69
D-19 61 STRESS RELATED FAILURES CAUSING OEN NTALIZTION(U) /1 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC DALLAS SEMICONDUCTOR GROUP S K GROOTHUIS JAN 88 RADC-RR-88-8 F36602-85-C-8093 UNCLASSIFIED F/G U/3 ElllllElhEliI / I l5llEDG E EE EIEEEEEEEEEEEE IlEEEEghhlgEEE

D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

D-19 61 STRESS RELATED FAILURES CAUSING OEN NTALIZTION(U) /1

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC DALLAS SEMICONDUCTOR GROUPS K GROOTHUIS JAN 88 RADC-RR-88-8 F36602-85-C-8093

UNCLASSIFIED F/G U/3ElllllElhEliI/ I l5llEDG E

EEEIEEEEEEEEEEEEIlEEEEghhlgEEE

Page 2: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

~11II _ .IIw

J . IIIII t4 ..111IcuuUj 11

O P' I I. .-

Page 3: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

co RADC-TR-88-8 ;0o) Final Technical Report4

January 1988

In

STRESS RELATED FAILURES CAUSINGOPEN METALLIZATION

Texas Instruments Incorporated

Steven K. Groothuls D7T1CrE~LIECTE

MAY 1 Nigw.

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

ROME AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER :Air Force Systems Command

Griftiss Air Force Base, NY 13441-5700

~ 88 8 16 0 9

Page 4: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

.4. ."

"-.

This report has been reviewed by the RADC Public Affairs Office (PA) andis releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). At NTISit will be releasable to the general public, including foreign nations.

RADC-TR-88-8 has been reviewed and is approved for publication.

7 - * - 1°

APPROVED:

MARTIN J. WALTERProject Engineer

. -4

* ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1

JOHN J. BART . -. -

Technical DirectorDirectorate of Reliability & Compatibility

FOR THE COMMANDER:

JOHN A. RITZ

Directorate of Plans & Programs

If your address has changed or if you wish to be removed from the RADC mailinglist, or if the addressee is no longer employed by your organization, pleasenotify RADC (RBRP) Griffiss AFB NY 13441-5700. This will assist us in main-taining a current mailing list.

Do not return copies of this report unless contractual obligations or noticeon a specific document requires that it be returned.

...... .................. .... .........-. ,. t] ,~ m, . .L,,m, , ... _- S. .], . ,.,

-. . . .. . . . . . .. -. .. -. .-.- •- - . ,,g - . - ,

Page 5: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

I Form ApprovedREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0 1"

la REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS

UNCLASSIFIED N/A

2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF REPORTN/A Approved for public release; distribution

2b DECLASSIFICATION /DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE unlimited.

N/A4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5 MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)N/A RADC-TR-88-8

6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION

Texas Instruments Incorporatel (If applicable) Rome Air Development Center (RBRP)

6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIPCode) 7b ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code)Semiconductor GroupP.O. Box 655012, M/S477 Griffiss AFB NY 13441-5700Dallas TX 75265

8a. NAME OF FUNDING /SPONSORING 8b OFFICE SYMBOL 9 PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERORGANIZATION (If applicable) F30602-85-C-0093

Rome Air Development Center RBRP F6 -- 0

8c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS

PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNITGriffiss AFB NY 13441-5700 ELEMENT NO NO. NO ACCESSION NO

62702F 2338 01 5K11 TITLE (Include Security Classification)

STRESS RELATED FAILURES CAUSING OPEN METALLIZATION

12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) h

Steven K. Groothuis13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b TIME COVERED 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 15. PAGE COUNT

Final FROM Jun 85 TOJul 87 January 1988 80016. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION %N/A

17. COSATI CODES 18. SU CT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)FIELD GROUP SUB-GROUP Modeling Thin Films

0 12 Stress, Voids ,Finite Element Analysis I Conductors 1.

ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)

Non-linear Finite Element Analysis has been used to model stresses and infer stressinduced void formation in narrow Al-S; metal lines. Observed failures correlate well

with calculated stresses determined by varying intrinsic stress of the passivation,topography, line width and silicon nodule size. /

20 DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION[ UNCLASSIFIED'UNLIMITED El SAME AS RPT C] DTIC USERS UNCLASSIFIED

22a NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b TELEPHONE (include Area Code) I22c OFFICE SYMBOLMartin J. Walter (315) 330-4t9 l RD (BP

D Form 1473, JUN 86 Previous editions are obsolete SECURITY CLASSIFICAT N OF THIS PAGE

UNCLASSIFIED

* W'k2FAI~ % % * *~., ~ ,~ -**

Page 6: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

UNCLASSIFIED

IIwUNCLASIFIE

Page 7: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

EVALUATION

This contract resulted from a Program Research and Develop-ment Announcement on Failure Mechanisms in VLSI. Texas

Instruments investigated the role of stresses in thin metalconductors by use of finite element analysis. The programs I.Iused for this analysis were already in existence at TI andsimilar programs are available commercially. This work hasbeen pioneering in the area of thin film conductor reliabil-ity, and has been published in the Proceedings of the 1987International Reliability Physics Symposium. Similar workwas being conducted at INMOS, and was also reported in thesame Proceedings.

The report addresses the effects of topography and materialproperties on stresses within an Al-Si conductor film.There is a good correlation between the calculated maximumstress as a function of linewidth and the density of voids %

as a function of linewidth reported in the 1985 IRPS. Thesecalculations do not address the evolution of void growth, orsilicon precipitate growth. They are a method of evaluatingthe initial driving forces present, and how those forces aremodified by topology and macroscopic material properties.Areas which remain to be investigated include the metalspacing, the height of a step, corners, and interactionsbetween combinations of these effects. N

MARTIN . TER ACC: r7Y _

Project E neer CNYS c&P-Ti~. TA;J

* 0

*N %

l:

. . . ...- 'A % -

..... .. _,.. . . *

A. 1%

*'%.

:-S6,:- :

Page 8: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

-- - - - - -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sect ion Title Pagre

1.0 BACKGROUND. ........... ........ 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION. ................ 3

3.0 THERMOMECHANICAL STRESS THEORY .. ...... 7

3.1 Stress and vacancyconcentration .............10

3.2 Stress enhanced vacancydiffusion ............... 11

4.0 MODELING RESULTS ............... 15

4.1 Finite element modelingfundamentals.............15

4.2 Application of finite elementmodeling ..... ............16

4.3 Effects of underlying oxidelayer ................. 19

4.4 Linewidth dependence ofstress................19

4.5 Compressive stress passivation*layer ................. 27

4.6 Silicon nodules. ............28

4.7 Metallization parameters ........ 34

4.7.1 Metal line topography . . . 34

* 4.7.2 Variations in metalthickness ...........34

4.7.3 Metallization yieldstrength variations . . . . 40

* <

Page 9: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued)

section Title Pag~e

4.7.4 Metal line slant angle . . . 40

4.8 Aluminum-copper metal systems . . . 40

4.9 Three dimensional effects........40

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............49 -

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.................53

REFERENCES.....................55

APPENDIX -- STRESS CALCULATIONS . . . . 59

ivi

Itz-V

law1

Page 10: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

6i

APPENDIX

STRESS CALCULATIONS

1.0 GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS

The physical stress model of a passivated AI-Simetal line is representative of single level

interconnect systems in current integrated circuits.Line widths from 1 to 10 microns were investigated fora typical system of a 1 micron Al-Si line on a 0.5micron thick layer of silicon dioxide over a silicon...+w

wafer with 1 micron of compressive silicon nitridepassivation.

1.1 Temperature boundary conditions

The temperature at which every material was atzero stress was assumed to be 400 degrees C. To afirst order approximation, this assumption is believedto be valid. Additional features which can lead to amore accurate model would be thermal stress history ofthe metallization (i.e., annealing, any hightemperature excursion, gold eutectic die attach, etc.).The stresses were then investigated as a function ofcooling down to 25 degrees C.

1.2 Material properties

The material properties used for the analysis arelisted in Table A-1 and are fairly representative ofliterature values. This table has evolved from several Y.-l.sources and a similar finite element stress modelingstudy performed by Jones [10]. The room temperatureyield strength of the Al-Si metallization was modeledto be approximately 100 MPascals. The characteristicstress distribution calculated during this project isexpected not to vary significantly with materialvariations. ,

1.3 Analysis tools

The nonlinear finite element software (ADINA) usedfor this analysis was selected for its general purposeelastic-plastic features of material properties as afunction of thermal loads. Several other finite elementmodeling codes do exist which perform in the same Smanner.

59

Z~~. . ..

Page 11: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

.

TABLE A-I. TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT MATERIAL PROPERTIES we"

--------- -----------------------------------------------------------------

TEMPERATURE (DEGREE C)MATERIAL

25 100 200 300 400-+------------------------------------------------------

PROPERTY : MODULUS OF ELASTICITY (GPascals)-----------------------------------------------------------------------Al-Si 69 68 62 49 40Silicon 130 130 130 130 130Si3N4 90 90 90 90 90SiO2 80 80 80 80 80 ww

------- -------+------------------------------------------------------PROPERTY : THERMAL COEF. OF EXPANSION (ppm/deg C)

---- ------------------------------------------------------Al-Si 24.0 24.0 26.0 29.0 30.0Silicon 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.8 4.0Si3N4 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.1 4.3'Si02 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.7

-+------------------------------------------------------PROPERTY : YIELD STRENGTH (MPascals)

------------------------------------------------------------------------Al-Si I 100 100 70 30 15

------------------------------------------------------------------------

60 .

5.J

,,,0

• 0

,L.'<ww , ,,,l '..", ". w%...-..-. .t'7,[%- . .- %- " - " . . ' %',%"% %"-" ."'.''.'','-."".'%'_w'_.' %..'5, ',,:..% ,%'.. 2--%.'. .".i'.D'.. 5,.J

Page 12: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

LIST OF FIGURESFigure No. Title Pa e

1. Metal voids observed in narrow Al-Siinterconnects (SEM, after passivationremoval) ..... ............... . . .... 4

2. Half of cross sectional area restrictedby metal void (SEM, after passivation 5removal) ....... ................... 5

3. Schematic of vacancy flow within a grainexperiencing tensile stress . . . ..... 9

4. Finite element mesh describing stressmodel geometry ..... ............... ... 18

5. Von Mises stress contour plot for 1micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa) ..... ............... .20

6. Von Mises stress contour plot for 2micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa) ..... ............... .. 21

7. Von Mises stress contour plot for 3micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa) ..... ............... .. 22

8. Von Mises stress contour plot for 5 ,..-micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa) ..... ............... .. 23

9. Von Mises stress contour plot for 10micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa) . ... .... .. ... . 24evr O~).....................2

10. Typical location for maximum von Mises* stress in Al-Si metallization (contours

at every 50 MPa) ..... .............. .. 25

11. Comparison of theoretical stress ,...modeling values to experimentalobservations2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 -

V. 1..

v '.

S•

5. S

Page 13: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

LIST OF FIGURES(Continued)

Figure No. Title Page 0-A

12. Maximum tensile stress contour plot for

5 micron wide Al-Si metal with presence 'of a silicon nodule (contours at every50 MPa) ........ .................. .29

S13. Proximity effect of silicon nodule and

metal void formation (SEM, partiallyetched metallization) ... ........... ... 30

14. Induced Stress for Several Silicon k-%Nodule Sizes (contours at every 50 MPa) . 32

15. Maximum Tensile and Von Mises Stress asa Function of Silicon Nodule Size-to-Linewidth Ratio ..... .............. ... 33 0

16. Maximum principal stress contour plotfor Al-Si metal traversing over 1 micronoxide step (contours at every 50 MPa). . . 35

17a. Von Mises stress contour plot for 3micron wide Al-Si metal on flat surface(contours at every 50 MPa) ........... ... 36

17b. Von Mises stress contour plot for Al-Simetal traversing over 1 micron oxidestep (contours at every 50 MPa) ........ .36

18. Metal voids observed in narrow Al-Siinterconnects at oxide step (SEM, afterpassivation removal) .... ............ .37

19. Metal void formation adjacent to oxidestep (SEM, after passivation removal). . 38

20. Maximum Von Mises Stress as a Functionof Several Linewidths and Thicknesses. 39

21. Induced Stress for Several YieldStrengths of Al-Si Metallization (von N

Mises Stress) (contours at every 50MPa) ......... .................... . 41

vi

Page 14: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

LIST OF FIGURES(Continued)

Figure No. Title Page S

22. Maximum Von Mises Stress as a Functionof Metal Yield Strength (for a 3 micronwide metal line) ..... .............. 42

23. Induced Stress for Several Slant Angles 0of Al-Si Metallization Edge (contours

A at every 50 MPa) ..... .............. 43

24. Three Dimensional View of MetallizationStress ......... ................... 45

25. Three Dimensional View of MetallizationStress Over an Oxide Step ... ......... .46

*~vii

P I.....,

SV

-, 0%

.S+:

Page 15: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

,.I

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. T Pacte

1. Typical Material Properties ..... ........ 7

A-i. Temperature-dependent MaterialProperties . ........ . ...... 60

00

. . .. . . .

q

* viii *%

Page 16: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by Air Force SystemsCommand, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AirForce Base, New York under Contract No. F30602-85-C-0093. The authors gratefully acknowledge JoeMcPherson, Clyde Dunn, and P.B. Ghate of TexasInstruments for their experimental data anddiscussions.

We also acknowledge Martin Walter of RADC for histechnical support throughout the program.

ix

%. .J.

Page 17: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

1.0 BACKGROUND

With the ever increasing number of metallizationfailures caused by voids and subsequent opens, thereliability of narrow Al-Si metal lines has become acrucial factor in very large scale integration (VLSI)device fabrication and assembly. The only supportingevidence for void formation in the recent past has beenvisual inspection of failed open metallization. Theopen metallization failure rate increases as thepassivation thickness increases, the metal line becomesnarrower and thinner, and as the mean grain size of themetallization increases.

When thin film metallizations are stressed by anamount smaller than the elastic limit, they deformelastically and return to their original shape afterthe stress is relieved. However, when the stress isbeyond the elastic limit, the films deform plasticallyand do not return to the original shape after thestress is relieved. The plastic deformation usuallydeteriorates the mechanical properties of the thinfilms. It is that plastic deformation that is theprimary cause of void formation in compressivelypassivated Al-Si metallization.

Stress-induced void formation can be modeled usingnonlinear finite element analysis. Theoreticallycalculated stresses have correlated well with observed 0failures. The stresses modeled during this contractwere a function of varying intrinsic stress ofpassivation layers, metallization topography, linewidth, and silicon nodule size.

I

,I.,

Page 18: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

2.0 INTRODUCTION" ' 4

The purpose of this work is to determine the ,.-,..-

stress distribution and the probability of voidformation in Al-Si metallization through the use of Sfinite element modeling (FEM). Although all parameterswhich constitute the actual --tress in the metallizationhave not been used, the characteristics of the stressdistribution in the metallization lend a simplephysical interpretation of the void formationmechanism. The variables used are as follows

(1) Al-Si line widths(2) Magnitude of compressive stress

in passivation layer(3) Presence of silicon nodules(4) Metal line topography

Formation of voids within Al-Si metallization hasbeen reported after passivation deposition [1,2], hightemperature IC fabrication processes [3], and agingtests [4,5]. The associated reliability implicationsof metal void and silicon nodule formation are asfollows : significant reduction in net metal linecross-sectional area, rise in local current density,and thereby increased probability of failure due toelectromigration or localized heating, and loss ofcontinuity due to subsequent microscopic cracks in themetal line. Two typical types of voids can be seen inFigures 1 and 2.

Several factors which influence the void formation

and are relatively difficult to model will not bereported in this paper. These factors include theaddition of small percentage of copper to the Al-Sialloy [1], infrared radiation of passivation [6],nitrogen content (7], and grain size / orientation[8,9].3

- •.

e7

I _%%%

Page 19: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

4.

0

.~.. 4~

~A

S

4

A

0

* S.-' S.

5-'-p -~*~S.

.5,. ..5*5%

.4-

4 ~AS.

4

*S

S.-

Figure 1. Metal voids observed in narrow Al-Siinterconnects (SEM, after passivationremoval)

S..5'

0

4

5.44

0 * 5.44

*4 *%

Page 20: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

% %

010

0S

,etional* retice

(Spt4 er pa si at o

'Hal Of c os e f

Figue bymeta voi

reoa)

5-A-

Page 21: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

3.0 THERMOMECHANICAL STRESS THEORY

The thermal coefficient of expansion mismatchbetween aluminum-silicon metallization, silicon nitridepassivation, silicon dioxide dielectric, and siliconsubstrate induces a significantly large tensile stress 'within the metallization after a decrease intemperature ( from passivation deposition to roomtemperature ). Typical material properties used forthe stress modeling are shown in Table 1. Severalother properties are necessary for finite elementstress modeling - Poisson's ratio, shear modulus,plastic modulus, yield strength, and creep rates.These properties are explained further in the Appendix.

TABLE 1. Typical Material Properties. 4-

+------------------------+------------------------------------MODULUS OF THERMAL COEF.ELASTICITY OF EXPANSION(GPascals) (ppm/deg C) 1>

+- - ------------- -------------------------- +SILICON SUBSTRATE 131.0 2.3 0AL-SI METALLIZATION 70.3 23.5SILICON NITRIDE 89.6 2.2SILICON DIOXIDE 79.9 0.5

+---------------------+----------------+---------------------All material properties shown are at 250 Cfor simplicity purposes.

----------------------------------------------------

If the tensile stress rises above the yield stressof the metallization, any additional stress will berelieved by vacancy creation and clustering ( i.e.,

0 void formation ). It appears that once voids andsilicon nodules are formed due to thermal stress, themetallization may fail due to a creep mechanism. '"

70

7 N

.* .*%* ~ -%

Page 22: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

Thin film Al-Si metal)ization yields at stressesless than 100 MPascals ( depending microstructure andtemperature ) The von Mises failure theory can beapplied to predict the yielding criterion [10] of themetal line at relatively low yield stresses. Theeffective von Mises stress is a scalar value based onall components of the stress tensor. It is alsoproportional to the square root of the distortionenergy of the material in question. It can bemathematically expressed as follows:

S (o - a) 2 +(o -a) +(o )2 + 6(, 2 + t 2 +Off V'2 2 Y Y a +a

o = principal stresses along each coordinate --%axis %

= respective shear stresses IF%

II

This failure criterion determines the distortion energyavailable to activate the diffusion creep and indicatethe degree of plastic deformation in the metallization.

In cases where formation of a vacancy at a sourcecauses polycrystalline thin films to expand in thedirection of an applied tensile stress, the energy of .vacancy formation is decreased by the work done by thestress [11]. A schematic of vacancy flow within agrain experiencing tensile stress is shown in Figure 3.

le %

. e

WAN....

8

- p.-.orNI % %

Page 23: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

0 +0

-14*. pi

,,,/ 7" A

< Fgur 3. cheati of acacy fow ithn a rai .

exeriecingtenile tres. -

__.1*

-U +0

'p.

,' -

Page 24: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

Under these conditions, vacancies flow betweendifferent sources and sinks, producing diffusionalcreep and subsequent voids. Using the Hall-Petchrelationship, the strength of the metal line is aninverse of the grain size. If the metal line issubjected to a critical stress gradient, some net massflow will occur in a direction to relieve the stress.Since the grain boundaries have the highest density of :vacancies, migration along the grain boundaries iscertainly the most rapid.

3.1 Stress and vacancy concentration

As pointed out in several Al-Si metallizationstudies [9], metals with a fine grain size can bedeformed by the processes of vacancy ( diffusion )creep. This can be by lattice diffusion of vacancies (Nabarro-Herring creep ), or by grain boundary diffusion( Coble creep ).

Two types of voids have been observed in therecent past [12]. One is the slit-like void which isvery thin gap perpendicular to the Al-Si line edge. %This type of void is the most catastrophic duringfailure analysis of open metallization. The other typeof void is wedge-shaped which is formed along the grainboundaries at the edge of the metal lines. This voidtype is the result of grain boundary diffusion, whereasthe slit-like void is mainly the result of lattice 0diffusion.

In either case a higher than normal concentrationof vacancies occurs at grain boundaries transverse to atensile stress, and a lower than normal concentrationat longitudinal boundaries. This concentrationgradient leads to a flow of vacancies from thetransverse to the longitudinal boundaries causing anopposite of atoms that creates the tensile strain inthe direction of the stress.

0

10 ."

'W vN N" 'I.

Page 25: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

0 w7 W, K

The gradient of vacancy concentration as a resultof a tensile stress is as follows:

2 c(T) b3 (C --- -- -- - (2)

d kT

= concentration gradientca= vacancy concentration (function of T)d = grain size S

' = stressb = Burgers vectork = Boltzmann's constantT = absolute temperature

This equation yielded a Nabarro-Herring creep rate10-5 sec - ) with experimentally derived values [9]

for low stress conditions ( 100 MPascals).

3.2 Stress enhanced vacancy diffusion

The diffusional creep has two major components:(1) Nabarro-Herring creep ( deformation by the flow ofions through the grains ) and Coble creep ( deformationby ion flow in the grain boundaries ). The twodiffusion paths contribute in an additive sense to thestrain rate as shown in the following equation:

5 Dv O Dgb .1+ (3)

d2 kT 6 Dv

= diffusional creep rate= stress in metallization

d = grain size3 = grain boundary widthDv = lattice diffusion coefficientDb = boundary diffusion coefficientQ = atomic volume

This equation is actually an oversimplification;it neglects the kinetics involved in detachingvacancies from grain boundary sites and reattachingthem again, which may be important under certainconditions. Such behavior can become important inalloys, particularly those containing a finelydispersed second phase.

11 .-.-.

> PP

Page 26: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

A An isolated metal grain on a silicon substratewould deform to relieve thermal expansion induced Istress. Since all the grains of a thin metal film areconnected together, a grain boundary normal stress is

generated. The grain boundary normal stress can berelieved through grain boundary migration. Metal atoms .migrate from grain boundaries parallel to the stressand collect on grain boundaries normal to the stressaxis. This movement relieves the stress at grain Iboundaries, but contributes very little to relievingthe stress within individual grains.

In an unpassivated film, the edges of the line actas vacancy sinks. However, once the aluminum film ispassivated with a dielectric, vacancies are trappedbeneath the passivation. If these vacancies collect inone location, they will form a void. Such voids arethe initial step in the formation of openmetallization. Voids in a metal line locally weaken

% the line by developing a stress concentration around- the void. At temperatures below 100 degrees C, plastic* deformation is the only possible stress relief

mechanism based on experimental findings. With severestress gradients near a void, maximum deformation willbe in the vicinity of the void. If the metal line isthen subjected to subsequent temperature cycles belowthe recrystallization temperature of the metal, themetal around the void will become locally work-hardenedand eventually break.

Under conditions of biaxial stress, characterizingdiffusion is considerably more complex than uniaxialstress. In cases where the formation of a vacancy at asource causes polycrystalline thin films to expand inthe direction of an applied tensile stress, the energyof vacancy formation is decreased by the work done bythe stress; the equilibrium vacancy concentration iscorrespondingly increased.

S... In the case of hydrostatic pressure (imposed by acompressive passivation layer), a decrease in the self-diffusion rate along grain boundaries may result, butbiaxial stresses in the metal film will causeintragranular vacancy diffusion to occur fromboundaries in tension to boundaries in compression.

*All stress modeling results have indicated that theredoes exist a characteristic biaxial stress at the upper

12

%~ ~ Fl. 'A*~. S

Page 27: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

corner and along the edge of the aluminum line.

Stress relaxation can take place through a numberof mechanisms [13], but diffusional creep in the bulk *or grain boundaries is the overriding mechanism forvoid formation. It follows that the stress relaxationmechanism depends strongly on the film depositiontechnique (grain size, texture, interfacial structure)and conditions (defects and composition).

13.

% % %-% '6%

J% -PV

Page 28: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

4.0 MODELING RESULTS

Based on the thermomechanical theory andexperimental observations, the numerical analysistechnique of finite element analysis is used to 0

simulate thermally-induced stresses in a localizedmodel of passivation, metallization, oxide, and siliconlayers. Appropriate boundary conditions allowed a . •localized analysis of the structure within 10 micronsof the chip surface.

4.1 Finite element modeling fundamentals

The concept of finite element stress modeling is

that a boundary-value problem can be broken down into afinite number of regions. Since the method may beapplied to individual discrete elements of thecontinuum, each element may be given distinct physicaland material properties. This approach allows one toachieve very general descriptions of the continuum.

The initial step in performing an elastic-plastic -analysis is to select a yield criterion. The criteriondefines how the materials respond to applied loads.The Al-Si metallization material data is assumed toobey the von Mises distortion energy theory [14].

The next step is to define a plastic-flow rule(i.e., plastic stress-strain relation). The plastic-flow rule defines how individual components of plasticstrain depend on the stress components and temperaturehistories. In this program, the plastic strainincrement is assumed to follow the Normality principleof plasticity [15].

Due to lack of supportable material data for Al-Simetallization, the validation of the foregoingassumptions applied to the metallization is unknown.However, this set of assumptions has been proved towork well for metals used in bulk form.

The final step in performing an elastic-plastic -, .

analysis is to solve a system of simultaneous nonlinearequations [16]. Since the plastic strain depends onthe state of stress and the history of the thermalloading, the response calculation is effectivelydetermined using a step by step incremental analysis.For each temperature increment, an equilibrium

, ..

15

N NS.. .. .".. . . . . .

~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page 29: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

condition is achieved by an iterative technique.

4.2 Application of finite element modeling

Void generation in Al-Si metallization has beenobserved as a result of thermomechanical stressesinduced after deposition of a highly compressivepassivation. In order to explain the observedexperimental results, a model was developed tocalculate stresses in Al-Si metallization with variouswidths (1-10 microns), over oxide topography, with .silicon nodules, and various magnitudes of compressivepassivation stresses (400-1000 MPa).

Stress induced in an Al-Si metal line is afunction of (1) parameters of passivation deposition,(2) thermal coefficient of expansion of each material,(3) form factors of the multilayered structure, and (4)the intrinsic stress of each thin film structure.

The stresses in the multilayered structure arebased on the following assumptions: (1) each layeradheres perfectly to adjacent layers, (2) both thermaland intrinsic stress values were essential for stress ,.

*simulation, and (3) the thermal stress is calculatedfrom a zero stress state at passivation deposition to Wroom temperature.

An analytical approach for the calculation of thestress values during cooling after passivationdeposition is not appropriate because of the materialnonlinearities due to temperature-dependent plasticityand creep. The finite element method is a useful tool,especially for structures with more complicatedgeometry. In this stress analysis, the material modelis described to be isotropic, homogeneous, and thermo-elastic-plastic in nature. All material properties aretemperature-dependent; Young's modulus, E, Poisson'sratio,V , material yield stress, 60y, strain hardeningmodulus for linear strain hardening, ET, theinstantaneous coefficient of thermal expansion, c . .Since the plastic stress in the metallization is apower function of the plastic strain, a roughapproximation for the strain hardening modulus, ET, wasused for each temperature increment.

160 0

- - -

ON 44%S

Page 30: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

OWN=

The essence of this material model is that

constitutive law for an isotropic, thermo-elastic-plastic material will be formulated as follows:

CE ( e T E p E th) (4)

0 = stress in metallization "- *'

CE = component of elastic constitutivetensor defined by Young's modulusand Poisson's ratio r..

ET = total strain componentE = plastic strain componente th = thermal strain component

Using Equation 4, the stress in the metallizationcan be calculated as a function of temperature, :.geometry, and material property variations.

In the stress model, it is assumed that the 1 &metallization possesses nonlinear material properties(plasticity, creep, etc.), and stress values areobtained using the finite element modeling programADINA and analytical solutions under planestrain/stress conditions. The finite element meshdescribing the geometry of the stress model is shown inFigure 4.

The potential for the usage of several creep lawsdoes exist, but the current stress model does not

'S

utilize this option. In order to utilize this law,further research must be conducted for the followingreasons: (1) the type of creep law which is applicableat a given temperature and stress must be determinedand (2) the constants used in each appropriate creeplaw must be extrapolated from experimental data.

Stress modeling results show stress concentrationsdevelop in the region of an oxide step, in the top edge .

S. of a metal line, and in the vicinity of siliconprecipitates.

P- r

, 17

P i%

Page 31: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

S131N"

SiAi-Sn

5;N,

Fiue40iieeeetms eciigsrs

or '

Page 32: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

4.3 Effects of underlying oxide layer; The stress models of metallization systems withvarying oxide stress and thickness have been completed.

Based on thermomechanical stress theory, the overallstress levels will be worse with oxide present becauseof the coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch.

Areas of inclusion, such as triple point ofmaterial (i.e., metal/oxide/protective overcoat), showsignificantly higher shear stresses than previousmodels with no underlying oxide. Based onthermomechanical stress theory, overall stress levelswill be worse with oxide present because of the Jcoefficient of thermal expansion mismatch (i.e., 0.5ppm/deg C for thermal silicon oxide, 23.5 ppm/deg C forAl-Si metal, and 2.23 ppm/deg C for silicon nitrideprotective overcoat).

4.4 Linewidth dependence of stress .Modeling results indicate that a peak stressdevelops in the metal line at the 2 to 3 micron range

based on variations in metal line width alone. Based onexperimental findings, this is the region where grainboundaries parallel to the metal line edge decrease and .4bamboo structures are formed. This bamboo structureresults in slit-like voids as reported by severalresearch groups. Since this range of line widths isused quite frequently in VLSI technology, the stress in %the metallization must be carefully monitored. The ?I.characteristic von Mises stress contours for a 1, 2, 3,5, and 10 microns wide metal line are shown in Figures5-9. The most critical stress concentration within themetallization is the shaded region in the upper edge ofthe metal line.

A comparison of maximum calculated stress valuesat site A in Figure 10 with the experimentalobservations of this phenomenon can be seen in Figure11.

., %

,,,

19

A%-" "

0~ %

Page 33: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

AI-Si

1 MIC11Figue 5 VonMiss stesscontur lot or

miro wieASimtl(otusaevery 0 M~a)

C'20

Page 34: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

..!*

390 MPa " i

S13 N4 A I-S i

2 MICRON :

p'.%

Figure 6. Von Mises stress contour plot for 2 O.

micron wide Al-Si metal (contours at ,<.every 50 MPa).

21'*

* F * -"

-.%

P'-N

,;- ., , ,2 M ICRON .,',S', ., , -, , ,, ,,,,

Page 35: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

Si N

3" 4

4 e0M ra 50--")

K.44-

. _%,,,

!,. 44

""I'.,.,

MICRON "'s":/::

0 0 ,"4,I

''1

22"'

,Z .

Page 36: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

Si3N

J--p

-. Al-Si

5 MICRON

Figure 8. Von Mises stress contour plot for 5 "

micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa).

23

% %

Page 37: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

.Ap

-A-S. --- A-

3% Si

-3

-3%S.

S~

.5

-AS.A-5-.-

A..

5.

A~

S.5* 55. ~d,5*5*

* S3%.

uI~.1k. 'S

S

3%.5

'A-

-~ P.S

*5*3A5*. -A-- AMICRON A.lu -.

'S."A

A~3

A/S

5-3

SI

A

Figure 9. Von Mises stress contour plot for 10micron wide Al-Si metal (contours atevery 50 MPa).

.5 ~5. 0

3$

A-

24

0.5.3 5.

5.-

* S'5 ..........................................

U. ~ ~A'~

Page 38: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

i

-Sio2 %?

-.. * -

4 25

F 0a i mvL-mt

atn

at evry 50M~a)

,,...

.4 -%

SiteA. . -. S

25__.,:d1

I , ..02"4.

Page 39: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

..

After J. Yue, et al., IRPS '85, p.130

400 /

..,

C010C*r

"' *o4 .

0

Figure 1. Comparison of theoretical stress. . modeling values to experimental

observations 2.

V 26

V %V

% %

-

"p •p.,. _%

Page 40: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

4.5 Compressive stress passivation layer

Modeling efforts indicate that the magnitude of -.intrinsic stress in compressive silicon nitride

passivation and its thickness is one of the mostcrucial factors in metal voiding/notching. Voidsand notches have been observed in aluminum linespassivated with highly stressed compressive siliconnitride. The density and size of the voids arestrongly dependent on the magnitude of the compressivestress in the silicon nitride passivation. The densityof metal voids was found to be a power function of thetensile stress in the metallization [2]. The resultssuggest that a temperature-dependent transient creep isresponsible for metal void formation.

There are two sources of stress in the Al-Simetallization being induced by the passivation layer.One is the stress inherent to the passivationdeposition process. The magnitude of the strain in Al-Si caused by the deposition is on the order of 1 to 3ppm, which is determined by slice curvaturemeasurements. This value is too small to cause thevoids observed in metal lines for many cases. Theother source of stress is the thermal expansionmismatch between the Al-Si lines, silicon substrate,silicon dioxide layer, and passivation film. Theamount of strain due to the thermal mismatch can beestimated as follows. Aluminum is essentially stress Sfree around 400 degrees C, which is the modeledtemperature of the passivation deposition process.When the metallization is cooled to room temperature,the stress formed in it is tensile. The strain inducedin the metal line is calculated to be about 1% for atemperature excursion of 400 degrees C with thematerial properties specified in Table 1.

The characteristics of the passivation directly on %top of metallization seems to be another crucial factorin minimizing metal void formation. Modeling effortsindicate that a highly compressive (greater than 400MPa) passivation layer will induce large tensilestresses (200-500 MPa) specifically in the uppercorners of the metal line. Tensile stress induced in Vthe Al-Si metallization may also be expected to enhancegrain boundary diffusivity (11].

Thicker passivation is used throughout the

27

j.0

Page 41: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

semiconductor manufacturing industry to minimize damagecaused by plastic packaging-related shear stress '"•

during temperature cycling. However, thickerS compressive passivation produces a larger state of

tensile stress in the aluminum metallization.Experimental findings [17] also indicate that the creep- .Amechanism is thermally activated at approximately 165-180 degrees C.

4.6 Silicon nodulesS

Void and silicon nodule formation in Al-Simetallization are enhanced through the tensile stresseswhich develop in the metallization after elevatedtemperatures [18-21]. Silicon nodules have been foundto be greater than 1 micron in size. In addition,other impurities, such as nitrogen and hydrogen, havebeen found in the Al-Si metallization. The failureshave been either current-crowding by silicon nodulescausing electromigration-like failures or increased 4amounts of stress in the metal lines due to thepresence of silicon nodules.

The localized maximum tensile stress in a Al-Simetal line (site A in Figure 12) increases with thepresence of a silicon nodule. As a result, the stress J

model gives physical interpretation for the initiationand growth of voids within Al-Si metallization with thepresence of silicon nodules.

In many cases of open metallization, the presence Vof silicon nodules during metal void formation and

growth has been observed. In Figure 13, typical siliconnodule growth can be observed in partially etched Al-Si. The close proximity of silicon nodules and metalvoids indicates an interdependence between the twophenomenon. Stress modeling has shown that siliconprecipitates cause abnormal tensile stressconcentrations in the adjacent metallization.Depending on the magnitude of temperature change, thestress concentration factor can be as high as five Stimes the average tensile stress value. Such a stressconcentration can act as an initiation site for voidingand open metallization.

As the size of the silicon nodule increases (0.50 to 2.0 microns) in the metal line, the respective S

maximum tensile stress in the metal increases

28

"-L' ILr or'.

L% I.

Page 42: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

.

*44

Sio

4%2

Mr W

Page 43: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

~..,?'

64

0 30

a

%

A', 1 % %.

: ,'. -:.:

-J •

* 0

a'.,

-. , .. . ,. a

Page 44: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

significantly (10-30%) as shown in Figure 14. Agraphical presentation of stress as a function of thesilicon nodule size-to-linewidth ratio is depicted inFigure 15. As the cross sectional area of the siliconnodule increases, the metallization must relieve more S

stress per unit area. Although the von Mises stressincreases at a much slower rate (5-10%), the silicon I"

nodule can change the localized stress field ,NZdramatically during its formation. This silicon noduleformation is a dynamic process which is beyond thescope of this stress modeling program.

. %

.3 11%

1.4'[

S

0":.

3 1 " %..".

," ." ,"r'.4

" -w ,m . * " % % *" - W" - [ * " , - .° ' .

Page 45: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

MAX - 405 MWoI

0.5 MICRON NODULE

MAX- 445 MPa

1.0 MICRON NODULE

4MAX -520 Mpa

2.0 MICRON NODULE

Al-S*

Figure 14. Induced Stress for Several siliconNodule Sizes (contours at every 50 MPa). -p

32

0%

Page 46: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

STRESS E MPoscols 3

550 S

MAXIMUM TENSILE STRESS500

450 */

400 . a* MAXIMUM VON MISES STRESS

350

300 1

000.2 0.4 0.6 0.6

NODULE-TO-LINEWIOTH RATIO

Figure 15. Maximum Tensile and Von Mises Stress as aFunction of Silicon. Nodule Size-to-Linewidth Ratio.

33

%.9.

Page 47: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

0 0

4.7 Metallization parameters

Since the mechanical and geometric properties of.the metallization have a significant impact on thestress that will be induced, several parameters of the

metallization are outlined below. This list ofparameters is comprehensive enough to encompass keyissues in open metallization failures.

4.7.1 Metal line topography

The additional stress concentration due totopography can be seen in Figure 16 (site A), asmetallization traverses an oxide step. Sites of voidnucleation are considered to be the combination ofstress concentration areas (e.g., corners) and highOlevels of von Mises stress (plastic deformation failurestress). In Figures 17a and 17b, such sites arehighlighted to indicate that observed voids do occur inthis area more frequently. Figure 17a shows a simpletwo dimensional stress distribution cross section of ametal line and Figure 17b shows a cross section of ametal line over an oxide step.

* Since more catastrophic open failures occur atoxide steps (Figures 18 and 19), characterizing stressas a function of the topology will aid in metal layoutdesign. The metal void mechanism is topographicallydependent: notching occurs at top surface of flatmetal patterns and gross voiding, stopping at triplepoints in aluminum, occurs on metallization oversteps. This problem is worse -in ceramic packagesbecause die attach and lid seal temperature excursionsaccelerate the process.

,. 4.7.2 Variations in metal thickness

Changing the metal line thickness from 0.5 to 1.5microns only became significant in metal linewidthsless than 2 microns. Since many variations exist, only

* a summary of the findings are provided in this report. •The calculated von Mises stress increased (10%) in a1.5 micron thick ( 1 micron wide ) metal line. With a

'p 0.5 micron thick ( 1 micron wide ) metal line, vonMises stress decreased (5%). These data points are *

summarized in Figure 20 which illustrates the linewidth5 and thickness relationship. This relationship can be S

seen as a form factor dependency, but must be weighted

-p

* A

A ~A 34

010

. *-~* .9%

* ~ .%

Page 48: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

SW'

. sit. ?, SiO 2 A

,J.

,. %'

." %'/

'-, -.'

''i

X ,,,,," ' , , , . , . ". ,..", . .. .. . , , .",,". , • .- .. . "' . .. " s5*

Page 49: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

HIGH STRESS SITES

342S

3 .9

22

Figure l7a. Von Mises stress contour plot for 3micron wide Al-Si metal on flat surface(contours at every 50 MPa).

HIGH STRESS SITES

2S

33

3 2I

3

3-

Figure 17b. Von Mises stress contour plot for Al-Simetal traversing over 1 micron oxidestep (contours at every 50 MPa).

36

A&M

Page 50: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

0

lw

.%%

% %

Figure 18. Metal voids observed in narrow Al-Siinterconnects at oxide step (SEM, after

4 passivation removal).

37

% 0e.. kp

.* -

I .

Page 51: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

4 0

N0

. ...

%-A' Figure 19. Metal void formation adjacent to oxide -';£

' step (SEM, after passivation removal).

J. ...---'

,a -., 3 8 5.

.'.

O O¢A % '' . " -:. - "' _ .* - ...-. ' '.-. ~ -.*". :""" "' .:.":"""." .

Page 52: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

STRESS I MPacals 3

500

45 0< MI CRON W IDE , ,

40 a MICRON W IDE "450

So - 3 MICRON WIDE350o MICRON WIDE

o 0. .o-O 5 M I CRON W I DE

300 o 000

250

200

0.5 1.0 1.5

METAL LINE THICKNESS EMICRONS3

Figure 20. Maximum Von Mises Stress as a Function ofSeveral Linewidths and Thicknesses.

39

I WP

4.. .- ' , ., - .-.., .:.-.,-. - - -.•. , ' .- - .-. .. -,-,. ",'; .- - -. -. .. -----.. ,.--. --- . ""

it-,.% ,. % % .5. .% .* ', , ., "% , • . - ' . , % . .. - .%. . - " , • .,,,. , ., ,, .,,. % . ... , ..,-' ''.-... ' .A

Page 53: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

440 P

with the expected grain structure and grain sizeexpected for this linewidth in order to predictabsolute void formation.

4.7.3 Metallization yield strength variations>T---

As the yield strength of the Al-Si metallizationincreases (all other material properties remaining thesame), the von Mises stress decreases because lessplastic deformation can take place during a cooldownstage. As shown in Figure 21, a 3 micron wide metalline (yield strength at 25 degrees C = -100 MPa), thevon Mises stress is approximately 410 MPa. For thatsame 3 micron metal line, a 50 MPa yield stress inducesa 500 MPa von Mises stress and a 200 MPa yield stressinduces a 350 MPa stress. A graph depicting theinduced Von Mises stress in a 3 micron wide metal lineas a function of metal yield strength is shown inFigure 22.

4.7.4 Metal line slant angle %

* Figure 23 shows variations in slant angle of

metallization edge from 60 to 90 degrees. Thesevariations cause relatively small changes in the stressproduced in the metallization. The stress is simplyredistributed in the metal line and shear stress in theunderlying oxide changes its angle of intensity.

4.8 Aluminum-copper metal systems __

Several semiconductor manufacturers havedetermined that with the addition of a small percentageof copper, open metallization can be minimized. Sincecopper rapidly precipitates out of the aluminum grain,a thin cohesive precipitate will form at the grainboundary whenever the temperature is reduced. These

cohesive precipitates passivate the grain boundariesand minimize vacancy accumulation. This metal systemhas not been characterized well enough from a material

0 science point-of-view to effectively model stressdistributions.

4.9 Three dimensional effectsAlthough stress in passivation is equal in both

* dimensions of the metal/passivation interface plane,finite element modeling efforts indicate that the

40

IN P

S p. 4 % %

% -,p..

Page 54: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

,% '

YIELD STRENGTH - 50 MPa

MAX 500O Meo S!3 4 .

YIELD STRENGTH 10O MPa

MAX- 410 MPoa Si3N A3, )

41-.44 i.s. ...

" '.4

YIELD STRENGTH -200 MPo

,--.YALSTRGPa .- 0".

A4-S

41.

"..''w

""

Page 55: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

MAXIMUM VON MISESSTRESS I'.

I MPASCALS I

Boo

550.

0

500

450

400 o-

350

300

50 100 150 200

METAL YIELD STRENGTH C MPASCALS 3

Figure 22. Maximum Von Mises Stress as a Function of , 'Metal Yield Strength (for a 3 micron wide .metal line) .

: : .42.

.

.* .5

Page 56: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

SLANT ANGLE -60 DEC

S N

Al-Si

SLANT ANGLE -75 CEC

S SA

AI-SS.

SLANT ANGLE -90 DEG . 5

AI-Si

4/Figure 23. Induced Stress for Several Slant Anglesof Al-Si Metallization Edge (contoursat every 50 MPa).

5 43

*% %

Page 57: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

j*~*~ .~j~

.. h.S.'

.4 ~.

stress generated by thermal expansion mismatch in thelength direction can be adequately described in a two-dimensional cross-section. A view of the stresscontours from a direction perpendicular to the surface Sare depicted in Figures 24 and 25. The strength of the

9 metalV

A

S~S.. ~,*

-'£5.5

5,..',

45~'..'.5'

'p.,

5.,. "S

.1~*

'p. ~5',

'p.

* 5

'p.5-

".5..

S"'p

"5'p5k

.5 .5%5'.

5-

. 'p

.5..

.5%

''p.5% S

S..

0 44

.5-'.

.5.5.

A ~ ' 9~ ~ ~

Page 58: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

*PLANAR STRESS ALONG LENGTH TOP VIEW

A-iSi 02

Figue 24 Thre Diensinal iew ~f Mtal itoStress.

p. 45

0j .' III,

Page 59: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

PLANAR STRESS ALONG LENGTH TPVE

STRESS CONCENTRATION IN OXIDE STEPMETAL AT OXIDE STEP

Si A%.S0

03

stress over n Oxid Step

%J~%

P r p r p r i N 7 % - -14 0

Page 60: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

line is proportional to the width of the line (i.e.,grain size). If the metal line is subjected to acritical stress field, some net mass flow will occur ina direction to relieve the stress. Since the grainboundaries have the highest density of vacancies,migration along the grain boundaries is certainly themost rapid.

*A A

0

4%%

-'47

'I...

Page 61: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

To assure designed-in reliability standards, ithas become necessary to semi-quantitatively determinethe effects of several integrated circuit fabricationparameters on metallization stress : the metal formfactors, the magnitude of allowable compressive stressin passivation layers, and the presence of siliconnodules.

The objective of the Stress Related FailuresCausing Open Metallization contract was to clarify thestresses in microelectronic chips which can result inopen metal failures. Based on the results of theeffort, the following conclusions can be reached:

1. PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION - Through the use ofnumerical analysis techniques, excellent correlationwith experimental observations can be achieved. As aresult, the present stress model gives an adequatephysical interpretation for the initiation and growthof voids within Al-Si metallization.

"-. *z

0 2. VOID INITIATION - In the presence of vacancyconcentration gradients, stress fields will lead to theinitial flow of vacancies from the transverse to the

N longitudinal boundaries. This flow will in turn, causean opposite flow of metal atoms that creates thetensile strain in the direction of the stress. It ishas been shown in previous studies [22] that thepreferred location for void nucleation is at the edgesof the metal line. VOID GROWTH - These vacancies willcluster to form microscopic voids given sufficient timeat low temperature.

3. VOID LOCATION - It has been observedthroughout the semiconductor industry that voids have apreference to accumulate at the upper edge of the metalline. The stress modeling results indicate that thisregion has the highest stress gradients and magnitudesthan any other location.

4. LINEWIDTH DEPENDENCE - Observations of peak -. *.

void density in Al-Si linewidths of 2 to 3 microns havecorrelated well with the peak calculatedthermomechanical stress in this range. There exists aform factor relationship in the stress levels of thinfilm Al-Si metallization. The most sensitive parameter

49

Page 62: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

0 0l

in this relationship is the linewidth. The second andthird most sensitive parameters are the thickness and

N length, respectively. As seen in Figure 11,experimental data is typical of the stress valuescalculated by FEM. The only variable in thisparticular analysis was form factor related (i.e.,metallization line width) A similar characteristiccurve of electromigration data depicting the same typeof line width dependence of electromigration lifetimeshas been observed [23].

5. PASSIVATION STRESS - Experimental results have* %shown the effects of highly stressed silicon nitride

passivation on Al-Si voiding during bake testinggreater than 100 degrees C ) Observations haveindicated that as the passivation stress increased from500 MPascals to 1000 MPascals, the percentage of thevoid size to linewidth increased from 15% to 45% [17].The calculated stress values in the metallization also

dr showed a linear relationship with the stress in the-0_% passivation.

0 6. SILICON NODULES - The presence of siliconnodules in Al-Si metallization act as stressconcentration sites and provide a supplemental tensilestrain for void formation. In some cases, experimentalobservations reveal silicon nodules in the vicinity oflarge voids. The stress modeling data indicates thatsilicon nodules induce relatively large tensile strainsin the metallization. An increase in the size of thesilicon nodule also translates into larger tensilestress, and therefore a larger probability ofcatastrophic void formation (open metallization). Metalvoids, appearing after metal and passivation deposition(through stress relaxation and creep), serve as stressconcentrations. The tensile stress concentration in

.~ ~ the vicinity causes metal voids to grow further insubsequent thermal packaging and assembly operations.

7. MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION - This programencountered several problems with material propertydata of thin film materials. However, the elasticityand plasticity of the Al-Si metallization gavesufficient information regarding the relative magnitudeof stress. The micromechanics and creep rate of Al-Simetallization are key parameters which remain to be

50

N "j

I%% 0

Page 63: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

characterized well enough to be useful in the stress .,

modeling software. This characterization must becompleted before any significant stress data can beformulated. a

Upon presentation of this work to the technical -.

community, several semiconductor manufacturers haveimplemented finite element stress modeling totheoretically analyze stress distribution inmetallization. This dissemination of techniques willeventually results in better reliability ofsemiconductor products. .%

0

% %

,7a-?"

K' 'a

%o--

* 01

.4, .4.---.... -..-. ./ . ... ' ..... v . . . .-- ... .- '' '" " " " ''" " "' ' " " """ ' "

Page 64: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the finite element stress modelingperformed during this contract were the starting pointfor additional metallization studies. In order to ,minimize the probability of void formation in Al-Simetallization, a coupling of the micromechanics of Al-Si metallization, experimental observations and stressmodeling must be achieved.

This project took a "first look" at the stressdistribution in thin film metallization as induced bythermal excursions. Such parameters as, thermalhistory of the metallization, addition of copper to theAl-Si metallization, multilevel metallization, andlayered metallization (Ti/W/Al-Si) need furtherinvestigation which is beyond the scope of this

V project. However, this work advanced the physicalinterpretation of void formation in Al-Si metallization

N based on several boundary conditions.

%i Control of the metallization microstructure,silicon nodules growth, and passivation depositionprocesses should allow production of interconnects with

WV, improved reliability. The delicate balance inmicrostructure is really an issue of fabricationtechniques, metal systems, electromigrationrequirements, and deposition parameters. The siliconnodule control is driven by the silicon content in themetallization and is defined by several fabricationtechniques. A minimization of nodules will increasethe mechnical integrity of the metallizationsignificantly. The magnitude of compressive stress inthe passivation layer is basically a function of thedeposition parameters: the Si/N ratio, hydrogenbonding, the density and the related microstructure ofthe film. Minimization of the compressive stress levelin the passivation in order to decrease the inducedtensile strain in the metallization must be weightedagainst the pinhole integrity of the passivation. Both

* experimental and modeling results indicate thatcompressive stress levels in the passivation must beless than 1000 MPascals, in order to avoid openmetallization failures.

.4 53

*

NI4%%

_vF W6

Page 65: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

REFERENCES

[1] T. Turner and K. Wendel, "The Influence ofStress on Aluminum Conductor Life," IEEE Proc.23rd Annual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 142-147, 1985.

(2] J.T. Yue, et al. , "Stress Induced Voids inAluminum Interconnects During IC Processing,".IEEE Proc. 23rd Annual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 126-137, 1985.

[3] M.R. Lin and J.T. Yue, "Impact of CeramicPackaging Anneal on the Reliability of AlInterconnects," IEEE Proc. 24th Annual Proc. Rel.Phys.., pp. 164-171, 1986.

[4] N. Owada, et al., "Stress Induced Slit-Like VoidFormation in a Fine-Pattern Al-Si InterconnectDuring Aging Test Proceedings," IEEE VLSI Multi- r.Level Interconnect Conference, pp. 173-179, 1985.

[5] K. Hinode, et al., "Stress-induced Grain BoundaryFractures in Al-Si Interconnects, J. Vac. Sci.Technol. B 5 (2), pp. 518-522, 1987.

[6] H. Koyama, et al., "Suppression of StressInduced Aluminum Void Formation," IEEE 24thAnnual Proc. Rel. Phys, pp. 24-29, 1985.

[7] J. Klema, et al., "Reliability Implications ofNitrogen Contamination During Deposition ofSputtered Aluminum/Silicon Metal Films," IEEE22nd Annual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 1-5, 1984.

[8] H. Hieber, "Thermomechanical Relaxation of Thin-Film Metallizations, " Material Research SocietySymposium Proceedings, 40, pp. 191-202, 1985.

[9] H. Hieber and T. Simon, "Thermo-mechanical %%

Cycling Behavior of Al Thin-Film Metallization," 5IEEE Proc. 24th Annual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 253-259, 1986. ''' :

[10] R.E. Jones, Jr., "Line Width Dependence ofStresses in Aluminum Interconnect," IEEE Proc.25th Annual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 9-14, 1987.

55. .,..

".

Page 66: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

[11] R.W. Balluffi and J.M. Blakely, "Special Aspectsof Diffusion in Thin Films," Thin Solid Films,25, pp. 363-392, 1975.

[12] S. Mayumi, et al., "The Effect of Cu Addition toAl-Si Interconnects on Stress Induced Open-Circuit Failures," IEEE Proc. 25th Annual Proc.Rel. Phys., pp. 15-21, 1987.

[13] M. Hershkovitz, et al., "Stress Relaxation inThin Aluminum Films," Thin Solid Films, 130, pp. S87-93, 1985.

[14] T. Z. Blazynski, "Applied Elasto-Plasticity ofSolids," London, Macmillan, 1983.

[15] W. Prager, "Introduction to Mechanics ofContinua," Boston, Ginn, 1961.

[16] J.T. Oden, "Finite Elements of NonlinearContinua," New York, McGraw-Hill, 1973.

[17] C.F. Dunn and J.W. McPherson, Privatecommunication.

[18] S.J. O'Donnell, et al., "Silicon Inclusions inAluminum Interconnects," IEEE 22nd Annual Proc. -

Rel. Phys., pp. 9-16, 1984.

[19] T. Tatsuzawa, et al., "Si Nodule Formation in Al-Si Metallization," IEEE 23rd Annual Proc. Rel.Phys., pp. 138-141, 1985.

[20] J. Curry, et al., "New Failure Mechanisms in

Sputtered Aluminum-Silicon Films," IEEE 22ndAnnual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 6-8, 1984.

[21] S. B. Herschbein, et al., "Effects of SiliconInclusions on the Reliability of SputteredAluminum-Silicon Metallization," IEEE 22ndAnnual Proc. Rel. Phys., pp. 134-137, 1984. 0

[22] R.W. Pasco, et al., "The Effects of HydrogenAmbients on Electromigration Kinetics in Al-2%CuThin Film Conductors," Solid-State Electronics,pp. 1053-1063, 1983.

56

0-er

'pS.,

or.

Page 67: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

A

S

[23] S. Vaidya, et al., "Electromigration Resistanceof Fine-Line for VLSI Applications," IEEE 18thAnnual Proc. Rel. Thy~1 pp. 165-170, 1980._____ I

SiiS

.J.

1., ** b

.~ .d'

... -.

~'K

S S

..

V

N

S...

?

S S'p

\.,.

4.

S

57

0

0~ '4

5'- ! $

Page 68: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

1.4 Stress model scaling

Extensive computation time would be necessary if athe model included the entire die and the thin filmstructures. The thickness of the silicon substrate wassignificantly reduced while maintaining the samestiffness. Therefore, the model was scaled down toinclude only thin film structures and a small portionof the silicon substrate.

The finite element mesh (Figure 4, main text) wasgenerated with careful consideration of the transitionfrom macroscopic to microscopic features by (1)including boundary conditions which maintained the samestiffness of the entire chip, (2) maintain an aspectratio of 3 to 1 for all elements in the model, and (3)requiring material interfaces to be continuous. Basedon these assumptions, the stress model used throughoutthe project was considered to be appropriate for thisstress simulation.

The symmetry of the model permitted the use ofonly one-half of the multilayered structure during 6model creation and analysis phases which significantlydecreased the computational time.

2.0 MODELING RESULTS

Due to the computational nature of finite element Sanalysis and the vast amount of output for singlesimulations, the stress contour diagrams have beenincluded in the text of this report. It is quite clearin reviewing the stress contour plots that the stressesin the metallization are relatively high at the upperedge of the metal line. N

The thermally-induced stresses are extremelycomplex tensor quantities which are difficult torepresent in a standard plot. Since plasticdeformation occurs past the eleastic limit (von Mises

*m failure theory), the most useful plot would be that ofvon Mises stress. This is an energy-related stress andhas been determined for all variables in this contract.With a constrained metallization, this plastic flowonly results in small strain deformations which allow ,..

stress relaxation. The calculated stresses aretensile, as expected by simple thermomechanical stress -theory.

.S. Government ,-ting office 190-SI . Ti 716409S I61

0 50

Page 69: D-19 61 RELATED FAILURES CAUSING /1 ElllllElhEliI TEXAS ... · * ~APPROVED: ~ AAt4.1 JOHN J. BART . -. - Technical Director Directorate of Reliability & Compatibility FOR THE COMMANDER:

- ~

6

~

m~.

~ -"V

'pp ~"V.1"

'. ~AA'

*

0p~. J~ *~.

0

4

.~ *.

-,",

~'- ~

*AA

A

* 0

- - ,"c.11.- v'~,p * *~.-~e ~~ 4