Upload
srini-kalyanaraman
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
1/93
Date of the Mah@bh@rata War
using planetarium software
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
August 29, 2014
Authored by: Narahari Achar
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
2/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 1
B. N. Narahari Achar about 24000 wordsProfessor Emeritus
University of Memphis
Memphis, TN 38119
THE DATE OF THE MAHABHARATA WAR USING PLANETARIUM SOFTWARE
by
B. N. Narahari Achar
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
3/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ma
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
4/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 3
8.2f Pair of eclipses within thirteen days .. 73
8.3 Date of$=a 758.4 Conjunction of"aniwith rohi#................................................ 76
Chapter 9. Various dates for the War and Simulations with Planetarium software. 77
Chapter 10. Epilogue.. 85
Acknowledgements 87Bibliography.. 89
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
5/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 4
MANGALAM
!"#$!%
&'( ) *+ #,!-&-+ # .!%
/ 0$ /0$ !
# +123! 4 # 5 %
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
6/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 5
CHAPTER 1 PROLOGUE
The first presentation of determining the Date of the Mahabharata War using Planetarium
software was made thirteen years ago in 2001 at the International Conference in Montreal. The
software could project the view of the sky at any time at any place. At that time the software did
not have search capabilities. Yet the software could be used to discriminate and select from a
plethora of dates from about 4700 BCE to 400 CE for a possible date of the war. A set of
astronomical data from Udyoga Parvanwere chosen as benchmark data and if they could be
reproduced on a given date proposed by a scholar, that date could be considered a candidate and
rejected if the data were not reproduced. Four works by the following scholars, with the dates
proposed by them in parentheses were chosen for this purpose: Kochhar (955 BCE), Sidharth
(1131 BCE), Sengupta (2449 BCE) and Raghavan (3067 BCE). It was shown that the benchmark
data could be reproduced only for Raghavans date and no other. A few more random checks
with dates other than the four chosen also yielded negative results. It was proposed that 3067
BCE could be considered as the date of the war.
Subsequent work has shown that the astronomical information inBh&!aparvan(which has
been severely criticized by all scholars) can be interpreted in a consistent manner provided most
of the astronomical references corresponded to comets and not planets and that a unique date of
3067 BCE for the war results. These results were presented at the seminar on the date of the
Mahabharata war held at the Mythic Society in Bangalore in 2003.
This work is based on the astronomical information found in the epic itself and does not depend
on any other outside information. It uses the concepts of abhidh@/ lak&a#@ and vya0janato
properly understand the meanings of words such asgrahaand in so doing it is shown that theastronomical references are consistent and not contradictory as was alleged previously. A unique
date is derived as the date of the war and there are given copious illustrations of star maps
generated by the planetarium software. Many criticisms that have been hurled at this work have
been shown to be of not much significance.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
7/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 6
CHAPTER 2 ASTRONOMICAL KNOWLEDGE OF ANCIENT INDIA
The purpose of this chapter is to introduce some basic concepts of astronomy used in India from
the Vedic times and relate them to modern notions in using the planetarium software.
2.1The Celestial Sphere
Our experience of Time arises from three fundamental motions in Nature: the rotation of the
Earth on its axis, the revolution of the Moon around the Earth and the revolution of the Earth
around the Sun. These motions give us the units of Time, the Day, the Month and the Year,
respectively. Moreover, the axis of rotation of the Earth is inclined at an angle of 23and
degrees with respect to the perpendicular to the plane of the Earths orbit around the Sun. As a
result of this inclination, as the Earth goes around the Sun, there is a variation of the length of
day time during the year resulting in Seasons. Special mention may be made of the two
Equinoxes, the Spring and Autumnal equinoxes, when the day and night are of exactly equal
duration and the Summer and the Winter solstices when the duration of day time is the longest
and the shortest respectively. Furthermore, the Sun rises exactly in the East on the Spring
equinox. The point of sunrise continuously shifts towards North until the Summer solstice and
then begins to shift southwards. The length of day time continuously increases and on the
Summer solstice, it is the longest day. The point of sunrise begins to move southwards, with the
concomitant decrease in the length of day time. When it is Autumnal equinox, the Sun rises
exactly in the East again and the day and night are of equal duration. The point of sunrise
continues to move southwards, the length of day time continues to decrease until it is Winter
solstice. It is the shortest day and the Sun The ancient =&is had observed all these and their
observations were based on the Earth. So the Earth appeared to be stationary, all the heavenly
objects executed a daily or Diurnal motion, i.e., they rose in the East, moved across the sky andset in the West. In addition, the Sun appears to go round the Earth completing the path in one
year. So does the Moon, completing its path around the Earth in a month. These astronomical
phenomena are best understood in terms of the Celestial Sphere1representation.
1Standard textbooks on Astronomy deal with this material. See for example
E. Chaisson and S. McMillan,Astronomy Today,Prentice Hall, Engle wood NJ, 1993
M. A. Seeds, Foundations of Astronomy, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 1992
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
8/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 7
In this picture the Earth is considered to be stationary (i.e., it does not move), The Sun, the Moon
and the Planets go around the Earth. The stars are very far away from the Earth and are
considered to be fixed to definite positions on the inside surface of a very large sphere centered
on the Earth. This large sphere is the Sky we see and is referred to as the Celestial Sphere. The
size of the sphere is unspecified, except that it is very large. All the stars are assumed to be at the
same distance from the Earth and at fixed locations on the inside surface. As the Sun, the Moon
and the planets move around the Earth they also appear to be moving in the Sky in the
background of the stars. A number of lines, circles and points drawn on the Celestial Sphere are
helpful in locating and observing the motions of various heavenly objects.
Imagine a single observer on Earth standing all alone and observing unhindered by earthly
objects such as trees, hills etc. Draw a large circle on the ground with a radius equal to the
distance as far as one could see (Figure 2.1). This horizontal circle is called the Horizon. The
observer O is at the center of this circle. Imagine a large sphere with the Horizon cutting into two
halves. The sphere is the Celestial Sphere. The upper half is the Sky we see, the Horizon
separating the part of the Sky we see from the part we dont. The stars are fixed on this Sphere
and hence their positions can be known by coordinates similar to the Latitude and Longitude weuse on Earth to locate cities, but these coordinates are fixed on the Celestial Sphere and not on
Earth and will be discussed later. When the observer looks above, the point directly overhead is
called the Zenith and the point directly below is called the Nadir. Note that the Earth is very
small compared to the size of the Celestial Sphere and is essentially a point at the center of the
Sphere.
The Earth rotates on its axis from west to east, but for the observer in Figure 1, the entire
Celestial Sphere with all the stars rotates from east to west. The axis of rotation of the Earth
when extended meets the Celestial Sphere at the points P (North Celestial Pole) and S (the South
Celetial Pole). A circle on the Celestial Sphere drawn so as to pass through the points Zenith, P,
Nadir, and S is called the Meridian Circle and it intersects the Horizon at the points N and S. The
Celestial Equator intersects the Horizon at the points E and W. These points indicate the cardinal
directions North, South, East and West.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
9/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 8
Figure 2.1. The Celestial Sphere, Horizon, Meridian Circle, Celestial Equator and the
Cardinal points indicating the directions North, East, South and West
The view of the Celestial Sphere above is called the Local view and its appearance changes from
location to location. In particular the North Celestial pole appears at an altitude (i.e., the angle
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
10/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 9
Figure2. 2. Precession Currently Polaris is on the North Celestial Pole, in 3000 BCE, it was
Thuban.
2.3The Ecliptic
As the earth moves around the Sun, from the Earth the Sun appears to move among the stars.
This is seen in the next picture.
Figure 2. 3. Motion of the earth around the Sun and the apparent motion of the Sun from the
Earth.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
11/93
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
12/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 11
Sun continues to move further South, the days become shorter until he reaches Winter
Solstice(WS), when the Sun is as far South as possible. The Day is the shortest. Then the Sun
turns Northward again. That is the beginning of Uttar@ya#a1The seasons and the variation of
day time are illustrated in the next figure showing the position of the Sun at noon on various
dates. At noon the Sun is on the Meridian Circle, the notation of am and pm for the morning and
afternoon arising from the fact that the Sun is before reaching the meridian, ante meridian , in the
morning. It is post meridian or pm after having crossed the meridian. (Figure 2.5).
Figure 2. 5. Local view of the Sun at various positions along the Ecliptic.
213Nak&atras
The Moon also appears to move among the stars as it revolves around the Earth, the path of the
Moon being another circle on the Celestial Sphere, inclined at an angle of 5 degrees to the
Ecliptic. The Moon completes the orbit on the average in 27.3 days. Thus the Moon travels at
the rate of 13and 1/3 degrees per day. In order to track the motion of the Moon and the Sun on
the Celestial Sphere, the ancient sages chose 27 bright stars along the path as markers and these
are the nak&atras2. Later on at the time of ved@
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
13/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 12
Moon spends about a day at each nak&atra1 Incidentally, when one talks about ones
jan!ank&atra/ one is referring to the fact that on the day of birth, Moon was at that nak&atra1
Each nak&atra is also associated with an adhidevata. A table of the list of 27 nak&atra./ together
with the associated adhidevata and an identification with the modern name3of the bright star
developed by the author4is given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Identification of Vedic nak&atras
Nak&atra-s # of
stars
de!tificatio! of "ri!ci"a star $residi!g
Deity%&%& $rese!t$=ttik@ 6 'au 'au 4gni5ohi# 1 *au *au Praj@pati
M=ga"ir@ + -ri .au/ o!a*rdr@ 1 *-ri e/ 5%dra
P%narva.6 2 .e .e 4ditiP%&ya 1 3&!c 3&!c B=ha.pati*.le&@ 6 5ya 5ya arpaMakh@ 6 *eo *eo Pit=
p-ph@lg%# 2 3eo 3eo 4rya!@%-ph@lg%# 2 .eo .eo Bhaga
7a.ta 7 3&r8 ir/ avit@
8itr@ 1 *ir *ir 9ndrav@t 1 *oo ;ir +@y%+i"@kh@ 2 *ib *ib 9ndr@#
4n6r@dh@ 4 3
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
14/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 13
As can be seen from Table 2.1, the present identifications for six nak&atra-. are different from
those given in the RCRC. That there is misidentification of some of the nak&atra-. has been
pointed out before6. In the RCRC list the identifications for .v@ti/ "rava#a/ and dhani&ha are
30 or more away from the Ecliptic, the identifications in the present work are closer to the
Ecliptic. The present identifications for three others, !=ga"ir@/ @rdr@ and ha.ta are brighter and
nearer to the Ecliptic than the RCRC list.
2.5Nak&atriya praj@pati
The passage in aittirya Br@h!a#a (1.5.2.2) depicts the figure ofPraj@pati constituting
certain nak&atras :
o vai nak&atriya> veda|%bhayorena> lokayorvid%;|ha.ta [email protected] ha.ta;| ?itr@ "ira;
ni&y@ h=daya>| 6r6 vi"@khe |prati&h@n6r@dh@;| e&a vai nak&atriya; praj@pati;|
The figure ofPraj@pati is to be seen in the background of stars as described in the above
passage, The nak&atra ha.ta represents the hand, ?itr@ the head, and ni&y@ (.v@ti) theheart; the dual vi&@kh@s represent his thighs and an6r@dh@ represents his feet. A free-hand
sketch of this figure is shown in the figure 2.6
6Abhya!kar (1991)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
15/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 14
Figure 2.6 Nak&atriya praj@pati
The figure is a classic yoga posture with the folded hands above the head, the nak&atras as
identified in Table 2.1 match the description very well. It also shows that the commonly accepted
identification of Arcturus (alpha Bootes) for .v@ti is to be rejected as it is too far from the
Ecliptic to represent the heart.
2.6ithi
As indicated earlier, the Sun moves along the Ecliptic at the rate of 1 per day and the Moon
moves at the rate of 13 and 1/3 per day. On the a!@[email protected] (New Moon day), the Sun and the
moon are together, i.e., they rise and set at the same time. The next day the Moon is ahead by a
little over 12. The Moon rises about 48 minutes later than the Sun and sets later by the same 48
minutes. The twelve degree separation between the Sun and the Moon is termed atithi1 The first
day it ispratipad/ the next day it is dvityaetc., each day the separation between the Sun and the
Moon is increasing by 12. After 15 days, it isPa%r#i!@/ (The Full Moon), the separation is
180. That is the Sun and the Moon are on opposite sides of the sky, the Moon is rising as the
Sun sets. Figure 2.7 shows the view of the sky on April 29, 2014 which happens to be an
a!@[email protected] Sun and the Moon are together at a.hvini1
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
16/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 15
Figure 2. 7. Sun and the Moon are together on an a!@[email protected]
The nak&atraof the day gives the position of the Moon, tithi gives the position of the Sun
relative to the Moon. Together the tithi and nak&atra (these are two of the five elements of
pa0?@
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
17/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 16
ka&yapa has not been seen by any except, the sagePr@#atr@ta/ son of arga/ who advises the
other sages to go to !ah@!er% from where ka&yapa does not move. Who are the seven suns?
Who is ka&yapa? How can we understand it as the basis for the model of seasons?
There are two motions involved in the phenomenon of seasons. The rotation of the Earth about
its axis, results in the appearance of the sun rising and setting and the phenomena of day and
night. This is described as the motion of the sun around the !er%/ corresponding to the motion
about the pole of the Celestial Equator. The second motion is the revolution of the Earth around
the sun, approximated as a circle, which appears for the observer on earth, as the sun moving
around the Earth. This is described as the sun moving around the !ah@!er%/ the pole of the
Ecliptic. The picture of eight suns is woven in an ingenious way to explain the phenomena of
seasons.
There are six =t%s (seasons) and correspond to different segments of the Ecliptic as the sun
travels along the Ecliptic. Each of the segments of the Ecliptic has a presiding deity, an adhipati/
who is dormant until the sun (the seventh sun who moves along the Ecliptic) is actually in the
segment. The seventh sun then assumes the identity of the lord of the segment and thus
activating him causes the phenomena pertinent to that =t%and then moves to the next segment.The current adhipati becomes dormant again while the next adhipati is activated.
Referring to figure 4, it can be seen that during half the year, the sun moves along the Ecliptic
from VE through SS to AE, the sun is to the north of the Celestial Equator, and during the other
half of the year, the sun stays to the south of the Celestial Equator. From AE to VE we have three
=t%s, each =t% is assigned a segment of the semicircle, the three segments haveBhr@ja/ Paara
and Pata
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
18/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 17
The source of power of this moving sun, @roga;/ and hence of all the other six suns, is ka&yapa/
the eighth sun. The seven suns7get the light from ka&yapa1 o!a makes these suns free of
darkness and pure like a goldsmith making gold shine better with the help of bellows.
The eighth sunka&yapais at the intersection of the axes of the Equator as well as the Ecliptic
(both !er% and !ah@!er%), i.e., inside the Earth! This may be basis for thep%r@#i? story of
.agara and his sons being reduced to ashes by ka&yapa1
=here is !o reaso! to take these se8e! su!sE as .apta grah@sE, as soe schoars see to do he se8e!
su!s are used o!y to ode the seaso!s here is o!y o!e true su! As the su! o8es ao!g the eci"tic, he
assues the ide!tity of o!e of the other siC su!s Bho are the rege!ts of the sege!ts of the eci"tic
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
19/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 18
CHAPTER 3 BACKGROUND
In the opinion of Pusalker8, theMah@bh@rata war is the central landmark in Indian traditional
history and fixing the date of the event will give a starting point for settling dates of events
occurring before and after it. According to tradition, as declared in the epic itself, the war
between the$a%ravas andPandavas took place at the junction ofDv@paraand$ali y%gas9,
around 3000 BCE.Bh@ratya-s never had any doubt about the historicity of the event and have
been celebrating the anniversaries of certain events connected with the epic such as t@jayanti
andBh&!@&a!ifor centuries. However, when Western scholars began to study the epics with
interest from a rationalist historic point of view, doubts were expressed about the war ever
having been a historic event. Some granted that the event was historic, but it was only a family
feud, which was exaggerated to epic proportions and doubted the remoteness of its date.
Western Scholars10
, while acknowledging that unlike other ancient civilizations, the ancient
traditions inBh@rathave been preserved without a break down to the present day, have generally
argued thatBh@ratya- s lack a sense of history and that there is a dearth of historical texts in
Bh@rata, that contain records of dates and events. These scholars have discounted the fact thattwo of the greatest epics of the world, 5@!@y@#a andMah@bh@rataare traditionally regarded as
[email protected] s, i.e., historic texts and that there are in addition, a host of supporting texts in the form of
P%r@#a- s. Ignoring the fact thatBh@rata has its own sense of history and its purpose11, the
scholars have systematically misrepresented the chronology ofBh@rata so as to fit some
misguided theory12
. A plethora of dates for the war derived on the basis of a number of diverse
methodologies and with no consensus, have been proposed. Thus began a cottage industry for
discovering the date of the Mahabharata war. Dozens of conferences have been held and nearly
two hundred research papers and books have been published on the topic of the date of the
Mah@bh@ratawar.
F$usaker (1996)
9antare ?aiva .a>pr@pte kali dv@parayorabh6t
.a!antapa0?ake y%ddha> k%r%p@#:ava .enayo;GGHh 29GG10
asha, A, (197+), The Wonder that was India,ro8e $ress !c, NeB Iork11
dhar!@rtha k@!a !ok&@#@> %pade"a .a!anvita>Gp6rvav=tta> kath@y%kta> [email protected]> pra?ak&ateGG12
the so caed Arya! !8asio! heory or A, !oB thoroughy discredited
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
20/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 19
A number of methodologies based on linguistics, archaeology, astronomy, puranic genealogies
etc., have been employed to determine the date of theMah@bh@rata war, but the results have
been extremely disappointing. A range of dates ranging from about 5500 BCE to 600 BCE have
been proposed for theMah@bh@rata war, most of the Indian scholars prefer the date around 3000
BCE, while most of the Western scholars show a preference for much later dates between 1500
BCE to 1000 BCE. Figure 1 displays the distribution of the number of authors 13and the dates
proposed by them.
Figure 1. Distribution of the Number of authors (vertical axis) and the Dates proposed
(horizontal axis, in BCE years, with +/- 250 BCE years range) based on all
methodologies
Nearly 40% of all the authors base their results on the astronomical references14,15. However, it
has not been possible to arrive at a definite date on the basis of astronomical references either.
Figure 2 shows the distribution of dates from more than forty scholars who have made use of the
astronomical data. It is clear that there is as much variation in the dates based on astronomical
references alone as the dates based on diverse methodologies. Practically every scholar has
1+
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
21/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 20
criticized the astronomical references in the epic as conflicting and self-contradictory, so that no
satisfactory and acceptable result can be obtained from these data16.
A new research tool in the form of Planetarium Software17
became commercially available about
fifteen years ago. These software products can project the view of the sky at any time and place
on the world from about 10000 BCE to about 10000 CE and the research using astronomical
methods was reduced from tedious calculations to just clicking the mouse of a personal
computer. However, the new tool has not brought the results any closer. Three of the most recent
publications, all based on astronomical methods and all using planetarium software have
proposed dates of 5500 BCE18, 1798 BCE19and 1198 BCE20respectively.
Figure 2. Distribution of Number of authors (vertical axis) and the Dates proposed
(along the horizontal axis, in BCE years, range +/- 250 BCE)on the basis of astronomicalreferences
The author pioneered successfully the use of the planetarium software products to study the
astronomical references in the Vedic texts and in the epicMah@bh@rata1The purpose of this
16$usaker (1996)
1=
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
22/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 21
monograph is to present the results of a research program undertaken to determine the date of the
Mah@bh@rata war on the basis of the astronomical references in the epic and their simulation
using the planetarium software. The reason for the wild variation for the date of the war is to be
found in the source statements about the astronomical references and their interpretation. It has
been recognized that the Critical Edition ofMah@bh@rata which was compiled from a variety of
sources painstakingly by a host of scholars under the leadership of Dr. Suktankar should be taken
as the framework for identifying the astronomical references in the text. The proper
interpretation of the word graha depends on the context and it may refer to a planet or a comet.
The planetarium software provides a powerful tool for the exploration. With these points in mind
the monograph sets out to demonstrate that a unique date for theMah@bh@rata war can be
obtained. It will be shown that contrary to the general belief, the astronomical references in the
Bh&!aparvanand Udyogaparvanwhich constitute the astronomical references most pertinent
to the war, form a very consistent set and in the context of omens as indicating impending
calamities, agree closely with the tradition of omens in4tharvavedaand its ari"i&ha-s. The
astronomical references lead to a unique date for the war, 3067 BCE and all other astronomical
references in the epic are consistent with this date. This date had also been proposed earlier byProfessor Raghavan
21and his collaborators. This date forms the sheet-anchor for the chronology
ofBh@rata1
The plan of the monograph is as follows. A brief description of the salient features of the
planetarium software products commercially available will be given in the next chapter. The
limitations of the simulations are also discussed. The following chapter discusses the set of
astronomical references in the Udyogaand theBh&!aparvan-s. The consistency of the
references within theBh&!aparvanis discussed. It is shown that most of the astronomical
references in this set pertain to comets and that the few truly planetary references are identical to
the ones in Udyogaparvan and that these common references lead to the uniquedate of the war.
The consistency of the other astronomical references in the epic is illustrated by star maps
generated by the planetarium software. In the final sections there is a consolidation of the
21%agha8a! (1969)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
23/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 22
traditions ofBh@gavata p%r@#a/ .aptar&i Era, and beginning of$aliy%ga/ and response to
criticisms that have been directed towards this work.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
24/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 23
CHAPTER 4 THE PLANETARIUM SOFTWARE
The term Planetarium Software refers to a collection of computer programs which can
generate and display on the screen of a computer monitor thousands of stars and other heavenly
objects as seen in the sky at any given location and at any given date and time (between 9999
BCE and 9999 CE), all at the touch of a mouse. These software programs draw from the most up
to date star catalogues and are based on the current theories of planetary and stellar phenomena.
They are routinely used for telescopic applications both in manual and computer controlled
modes of operation, for they can project at which part of the sky and what time a desired object
becomes visible in the sky and direct the telescope accordingly. They are also used for satellite
tracking and space exploration applications routinely. Details of such applications are available
in the instruction manuals. Literally hundreds of such programs are available in the market to suit
any need for astronomical applications. There are several popular products commercially
available22
: The Sky, SkyMap Pro, Red Shift, Cybersky, Starry Night etc., for PC applications
and Voyager for Apple McIntosh applications. These software products can also be used as tools
of research in exploring ancient astronomy as has been shown by the author in severalpublications
23. The author has found SkyMap Pro to be most suited for current applications, but
has used Red Shift, Cybersky and occasionally, The Sky as supplementary tools. The author
gratefully acknowledges that many figures that are given in this essay would not have been
possible without the help of these software products. He has also found useful another computer
program24, Pancang2, which can calculate tithiand nak&atrafor any day on the Gregorian
(Julian calendar, for dates between 3000 BCE and 1580 BCE) calendar. This program has been
used only as a check and has not been used for any calculations other than for just verification
purposes.
The simulations provided by the planetarium software are extremely reliable and they are
based on the most recent star catalogues and planetary information. However, some caution has
22here are a!y "a!etariu softBare "roducts !oB coerciay a8aiabe hey are "eriodicay re8ieBed
i! the agaKi!e
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
25/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 24
to be exercised in using these programs to compute eclipses at dates going back several
thousands of years in time. Let us assume that the periods of planets and the moon are known
accurately to six decimal places, say for example. The sixth place is somewhat uncertain. When
the data is extrapolated to 3000 BCE, a time span of 5000 years, some 60000 revolutions of the
Moon would have been considered, but only 200 revolutions of Saturn. The accuracy of the last
decimal place is very important for the Moon, but not for Saturn. Thus in a simulation
corresponding to 3000 BCE, the extrapolated position of Saturn is very reliable, but that of the
Moon is somewhat uncertain. This becomes evident in simulating the exact moment of new
moon, for example. There is a spread of about 12 hours among the times for the New Moon
given by the SkyMap Pro, Redshift and Cybersky. The time given by another software product
The Sky is off by seven days! There are other factors to be considered. This has to do with the
slowing off of Earths rotation. This is small, but results in a correction known as T, but there is
an uncertainty in the estimation of T itself. This introduces an uncertainty of about 12 hours25
in the occurrence of an eclipse when extrapolated to 3000 BCE. This means one cannot calculate
the occurrence of a solar eclipse within an accuracy of several hours. This would in turn cause
the location of a total solar eclipse also uncertain. It should be emphasized here that theoccurrence of the solar eclipse itself is quite certain, but what is uncertain is the exact location
where it occurs. In view of this, it would be difficult to choose a date based solely on the
occurrence of an eclipse at a given location. In the present work therefore, planetary positions
such as that of Saturn are considered most reliable. When it comes to eclipses, it is considered
sufficient if an eclipse occurred, and not much weight is given to the exact location of visibility
as per the simulation. Conversely, those works, which determine the date of the war solely on the
basis of occurrence of a solar eclipse at$%r%k&etrashould be accepted with caution. The
maximum duration of a solar eclipse is only about 7 minutes and the uncertainty runs to several
hours. The extrapolated planetary positions on the other hand, are highly reliable.
27Host rece!t estiatio!s are soe Bhat saer, about 2=7 hours i! +000 &L
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
26/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 25
CHAPTER 5 ASTRONOMICAL REFERENCES IN THE EPIC
It is well known that there are a large number of references to astronomical events, totaling to
more than one hundred and fifty, scattered throughout the epic and have been catalogued26.
Figure 3 shows the distribution of the number of astronomical references (along the vertical axis)
among the eighteenparvan-s of the Epic (along the horizontal axis). Admittedly most of the
references are astrological in nature and the possibility that some of them may be later
interpolations cannot be overruled. However, there must be a few genuine events that were
observed and noted in view of the importance of the war. In fact, the majority of the
astronomical references occur in Udyoga andBh&!a parvan-s, pertaining to events just before
or at the start of the war and will be examined in detail.
Figure 3. Distribution of the Number of astronomical references among the
EighteenParvan.of the Epic. Udyoga(#5) andBh&!a (#6) contain the largestnumber of astronomical references pertaining to the war.
5.1 Astronomical References in Udyoga Parvan
There is a coherent chronology of astronomical events starting with$=as departure for his
diplomatic mission for peace to7a.tin@p%ra before the war and this mission must have been
considered very important for the astronomical references for this event have been recorded in
26
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
27/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 26
great detail. The references quoted here are numbered with (i), (ii),with the appropriate
reference to the verses in the Epic.
(i)$=a leaves for7a.tin@p%raon the diplomatic mission27for peace in the !aitr !%h6rtain
the month of k@rtkaon the day of revatnak&atraC
tato vyapete ta!a.i .6rye vi!ala %dgate
!aitre !%h6rte .a>pr@pte !=dva?i&i div@kare//
ka%!%[email protected] revaty@> "aradante hi!@ga!e
.phta.a.ya.%khe k@le kalya; .atvavat@> vara;// MB(V. 81. 6-7)
Then, when the"arad=t% had ended and he!anta=t% was just beginning, in the month of
k%!%da (k@rtika), on the day of revati nak&atraand in the !aitr!%h6rta/that ever-ready hero
of heroes (set off) in the tender rays of the sun (for7a.tin@p%ra).
It is to be noted that$=a leaves Upaplavya nagarafor7a.tin@p%raon the day of
revati nak&atra in the month of k@rtika1 It means that it is only a couple of days before the full
moon of k@rtika/ which should happen when the moon is near k=ttik@ nak&atra1
(ii) On the way he halts at a place called +=ka.thalaand reaches7a.tin@p%raon the day of
Bhara# nak&atra1That night happens to be the full moon and also a lunar eclipse takes place onthis k@rtikafull moon, which is referred to below by$ar#ain this parvan and again by [email protected] in
his conversation withDh=tar@&train the nextBh&!aparvan1
(iii)$=ameets with various people to discuss the conditions of averting the war. On the day of
p%&ya/ D%ryodhanarejects all offers of peace.
(iv)$=a leaves7a.tin@p%ra,$ar#a accompanies him in his chariot and has a lengthy
conversation with him. At the end of the conversation$=asends a message through$ar#ato
Bh&!a and others that a!@[email protected] on the seventh day hence ($=a leaves7a.tin@pura four
days after the peace talks fail on the day ofp%&ya1 Professor Raghavan infers that it is on the day
of %ttaraph@lg%#1 The tithimust correspond to k=a pak&a a&a!/ the third quarter moon, as
the new moon is to follow in seven days) and that war rituals be started on that day:
.apta!@??@pi diva.@d a!@[email protected]@ bhavi&yati
.angr@!a> yojayettatra t@>hy@h%; "akradevat@>// MB(V. 140. 18)
2=he
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
28/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 27
Seven days from now falls the New Moon day, with9ndraas the Deity for the nak&atraof the
day. (i.e.,'ye&h@ nak&atra). Let the war rituals be started on that day.
This is a very important piece of astronomical reference.$ar#a says there is going to be
a solar eclipse on that day. Thus, there is a sequence of eclipses referred to here, first a lunar
eclipse on the full moon of k@rtikafollowed by a solar eclipse at'ye&h@ nak&atra1During this
conversation$a=#a describes the positions of the planets at that time in the following verses
while talking about the omens foretelling an impending disaster to the k%r%family:
(v) pr@j@patya> hi nak&atra> graha. tko !ah@dy%ti;/
"anai"?ara; p:ayati p:ayan pr@#inodhika>// MB(V.141. 7)
The noxious and much lustrousgrahaSaturn, which always afflicts people severely, is
afflicting the nak&atrapresided bypraj@pati.
(vi)k=tv@ ?@ jye&h@y@> !adh%.6dana/
an6r@dh@> pr@rthayate !aitra> .a>"a!ayanniva// MB(V.141. 8)
Mars has performed a retrograde near Antares, oh, !adh%.6dana/and appears
to be praying for an6r@dh@s friendship, as if to pacify it.
(vii)n6na> !ahadbhaya> k=a k%r6n@> .a!%pa.thita>/vi"e&e#a v@reya ?itr@> p:ayate graha;// MB(V. 141. 9)
Indeed a great danger awaits the k%r% family and is indicated by thegraha afflicting Spica.
(viii) .o!a.ya lak&!a vy@v=tta> r@h%rarka !%pe&yati/ MB(V. 141. 10)
The moon lost its luster and r@h% is approaching the Sun.
Here$ar#adraws attention to the lunar eclipse that had already occurred and a solar
eclipse yet to happen, but makes no reference to the number of days in the interval between the
two eclipses. Apparently there is nothing special about this pair of eclipses. Furthermore, special
attention should be paid to the message of$=a/which is sent toBh&!a,Dro#a, and$=pa/ but
not toD%ryodhana1It is not a declaration of war, which can only be made either by D%rydhana
or %dhi&hirato each other, and certainly not by$=a1Thus there is no reason to assume that
the war started on the a!@[email protected]. Hence, E.a yojayetFcan only refer to the
beginning of war rituals and not the war itself. This will be more discussions on this aspect later.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
29/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 28
5.2 Astronomical References in theBh&!aparvan
As is well known, [email protected] withDh=tar@&traon the eve of the war and describes to
him a whole set of ill omens he has seen. These descriptions of ill omens run over two chapters
in theBh&!aparvan/ and the astronomical references occur in four separate segments:"loka.
(20-23) and"loka (32) in chapter 2, and"loka. (11-17) and"loka. (24-29) in chapter 3. On the
face of it these refer to planetary positions which are obviously contradictory and inconsistent
among themselves and astronomically impossible. This is best illustrated by a table given by
Sengupta28
which shows the positions of the planets as inferred from the references in both
Udyoga andBh&h!a parvan.based on the translation of the wordgraha as planet. Glaring are
the inconsistencies inBh&!a parvanwhen the same planet appears at two different positions in
the same night!
Table 1. Planetary positions near nak&atra. as inferred from the two references
Planet Udyoga parvan Bh&!a parvan
Saturn 5ohi# P6rvaph@lg%# or +i"@kh@Mars 4n6r@dh@ !akh@or rohi#
Sun 'ye&h@ or k=ittik@ 5ohi# or dhani&@
Moon $=ttik@ 'ye&h@
Venus p%rvabh@drapada or ?itr@
Jupiter "rava#aor vi"@kh@
5@h% 'ye&h@
Unnamed planet ?itr@ Between ?itr@ and .v@t
The scholars who have studied these astronomical references have tried to explain the
apparent contradictions by regarding them as interpolations. Because the descriptions appear in
four different segments, some29have suggested that they belong to interpolations done at
2F
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
30/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 29
different times. Some scholars30have even suggested that some of the"loka-s belong to
.abh@parvanand not toBh&!aparvan perhaps due to mix-up in later editing operations.
Sengupta, exasperated by these inconsistencies declared them as hopelessly inconsistent
astrological effusions of evil omens fit for Mother Gooses tales only and hence no faith
can be put in any of these statements. So he completely ignores the planetary positions or
eclipses.
However, the author was in for a pleasant surprise by a simulation of the statement
Edh6!aket%r !ah@ghora; p%&ya! @kra!ya ti&atiF1Kane31had suggested that
dh%!aket%F here may refer to Halleys Comet. When the author looked for the position of
Halleys Comet, in 3067 BCE, it was in fact near p%&ya/ -cancri. However, this could not be
taken as proof that it was the same Comet that was observed and recorded in the epic. Soon the
author32
realized that the astronomical references in theBh&!a parvan are in fact very
consistent and that [email protected] is very systematic in his treatment of these omens and the difficulties
are due to the translation of the wordgrahaalways as a planet. It is not so, because it can mean a
planet, a comet or an asteroid, any heavenly object that can grasp (=grah) a nak&atra1 The
correct meaning can be assigned by following the intricate rules of abhidh@/ lak&a#@ andvyaketo abhidh@). It is abhidh@ through which we understand
the meaning which belongs to the word by common consent. This meaning is the principal
meaning. Sometimes the direct use of the primary meaning leads to a contradiction or absurdity.
Then it becomes b@dhit@, and a secondary or alternative meaning or an indirect significance of
the word is to be used. This is indicated by lak&a#@1(!%khy@rthabadhe r6:hitotha prayojan@t
anyortho lak&yate yat .@ lak&a#@ropit@ kriy@) Thus when the primary meaning,graha=planet
leads to an absurdity, the alternate meaninggraha= Comet is to be used. However, Comets are
denoted asgrahap%tra-s in astronomical texts. Thus the interpretation becomesgraha
grahap%traComet. Thus "aniC omet, son of"ani1The use will be further explained later.
+0 ye!gar (2004)
+1Ja!e (197F)
+2Achar(2004)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
31/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 30
The astronomical references can be grouped into four different segments because they
pertain to four different aspects of the ill omens as will be shown below. The tradition of
recognizing astronomical ill omens can be traced to4tharvavedaGGand itsPari"i&a.G3and the ill
omens described in the epic are consistent with the tradition.
5.2a The First segment
"loka s (20-23) of chapter 2 constitute the first segment. [email protected] describes the omens
foretelling the imminent war. Before describing the ill omens, he makes it clear that a great
disaster is bound to occur just as indicated by the ill omens:
iha y%ddhe !ah@r@ja bhavi&yati !ah@ pa"y@!i bh@rata/
%[email protected]!ane .6rya> kabandhai; pariv@rita>// MB(VI. 2. 20)
OhBh@rata/I observe the sun every day both morning at sunrise and in the evening at
sunset and have seen him as if encircled by long arms (i.e., encircled by a comet).
(x) "vetalohita paryant@; k=agrv@; .avidy%ta;/
trivar#@; parigh@; .andha% bh@n% !@v@rayanty%ta// MB(VI. 2. 21)
I see the sun surrounded by halos on all sides, halos which are tri-colored, dark in the
middle and white and red towards the edges and accompanied by lightning.
(xi) jvalit@rkend% nak&atra> nirvi"e&a dinak&apa>/
ahor@tra> !ay@ d=&a> tatk&ay@ya bhavi&yati// MB(VI. 2. 22)
++
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
32/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 31
I have been watching days and nights the fierce sun, the moon and the stars shining
incessantly and have been unable to distinguish between day and night. This surely
forebodes utter destruction.
(xii) alak&ya; prabhay@hna; pa%r#[email protected]?a k@rtik>/
?androbh6dagnivar#a"?a .a!avar#e nabha.thale// MB(VI. 2. 23)
On the full moon night of k@rtika, the moon with fiery tinge was hardly visible, devoid
of glory, and the horizons were also of the same hue.
It is clear that the intent of [email protected] to impress uponDh=tar@&trathat there is an
imminent war, the armies are standing facing each other ready to fight and that war will bring
about utter destruction. This has also been indicated by the ill omens.
[email protected] by saying that he observes the Sun every day both in the morning at sunrise
and in the evening at sunset. He has noted the appearance of halos and some comets, which
appear to enclose the Sun as if with long arms. The moon had become lusterless on the lunar
eclipse day of k@rtika p6r#i!a1The class of omens thought to indicate an imminent war is quite
consistent with the tradition going back to4tharva veda Pari"i&a1
Consistency with traditionThe verses quoted above can be compared with similar verses (given below with a free
flowing translation) from the chapter 64 of atharvaveda pari"i&a . According to the editor Rai35,
the material presented in this chapter follows the teachings of4
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
33/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 32
Given below are some verses extracted from this chapter %tp@ta lak&a#a/ verses
describingy%ddha.6?akalak&a#a/omens indicative of war, and verses from other chapterswhich are pertinent to this issue:
(a) arkebhra parigh@dn@> parive&orka ?andrayo;
(b) l@k&@lohita var#atva> .arve&@0?a vi?@ra#a>// AP (64. 5. 7)
One should always consider the line of clouds and halos around the sun and the moon
and observe whether they appear red or not in color.
(c) nlalohita paryanta> k=agrva> .avidy%ta>/ AP (61. 1. 4)
which are blue and red towards the edges and dark in the middle and accompanied by
lightning
(d) trivar#e parighev@pi trivar#airv@ bal@hakai;
%[email protected]!aya!iy@dyad .6rya; kad@?anai// AP (61. 1. 15)
(e) p=thivy@> r@java>"y@n@> !ahad bhaya! %pa.thita>// AP (61. 1. 15)
Whenever the sun is surrounded at sunrise or sunset by tri-colored clouds,
(the balahaka clouds), it indicates great calamity to the earth and royal families.
(f) ta!ro bhavati "a.tr@yaHHH11
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
34/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 33
dh6!ravar#o gnivar#o v@ gr@!e&% nagare&% v@// AP (53. 5. 1-2)
the color of the moon (at the time of eclipse)indicates a battle if it is red and disaster to
cities and villages if it is smoky or fiery. Here only the relevant words have been quoted
the words left out are indicated by the dots and not that the remaining text is missing.
The omens described by [email protected] entirely consistent with the description in
atharvaveda pari"i&a. It may be noted that except for the Sun and the Moon, no other
planets have been mentioned in this segment.
5.2b The second segment
In the second segment, consisting of two"loka s, [email protected] the ill omens
foretelling the great harm to the k%r% dynasty and refers to the lunar eclipse, which occurred on
the Full moon day at k=ttika, followed by a solar eclipse. The earth experiences constant tremors.
He also refers to Saturn afflicting rohi#i (Aldeberan) and"vetagrahatransgressing ?itr@/which
indicates the selective destruction of the k%r%clan.
"vetagraha is usually translated as the planet Venus.
(xiii) roho#> p:ayanne&a .titho r@jan "anai"?ara;/
vy@v=tta> lak&!a .o!a.ya bhavi&yati !ahadbhaya>// MB(VI. 2. 32)Oh King, Saturn is harassing Aldebaran and the spot on the Moon has shifted from its
position. Something terrible will happen.
(xiv) abhka> ka!pate bh6!irarka> r@h%[email protected]/
"veto graha.tath@ ?itr@> .a!atikra!ya ti&ati// MB(VI. 3. 11)
The Earth is experiencing tremors intermittently and Rahu has seized the Sun.
"vetagrahahas transgressed Spica.
Consistency with the references in %dyogaparvan
These are almost identical to the omens described by$ar#aearlier in
Udyogaparvan ($a=#a includes in addition the retrograde motion of Mars) at the time of his
riding with$=ain MB (V.141. 7)- MB (V. 141. 10) quoted earlier.This clearly shows that the
second segment in [email protected] toDh=tar@&tra inBh&!aparvan/of ill omens pertaining
to the danger to the k%r%-s is consistent with the astronomical references in %dyogaparvan1 It
may be noted that there is a reference to agraha afflicting ?itr@ in both cases, except here it is
referred to specifically as"vetagraha1
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
35/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 34
5.2c The third segment
[email protected] describes in the third segment further indicators of the calamity to the entire army
(.enayora"iva> ghora>11F). It is this segment that has caused much difficulty to the scholars in
that the planets appear to have been described as being at two or more locations at the same time.
It is possible that the apparent ambiguity and confusion in the stated planetary positions arise
because of the implicit interpretation that the wordgrahameans a planet. When the intricacies of
assigning meaning to a word in Sanskrit are fully realized it will be seen that there are no
inconsistencies in the astronomical references in thisparvan1
The wordgraha(from the rootgrah=to grasp or to seize) refers to any heavenly object,
which can move and hence can grasp or seize a star. Thus, the word refers to a planet or a comet,
although in much later times in Indian Astronomy, during the early years of CE, it came to be
associated with only a planet.
But, [email protected] no doubt to the fact that here the wordgraha refers to a comet:
Egraha% t@!r@r%#a"ikha% prajvalita%F MB (VI. 3. 24)
the [email protected] with coppery and red hair.
It may be noted that the word comet itself derives from the Greek word for hair. Thewordgraha with red hair in the context here can only refer to a comet. Thus the astronomical
references can be understood as references to comets.
Furthermore, as noted by +ar@ha!ihiraGA, the ancient astronomersPar@"araand arga
had studied and classified comets which were all thought to indicate mainly impending
calamities. They referred to comets as grahap%tra-s, specifically as sons of Sun, sons of
Moon, sons of Mercury, sons of Venus, sons of Mars, Children of Jupiter and Children of Saturn.
This practice of considering a comet as grahap%tra can be found in atharvaveda pari"i&aGI
also. Moreover, this can be compared to the practice followed even in modern astronomy.
According to this practice, the one hundred or so short period comets are classified as belonging
to Saturn-family, Jupiter-family etc., depending on whether their aphelia (farthest points from the
Sun in their elliptic orbits) lie within the orbit of Saturn or within the orbit of Jupiter etc.
+=hat (19F1)
+F%ai (19=6)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
36/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 35
Sometimes inBh&!a parvan/the word"ani is used to indicate"anip%tra1 There is
authority from =gvedafor such usage. For example, !ar%dga#a-s are referred to as r%dr@s
instead of r%drap%tr@;, because ofjananjanakayorabhed@t-non difference of the parent from
the son. So the question arises, how should one interpret the word say,"ani? A planet? Or a
comet? The guidelines are provided through abhidh@/ lak&a#@ and vya
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
37/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 36
Some scholars have interpreted this to mean that the planet Mars and the planet Jupiter
are the ones executing retrograde motion, (some interpret that only Mars is retrograde)
implying total confusion and contradiction with other"lokas in this section.
(xvii) bh@gya> nak&atra !@kra!ya .6ryap%tre#a p:yate
"%kra; pro&apade p6rve .a!@r%hya vi"@> pate
%ttaret% parikra!ya .ahita; praty%dk&ate// MB(VI. 3. 14)
The son of Surya has crossed the asterismp%rva-phalg%#/and is vexing. Oh King, [son
of]"%krahas enteredp%rva-pro&apada/going around %ttara-pro&apadaand is rising in
both.
(xviii)"y@!o graha; prajvalita; .adh6!a; .ahap@vaka;
aindra> teja.vi nak"atra> jye&@!@kra!ya ti&ati// MB(VI. 3. 15)
"y@!agrahais luminous and together with dh6!aandp@vakahas crossed over to
jye&@, the bright asterism ruled by9ndra.
"y@!agraha has been interpreted as planet Mercury, leading to confusion. All the three ,
"y@!agraha/ dh6!a andp@vaka refer to comets.
(xix)
dhr%va; prajvalito ghora> apa.avya> pravartate/[email protected]@tyantare ?aiva dhi&ita; par%&o graha;// MB(VI. 3. 16)
The luminous dhr%vahas moved to the right ofghora. Thepar%&a graha
has established itself between ?itr@ and .v@ti.
It is obvious that dhr%vahere cannot refer to the polestar.
(xx) vakr@n%vakra> k=tv@?a "rava#e p@vaka prabha;/
brah!ar@"i> .a!@v=tya lohit@
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
38/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 37
(xxii) k=ttik@.% graha.tvro nak&atre pratha!e jvalan/
vap6>&yapaharan bh@.@ dh6!aket%riva .thita;// MB(VI. 3. 26)
The comet tvrablazing in the first constellation k=ttika, and concealing forms with
luster resembles dh6!aket%.
(xxiii) tri&% p6rve&% .arve&% nak&atre&% vi"@>pate/
b%dha; .a!patate bhka> janayan .%!ahadbhaya>// MB(VI. 3.27)
[son of] Mercury is falling under all the three earlier constellations and
causing a great terror.
[email protected] specifically twelve comets,"veta/ dh6!aket%/ !ah@graha/ par%&a/
p@vaka/ dh6!a/ lohit@
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
39/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 38
month and within an interval of thirteen days, and at an aparva#i moment (i.e., not at the
moment of exact conjunction or opposition of the sun and the moon).
(xxiv)
?at%rda"> pa0?ada"> bh6tap%rv@> ?a &o:a">/
i!@>t% n@bhij@n@!i a!@[email protected]@> trayoda">// MB(VI. 3. 28)
(xxv) ?andra.6ry@v%bha% gra.t@[email protected] trayoda">
aparva#i grah@veta% praj@; .a>k&apayi&yata;// MB(VI. 3. 29)
I know New Moon coinciding with fourteenth, fifteenth and also on the sixteenth day,
but I have never known it coinciding with the thirteenth day. In one and the same month,
both the Sun and the Moon are eclipsed on the thirteenth. These ill-timed eclipses
indicate destruction of the people. Here the wordgraha%refers to the two planets Sun
and the Moon.
This is the famous reference to two eclipses occurring within a month with an interval of thirteen
days. It may be remembered that there was already a reference to a lunar eclipse occurring on
k@rtika pa%r#i!@with a solar eclipse on the following new moon at jye&ha/by$ar#a but
nothing had been said about the time interval between those two. The eclipse at thirteen day
interval must therefore refer to a third eclipse observed later by [email protected] the same eclipseseason. This is borne out by the simulations with the planetarium software and will be discussed
later.
This can be compared with a description from atharvaveda pari"i&aC
yadi t% r@h%r%bha% "a"[email protected]%
gra.ati pak&a!anantara!antata;/
p%r%&a"o#ita karda!a v@hin
bhavati bh6rna ?a var&ati !@dhava;// AP(53. 3.5)
It is clear that the omens described by [email protected] four different segments refer to different
aspects: (i) an imminent war, (ii) calamity to the k%r% dynasty, (iii) destruction of the entire
army, and finally, (iv) danger to the entire population. As such they involve different
astronomical happenings. The truly planetary positions are indicated in the omens pertaining to
the calamity to the k%r%family and in this case the descriptions given by$ar#a in
%dyogaparvanare identical to the descriptions given by [email protected] inBh&!aparvan1The alleged
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
40/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 39
great confusion and ambiguity in planetary positions seen by scholars pertain to the third
segment, which describes omens of a great danger to the entire army. This segment does not
refer to planets, but to comets and has been made explicitly clear by [email protected], but scholars have not
taken note of it. Explicit references by specific names to comets have been mistranslated as
planets, leading to confusion. Compounding the confusion is [email protected] reference to comets as off
springs of planets, but denoting them by the names of the parent planets. But, once it is
recognized that comets are implied here there is no confusion or ambiguity and everything falls
into place. There is no necessity for introducing adhoc hypotheses such as those advanced by
Sharma42, or Iyengar43to account for the ambiguity, because, it is non-existent. The description
of omens turns out to be a coherent account. It is evident that criticism directed against the
descriptions is unwarranted. It may be remarked in passing that other non-astronomical omens in
these two chapters can also be found in atharvaveda pari"i&a
42
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
41/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 40
CHAPTER 6. METHODOLOGY OF DETERMINING THE DATE OF THE WAR
6.1 Planetary positions for determining the date of the war
It is abundantly clear that the true planetary positions described are common to both %dyoga
parvan andBh&!a parvan represent a great calamity to the k%r%family.
It is regarded that planetary positions are most reliable for determining the date of the war and
eclipses are not so reliable. Comets cannot be relied at all44
. Thus"aniat rohi# (Saturn at
Aldeberan) is the most reliable configuration and has been stressed in bothparvan-s. The next is
a
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
42/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 41
6.2 Applications of Planetarium Software
A search is made for the years in which there is a conjunction of Saturn ("ani) with
Aldebaran (5ohi#) between 3500 BCE and 500 CE. As Saturn takes an average of 29.5 years to
go around the sun once, the event also repeats with the same period. There are 137 such
conjunctions during the interval specified above. A search is then made for those years from
among these 137 dates when Mars (a
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
43/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 42
Table 6.1 . Chronology of events according to Raghavan
$=a. departure from Upaplavya nagaraon mission of peace Sept 26, 3067 BCE
$=a reaches7a.tin@p%ra Sept 28, 3067 BCE
Lunar eclipse Sept 29, 3067 BCE
$=a rides with$ar#a Oct 8, 3067 BCE
Solar eclipse Oct 14, 3067 BCE
War begins Nov 22, 3067 BCE
Fourteenth day of War continued till wee hours of morning Dec 8, 3067 BCE
Balarama returns Dec 12, 3067 BCE
Winter Solstice Jan 13, 3066 BCE
Bh&!a.expiry Jan 17, 3066 BCE
The star maps in figures 6.1-6.11 show that the astronomical events are reproduced. In
figure 6.1, the day$=a starts on his diplomatic mission, it is clearly seen that moon is near
revati/ and"ani is atrohi#1Figure 6.2 shows the full moon in k@rtika, it also happens to be a
lunar eclipse day. For the next couple of days$=ais busy with the peace talks in7a.tin@p%ra1
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
44/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 43
Figure 6.1.$=a.Mission for Peace: Departure on September 26, 3067 BCE.
Figure 6.2. Full Moon of$@rtika1Lunar eclipse Day September 29, 3067 BCE
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
45/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 44
Figure 6.3 Lunar eclipse of September 29, 3067 BCE (Redshift 7)
Figure 6.4 shows the star map for October 8, 3067 BCE, when$=arides with$ar#aafter the
failure of the peace mission, it is %ttaraph@lg%#. Seven days from that day, it will be a!@[email protected]
atjye&ha.$=asends the message toBh&!a,Dro#aand$=pa to start the war rituals that day.
Figure 6.4.$ar#a ride. ith $=a %ttara ph@lg%ni nak&atraOctober 8, 3067 BCE
(The thick diagonal line across is the ecliptic)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
46/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 45
The retrograde loop of Mars in that year is shown superposed on the star map for October 8,
3067 BCE in figure 6.5. The track of Mars is shown from December 8, 3068 BCE to October 8,
3067 BCE. The retrograde motion of Mars before reaching'ye&ha had occurred several months
earlier in February. It lasted until May when the motion became pro-grade again. On October 8,
Mars is way past'ye&h@ near"rava#a1 When$=a refers to the coming a!@[email protected] at'ye&h@/
$ar#a remembers this retrograde excursion of Mars which had taken place earlier. The reference
to an6r@dh@> pr@rthayate !aitra> .a!"a!ayanniva is perhaps a poetic pun on the failed
mission.
Figure 6.5 Starmap for October 8, 3067 BCE with track of Mars superposed.
Figure 6.6 shows the star map for October 14, 5067 BCE. The solar eclipse occurs at jye&h@1
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
47/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 46
Figure 6.6 Starmap for October 14, 3067 BCE, solar eclipse atjye&h@
Figure 6.7 shows the star map for November 22, 3067 BCE, the day the war starts: moon is at
bhara#1Figure 6.8 shows the star map for December 8, 3067 BCE, the fourteenth day, when the
war continues until the wee hours of the morning and stops when the moon rises.
Figure 6.7 Starmap for November 22, 3067 BCE. The war begins
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
48/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 47
Figure 6.8 Starmap for December 8, 3067 BCE at the time of Moon rise.
Figure 6.9 shows the star map for December 12, 3067 BCE, the last day of the war, it is "rava#a
nak&atraandBalar@!a returns.
Figure 6.9 Star map for December 12, 3067 BCE. Last day of War
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
49/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 48
Figure 6.10 shows the star map for January 13, 3066 BCE, the day of winter solstice and figure
6.11 shows the star map for January 16, 3067 BCE, the day of Bh&!as expiry:"%kla a&a!/
rohi# nak&atra1
Figure 6.10 Starmap for January 13, 3066 BCE, winter solstice day
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
50/93
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
51/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 50
of the war with the beginning of kaliy%ga in 3102 BCE which the astronomers who make the
pa0?@
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
52/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 51
Figure 6. 13 shows the star map for October 8, 3137 BCE. It is a New Moon day, but it occurs
near an6r@:h@and notjye&h@/ it is not an eclipse day. Mars is nearjye&h@, but is never
retrograde that year and Saturn is atp6rv@&@:ha1 The solar eclipse had occurred near !akh@in
July 3137 BCE. The lunar eclipses occurred near Uttara ph@lg%# andp6rv@bh@draand not near
k=ttik@1 In other words, the astronomical events of 3137 BCE do not correspond to those
described in the epic.
Figure 6.13 Star map for October 8, 3137 BCE. New Moon at an6r@:h@
Figure 6.14 shows the star map for September 1, 3139 BCE . The solar eclipse takes place at
?itr@1The lunar eclipse on August 16, 3139 BCE takes place at %ttar@bh@draand the one on
September 15 takes place at a"vin1 Saturn is near !6la and Mars is near ?itr@1 Moreover, Mars
never goes retrograde that year. It is obvious that the date of 3139 BCE does not satisfy the
astronomical events described in the epic.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
53/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 52
Figure 6.14 Star Map for September 1, 3139 BCE
Figure 6.15 shows the star map for September 12, 3102 BCE. The solar eclipse takes place at
.v@ti ad notjye&h@1 Saturn is atp6rv@bh@dra and not rohi#1 Mars is near !akh@ and does not
go retrograde the whole year. In short, 3102 BCE is not the date of the war.
Figure 6.15 Starmap for September 12, 3102 BCE
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
54/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 53
Thus these dates, 3102 BCE, or 3138 BCE, with the +/- 1 variation, even though they appear to
follow the tradition, are not the dates for the war. These authors peg the date to the astronomers
kaliy%ga a topic discussed in greater detail later. It has thus been demonstrated that there is
serious noncompliance with the astronomical data of the epic for all dates other than 3067 BCE
that have been proposed as the date of the war. Additional details can be obtained from several
publications of the author.46
From a historic point of view, any date around 3000 BCE can be accepted as the date of the
war. It will be argued later that, it appears from an astronomical point of view, the war could not
have taken place much earlier than 3000 BCE, nor could it have taken place much later than
2000 BCE. These two dates form sort of upper and lower limts for the date of the war.
46Achar (2004a, 2004b, 2007)
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
55/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 54
CHAPTER 7 ADVERSE OPINIONS
Ever since the presentation was made by the author in Bangalore in 2003, there have been
several criticisms of this date for the war, 3067 BCE. The first vicious attack was made by
Chandrahari47
. His comments and the authors response to it were published in the same
publication referred to earlier. Another attack was made by Kaul48
both on the internet and in a
personal communication. Iyengar49
wrote a scathing review and both the review and the authors
response have been published. Other criticisms voiced both on the internet and by personal
communication are those of Koch50
, Vartak51
, and Bhattacharjya52
, which have all been
responded to. It was thought that it was important to present at one place all these adverse
opinions and the authors response as these opinions are not based on unbiased critical analysis.
It may be noted that all of these authors have their own dates to promote for the Mahabharata
war, except Chandrahari. Chandrahari does not believe in the historicity of the Mahabharata war
and has declared on the internet that perhaps the war took place in the sky and not on land.
Iyengar advocates a date, 1478 BCE for the war. Koch who supports the AIT theory promotes a
date of 1198 BCE. Kaul does not advocate any particular date. Vartak proposes a date of 5500
BCE and Bhattacharjya, 3139 BCE. It is worth discussing the validity of these criticisms in the
context of the dates proposed by these scholars. The main points are discussed below.
The first concern is the veracity of the primary planetary positions which form the basis for
determining the date of 3067 BCE, namely,"ani at rohi#/ a
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
56/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 55
been pronounced by every scholar from Dikshit, Kane and Vaidya onwards and as stressed by
the exasperation of Sengupta:
All this is hopelessly inconsistent astrological effusion of evil omens fit for
Mother Gooses Tales only
and
We cannot put any faith in any statement of this chapter.
However, scholars have attempted to make sense of the astronomical references and arrive at
some possible date as has been done in the present work also. The approach taken in this work is
based on the well-known rules of interpretation in Sanskrit. If there is a conflict in the meaning
between two statements, the one to be accepted is determined by the relative strength, bala/ of
the statements and the second statement should be interpreted according to rules of abhidh@/
lak&a#@ and vya0jan@v=tti. Some statements could be rejected altogether if they are totally
irrelevant.
7.1C""e!ts a#$t pla!etar% psiti!s
7.1a"ani at rohi#
When there are several statements containing the same word, which statement should beconsidered to refer to the principal meaning of the word? This is decided by the bala or
strength of the statement.
A statement by a main character of the epic such as $=a/ $ar#a or [email protected] considered to be
intrinsically of more bala than a statement made by a secondary character such as M@rka#deya
or @lava1
.apta!@??@pi diva.@d a!@[email protected]@ bhavi&yati
.angr@!a> yojayet tatra t@>hy@h%; "akradevat@>// MB(V. 140. 18)
Seven days from now falls the New Moon day, with9ndraas the Deity for the nak&atraof the
day. (i.e.,'ye&h@ nak&atra). Let the war rituals be started on that day.
This statement made by$=ato$ar#a in %dyogaparvan is of very high importance, and is so
recognized by all, including Sengupta. However, the point that needs further discussion is
whether the statement refers to starting of the war itself on that a!@[email protected] or only to the war
rituals. In any case it is clear that the war took place on or after the a!@[email protected] atjye&h@
nak&atra, which follows thepa%r#i!@ of k@rtik@.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
57/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 56
The statement in %dyogaparvan uttered by$ar#a:
pr@j@patya> hi nak&atra> graha. tko !ah@dy%ti;/
"anai"?ara; p:ayati p:ayan pr@#inodhika>// MB(V.141. 7)
is very strong in terms of bala. Almost identical statement by [email protected] inBh&!aparvan:
roho#> p:ayanne&a .titho r@jan "anai"?ara;/ MB (VI. 2. 32) is equally strong. We have
interpreted it to mean a conjunction of"ani with rohi#1 The fact that these two statements are
identical, makes the statement of the position of"ani at rohi#a doubly strong statement. Hence,
the primary meaning the planet"ani is at rohi# applies here. Furthermore, it follows that if there
is any reference to position of"aniwhich is in conflict with this position near rohi#, then the
word"ani in the second context should be interpreted differently.
Iyengar also accepts this position of"ani at rohi#1 But his own date for the war, 1498 BCE, does
not satisfy this condition. But some of the other scholars53do not accept this configuration for
Saturn, even though it is doubly strong.
7.1b Lunar eclipse on k@rtika pa%r#i!@ and solar eclipse atjye&h@
During the conversation with$=a/ $ar#amakes the following statement:
.o!a.ya lak&!a vy@v=tta> r@h%rarka !%pe&yati/ MB(V. 141. 10)The moon lost its luster and r@h% is approaching the Sun.
He is referring to the lunar eclipse that has already occurred on k@rtika pa%r#i!@and the solar
eclipse atjye&h@ nak&atra is yet to occur.
Almost identical statements are made by [email protected] inBh&!aparvan/
vy@v=tta> lak&!a .o!a.ya bhavi&yati !ahadbhaya>// MB(VI. 2. 32)
the spot on the Moon has shifted from its position. Something terrible will happen.
and by the statement
H1arka> r@h%[email protected]// MB(VI.3.11) ,
[email protected] to the solar eclipse atjye&h@which has already taken place by the time he meets
Dh=tar@&tra.
7+he "hrase "anai"?ara; p:ayati has bee! i!ter"reted o! the basis of astroogy as referri!g to vedh@E of
"ani1
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
58/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 57
[email protected] leaves no doubt that he referred to the lunar eclipse on k@rtika pa%r#i!@:
alak&ya; prabhay@hna; pa%r#[email protected]?a k@rtik>// MB (VI. 2. 23).
These statements clearly indicate that first there was a lunar eclipse on k@rtika pa%r#i!@
followed by a solar eclipse atjye&h@ nak&atraand that the solar eclipse had already taken place
by the time [email protected] makes these statements. Since [email protected] meetsDhr=tar@&trabefore the war, and
the solar eclipse has already taken place/ this is another reason why the war could not have
started on the a!@[email protected] atjye&h@1
Some interpret the statements to mean that the [email protected] metDh=tar@&tra on the eve of k@rtika
pa%r#i!@/ but this cannot be taken seriously as the k@rtika pa%r#i!@ event had already
happened even before$=a rides with$ar#a1
In criticizing my paper, Iyengar denies that there is a reference is to a lunar eclipse on k@rtika
pa%r#i!@1 He also expresses a doubt that$ar#a could predict a solar eclipse. He asserts that
there is no mention of a solar eclipse injye&h@1 He further claims that the occurrence of a lunar
eclipse on k@rtika pa%r#i!@ followed by a solar eclipse injye&h@ is an extrapolation in the
realm of possibility but not attested by the Mahabharata text, in spite of the source statements
just quoted. Yet, in his own paper, he counts the$ar#as statement as the second referenceamong the eight references to solar eclipses in the epic he mentions in his paper. He thinks that
these statements about k@rtika pa%r#i!@ refer to some unspecified optical anomaly. While he
accepts a solar eclipse in the year of war, he does not say when this occurs. In his date 1498
BCE, the solar eclipse occurs inp%narva.6/ and not atjye&h@1He accuses the author of ignoring
the solar eclipse referred to in .abh@parvan/ at the time of the [email protected] y@ga(one of the three
solar eclipses ranging an interval of nearly fifty years that he bases his calculations on, the other
two being the one in the year of the war and the one 36 years later). He forgets that the eclipse at
[email protected] time happened a long time ago before the war and is not immediately relevant as an
omen for the war. Naturally, the eclipse he determines in 1498 BCE is irrelevant to the epic as it
occurs inp%narva.6/ at a time far removed from the month of k@rtika/the time of conversation
between$=a and Kar#a. Koch does accept the lunar and solar eclipses as described in the text,
but in his date 1198 BCE, the solar eclipse occurs first and is followed by the lunar eclipse.
Kochs solution? After a long discussion, he concludes that [email protected] was probably confused! He
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
59/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 58
lists three different eclipses which occurred in several different years that could have been
incorporated into the epic.
7.1c Retrograde motion of Mars nearjye&h@
Finally,$ar#a tells$=a about the retrograde motion of Mars:
k=tv@ ?@ jye&h@y@> !adh%.6dana/
an6r@dh@> pr@rthayate !aitra> .a>"a!ayanniva// MB(V.141. 8)
Mars has performed a retrograde near Antares, oh, !adh%.6dana/and appears
to be praying for an6r@dh@s friendship, as if to pacify it.
Motion of Mars described in 3067 BCE in the paper has been criticized by Chandrahari, Iyengar
and Koch as not according to the description given in the epic. Furthermore, Iyengar adds that
the position of Mars on 8th
of October 3067 BCE, near"rava#a as shown in figure 6.5, was not
visible to$ar#a1
This criticism is based on the following interpretation of the verse MB(V.141.8) quoted
above:
(a)
Hars becoes retrograde i! Pjye&h@F a!d o8es toBard Pan6r@dh@Q i! retrograde otio!
(b)
his e8e!t ha""e!s at the tie of the co!8ersatio! betBee!$=a a!d$ar#aa!d the "ositio!of Hars shoud be betBee!jye&h@ a!d an6r@dh@
(c)
his e8e!t takes "ace at the tie of the eci"ses a!d is obser8ed by$ar#a as such hese are
eC"icity stated by &ha!drahari a!d i"ied by ye!gar
A moments reflection will show that this interpretation and hence the criticism based on it are
beset with a number of astronomical impossibilities. First of all the conversation between $=a
and$ar#a takes place seven days before the new moon injye&h@. Hence the Sun must be near
an6r@dh@ and moving towardsjye&h@ so as to reach it in seven days.If Mars also were to be
moving fromjye&h@ to an6r@dh@ at the same time, Mars would be near the Sun, in conjunction
and hence invisible; how could$ar#atell that Mars is moving fromjye&h@ to an6r@dh@?
Furthermore, for retrograde motion Mars would have to be in opposition to the Sun and not in
conjunction. So the retrograde motion of nearjye&h@ cannot take place at the same time when
the Sun is nearjye&h@, but only when the Sun is near k=ttik@ or rohi#1 So the retrograde motion
must have taken place sometime earlier and Mars must have moved past an6r@dh@1 This is
exactly what figure 6.5 shows. Only Koch understands correctly the astronomy involved.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
60/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 59
Chandrahari and Iyengar do not appear to appreciate the astronomical difficulty in interpreting
that Mars was retrograde nearjye&h@ at the time of$=a-$ar#a dialogue. Furthermore,
Iyengars comment about Mars as shown in figure 6.5 was invisible to$ar#ais plainly wrong,
as the Sun set at 6:34 pm that evening and Mars set at 9:46 pm and was visible for nearly three
hours as an evening star.
The proper interpretation would recognize that the reference tojye&h@ nak&atraby$=a
reminds$ar#aof the retrograde motion of Mars which had taken place some months earlier and
the reference to prayer to an6r@dh@ for friendship is a poetic pun based on !itra/ its adhipati
and the failed mission for peace of$=a1
Thus the criticisms of the basic planetary positions on which the date of 3067 BCE is derived are
not valid and the basis of the derivation is on firm ground.
7.2Observability of the eclipses at$%r%k&etra
7.2a Solar eclipse of October 14, 3067 BCE
Iyengar completely discounts the calculated solar eclipse on October 14, 3067 BCE (figure 6.6).
Chandrahari and Kaul say the solar eclipse is possible but not observable at k%r%k&etra1
Koch says that his calculations show that the solar eclipse begins at a latitude of 18.7 N andends at a latitude of 17.8 S and it takes place far too west of India and would not be visible and
is in the not possible category.
Iyengar, in echoing Chandraharis comment adds that it is the authors wishful thinking that this
eclipse was the one referred to in the epic.
The response to this criticism is that there is a lot of uncertainty in eclipse calculations and this
has already been alluded to in Chapter 4. As already discussed, because of the great uncertainty
in eclipse calculations it was decided to accept the occurrence of an eclipse as sufficient without
worrying about the visibility or not at a particular place. As against this statement, Chandrahari
and Kaul declare that the calculated eclipse was invisible at$%r%k&etra and hence inadmissible
as evidence for the validity of 3067 BCE as the date. Iyengar joins them in this argument, even
though he does not even accept the solar eclipse at jye&h@ as a fact. Kochs argument is better
than the three others. He at least shows that according to his calculations, the solar eclipse of
October 14, 3067 BCE occurs, but does not pass the test for observably possible category.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
61/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 60
When eclipse calculations for times long gone by are made, the positions of the Sun, the Moon
and the earth are determined by solving certain equations with codes extrapolating over long
periods of time. For visibility calculations accurate knowledge of a certain quantity called Delta
T(= difference between what is called Terrestrial Time ,TT, and Universal Time, UT) is
essential. However, when calculations are extrapolated to BCE years, there is an uncertainty in
Delta T itself. According to estimates, when extrapolated to 3000 BCE, the values of Delta T
range from 18.3 hours to 27.3 hours, with a variation of about 9 hours 54 in the estimates of Delta
T. Table 7.1 lists the actual values of Delta T used in the calculation of the solar eclipse on
October 14, 3067 BCE by two software products and by Kaul. The difference between the
largest and the smallest values is seen to be 13000 seconds (3.6 hours). As a consequence, the
location of the eclipse becomes uncertain. This uncertainty is inherent in any calculation and
cannot be avoided. There is no way one can definitely answer is this eclipse visible? without
pointing to the uncertainty. The implications are obvious when the maximum duration of a total
solar eclipse is only little over 7 minutes at any location but the uncertainty is several hours. All
that the calculations can do is to show that an eclipse occurred, which will be certain, but leave
the question of visibility somewhat uncertain. Different software products could yield differingresults. For example, the New Moon on October 14, 3067 BCE occurs at 8:32 (UT) according to
SkyMap Pro, but at 11:33 (UT) according to Cybersky, a difference of three hours.
The eclipse map in figure 7.1 shows the regions of totality and partial eclipse visibility as
computed by Redshift 7. As shown in figure 7.1, the central line shows that the eclipse begins at
a latitude of 2103N and longitude 7333W and ends at a latitude of 1554S and longitude 24
17E., differing from Kochs results. According to this map also, the eclipse would not be visible
in India as indicated by the upper and lower limiting visibility lines. However, a rotation of the
earth by an angle of 75 (5 hours in time)55would bring the eclipse to a partial eclipse in the
likely visible category in India. The eclipse is likely to have been visible at k%r%k&etra1 It is
not authors wishful thinking as mentioned by one of the critics, but an acceptable piece of
evidence within the uncertainty of calculations. Uncertainties of this nature are inherent in any
74Joch argues that the u!certai!ty is saer a!d is about 2=7 hours i! +000 &L, but see abe =2
77his is ess tha! 2 C (u!certai!ty i! Deta ) e8e! taki!g the saer 8aue of Joch of 2=7 hrs
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
62/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 61
eclipse calculation extrapolated to thousands of years ago. It is incredulous to demand an exact
answer. The author rejects the criticisms of Kaul and Koch as being not valid.
Table 7.1 Values of Delta T for the solar eclipse calculation of October 14, 3067 BCE
Calculation using SkyMap Pro Cybersky Kauls software
Delta T 87874 seconds 77032 seconds 74836 seconds
Figure 7.1. Eclipse map for the solar eclipse of 14 October, 3067 BCE. (Redshift 7)
7.2b Lunar eclipse of Sept 29, 3067 BCE (k@rtika pa%r#i!@)
Chandrahari claims that there was no lunar eclipse on September 29th
at all and Iyengar simply
quotes Chandrahari in criticizing this date. Koch and Kaul accept the possibility of lunar eclipse,
but they calculate a magnitude of 0.14 and hence declare that to be beyond human capacity to
observe it as it is less than the required magnitude 0.6. Again the uncertainties in eclipse
calculations on dates so long ago cannot be stressed more. Here Chandraharis calculation gives
no eclipse at all, but Kauls and Kochs calculations yield a possible eclipse of magnitude 0.14,
which they say is beyond the visibility limit. My own calculations yield a magnitude of 0.246 for
the eclipse. Figure 7.2 shows the eclipse of September 29, 3067 BCE as obtained from Redshift
7.
8/11/2019 Date of Mahabharata War using planetarium software
63/93
Achar / Date of Mahabharata war / 62
Figure 7.2 Lunar eclipse of September 29, 3067 BCE (Redshift 7)
7.2c Lunar eclipse of October 28, 3067 BCE
The lunar eclipse of October 28, 3067 BCE was actually first seen by the author by simulation
and the star map for this date is shown in figure 7.3. The eclipse is shown in figure 7.4. This
formed the third eclipse in the eclipse season and the author proposed it as a solution to the
problem of two eclipses occurring within 14 days56
. When in 3031 BCE, 36 years after the war,
the same sequence of eclipses was repeated, it was considered a validation of the interpretation.
Unfortunately some scholars (Upadhyaya57) ha