Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 41
CUSTOMER ACQUISITION AND RETENTION MANAGEMENT IN
RETAIL INDUSTRY-WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO VILLUPURAM
DISTRICT
Dr. K. VIJAYARANI
Professor and Head, Commerce Wing, DDE,
Annamalai University, Annamalainagar-608 002, Tamilnadu
Mrs. R. BRINDHA
Ph.D., Research Scholar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Abhizhegapatti, Tirunelveli-627 012
ABSTRACT
Customer retention is beyond satisfying and maintaining existing customers. Hence, attention on this area
is greatly needed in order to further improve the firm’s performance. It is believed that customer retention strategy
will be a great management tool for retailers to survive and grow in the very competitive retailing industry. The
findings of this study in addition to the implications given are expected to enlighten the practices of customer
retention within retailing sector. This article paper highlights customer acquisition and retention management in
retail industry-with special reference to Villupuram district.
KEY WORDS: Customer Acquisition, Customer Retention Management, Retail Industry, Customer Preferences,
Organised Sectors
INTRODUCTION
Consumers play a vital role in business. They are the backbone of a business. Sale of any product or
service comes from two ways. One is through existing customers (repeat sales) and another is through new
customer (fresh sales). Nothing may seen more obvious than the need to keep customers coming back as
cultivating loyal customers can lead to increased sales and customer share and lower cost. But here the challenge is
to retain the existing customers. Retaining existing customers needs a totally different set of strategies than
attracting new customers every time. Now - a - days, it is very difficult to retain customers owing to reasons like
competition in the market place, customer education and awareness about the products and brands, deficiencies in
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 42
customer care, ever changing customer preferences for products, accessibility of products in the market, etc.,
Hence marketers are equally focusing on attracting new customers into their fold, which is relatively easier one. As
a result, sales are mostly through first time purchases also. Now the question before the marketers is how to drive
customers towards their products. Advertising, sales promotion, personal selling are some of the important
strategies being used for this purpose. In some cases, they bring desired sales to the firm. Now, the crux of the
problem with business houses is how to acquire new customers on one hand and on the other, how to retain
existing customers.
Retail
Retail is the process of selling consumer goods and/or services to customers through multiple channels of
distribution to earn a profit. Demand is created through diverse target markets and promotional tactics, satisfying
consumers' wants and needs through a lean supply chain.
Retail is defined as relating to the sale of goods directly to consumers. An example of retail is selling
shirts to customers in a clothing store.
Acquisition of Customers
A customer acquisition strategy defines the best mix of media and engagement tools (lead generation and
product offers) to gain new customers through targeting them and reaching them through online and
offline customer journeys.
Customer acquisition refers to gaining new consumers. Acquiring new customers involves persuading
consumers to purchase a company‟s products and/or services. Companies and organizations consider the cost of
customer acquisition as an important measure in evaluating how much value customers bring to their businesses.
Customer acquisition management refers to the set of methodologies and systems for managing customer
prospects and inquiries that are generated by a variety of marketing techniques.
Customer Retention
Customer retention is the strategic objective of striving to maintain long-term relationships with customers.
Customer retention is the mirror image of customer defection. A high retention rate is equivalent to a low defection
rate. The number of customers doing business with a firm at the end of a financial year expressed as percentage of
those who were active customers at the beginning of the year.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Wang and Lo (2002) identified the “Service Quality, Customer satisfaction and behaviour intentions”,
relationship between the Service Quality Factors, Overall Service Quality, Customer Value, Customers
Satisfaction and Behaviour Intentions. The significant impact is identified between the tangibles, reliability on
overall service quality; assurance and empathy on overall service quality, tangibles, empathy, network quality and
customer sacrifice on customer value, reliability, assurance and Network quality on customer satisfaction and
customer value and satisfaction on behaviour intentions.
Lather and Kaur (2006) in their study on Malls in India analysed the influence of selected attributes on
store patronage for doing shopping. The authors highlighted that shopper decision on retail format depends upon
store characteristics. Keeping these facts, the researchers had studied the nine characteristics of Malls to elaborate
the enthralling shopping experiences. The study provided academics, Mall developers and retailers a richer
understanding of various components that contribute to malls experiences.
Angana Borah and A.P.Singh (2008) “Emerging Issues in the Organised Retail Sector: A study of
Guwahati city” opined that a retail image that appeals to part of retailers. The retail image is strengthened through
the shopping experiences that a customer.
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 43
Sengupta and Noopur Agarwal, (2008) “In-Store Promotion - A relevant Promotional tool in Organised
Retailing”, estimated the organised retail pie to comprise clothing, textiles and fashion accessories 40 per cent,
food and grocery 19 per cent, durable 13 per cent, footwear 9 per cent, Jewelry and watches, home
doctor 7 per cent, books, music and gifts 3 per cent, beauty products 2 per cent and others 7 per cent.
Jai Awatramani, and et .al (2009) “Customer Shopping Behavior - Organised & Unorganised Retail in
Mumbai, India”, They concluded that items which are purchased on daily basis will be preferred on basis of
closeness to the stores- organised or unorganised, for items which customers prefer to purchase once in a week
have a higher probability in going in for organised retail.
Mahesh, D and et. al, ( 2011) “A Study on Intention and Attitude of Consumer Behaviour towards Retail
Stores in Chennai District, The study found out that there was significant difference among the gender, age of the
respondents and factors of shopping intention. The study concluded that an understanding and knowledge of
various factors that led to shopping intention and attitude of the consumer would help the retailers to climb the
high ladder in the market.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
In order to sharpen the marketing mix companies have been moving from marketing at the aggregate level,
called Mass Marketing, to Mass customization to the level of 1-to-1 marketing where each customer is treated as a
separate segment. The factors that have weighed heavily on this decision are the need to fine-tune the marketing
strategies and the realization that the cost of retaining customer (read servicing) an existing customer is much
lower than acquiring a new customer.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The Indian market has seen vast changes in political, economical and social environment, which has a great
impact on consumption. With the Indian as well as international corporate entering into the Indian retail scenario
the market has been divided between the traditional and the organized sector. The Indian retail scenario is
presently facing the similar situations as the mom and pop stores in the developing nations faced at the emergence
big box retailers. There are various issues that need to be addressed, like what would be future patterns of
consumption, which formats of retail would be preferred by customers and will the rise of organized retail affect
the traditional retailers.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
In the present scenario, customer motivation and satisfaction is under the control of business people and
especially retailers. The situation of market and trends in price of commodities, mainly, under the control of these
departments. They can raise the prices and they can down the prices according to the market situation.
The growth and development of any retailers are depending on their marketing skills and business
performance. The marketing skills depend on two factors, i.e. nature of commodity and attitude of customer
towards the commodity and the business performance depends on marketing situation and schemes introduced to
attract the customers. These two factors are depending on role and performance of neighborhood shops. It is
necessary for a retailer to measure the sort and long term activities performed to attract and motivate customers.
This is very much needed in retailing especially neighborhoods shops to develop significant sales of food and
grocery to the customers.
The researcher identifies the following problems are as under: changing economic environment, heavy
initial investments, Malls to elaborate the enthralling shopping experiences, expectations and store atmosphere
evaluations, financial and mobility restrictions, Influence patronage intentions, affects consumer format choice
decisions, modern technology is another problem the retail industry faces, Despite security measures, theft,
shoplifting, and fraud are ongoing problems for retailers, Consumer tastes and preferences can change rapidly and
greatly affect demand for retail items. Fashion fads and product life cycles can be unpredictable and companies
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 44
may struggle to make merchandising decisions, correct assortment is a major concern for retailers, checking
pricing with competitors whilst both shopping on and offline, accurate gauge of demand is critical for retail
planners, lack of retail space, Trained manpower shortage, Thinking outside the box to improve productivity,
innovation and competitive advantage, Improving efficiency, time and speed of delivery, engaging retaining and
growing talent. Hence, in the present study on customer acquisition and retention management in retail industry-
with special reference to Villupuram district.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Hence, the present study attempts customer acquisition and retention management in retail industry with
special reference to Villupuram district.
1. To study the shopping intention, location, store loyalty, retail sales service to analyse the shopping
attitude, and to identify the determinants of shopping habits of customers‟ acquisition and retention
towards organised retail store in Villupuram district.
2. To analyse the factors influencing customers‟ opinion towards prefer organised retailing in Villupuram
district.
3. To ascertain customer satisfaction and service quality regarding organised retail stores in Villupuram
district.
TESTING OFHYPOTHESIS
Null Hypothesis for customer acquisition and retention management in retail industry, keeping in mind the
above objectives following Null Hypotheses are framed and tested.
H01: There is no significant difference between type of retail industry and customer acquisition practices.
H02: There is no significant difference between type of retail industry and customer retention practices.
H03: There is no significant difference between demographic profiles of the respondents with respect to (a) growth
of retail industries, (b) strategies for growth of retail industries, (c) customer acquisition (d) strategies for
customer acquisition (e) customer retention and (f) strategies for customer retention.
H04: There is no significant difference between quality of services important in the retail store and store location
of the respondents.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study is based on both primary and secondary data. The primary data are those which are collected a
fresh and for the first time and thus happens to be original in character. The questionnaire is too designed and
supplied to the respondents for collecting primary data. In this method, a questionnaire is sent to the persons
concerned with a request to answer the questions and return the interview schedule.
Research Methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be understood as a
science of studying how research is done scientifically. To do my study I have adopted exploratory research
design. The primary data is collected through interview schedule from customers and questionnaire from retail
stores.
DATA COLLECTION
Data will be collected using both primary as well as secondary method.
Primary Data
The primary instrument for data collection in this research was questionnaire and well-structured interview
schedule. A detailed interview schedule was prepared to know the buying pattern and to seek the opinion of the
customers who responded to the same and questionnaire was prepared to collected data from owner, managers and
employees of various retail outlets.
Initially, before asking questions, a good rapport was established and good cooperation of the customers
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 45
was solicited. Then the questions were asked in a structured order. All kind of doubts of the customers was
clarified to get the most truthful answer from the customers.
Secondary Data
Secondary data were collected from owner, managers and employees of various retail outlets, previous
studies, retailer‟s records, Research papers, Marketing Journals, Magazines, Text books and websites.
Sampling Design
Primary data will be collected using structured interview schedule and questionnaire. The population of the
study comprises of customer visiting retail stores. For the selection of respondents simple random sampling
method is adopted. The respondent under study belongs to different demographic groups like sex, gender, marital
status, geographic location, occupation, educational level, income level, size of the family members and so on. A
total sample size of 720 out of which 400 customers and 320 employees from retail stores will be approached to
participate in the study. A pilot study will be conducted on 20 customer and 10 employees from retail stores to
finalize the interview schedule and questionnaire items.
STATISTICAL TOOLS AND ANALYSIS
To analyze the level of satisfaction, retaining and acquisition among the retail store brands, the data were
collected from the different types of respondents based on their educational qualifications, occupation, family size,
monthly income, amount spent on retail store per month, type of retail store, quantity of retail store purchase, place
of purchase and mode of payment which were studied by means of percentage analysis, descriptive analysis
(mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation), ANOVA, t-test, chi-square test, correlation analysis, factor
analysis. The reliability and validity analysis of the data in this study was analysed using Statistical Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS v 20.0). The different tools of analysis and the variables studied are as follows:
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The demographic profile of the respondents is analyzed on the basis of their gender, age, marital status,
geographic location, education, occupation, monthly income, size of the family members and nature of family.
Table 1: Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Demographic Profile No. of Respondents Percentage
Gender
Male 258 64.50
Female 142 35.50
Total 400 100.00
Age (in years)
Up to 30 years 85 24.50
31 – 40 Years 61 15.50
41-50 Years 125 31.00
Above 50 Years 129 29.00
Total 400 100.00
Marital Status
Married 322 80.50
unmarried 78 19.50
Total 400 100.00
Geographic Location
Rural 165 41.25
Suburban 99 24.75
Urban 136 34.00
Total 400 100.00
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 46
Education
Up to SSLC 92 23.00
HSC/ Diploma/ITI 97 24.25
Graduate 110 27.50
Post graduate/ Professional 101 25.25
Total 400 100.00
Occupation
Agriculture 44 11.00
Business men 62 15.50
Employed 210 52.50
House wife 61 15.25
Student and Others 23 5.75
Total 400 100.00
Monthly income
(in Rs.)
Less than Rs.10,000 99 24.75
Rs.10,001 to Rs.20, 000 117 29.25
Above Rs.20, 000 184 46.00
Total 400 100.00
Size of the family
members
Small (≤3) 153 38.25
Medium (3-5) 121 30.25
Large (above 5 ) 126 31.50
Total 400 100.00
Nature of Family
Joint 186 46.50
Nuclear 214 53.50
Total 400 100.00
Source: Primary Data
Table 1 reveals the demographic profile of the respondents of the customer acquisition and retention
management in Villupuram district. Out of 400 respondents, 64.50 per cent were male and 35.50 per cent were
female. The predominant age group of the respondents (31 per cent) was distributed in the age group 41 to 50
years. A good majority of the remaining respondents (29 per cent) were distributed in the age group above 55
years. 24.50% and 15.50% of the respondents were distributed in the age groups up to 30 years and 31 to 40 years
respectively. The married category of respondents constitutes 80.50 per cent and 19.50 per cent are unmarried
category of respondents. The geographic location of the respondents constitutes highest of 41.25 per cent of the
respondents belong to rural, 34 per cent of the respondents belong to urban and 24.75 per cent of the respondents
belong to suburban. The highest literacy rate (27.50 per cent) of the respondents is graduate, 25.25 per cent of the
respondents have got post graduate/professional education, 24.25 of the respondents have HSC/ Diploma/ITI
qualification and 23 per cent of the respondents have up to SSLC qualification. The occupation represents that 48
per cent of the respondents are employee, 14.25 per cent are house wife, 14 per cent are businessmen, 13.25 per
cent are students and others and 10 per cent are agriculturalist. About 46 per cent of the respondents have monthly
income of above Rs.20,000, 29.25 per cent have Rs.10,001-20,000 as monthly income and 24.75 per cent of the
respondents have the monthly income of Rs. Less than Rs.10,001. Out of total 38.25 per cent of the respondents
family size of less than or equal 3 members, 30.25 per cent of the respondents family size of 4 to 5 members and
31.50 per cent of the respondents family size of above 5 members. The nature of family size represents that 53.50
per cent are nuclear family and 46.50 per cent of the respondents are joint family towards the respondents in the
customer acquisition and retention in the retail industry in Villupuram district.
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 47
TESTING OF THE HYPOTHESIS
The following null hypothesis has been formulated and one way ANOVA is applied to test the significant
difference between qualities of services is important for the shopping preferences of the respondents and retail
store location.
H01: There is no significant difference between quality of services important in the retail store and store
location of the respondents.
Table 2: ANOVA for Quality of Services and Store Location
Store location
N Mean S.D. Std. Error
95% Confidence F value Sig.
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Convenient
Location of the
Store
Agree 15 4.47 0.64 0.17 4.11 4.82
2.714 0.030*
Strongly Agree 61 3.82 0.87 0.11 3.60 4.04
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 4.45 0.69 0.21 3.99 4.92
Disagree 222 4.20 0.99 0.07 4.07 4.33
Strongly
Disagree 91 4.14 0.96 0.10 3.94 4.34
Total 400 4.15 0.96 0.05 4.05 4.24
Ease in
Identifying the
Store
Agree 15 2.87 1.30 0.34 2.15 3.59
47.760 0.001*
Strongly Agree 61 1.51 1.12 0.14 1.22 1.80
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 2.18 1.08 0.33 1.46 2.91
Disagree 222 3.23 1.30 0.09 3.06 3.41
Strongly
Disagree 91 3.99 0.38 0.04 3.91 4.07
Total 400 3.10 1.36 0.07 2.97 3.23
Ease of
Reaching the
Store Location
Agree 15 4.20 0.56 0.14 3.89 4.51
3.303 0.011*
Strongly Agree 61 3.89 0.64 0.08 3.72 4.05
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 4.27 0.65 0.19 3.84 4.71
Disagree 222 4.31 1.00 0.07 4.17 4.44
Strongly
Disagree 91 4.11 0.55 0.06 4.00 4.22
Total 400 4.19 0.85 0.04 4.11 4.28
Near my
Shopping Area
Agree 15 4.27 1.03 0.27 3.69 4.84
16.541 0.001*
Strongly Agree 61 4.03 0.48 0.06 3.91 4.16
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 4.27 0.90 0.27 3.67 4.88
Disagree 222 4.68 0.70 0.05 4.59 4.78
Strongly
Disagree 91 4.18 0.64 0.07 4.04 4.31
Total 400 4.44 0.73 0.04 4.37 4.51
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 48
Near my Work
Place
Agree 15 3.87 1.41 0.36 3.09 4.65
25.957 0.001*
Strongly Agree 61 2.57 1.15 0.15 2.28 2.87
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 3.73 1.49 0.45 2.73 4.73
Disagree 222 4.07 0.94 0.06 3.94 4.19
Strongly
Disagree 91 3.26 1.27 0.13 3.00 3.53
Total 400 3.64 1.22 0.06 3.52 3.76
Ease of Traffic
Flow
Agree 15 4.00 0.38 0.10 3.79 4.21
2.444 0.046
Strongly Agree 61 3.84 0.66 0.08 3.67 4.01
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 3.82 0.60 0.18 3.41 4.22
Disagree 222 4.07 0.73 0.05 3.98 4.17
Strongly
Disagree 91 4.12 0.33 0.03 4.05 4.19
Total 400 4.04 0.64 0.03 3.97 4.10
Ease of
Communication
Agree 15 4.67 0.49 0.13 4.40 4.94
6.723 0.001*
Strongly Agree 61 4.87 0.46 0.06 4.75 4.99
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 11 4.64 0.92 0.28 4.02 5.26
Disagree 222 4.17 1.42 0.10 3.98 4.35
Strongly
Disagree 91 3.97 0.84 0.09 3.79 4.14
Total 400 4.26 1.20 0.06 4.14 4.38
Source: Computed from primary data, *Significant at five per cent level
The calculated F value of 2.714, 47.760, 3.303, 16.541, 25.957, 2.444 and 6.723 to the above respective
variables of store location is significant at five per cent level. The value indicates that there is a significant
difference between qualities of service is important in the retail store and store location of the respondents. Hence,
the stated hypothesis of “there is no significant difference between qualities of service is important in the retail
store and store location of the respondents” is rejected.
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 49
PROMOTIONAL OFFER IS IMPORTANT FOR THE SHOPPING PREFERENCES OF THE
CUSTOMERS AND STORE LOYALTY
The following null hypothesis has been formulated and chi-square is applied to test the significant
association between promotional offer is important for the purchases of the respondents and retail store loyalty.
H02: "There is no significant association between the promotional offers is important in the purchase and store
loyalty”
Table 3: Promotional Offers and Store Loyalty
Count
I prefer this shop for my regular shopping
Total Not at all
important
Not
important
Moderately
important Important
Very
Important
Attractive
promotional offer is
important in the
purchases
Disagree 9 5 46 11 1 72
Neither Agree nor
Disagree 0 0 3 13 2 18
Strongly Agree 4 7 0 119 82 212
Agree 1 0 0 81 16 98
Total 14 12 49 224 101 400
Source: Primary data
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 293.352a 12 .000
Likelihood Ratio 267.607 12 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association 96.760 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. 8 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .54.
Source: Computed from Primary data
The calculated chi-square value of 293.352 is statistically significant. Hence, the stated hypothesis of “there
is no significant association between the promotional offers is important in the purchase and store loyalty” is
rejected.
Table 4: Promotional Offers and Store Loyalty
Count
I prefer to shop at this store even if another store Advertises some
deal Total
Not at all
important
Not
important
Moderately
important Important
Very
Important
Attractive
promotional offer
is important in the
purchases
Disagree 7 0 51 4 10 72
Neither Agree
nor Disagree 2 1 3 2 10 18
Strongly
Agree 29 54 3 37 89 212
Agree 55 9 1 6 27 98
Total 93 64 58 49 136 400
Source: Primary data
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 50
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 309.674a 12 .000
Likelihood Ratio 261.723 12 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association 7.142 1 .008
N of Valid Cases 400
a. 4 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.21.
Source: Computed from Primary data
The calculated chi-square value of 309.674 is statistically significant. Hence, the stated hypothesis of “there
is no significant association between the promotional offers is important in the purchase and store loyalty” is
rejected.
Table 5: Promotional Offers and Store Loyalty Count
I occasionally prefer this store for major shopping Total Not at all
important Not
important Moderately important
Important Very
Important
Attractive promotional offer is
important in the purchases
Disagree 0 0 0 54 18 72 Neither Agree nor Disagree
0 0 0 6 12 18
Strongly Agree 24 24 8 41 115 212 Agree 2 2 1 9 84 98
Total 26 26 9 110 229 400
Source: Primary data
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 141.673a 12 .000
Likelihood Ratio 141.976 12 .000 Linear-by-Linear
Association 2.830 1 .092
N of Valid Cases 400 a. 9 cells (45.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .41.
Source: Computed from primary data
The calculated chi-square value of 141.673 is statistically significant. Hence, the stated hypothesis of “there
is no significant association between the promotional offers is important in the purchase and store loyalty” is
rejected.
H03: There is no significant difference between education and service quality of the retail stores.
Table 6: ANOVA for Occupation with Customer Preferences and Service Quality of the Retail Stores
Occupation N Mean S.D. Std.
Error
95% Confidence F value Sig. Lower
Bound Upper Bound
Store loyalty
Agriculture 25.26 3.34 0.51 24.22 26.30 25.26
50.806 0.001*
Business men 26.46 1.32 0.18 26.11 26.82 26.46 Employed 29.83 2.85 0.21 29.42 30.23 29.83 House wife 24.77 3.33 0.44 23.89 25.66 24.77
Student and Others 27.28 3.33 0.46 26.37 28.20 27.28 Total 27.82 3.54 0.18 27.47 28.17 27.82
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 51
Store location
Agriculture 16.26 1.45 0.22 15.81 16.71 16.26
23.271 0.001*
Business men 13.89 1.44 0.19 13.51 14.28 13.89 Employed 15.94 2.53 0.18 15.58 16.30 15.94 House wife 13.33 2.06 0.27 12.79 13.88 13.33
Student and Others 14.62 2.40 0.33 13.96 15.29 14.62 Total 15.14 2.46 0.12 14.90 15.38 15.14
Customer perception
Agriculture 48.14 0.35 0.05 48.03 48.25 48.14
84.525 0.001*
Business men 59.25 2.18 0.29 58.66 59.84 59.25 Employed 48.09 5.44 0.39 47.32 48.87 48.09 House wife 45.42 1.24 0.16 45.09 45.75 45.42
Student and Others 48.36 6.08 0.84 46.68 50.04 48.36 Total 49.32 6.07 0.30 48.72 49.91 49.32
Customer satisfaction
Agriculture 41.93 1.77 0.27 41.38 42.48 41.93
35.636 0.001*
Business men 38.70 1.26 0.17 38.36 39.03 38.70 Employed 40.04 4.42 0.32 39.41 40.67 40.04 House wife 34.56 1.78 0.24 34.09 35.03 34.56
Student and Others 37.11 4.56 0.63 35.86 38.37 37.11 Total 38.88 4.21 0.21 38.47 39.29 38.88
Service quality Tangibility
Agriculture 18.43 1.17 0.18 18.06 18.79 18.43
33.393 0.001*
Business men 16.02 0.59 0.08 15.86 16.18 16.02 Employed 17.43 1.35 0.10 17.24 17.62 17.43 House wife 16.30 1.35 0.18 15.94 16.66 16.30
Student and Others 17.34 1.11 0.15 17.03 17.65 17.34 Total 17.17 1.40 0.07 17.03 17.30 17.17
Reliability
Agriculture 17.38 1.03 0.16 17.06 17.70 17.38
10.193 0.001*
Business men 15.48 1.04 0.14 15.20 15.76 15.48 Employed 15.59 3.01 0.22 15.16 16.02 15.59 House wife 17.35 0.79 0.10 17.14 17.56 17.35
Student and Others 16.38 2.74 0.38 15.62 17.13 16.38 Total 16.12 2.50 0.13 15.87 16.36 16.12
Responsiveness
Agriculture 18.81 1.23 0.19 18.42 19.19 18.81
89.732 0.001*
Business men 19.89 0.31 0.04 19.81 19.98 19.89 Employed 16.63 1.58 0.11 16.40 16.85 16.63 House wife 16.21 0.62 0.08 16.05 16.37 16.21
Student and Others 16.53 1.73 0.24 16.05 17.00 16.53 Total 17.24 1.86 0.09 17.06 17.42 17.24
Assurance
Agriculture 18.57 1.06 0.16 18.24 18.90 18.57
19.023 0.001*
Business men 19.54 1.56 0.21 19.12 19.95 19.54 Employed 21.02 2.36 0.17 20.68 21.35 21.02 House wife 19.68 0.93 0.12 19.44 19.93 19.68
Student and Others 21.08 2.43 0.33 20.40 21.75 21.08 Total 20.37 2.19 0.11 20.16 20.58 20.37
Empathy
Agriculture 26.14 0.35 0.05 26.03 26.25 26.14
53.688 0.001*
Business men 29.79 0.62 0.08 29.62 29.95 29.79 Employed 24.91 3.14 0.23 24.46 25.35 24.91 House wife 23.42 1.24 0.16 23.09 23.75 23.42
Student and Others 25.89 3.12 0.43 25.03 26.75 25.89 Total 25.64 3.11 0.16 25.33 25.94 25.64
Source: Computed from Primary data, *Significant at five per cent level
The calculated F value of store location (F 50.806), store loyalty (F 23.271), customer perceptions (F
84.525), and customer satisfaction (F 35.636) is significant at 5 per cent level. The value indicates that there is a
significant difference between the occupation and customer shopping preferences in the retail stores. Hence, the
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 52
stated hypothesis of “there is no significant difference between occupation and respondents shopping preference of
the retail stores” is rejected.
Similarly, the calculated value of service quality of tangibility (F 33.393) reliability (F 10.193),
responsiveness (F 89.732), assurance (F 19.023) and empathy (F 53.688) is also significant at five per cent level.
The value indicates that there is a significant difference between the occupation and service quality of the retail
stores. Hence, the stated hypothesis of “there is no significant difference between occupation and service quality of
the retail store” is rejected.
FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
The strategy for acquiring high value customers from competitors has the highest acceptance score of 3.85,
follows the differentiation and targeting the valuable new customers with acceptance score of 3.84 and
strategic identify and target new customer opportunities with acceptance score of 3.83 towards the
strategies of acquisition process in the retail sector. The respondents assign the least score for front line
employees‟ performance evaluations depend largely on how well they acquire new valuable customers
(mean 2.93) towards the strategies of acquisition process in the retail sector.
To retain valuable existing customers is seen by employees as essential for the unit‟s success, leaders
clearly defined mission driven by customer retention and a system to segment existing customers based on
their economic value is highest dominant factors followed for the customer retention with respective mean
score of 3.59, 3.48 and 3.44.
To maintaining relationships with existing valuable customers is viewed as more, management
communicates the importance of retaining the existing valuable customers and across the unit employees
agree that being able to retain valuable existing customers is the key to our competitive advantage with
respective mean score of 3.06, 2.96 and 2.49 towards the practices to be followed to customer retention
process in the retail industry.
There is a significant difference between type of retail industry and customer acquisition practices.
There is a significant difference between type of retail industry and customer retention practices.
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Customer retention strategies are not strictly independent of each other; value is function of not just price,
quality and service but can also be enhanced by personalization and offering a memorable experience.
Customers generally complain that full knowledge is not provided to them. Thus the retailer should
properly disclose the features of the product and services to the customers.
The retail sector is concerned they should make a careful study before making investments because the
need of the hour and biggest challenge is the retail space and the cost of rentals.
A maximum population residing in rural area in the Villupuram district and it is also observed that the
consumers are price sensitive.
The sales person retail selling is the major role to acquisition and retaining the customers. Retailers must
take pain to make sure that sales person are educated, trained, experiences, and helping nature, has a neat
and clean outlook and is cheerful knowledgeable.
The study reveals that the customer acquisition in the electronic sector is very low. Therefore, the
electronic products sellers need more attention on customer acquisition process.
The study also reveals that the retaining the customer is in the textiles is difficulty due change life style,
fashion etc, Hence, the textile industries is to provide wide range of products options with quality and
reasonable price.
International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXVI, February 2016, Print ISSN: 2347-937X
www.apjor.com Page 53
CONCLUSION
The present article concludes that, the customer acquisition and retention is the vital goal for every
business firms that emphasize on the relationships with customers. While the precise meaning and measurement of
customer retention can differ by industries and firms there appears to be a general agreement perceiving customer
retention is a tool to yield several economic benefits. Retained customers‟ purchases increasingly grow bigger
together with the referral they made during their lengthy tenure with the company. This results in a decrease in the
cost of maintaining relationships with customers. Customer retention is beyond satisfying and maintaining existing
customers. Hence, attention on this area is greatly needed in order to further improve the firm‟s performance. It is
believed that customer retention strategy will be a great management tool for retailers to survive and grow in the
very competitive retailing industry. The findings of this study in addition to the implications given are expected to
enlighten the practices of customer retention within retailing sector.
REFERENCES
1. Alexander, A.A & Muhlebach, R.F.(1992). Shopping Center Management, Institute of Real Estate
Management, Chicago – Illinois.
2. Connolly A and Firth D (1999), “Visual Planning - the Power of Thinking Visually”, The Journal of Brand
management, Vol.6, No. 5, 161-173.g, Vol. 21, July, 3 – 8.
3. Dutt, D.2004, „An outlook for Retailing in India, Vision2005‟ (Form a presentation by KSA Technopak at
MDI Gurgaon in January and February).
4. Kotler, Philip 2000, Marketing Management, 10th Ed., Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
5. Kuruvilla, S. J. and Ganguli, J. (2008), Mall development and operations: An Indian perspective, Journal
of Retail and Leisure Property, 7 (3), 204-215
6. Levy, Michel; and Weitz, Barton A. Retailing Management .New Delhi, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing
Company Limited, 2002.
7. Majumdar, S.2002, „FDI in retailing: India as a supermarket‟, Business Line, Tuesday, Sep17.
8. POPAI (2001), “In-Store Advertising Becomes a Measured Medium”, Survey
Report.(http://www.popai.com/frames/popmeas_research_fr.html)
9. Rajagopal (2009), Growing Shopping Malls and Behavior of Urban Consumers, Journal of Retail and
Leisure Property, 8 (2), 99-118
10. Sinha P K and Uniyal D P (2000) “Communication @ Point of Purchase”, Working Paper, Mudra Institute
of Communications, Ahmedabad.
11. Smith W R (1956), “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing
Strategies”, Journal of Marketing.