Darwin as Medieval Folly 2

7/30/2019 Darwin as Medieval Folly 2

1/13

darwin's medieval folly is just an assembly

of pieces of facts against darwinism. A

mini handbook of interesting aspectsregarding this gnostic medieval folly. that

is rejected indirectly by the orthodox

ecumenical councils.

In the east continued the light of

civilisation whilst the west went through

the dark ages. the west suffered a spiritual

vacuum and rejected the violent

condemning god of the west in favour of

the enlightenment principle that man is a

god according to his own laws, not gods.

This treaty of bits and pieces, darwin'smedieval folly", shows the medieval

origins of darwin's theory. The chaotic

world of random brutality and savagery, as

postulated by atheistic Darwinism, was a

creation not made good, god is nonexistent and does not interact and

participate with man as orthodox christian

doctrine maintains.

it is a heresy also because it tries to explain

creation in a naturalistic and logical way

without true greco roman orthodox like


2/13

reason that is the harmonic function of the

heart and mind working in collaboration.

[view orthodox hesychasm] & st Gregorypalamas.

The orthodox councils condemn this

heresy because it developed under specific

conditions through specific problems that

arose in the west in retaliation to organised

religion yet religiously assuming its core

catholic tenet. Ie. gnosticism which is the

source of all medieval folly that occurred

in the west.

darwinism adopted the catholic cloak of

infallibility without the necessity of naturalreason or the physical sciences to back it

up. orthodoxy never had this dilemma as

no science can ever prove against the

tenets of orthodoxy and for orthodoxy,

science and reason and theology areharmonically complete.

The concept of god creating man in the

name of natural selection, implies

augustine predestination, where the

original paradise was actually the fallen

world. man entered a hostile, brutal and


3/13

unmerciful world where god showed no

love or interaction and that any implication

that physical science indicates a creator isdeemed absolute illogical.

This is exactly how catholicism viewed the

world, in a gnostic fashion, the dualistic

idea that the body is evil, that any order

and symmetry in the world is not god's

work for our salvic and healing benefit,

but an aspect of the fallen god[gnostic]

who creates phantom appearance or godly

order but is really demonic.

In christianity we make a distinction

between these two states of the world preand after fall. darwinism does not and

there can never be a sythesis between the

two. it is simply a materialistic humanistic

gnostic heresy.

Also darwinism is built in completeopposition to any tenets of christian

spirituality. its the premise of materialistic

science, that was born in the west, which

pledges the non existence of the spiritual

and the unseen, by automatic default.

Many findings like the law of


4/13

thermodynamics contradict this basic

fundamental law of materialistic science,

all different scientific departmentscontradict eachother.

darwinism is that very epitome and that

very movement that characterised the

enlightenment which was the complete

rejection of the spiritual aspect of the

bible. And the whole bible for that matter.

All scientific data was to be studied from a

strictly physical view, without the invisible

or unseen, when it is these very unseen

processes that are needed to be consideredto see the whole holistic process of the

system that is being studied in the first

place. Therefore their science is merely the

continuation of medieval dark age folly

that forms the basic tenet of their science.that is gnosticism.

darwinism demolishes the ontology of the

person and the real existence of the person.

evolutionism and predestiny and

transmigration of the souls work hand in

hand, are all tenets of gnosticism. It


5/13

resounds the belief that The person sinning

is not in fact sinning since everything is in

a state of flux transition and evolutionismwhich all inevitable lead to higher states of

spiritual awareness in the next life.

There is therefore no evil! as this would

demean the evolution continuum.[ this

polemic is not about the connections of

esotericism the occult and

darwinism[gnosticism] a whole paper

could be devoted to just this matter.]

The person as a real and essential image of

god is not a passing phantom of randomly

composed matter. He is intentioned andfashioned by the love of god himself.

It does not take someone much thinking

power to see that the idea of a competition

and other antagonisms that repeat inDarwin ideas like the conepts of, natural

selection/survival of the fittest are

completely unchristian. christianity intends

brotherly love, compassion, empathy,

forgiveness and christ shows that your

weakness is my strength. Their is no two


6/13

more diametrically opposed views. darwin

himself spoke of the implication of his

theory and how it is categorically andcompletely unchristian from its prime

inception.

archbishop lazar puhalo, despite some

good orthodox beliefs he has, makes

fundamental errors when he speaks of

creationism as unchristian.

He falls for the western delineated camps

and appellations that have no similarity to

orthodox christianity. just because certain

fundamentalist circles in protestantism

subscribe to such ideas, does not make ituntrue. this is just stupid. is it more

possible that a religion, although not

containing the entire and complete faith

handed down by the apostles, added

truthful elements to her organisationethos? yes.

this creationism is in fact the orthodox's ex

nihilio creation out of nothing.

lazar puhalo would have a problem with

this. christ resurrecting dead bodies,not

literally, christ not resurrecting people


7/13

from the grave, not literally, what is the

implication for not believing literal

creationism? yes atheism! he chargescreationists as irresponsibly causing

atheism well unfortunately lazar puhalo

does what he accuses, lets hope he

renounces this error as one with a contrite

and humble heart if he reviews basic

physical scientific evidence will

automatically see the marvel in god's

creation and will renounce darwinism

which is nothing short of atheism.

Darwinism is nothing short but a wholescientific discourse that tries to explain

creation without the existence of a god.

The contemporaries and proponents of

darwinism admitted this, why not lazar

puhalo? puhalo suffers from the pride ofviewing scientists as infallible experts in

their own field, rather than to discern their

blatant shifting of facts in order to appease

the cult and fallen religion of darwinism.

just like catholicism in the medieval ages

Which man began to rebel from, not


8/13

against god but the western god as it is

commonly recited.

western materialism from the age ofenlightenment can be traced to western

gnosticism or western christianity's view

of separating the world between the

mundane and the divine, without ever

revealing the mysterious working of the

holy spirit and its role with enlightening

creation, the wests dilemma was to

completely reject the divine and unseen

components to their medieval worldview

and preserve merely the mundane aspect.

Instead of recategorising this idea ofmundane in a truly scientific way,

[encompassing physical and spiritual as

orthodox christianity has] as they often

claim, they continued the idea of the

mundane in its known and medieval form.which was the nonsensical dividing

between the body and the soul and from

world with the spiritual.

the catholic church rejected any scientific

observation of the mundane and

assimilated it into its gnostic


9/13

presupposition, which is the divine

polarity from the mundane. the catholic

church consumed and inundated the worldwith a gnostic delusion and fantasy and

overrode all physical and material ideas

and thoughts that were observed as true.

so the humanistic age was developed from

the real spiritual vacuum and dilemma of

the west so to salvage man's thirst for

knowledge and the world around him and

so they fell into the same gnostic errors as

the catholic church, they kept the

foundations of catholicism's infallible

authority, based on gothic tenets offeudalism and orchestrated a science of

infallibility which did the reverse of

catholicism but did the essentially the

same, which is to submerge the world into

a worldview point based on pseudoscience and impose them onto the whole

world in an inquisitorial fashion. It

justified social coercion, it invented

torturous mental asylum therapies under

the guise of psychiatry. it surmised the

brutal beast in a random and merciful


10/13

world idea reminiscent of gnosticism, that

being different or saying non taboo things

could stigmatize you as a imbecile andhave you sent as a mad loony into a mental

asylum in a straight jacket.

materialism religiously followed her

beliefs lobotomy, or removing the brain to

force behavioural changes is one such

barbarous practice. This episode in

western european history, also the forced

sterilization of people deemed unfit to

reproduce[eugenics & social darwinism]

and the treatment of children as slave

labour during the victorian period forcingpeople in forced labour camps as in

victorian england's working houses and the

forced snatching of babies from unmarried

woman all resemble the cruel and

barbarous episodes of the catholic churchinquisition throughout europe. The method

of treatment of science in psychiatry was

social control and coercion which followed

western christianity's practice of social

control and coercion as the principal basis

of feudalistic societies. Also mandated by


11/13

enlighteners like hobbs.

while the person was a free citizen in

constantinople who can inherit property,work for a descent living and have social

welfare and many rights protected by the

emperor, the west literally had the

opposite, as one can see victorian england

in the 18th century. This is in stark

contrast to many ancient greek

authors/philosophers, like democritus who

pledged the idea of equality and symmetry

in the world as manifestations and signs of

a god desiring order through virtue and

praxis, or the pre christian ideal which godworked through before seating christianity

in the greco roman world. Aristotle is

another exemplifying the importance of all

to participate in government, for hobbs,

the idea of a peasant or savage to formopinion in government was abhorrent to

upper class English values.

All science is based on this esoteric ideal.

that man can manipulate the variables of

life for his own short sighted desires.

science in the greco roman and christian


12/13

orthodox sense was associated completely

with both philanthropy and philosophy.

philosophy in the west was the practice ofsome pomps, bar a few, who speculated

upon the nature of things without the

practice of virtue. if one did not practice

virtue, they could not have a clean enough

lense to discern the uncreated knowledge

of god which attests to all things. they

speculated without recourse to the study of

their relationship with the environment

which connected with virtue.

for example, many wrote about equality,

when their society was imbued withhypocrisy. when the western universities,

under the rich, in the 13 century were re

learning justinian's code in a vacuum, they

never thought for one moment they could

actually practice this theory byimplementing it onto all communities who

were suffering from grave inequalities of

feudualism. the irony is that while they re

learnt justinian[in a vacuum],

constantinople in the east was practicing

this law for the benefit and welfare of the


13/13

people. it was a theory not a dead relic,

that was living and breathing.

In other words it was a fashionablemuseum relic, this thing called the equal

rights of man which gathered eventually a

few supporters during the french

revolution which created a tyranny within

itself.

It was often purported by a 19th century

writer, white" how ancient greeks

supported evolutionary theories.

There is absolutely no evidence, but their

is evidence for the blatant fabrication of

greek authors as having these barbaricideas.

birth maximos.

Documents

Darwin as Medieval Folly 2