14
David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Strategies for Responding to Supplier PowerStrategies for Responding to Supplier Power

MANEC 387

Economics of Strategy

MANEC 387

Economics of Strategy

David J. BryceDavid J. Bryce

Page 2: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Summary of Last Few SessionsSummary of Last Few Sessions

• Suppliers have power relative to buyers when supply curves are steep or inelastic

• Supply curves tend to be steep when relatively few suppliers are in the market or when they offer differentiated or specialized products. This limits flexibility in the buying firm’s cost structure—forcing its own market prices higher.

• A decrease (increase) in the price of inputs (supply) will lower a firm’s cost leading to enhanced (decreased) competitiveness for the firm

• Thus, when suppliers wield power over the firm, the firm may be at a disadvantage in its own markets

• Suppliers have power relative to buyers when supply curves are steep or inelastic

• Supply curves tend to be steep when relatively few suppliers are in the market or when they offer differentiated or specialized products. This limits flexibility in the buying firm’s cost structure—forcing its own market prices higher.

• A decrease (increase) in the price of inputs (supply) will lower a firm’s cost leading to enhanced (decreased) competitiveness for the firm

• Thus, when suppliers wield power over the firm, the firm may be at a disadvantage in its own markets

Page 3: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

What can be done to neutralize the bargaining power of suppliers?

What can be done to neutralize the bargaining power of suppliers?

1. Buy or ally with a supplier, or develop exclusive sourcing arrangements with them to assure access to the factor at the lowest possible cost, greatest value

2. Develop alternative sources of supply

3. Narrow the sell options of the supplier through market consolidation, merger or alliances

4. Innovate to change the specific nature of inputs and thus neutralize the power of specific suppliers

5. Diversify product base to diminish dependence of your business on any particular supplier

1. Buy or ally with a supplier, or develop exclusive sourcing arrangements with them to assure access to the factor at the lowest possible cost, greatest value

2. Develop alternative sources of supply

3. Narrow the sell options of the supplier through market consolidation, merger or alliances

4. Innovate to change the specific nature of inputs and thus neutralize the power of specific suppliers

5. Diversify product base to diminish dependence of your business on any particular supplier

Page 4: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

1. Buy a supplier or alliance1. Buy a supplier or alliance

• The buyer merges with the supplier– Reduces supply price risk

– Reduces risk that a competitor will tie up the supply through a similar acquisition

– Also called “vertical integration”

• An alternative approach is to pursue a “cooperative strategy” of forming a mutually beneficial alliance

• The buyer merges with the supplier– Reduces supply price risk

– Reduces risk that a competitor will tie up the supply through a similar acquisition

– Also called “vertical integration”

• An alternative approach is to pursue a “cooperative strategy” of forming a mutually beneficial alliance

Page 5: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Example: Vertical Integration or Cooperative AllianceExample: Vertical Integration or Cooperative Alliance

• IBM launches a semiconductor unit for memory manufacture to assure supply to its new IBM PC in the 80s

• Chrysler launches a supplier partnership program for critical parts

– Chrysler engineers and supplier engineers design parts for specific car models

– Chrysler promises business for the life of the automobile model

• IBM launches a semiconductor unit for memory manufacture to assure supply to its new IBM PC in the 80s

• Chrysler launches a supplier partnership program for critical parts

– Chrysler engineers and supplier engineers design parts for specific car models

– Chrysler promises business for the life of the automobile model

Page 6: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

2. Develop alternative sources of supply2. Develop alternative sources of supply

• When the number of sources of supply is low, suppliers’ demand curve is inelastic and they have pricing power

• One response is to actively seek alternative sources of supply by investing in new sources, or

• Pay some other firm to enter the supply market

• When the number of sources of supply is low, suppliers’ demand curve is inelastic and they have pricing power

• One response is to actively seek alternative sources of supply by investing in new sources, or

• Pay some other firm to enter the supply market

Page 7: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Example: Alternative SourcesExample: Alternative Sources

• Nutrasweet– Had a monopoly in the supply of aspartame, the

artificial sweetener in many cola drinks

– Charged Coca-Cola a premium price of $90 per pound

– Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) contemplated entering the market

– Coke should have been willing to subsidize HSC’s entry to effectively create competition in its own supply market

• Cubic Zirconia are an alternative to diamonds for buyers of jewelry and reduces collective dependence on the diamond monopoly

• Nutrasweet– Had a monopoly in the supply of aspartame, the

artificial sweetener in many cola drinks

– Charged Coca-Cola a premium price of $90 per pound

– Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) contemplated entering the market

– Coke should have been willing to subsidize HSC’s entry to effectively create competition in its own supply market

• Cubic Zirconia are an alternative to diamonds for buyers of jewelry and reduces collective dependence on the diamond monopoly

Page 8: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

3. Narrow the sell options of supplier3. Narrow the sell options of supplier

• When a particular buyer accounts for only a small portion of a supplier’s business, the supplier has relative power

• To respond, the buyer can merge with other buyers, or ally by forming a purchasing coalition or other joint arrangement

• When a particular buyer accounts for only a small portion of a supplier’s business, the supplier has relative power

• To respond, the buyer can merge with other buyers, or ally by forming a purchasing coalition or other joint arrangement

Page 9: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Example: Narrow Sell OptionsExample: Narrow Sell Options

• Provider health market: – Large, self-insured employers and insurance

companies are the “suppliers” of lives who need healthcare; Hospitals are the buyers

– Employers were extracting price concessions from hospitals and physicians in regional areas where many health delivery options existed;

– With large numbers of lives, employers and insurers had the power

• Solution?– Merge the hospitals and physicians in a local area into

a health system with a single point of negotiation with “suppliers”; The employers must negotiate with the health system or risk having no healthcare for their covered lives

• Provider health market: – Large, self-insured employers and insurance

companies are the “suppliers” of lives who need healthcare; Hospitals are the buyers

– Employers were extracting price concessions from hospitals and physicians in regional areas where many health delivery options existed;

– With large numbers of lives, employers and insurers had the power

• Solution?– Merge the hospitals and physicians in a local area into

a health system with a single point of negotiation with “suppliers”; The employers must negotiate with the health system or risk having no healthcare for their covered lives

Page 10: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Other ExamplesOther Examples

• GPOs (Group Purchasing Organizations) emerged as purchasing organizations for member hospitals to gain power relative to medical suppliers (gauzes, bandages, other hospital supplies)

• Others?

• GPOs (Group Purchasing Organizations) emerged as purchasing organizations for member hospitals to gain power relative to medical suppliers (gauzes, bandages, other hospital supplies)

• Others?

Page 11: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

4. Innovate4. Innovate

• If a powerful supplier controls an important factor input, the firm may need to “design-out” its dependence on that particular factor

• This may be difficult, especially if the input is a basic material, like fine chemicals, certain precious ores, etc.—try one of the other techniques

• If a powerful supplier controls an important factor input, the firm may need to “design-out” its dependence on that particular factor

• This may be difficult, especially if the input is a basic material, like fine chemicals, certain precious ores, etc.—try one of the other techniques

Page 12: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Example: InnovateExample: Innovate

• Many manufacturers reduced dependence on Intel chip architecture in the late 80s by redesigning products compatible with Motorola, or RISC chips; e.g. computer controls for automobiles (Ford)

• Many manufacturers reduced dependence on Intel chip architecture in the late 80s by redesigning products compatible with Motorola, or RISC chips; e.g. computer controls for automobiles (Ford)

Page 13: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

5. Diversify product base5. Diversify product base• Assume a single supplier controls a

significant portion of the input value of a firm’s single product

• Then by diversifying into additional products, the firm reduces dependence on that supplier

• This response may be used to achieve a number of different objectives; it is only infrequently used to curtail a powerful supplier—try one of the other techniques first

• Assume a single supplier controls a significant portion of the input value of a firm’s single product

• Then by diversifying into additional products, the firm reduces dependence on that supplier

• This response may be used to achieve a number of different objectives; it is only infrequently used to curtail a powerful supplier—try one of the other techniques first

Page 14: David J. Bryce © 2002 Strategies for Responding to Supplier Power MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce

David J. Bryce © 2002David J. Bryce © 2002

Example: Product DiversificationExample: Product Diversification

• Citizen Watch company became less dependent on core suppliers when it diversified out of watches into printers, disk drives, liquid crystal displays and computers. (Leveraged its competency of manufacturing small, high tech mechanical parts)

• Citizen Watch company became less dependent on core suppliers when it diversified out of watches into printers, disk drives, liquid crystal displays and computers. (Leveraged its competency of manufacturing small, high tech mechanical parts)