22
Current Literature Targeting the Allosteric Site of Oncoprotein BCR-ABL as an Alternative Strategy for Effective Target Protein Degradation ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 139, 6046. Evan Carder Wipf Group Current Literature November 18, 2017 11/18/17 1 Evan Carder @ Wipf Group N N S O O O HN O NH O O O N H F F Cl O N N N HN O N H Proteasomal degradation BCR-ABL BCR-ABL Ub Ub Ub Ub BCR-ABL E3 Ligase E2 Ub Ub

Current Literature Targeting the Allosteric Site of ...ccc.chem.pitt.edu/wipf/Current Literature/Evan_10.pdfNov 18, 2017  · Current Literature!! Targeting the Allosteric Site of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Current Literature!!Targeting the Allosteric Site of Oncoprotein BCR-ABL as an Alternative Strategy for Effective Target Protein Degradation!

!ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 139, 6046. !

Evan Carder!Wipf Group Current Literature!

November 18, 2017

11/18/17 1EvanCarder@WipfGroup

NNS

O

O O HN O

NHO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NHNO

NH

Proteasomal degradation

BCR-ABL BCR-ABL

UbUb

Ub

Ub

BCR-ABL

E3 Ligase

E2

Ub

Ub

11/18/17! 2EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Normal !chromosomal 9!

Normal !chromosomal 22!

break! translocation!

Transformed!chromosomal 9!

Transformed!chromosomal 22!

ABL!

BCR!

JCI 2007, 117, 2036.!Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 345. !

BCR-ABL!Fusion gene!

11/18/17! 3EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Transformed!chromosomal 22!

BCR-ABL!Fusion gene!

Cl

NH

O

N

S HN

N N

NN OH

Dasatinib

N

N

NH

N

NH

O

NN

Imatinib

N

CF3

HN

O

NNH

N

N

NNilotinib

ABL Tyrosine Inhibitors!

Constitutively-active !ABL tyrosine kinase!

Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 345. !

Pharmacology Models: Inhibition vs Degradation!

11/18/17! 4EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nat. Drug. Disc. 2017, 16, 101.!Cell Chemical Biology 2017, 24, 1181. !

§  Occupancy-driven pharmacology!

Stoichiometric activity!Mostly target active-site binding!Site occupancy to block function !Specificity defined by binding !

§  Event-driven pharmacology!

Sub-stoichiometric activity!Target active and allosteric sites!Additional layer of specificity !Restoration of function requires re-synthesis! !

Proteindegradation

Proteininhibition

no functional protein

Abnormal protein function

Event-drivenpharmacology

Occupancy-drivenpharmacology

Hea

lthy

Dise

ase

Protein Degradation - Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS)!

11/18/17! 5EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 679. !

ProteinSubstrate

Proteasomal degradation

E3 Ligase

Ub E2Ub

ProteinSubstrate

UbUb

UbUb

Ub

ProteinSubstrate E3 LigaseE3 Ligase

Tagged for !protein degradation!

Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras - PROTACs!

11/18/17! 6EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8554.!

POI E3 Ligase

POI Ligand

E3 LigaseLigand

PROTAC

Small-molecule-mediated Protein degradation:!

Proteasomal degradation

PROTAC

POI POI E3 Ligase

E2Ub

Ub

POI

UbUb

Ub

Ub

Targeting Protien of Interest!

11/18/17! 7EvanCarder@WipfGroup

ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 925.!Med. Princ. Pract. 2013, 22, 418. !Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2014, 54, 165.!

§  Orthosteric/Active Site Modulators!

Structurally similar to endogenous ligand!Employ rational drug design!Varying degrees of specificity!Highly susceptible to drug resistance !

!§  Nonothosteric/Allosteric Modulators!

Lack an endogenous ligand!Unique chemical structures!Elevated target selectivity!Reduced off-targets !Spatio-temporal specificity!Reduced susceptibility to drug resistance !

Nonorthosteric site

Orthosteric site

POI

Hypothesis – Application of an allosteric BCR-ABL PROTAC induces BCR-ABL protein degradation !

11/18/17! 8EvanCarder@WipfGroup

PROTAC AllostericABL Ligand

E3 LigaseLigand

ABL

E3 Ligase

E2

Ub

Ub

BCR-ABL protein degradation!Development of an allosteric BCR-ABL PROTAC!

Phase I! Phase II!

ABL Allosteric-site Inhibitors!

11/18/17! 9EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nature 2010, 463, 28.!Nature 2017, 543, 733. !

PDB: 5MO4

ABL

OFF

ClHN N N

HN N

OH

ABL001

OFF

FHN

N N O

NH2

GNF-2

ABL !Kinase

ATP-binding !site

Myristate!binding site

Target Myristate-binding site

E3-Ubiquitin Ligands!

11/18/17! 10EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nat. Drug. Disc. 2017, 16, 101.!

N

NO

ONHN

O

Nutlin-3aMDM2 Ligand

O

Cl

Cl

HO

ONH

O

OH

NH2

BestatincIAP Ligand

N

NH2

O

ONH

O

O

PomalidomideCRBN Ligand

N

OHO

HOO

HN

SN

VHL Ligand

IAPs!!MDM2!!Von Hippel-Lindau!!Cereblon!

!!

E3-Ubiquitin Ligase!E3 Ligase

OO

SN

N

ONH

OHN

4cIAP Ligand

Design of PROTAC!

11/18/17! 11EvanCarder@WipfGroup

PROTAC AllostericABL Ligand

E3 LigaseLigand

Linker

OOO

Ethylene glycol linkerOFF

ClHN N N

HN N

OH

ABL001 OO

SN

N

ONH

OHN

4cIAP Ligand

Structural Analysis of ABL001 bound ABL Kinase!

11/18/17! 12EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nature 2017, 543, 733. !

PDB: 5MO4

Positioning of the linker

solvent !exposed region

Surface view of ABL Kinase

ABL

OFF

ClHN N N

HN N

OH

ABL001

OO

SN

N

ONH

OHN

4cIAP Ligand

Structural Analysis of IAP Ligand !

11/18/17! 13EvanCarder@WipfGroup

J. Biological Chemistry 2017, 292, 4556.!J. Med. Chem. Article ASAP!Bioorg. & Medi.Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 2229.!

Positioning of the linker

PDB: 3GT9

Surface view of IAP

IAP

solvent !exposed region

PROTAC Development!

11/18/17! 14EvanCarder@WipfGroup

PROTAC

NNS

O

O O HN O

NHO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NHNO

NH

6

ABL Allosteric Ligand cIAP LigandLinker

Synthesis of the ABL Allosteric Ligand!

11/18/17! 15EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Nature 2010, 463, 28.!Nature 2017, 543, 733. !

1. SOCl2, DMF Toluene, 80 oC

2. DIPEA, THF -16 to rt, 77%

N

O

HO Br

Cl

O

NH2FF

Cl+

O

NH

FFCl O

N

Br

Cl

NH HCl

DIPEA, i-PrOH130 oC, 65%

O

NH

FFCl O

N

Br

N

NNB

O

O

O

Pd(PPh3)4, XPhos K3PO4, THF, H2O

100 oC, 92%

O

NH

FFCl O

N N

NN

O

LiOH, H2O

MeOH, rt, 55%

OO

O

O

O

O

O

NH

FFCl O

N N

NN

O

O

OHI

AllostericABL Ligand

Synthesis of the cIAP Ligand!

11/18/17! 16EvanCarder@WipfGroup

J. Biological Chemistry 2017, 292, 4556.!

NBoc

HOO

1. EDC, HOBt NH3 DMF, THF, 0 oC to rt

2. Lawesson’s reagent THF, 60 oC, 82%

NBoc

H2NS

BrO

OEt

O

1. A, EtOH, 60 oC

2. Boc2O, NaHCO3 H2O, THF 0 oC to rt, 89%

A

NBoc

NSEtO

O

1. NaOH, H2O, THF 60 oC, 82%

2. MeO(Me)NH HCl, EDC HOBt, DIPEA, DMF rt, 97%

NBoc

NSN

O

O

THF, -55 to -10 oC, 99%

THPO MgBr NBoc

NS

O

THPO1. HCl, MeOH, rt2. B, EDC, HOBt NaHCO3, THF 0 oC to rt3. K2CO3, MeOH H2O, 0 oC, 99%

NH

HO

O

Boc

B NNS

O

HOO HN Boc

HO

ONBoc

1. HCl, CPME THF, MeOH, rt2. C, EDC, HOBt DIPEA, DMF, rt3. K2CO3, MeOH H2O, 0 oC, 42%

C

NNS

O

HOO HN O

NBoc

E3 LigaseLigand

Synthesis of PROTAC – Compound 6 !

11/18/17! 17EvanCarder@WipfGroup

ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 1042.!

NNS

O

HOO HN O

NBoc K2CO3, DMF

50 oC, 75%

OTsO O OTs

NNS

O

OO HN O

NBocOOTsO

1. NH3, H2O EtOH, 100 oC

2. I, HATU, DIPEA MeCN, rt, 40%

NNS

O

O O HN O

NBocO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NNO

O

NH

TFA

rt, 50%

NNS

O

O O HN O

NHO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NHNO

NH

6

PROTAC

11/18/17! 18EvanCarder@WipfGroup

NNS

O

O O HN O

NHO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NHNO

NH

6

OO

SN

N

ONH

OHN

4 - LCL161 DerivativeE3 Ligand

OFF

ClNH N N

NH N3 - ABL001 DerivativeABL Ligand

O

O

11/18/17! 19EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Compound 6-induced BCR-ABL Protein Degradation!

Proteasomal degradation

BCR-ABL BCR-ABL

UbUb

Ub

Ub

BCR-ABL

E3 Ligase

E2

Ub

Ub

6

Compound 6 Effect on Cell Proliferation !

11/18/17! 20EvanCarder@WipfGroup

6

Summary!

11/18/17! 21EvanCarder@WipfGroup

§  Designed and developed an allosteric BCR-ABL PROTAC that potently induces BCR-ABL protein degradation in cell assays.!

Half-maximal degradation concentration (DC50): ~30 nM ! Maximum degradation efficacy (Dmax): ~70% between 100-300 nM!!Further developments:!!§  LCL161 derivative 4 induces auto-ubiquitination leading to IAP protein degradation !

§  Evaluation of compound 6 in in-vivo models!!

NNS

O

O O HN O

NHO

OO NHFF

Cl

O

NN

NHNO

NH

6

ABL Allosteric Ligand cIAP LigandLinker

Drugging the “Undruggable”!

11/18/17! 22EvanCarder@WipfGroup

Science 2017, 355, 1158.!

§  The RAS genes constitute the most frequently mutated oncogene family in cancer.!

§  Approximately ~25% of human tumors have a RAS mutation.!

§  Despite more than 30 years of effort to develop a pharmacologic inhibitor of RAS, a clinically effective anti-RAS therapy does not exist.!

§  What approach will prove to be the most effective RAS modulator? Which approach will produce the first clinical anti-RAS agent?!

Perhaps an allosteric RAS PROTAC to! induce RAS protein degradation?!!