7
Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program Informational Presentation to the Board of Education August 16, 2012

Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program. Informational Presentation to the Board of Education August 16, 2012. Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) – Communication Arts. Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) – Mathematics. Achievement Level Comparative Districts. ESEA Waiver/MSIP 5. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

Data PresentationMissouri Assessment Program

Informational Presentation to the Board of Education

August 16, 2012

Page 2: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) – Communication Arts

COMARTS 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

FHSD Growth11 to 12

State Growth11 to 12

School Total (All Kids) 53.0 60.7 65.7 67.2 69.4 2.2 0.4

Asian/Pacific Isl. 53.5 66.8 70.6 71.1 75.5 4.4 5.9

Black 33.8 39.3 43.9 44.6 49.4 4.8 0.0

Hispanic 33.2 46.9 47.6 46.0 51.7 5.7 5.5

White 54.4 62.3 67.7 69.4 71.9 2.5 1.2

F/R Lunch 32.2 39.5 42.9 46.4 49.2 2.8 1.4

IEP 21.9 30.2 34.8 34.6 30.5 -4.1 -0.1

LEP 3.6 17.2 23.1 26.4 33.1 6.7 -6.1

Page 3: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) – Mathematics

MATH 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012FHSD

Growth11 to 12

State Growth11 to 12

School Total (All Kids) 58.0 60.5 66.3 67.8 69.6 1.8 1.3

Asian/Pacific Isl. 69.8 67.8 74.3 77.3 81.8 4.5 4.2

Black 30.4 36.9 40.6 39.2 44.5 5.3 0.7

Hispanic 37.4 45.6 51.6 56.4 55.5 -0.9 6.0

White 59.9 62.2 68.5 70.0 71.6 1.6 1.2

F/R Lunch 33.5 39.1 44.6 46.1 48.9 2.8 1.6

IEP 27.4 34.1 36.4 36.3 34.8 -1.5 0.0

LEP 13.8 26.6 36.2 41.8 42.9 1.1 -2.8

Page 4: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

Achievement Level Comparative Districts

Schools Com Arts 2011 2012Francis Howell 67.83 69.37

Ft. Zumwalt 63.71 65.93Wentzville 64.11 65.71Orchard Farm 58.79 61.22St. Charles 55.22 57.83

Rockwood 74.11 74.63Parkway 70.12 72.12Pattonville 59.18 58.93

Schools Math 2011 2012Francis Howell 66.97 68.85

Wentzville 66.56 66.97Ft. Zumwalt 58.89 61.79St. Charles 56.9 57.27Orchard Farm 53.84 56.53

Rockwood 72.19 72.88Parkway 69.08 70.9Pattonville 57.44 57.36

Page 5: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

2012 Final Annual Performance Report (APR)14/14 Indicators MET

9.1*1 – MAP Grades 3-5 Mathematics H1 MET9.1*2 – MAP Grades 3-5 Communication Arts H1 MET9.1*3 – MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics H1 MET9.1*4 – MAP Grades 6-8 Communication Arts H1 MET9.1*5 – EOC Algebra I Mathematics H1 MET9.1*6 – EOC English II Communication Arts H1 METSubject Area and Voluntary EOC Bonus POINT Grade 5 Science – H2 Grade 8 Science – H1 Biology I Science – H1Voluntary – English I – H1

(MET)Unused bonus

point

9.3 – ACT H1 MET9.4*1 – Advanced Courses H1 MET9.4*2 – Career Education Courses Avg MET9.4*3 – College Placement H1 MET9.4*4 – Career Education Placement H2 MET9.5 – Graduation H2 MET9.6 – Attendance H1 MET9.7 – Subgroup Achievement H1 MET

Page 6: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

ESEA Waiver/MSIP 5

• Central Elementary and Harvest Ridge Elementary are not “Focus” or “Priority Schools” as identified for MSIP 5

Page 7: Data Presentation Missouri Assessment Program

State Ranking

• A single MAP Performance Index (MPI) score was created for all districts in the state. This score was then ranked for all districts in the state.

MSIP 4 Calculation – 23rd in stateMSIP 5 Calculation – 25th in state