Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
By Lee Meixian
[email protected]@LeeMeixianBT
Singapore
IT’S NOT just start-ups, tech projects
and social campaigns anymore.
Crowdfunding in Singapore has em-
braced a new asset class: real estate –
nascent even in countries such as the
United States, France and Australia.
Twosuchplatforms,CoAssetsand
DomaCom Singapore, are already
available here. A third, FundPlaces,
will be launched by end-May.
These platforms generally “match-
make” property deals – be they mez-
zanine loans to developers or equity
in physical property – with investors.
Properties can span land banks to de-
velopment projects to completed in-
come-yielding buildings.
The huge benefit it brings to
small-time developers is a quick and
efficient alternative source of fund-
ing,while sophisticated investors like
it for theirnewfoundaccess to real es-
tate deals.
Yet most Singapore developers re-
main wary and prefer more tradition-
al funding sources like bank loans,
debt issuances and shareholder
funds.Consultantsalsodoubt that re-
al estate crowdfunding will become
mainstream in the near future.
Thebiggestgriperemainsthehigh
risks – risks that the promised re-
turns do not materialise, risks that
projectsfailduetoadeveloper’snegli-
gence, or of investors not being able
to liquidate their securities.
The governing regulatory frame-
work is still vague. The Monetary Au-
thority of Singapore (MAS), in seeking
tobalancebetweenfacilitatingsecuri-
ties-based crowdfunding and putting
in place safeguards, has proposed to
limit such investors to only accredit-
ed investors and institutions. The in-
dustry has given its feedback, but the
rules have not been finalised.
Crowdfunding platforms here
themselves are erring on the side of
caution and exercising various forms
of due diligence to avoid non-per-
formance. which they say would hurt
their reputations and goals to be
long-term players.
They ensure that the developers
that listontheirplatformsareofacer-
tain standing, and are target accredit-
ed, institutionalandhighnetworth in-
vestors. The man in the street has no
place in these deals.
For instance, CoAssets requires
the developer to have a Singapore of-
fice and local director who would be
held liable in a default.
Ong Choonfah, chief operating
officer at DTZ SE Asia, pointed out
however that “personal guarantees
are only as good as the person who is
guaranteed”.
Crowdfunding platforms can go to
great lengths, but without more ro-
bust regulations, there are limits to
howmuch theycan protect investors.
Counterparty risks remain, for ex-
ample.
“For most projects, we can’t guar-
antee they won’t fail,” said FundPlac-
es co-founder Tan Kok Keong. “That
isa risk thatall investorshave to take.
But we try to mitigate that risk by
workingwithpeoplewhohaveshown
themselves to be good paymasters,
who are proper business people and
have credible backgrounds.”
☛ Continued on Page 2
Prime Minister Lee HsienLoong is expected to
announce at his retreat with
Malaysian Premier Najib
Razak on Tuesday the location
of Singapore’s terminal
station for the proposed
high-speed rail link with Kuala
Lumpur. TOP STORIES / 2
To avoid nasty – and possibly
costly – surprises in your
investing, don’t be afraid to
look closer at companies’
financial statements and ask
probing questions.
BT-CITIBANK YOUNG INVESTORS’FORUM / 12
If there is a path leading outof the realm of “systemicallyimportant financialinstitutions”, AIG may alreadybe on it, the insurer’s CEOsays. BANKING & FINANCE / 13
China is preparing to shufflethe leadership of its biggestoil companies, helping toclear a path in a crucial areaof the economy for PresidentXi Jinping as he plans hisoverhaul of the nation’sbloated state sector. ENERGY& COMMODITIES / 14
The euro’s slide against theUS dollar is paying off forcompanies from German drugand chemical maker Bayer AGto French cosmetics giantL’Oreal SA, adding tooptimism that the currencymove is fuelling an economicrecovery. CONSUMER / 18
With just a few days to goto the UK elections thisThursday, pollsters, bettingshops, markets and businesspeople have becomeincreasingly convinced thatanother coalition is inevitable.
GOVERNMENT & ECONOMY / 20
After the final bell, boxerFloyd Mayweather jumped onthe ropes and defiantlybarked to the crowd. He knewhe’d won the bout, buteveryone else needed judges’confirmation. Moments later,the scorecards made itofficial. LIFE & CULTURE / 24
By R Sivanithy
@RSivanithyBT
Singapore
A GROUP of professional traders has
complained three times over the past
sixmonths to theSingaporeExchange
(SGX) and the Monetary Authority of
Singapore (MAS) about the mar-
ket-making activities of Macquarie
Capital Securities (MCS) for the Hang
Seng Index (HSI) warrants issued by
Macquarie Bank (MB).
In complaints dated Nov 12, 2014,
Dec 22, 2014 and March 8, 2015, the
traders alleged that the warrants of-
ten did not move in accordance with
theunderlying indexandthe theoreti-
cal pricing model. They listed dozens
of instances, illustrating situations
where call warrants fell instead of ris-
ing when the HSI rose, and where put
warrants also fell when the HSI
dropped.
MCSis thedesignatedmarketmak-
er (DMM) for warrants issued by MB,
which means that MCS is obliged to
provide constant buy-and-sell prices
throughout each trading session.
For example, according to the lat-
est batch of HSI call warrants issued
in April, the term sheet specified that
the maximum bid-offer spread was
10 times the minimum permitted
price movement in the warrants or
S$0.20, whichever was greater.
The complaints alleged that MCS’s
pricing was “erratic” and “unfair”. Be-
tween Dec 22, 2014 and March 8,
2015, the complainants claimed to
have recorded 66 instances of “erraticprice behaviour”, including allegedodd delays in MCS’s automated pricequoting system which proved detri-mental to the complainants’ tradingpositions.
When contacted, an SGX spokes-man said it had received the com-plaintsand was looking into them butcould not comment on specific cases.BTunderstands MAS isawaiting SGX’sfindings since it is the exchangewhich supervises DMMs.
Meanwhile, an MCS spokesmansaid it had been notified of the com-plaints but could not comment as ithad not received details yet.
Warrants are derivative instru-ments that derive their value from anunderlying asset. Call warrants giveholders the right to buy the asset at a
fixed price within a specified timeframe and so rise when the underly-ing asset rises, while put warrantsgive holders the right to sell the assetat a fixed price within the stated timeperiod and therefore gain value whenthe underlying asset falls.
Structured warrants differ fromcompany-issuedwarrants in that theyare offered by financial institutions(usually banks like MB) when there isdemand for such instruments.
Upon expiry, warrants that are “inthemoney”aresettled incashby issu-ers – that is, calls whose exercise pric-esarebelowtheactualpriceof theun-derlying asset or puts whose exerciseprices are above the market price.
Warrant pricing typically uses anoption pricing formula that incorpo-rates five variables: time to expiry,
the underlying asset’s price, the exer-cise price, the risk-free interest rate,and expected future volatility.
Inordertoensureaprofitablebusi-ness, issuersactivelyhedgetheirposi-tions, usually by buying or selling theappropriatequantityofover-the-coun-ter options or the underlying asset it-self.
In theory, because of their hedg-ing, issuers are directionally neutral,and so are thought to be largely indif-ferent to the direction of the underly-ing asset. However, they are exposedto the volatility of the underlying as-set.So intimesofgreatvolatility, issu-ers face higher hedging costs.
MB is the market leader in the localmarket for HSI structured warrantswith an estimated 90 per cent marketshare.
Crowdfunding comesto S’pore real estate
❚❚ DAILYDIGEST Hang Seng warrants: traders complain
Founder(s)
Targetedinvestors
Types of investments
Usual investment bracket
Usual total quantum
Returns
Location of properties
Business model
Due diligence/authorisation
Tan Kok Keong & Brian Wee
Accredited investors* only
Development andincome-yielding assets
S$50,000 to S$200,000
S$10 million and below
8-20% pa, dependingon asset class anddevelopment stage
Key cities in Asiaand Australia
(Declines to provide)
Requires developers toprovide the necessary duediligence documents forinspection by prospectiveinvestors
CROWDFUNDING
PLATFORMCoAssets FundPlaces DomaCom
Real estate crowdfunding platforms
*Accredited individuals are those whose net personal assets exceed S$2 million (with conditions) or whose income in the preceding 12 months is at least S$300,000. Accredited corporations are those with net assets of more than S$10 million.
Source: Compiled by BT
Getty Goh & Seh Huan Kiat
SME bosses and high net worth individuals (not necessarily accredited)
Mostly development projects
S$10,000 to S$50,000
S$100,000 to S$1.5 million
5-15% pa
South-east Asia and Australia
Success fees (5% of amount raised)AdvertisementsPublicationsEvents
Ensures developers have a Singapore office and local director (who wlll be held liable in a default)Ensures complete documentationOther Acra checks including substantial paid-up capital
Arthur Naoumidis
Financial advisory firms,wealth management firms,private banks (who in turnadvise their accreditedinvestor clients)
Land banks, developmentprojects, completed properties(student accommodation, hotel suites, condotels are most popular)
Australian retail investors: min A$20,000Singapore accredited investors: min S$200,000
Australian retail investors: A$300,000 to A$1 millionSingapore accredited investors: S$1 million to S$30 million
Varies according to property,eg 3-4% rental yield +6-8% capital gains(on disposal) for Australianresidential properties
Australia
Fund management feesof 0.88% pa
Fund is registered with MASin Singapore. In Australia, it isapproved by ASIC and backedby Perpetual Trust Services
In 3 letters to SGX and MAS, they allege Macquarie’s pricing is “unfair” and “erratic”, with warrants often not moving in line with underlying index
TOPLINEDigital, social media consultancy power Weber Shandwick growth
COMPANIES & MARKETS / 4
STI 3,487.39 -25.61
KL COMP 1,818.27 -44.31
NIKKEI 225 19,531.63 -488.41
HANG SENG 28,133.00 +72.02
SHENZHEN B 1,426.32 +29.41
DOW 18,024.06 -56.08
MARKETSWeekly Change
THE REAL DEALUncompromising respect for original Thai cuisine at David Thompson's Long Chim
DINING OUT / 23
ASEAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SCORECARDFull rankings of the 100 largest Singapore-listed companies TOP STORIES / 3
BUSINESS SCHOOLS IN ASIAHow should they position themselves in the global marketplace? VIEWS FROM THE TOP / 10-11
S$1.00 MCI (P) 051/08/2014 Monday, May 4, 2015
☛ Continued from Page 1
Lim Yew Soon, managing director of
Singapore property developer EL De-
velopment,alsoworriesthateasierac-
cess to finance will lead developers to
become less cautious and take higher
development and investment risks,
as opposed to the prudence one
would naturally practise when using
one’s own shareholders’ funds.
Some say that real estate crowd-
funding is not new. DomaCom
Singapore’s managing director Paul
Zaman, for example, calls it just a
modern buzzword for age-old finan-
cial practices: “In stockbroking, this
process is called bookbuilding. And
in property, it’s called syndication.”
EL’s Mr Lim also likened crowd-
funding to some developers’ method
ofgettingfundsfrombusinessassoci-
ates who are not shareholders of the
company. “They are more like angel
investors who put in money to fund
development projects, be it local and
overseas. This has been in place for
years. In return, they take a percent-
age, say 2 per cent, of the project’s
profits.”
Others highlight a slight differ-
ence: syndicates are made up of peo-
ple who know one another quite well,
but in crowdfunding, complete stran-
gers could be pooling their money to-
gether to buy a property.
Real estate crowdfunding also dif-
fers from real estate investment
trusts (Reit), which come with a
non-customisableportfolioofproper-
ties, and private property funds,
which like Reits typically buy big-
ger-ticket assets.
Different crowdfunding platforms
also work differently. Unlike
CoAssets and FundPlaces, DomaCom
Singapore, a unit of Australia’s Doma-
Com, is more like a mutual fund with
many sub-funds, each containing a
property. Investors hold units in
these sub-funds and reap monthly
rentalyieldsand acapitalgainwhen a
property is sold. There is an – though
not yet sizeable – online secondary
market to allow investors to trade
their holdings.
It is essentially a “less clunky and
cumbersome” way of doing syndica-
tion, and there are available exit strat-
egies, said Mr Zaman. The sub-funds
can be terminated with a 75 per cent
unitholder vote, or a 50 per cent vote
after five years.
DomaCom opened its one-man of-
fice in Singapore last November. Its
fund is registered with the MAS.
In Australia, it is approved by the
Australian Securities and Invest-
ments Commission and backed by
Perpetual Trust Services. It hopes to
list in Australia in the next couple of
years to improve its credibility.
The one commonality that runs
through all three crowdfunding plat-
forms seems to be the location of
theirprojects inAustralia;andtheoth-
er, the conspicuous absence of any
Singapore projects.
There is a reason for this: the dif-
ferent payment methods for develop-
ers in both jurisdictions, explained
Brian Wee, CEO and co-founder of
FundPlaces.
Developers of Australian proper-
ties only get their sales proceeds
when their projects are completed,
whichmeanstheyhavetofundtheen-
tire project through bank loans, equi-
ty, and mezzanine financing. The
kind of “loans” FundPlaces facilitates
falls under mezzanine financing, and
frees upsome of the developers’ capi-
tal toacquirenewsitesor takeupnew
projects.
At as high as 20 per cent, the inter-
est ratesarehefty though. Incompari-
son, Australia’s banks are lending at
4-4.75percent for loan-to-value (LTV)
ratios of 50-60 per cent for five-year
maturities. Five-year corporate bonds
yield about 3-4 per cent.
Conversely, crowdfunding is less
necessary for Singapore projects be-
cause the initial downpayment and
subsequent progressive payments
are usually enough to fund construc-
tion. It is the land purchase that re-
quires loans, but crowdfunding plat-
forms are unable to raise large
enough an amount. Their funding
quantum is capped at S$10 million.
Is it going to be a disruptive tech-
nologytocommercial lending?Found-
ers of crowdfunding platforms here
say it is complementary, rather.
Ensuring that developers have
first obtained bank lending before
they are allowed to crowdfund gives
FundPlaces some certainty of the
developer’s credit-worthiness, said
Mr Wee.
CoAssets, which facilitates S$1-5
million loans to boutique developers
looking to do small regional projects,
said crowdfunding bridges a funding
gap where it might be difficult for
these developers to get bank loans.
“But when they have built a track
record, they can subsequently go to
banks,” CEO Getty Goh pointed out.
By Rob Curran
A FLAT April continued the US stock
market tale for the year: full of sound
and fury, signifying nothing.
Stock prices flew hither and yon
on most sessions last week as they
have on many sessions this year. And
yet for the week, the month and the
year, the major indexes finished
more or less flat. The skittishness
about the Federal Reserve’s plans and
the global economy is likely to keep
the action lively and directionless for
another week.
The Nasdaq Composite had closed
theprior weekat anall-timehigh, sur-
passing the dotcom peak that had
long seemed unassailable. This time
around, the technology stocks that
make up the bulk of the index – such
as Apple, Google and Facebook – are
highly profitable. But, as traders dis-
coveredlastweek,anothersignificant
sector in the index may have formed
a speculative bubble comparable to
thatof theearly-stage Internetcompa-
nies that proliferated in the year
2000.
Like the dotcoms, many small bio-
technology companies have yet to
turn a profit or even release a prod-
uct. Like the dotcoms, biotech shares
often gain several percent a day for
no reason other than the fact that day
traders like to gamble on them. Like
thedotcoms, thecompaniesoccasion-
ally tap intohighlyprofitable markets
– inthiscasediscoveringcures fordis-
eases rather than novel ways to con-
duct shopping. But, as with the dot-
coms, the vast majority of small bio-
techs never make it into the green.
Last week, the ProShares Ultra Bio-
technologyFund,an exchange-traded
fund designed to double the return of
an index of biotech stocks, fell 11 per
cent and at one stage had given back
half of its 40 per cent gains on the
year. One biotech company, Cella-
don, saw shares fall almost 80 per
cent on Monday after it warned that a
promising drug candidate performed
poorly in a clinical trial.
The immediate impetus for the
sell-off was shifting odds on the Fed-
eral Reserve’s interest-rate schedule.
The Fed’s Wednesday statement was
ambiguous on the timing of a hike,
and markets initially interpreted it as
a tacit postponement.
“They talked about wanting to do
itsometimethisyear . . .maybe,com-
paredto latesummer,early fall guide-
line, which people were whispering
about,” said Oliver Pursche, president
of Gary Goldberg Financial Services.
“It’s pretty clear from the state-
ment that nothing will happen before
September.”
On balance, the Fed’s comments
about the “transitory” nature of weak-
ness in US economic data sounded, at
least to some, more like a guarantee
of a hike by the end of the year.
Biotech stocks and utility stocks
were two of the best performing sec-
tors of the last 18 months, largely be-
cause the Fed’s ultra-low interest-rate
policy has driven investors out of the
bond market into these niches. Reti-
rees who sought to live off interest
payments or “fixed income” migrated
to the utility sector. Free range hedge
fundswhichhadusedborrowedmon-
ey to make leveraged bets in junk
bonds or emerging-market stocks
found better odds in the biotech
niche.
More broadly, an uneven earnings
seasonhasmadestocks jumpy.While
the vast majority of Standard & Poor’s
500 companies surpassed the mod-
est expectations for earnings, most
fell short of revenue expectations,
said Joe Kinahan, chief derivatives
strategist at TD Ameritrade. The cul-
prits: oil and the dollar.
Oil companies from ExxonMobil to
Britain’sBP, to France’sTotal, saw rev-
enue plunge, reflecting the roughly
50 per cent drop in oil futures during
the quarter.
Meanwhile, multinationals from
social network Facebook to elec-
tric-power outfitter Eaton said that
the stronger dollar diluted the value
of earnings
“Markets bounced around on earn-
ings,” said Eric Marshall, portfolio
managerwithmutual-fundfirmHodg-
es Capital in Dallas. “When you look
through the currency noise, and
some volatility seen on West coast
port disruption, overall earnings sea-
son has come in pretty solid.”
Another stock-market trend that
hangs in the balance: the resurgence
in the price of small-capitalisation
stocks. These companies are consid-
eredthemostsensitivetotheUSecon-
omy and had led the bull market until
2014. As growth slowed, so did the
small-cap rally. When the dollar took
flight against other currencies this
year, however, it didn’t hurt small
companies as much as it did the big
ones.
“You’ve seen the multinationals
face greater headwinds in the first
quarter than the smaller domestic
centric companies,” said Mr Marshall
of Hodges Capital.
For the dollar rally to continue in
foreign-exchange markets and the
small caps to recoup last week’s loss-
es, the jobs report on Friday will have
toexceedexpectationsofastatusquo
report. If more than the economists’
average target of 230,000 jobs were
addedinApril, theFedwill almostcer-
tainly raise rates by December. In that
event, traderscouldpunish the utility
and biotech sectors further. But small
caps and other economically sensi-
tive niches such as big banks should
carry the market higher.
“The Friday report is crucial be-
cause it’s part of what the Fed is look-
ingforbefore theyembarkonnormal-
isation of rates,” said Quincy Krosby,
market strategist at Prudential Finan-
cial.
“They want to make sure the econ-
omy is on a solid footing.”
By Lee U-Wen
@LeeUwenBT
Singapore
THE Singapore government is said to
have decided on which of three possi-
ble locations to site the Republic’s ter-
minal station for the proposed high-
speed rail link with Malaysia. An an-
nouncement is expected when the
two countries’ leaders meet here this
week.
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Ra-
zak, who is due for a two-day visit,
will have a retreat with Prime Minister
Lee Hsien Loong on Tuesday.
At a joint press conference after
their meeting, Mr Lee is likely to re-
veal where Singapore intends to build
its terminal station, having an-
nounced last year that there were
threeoptions:TuasWest, JurongEast,
and the city centre.
Malaysia has already confirmed
that its terminal will be in Bandar Ma-
laysia, about 5km from the landmark
Petronas Twin Towers in the heart of
the country’s capital Kuala Lumpur.
The Bandar Malaysia project is a
planned 200-hectare mixed develop-
ment that will sit on land in an exist-
ing military airbase in Sungai Besi.
The plan is to complete the mam-
moth rail project, estimated at
320-340km long, by 2020. Some
sources, however, told The Business
Times that it could bust that deadline
by two years.
Once the train service starts, pas-
sengers will be able to travel between
Singapore and KL in just 90 minutes,
compared to about 4-5 hours by car.
At the previous retreat in Putra-
jaya last year, the two prime minis-
ters also said that their countries
were exploring a new initiative: a sin-
gle border checkpoint with both Sin-
gapore and Malaysia housing their
Customs, Immigration and Quaran-
tine (CIQ) complexes at one location.
Mr Lee’s lastmeeting with Mr Najib
was a week ago in KL and Langkawi,
whenMalaysiahostedtheAseanSum-
mit meetings.
At the opening of the new chan-
cery of the Singapore High Commis-
sion in KL, Mr Lee said: “If we can get
the high-speed rail going and run-
ning, this will be a very important
projectwhichwill fostercloser tiesbe-
tweenourpeoples.Thenwecancome
up, have lunch, and go back down to
Singapore again.”
Singapore-Malaysia bilateral links
arestrong,andthiswillbethesixthre-
treat between Mr Lee and Mr Najib
since their first one back in 2007.
According to a statement from
Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Af-
fairs on Sunday, the annual retreat is
a “key bilateral platform” for the
prime ministers to drive relations for-
ward.
Mr Najib will be in Singapore to-
gether with his wife Rosmah Mansor
and a high-level delegation compris-
ingmanymembers ofhisCabinetand
senior officials.
Mr Lee’s team of ministers will in-
clude Deputy Prime Minister and
Home Affairs Minister Teo Chee
Hean.
The Singapore leader will host a
private dinner for Mr Najib and their
wives on Monday evening. The re-
treat proper begins on Tuesday, with
the prime ministers and their delega-
tions meeting for bilateral discus-
sions on various issues.
After the retreat, Mr Najib is due to
deliverthekeynoteaddressat theEco-
nomic Society of Singapore’s annual
dinner at Shangri-la Hotel, an event
that Mr Lee will also attend along with
many policymakers, economists,
business leaders and academics.
This visit will be Mr Najib’s second
toSingapore in sixweeks. He was pre-
viously here in late March to pay his
respects to the late founding prime
minister Lee Kuan Yew at Parliament
House.
Crowdfunding comes to S’pore real estate
WALL STREET INSIGHT
Flat April continues market’s tale;all eyes on Friday’s jobs report
Najib in Singapore for leaders’ retreat
Mr Najib and Mr Lee at the Singapore Sports Hub last August. Aiming tofoster warmer bilateral relations, their meeting this week will be theirsixth retreat since their first one back in 2007. ST FILE PHOTO
PM Lee expected to announce Singapore terminal location for high-speed rail link to KL
Stock prices flewhither and yon onmost sessions lastweek as they have onmany sessions thisyear . . . Theskittishness about theFederal Reserve’s plansand the globaleconomy is likely tokeep the action livelyand directionless foranother week.
2 | TOP STORIESThe Business Times | Monday, May 4, 2015