigation

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d

Develop construction bid packagesDevelop list and contact potential biddersDevelop prequalification criteriaSolicit bidsRecommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractorAward contract to subcontractors

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d

Develop Project Management Plan (PMP)Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish projectProject Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safetyProcurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractorsQuality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CM/GC Phase 2 EffortPhase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the Project

All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CMGC Status – cont’d

Held Kick-off meeting Oct 19, 05Delivered cost estimates from both JE and WDWCAE Design scheduleOther data was relayed i.e. weekly Owner/Architect/Contractor (OAC) meetings, etcCritical message

Safety First!Cost estimate for CLOC Construction sequencing, particularly the demolition of FFTBCivil work

North Access RoadOpen cut

Schedule of preparation of procurement packages for constructionRemaining Phase II work

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

JE Est

WDWC Est

Cost Estimates

Largest variance!

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI

Title I Est $50M

Title II Est $74.4M

Variance $24.1M↑

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI

Mechanical $8M (TI) vs $13.4M (TII) delta of $5.4M↑

Site-work $4.2M (TI) vs $7.4 (TII) delta of $3.2M↑

Electrical $5.8M (TI) vs $12.8 (TII) delta of $7M↑

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Title II JE Cost Summary by Area

Areas with most significant increase:

•UH $4.3M →$10.9M •NEH $6.4M →$9.6M•CUP $395K →$2.8M•XRT $3.8M →$5.7M•FEH $6M →$10.7M•CLOC $12.9M →$21.3M

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Title II Breakdown by Structure (with Area)

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Cost Estimate

Delta results in reduction in scope of various items

To date $11M worth of scope has been reduced

Total value of items continue to fall short of remaining in the box by ~$3.6M

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

VE Scope Reductions - Tunneling

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

•T2 – shorten xrt 60’ and access tunnel 40’

•T3a – enlarge access tunnel to 19’

•T5a/b – square off transition tunnel, shift FEH 60’ to the west (T2)

•T6 – cut/cover FEH (not approved)

XRT/FEH Tunnel Floor Plan

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Architectural, Site, Finishes

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

A01 – Delete masonry veneer

NEH – Service Yard Entrance

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

A15 – Reduce glazing

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

A07 – 3rd floor shell only, no interior build out

CLOC Floor Plan 3rd Floor

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

A12 – Eliminate Conf Ctr

Conf Center Floor Plan

Conf Center Elevation

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

G08 – use pan form concrete

NEH Cross Section

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

G10 – reduce size of basement level shaft

NEH Floor Plan – Basement Level

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

S06 – replace screen wall at CUP service yard w/ 8’ mesh fence

Site Plan

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

S03 – reduce excavated bowl

S04 – reduce retaining walls

Site Plan - CLOC

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Mechanical Scope Reductions

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

M13 – place baseline UH design with alt plan

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Electrical Scope Reductions

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Electrical Scope Reductions – cont’d

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Summary of Scope Reductions

Tunneling - $.847M

Architectural, Structural, General - $4.484M

Mechanical - $3.782M

Electrical - $1.762M

Running Total = ~$11MAll cost reductions have been approved by Systems Managers and Project Office.

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

BTH

UNDULATOR HALL

ELECTRON BEAM DUMP & FEE

NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL AND CENTRAL LABS & OFFICE

X-RAY TRANSPORT & DIAGNOSTICS TUNNEL

FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL (redesign)

LCLS CF RenderingAt grade in RSY

Cut & Cover

Location ofPep Ring Rd

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

19% 4%

77%1.9.1 System Management & Integration

1.9.2 Title 1 & Title 2 Conventional Facilities

1.9.3 Construction-T3 Conventional Facilities

CF Cost Estimate – Aug 05

Total CF Cost = $80.6M

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Beneficial Occupancy Dates (L3 and L4)

Sector 20

3/31/06

MMF

4/3/06

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

CF Staff FY 06-08

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

SummaryOpen Issues…

Prepare for upcoming Lehman visit on Nov 17, 05Demonstrate readiness for CD-3 Review (7-9 February 2006)Title II 60% design review coming shortly (?)Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) in process, due in parallel with design by outside separate consultantIndependent Seismic Peer Reviewer on-board and working with JE (Forell/Elsesser Engineers, Inc.)S20 and MMF to complete construction in the next 120 calendar days by XL Construction

Changes will delay BO date

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

Summary – cont’dTurner Construction (TC) to begin full steam ahead

Conduct cost estimate and major planning, conduct VE and constructability reviews, project schedule and develop bid packagesPossible advancement Phase II effort

RSY North Access Road [1]Memo was sent SSO requesting approval to commence this activity

Open-cut of NEH area [1] ?Utility investigation?

Title III Construction for RSY – CLOC by TC (03/06)MEP Technical Review will be required within the next 4 weeksResolution to additional near future de-scope items

David Saenz

FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity saenzd@slac.stanford.edu

Oct 27, 2005

End of presentation