Upload
shees-hassan-shaikh
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
1/6
Darwin Correspondence Project
Letter 3088
Darwin, C. R.toCollingwood, Cuthbert
14 Mar [1861]f1
Summary
CD is not surprised at CCs entire rejection of his views. Agrees that there is no direct proof of
unlimited variation. Says natural selection should be viewed as comparable to wave theory of light:
it is probable because it groups and explains a host of facts in several fields of science.
Agrees Louis Agassizs review [Am. J. Sci.2d ser. 30 (1860): 14255] is not unfair, but Agassizmisunderstands CD. His categories of thought are to CD merely empty words.
Transcription
Down Bromley Kent
March 14th.
Dear Sir
I am much obliged for your long letter, as I always like to know how naturalists view the subject.
I feel not a shade of surprise at your entirely rejecting my views;f2my surprise is that I have been
successful in converting some few eminent Botanists, Zoologists, & Geologists. In several casesthe conversion has been very slow & that is the only sort of conversion which I respect. Ientirely
agree with you that there is no more direct proof of variation beingunlimited in amount than
there is that it is strictly limited. In a new & corrected Edit. of the Origin, which will appear in
about a week or two, I have pointed this as emphatically as I could.f3I did not formerly explicitly
say this (but indirectly in several places) because I thought it was obvious.
The manner in which I wish to approach the whole subject, & in which it seems to me it may
fairly be approached, I can best illustrate by the case of Light. The Ether is hypothetical, as are its
undulations; but as the undulatory hypothesis groups together & explains a multitude of
phenomena, it is universally now admitted as the true theory. The undulations in the ether areconsidered in some degree probable, because sound is produced by undulations in air. So natural
selection, I look at as in some degree probable, or possible, because we know what artificial
selection can do. But I believe in Nat. Selection, not because, I can prove in any single case that it
has changed one species into another, but because it groups & explains well (as it seems to me) a
host of facts in classification, embryology, morphology, rudimentary organs, geological succession
& Distribution.
I have no space to discuss the many points alluded to in your letter. I cannot see such
perfection in structure as you do. In the new Edit. I have attempted to explain how it is that many
low forms have not progressed to a higher grade of organisation.f4I did not allude to the very curious subject of alternate generations, because I did not, & do not
yet, see, how it has anyspecialbearing on my views.f5I look at alternate generations, as not
http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/Documents/But%20I%20believe%20in%20Nat.%20Selection,%20not%20because,%20I%20can%20prove%20....odt#mark-3088.f1http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/Documents/But%20I%20believe%20in%20Nat.%20Selection,%20not%20because,%20I%20can%20prove%20....odt#mark-3088.f2http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f4http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f5http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/Documents/But%20I%20believe%20in%20Nat.%20Selection,%20not%20because,%20I%20can%20prove%20....odt#mark-3088.f1http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/Documents/But%20I%20believe%20in%20Nat.%20Selection,%20not%20because,%20I%20can%20prove%20....odt#mark-3088.f2http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f4http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f5http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/7/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
2/6
essentiallydiffering from various stages in any one individual larvaa form of gemmation being
merely added at some stage. Under this point of view I see no essential difference between
alternative generation & metamorphosis: you, I presume, take some very different view.
I forget what Agassiz says on subject. I quite agree with you that Agassizs Review is not in the
least unfair.f6He misunderstands me a good deal. His categories of thought, prophetictypes &
his views on classification are to me merely empty sounds.f7
To others they seem full of meaning.I received several months ago, & thank you for, a very curious pamphlet on representative
forms, (or some such title) which interested mevery much.f8
With my best thanks, I remain | Dear Sir | Yours very faithfully | Charles Darwin
I am much pleased at & grateful for the sentence which you kindly copy from a recent letter
from Agassiz. I once saw him, & was charmed with him.f9
Footnotes
f1The identity of the correspondent and the year are based on the reference to CDs having received several
months ago a pamphlet on representative forms (Collingwood 1860a). See n. 8, below.
f2Collingwoods letter has not been found. Presumably the letter raised many of the objections to CDs theory
discussed in a paper Collingwood delivered before the Literary and Philosophical Society of Liverpool on
10 December 1860. In the paper, Collingwood contrasted Darwins views on the origin of species with those of
Louis Agassiz, as expressed in his critical review ofOrigin(Agassiz 1860). Collingwood concluded that Agassizs
criticism was one of the most conclusive and formidable (against Darwins theory) which had yet appeared.
(Collingwood 1860b, p. 81). Collingwood sent CD a copy of this paper, which is in the Darwin Pamphlet
CollectionCUL.
f3Origin3d ed., p. 89.
f4Origin3d ed., pp. 13343.
f5In his paper, Collingwood discussed Agassizs view that the alternation of generations and other examples of
polymorphism within a species were far more astonishing phenomena, strictly circumscribed between the
natural limits of unvarying species, than the slight differences produced by the intervention of men, among
domesticated animals (Agassiz 1860, p. 153). Collingwood then stated that these phenomena had been ignored
by CD. See Collingwood 1860b, pp. 925. The passages in question are marked in CDs copy of the paper.
f6Collingwood 1860b was written to defend Agassiz 1860 against the view expressed by Henry Hugh Higgins
that Agassizs review was quite unworthy of so distinguished a naturalist (Higgins 1860, p. 42).
f7In Collingwood 1860b, pp. 835, Collingwood attempted to elucidate Agassizs concept that species, while
having no material existence, yet existed as categories of thought (Agassiz 1860, p. 142). Agassiz discussed the
concept of prophetic types in the first volume ofContributions to the natural history of the United States of America
(Agassiz 185762, 1: 11618), a copy of which is in the Darwin LibraryCUL (see also letter to George Rolleston,
7 March [1861] and n. 4).
f8A lightly annotated copy of Collingwood 1860a, inscribed Charles Darwin Esq with the Authors Compts., is
in the Darwin Pamphlet CollectionCUL.
f9CD may be referring to the 1846 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, at which
Agassiz spoke to a meeting of the Ray Society that CD attended. SeeCorrespondencevol. 4, letter to J. E. Gray,
http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f6http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f6http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f7http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f8http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f9http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f1http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f2http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f4http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f5http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f5http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f6http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f7http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f7http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f8http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f8http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f9http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f6http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f7http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f8http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#mark-3088.f9http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f1http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f2http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f3http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f4http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f5http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f6http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f7http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f8http://c/Users/XDA%20Developers/AppData/Local/Temp/$PowerISO$/entry-3088.htm#back-mark-3088.f97/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
3/6
18 December 1847.
Letter details
Letter no.
DCP-LETT-3088
From
Darwin, C. R.
To
Collingwood, Cuthbert
Sent from
Down
Source of text
British Library(Add. MS. 37725, ff. 69b)
Physical description
ALS 8pp
Also published in
De Beer (1958): 112
Correspondence9: 53
Please cite asDarwin Correspondence Database,
http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-3088accessed on Wed Oct 8 2014
Source
http://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3088.xml
For scanned images of this letter from published sources see Charles Darwin,The Correspondence of
Charles Darwin: Volume 9: 1861, ed. Frederick Burkhardt et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1994), 9:535:
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-
WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+
one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIM
DAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not
%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=false
https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-3088.xmlhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Sent%20from=is+exactly%3A%3ADownhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Sent%20from=is+exactly%3A%3ADownhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Repository=is:BL:BLhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Repository=is:BL:BLhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/physical-descriptionshttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-3088http://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3088.xmlhttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-1021http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Sent%20from=is+exactly%3A%3ADownhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Repository=is:BL:BLhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/advanced-search#type=letters&itemsPerPage=25¤tPage=1&filterOperand=AND&filter_Repository=is:BL:BLhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/physical-descriptionshttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/bibliographyhttp://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-3088http://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3088.xmlhttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.in/books?id=FSjKOoqg-WAC&pg=PA54&dq=darwin+but+i+believe+in+natural+selection+not+because+it+has+changed+one+species+into+another&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5jrmjwa3RAhWBPI8KHf_RBl0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=darwin%20but%20i%20believe%20in%20natural%20selection%20not%20because%20it%20has%20changed%20one%20species%20into%20another&f=falsehttps://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-3088.xml7/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
4/6
7/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
5/6
7/25/2019 Darwins Letter to Thomas Thomson Saying I Do Not Have Proof ... (1861)
6/6