Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Welcome to your CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018
This new platform provides an enhanced disclosure experience, with features and functionality to assist your pathway through the questionnaire.
The questions presented are specific to your company, and determined by your response to each question as you work through the questionnaire.
You will find a link to CDP’s reporting guidance and scoring methodology with each question. All companies are strongly advised to refer to the reporting guidance before completing each question. These
can also be accessed from the CDPwebsite.
If you have any questions or need help, please refer to 'Using CDP's online response system',or contact your account manager or email [email protected].
Page 1 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C0.1) Give a general description and
introduction to your organization.
≤ 5000
Start date End date
Indicate if you are
providing emissions
data for past reporting
years
Select the number of
past reporting years you
will be providing
emissions data for
01/01/2017 31/12/2017 No
C0. Introduction
This module requests information about your organization’s disclosure to CDP and will help data users to interpret your responses in the context of your business operations, timeframe and reporting
boundary.
The information provided here should apply consistently to your responses throughout the questionnaire and be complete and accurate as it may determine response options presented in
subsequent modules.C0.1
Cummins Inc., a global power leader, is a corporation of complementary business segments that design,
manufacture, distribute and service a broad portfolio of power solutions. The company’s products range
from diesel and natural gas engines to hybrid and electric platforms, as well as related technologies,
including battery systems, fuel systems, controls, air handling, filtration, emission solutions and electrical
power generation systems. Headquartered in Columbus, Indiana (U.S.A.), since its founding in 1919,
Cummins currently employs approximately 58,600 people committed to powering a more prosperous
world. Cummins serves customers in about 190 countries and territories through a network of some 500
company-owned and independent distributor locations and approximately 7,500 dealer locations.
Cummins earned $1 billion on sales of $20.4 billion in 2017. Press releases can be found on the Web at
www.cummins.com. Follow Cummins on Twitter at www.twitter.com/cummins and on YouTube at
www.youtube.com/cumminsinc.
C0.1
C0.2
(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
C0.2
Page 2 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C0.3) Select the countries/regions for which you
will be supplying data.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
C0.3
Afghanistan
Åland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Page 3 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
China, Macao Special Administrative Region
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d’Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czechia
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
Page 4 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
Holy See
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Page 5 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Laos, People’s Democratic Republic of
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia (Federated States of)
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Page 6 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova
Réunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Barthélemy
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin (French part)
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Page 7 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
State of Palestine
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan (Province of China)
Tajikistan
Thailand
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Timor Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland
United Republic of Tanzania
United States Minor Outlying Islands
United States of America
United States Virgin Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Viet Nam
Wallis and Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Page 8 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial
information disclosed throughout your
response.
USD
(C0.5) Select the option that describes the
reporting boundary for which climate-related
impacts on your business are being reported.
Note that this option should align with your
consolidation approach to your Scope 1 and
Scope 2 greenhouse gas inventory.
Zambia
C0.5
Zimbabwe
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
C0.3
C0.4
C0.4
C0.5
Operational control
Page 9 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-
related issues within your organization?
Yes
Position of individual(s) Please explain (≤ 1000)
Board Chair
C1. Governance
Board-level oversight of climate-related issues is considered best practice and provides an indication of the importance of climate-related issues to the organization.
This module is intended to capture the governance structure of your company with regard to climate change, and provides data users with an understanding of the organization's approach to climate-related issues
at the board level and below board-level.C1.1
C1.1
C1.1a
(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Row 1
N. Thomas (Tom) Linebarger serves
Cummins as both Chairman of the
Board and CEO. He views
environmental sustainability -
including product innovation and
facilities and operations - as an
important element of Cummins
business strategy. He is very
engaged in our sustainability work,
and meets at least once a year for 4
hours give his thoughts on
sustainability strategy and target
progress. in addition to regular
board updates every other month.
Page 10 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Other, please specify
Board committee
Frequency with which
climate-related issues
are a scheduled agenda
item
Governance mechanisms into which
climate-related issues are integrated Please explain (≤ 2400)
Row 2
The Safety, Environment and
Technology Committee is one of the
six committees of Cummins Board of
Directors. Members are are Robert
J. Bernhard, Franklin R. Chang Diaz,
Bruno V. Di Leo, Stephen B. Dobbs
(Chairman), Alexis M. Herman and
Karen H. Quintos. This Committee is
authorized to assist the Board of
Directors in its oversight of safety
policies, review environmental and
technological strategies, compliance
programs and major projects and
review public policy developments,
strategies and positions taken by
us with respect to safety,
environmental and technological
matters that significantly impact us
or our products. It met four times in
2017.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C1.1.
C1.1a
C1.1b
(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Page 11 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scheduled – all
meetings
Reviewing and guiding strategy
Yes
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
Yes
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
Yes
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
Yes
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
Yes
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
Yes
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
Yes
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Row 1
The Safety, Environment and
Technology Committee is one of
the six committees of Cummins
Board of Directors. Members are
are Robert J. Bernhard, Franklin R.
Chang Diaz, Bruno V. Di Leo,
Stephen B. Dobbs (Chairman),
Alexis M. Herman and Karen H.
Quintos. This Committee is
authorized to assist the Board of
Directors in its oversight of safety
policies, review environmental and
technological strategies,
compliance programs and major
projects and review public policy
developments, strategies and
positions taken by us with
respect to safety, environmental
and technological matters that
significantly impact us or our
products. It met four times in
2017.
New Row 1
Page 12 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
Page 13 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
Page 14 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Reviewing and guiding strategy No
Reviewing and guiding major plans
of action
No
Reviewing and guiding risk
management policies
No
Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
No
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
Page 15 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Reviewing and guiding business
plans
No
Setting performance objectives No
Monitoring implementation and
performance of objectives
No
Overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures
No
Monitoring and overseeing progress
against goals and targets for
addressing climate-related issues
No
Other, please specify No
Primary reason (≤ 1000)
Board-level oversight of
climate-related issues
will be introduced
within the next two
years Please explain (≤ 2400)
Name of the position(s)
and/or committee(s) Responsibility
Frequency of reporting
to the board on climate-
related issues
Chief Executive Officer
(CEO)
Both assessing and managing
climate-related risks and
opportunities
Quarterly
Other C-Suite Officer,
please specify
Chief Technical Officer
Both assessing and managing
climate-related risks and
opportunities
More frequently than
quarterly
Sustainability
committee
Both assessing and managing
climate-related risks and
opportunities
More frequently than
quarterly
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C1.1.
C1.1b
C1.1c
(C1.1c) Why is there no board-level oversight of climate-related issues and what are your plans to change this in the future?
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to C1.1.
C1.1c
C1.2
(C1.2) Below board-level, provide the highest-level management position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
New Row 1
New Row 2
Page 16 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C1.2a) Describe where in the organizational
structure this/these position(s) and/or
committees lie, what their associated
responsibilities are, and how climate-related
issues are monitored.
≤ 5000
(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the
management of climate-related issues, including
the attainment of targets?
Yes
Row 1
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
C1.2
C1.2a
N. Thomas (Tom) Linebarger serves Cummins as both Chairman of the Board and CEO. He views
environmentalsustainability - including product innovation and facilities and operations - as an important element of
Cummins business strategy. He is very engaged in our sustainability work, and meets at least once a year for 4 hours
give
his thoughts on sustainability strategy and target progress in addition to updates at regular board meetings every other
month.
The Environmental Sustainability program office reports up to the the Chief Technical Officer. As such, she is
responsible for reviewing sustainability plans and targets, particularly as they related to technology and innovation.
The Action Committee for Environmental Sustainability (ACES), formed in 2012, integrates climate change actions into
overall business strategy. The executive sponsor and the head of this group both report up through the Chief Technical
Officer. The group is the voice and catalyst for environmental action beyond compliance in the company and provides
tools and resources for employees go further and faster in reaching environmental goals. The corporate ACES team has
a global focus, involves all businesses and all functions and its structure of stakeholder areas is replicated all or in part
in each of the four major Company business units. The individual stakeholder and goal owner areas of ACES ensure that
all aspects of the environment and relevant areas of the business are included and data is collected and reported that
inform decision making and goal setting. A major outcome of the working group is that in June 2014, Cummins
announced that after several years of study and analysis, it had adopted a comprehensive environmental sustainability
plan and since announced 7 public goals. The group is currently developing the next sustainability plan, to be
announced in 2019.
C1.2a
C1.3
C1.3
C1.3a
(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues.
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Monetary reward
Page 17 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 3
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 4
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Energy reduction target
The seven public goals are part of the CEO's workplan, and he reports on the plan's progress to the Board of Directors
as part of his performance review. One of those 7 goals is a energy reduction target, a 32% energy intensity reduction
by 2020 from a base year of 2010.
Environment/Sustainability manager
Monetary reward
Energy reduction target
A key measure in Cummins’ Global Environmental Sustainability Plan is a commitment to transparency and
accountability. Environmental goals are now incorporated into the Quarterly Scorecard for the Cummins Leadership
Team’s review. The scorecard shows progress toward the facilities and operations waste, water, energy, and
greenhouse gas goals, products in use goal, and logistics goal. In each of these areas, the scorecard will show progress
on the both enterprise-wide goals as well as the progress toward the goal apportioned by each business unit and some
area business organizations (regional or country focused.) Progress toward goal achievement is part of an employee’s
work plan for the year and can result in monetary award through merit increases and meeting the company's ROANA
target, which results in a profit sharing bonus for all employees
Facilities manager
Monetary reward
Energy reduction target
A key measure in Cummins’ Global Environmental Sustainability Plan is a commitment to transparency and
accountability. Environmental goals are now incorporated into the Quarterly Scorecard for the Cummins Leadership
Team’s review. The scorecard shows progress toward the facilities and operations waste, water, energy, and
greenhouse gas goals, products in use goal, and logistics goal. In each of these areas, the scorecard will show progress
on the both enterprise-wide goals as well as the progress toward the goal apportioned by each business unit and some
area business organizations (regional or country focused.) Progress toward goal achievement is part of an employee’s
work plan for the year and can result in monetary award through merit increases and meeting the company's ROANA
target, which results in a profit sharing bonus for all employees
Energy manager
Monetary reward
Energy reduction target
Page 18 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 5
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
A key measure in Cummins’ Global Environmental Sustainability Plan is a commitment to transparency and
accountability. Environmental goals are now incorporated into the Quarterly Scorecard for the Cummins Leadership
Team’s review. The scorecard shows progress toward the facilities and operations waste, water, energy, and
greenhouse gas goals, products in use goal, and logistics goal. In each of these areas, the scorecard will show progress
on the both enterprise-wide goals as well as the progress toward the goal apportioned by each business unit and some
area business organizations (regional or country focused.) Progress toward goal achievement is part of an employee’s
work plan for the year and can result in monetary award through merit increases and meeting the company's ROANA
target, which results in a profit sharing bonus for all employees
All employees
Recognition (non-
monetary)
Efficiency project
Cummins has a global employee recognition framework called the mpact Awards. Employees who led a project,
employees who were involved with a project or employees who served as the project sponsor can self-nominate their
work and can be judged and then recognized their work represents an outstanding effort that supports overall business
goals. Beginning in 2017, there are now three different Impact Awards that employees can be recognized for: Business
Impact; Global Impact; Chairman’s Impact. One of the five award area categories is Environmental. Projects included in
this category can range from site facility projects to product design to projects in collaboration with a customer. Many
of these projects are climate related through greater energy efficiency or increased fuel economy.
Page 19 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Page 20 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 11
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 12
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Page 21 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 13
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 14
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 15
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 16
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 17
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Page 22 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 18
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 19
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 20
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 21
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 22
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Page 23 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 23
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 24
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 25
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
Types of incentives
Activity incentivized
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C1.3.
C1.3a
Page 24 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
From (years) To (years) Comment (≤ 2400)
0 3
0 - 100 0 - 100
3 10
0 - 100 0 - 100
10 30
0 - 100 0 - 100
(C2.2) Select the option that best describes how
your organization's processes for identifying,
assessing, and managing climate-related issues
are integrated into your overall risk management.
Frequency of monitoring How far into the future are risks considered? Comment (≤ 1000)
Six-monthly or more frequently >6 years
C2. Risks and opportunities
Evaluating exposure to climate-related risks and opportunities over a range of time horizons allows for a strategy for the transition to a low-carbon economy recognized in the Paris Agreement and UN SDGs. This module focuses on processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related issues as well as on the climate-
related risks and opportunities identified by your organization.
Many of the challenges you face when reporting on climate-related issues are common to other aspects of corporate reporting, requiring you to provide statements about your prospective condition. Some organizations, particularly accounting firms and their governing bodies, have published guidance about how to prepare
statements that contain forward-looking information.
Before completing the questions covering risks, you may wish to consult with your financial, legal, and/or compliance departments for advice on your company’s general approach to the provision of forward-looking statements and information concerning risks.C2.1
(C2.1) Describe what your organization considers to be short-, medium- and long-term horizons.
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
C2.1
C2.2
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes
C2.2
C2.2a
(C2.2a) Select the options that best describe your organization's frequency and time horizon for identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes” or “A specific climate change risk identification, assessment, and management process” in response to C2.2.
C2.2a
C2.2b
Page 25 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C2.2b) Provide further details on your
organization’s process(es) for identifying and
assessing climate-related risks.
≤ 5000
Relevance & inclusion Please explain (≤ 2400)
Relevant, always included
At a company level, the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) group, which reports to the Vice President Ethics, Compliance and Risk Management, maintains a risk map to identify all potential risks (and to an extent, potential
opportunities) the company faces, including strategic, operational, compliance and financial risks. We also assess climate related business risk to our own facilities and operations as part of our Enterprise Risk Management assessment
process.
Our risk assessment process, in alignment with the COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) framework, is focused on identifying and prioritizing risk events within the four categories of financial,
operational, strategic and compliance. This process identifies the most critical risks and action plans needed for mitigation.
We have developed standard risk taxonomy and risk assessment criteria and in 2014-2015, we conducted an extensive stakeholder interview process to capture voices across the organization on the potential risk events. This process,
which incorporates extensive stakeholder interviews, is designed to be conducted once every two to three years. In 2016, Cummins established an Enterprise Risk Council made up of the company’s top leaders who will manage
oversight of risk and provide direction on risk-related matters.
The new council is part of a framework designed to drive a culture of continuous improvement in risk management at Cummins, where risk is recognized and responded to appropriately. As part of the transformation, each company
leader has taken ownership of an individual risk that could impact profit and loss.
Cummins has performed global scenario planning work to understand how climate-related risks stand to impact the markets and customers we serve, and how these risks might impact our business. This scenario planning work was
performed in a manner similar to the widely publicized Shell scenario planning exercises, and a portion of this work focused on how climate change regulation might manifest globally, and the impact it would have on adoption rates of
new clean energy technologies and the economics of operating with fossil-fuel powered, electric, and hydrogen-fueled energy sources. It highlighted segments and regions where changes in our product investment strategy might be
needed, and “signposts” that will be monitored continuously as leading indicators of pending change that would accelerate or decelerate adoption of these technologies.
As the asset level, the function continued to help sites within Cummins develop Business Continuity Plans, outlining how they would operate when facing an emergency. More than 600 locations now have plans and many conducted
table-top exercises to test their effectiveness. The Enterprise Risk Management team also helped oversee more involved stress tests administered by a third party at the company’s 74 sites deemed most critical to Cummins’
operations.
Cummins' top risks are presented at each meeting of the Board of Directors; periodically a deep dive into specific risks is presented to the Board. In addition, once a year a state of Enterprise Risk Management update is provided to the
Board of Directors. The Board is engaged in the oversight of risk in many areas, including oversight of the enterprise risk management programs and oversight of critical enterprise risks. Although the overall governance of the ERM
program is monitored by the audit committee, details of the potential impact and mitigation activities for individual risks are reviewed in various sub-committees.
The Action Committee for Environmental Sustainability (ACES) also assesses risk related to climate change. This group takes a very structured and results-oriented approach to our 10 environmental sustainability principles developed
to meet the challenges of climate change (in addition to water and waste management) going forward - and part of the approach includes discussion and analysis about climate change risk and opportunities at its monthly meetings as
well as annual update to the Chairman and CEO.
This question only appears if you select “Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes” or “A specific climate change risk identification, assessment,and management process” in response to C2.2.
C2.2b
C2.2c
(C2.2c) Which of the following risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Current regulation
noise, including standards imposed by the EPA, the EU, state regulatory
agencies (such as the CARB) and other regulatory agencies around the
world. We have made, and will be required to continue to make,
significant capital and research expenditures to ensure our engines comply
with these emission standards. Developing engines and components to
meet numerous changing government regulatory
requirements, with different implementation timelines and emission
requirements, makes developing engines efficiently for multiple markets
complicated and could result in substantial additional costs that may be
difficult to recover in certain markets. In some cases, we are required to
develop new products to comply with new regulations, particularly those
relating to air emissions. While we have met previous deadlines, our ability
to comply with other existing and future regulatory standards will
be essential for us to maintain our competitive advantage in the engine
markets we serve. The successful development and introduction of new
and enhanced products in order to comply with new regulatory
requirements are subject to other risks, such as delays in product
development, cost over-runs and unanticipated technical and
manufacturing difficulties.
Page 26 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevant, always included
Relevant, always included
Relevant, always included
Relevant, always included
Emerging regulation
The nature and timing of government implementation and enforcement of
increasingly stringent
emission standards in emerging markets are unpredictable and subject to
change. Any delays in implementation or enforcement could result in the
products we developed or modified to comply with these standards
becoming unnecessary or becoming necessary later than expected
thereby, in some cases, negating our competitive advantage. This in turn
can delay, diminish or eliminate the expected return on capital and
research expenditures that we have invested in such products and may
adversely
affect our perceived competitive advantage in being an early, advanced
developer of compliant engines.
Technology
We are investing in new products and technologies, including electrified
powertrains, for planned introduction into certain existing and new
markets. Given the early stages of development of some of these new
products and technologies, there can be no guarantee of the future market
acceptance and investment returns with respect to these planned
products. The increased adoption of electrified powertrains in some
market segments could result in lower demand for current diesel or
natural gas
engines and components and, over time, reduce the demand for related
parts and service revenues from diesel or natural gas powertrains.
Furthermore, it is possible that we may not be successful in developing
segment-leading electrified powertrains and some of our existing
customers could choose to develop their own electrified or alternate fuel
powertrains, or source from other manufacturers, and any of these factors
could materially adversely impact our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Legal
Expenditures for environmental control activities and environmental
remediation projects at our facilities in the U.S. have not
been a substantial portion of our annual expenses and are not expected to
be material in 2018. We believe we are in compliance
in all material respects with laws and regulations applicable to our plants
and operations.
In the U.S., pursuant to notices received from federal and state agencies
and/or defendant parties in site environmental
contribution actions, we have been identified as a potentially responsible
party under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended or similar
state laws, at fewer than 20 waste disposal sites.
Market
Although we conduct market research before launching new or refreshed
engines and introducing new services, many factors both within and
outside our control affect the success of new or existing products and
services in the marketplace. Offering engines and services that customers
desire and value can mitigate the risks of increasing price competition and
declining demand, but products and services that are perceived to be less
than desirable (whether in terms of price, quality, overall value, fuel
efficiency or other attributes) can exacerbate these risks. With increased
consumer interconnectedness through the internet, social media and
other media, mere allegations relating to poor quality, safety, fuel
efficiency, corporate responsibility or other key attributes can negatively
impact our reputation or market acceptance of our products or services,
even if such allegations prove to be inaccurate or unfounded.
Page 27 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevant, always included
Not relevant, included
Relevant, sometimes included
Relevant, sometimes included
Reputation
Offering engines and services that customers desire and value can mitigate
the risks of increasing price competition and declining demand, but
products and services that are perceived to be less than desirable (whether
in terms of price, quality, overall value, fuel efficiency or other attributes)
can exacerbate these risks. With increased consumer interconnectedness
through the internet, social media and other media, mere allegations
relating to poor quality, safety, fuel efficiency, corporate responsibility or
other key attributes can negatively impact our reputation or market
acceptance of our products or services, even if such allegations prove to be
inaccurate or unfounded.
Acute physical
Climate-related risks that are physical in nature are typically water related.
We have not recognized any acute water risks. Potential for inadequate or
unreliable water supplies in the long-term horizons, which could lead to
operational disruptions, increased water pricing, investment in
contingency plans, and increased capital expenditures to manage growth
within water use allocation limits.
Chronic physical
Climate-related risks that are physical in nature are typically water related.
We have recognized some chronic but not acute water risks. Potential for
inadequate or unreliable water supplies in the long-term horizons, which
could lead to operational disruptions, increased water pricing, investment
in contingency plans, and increased capital expenditures to manage
growth within water use allocation limits.
Upstream
During 2017, we single sourced approximately 20 percent of the total
types of parts in our product designs, compared to approximately 56
percent in 2016. Any delay in our suppliers' deliveries may adversely affect
our operations at multiple manufacturing locations, forcing us to seek
alternative supply sources to avoid serious disruptions. Delays may be
caused by factors affecting our suppliers, including capacity constraints,
labor disputes, economic downturns, availability of credit, the impaired
financial condition of a particular supplier, suppliers' allocations to other
purchasers, weather emergencies, natural
disasters or acts of war or terrorism. Any extended delay in receiving
critical supplies could impair our ability to deliver products to our
customers and our results of operations.
Page 28 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevant, always included
(C2.2d) Describe your process(es) for managing
climate-related risks and opportunities.
≤ 5000
Primary reason Please explain (≤ 1500)
(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-
related risks with the potential to have a
substantive financial or strategic impact on your
business?
Yes
Downstream
Several of our engine customers, including PACCAR, Volvo , Navistar, Fiat
Chrysler, Daimler and Dongfeng, are truck manufacturers or OEMs that
manufacture engines for some of their own vehicles. Despite their own
engine manufacturing abilities, these customers have historically chosen to
outsource certain types of engine production to us due to the quality of
our engine products, our emission compliance capabilities, our systems
integration, their customers' preferences, their desire for
cost reductions, their desire for eliminating production risks and their
desire to maintain company focus. However, there can be no assurance
that these customers will continue to outsource, or outsource as much of,
their engine production in the future. In fact, several of these customers
have expressed their intention to significantly increase their own engine
production and to decrease engine purchases from us. In addition,
increased levels of OEM vertical integration could result from a number of
factors, such as shifts in our customers' business strategies, acquisition by
a customer of another engine manufacturer, the inability of third-party
suppliers to meet product specifications and the emergence of low-cost
production opportunities in foreign countries. Any significant reduction in
the level of engine production outsourcing from our truck manufacturer or
OEM customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
This question only appears if you select “Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes” or “A specific climate change risk identification, assessment, and management process” in response to C2.2.
C2.2c
C2.2d
As mentioned in 2.2b, we performed global scenario planning work to understand how climate-related risks stand to impact the markets and customers we serve, and how these risks might impact our business. This work “signposts”
that will be monitored continuously as leading indicators of pending change that would accelerate or decelerate adoption of these technologies, and this information is reviewed with our executive leadership team twice per year.
These signposts can be indicators of both risks and opportunities. Our Technology Planning function, under our Chief Technical Officer, leads this work, integrating input from our “sensing network” for Technical Developments,
Regulatory Developments, or Market/Economic Developments.
The scenario planning process was in part behind Cummins strategy to pursue electrified products and other low-carbon future options
The Action Committee for Environmental Sustainability did a hot spot environmental assessment in 2011 and the resulting data still informs our strategy and planning today. This group has been responsible for identifying
opportunities in responsible material consumption and in the creation of a Materials Lifecycle Management team whose objective is to find ways to use less material in the design and manufacture of our products.
In addition, Cummins in 2011 became a Ceres Aqua Gauge pilot company to understand the unique strategic aspects of our water use. That same year, a comprehensive water risk screen starts at all global company sites.
This question only appears if you select “Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes” or “A specific climate change risk identification, assessment, and management process” in response to C2.2
C2.2d
C2.2e
(C2.2e) Why does your organization not have a process in place for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks and opportunities, and do you plan to introduce such a process in the future?
C2.3
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “There are no documented processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related issues” in response to C2.2.
C2.2e
C2.3
Page 29 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Identifier Risk 1
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Medium-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium
Potential financial impact 100,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
C2.3a
(C2.3a) Provide details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Customer
Transition risk
Technology: Substitution of existing products and services with lower emissions
options
Market: Reduced demand for goods and/or services due to shift in consumer preferences
We are investing in new products and technologies, including electrified powertrains, for planned
introduction into certain existing and new markets. Given the early stages of development of some of
these new products and technologies, there can be no guarantee of the future market acceptance and
investment returns with respect to these planned products. The increased adoption of electrified
powertrains in some market segments could result in lower demand for current diesel or natural gas
engines and components and, over time, reduce the demand for related parts and service revenues from
diesel or natural gas powertrains.
About as likely as not
2017 revenue from our Engine business was $9.0 billion. Over the long term, the increased adoption of
electrified powertrains in some market segments could result in lower demand for current diesel or
natural gas engines and components and, over time, reduce the demand for related parts and service
revenues from diesel or natural gas powertrains. This financial impact represents a 2 percent loss of
current (not projected) revenue over the next 3 to 10 years (medium term).
Page 30 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 75,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Row 2
Identifier Risk 2
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Long-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium
Potential financial impact 100,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
For nearly 100 years, we have understood that our success is driven by our customers’ success and by
powering a more prosperous and sustainable world. Cummins has evaluated and continues to evaluate, a
range of alternative power system designs to ensure that we can provide our customers with the best
possible value proposition.
To succeed in the long-term, we will continue to innovate for our customers to bring them the right power
solution for their application, at the right time. We understand that to achieve both we have to
constantly innovate and be willing to critically examine everything we do.
Roughly 10 percent or $75 million of Cummins 'research and development budget is devoted specifically
to technology innovation that does not yet have a specific customer identified.
Customer
Transition risk
Reputation: Shifts in consumer preferences
Market: Reduced demand for goods and/or services due to shift in consumer preferences
Cummins, like companies in every industry, faces unprecedented change to traditional business
models and to the technologies and systems that powered the last 100 years. Potential
technology substitutions such as electric vehicles replacing internal combustion engines or an internet of
things instead of complex global supply chains are creating perhaps the greatest level of uncertainty that
our industry has ever faced.
About as likely as not
Page 31 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 75,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Row 3
Identifier Risk 3
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Long-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium-low
2017 revenue from our Engine business was $9.0 billion. Over the long term, the increased adoption of
electrified powertrains in some market segments could result in lower demand for current diesel or
natural gas engines and components and, over time, reduce the demand for related parts and service
revenues from diesel or natural gas powertrains. This financial impact represents a 2 percent loss of
current (not projected) revenue over the next 3 to 10 years (medium term).
Cummins is using a method known as scenario planning to contemplate different potential future
outcomes in order to make more informed decisions. Cummins’ objective in doing scenario planning is to
ensure that its investment portfolio is informed and contemplates all major scenarios that would impact
the business on an ongoing basis and that looks beyond our normal five year planning window.
Roughly 10 percent or $75 million of Cummins' research and development budget is devoted specifically
to technology innovation that does not yet have a specific customer identified.
Direct operations
Physical risk
Potential for inadequate or unreliable water supplies in the long-term horizons, which could lead to
operational disruptions, increased water pricing, investment in contingency plans, and increased capital
expenditures to manage growth within water use allocation limits. The regions we have identified are
China ( Hai Ho river basin); India (Krishna river basin); Mexico (Panuco river basin) and Brazil (Paraiba Do
Sul river basin).
More likely than not
Page 32 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 20,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 1,200,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 1
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Cummins conducted detailed watershed assessments to facilities identified as at risk. Overall, 46 percent
of Cummins operations are in water stressed areas. Financial implications would be periods of plant
inactivity or closure, loss of production and possible customer deadline ramifications. The $20 million
figure would represent the maximum amount of lost revenue due to a high estimate of 5-7 days of plant
shutdown due to lack of water for operations.
Management method varies by site, but can include continued water conservation measures in existing
operations, increase in water storage capacity, and deployment of low/no water use processes such as air
cooled chiller systems where warranted based upon facility water dependency. These systems increased
capital expenditure and increased operating costs related to higher energy use, but off-set the potential
risks associated with interruption of operations. However, Cummins is also using technologies such as
regenerative dynos to manage the costs associated with the energy impact. Also, Cummins has
developed goals that include community alignment .
Page 33 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 2
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 3
Identifier
Page 34 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 4
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Page 35 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 5
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Page 36 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 6
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 7
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Page 37 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 8
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 38 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 9
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Page 39 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 10
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 11
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 40 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 12
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 41 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 13
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 42 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 14
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 15
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 43 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 16
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 44 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 17
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 45 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 18
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 19
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 46 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 20
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 47 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 21
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 48 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 22
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 23
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 49 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 24
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 50 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 25
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 51 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 26
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 27
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 52 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 28
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 53 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 29
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 54 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 30
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 31
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 55 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 32
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 56 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 33
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 57 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 34
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 35
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 58 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 36
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 59 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 37
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 60 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 38
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 39
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 61 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 40
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 62 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 41
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 63 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 42
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 43
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 64 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 44
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 65 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 45
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 66 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 46
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 47
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Page 67 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 48
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Page 68 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 49
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Page 69 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 50
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the risk driver
occur?
Risk type
Primary climate-related risk driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Management method (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost of management 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Primary reason Please explain (≤ 2400)
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C2.3.
C2.3a
C2.3b
(C2.3b) Why do you not consider your organization to be exposed to climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your
business?
Page 70 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related
opportunities with the potential to have a
substantive financial or strategic impact on your
business?
C2.4
Yes
C2.4
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to C2.3
C2.3b
Page 71 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Identifier Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Medium-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium
Potential financial impact 100,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
C2.4a
(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Customer
Products and services
Development and/or expansion of low emission goods and services
Increased revenue through demand for lower emissions products and services
Cummins has been very public with its intent on introducing electrified products, as early as 2019. With
the unveiling of the Concept Class 7 Urban Hauler EV in 2017, Cummins introduced a state-of-the art
battery pack offering, redefining energy-efficiency and density capabilities for the EV market. The lighter,
denser battery design allows it to hold a longer charge for improved range and faster charging, reducing
down time. The concept truck design includes an Engine-Generator option for extended range
capabilities, allowing users to benefit from Cummins B4.5 or B6.7 engines, providing a major advantage
over today's hybrid systems. These engine options offer 50 percent fuel savings compared to today's
diesel hybrids with zero emissions.
More likely than not
2017 revenue from our Engine business was $9.0 billion. Medium duty truck and bus make up 28 percent
of engine business revenue and heavy duty truck 32 percent or $5.4 billion in revenue for both segments
The potential impact is represents a 2 percent gain of current (not projected) revenue over the next 3 to
10 years (medium term). due to acceptance of electrified products.
Page 72 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 500,000,000.00 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Row 2
Identifier Opp2
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
In early 2018, Cummins announced that the electrification business will be a new reporting segment
called Electrified Power (EPBU). The EPBU is led by Julie Furber, Executive Director – Electrified Power.
This segment posted its first quarter of results as part of Cummins Q1 2018 earnings.
By bringing together all of our company's electrification resources into a reporting segment, Cummins will
increase visibility of and accountability for our investments and performance in this growing market. The
EPBU is a start-up business in a quickly changing market landscape, and its formation better positions us
to maximize synergies, foster strategic alignment and coordinate in a more holistic fashion in
electrification. Moreover, the new EPBU demonstrates that Cummins is serious about being a leader in
electrified power, just as we are in diesel and natural gas.
In order to win in electrified power, we must create and own market leading positions in the key elements
and subsystems of the electrification network. With the recent strategic acquisitions of Johnson Matthey
Battery Systems, a primarily high-voltage battery designer, and Brammo, a primarily low-voltage battery
designer, Cummins now has capabilities across the entire range of electric storage. The battery pack
makes up more than 60 percent of the powertrain, and is where we find one
The $500 investment is over a three year period.
Direct operations
Resource efficiency
Page 73 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Medium-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium
Potential financial impact 100,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 1,000,000.00 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Row 3
Identifier Opp3
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Cummins has a climate-related opportunity in responsible material consumption. Seventy percent of a
product’s environmental footprint is determined during the earliest phases of the design process. The
earlier the company can incorporate innovative design for the efficient use of fuel and raw materials, the
greater its ability to reduce the environmental footprint of Cummins products both in their design and
use.
This opportunity includes Cummins functions / businesses of remanufacturing, packaging, advanced
manufacturing, material science and product design.
More likely than not
The financial impact is an estimate of long-term savings on raw material require d to manufacture our
products. Cummins estimates 95 percent of the materials used to produce the organization’s primary
products are non-renewable (primarily metals, but also oil and plastic). Cummins estimates it uses 900,00
metric tons of metal for one year’s production.
A Cummins team for material efficiency is working now on ways to make the company’s products more
eco-efficient in the future. Many of the concepts of the “circular economy” and its emphasis on reuse and
recycling are not new, but this team is connecting with the
various functions in charge of materials work at Cummins to elevate their importance.
The goal is to use the right amount of material in everything the company makes to avoid
unnecessary use of water and energy throughout a product’s lifecycle. That means using material
optimization tools to ensure structural integrity with minimized material and
specifying that raw material is finished as close as possible to the ending net shape
of the component. Packaging leaders at Cummins are working to better understand what metrics and
actions will drive consistent and environmentally sound packaging decisions. Their
goals for sustainable packaging solutions are to reduce packaging waste and increase reusable
solutions as well as the use of recyclable material.
The cost to realize is primarily related to additional employees required who have expertise in specialized
design optimization systems and software.
Supply Chain
Page 74 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Medium-term
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium-low
Potential financial impact 50,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Resilience
Cummins is committed to energy efficiency and renewable energy both for cost savings and resiliency.
We are currently working on our third energy efficiency / GHG reduction goal since 2006. We have
completed hundreds of energy projects in the last 12 years, now saving the company about $50 million
per year. We have also committed to have 40 sites certified to ISO 50001 energy standard by 2020. We
have two public goals : 1) energy intensity reduction of 32 percent by 2020 from a baseline of 2010 and
2) to increase renewable energy opportunities.
Virtually certain
We have estimated that our annual cost savings from energy efficiency projects (cumulative since 2006)
is $50 million per year.
Page 75 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 14,500,000.00 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Row 4
Identifier Opp4
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon Medium-term
Cummins employees in its Facilities and Operations Environmental Management group set strategy,
objectives and targets, which are carried out through the business units , at site level and through Global
Integrated Services. The company’s Enterprise Environmental
Management System (EMS), created in 2003, plays a critical role in Cummins’ global environmental
footprint reductions and other improvements. The company adopted a model that includes a common
framework to ensure a similar look, feel and fundamental approach throughout the organization. The
system has served as the framework for driving continual
improvement and efforts beyond compliance at Cummins operations around the world. Our employee
engagement program Environmental Champions includes energy as well as water and waste training .
And the Compnay also just completed our 5th June Environmental Month, with more than 2/3 of our
employees participating in some way in a site, community or personal action.
In 2017, Cummins announced that it had entered into a Virtual Power Purchase Agreement (VPPA) with
EDP Renewables North America to expand a wind farm in Northern Indiana. The expansion will add 75
megawatts, enough to power approximately 20,000 average Indiana homes, to the existing 600 megawatt
capacity at the Meadow Lake Wind Farm complex. When fully operational, the wind farm expansion will
generate renewable electricity equivalent to the amount Cummins uses at its Indiana facilities.
The $14.5 million is an our annual spend to achieve our 2020 plan; $12 million per year for energy
efficiency and $2.5 for onsite renewable energy.
Customer
Markets
Cummins capability in Micro-grids and Distributed Generation as a result of renewable energy goals and
improvement of grid resiliency can provide opportunities..
Page 76 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact Medium
Potential financial impact 250,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 10,000,000.00 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 1
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
More likely than not
2017 revenue in the Power Systems segment was $4.1 billion; power generation was 57 percent of that
total, or $2.4 billion. The potential impact would be an estimate of increasing revenue by 5 percent in
the power generation product line.
We are managing this by: 1) educating regulators about the positive aspects of combined heat and power
plus alternative gas units 2) developing the right microgrid business model that includes innovation
beyond the technology 3) educating regulators about using gen sets as a fast-ramping flexible
generation solution to address the volatility on the grid with higher penetration of intermittent renewable
energy. 4) advanced technology research (high efficiency gensets, power electronics) 5) strategic
partnerships with renewable energy companies and Independent Power Producers 6) new hybrid product
launches (already have for telecom applications) and 7) development of new business models that
combine natural gas generation (as opposed to diesel) for gird firming as a result of higher renewable
penetration
The cost to realize is per year;.
Page 77 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 2
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Page 78 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 3
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 4
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 79 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 5
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 80 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 6
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 7
Page 81 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 8
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 82 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 9
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 83 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 10
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 11
Page 84 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 12
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 85 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 13
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 86 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 14
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 15
Page 87 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 16
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 88 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 17
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 89 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 18
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 19
Page 90 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 20
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 91 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 21
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 92 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 22
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 23
Page 93 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 24
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 94 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 25
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 95 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 26
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 27
Page 96 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 28
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 97 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 29
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 98 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 30
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 31
Page 99 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 32
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 100 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 33
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 101 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 34
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 35
Page 102 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 36
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 103 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 37
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 104 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 38
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 39
Page 105 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 40
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 106 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 41
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 107 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 42
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 43
Page 108 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 44
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 109 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 45
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 110 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 46
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 47
Page 111 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 48
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Page 112 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 49
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Page 113 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
New Row 50
Identifier
Where in the value chain does the opportunity
occur?
Opportunity type
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Type of financial impact driver
Company- specific description (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Time horizon
Likelihood
Magnitude of impact
Potential financial impact 0 - 999999999999
Explanation of financial impact (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Strategy to realize opportunity (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Cost to realize opportunity 0 - 99999999999
Comment (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C2.4.
Page 114 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Primary reason Please explain (≤ 2400)
Impact Description (≤ 2400)
Impacted
C2.4a
C2.4b
(C2.4b) Why do you not consider your organization to have climate-related opportunities?
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “No” or “Yes, we have identified opportunities but are unable to realize them” in response to C2.4.
C2.4b
C2.5
(C2.5) Describe where and how the identified risks and opportunities have impacted your business.
Products and services
Description of impact:
over time climate-
related opportunities
could change our
business mix,. We
produce many lower
carbon and alternative
fuel technologies now,
so future impact would
be what mix of products
our customers require.
Magnitude: Medium,
as while change may
decrease revenue in
some products, it could
increase in others
Page 115 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impacted for some
suppliers, facilities, or
product lines
Impacted for some
suppliers, facilities, or
product lines
Impacted
Supply chain and/or value chain
Description of impact:
Impact would be on
amount of materials
sources for production
Magnitude: over time,
material costs could go
down.
Adaptation and mitigation activities
Description of impact:
Carbon footprint
reduction due to virtual
power purchase
agreement.
Magnitude: We
continue to explore this
type of contract, so our
footprint could continue
to shrink by applying
the renewable energy
credits
Investment in R&D
Description of impact:
Three quarters of
Cummins research and
development spending
is related to fuel
economy and / or low
carbon technology. The
percentage of that will
likely to grow.
Magnitude: Neutral to
slightly higher..
R&SD will
continue to fluctuate
depending on market
and customer needs.
Page 116 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impacted
Relevance Description (≤ 2400)
Impacted
Operations
Description of impact:
Monetary savings
Magnitude: Our energy
spend is 10 percent of
net income. We
anticipate that as we set
new energy reduction
goals, we will continue
to save costs.
Other, please specify
C2.5
C2.6
(C2.6) Describe where and how the identified risks and opportunities have factored into your financial planning process.
Revenues
Description of impact:
over time climate-
related opportunities
could change our
business mix, and by
extension our revenue.
We produce many
lower carbon and
alternative fuel
technologies now.
Magnitude: Medium,
as while change may
decrease revenue in
some products, it could
increase in others
Page 117 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impacted
Impacted
Impacted
Operating costs
Description of impact:
We expect that
operating costs could be
maintained or even
lowered even as
revenue rises due to
efficiencies in plant
operations.
Magnitude: low
Capital expenditures / capital allocation
Description of impact:
Our run rage of $12
million per year for
energy efficiency has
been constant for the
past 5 years. We may
need to continue to hire
technical expertise in
expanded product lines.
Magnitude: low
Acquisitions and divestments
Description of impact:
In the past year,
Cummins has acquired
two battery storage
companies as well as a a
company that designs
and produces hybrid
and fully-electric power
solutions for
commercial markets
Magnitude: A small
but strategic magnitude
as these acquisitions as
to our knowledge base.
Page 118 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
We have not identified
any risks or
opportunities
Access to capital
Cummins has a strong
cash position. On
August 8, Cummins
announced that it has
entered into an
accelerated share
repurchase (ASR)
agreement with
Goldman, Sachs &
Co. LLC (GS&Co.)
to repurchase $500
million of Cummins’
common stock. The ASR
is part of Cummins’
previously announced
share repurchase plans
authorized by the Board
of Directors and is
consistent with the
company’s plans to
return 75 percent of
Operating Cash Flow to
shareholders in 2018.
Page 119 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impacted for some
suppliers, facilities, or
product lines
Not yet impacted
Assets
Description of impact:
There may be a slight
increase in updating
plant assets (building
and equipment) but
much is considered a
climate related
opportunity would be
investments we would
already make.
Magnitude: Low
impact, as much of our
spending on assets is
already considered part
of our climate change
strategy.
Liabilities
Description of impact:
Cummins response to
climate change - in
strategy, spending and
product offering is
Magnitude:
Other
C2.6
Page 120 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C3.1) Are climate-related issues integrated into
your business strategy?
Yes
(C3.1a) Does your organization use climate-
related scenario analysis to inform your business
strategy?
(C3.1c) Explain how climate-related issues are
integrated into your business objectives and
strategy.
≤ 7000
Climate-related scenarios Details (≤ 4000)
Other, please specify
Cummins Scenario Planning
C3. Business Strategy
CDP data users are interested in organizations’ forward-looking strategies and financial decisions that are driven by climate-related future market opportunities, public policy objectives, and corporate responsibilities. This module allows organizations to disclose whether they have acted upon integrating climate-related issues in to their business strategy. The module includes questions on scenario analysis and transition planning
which are important evolutions in strategic environmental planning.
Given the importance of forward-looking assessments of climate-related risks and opportunities, scenario analysis is an important and useful tool for an organization to use, both for understanding strategic implications of climate-related risks and opportunities, and for informing stakeholders of how the organization is positioning itself in recognition of these issues. It also can aid investors, lenders, and insurance underwriters in
informing their own financial decision making.
Transition planning is also an important evolution of strategic environmental planning, and includes all the relevant changes that need to be made to the company’s business model before the company can adjust to a low-carbon future. This is especially relevant for companies operating in high impact sectors.
Climate-related scenario analysis and transition planning disclosure was piloted by CDP in the Assessing Low-Carbon Transition (ACT) initiative in 2016. Further information on conducting and disclosing scenario analysis can be found in CDP Technical Note on Scenario Analysis .C3.1
C3.1
C3.1a
Yes, qualitative and quantitative
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C3.1.
C3.1a
C3.1c
Cummins believes that addressing climate change and managing our limited natural resources does not have to be at odds with our business objectives. In fact, we have demonstrated time and again that what is good for the environment is also good for our business and our customers. Cummins recognizes that the global need to
decarbonize the economy will be one of the major trends impacting our business over the next several decades.
Cummins has used scenario planning (as described in the next response) to ensure that the company is looking out far into the future to anticipate and respond to changing indicators, including climate change science, regulations, and societal requirements to mitigate and adapt to climate change. One example of a changing indicator that
Cummins monitors is the Paris Agreement and the related NDCs that nations have pledged. While the passage of the Paris Agreement did not change Cummins’ business strategy because we were already on a trajectory to reduce carbon emissions, the NDCs provide much more certainty about when and how nations plan to cut their own
emissions. As nations ratchet up their mitigation efforts in their NDCs, Cummins will ensure that our strategy is aligned to those NDCs and other frameworks including the Science Based Targets Initiative.
Scenario planning has already helped accelerate Cummins’ voluntary sustainability actions and this practice ensures an even closer connection between our environmental strategy and our business strategy. For example, in 2017, Cummins signed on to the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTI) that uses environmental science to support
companies with GHG reduction target setting, consistent with limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius or lower.
In the past year, Cummins has greatly expanded our investment in new electrified powertrain products. This $500 million investment included three acquisitions since February 2017. Cummins acquired two battery companies, Brammo and Johnson Matthey Battery Systems, and a hybrid powertrain company, EDI. Similarly, the investment
also means greater R&D and partnerships to improve electrified powertrains and related components including with independent research labs like the Battery Innovation Center. This expanded focus on electrified products is in addition to the nearly ¾ of Cummins R&D budget that is already spent on improvements related to fuel
efficiency across all of our products.
Cummins’ primary climate-related motivation for this focus on electrification and fuel efficiency is the growth opportunities presented by the demand for these lower carbon products globally. Secondarily, Cummins foresees regulatory changes at international, national, and sub-national levels eventually driving new requirements and fuel
economy regulations to which Cummins will continue adapting its business strategy and product choices to meet the requirements For example, as cities around the world set their own emissions targets and technology mandates, Cummins will adapt to meet those customer needs with clean technology options. In these instances, it is
clear that the companies with the cleanest products paired with the greatest ability to service and support the transition to these new technologies will gain a competitive advantage.
Based on current trends and informed by our own direct engagement with regulatory agencies around the world, Cummins believes that emissions standards and GHG/fuel economy standards will continue to progress around the world across all of our product groups. On-highway Class 8 engines and vehicles are typically the first group of
products to see new and more stringent standards. The baseline varies considerably depending on the region implementing a new standard, but we do expect and support greater harmonization of standards as some markets already adopt US EPA or European emissions standards. The progression of these standards globally combined
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C3.1.
C3.1c
C3.1d
(C3.1d) Provide details of your organization’s use of climate-related scenario analysis.
Row 1
Cummins uses a method known as scenario planning to contemplate different potential future outcomes in
order to make more informed decisions. Cummins’ objective in doing scenario planning is to ensure that its
investment portfolio is informed and contemplates all major scenarios that would impact the business on an
ongoing basis and that looks beyond a short term planning window. Scenarios were developed out to 2035 as
a reasonable outlook and timeframe.
To do this, Cummins first identified the driving forces behind major changes in the world and the critical
uncertainties within each. Based on the themes of those critical uncertainties, plausible scenarios were
developed to weave a narrative of potential futures. The three themes that Cummins considered in its
scenarios were Climate Change and Carbon Regulations, Evolution of Advanced Technologies, and Economic
De-globalization. Potential outcomes and implications to Cummins’ business were then analyzed to
understand when and how the most extreme disruptions might occur over time. In simple terms, Cummins
repeatedly asked itself, “what if?” to expose the greatest uncertainties about the future.
One scenario that Cummins uses through this planning exercise is a climate-related scenario in which
countries around the world take aggressive and globally orchestrated steps to decarbonize their economies.
Cummins used a climate-related scenario to understand the extreme limits and major drivers of action within
this scenario out to 2035; anything less extreme would be compared to a baseline assumption of how this
scenario might play out.
Scenario planning has already helped accelerate Cummins’ voluntary sustainability actions and this practice
ensures an even closer connection between our environmental strategy and our business strategy. For
example, in 2017, Cummins signed on to the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTI) that uses environmental
science to support companies with GHG reduction target setting, consistent with limiting global warming to 2
degrees Celsius or lower.
To keep that analysis relevant, Cummins must continually monitor and respond accordingly to changes against
key indicators. Cummins does not view scenario planning as a one-time activity. Rather, it must be used as tool
on an ongoing basis to account for real world changes that occur to inform the potential futures that are yet
to come. For this reason, Cummins developed a "Signpost Monitoring Process" with assigned owners to key
signposts or indicators that are considered most critical to the scenarios. Cummins uses a broad network of
external experts and information sources to monitor signposts. Twice a year, signpost owners are required to
Page 121 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Nationally determined contributions (NDCs)
Other, please specify
Shell Scenarios
(C3.1f) Why are climate-related issues not
integrated into your business objectives and
strategy? ≤ 5000
(C3.1g) Why does your organization not use
climate-related scenario analysis to inform your
business strategy? ≤ 5000
Row 2
Cummins supports the framework of the Paris Agreement and believes that it gives the world a flexible
framework to manage climate change while providing a smooth transition for business. American companies,
our suppliers, customers, and communities will benefit from U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement in
several ways:
oIt strengthens our competitiveness in global markets.
oIt benefits American manufacturing as we modernize to new, more efficient technologies.
oIt supports investment by setting clear goals which enable long-term planning.
oIt expands global and domestic markets for clean, energy-efficient technologies which will generate jobs
and economic growth.
oIt encourages market-based solutions and innovation to achieve emissions reductions at low cost.
Cummins uses Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by each signatory nation through the
framework of the Paris Agreement as one input into the Cummins Scenario Planning process. NDCs are a
valuable indicator for how ambitious a nation may be in its commitment to mitigate GHG emissions. For this
reason, Cummins uses the NDCs and other projections to inform our scenario planning. Because NDCs must
undergo an emissions stock-taking and must ratchet up their pledges on five-year cycles, they provide a
regular and predictable view for Cummins to understand how a given nation is progressing against its goals,
and thus how Cummins may need to shift our own efforts to align to those targets. Cummins has a process in
place and internal subject matter experts identified who are responsible for monitoring climate change policy
development globally, including the tracking of NDCs. While the initial submission of NDCs in 2015 still
present an "ambition gap" that will not achieve the stated mitigation goal of a 2 degree C warming scenario,
Cummins uses NDCs as a baseline of what nations are likely to achieve.
Row 3
As part of Cummins' own scenario planning process, the company benchmarked Shell as an example of how to
use scenario planning to inform investment decisions and future business conditions. Cummins uses Shell
Scenarios to understand various methods of conducting scenario planning analysis and how to treat various
inputs. Cummins does not use Shell Scenarios as a prediction, rather, the Shell Scenarios are one reference
point for Cummins as a peer company that uses scenario planning.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes, qualitative”, “Yes, quantitative” or “Yes, qualitative and quantitative” in response to C3.1a.
C3.1d
C3.1f
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to C3.1.
C3.1f
C3.1g
This question only appears if you select “No, but we anticipate doing so in the next two years” or “No, and we do not anticipate doing so in the next two years” in response to C3.1a.
C3.1g
Page 122 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was
active in the reporting year?
Row 1
Target reference number Abs 1
Scope
% emissions in Scope 100.00 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 1.60 0 - 100
Base year 2014 1900 - 2018
Start year 2015 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e)
914,000,000.00
0 - 999999999999
Target year 2020 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 97.00 0 - 100
Target status Underway
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
C4. Targets and performance
Questions in this module focus on emission targets, additional climate-related targets, details on emission reduction initiatives and low carbon products.
Target setting provides direction and structure to environmental strategy. Providing information on quantitative targets and qualitative goals, and progress made against these targets, can demonstrate
your organization’s commitment to improving climate-related issues management at a corporate level. This information is relevant to investors’ understanding of how your company is addressing and
monitoring progress regarding the risks and opportunities disclosed.
Questions on emission reduction initiatives allow CDP data users to understand the organization’s commitment to reducing emissions beyond business-as-usual scenario.
Questions on low-carbon products provide valuable information to investors who are seeking to increase their investment in companies providing low-carbon and climate resilient goods and services.C4.1
Both absolute and intensity targets
C4.1
C4.1a
(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Scope 3: Use of sold products
No, but we anticipate setting one in the next 2 years
Cummins fuel economy teams throughout the world have implemented more than 200 projects since this
goal was announced in 2014. The result is that Cummins has already achieved a 3.4 million metric ton annual
run rate of CO2 reduction toward the company’s goal of a 3.5 million metric ton run rate per year. This
equates to a goal of 15 million metric tons from baseline year or 1.6 percent. In 2017, the estimated use of
sold products emissions amounted to 1,000,000,000 metric tons CO2e.
Page 123 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Page 124 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Target reference number
Scope
Page 125 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Page 126 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Page 127 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Target reference number
Page 128 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from base year 0 - 100
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Base year emissions covered by target (metric
tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Page 129 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 1
Target reference number Int 1
Scope
% emissions in Scope 95.50 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 32.00 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 2010 1900 - 2018
Start year 2010 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e)
0.00679
0 - 999999999999
Target year 2020 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 100.00 0 - 100
Target status Underway
This question only appears if you select “Absolute target” or “Both absolute and intensity targets” in response to C4.1.
C4.1a
C4.1b
(C4.1b) Provide details of your emissions intensity target(s) and progress made against those target(s).
Scope 1 +2 (market-based)
Metric tons CO2e per unit hour worked
No, but we anticipate setting one in the next 2 years
Page 130 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions
10.00
-999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions
-1.60
-999 - 999
New Row 1
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Cummins in 2016 approved its third energy goal in 10 years after exceeding its second energy and
greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goal in 2015. The current goal’s intensity factor is based on hours worked,
not revenue as previously used. All consolidated operations and joint ventures subscribing to Cummins’
Enterprise Environmental Management System are included. However, emissions associated with
generation of sold electricity (as part of the power solutions business) and mobile sources (emissions
associated with onroad vehicles) are not included in the goals. Additionally, it is assumed that 2010 market
based emissions to be the same as location based emissions. During the same period (2010 to 2020), based
on the hours forecast, a 10% increase in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions is anticipated. For Scope 3 emissions,
the absolute reductions amount to 1.6 percent as the goals are already in absolute terms
Page 131 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 2
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 3
Target reference number
Page 132 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 4
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Page 133 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 5
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Page 134 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 6
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Page 135 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 7
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 8
Target reference number
Page 136 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 9
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Page 137 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
New Row 10
Target reference number
Scope
% emissions in Scope 0 - 100
% reduction from baseline year 0 - 100
Metric
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Normalized baseline year emissions covered by
target (metric tons CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
Page 138 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target year 2000 - 2100
Is this a science-based target?
% achieved (emissions) 0 - 100
Target status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2
emissions -999 - 999
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3
emissions -999 - 999
Primary reason
Five-year forecast (≤
2400) Please explain (≤ 2400)
Row 1
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 2010 1900 - 2018
Start year 2016 1900 - 2018
Target year 2020 2000 - 2100
This question only appears if you select “Intensity target” or “Both absolute and intensity target” in response to C4.1.
C4.1b
C4.1c
(C4.1c) Explain why you do not have emissions target and forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years.
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “No target” in response to C4.1.
C4.1c
C4.2
(C4.2) Provide details of other key climate-related targets not already reported in question C4.1/a/b.
Energy productivity
Total Energy [MMBtu]
Total Hours Worked
Page 139 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI in baseline year 0.10600 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0.07200 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 79.50 0 - 100
Target Status Underway
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
Row 2
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 2010 1900 - 2018
Start year 2010 1900 - 2018
Target year 2020 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0.00000 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 40.00000 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 70.00 0 - 100
Target Status Underway
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
This energy intensity reduction target applies to all global facilities and operations under Cummins
management control.
This includes 90% of the emissions target. Scope 1 items that are excluded from the targets include
emissions associated with Generation of sold electricity, Mobile sources and Refrigerant.
No, it's not part of an overarching initiative
Energy productivity
ISO 50001 Certified Sites
This ISO 50001 certification target applies to all global facilities and operations under Cummins management
control.
Not applicable
Page 140 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 1
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 2
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
No, it's not part of an overarching initiative
Page 141 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 3
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
Page 142 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 4
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 5
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
Page 143 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 6
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 7
Target
Page 144 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 8
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
Page 145 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 9
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 10
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
Page 146 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 11
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Page 147 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 12
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 13
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Page 148 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 14
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 149 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 15
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 16
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Page 150 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 17
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 151 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 18
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 19
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Page 152 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 20
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
Page 153 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 21
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 22
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
Page 154 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 23
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 24
Target
Page 155 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
New Row 25
Target
KPI – Metric numerator (≤ 200) ≤ 200
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
(≤ 200) ≤ 200
Base year 1900 - 2018
Start year 1900 - 2018
Target year 2000 - 2100
KPI in baseline year 0 - 999999999999
KPI in target year 0 - 999999999999
Page 156 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% achieved in reporting year 0 - 100
Target Status
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Part of emissions target (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives
that were active within the reporting year? Note
that this can include those in the planning and/or
implementation phases.
Yes
Number of projects
Total estimated annual
CO2e savings in metric
tonnes CO2e (only for
rows marked *)
98.00 25,000.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0.00 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0.00 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
94.00 23,918.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
4.00 875.00
C4.2
C4.3
C4.3
C4.3a
(C4.3a) Identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings.
Under investigation
To be implemented*
Implementation commenced*
Implemented*
Not to be implemented
Page 157 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Row 1
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
217.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
40,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
326,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 16-20 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 2
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
3,767.00
0 - 99999999999
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C4.3.
C4.3a
C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Energy efficiency: Building fabric
Other, please specify
Efficient Glazing
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
This includes 2 projects
Energy efficiency: Processes
Page 158 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope
No
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
593,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
1,737,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 11-15 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 3
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
1,702.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
32,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
110,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 11-15 years
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
This is includes 17 projects globally
Energy efficiency: Processes
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 159 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 4
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
2,534.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
424,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
1,400,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 11-15 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 5
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
8,412.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
Yes
Yes
No
This includes 4 projects
Energy efficiency: Building services
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
This includes 20 projects globally
Energy efficiency: Building services
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Page 160 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
1,462,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
3,917,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 6-10 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 6
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
4,408.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
589,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
2,234,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 6-10 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 7
Activity type
Select all that apply:
This includes 21 projects globally
Energy efficiency: Building services
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
This includes 12 projects
Energy efficiency: Building services
Page 161 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
1,494.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
221,000
0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
519,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 6-10 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Row 8
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e)
788.00
0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
Yes
Yes
No
Voluntary/Mandatory Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4)
138,000
0 - 999999999999
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
This includes 11 projects
Low-carbon energy installation
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 162 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4)
1,019,000
0 - 999999999999
Payback period 4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative 21-30 years
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 1
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 2
Activity type
Description of activity
This includes 2 projects
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 163 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 3
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 164 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 4
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 5
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Page 165 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 6
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 166 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 7
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 8
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 167 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 9
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 10
Activity type
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 168 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 11
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 169 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 12
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 13
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 170 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 14
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 171 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 15
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 16
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Page 172 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 17
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 18
Activity type
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 173 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 19
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 174 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 20
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 21
Activity type
Description of activity
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 175 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 22
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 176 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 23
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 24
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 177 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
New Row 25
Activity type
Description of activity
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes
CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Scope
No
No
No
No
Voluntary/Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as
specified in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Investment required (unit currency – as specified
in CC0.4) 0 - 999999999999
Payback period
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 178 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 1500) ≤ 1500
Method Comment (≤ 2400)
Dedicated budget for
energy efficiency
Internal price on carbon
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C4.3.
C4.3b
C4.3c
(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?
Row 1
Since 2007, Cummins
has implemented an
energy efficiency capital
fund to finance energy-
related projects.
Cummins has a
comprehensive
investment plan
designed to achieve the
Company’s 2015 energy
and GHG intensity goals,
as well as the new 2020
energy and GHG
intensity goals. In 2017,
Cummins used this fund
to complete 94 capital
projects, with a total
investment of $11.5
million and annual cost
savings of $3.6 million.
Row 2
$7 per metric ton CO2e
Page 179 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Dedicated budget for
other emissions
reduction activities
Row 3
A central budget is
provided to fund
corporate energy and
GHG initiatives, including
the Cummins
Environmental
Champion program
(updated Energy
Champion program
integrating Water and
Waste) and
implementing ISO 50001
across the Cummins
Enterprise. Cummins
2020 goal is to certify 40
sites and by end of 2017
has 28 sites globally
certified to ISO 50001. In
addition, Cummins has a
dedicated budget of $2.5
million for onsite
renewable energy
installations.
Page 180 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Employee engagement
Financial optimization
calculations
Row 4
In 2017, Cummins
continued its successful
Environmental
Champions program.
Environmental
Champions take 32
hours of training over
five days. Conformance
with this program is a
requirement for the 50
priority sites that
comprise 90 percent of
Cummins environmental
footprint. In addition,
Cummins issues internal
newsletters and blogs,
and conducts company-
wide June
environmental month
activities.
Row 5
Cummins uses a model
of the internal rate of
return to establish a
baseline IRR for funded
energy efficiency
projects. Use of common
financial analysis tools
and calculators.
Page 181 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Internal
incentives/recognition
programs
Partnering with
governments on
technology development
Row 6
Cummins has conducted
company-wide
environmental awards
since 2005, called the
Chairman’s
Environmental Awards
program. Each year,
sites are encouraged to
submit applications for
the awards, using a
common template and
judged by a panel of
Cummins energy and
environmental leaders.
Award winners are
honored through
company
communications, and by
attending a recognition
dinner with senior
leaders and the
Cummins Board of
Directors.
Row 7
The company's recent
portfolio of government
co-funded technology
development and
system integration
programs stands at
$351.2 million in total
public / private research
investment since 2010.
A table of the most
recent partnerships is
found in the attachment
to this question. US
Department of Energy
(DOE) Better Plants
Program partner.
Page 182 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Compliance with
regulatory
requirements/standards
Internal finance
mechanisms
Row 8
In the UK, meeting the
requirements of the
Carbon Reduction
Commitment (CRC)
Energy Efficiency
Scheme.
Row 9
In addition to the
dedicated capital fund,
energy and GHG
reduction projects are
also implemented
through normal
channels. Sites
implement energy
efficiency projects and
select energy efficient
options for projects by
using the same financial
tools and investment
criteria as are used for
the dedicated capital
fund.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C4.3.
Page 183 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C4.3d) Why did you not have any emissions
reduction initiatives active during the reporting
year? ≤ 5000
(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods
and/or services as low-carbon products or do
they enable a third party to avoid GHG emissions?
Yes
Row 1
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year
0.00
0 - 100
C4.3c
C4.3d
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to C4.3.
C4.3d
C4.5
C4.5
C4.5a
(C4.5a) Provide details of your products and/or services that you classify as low-carbon products or that enable a third party to avoid GHG emissions.
Product
1) Electric Truck AEOS: Cummins unveiled a revolutionary new all-electric powertrain in a demonstrator
truck in August 2017. The demonstrator truck uses a 140 KWh battery pack instead of a 12-liter engine. The
weight of the electric powertrain is roughly equal to that of the removed engine, aftertreatment,
transmission and fuel tank. The tractor day cab when paired with a trailer has a gross vehicle weight rating
limit of 75,000 pounds. The concept truck has a range of about 100 miles on a single charge for city driving
that’s extendable to 300 miles with additional battery packs. Cummins also acquired the assets of Brammo,
Inc., which designs and develops battery packs for mobile and stationary applications. Adding Brammo's
battery pack expertise and resources is an important milestone in Cummins' efforts to become a global
electrified power leader. In 2018 Cummins launched the new Electric Power Business Unit which will provide
fully electric and hybrid powertrain solutions along with innovative components and subsystems to serve all
our markets as they adopt electrification, meeting the needs of OEM partners and end customers.
Low-carbon product and avoided emissions
Other, please specify
Company's own fuel consumption model
Page 184 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year
40.00
0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 3
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
Cummins is currently developing the Cummins Electric Power Battery and the Cummins Hybrid Plug-In
systems for urban bus, which are expected to launch in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Cummins also design
and manufacture battery modules, packs and systems for commercial, industrial and material handling
applications using a
range of cell chemistries which are suitable for pure electric, hybrid and plug-in hybrid applications. In
addition to electrified powertrains for urban bus, Cummins intends to deliver product offerings to future
markets, including pick-up and delivery applications and other markets as they adopt electric solutions.
Cummins is actively investing in and utilizing the internal research and development capabilities, along with
strategic acquisitions and partnerships to meet objectives.
Group of products
Cummins introduced more than two-dozen new products or product updates in 2016, a natural outgrowth
of the company’s emphasis on innovation. Many involved helping customers meet their own environmental
goals, either through reducing emissions or achieving greater fuel efficiency. For the engine business,
products classified as low carbon products or that enable a third party to avoid GHG emissions are our wide
range of new fuel efficient engines, natural gas engines and engines that run on renewable fuels.
Low-carbon product and avoided emissions
Other, please specify
Company's own fuel consumption model
More than 40% but less than or equal to 60%
Group of products
For the power generation business, natural gas generator sets, distributed generation, combined heat and
power, micro-grids.
Low-carbon product and avoided emissions
Other, please specify
Company's own fuel consumption model
Page 185 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year
5.00
0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 4
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year
5.00
0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Level of aggregation
Less than or equal to 10%
Group of products
For the turbocharger and emissions solutions businesses, Single Module aftertreatment system for midrange
off-highway engines offer up to a 30 percent reduction in weight and up to a 50 percent reduction in size. In
2016, Cummins Turbo Technologies introduced its HE250WG turbocharger for off-highway engines,
designed to improve fuel economy by up to 2 percent
Avoided emissions
Other, please specify
Company's own fuel consumption model
Less than or equal to 10%
Page 186 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
Page 187 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Level of aggregation
Page 188 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
Page 189 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Level of aggregation
Description of product/Group of products (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they
enable avoided emissions?
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to
classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate
avoided emissions
% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the
reporting year 0 - 100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C4.5.
C4.5a
Page 190 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope 1
Base year start 01/01/2010
Base year end 31/12/2010
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e) 249,097.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start 01/01/2010
Base year end 31/12/2010
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e) 547,158.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start 01/01/2010
Base year end 31/12/2010
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e) 547,158.00 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
(C5.2) Select the name of the standard, protocol,
or methodology you have used to collect activity
data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2
emissions.
No
No
No
C5. Emissions methodology
A meaningful and consistent comparison of emissions over time is an essential step in environmental reporting. This module allows companies to provide the base year and base year emissions and
provide details of the standard, protocol, or methodology used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.C5.1
(C5.1) Provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2).
Scope 1 emissions include (1) Stationary combustion, (2) Generation of sold electricity, (3) Fugitive SF6,
CO2, (4) Mobile sources and (5) Refrigerant emissions
Scope 2 emissions include (1) Electricity, (2) Hot Water, (3) Steam
Scope 2 emissions include (1) Electricity, (2) Hot Water, (3) Steam
C5.1
C5.2
ABI Energia Linee Guida
Act on the Rational Use of Energy
American Petroleum Institute Compendium of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil
and Natural Gas Industry, 2009
Page 191 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Australia - National Greenhouse and Energy
Reporting Act
Bilan Carbone
Brazil GHG Protocol Programme
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers,
Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 2003
China Corporate Energy Conservation and GHG
Management Programme
Defra Voluntary 2017 Reporting Guidelines
ENCORD: Construction CO2e Measurement Protocol
Energy Information Administration 1605B
Environment Canada, Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)
Emission Estimation and Reporting Protocol for
Electric Utilities
Environment Canada, Aluminum Production,
Guidance Manual for Estimating Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Environment Canada, Base Metals Smelting/Refining,
Guidance Manual for Estimating Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Environment Canada, Cement Production, Guidance
Manual for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environment Canada, Primary Iron and Steel
Production, Guidance Manual for Estimating
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environment Canada, Lime Production, Guidance
Manual for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environment Canada, Primary Magnesium Production
and Casting, Guidance Manual for Estimating
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environment Canada, Metal Mining, Guidance
Manual for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emission
EPRA (European Public Real Estate Association)
guidelines, 2011
European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS):
The Monitoring and Reporting Regulation (MMR) –
General guidance for installations
Page 192 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS):
The Monitoring and Reporting Regulation (MMR) –
General guidance for aircraft operators
Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department,
Guidelines to Account for and Report on Greenhouse
Gas Emissions and Removals for Buildings, 2010
ICLEI Local Government GHG Protocol
India GHG Inventory Programme
International Wine Industry Greenhouse Gas Protocol
and Accounting Tool
IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories, 2006
IPIECA's Petroleum Industry Guidelines for reporting
GHG emissions, 2003
IPIECA’s Petroleum Industry Guidelines for reporting
GHG emissions, 2nd edition, 2011
ISO 14064-1
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning
the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on
Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures
(2005 Amendment)
Korea GHG and Energy Target Management System
Operating Guidelines
New Zealand - Guidance for Voluntary, Corporate
Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Philippine Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Reporting
Programme (PhilGARP)
Programa GEI Mexico
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Model
Rule
Smart Freight Centre: GLEC Framework for Logistics
Emissions Methodologies
Taiwan - GHG Reduction Act
Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization:
The National Guideline Carbon Footprint for
organization
The Climate Registry: Electric Power Sector (EPS)
Protocol
The Climate Registry: General Reporting Protocol
Page 193 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
The Climate Registry: Local Government Operations
(LGO) Protocol
The Climate Registry: Oil & Gas Protocol
The Cool Farm Tool
The GHG Indicator: UNEP Guidelines for Calculating
Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Businesses and Non-
Commercial Organizations
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate
Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Agricultural Guidance:
Interpreting the Corporate Accounting and Reporting
Standard for the Agricultural Sector
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Public Sector Standard
The Tokyo Cap-and Trade Program
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct Emissions from Iron
and Steel Production
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct Emissions from
Municipal Solid Waste Landfilling
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct HFC and PFC
Emissions from Manufacturing Refrigeration and Air
Conditioning Equipment
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct HFC and PFC
Emissions from Use of Refrigeration and Air
Conditioning Equipment
US EPA Climate Leaders: Indirect Emissions from
Purchases/ Sales of Electricity and Steam
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct Emissions from
Stationary Combustion
US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct Emissions from
Mobile Combustion Sources
C5.2a
US EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule
WBCSD: The Cement CO2 and Energy Protocol
World Steel Association CO2 emissions data
collection guidelines
Other, please specify
C5.2
Page 194 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C5.2a) Provide details of the standard, protocol,
or methodology you have used to collect activity
data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2
emissions. ≤ 5000
This question only appears if you select “Other, please specify” in response to C5.2.
C5.2a
Page 195 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
304,806.00
0 - 999999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons
CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 3
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons
CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 4
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons
CO2e) 0 - 999999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 1
Scope 2, location-based
C6. Emissions data
Reporting emissions is best practice and a pre-requisite to understanding and reducing negative environmental impacts.
This module examines emissions data details and is aligned with TCFD Metrics & Targets recommended disclosure b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, and the related risks.C6.1
(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Scope 1 emissions include (1) Stationary combustion, (2) Generation of sold electricity, (3) Fugitive SF6, CO2,
(4) Mobile sources and (5) Refrigerant emissions
C6.1
C6.2
(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Page 196 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope 2, market-based
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 1
Scope 2, location-based 540,666.00 0 - 99999999999
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable) 537,451.00 0 - 99999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Scope 2, location-based 0 - 99999999999
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable) 0 - 99999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 3
Scope 2, location-based 0 - 99999999999
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable) 0 - 99999999999
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Cummins reports both Scope 2 location based and market based figures
C6.2
C6.3
(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
The following sources where used to calculate location based emissions. 1) US EPA eGRID 2016, February 15,
2018 2) International Sources (Unless mentioned separately) Year 2014 factors from "CO2 Emissions from
Fuel Combustion (2016 Edition)", IEA, Paris. 3) CH4/N2O: International Electricity Emission Factors by
Country, 1999-2002.xls. International Energy Agency, as cited by EIA for 1605b.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/emission_factors.html 4) Australia: Latest estimated scope 2 emission
factors for consumption of purchased electricity from the grid; Source: National Greenhouse Gas Accounts
(NGA) Factors, August, 2016. 5) Brazil: Year 2014 factors from the Ministry of Science, Technology, and
Innovation. "Fatores de emissão de CO2 do Sistema Interligado Nacional do Brazil" 6) Canada: "National
Inventory Report 1990-2013", Annex 11. Year 2013 factors. 2015 Release 7) India: CO2 factors from India
Central Electricity Authority: CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector, Version 11.0, April 2016 8)
UK: 2016 Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: Methodology Paper for Emission
Factors. Year 2014 Factors. October 2016 Release
For Market based calculations, Cummins used residual mix factors for European facilities. Source: European
Residual Mixes 2016; Association of Issuing Bodies; Version 1.2, 15th June 2017. As residual mix factors are
not currently available for facilities outside of Europe, defaulted to location based emissions for purchased
electricity.
Page 197 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 4
Scope 2, location-based 0 - 99999999999
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable) 0 - 99999999999
End-year of reporting period 1900 - 2100
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities,
specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of
Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions that are within
your selected reporting boundary which are not
included in your disclosure?
No
New Row 1
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
C6.3
C6.4
C6.4
C6.4a
(C6.4a) Provide details of the sources of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions that are within your selected reporting boundary which are not included in your disclosure.
Page 198 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Page 199 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 200 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions
from this source (if applicable)
Explain why the source is excluded (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 3,728,000.00 0 - 999999999999
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C6.4.
C6.4a
C6.5
(C6.5) Account for your organization’s Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.
Relevant, calculated
Page 201 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 408,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 166,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Cummins total spend data for direct purchasing (including raw materials - metals and commodities usage) as
well as total 2017 indirect purchase expenses (including IT, supply chain services, real estate, engineering,
corporate services, etc.) were used to estimate the associated Scope 3 emissions. For purchased raw
materials, cradle to gate approach was used to estimate the scope 3 emissions using the 2011 purchase data
and was calculated for 2017 based on revenue change factor. For indirect purchasing goods and services,
UK DEFRA’s SIC Codes closest to the spend category and 2009 emission factors were utilized to estimate the
scope 3 emissions (Reference/Source of Emission factors: Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Including
mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting guidance; June 2013; pb13944-env-reporting-guidance.pdf;
defra.uk). We assume that 20% of the commodities used are MRO/Chemicals that is part of the indirect
purchasing. Also we assume 50 percent of the IT and engineering purchases come under this category and
rest in the capital goods category. We assume that the CMI spend on Corporate services is comprised of the
following SIC categories: Insurance and pension funds - 10 percent; Auxiliary financial services - 10 percent;
and Legal, consultancy, other business activities - 80 percent.
Used 2017 indirect purchase data and also emissions estimated during Cummins environmental hot spot
analysis study conducted in 2012 based on 2011 data adjusted to 2017 revenue. The hot spot analysis also
includes the direct purchases of metals and other raw materials that go into the manufacturing of engines.
Relevant, calculated
Cummins total 2017 spend data for capital goods purchases in facilities & construction, IT, engineering
and machinery was used to estimate the scope 3 emissions. UK DEFRA’s SIC Codes closest to the spend
category and 2009 emission factors were utilized to estimate the scope 3 emissions (Reference/Source of
Emission factors: Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Including mandatory greenhouse gas emissions
reporting guidance; June 2013; pb13944-env-reporting-guidance.pdf; defra.uk). We assume that 100
percent of the indirect purchasing on facilities and construction is towards capital goods purchases.
Used 2017 indirect spend data to update the calculations as described in the calculation methodology
Relevant, calculated
Page 202 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 735,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Waste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 7,200.00 0 - 999999999999
The activity data used to quantify these activities emissions are the quantity of energy consumed for each
energy type, such as electricity or natural gas. Consumption by fuel type is then multiplied by emission
factors for each of the activities included in this category. Emission factors for upstream emissions of
purchased fuels are based on life-cycle analysis software. Emission factors for upstream emissions of
purchased electricity are based on life-cycle analysis software for the US, and on UK Defra 2012 Guidelines
for other countries. Emission factors for T&D losses are based on EPA’s eGRID database for the US, and
on and on UK Defra 2012 Guidelines for other countries. GWPs are IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR -
100 year).
Includes scope 3 emissions from fuel and energy related activities from owned and operated facilities, 50:50
joint ventures subscribed to Cummins Enterprise Environmental Management System and 50:50
manufacturing joint venture where Cummins has significant influence on operations.
Relevant, calculated
The 2017 spend data for transportation and distribution was assumed to be equal to 80 percent of the
expenses on supply chain services. Also it was assumed 70 percent of the logistics was through road, 10
percent through rail, 10 percent through water and 10 percent through air. UK DEFRA’s SIC Codes for Rail,
Road, Water and Air categories and 2009 emission factors were utilized to estimate the scope 3 emissions
(Reference/Source of Emission factors: Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Including mandatory
greenhouse gas emissions reporting guidance; June 2013; pb13944-env-reporting-guidance.pdf; defra.uk).
Used 2017 indirect spend data for Supply Chain Services - Transportation and Distribution - to calculated the
upstream transportation and distribution emissions as described in the methodology.
Relevant, calculated
Page 203 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Business travel
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 38,500.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 117,000.00 0 - 999999999999
The Waste Reduction Model (WARM) created by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was used
to quantify the scope 3 emissions for the landfilled waste, combusted waste and composted waste from
Cummins global facilities for the year 2017. As there were no separate categories available for incinerated
waste and waste that was burned for energy recovery, both were included in the combusted waste category
and default factors in the tool were used to calculate the GHG emissions. Due to non-availability of exact
categories, the general refuse / garbage generated was categorized as Mixed Organics as it includes
primarily food waste from canteen, grass clippings from lawn etc. and the process derived industrial waste
was categorized as Mixed MSW. Composted waste data from global facilities and the same was included in
the emissions analysis (Reference/Source: EPA WARM Model).
In 2017, Cummins recycled about 89.0 percent of the global waste generated. This includes metals,
electronic items, paper, plastics and corrugated boxes. As the model shows a GHG reduction for recycled
product categories, the same was not included in the WARM model.
Relevant, calculated
All air travel data are tracked through a service provided to Cummins by AmEx. Emissions are calculated
using US EPA EF Hub November 2015 v2 Table 8, as per short, medium, and long haul air travel categories
and the associated emission factors.
Car rental mileage is provided by rental car companies (Hertz and Enterprise). The total emissions are
calculated using US EPA EF Hub Passenger Car factors. Used 2017 FY mileage data from Enterprise. For Hertz
used the 2016 FY data and adjusted based on the 2016-17 YoY increase in airtravel"
Provided to Cummins by American Express, the air travel services provider and Hertz, car rental provider.
This data is emissions from air travel for above 11,500 flights and car rentals Worldwide.
Relevant, calculated
Page 204 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
75.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 6,500.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
90.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 0.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0.00
0 - 100
Calculations derived from general country (outside of US) direct data and assumptions plus per state
employee headcount data. Some direct and some derived assumptions of commuter mileage and mode of
transportation. (Source of Emission factors: US EPA (2008); Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Core Module
Guidance - Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources, EPA Climate Leaders, Tables A-6 and A-7).
Cummins employees outside of the US tend be use transportation modes other than single-passenger
personal vehicles more than their US counterparts. While it results in fewer GHG emissions, it is harder to
track. This data represents the estimates conducted in 2012 by the regional environmental leaders and
adjusted for 2017 employee headcount.
Relevant, calculated
Cummins leased facilities exempt from environmental reporting that are shared facilities with no separate
meter and utility bills is considered under this category. Based on the Area Business Organization (ABO),
Business Unit (BU) and facility type (Eg: Office, Warehouse etc), scope 1 and scope 2 emissions intensity
were estimated and applied based on the occupied square footage. The total square footage is assumed to
the same as 2012. The Scope 1 and Scope 2 intensity is based on the average country specific intensities that
CMI owned/managed facilities emitted.
The list of facilities that are included in this category is maintained by the facilities real estate and the utility
charges are included in the lease amount. We applied the country specific intensity factor for scope 1 and
scope 2 and multiplied by the area of the leased facility in each country to get the totals.
Relevant, not yet calculated
Most Cummins customers pay for the transportation of products sold to them, either directly or via part of
an overall invoice. We do not have a tracking mechanism yet in place to determine what the emissions of
that transportation are at this time.
Page 205 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 2,700.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 1,000,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Most Cummins customers pay for the transportation of products sold to them, either directly or via part of
an overall invoice. We do not have a tracking mechanism yet in place to determine what the emissions of
that transportation are at this time.
Relevant, calculated
Engine weights used in the general categories of mid-range, heavy-duty and high-horsepower were derived
by updating the 2012 calculation of weighted-average by volume of the various engine families within those
three categories. Custodial engine volumes were taken from annual report Form 10-K and JV engine volumes
were assumed to be same as 2015. Assumptions were made on the power of the power tools / hoist used
and the time taken to install each unit.
Based on engines shipped as detailed in Cummins 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and JV actual volumes
from 2015.
Relevant, calculated
Cummins use of sold product emissions were calculated using overall volumes by segment and engine
model, which were then multiplied by the attrition rates to determine the volumes in operation each year
moving forward. 2017 emissions were calculated by adjusting overall 2017 engine volumes against 2015
volumes. We used the long-standing Cummins New and Recon parts proprietary parts consumption model
as well as customer engineering analysis to determine the attrition rate. We then multiplied each of these
yearly figures by an age factor (i.e., a 10 year old truck will not operate the same number of hours or miles as
a brand new truck) and then converted miles per gallon or gallons per hour to million metrics tons of CO2.
The CO2e conversion factor for Diesel was applied based on the EPA’s EF Hub and AR 4.
Page 206 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 57,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Downstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 46,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
The lifetime CO2 emissions of 1.3 million engines sold by Cummins and its joint ventures in 2017. Overall
volume of engines for custodial plants was down in 2017, the associated GHG emissions went down due to
product mix:
• Sharp drop in engines for off-highway (construction & agriculture), HHP (mining, O&G, rail,
military, etc.) & PowerGen more than off-set the increase in on-highway
• MMT of CO2 was up 32 for on-hwy, down 32 for off-hwy, down 36 for HHP and down 70 for PowerGen
Relevant, calculated
Cummins conducted a hot spot analysis to evaluate the impact of the end of life treatment of sold products.
The waste related to sold product is primarily iron and steel (more than 90%). The estimates are based on
landfilling, processing, and recycling of the generated wastes associated with those products. The
assumption is 5% of the products are scrapped – 90% is melted / processed.. The emissions were adjusted
based on the change in the number of engine units shipped between 2011 and 2017
The emissions reported here are the estimated emissions from the scrap of all products in use in the year
2011. This is different from the forward looking end of life emissions from all products sold in the year 2017.
Heavy-duty truck engine sales decreased $673 million primarily due to lower demand in the North American
heavyduty truck market with decreased engine shipments of 38 percent. Medium-duty truck and bus sales
decreased $235 million primarily due to lower demand in most global medium-duty truck markets with
decreased engine shipments of 17 percent, primarily in North America, Brazil and Mexico. Off-highway sales
decreased $64 million primarily due to decreased engine shipments in several North American industrial
markets, partially offset by increased unit shipments of 25 percent in international construction markets.
Relevant, calculated
This represents our rental generator fleet. We have made assumptions on generator use - as some
generators are used as backup power and others operate full time. The total number of rental fleet
generators at North American distributor locations were collected for 2012. Total fuel usage was estimated
based on the number of generators from each kW category, efficiency and monthly average run time. The
emissions were adjusted to the change in power solutions business.
Page 207 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Franchises
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 0.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Investments
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 0.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other (upstream)
This calculation is from 1340 units rented through our North American distributors during 2012 and doesn't
include similar fleets outside NA. The total emissions were adjusted proportionate to the drop in power
solutions business in 2015 compared to 2012. In 2017, since there was no separate power solutions sales
was available, used the power systems business as proxy. Power systems business saw a 15 percent increase
in business in 2017 and assumed this was reflected in power solutions too.
Not relevant, explanation provided
This is not applicable for Cummins as Cummins business model doesn't have franchises.
Cummins does not have any franchises.
Relevant, not yet calculated
Until 2012, Cummins had reported emissions from 50:50 unconsolidated manufacturing joint ventures as
emissions from investments. This is now included in Scope 1 and 2 after a change in boundary. However,
Cummins understands that emissions from investments can be expanded to minority / unconsolidated joint
venture operations where Cummins doesn't have operational or administrative control. Cummins hold
minority stake (<20% and 20-50% equity investee) in several distributor businesses and manufacturing
operations especially in North America and Asia. This is not tracked currently.
Cummins understands that emissions from investments can be expanded to minority / unconsolidated joint
venture operations where Cummins doesn't have operational or administrative control. Cummins hold
minority stake (<20% and 20-50% equity investee) in several distributor businesses and manufacturing
operations especially in North America and Asia. This is not tracked currently.
Page 208 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 0.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0.00
0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other (downstream)
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e 0.00 0 - 999999999999
Emissions calculation methodology (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Percentage of emissions calculated using data
obtained from suppliers or value chain partners 0 - 100
Explanation (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from
biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your
organization?
Yes
(C6.7a) Provide the emissions from biologically
sequestered carbon relevant to your organization
in metric tons CO2.
1,526.00
0 - 99999999999
Row 1
Intensity figure 42.9000000000 0 - 999999999999
Not evaluated
Cummins has not evaluated other upstream scope 3 emissions.
Cummins has not evaluated other upstream scope 3 emissions.
Not evaluated
Cummins has not evaluated other upstream scope 3 emissions.
Cummins has not evaluated other upstream scope 3 emissions.
C6.5
C6.7
C6.7
C6.7a
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C6.7.
C6.7a
C6.10
(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit currency total revenue and provide any additional
intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Page 209 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions)
845,472.00
0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 19710.1 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used Location-based
% change from previous year 13.70 0 - 999
Direction of change Decreased
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
unit total revenue
The revenue (inflation adjusted to 2010$) increased by 16.7% when the emissions increased only by 0.7%.
This resulted in a net decrease in the revenue based gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
Page 210 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Page 211 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
Page 212 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Intensity figure 0 - 999999999999
Page 213 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope
1 and 2 emissions) 0 - 999999999999
Metric denominator
Metric denominator: Unit total 0 - 10000000000000
Scope 2 figure used
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Reason for change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
C6.10
Page 214 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C7.1) Does your organization have greenhouse
gas emissions other than carbon dioxide?
Yes
Greenhouse gas
Scope 1 emissions
(metric tons of CO2e) GWP Reference
CO2 288,377.00 IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report (AR4 - 100 year)
0 - 999999999999
CH4 201.00 IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report (AR4 - 100 year)
0 - 999999999999
N2O 504.00 IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report (AR4 - 100 year)
0 - 999999999999
HFCs 15,697.00 Other, please specify
Methodology based on
Facility Sq Footage
0 - 999999999999
C7. Emissions breakdowns
This module enables respondents to break down Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by country, business division, facility and sector.
By breaking down emissions by country or regional level, information and data can be made available to regions, states and sub-national bodies to help guide the development of emissions-related
legislation.
Breaking down emissions by business division, facility, and activity grants data users and investors transparency into the sources of a company's Scope 1 and 2 emissions and allows tracking the
performance of divisions and individual facilities over time.C7.1
C7.1
C7.1a
(C7.1a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type and provide the source of each used greenhouse warming potential (GWP).
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
Page 215 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Other, please specify
Fugitive SF6, CO2
27.00 IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report (AR4 - 100 year)
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
Row 5
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
Page 216 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
Page 217 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 25
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C7.1.
C7.1a
New Row 23
New Row 24
Page 218 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Country/Region
Scope 1 emissions
(metric tons CO2e)
United States of America 176,759.00
0 - 999999999999
Australia 4,763.00
0 - 999999999999
Brazil 4,334.00
0 - 999999999999
China 34,970.00
0 - 999999999999
India 16,326.00
0 - 999999999999
Mexico 5,614.00
0 - 999999999999
South Africa 1,715.00
0 - 999999999999
United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern
Ireland
26,441.00
0 - 999999999999
C7.2
(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/region.
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
Row 5
Row 6
Row 7
Row 8
Page 219 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Other, please specify Rest of World 33,885.00
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
Row 9
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
Page 220 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
Page 221 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
New Row 26
New Row 27
New Row 28
New Row 29
New Row 30
Page 222 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 31
New Row 32
New Row 33
New Row 34
New Row 35
New Row 36
New Row 37
New Row 38
New Row 39
New Row 40
New Row 41
Page 223 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 42
New Row 43
New Row 44
New Row 45
New Row 46
New Row 47
New Row 48
New Row 49
New Row 50
New Row 51
Page 224 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 52
New Row 53
New Row 54
New Row 55
New Row 56
New Row 57
New Row 58
New Row 59
New Row 60
New Row 61
Page 225 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 62
New Row 63
New Row 64
New Row 65
New Row 66
New Row 67
New Row 68
New Row 69
New Row 70
New Row 71
New Row 72
Page 226 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1
emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
Yes
No
No
Business division (≤ 500)
Scope 1 emissions
(metric ton CO2e)
111,328.00
0 - 999999999999
93,315.00
0 - 999999999999
New Row 73
New Row 74
New Row 75
C7.2
C7.3
By business division
By facility
By activity
C7.3
C7.3a
(C7.3a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division.
Row 1 Engine Business Unit
Row 2
Power Systems Business
Unit
Page 227 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
58,137.00
0 - 999999999999
23,448.00
0 - 999999999999
8,865.00
0 - 999999999999
9,713.00
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
Row 3
Distribution Business
Unit
Row 4
Components Business
Unit
Row 5
Supply Chain (New
& ReCon Parts and
Logistics)
Row 6 Shared Services
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
Page 228 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
Page 229 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 17
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
This question only appears if you select “By business division” in response to C7.3.
C7.3a
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
Page 230 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Facility (≤ 500)
Scope 1 emissions
(metric tons CO2e) Latitude Longitude
Enter a number from 0
to +/-90.000000 using a
maximum of 6 decimal
places.
Enter a number from 0
to +/-90.000000 using a
maximum of 6 decimal
places.
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
C7.3b
(C7.3b) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business facility.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
Page 231 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 9
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
Page 232 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
New Row 26
New Row 27
New Row 28
New Row 29
Page 233 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 30
New Row 31
New Row 32
New Row 33
New Row 34
New Row 35
New Row 36
New Row 37
New Row 38
New Row 39
Page 234 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 40
New Row 41
New Row 42
New Row 43
New Row 44
New Row 45
New Row 46
New Row 47
New Row 48
New Row 49
New Row 50
Page 235 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 51
New Row 52
New Row 53
New Row 54
New Row 55
New Row 56
New Row 57
New Row 58
New Row 59
New Row 60
Page 236 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 61
New Row 62
New Row 63
New Row 64
New Row 65
New Row 66
New Row 67
New Row 68
New Row 69
New Row 70
Page 237 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
0 - 999999999999 -90 - 90 -180 - 180
New Row 75
This question only appears if you select “By facility” in response to C7.3.
C7.3b
New Row 71
New Row 72
New Row 73
New Row 74
Page 238 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity (≤ 500)
Scope 1 emissions
(metric tons CO2e)
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
C7.3c
(C7.3c) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business activity.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
Page 239 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
Page 240 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
New Row 26
New Row 27
New Row 28
New Row 29
New Row 30
Page 241 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 31
New Row 32
New Row 33
New Row 34
New Row 35
New Row 36
New Row 37
New Row 38
New Row 39
New Row 40
Page 242 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
New Row 41
New Row 42
New Row 43
New Row 44
New Row 50
New Row 45
New Row 46
New Row 47
New Row 48
New Row 49
Page 243 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
This question only appears if you select “By activity” in response to C7.3.
C7.3c
Page 244 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Country/Region
Scope 2, location-based
(metric tons CO2e)
Scope 2, market-based
(metric tons CO2e)
Purchased and
consumed electricity,
heat, steam or cooling
(MWh)
Purchased and
consumed low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam
or cooling accounted in
market-based approach
(MWh)
United States of America 261,122.00 261,122.00 538,290.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Australia 7,168.00 7,168.00 8,234.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Brazil 3,153.00 3,153.00 23,207.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
China 114,817.00 114,817.00 171,758.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
India 85,133.00 85,133.00 103,645.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Mexico 24,375.00 24,375.00 53,201.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
South Africa 3,322.00 3,322.00 3,275.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern
Ireland
24,936.00 20,221.00 51,778.00 0.00
C7.5
(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/region.
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
Row 5
Row 6
Row 7
Row 8
Page 245 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Other, please specify Rest of World 16,640.00 18,140.00 47,360.00 0.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
Row 9
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
Page 246 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
New Row 26
Page 247 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
New Row 27
New Row 28
New Row 29
New Row 30
New Row 31
New Row 32
New Row 33
New Row 34
New Row 35
New Row 36
New Row 37
New Row 38
New Row 39
Page 248 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
New Row 40
New Row 41
New Row 42
New Row 43
New Row 44
New Row 45
New Row 46
New Row 47
New Row 48
New Row 49
New Row 50
New Row 51
New Row 52
New Row 53
Page 249 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
New Row 54
New Row 55
New Row 56
New Row 57
New Row 58
New Row 59
New Row 60
New Row 61
New Row 62
New Row 63
New Row 64
New Row 65
New Row 66
Page 250 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999 0 - 999999999999 0 - 999999999999
(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2
emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
Yes
No
No
Business division (≤ 500)
Scope 2, location-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
Scope 2, market-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
New Row 67
New Row 68
New Row 69
New Row 70
New Row 71
New Row 72
New Row 73
New Row 74
New Row 75
C7.5
C7.6
By business division
By facility
By activity
C7.6
C7.6a
(C7.6a) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division.
Page 251 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
249,752.00 249,003.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
79,792.00 77,972.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
41,543.00 41,662.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
115,784.00 115,241.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
30,746.00 30,641.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
23,048.00 22,932.00
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
Row 1 Engine Business Unit
Row 2
Power Systems Business
Unit
Row 3
Distribution Business
Unit
Row 4
Components Business
Unit
Row 5
Supply Chain (New
& ReCon Parts and
Logistics)
Row 6 Shared Services
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
Page 252 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
Page 253 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
This question only appears if you select “Business division” in response to C7.6.
C7.6a
New Row 21
New Row 22
Page 254 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Facility (≤ 500)
Scope 2 location-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
Scope 2, market-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
C7.6b
(C7.6b) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business facility.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
Page 255 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
Page 256 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
New Row 26
New Row 27
New Row 28
New Row 29
New Row 30
Page 257 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 31
New Row 32
New Row 33
New Row 34
New Row 35
New Row 36
New Row 37
New Row 38
New Row 39
New Row 40
Page 258 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 41
New Row 42
New Row 43
New Row 44
New Row 45
New Row 46
New Row 47
New Row 48
New Row 49
New Row 50
Page 259 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 51
New Row 52
New Row 53
New Row 54
New Row 55
New Row 56
New Row 57
New Row 58
New Row 59
New Row 60
New Row 61
Page 260 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 62
New Row 63
New Row 64
New Row 65
New Row 66
New Row 67
New Row 68
New Row 69
New Row 70
New Row 71
Page 261 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
Activity (≤ 500)
Scope 2, location-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
Scope 2, market-based
emissions (metric tons
CO2e)
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 72
New Row 73
New Row 74
New Row 75
This question only appears if you select “By facility” in response to C7.6.
C7.6b
C7.6c
(C7.6c) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business activity.
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
Page 262 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
0 - 99999999999 0 - 99999999999
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “By activity” in response to C7.6.
C7.6c
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
Page 263 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope
1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year
compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Change in emissions
(metric tons CO2e) Direction of change
Emissions value
(percentage)
Please explain
calculation (≤ 2400)
76.00 Decreased 0.01
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
23,918.00 Decreased 2.85
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
C-CH7.8
C7.9
Remained the same overall
C7.9
C7.9a
(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) and for each of them specify how your emissions compare to the previous
year.
Change in renewable energy consumption
On-site Electricity
Generation from
renewable sources (Eg:
on-site solar panels)
where Cummins
retained the RECs
increased from 268
MWh in 2016 to 407
MWh in 2017.
Other emissions reduction activities
Emissions reduction
activities. In 2017,
Cummins implemented
94 projects that
accounted for net
reduction of 23,918
metric tons of CO2e
Page 264 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
29,877.00 Increased 3.56
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
Divestment
No divestment that
significantly impacted
emissions
Acquisitions
No acquisitions that
contributed to the
emissions
Mergers
No mergers that
contributed to the
emissions
Change in output
Increased production
and activities resulted in
a net increase in
combined absolute
emissions by 0.7%
Change in methodology
No change in
methodology
Change in boundary
No change in boundary
Change in physical operating conditions
No change in physical
operating conditions
Page 265 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
0.00 No change 0.00
0 - 999999999999 0 - 999
(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance
calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-
based Scope 2 emissions figure or a market-based
Scope 2 emissions figure?
Location-based
Unidentified
No unidentified changes
Other
No changes other that
what is listed above
This question only appears if you select “Increased”, “Decreased” or “Remained the same overall” in response to C7.9.
C7.9a
C7.9b
This question only appears if you select “Increased”, “Decreased” or “Remained the same overall” in response to C7.9.
C7.9b
Page 266 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational
spend in the reporting year was on energy?
Indicate whether your
organization undertakes
this energy-related
activity
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Heating value
MWh from renewable
sources
MWh from non-
renewable sources Total MWh
HHV (higher heating
value)
0.00 1,321,112.00 1,321,112.00
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
C8. Energy
Energy related activities represent, for many sectors, the most significant GHG emission sources. This module provides transparency on the consumption and generation of energy by organizations to
enable greater insight into this emissions source.
Accurate emissions accounting depends on a comprehensive account of energy. It is expected that organizations have already collected the necessary energy data for the disclosure of emissions in C8.1
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%
C8.1
C8.2
(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity
Consumption of purchased or acquired heat
Consumption of purchased or acquired steam
Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling
Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling
The energy-relatedactivities that you select in response to C8.2 determine which energy breakdowns you will be prompted to respond to in the proceeding
questions. Please note, if your response to C8.2 is amended, data in dependent questions may be erased.
C8.2
C8.2a
(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)
Page 267 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
3,166.00 991,790.00 994,956.00
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
0.00 10,991.00 10,991.00
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
407.00 407.00
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
5,607.00 2,323,893.00 2,327,466.00
0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999 0 - 9999999999
Indicate whether your
organization undertakes
this fuel application
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity
Consumption of purchased or acquired heat
Consumption of purchased or acquired steam
Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling
Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable
energy
Total energy consumption
This question appears if you selected “Yes” to any of the activities listed in C8.2. A row will appear in this table for each energy-related activity selected in C8.2.
The “Total energy consumption” row will always appear.
C8.2a
C8.2b
(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity
Consumption of fuel for the generation of steam
Consumption of fuel for the generation of cooling
Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation
Page 268 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
521,989.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
85,788.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
1,869.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
1,869.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 2
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
580,742.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
28,019.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
333,271.00
0 - 9999999999
This question only appears if you select “Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)” in response to C8.2. Each option that you select in this table will appear
as an additional column in C8.2c.
C8.2b
C8.2c
(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.
Fuel Oil Number 2
HHV (higher heating
value)
Natural Gas
HHV (higher heating
value)
Page 269 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
104,222.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 3
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
11,696.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
302.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 4
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
707.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Propane Liquid
HHV (higher heating
value)
Other, please specify
Stationary Gasoline
HHV (higher heating
value)
Page 270 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 5
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
61,759.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 6
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
121,188.00
0 - 9999999999
Motor Gasoline
HHV (higher heating
value)
Diesel
HHV (higher heating
value)
Page 271 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
Row 7
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
23,030.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam
0.00
0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration
0.00
0 - 9999999999
New Row 1
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Jet Kerosene
HHV (higher heating
value)
Page 272 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 2
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 3
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Page 273 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 4
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
Page 274 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 5
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 6
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
Page 275 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 7
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 8
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
Page 276 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 9
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 10
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
Page 277 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 11
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 12
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
Page 278 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 13
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 14
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
Page 279 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 15
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 16
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Page 280 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 17
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 18
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Page 281 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 19
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
Page 282 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 20
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 21
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
Page 283 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 22
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 23
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
Page 284 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 24
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
New Row 25
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for the self-generation of
electricity 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat 0 - 9999999999
Page 285 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
steam 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of
cooling 0 - 9999999999
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or
self-trigeneration 0 - 9999999999
Acetylene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Agricultural Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Alternative Kiln Fuel (Wastes)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Animal Fat
Emission factor -99 - 999999
This question only appears if you select “Consumption of fuel” in C8.2 and a column appears in the table for each fuel application selected in C8.2b. The “Total
MWh consumed by the organization” and “MWh consumed for the generation of heat” columns will always appear.
C8.2c
C8.2d
(C8.2d) List the average emission factors of the fuels reported in C8.2c.
Page 286 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Animal/Bone Meal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Anthracite Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Asphalt
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Aviation Gasoline
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Bagasse
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 287 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Bamboo
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Basic Oxygen Furnace Gas (LD Gas)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biodiesel
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biodiesel Tallow
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biodiesel Waste Cooking Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 288 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Bioethanol
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biogas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biogasoline
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biomass Municipal Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Biomethane
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 289 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Bitumen
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Bituminous Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Black Liquor
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Blast Furnace Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Brown Coal Briquettes (BKB)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 290 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Burning Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Butane
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Butylene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Charcoal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 291 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Coal Tar
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Coke
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Coke Oven Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Coking Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 292 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Condensate
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Crude Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Crude Oil Extra Heavy
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Crude Oil Heavy
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Crude Oil Light
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Page 293 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Diesel
Emission factor 10.21000 -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Distillate Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Dried Sewage Sludge
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
kg CO2 per gallon
US EPA Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories Last Modified: 4 April 2014
Solid, gaseous, liquid and biomass fuels: Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule
, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2 at FR pp. 56409-56410. Revised emission factors for selected fuels:
Federal Register (2010) EPA; 40 CFR Part 98; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule,
17Dec10, 81 pp. W ith Amendments from Memo: Table of Final 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (PDF) to 40 CFR part 98, subpart C: Table C–1 to Subpart C—Default CO2 Emission Factors
and High Heat Values for Various Types of Fuel and Table C–2 to Subpart C—Default CH4 and N2O
Emission Factors for Various Types of Fuel.
The CH4 and N2O are calculated using Climate Leaders Mobile Sources Guidance, Table 3; Global warming
potential Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Fourth Assessment Report (AR4),
2007.
This is used for Scope 1 mobile source emissions and Scope 3 Use of Sold Products emission calculations.
Page 294 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Ethane
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Ethylene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Oil Number 1
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Oil Number 2
Emission factor 74.21000 -99 - 999999
Unit kg CO2e per million Btu
Page 295 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Oil Number 4
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Oil Number 5
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fuel Oil Number 6
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Gas Coke
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Solid, gaseous, liquid, and biomass fuels: Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2 at FR pp.
56409-56410. Revised emission factors for selected fuels: Federal Register (2010) EPA; 40 CFR Part 98;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule, 17Dec10, 81 pp. With Amendments from Memo:
Table of Final 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (PDF) to 40 CFR part 98, subparts C
and AA: Table C–1 to Subpart C—Default CO2 Emission Factors and High Heat Values for Various Types of
Fuel, Table C–2 to Subpart C—Default CH4 and N2O Emission Factors for Various Types of Fuel, and Table
AA–1 to Subpart AA of Part 98—Kraft Pulping Liquor Emissions Factors for Biomass-Based CO2, CH4, and
N2O.
This is used for Scope 1 Stationary Combustion emissions
Page 296 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Gas Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Gas Works Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
GCI Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
General Municipal Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Grass
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Page 297 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Hardwood
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Heavy Gas Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Hydrogen
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Industrial Wastes
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Isobutane
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Page 298 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Isobutylene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Jet Gasoline
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Jet Kerosene
Emission factor 9.75000 -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Kerosene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
kg CO2 per gallon
Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases;
Final Rule, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2. Climate Leaders Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Core
Module Guidance - Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources, Table B-5.
The CH4 and N2O are calculated using Climate Leaders Mobile Sources Guidance, Table 3; Global warming
potential Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Fourth Assessment Report (AR4),
2007.
This is used for calculating Scope 1 mobile source emissions.
Page 299 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Landfill Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Light Distillate
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Lignite Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 300 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Liquid Biofuel
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Lubricants
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Marine Fuel Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Marine Gas Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Metallurgical Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 301 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Methane
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Motor Gasoline
Emission factor 8.78000 -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Naphtha
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Natural Gas
Emission factor 53.11000 -99 - 999999
Unit
kg CO2 per gallon
Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases;
Final Rule, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2. Climate Leaders Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Core
Module Guidance - Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources, Table B-5.
The CH4 and N2O are calculated using Climate Leaders Mobile Sources Guidance, Table 3; Global warming
potential Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Fourth Assessment Report (AR4),
2007.
This is used for calculating Scope 1 mobile source emissions.
kg CO2e per million Btu
Page 302 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Natural Gas Liquids (NGL)
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Natural Gasoline
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Non-Biomass Municipal Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Non-Biomass Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Solid, gaseous, liquid and biomass fuels: Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule
, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2 at FR pp. 56409-56410. Revised emission factors for selected fuels:
Federal Register (2010) EPA; 40 CFR Part 98; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule,
17Dec10, 81 pp. W ith Amendments from Memo: Table of Final 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (PDF) to 40 CFR part 98, subpart C: Table C–1 to Subpart C—Default CO2 Emission Factors
and High Heat Values for Various Types of Fuel and Table C–2 to Subpart C—Default CH4 and N2O
Emission Factors for Various Types of Fuel.
This is used for Scope 1 Stationary Combustion emissions
Page 303 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Oil Sands
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Oil Shale
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Orimulsion
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other Petroleum Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Paraffin Waxes
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 304 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Patent Fuel
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
PCI Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Peat
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Pentanes Plus
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Petrochemical Feedstocks
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 305 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Petrol
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Petroleum Coke
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Petroleum Products
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Pitch
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Plastics
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 306 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Primary Solid Biomass
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Propane Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Propane Liquid
Emission factor 61.96000 -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Propylene
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
kg CO2e per million Btu
Solid, gaseous, liquid and biomass fuels: Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule
, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2 at FR pp. 56409-56410. Revised emission factors for selected fuels:
Federal Register (2010) EPA; 40 CFR Part 98; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule,
17Dec10, 81 pp. W ith Amendments from Memo: Table of Final 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (PDF) to 40 CFR part 98, subpart C: Table C–1 to Subpart C—Default CO2 Emission Factors
and High Heat Values for Various Types of Fuel and Table C–2 to Subpart C—Default CH4 and N2O
Emission Factors for Various Types of Fuel.
This is used for Scope 1 Stationary Combustion emissions and Mobile Emissions
Page 307 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Refinery Feedstocks
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Refinery Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Refinery Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Residual Fuel Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Road Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 308 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
SBP
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Shale Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Sludge Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Softwood
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Solid Biomass Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 309 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Special Naphtha
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Still Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Straw
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Subbituminous Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Sulphite Lyes
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 310 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Tar
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Tar Sands
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Thermal Coal
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Thermal Coal Commercial
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Thermal Coal Domestic
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 311 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Thermal Coal Industrial
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Tires
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Town Gas
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Unfinished Oils
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Vegetable Oil
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 312 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Waste Oils
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Waste Paper and Card
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Waste Plastics
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Waste Tires
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
White Spirit
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 313 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Wood
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Wood Chips
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Wood Logs
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Wood Pellets
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Wood Waste
Emission factor -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 314 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other
Emission factor 70.47000 -99 - 999999
Unit
Emission factor source (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Total Gross generation
(MWh)
Generation that is
consumed by the
organization (MWh)
Gross generation from
renewable sources
(MWh)
Generation from
renewable sources that
is consumed by the
organization (MWh)
118,087.00 85,788.00 5,607.00 5,607.00
0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999
335,443.00 335,443.00 0.00 0.00
0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999
1,869.00 1,869.00 0.00 0.00
0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999 0 - 999999999
kg CO2e per million Btu
Solid, gaseous, liquid and biomass fuels: Federal Register (2009) EPA; 40 CFR Parts 86, 87, 89 et al;
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule
, 30Oct09, 261 pp. Tables C-1 and C-2 at FR pp. 56409-56410. Revised emission factors for selected fuels:
Federal Register (2010) EPA; 40 CFR Part 98; Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule,
17Dec10, 81 pp. W ith Amendments from Memo: Table of Final 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas
Reporting Rule (PDF) to 40 CFR part 98, subpart C: Table C–1 to Subpart C—Default CO2 Emission Factors
and High Heat Values for Various Types of Fuel and Table C–2 to Subpart C—Default CH4 and N2O
Emission Factors for Various Types of Fuel.
This is used for Scope 1 Stationary Combustion emissions
This question only appears if you input data into C8.2c. A corresponding row will appear for each fuel that you reported in C8.2c.
C8.2d
C8.2e
(C8.2e) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and cooling your organization has generated and consumed in the reporting year.
Electricity
Heat
Steam
Cooling
Page 315 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
This question only appears if you select “Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling” in response to C8.2.
C8.2e
C8.2f
(C8.2f) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a low-carbon emission factor in the market-based Scope 2 figure
reported in C6.3.
No purchases or generation of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling accounted with a low-carbon emission factor
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
No low-carbon emission factor in the market-based Scope 2 figure reported in C6.3.
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Page 316 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Page 317 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Page 318 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Page 319 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 320 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 11
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 321 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 12
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 322 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 13
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 14
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 323 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 15
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 16
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 324 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 17
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 18
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Page 325 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 19
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 20
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Page 326 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 21
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 22
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Page 327 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 23
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 24
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Solar PV
Page 328 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 25
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Low-carbon technology type
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon
electricity, heat, steam or cooling 0 - 999999999999
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per
MWh) 0 - 99999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity”, “Consumption of purchased or acquired heat”, “Consumption of
purchased or acquired steam” or “Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling” in response to C8.2.
C8.2f
Solar PV
Concentrated solar power (CSP)
Wind
Hydropower
Nuclear
Biomass (including biogas)
Tidal
Other low-carbon technology, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 329 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
C-TS8.4
Page 330 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Description
Metric value 89.50 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0.60 0 - 999
Direction of change Increased
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Description
Metric value 0.08 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 1.50 0 - 999
Direction of change Decreased
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Description
C9. Additional metrics
CDP data users seek to understand in which areas, beyond GHG emissions, companies are trying to reduce their environmental impacts. This new module requests reporting organizations to present
relevant climate-related metrics that may indirectly or directly impact their emissions or energy use.
This module includes one general question on additional climate-related metrics and a number of sector-specific questions on metrics such as production outputs, low-carbon technology C9.1
(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.
Waste
Total Waste Recycled
Total Waste Generated
Cummins 2020 Sustainability Goal includes increasing recycling rate to 95%. In 2017 Cummins recycled
89.5% of the total waste generated at the global facilities and operations.
Energy use
Total Energy Used [MMBtu]
Total Hours Worked
Cummins 2020 Sustainability Goal includes reducing energy intensity [MMBtu/hours worked] by 32% from
2010 baseline. By 2017 Cummins reduced 25% energy intensity at their global facilities and operations.
Page 331 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Page 332 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Page 333 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Page 334 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 11
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Page 335 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 12
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 13
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 14
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Page 336 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 15
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 16
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 337 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 17
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 18
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 19
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
Page 338 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 20
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 21
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 22
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Page 339 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 23
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 24
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 340 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 25
Description
Metric value 0 - 99999999999
Metric numerator (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Metric denominator (intensity metric only) (≤
50) ≤ 50
% change from previous year 0 - 999
Direction of change
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
C9.1
Page 341 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Row 1
Activity
Investment start date 29/08/2017
Investment end date 31/12/2020
Investment area Products
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 500,000,000.00 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage 0-20%
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
C-TO9.3/C-TS9.3
C-TO9.6/C-TS9.6
(C-TO9.6/C-TS9.6) What is your investment in research and development (R&D), equipment, products and services and which part of it would you consider a direct
investment in the low-carbon transition?
Heavy Duty Vehicles
(HDV)
Other, please specify
Drivetrain, Electrictrification
Pilot demonstration
On August 29, 2017, Cummins unveiled a revolutionary new all electric powertrain in a demostrator truck.
The demonstrator truck uses a 140 KWh battery pack instead of a 12-liter engine. The weight of the
electric powertrain is roughly equal to that of the removed engine, aftertreatment, transmission and fuel
tank. The tractor day cab when paired with a trailer has a gross vehicle weight rating limit of 75,000
pounds. The concept truck has a range of about 100 miles on a single charge for city driving that’s
extendable to 300 miles with additional battery packs. The powertrain and truck will enable Cummins to
learn more about the potential electrification holds for larger vehicles.
$500 million is over a three year period.
Page 342 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Page 343 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Page 344 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Page 345 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Page 346 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 11
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 12
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Page 347 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 13
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 14
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 15
Page 348 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 16
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 17
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Page 349 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 18
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 19
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Page 350 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 20
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 21
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Page 351 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 22
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 23
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 24
Page 352 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 25
Activity
Investment start date
Investment end date
Investment area
Technology area
Investment maturity
Investment figure 0 - 999999999999
Low-carbon investment percentage
Please explain (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
C-TO9.6/C-TS9.6
Page 353 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verification/assurance
status
Third-party verification
or assurance process in
place
Third-party verification
or assurance process in
place
Third-party verification
or assurance process in
place
Row 1
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
C10. Verification
Verification and assurance is good practice in environmental reporting as it ensures the quality of data and processes disclosed.
This module requests details on the verification status that applies to organizations’ reported Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, as well as on the verification of other climate-related information reported in
the CDP disclosure.C10.1
(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)
Scope 3
C10.1
C10.1a
(C10.1a) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 1
Annual process
Complete
Limited assurance
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 1 Scope 1 Emissions
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc (BVNA) Verification Statement Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cummins Entity Wide GHG Emissions for 2017
Boundary: Operational Control, Worldwide
GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted: World Resources Institute
(WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol,
Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard;
GHG Verification Protocols: ISO 14064-3: Greenhouse gases -- Part 3
ISO14064-3
Page 354 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
0 - 100
Row 2
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
0 - 100
Row 3
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Scope 2 location-based
Annual process
Complete
Limited assurance
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 1 Scope 2 Emissions - Location Based
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc (BVNA) Verification Statement Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cummins Entity Wide GHG Emissions for 2017
Boundary: Operational Control, Worldwide
GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted: World Resources Institute
(WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol,
Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard;
GHG Verification Protocols: ISO 14064-3: GHG Part3
ISO14064-3
Scope 2 market-based
Annual process
Complete
Limited assurance
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 355 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
0 - 100
New Row 1
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 2
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Page 1 Scope 2 Emissions - Market Based
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc (BVNA) Verification Statement Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cummins Entity Wide GHG Emissions for 2017
Boundary: Operational Control, Worldwide
GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted: World Resources Institute
(WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol,
Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard;
GHG Verification Protocols: ISO 14064-3: GHG Part3
ISO14064-3
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 356 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 3
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 4
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 5
Scope
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 357 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 6
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 7
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 358 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 8
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 9
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 359 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 10
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 11
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 12
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 360 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 13
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 14
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 361 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 15
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 16
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 17
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 362 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 18
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 19
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 363 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 20
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 21
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 364 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 22
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 23
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 24
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 365 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
New Row 25
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Type of verification or assurance
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/ section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%) 0 - 100
Row 1
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This question only appears if you select “Third-party verification or assurance process in place” for Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions in response to C10.1.
C10.1a
C10.1b
(C10.1b) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 3 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 3- all relevant categories
Annual process
Complete
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 366 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 1
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 2
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 3
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Page 2 & 3 Scope 3 Emissions
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc (BVNA) Verification Statement Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cummins Entity Wide GHG Emissions for 2017
Boundary: Operational Control, Worldwide
GHG Reporting Protocols against which verification was conducted: WRI/WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting
Standard (Scope 3)
GHG Verification Protocols: ISO 14064-3: GHG Part3
ISO14064-3
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 367 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 4
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 5
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 6
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 368 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 7
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 8
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 9
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 369 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
New Row 10
Scope
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Status in the current reporting year
Attach the statement (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Page/section reference (≤ 500) ≤ 500
Relevant standard
(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related
information reported in your CDP disclosure
other than the emissions figures reported in
C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
Disclosure module
verification relates to Data verified
Verification standard (≤
1500) Please explain (≤ 1500)
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
This question only appears if you select “Third-party verification or assurance process in place” for Scope 3 emissions in response to C10.1
C10.1b
C10.2
Yes
C10.2
C10.2a
(C10.2a) Which data points within your CDP disclosure have been verified, and which verification standards were used?
Page 370 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
C9. Additional metrics Other, please specify
WsasteRow 1
Verification Protocols
used to conduct the
verification:
on Assurance
Engagements (ISAE)
3000 Revised,
Assurance Engagements
Other
than Audits or Reviews
of Historical Financial
Information (effective
for assurance reports
dated on or after
Dec. 15, 2015), issued
by the International
Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board.
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BVNA) was
engaged to conduct an independent
verification of the waste data
reported by Cummins, Inc. (Cummins) for the
calendar year 2017. This Verification Statement
applies to the related
information included within the scope of work
described below.
The determination of the waste quantities is
the sole responsibility of Cummins. BVNA’s
sole responsibility was to
provide independent verification on the
accuracy of the waste quantities reported, and
on the underlying systems and
processes used to collect, analyze and review
the information.
Boundaries of the reporting company waste
activities covered by the verification:
Operational Control, Worldwide
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C10.2.
C10.2a
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
Page 371 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities
regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS,
Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
(C11.1a) Select the carbon pricing regulation(s)
which impacts your operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
C11. Carbon pricing
Carbon pricing has emerged as a key policy mechanism to drive greenhouse gas emissions reductions and mitigate the dangerous impacts of climate change. As the number of jurisdictions with
carbon pricing policies has doubled over the last decade, CDP data users are interested in understanding how companies are affected by these schemes.
This module examines details on the operations or activities regulated by carbon pricing systems, carbon credits and internal prices on carbon.C11.1
Yes
C11.1
C11.1a
Alberta carbon tax
Alberta SGER
Australia ERF Safeguard Mechanism
BC carbon tax
BC GGIRCA
Beijing pilot ETS
California CaT
Chile carbon tax
China national ETS
Chongqing pilot ETS
Colombia carbon tax
Denmark carbon tax
Estonia carbon tax
EU ETS
Finland carbon tax
France carbon tax
Fujian pilot ETS
Guangdong pilot ETS
Hubei pilot ETS
Iceland carbon tax
Ireland carbon tax
Japan carbon tax
Kazakhstan ETS
Korea ETS
Latvia carbon tax
Liechtenstein carbon tax
Massachusetts state ETS
Mexico carbon tax
New Zealand ETS
Norway carbon tax
Page 372 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
YesUK CRC Energy
Efficiency Scheme (CRC)
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Alberta SGER
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Ontario CaT
Poland carbon tax
Portugal carbon tax
Québec CaT
RGGI
Saitama ETS
Shanghai pilot ETS
Shenzhen pilot ETS
Slovenia carbon tax
South Africa carbon tax
Sweden carbon tax
Switzerland carbon tax
Switzerland ETS
Tianjin pilot ETS
Tokyo CaT
UK carbon price floor
Ukraine carbon tax
Washington CAR
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other carbon tax, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Other ETS, please specify
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C11.1.
C11.1a
C11.1b
(C11.1b) Complete the following table for each of the emissions trading systems in which you participate.
Page 373 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Australia ERF Safeguard Mechanism
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
BC GGIRCA
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 374 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Beijing pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
California CaT
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
China national ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 375 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Chongqing pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
EU ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 376 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Fujian pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Guangdong pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Hubei pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 377 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Kazakhstan ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Korea ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 378 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Massachusetts state ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Zealand ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Ontario CaT
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 379 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Québec CaT
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
RGGI
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 380 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Saitama ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Shanghai pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Shenzhen pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 381 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Switzerland ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Tianjin pilot ETS
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 382 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Tokyo CaT
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Washington CAR
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 383 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Page 384 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other ETS, please specify
% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS 0 - 100
Period start date
Period end date
Page 385 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allowances allocated 0 - 99999999999
Allowances purchased 0 - 99999999999
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e 0 - 99999999999
Details of ownership
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Alberta carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
BC carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Chile carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
This question only appears if you select an emissions trading option in response to C11.1a.
C11.1b
C11.1c
(C11.1c) Complete the following table for each of the tax systems in which you participate.
Page 386 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Colombia carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Denmark carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Estonia carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Finland carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Page 387 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
France carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Iceland carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Ireland carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Japan carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Page 388 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Latvia carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Liechtenstein carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Mexico carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Norway carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 389 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Poland carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Portugal carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Slovenia carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
South Africa carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 390 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Sweden carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Switzerland carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
UK carbon price floor
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Ukraine carbon tax
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
Page 391 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Period start date 01/04/2017
Period end date 31/03/2018
% of emissions covered by tax 6.00 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 668,002.78 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
In the UK, meeting the requirements of the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme
(CRC), Cummins reported XYZ emissions and paid 668,002.78
Page 392 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other carbon tax, please specify
Period start date
Period end date
% of emissions covered by tax 0 - 100
Total cost of tax paid 0 - 999999999999
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
(C11.1d) What is your strategy for complying
with the systems in which you participate or
anticipate participating?
≤ 5000
(C11.2) Has your organization originated or
purchased any project-based carbon credits
within the reporting period?
No
New Row 1
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
This question only appears if you select a carbon tax system in response to C11.1a.
C11.1c
C11.1d
The strategy to comply with the UK CRC regulations is to first minimize emissions through energy
efficiency and low-carbon energy sources. We use our corporate database to track energy consumption
and associated emissions that is validated against each energy related utility invoice for accuracy.
This question only appears if you select “Yes” or “No, but we anticipate being regulated in the next three years” in response to C11.1.
C11.1d
C11.2
C11.2
C11.2a
(C11.2a) Provide details of the project-based carbon credits originated or purchased by your organization in the reporting period.
Page 393 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 2
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 3
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Page 394 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 4
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 5
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Page 395 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 6
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 7
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 396 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 8
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 9
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 397 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 10
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 11
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 398 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 12
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 13
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 399 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 14
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 15
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 400 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 16
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 17
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 401 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 18
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 19
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 402 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 20
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 21
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 403 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 22
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 23
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 404 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 24
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
New Row 25
Credit origination or credit purchase
Project type
Project identification (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 405 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Verified to which standard
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e) 0 - 99999999999
Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk
adjusted volume 0 - 99999999999
Credits cancelled
Purpose, e.g. compliance
(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal
price on carbon?
Row 1
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
Yes
Yes
No
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C11.2.
C11.2a
C11.3
Yes
C11.3
C11.3a
(C11.3a) Provide details of how your organization uses an internal price on carbon.
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 406 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 7.00 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
The internal carbon price is built into the Cummins financial analysis tool, which is mandatory for all
energy and GHG emission projects.
The Cummins carbon price is applied for all projects, except where local carbon taxes exceed the
corporate price; in these cases, the local price is applied.
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
The internal price on carbon was initially effective when it was implemented in 2009, but has since
become less important as a driver for energy efficiency or low-carbon energy investments. Instead,
Cummins energy and GHG goal attainment has become the primary driver across the Company.
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 407 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 408 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Page 409 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Page 410 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 411 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 412 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 8
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Page 413 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Objective for implementing an internal carbon
price
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
GHG Scope
No
No
No
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Navigate GHG regulations
Stakeholder expectations
Change internal behavior
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
Stress test investments
Identify and seize low-carbon opportunities
Supplier engagement
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Select all that apply:
Page 414 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Application (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton) 0 - 99999999999
Variance of price(s) used (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of internal carbon price
No
No
No
No
No
No
Impact & implication (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C11.3.
C11.3a
Shadow price
Internal fee
Internal trading
Implicit price
Offsets
Page 415 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on
climate-related issues?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Row 1
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 25.00 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
75.00
0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 1.00 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
C12. Engagement
In order to truly reduce global emissions, companies must engage with their value chain on climate-related issues. Questions in this module examine how organizations are working with their suppliers, customers and other partners.
This module provides data users with insight into the different types of activities in which organizations engage to influence public policy on climate-related issues.
The module also investigates whether organizations integrate non-financial metrics and data into mainstream financial reports which is aligned with the TCFD’s primary aim to have climate-related information disclosed in financial filings.
C12.1
Yes, our suppliers
Yes, our customers
Yes, other partners in the value chain
No, we do not engage
Select all that apply:
C12.1
C12.1a
(C12.1a) Provide details of your climate-related supplier engagement strategy.
Compliance & onboarding
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Cummins spends approximately $1 billion per month in goods and services
with its supplier partners. This translates into thousands of tons of material,
which must be mined, milled, packaged and shipped to the company’s
facilities. Therefore being good stewards of Cummins’ spend means taking
responsibility for the environmental footprint of the company’s supply chain.
Page 416 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 25.00 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
75.00
0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 1.00 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Cummins has introduced five initiatives as expectations
of its supply base. Cummins currently maintains policies and procedures to
support these initiatives and has also established goals that suppliers are
expected to join the company in achieving.
The company is introducing its goals to the top suppliers by spend.
They are the approximately top 250 suppliers, which represent about
50 percent of Cummins’ direct material spend. The company is setting the
expectation that these suppliers comply with the company’s transportation
management programs, its disposable packaging waste requirements,
Cummins’ responsible mineral sourcing requirements, prohibited materials
disclosures, and participate in energy/water management programs to reduce
their consumption and costs. The company gives them the tools to meet its
requirements and provides an email address (supplier.compliance@cummins.
com) so that they may ask questions as necessary.
Information collection (understanding supplier behavior)
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
In order to Cummins to develop a strategy to engage, we first must understand where our suppliers are in their own energy/greenhouse gas/climate response journey.
In 2017, we were able to add a questions about sustainability (adherence to 14001) as part of the supplier screening process with the intent of only selecting suppliers that met that criteria.
Page 417 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Page 418 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 419 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Page 420 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 421 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Page 422 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Select all that apply:
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 423 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
% of suppliers by number 0 - 100
% total procurement spend (direct and indirect) 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
(≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Comment (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 1
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 20.00 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 20.00 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Climate change performance is featured in supplier awards scheme
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your operational emissions (Scopes 1 &2)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your downstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Offer financial incentives for suppliers who reduce your upstream emissions (Scopes 3)
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate impacts on products and services
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Yes, our suppliers” in response to C12.1.
C12.1a
C12.1b
(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Collaboration & innovation
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate change impacts
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Cummins products in use are the company’s largest environmental impact and represent an estimated 99 percent of Cummins’ GHG footprint due to fossil
fuel use. Cummins’ biggest opportunity to expand its product stewardship beyond the upfront design of its products is in working with customers to improve the efficiency of the company’s
products in use. One of Cummins’ sustainability plan goals is to partner with its customers to improve the fuel efficiency of the company’s products in use, and by extension
reduce carbon dioxide (CO2). The company wants to cut CO2 emissions by nearly 16 million metric tons, saving customers up to $6.3 billion through greater fuel efficiency, by the end of 2020.
By 2020, Cummins expects to work with 20 percent of its customer base, touching nearly 2 million engines as it tailors engine specifications to customer applications. The company wants to
ensure customers have the latest tools to improve fuel efficiency.
Page 424 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Type of engagement
Since 2014, Cummins fuel economy projects have reduced fuel consumed by 815 million gallons, saved customers $3.3 billion and avoided 8.15 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. As
reported in our 2017 Sustainability report, we have nearly achieved our 2020 goal of a 3.5 million metric ton of carbon dioxide annual run rate reduction (97 percent goal achievement at the
end of 2017).
Page 425 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Page 426 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Type of engagement
Details of engagement
Size of engagement 0 - 100
% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5 0 - 100
Please explain the rationale for selecting this
group of customers and scope of engagement (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Impact of engagement, including measures of
success (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
This question only appears if you select “Yes, our customers” in response to C12.1.
C12.1b
C12.1c
Page 427 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C12.1c) Give details of your climate-related
engagement strategy with other partners in the
value chain.
≤ 5000
(C12.1d) Why do you not engage with any
elements of your value chain on climate-related
issues, and what are your plans to do so in the
future? ≤ 5000
(C12.3) Do you engage in activities that could
either directly or indirectly influence public
policy on climate-related issues through any of
the following?
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Focus of legislation Corporate position Details of engagement (≤ 2400)
Proposed legislative solution (≤
2400)
Cummins’ longstanding partnerships with the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense and other federal and state
agencies directly support international and national goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, petroleum consumption and dependency, and improved air quality as well as enhanced
military readiness.
These partnerships help Cummins lead the U.S. and other markets in competitiveness, technology and customer
success while reducing criteria emissions from the global transportation and distributed power generation systems . Cummins highlighted six such projects in its 2017 Sustainability report
(page 39) including work on solid oxide fuel cell technologies,; medium duty electric truck with spark-ignited range extender and other high efficiency vehicle technologies; class 6 electric truck
with diesel range extender engine; and advanced efficiency using engine, drivetrain, and vehicle technologies for Class 8 line haul trucks. The latter project, SuperTruck 2, is the followon project
to the very successful SuperTruck I demonstration project that Cummins completed with Peterbilt and other vehicle partners. Results from the multi-year project on a heavy-duty truck were a
75% increase in fuel
economy, a 43% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and truck that was 1,300 pounds lighter than a than 2009 truck.
This question only appears if you select “Yes, other partners in the value chain” in response to C12.1.
C12.1c
C12.1d
This question only appears if you select “No, we do not engage” in response to C12.1.
C12.1d
C12.3
Direct engagement with policy makers
Trade associations
Funding research organizations
Other
No
Select all that apply:
C12.3
C12.3a
(C12.3a) On what issues have you been engaging directly with policy makers?
Page 428 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Clean energy generation Support
Energy efficiency Support
Row 1
Cummins is building coalitions
among various stakeholders,
working with customers on solutions
using clean burning energy and
waste to energy and renewable
energy and educating policymakers.
Cummins government relations
department represents Cummins
solutions of combined heat and
power as well as waste to energy
solutions.
Row 2
Cummins is a member of
Department of Energy Better
Buildings, Better Plants Program and
is active in various industrial energy
efficiency groups, both sector
specific and general at national and
regional levels.
We promote and model industrial
energy efficiency practices and are
active with several government
programs for energy efficiency.
Page 429 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Energy efficiency Support
Other, please specify
Product Efficiency
Support
Row 3
Cummins pledged support for a new
Energy Management Campaign. This
campaign is an effort of CEM and the
International Partnership for Energy
Efficiency Cooperation to spur
international collaboration with a
goal of 50,001 global certifications
by 2020. Cummins will achieve ISO
50001 certification at a total of 40
sites by 2020. These 40 sites
represent 90 percent of Cummins’
energy footprint.
This campaign is an effort of CEM
and the International Partnership
for Energy Efficiency Cooperation
to spur international collaboration
with a goal of 50,001 global
certifications by 2020.
Row 4
Cummins is building coalitions
among various stakeholders globally,
working with customers,
government and other stakeholders
as well as educating policymakers
globally.
Cummins’ government relations
efforts in the United States include
working with Congress, the White
House, state governments, trade
associations and industry to
support the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in
developing greenhouse gas
regulations in the U.S. for heavy-
duty vehicles, and to broadly
educate policy makers about how
regulations, economic
development and competitiveness
can co-exist if developed properly.
Government relations also
advocates for power generation
systems using renewable energy
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
Page 430 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C12.3b) Are you on the board of any trade
associations or do you provide funding beyond
membership?
Yes
Row 1
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Consistent
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 2
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
New Row 11
New Row 12
New Row 13
New Row 14
New Row 15
New Row 16
New Row 17
New Row 18
New Row 19
New Row 20
New Row 21
New Row 22
New Row 23
New Row 24
New Row 25
This question only appears if you select “Direct engagement with policy makers” in response to C12.3.
C12.3a
C12.3b
This question only appears if you select “Trade associations” in response to C12.3.
C12.3b
C12.3c
(C12.3c) Enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation.
Advanced Energy Economy
AEE is an organization of businesses using policy advocacy, analysis, and education to bring about a prosperous economy based on secure, clean, affordable energy.
We are in agreement with their position.
China Internal Combustion Engine Industry Association
Without comprehensive national climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine the association’s position at this time. The association supports national efforts to reduce fuel
consumption.
Page 431 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 3
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Consistent
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 4
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 5
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 6
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 7
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Cummins has worked within CICEIA on fuel consumption activities, NS VI emission standard readiness and how to ensure industry-wide compliance in China.
Confederation of Indian Industry
The trade association supports international cooperation on climate change with nationally-determined pledges. Without comprehensive national climate change legislation, the Company
cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively within the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) to build consensus about the business value of addressing climate change and to advocate for stricter emissions
standards. The Company’s Vice President and Chairman of Cummins India Limited chairs CII’s Manufacturing Committee and the Vice President of Indian Government Relations serves on CII's
National Committee on the Environment, both of which influence the association’s position. CII advocates for the industry's viewpoint on climate change to the Indian Foreign Ministry and
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change through direct lobbying opportunities such as the COP21 negotiations in Paris in 2015.
The Diesel Technology Forum
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively in the DTF to encourage it to be supportive of fuel economy in vehicles and of energy efficiency programs in our sector
The Engine Manufacturers Association
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively in the EMA to encourage it to be supportive of engine efficiency and of energy efficiency programs in our sector.
The National Association of Manufacturers
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively in NAM to encourage it to be supportive of fuel economy in vehicles and of industrial energy efficiency programs in our sector. The company is encouraging the
organization to work more collaboratively with the EPA. Cummins' chief operating officer is on the board of directors.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Page 432 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 8
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Row 9
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Mixed
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 1
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 2
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 3
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively with the US Chamber to encourage them to be supportive of fuel economy in vehicles and of energy efficiency programs in our sector.
The American Trucking Association
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins works actively in the ATA to encourage it to be supportive of fuel economy in vehicles and of energy efficiency programs in our sector
The Business Roundtable
Without comprehensive climate change legislation, the Company cannot determine this group's position at this time.
Cummins has been a regular contributor to Roundtable’s annual sustainability report, including the 2017 report “Create.Grow.Sustain.” Cummins' CEO chairs the International Engagement
Committee and serves on the Executive Committee.
Page 433 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 4
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 5
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 6
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 7
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 8
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 9
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Page 434 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 10
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 11
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 12
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 13
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 14
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Page 435 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 15
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 16
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 17
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 18
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 19
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 20
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Page 436 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 21
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 22
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 23
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 24
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
New Row 25
Trade association (≤ 1000) ≤ 1000
Is your position on climate change consistent
with theirs?
Please explain the trade association’s position (≤
2400) ≤ 2400
Page 437 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
How have you, or are you attempting to,
influence the position? (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
(C12.3d) Do you publicly disclose a list of all
research organizations that you fund?
(C12.3e) Provide details of the other engagement
activities that you undertake. ≤ 5000
(C12.3f) What processes do you have in place to
ensure that all of your direct and indirect
activities that influence policy are consistent with
your overall climate change strategy?
≤ 5000
(C12.3g) Why do you not engage with policy
makers on climate-related issues? ≤ 5000
Row 1
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
Yes
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to C12.3b
C12.3c
C12.3d
This question only appears if you select “Funding research organizations” in response to C12.3
C12.3d
C12.3e
This question only appears if you select “Other” in response to C12.3.
C12.3e
C12.3f
The Company has several groups and processes in place to ensure that our advocacy is consistent with our environmental and climate strategies. A Cummins team called Environmental Policy &
Strategic Planning exists to analyze major environmental strategic opportunities and risks that affect the company globally; direct work with internal and external stakeholders to shape stances
and positions on environmental affairs that impacts Cummins; and coordinate efforts across complex environmental issues to ensure consistency and adherence to our environmental and
climate strategies across all activities including public policy advocacy. This team uses robust processes and guiding principles to direct Cummins’ environmental policy actions. Whether the
policy we are influencing is a regulation that focuses on reducing criteria pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) or improving fuel efficiency, Cummins’ policy principles ensure that we
always advocate for tough, clear, and enforceable policy. These principles and our environmental mission apply to all direct and indirect activities including external relations, partnerships, and
advocacy.
In addition to our environmental policy principles and processes, the Action Committee for Environmental Sustainability (ACES) shapes the activities and goal-setting of the stakeholder areas for
product in use and in design, facilities and operations, internal supply chain (logistics and packaging), employee engagement and communications and marketing. Through processes such as
monthly meetings, goal tracking, and disclosure, ACES ensures that the 10 environmental sustainability principles listed below are used to develop and adhere to Cummins’ climate strategy,
whether internal Company actions or external engagement.
The Company has 10 environmental sustainability principles - with the last four focusing on policy:
- Develop clean, efficient products
- Grow and develop new businesses
- Develop environmentally sustainable supply chains
- Make work spaces green spaces.
- Harness the energy of employees
- Engage in the community
- Help develop responsible regulations.
- Promote technology development.
- Advocate for incentives to accelerate progress
This question only appears if you select “Direct engagement with policy makers”, “Trade associations”, “Funding research organizations” and/or “Other” in response to C12.3.
C12.3f
C12.3g
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to C12.3.
C12.3g
C12.4
(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
In mainstream reports in accordance with TCFD recommendations
Complete
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Page 438 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Row 2
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Row 3
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Row 4
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
New Row 1
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
In voluntary sustainability report
Complete
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
In voluntary communications
Complete
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
In mainstream reports in accordance with TCFD recommendations
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 439 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 2
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 3
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 4
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 440 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 5
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 6
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 7
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 8
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 441 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 9
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 10
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 11
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 442 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 12
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 13
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 14
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 15
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 443 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 16
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 17
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 18
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 444 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 19
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 20
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 21
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 22
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
Page 445 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 23
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 24
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
New Row 25
Publication
Status
Attach the document (≤ 1) ≤ 1
Content elements
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This column is only for attaching the applicable document for this question, no text should be entered here.
Page 446 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Emission targets
Other metrics
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
C12.4
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Page 447 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
C13. Other land management impacts
This module provides the opportunity for disclosing on impacts - other than climate-related - of land management practices implemented in owned land and/or by suppliers.
Page 448 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional
information or context that you feel is relevant
to your organization's response. Please note that
this field is optional and is not scored.
≤ 9999
Job title (≤ 200)
Corresponding job
category
Chief Executive Officer
(CEO)
C14. Signoff
C-FI
Please note that completing this field is optional and will not be scored.
Please click the “File upload” button (paperclip icon) to drag and drop a file.
C14.1
(C14.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.
Row 1
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
C14.1
Page 449 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(SC0.0) If you would like to do so, please provide
a separate introduction to this module.
≤ 5000
Annual Revenue
0 - 999999999999999
(SC0.2) Do you have an ISIN for your company
that you would be willing to share with CDP?
ISIN country code (2
letters) (≤ 2)
ISIN numeric identifier
and single check digit
(10 numbers overall) (≤
10)
SC. Supply chain module
The SC module is for companies responding to the CDP climate change questionnaire at the request of one or more customers, who are members of CDP’s supply chain program.
This module has been developed following consultation with both suppliers and the member companies that are their customers. It provides further context to buyers regarding the procedures
adopted and/or actions taken by their suppliers. Organizations benefit from disclosing by increasing transparency and engaging with their buyers to further develop their sustainability.
Emissions located in the supply chain are around four times as high as those from direct operations. To meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, action at every level of the supply chain is needed.
Please note that your response to the SC module is not scored.SC0.0
SC0.0
SC0.1
(SC0.1) What is your company’s annual revenue for the stated reporting period?
Row 1
SC0.1
SC0.2
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC0.2.
SC0.2a
SC0.2
SC0.2a
(SC0.2a) Please use the table below to share your ISIN.
Row 1
Page 450 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 2
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
SC1.1
(SC1.1) Allocate your emissions to your customers listed below according to the goods or services you have sold them in this reporting period.
Page 451 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 3
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 4
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 5
Requesting member
Page 452 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 6
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 7
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Page 453 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 8
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 9
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Page 454 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 10
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 11
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Page 455 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 12
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 13
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 456 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 14
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 15
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 457 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 16
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 17
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 458 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 18
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 19
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 459 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 20
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 21
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 460 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 22
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 23
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 461 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 24
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 25
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 462 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 26
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 27
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 463 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 28
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 29
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 464 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 30
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 31
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 465 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 32
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 33
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 466 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 34
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 35
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 467 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 36
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 37
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 468 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 38
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 39
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 469 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 40
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 41
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 470 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 42
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 43
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 471 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 44
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 45
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 472 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 46
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 47
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 473 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 48
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 49
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 474 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 50
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 51
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 475 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 52
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 53
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 476 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 54
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 55
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 477 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 56
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 57
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 478 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 58
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 59
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 479 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 60
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 61
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 480 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 62
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 63
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 481 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 64
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 65
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 482 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 66
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 67
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 483 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 68
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 69
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 484 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 70
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 71
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 485 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 72
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 73
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 486 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 74
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 75
Requesting member
Scope of emissions
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Uncertainty (±%) 0 - 999999
Major sources of emissions (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Verified
Allocation method
Page 487 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Please explain how you have identified the GHG
source, including major limitations to this
process and
assumptions made (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
(SC1.2) Where published information has been
used in completing SC1.1, please provide a
reference(s). ≤ 5000
Allocation challenges
Please explain what
would help you
overcome these
challenges (≤ 2500)
Note that CDP’s disclosure platform supports a file import for this question.
SC1.1
SC1.2
SC1.2
SC1.3
(SC1.3) What are the challenges in allocating emissions to different customers, and what would help you to overcome these challenges?
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
SC1.3
SC1.4
Page 488 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(SC1.4) Do you plan to develop your capabilities
to allocate emissions to your customers in the
future?
(SC1.4a) Describe how you plan to develop your
capabilities. ≤ 5000
(SC1.4b) Explain why you do not plan to develop
capabilities to allocate emissions to your
customers. ≤ 5000
SC1.4a
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC1.4.
SC1.4a
SC1.4b
This question only appears if you select “No” in response to SC1.4.
SC1.4b
SC1.4
Page 489 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 2
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
SC2.1
(SC2.1) Please propose any mutually beneficial climate-related projects you could collaborate on with specific CDP Supply Chain members.
Page 490 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 3
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 4
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 491 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 5
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 6
Requesting member
Group type of project
Page 492 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 7
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 8
Page 493 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 9
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Page 494 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 10
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 11
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Page 495 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 12
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 13
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 496 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 14
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 15
Requesting member
Group type of project
Page 497 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 16
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 17
Page 498 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 18
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Page 499 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 19
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 20
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Page 500 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 21
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 22
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 501 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 23
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 24
Requesting member
Group type of project
Page 502 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 25
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 26
Page 503 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 27
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Page 504 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 28
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 29
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Page 505 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 30
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 31
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 506 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 32
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 33
Requesting member
Group type of project
Page 507 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 34
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 35
Page 508 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 36
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Page 509 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 37
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 38
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Page 510 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 39
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 40
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 511 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 41
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 42
Requesting member
Group type of project
Page 512 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 43
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 44
Page 513 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 45
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Page 514 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 46
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 47
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Page 515 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 48
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 49
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Page 516 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 50
Requesting member
Group type of project
Type of project
Emissions targeted
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to
be realized
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings 0 - 999999999999
Estimated payback
Details of proposal
(≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
(SC2.2) Have requests or initiatives by CDP
Supply Chain members prompted your
organization to take organizational-level
emissions reduction initiatives?
SC2.1
SC2.2
Page 517 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 2
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
SC2.2
SC2.2a
(SC2.2a) Specify the requesting member(s) that have driven organizational-level emissions reduction initiatives, and provide information on the initiatives.
Page 518 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 3
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 4
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Page 519 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 5
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 6
Requesting member
Page 520 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 7
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Page 521 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 8
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 9
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 522 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
New Row 10
Requesting member
Initiative ID
Group type of project
Type of project
Description of the reduction initiative (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Emissions reduction for the reporting year in
metric tons of CO2e 0 - 999999999999
Did you identify this opportunity as part of the
CDP supply chain Action Exchange?
Would you be happy for CDP supply chain
members to highlight this work in their external
communication?
(SC3.1) Do you want to enroll in the 2018-2019
CDP Action Exchange initiative?
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC2.2. Note that CDP’s disclosure platform supports a file import for this question.
SC2.2a
SC3.1
SC3.1
Page 523 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(SC3.1a) Identify which member(s), if any, have
motivated you to take part in Action Exchange
this year.
No
No
No
No
No
No
(SC3.1b) Select the types of emissions reduction
activities that your company would like support
in analyzing or in implementing in the next
reporting year.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
(SC3.1c) As part of Action Exchange, would you
like facility level analysis?
SC3.1a
AT&T Inc.
CNH Industrial NV
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV
Ford Motor Company
Nokia Group
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA)
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC3.1.
SC3.1a
SC3.1b
Energy efficiency: Building fabric
Energy efficiency: Building services
Energy efficiency: Processes
Fugitive emissions reductions
Low-carbon energy purchase
Low-carbon energy installation
Process emissions reductions
Transportation: fleet
Transportation: use
Product design
Behavioral change
Waste recovery
Green project finance
Other, please specify
Select all that apply:
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC3.1.
SC3.1b
SC3.1c
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC3.1.
SC3.1c
SC3.2
Page 524 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
(SC3.2) Is your company a participating supplier
in CDP’s 2017-2018 Action Exchange initiative?
Type of project
Details of proposal (≤
2500)
Select all that apply:Energy efficiency:
Building fabric No
Energy efficiency:
Building servicesNo
Energy efficiency:
ProcessesNo
Fugitive emissions
reductionsNo
Low-carbon energy
purchaseNo
Low-carbon energy
installationNo
Process emissions
reductionsNo
Transportation: fleet NoTransportation: use NoProduct design NoBehavioral change NoWaste recovery NoGreen project finance NoOther, please specify No
(SC4.1) Are you providing product level data for
your organization’s goods or services, if so, what
functionality will you be using?
(SC4.1a) Give the overall percentage of total
emissions, for all Scopes, that are covered by
these products. 0 - 100
SC3.2
SC3.2a
(SC3.2a) Describe how your company actively considered emissions reduction projects as a result of Action Exchange. If you do not have any emissions reduction activities
resulting from Action Exchange at any stage of implementation, please explain why not in the second column.
Row 1
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC3.2.
SC3.2a
SC4.1
SC4.1
SC4.1a
Page 525 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 2
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
This question only appears if you select “Yes, I will provide data” in response to SC4.1.
SC4.1a
SC4.2a
(SC4.2a) Complete the following table for the goods/services for which you want to provide data.
Page 526 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 3
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 4
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
Page 527 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 5
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 6
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 7
Page 528 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 8
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 9
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 529 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 10
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 11
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
Page 530 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 12
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 13
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
Page 531 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 14
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 15
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Page 532 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 16
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 17
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 533 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 18
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 19
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Page 534 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 20
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 21
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
Page 535 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 22
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 23
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 24
Page 536 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
New Row 25
Name of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Description of good/ service (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Type of product
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) (≤ 50) ≤ 50
Total emissions in kg CO2e per unit 0 - 999999999999
±% change from previous figure supplied -1000 - 1000
Date of previous figure supplied
Explanation of change (≤ 2400) ≤ 2400
Methods used to estimate lifecycle emissions
This question only appears if you select “Yes, I will provide data” in response to SC4.1. Note that CDP’s disclosure platform supports a file import for this
question.
SC4.2a
Page 537 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
New Row 1
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 2
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
SC4.2b
(SC4.2b) Complete the following table with data for lifecycle stages of your goods and/or services.
Page 538 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 3
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 4
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 539 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 5
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 6
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 540 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 7
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 8
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 541 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 9
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 10
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 542 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 11
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 12
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 543 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 13
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 14
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 544 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 15
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 16
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 545 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 17
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 18
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 546 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 19
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 20
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 547 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 21
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 22
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 548 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 23
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 24
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Page 549 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
New Row 25
Name of good/ service (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
Please select the scope
Please select the lifecycle stage
Emissions at the lifecycle stage in kg CO2e per
unit 0 - 999999999999
Is this stage under your ownership or control?
Type of data used
Data quality (≤ 2500) ≤ 2500
If you are verifying/assuring this product
emission data, please tell us how (≤ 5000) ≤ 5000
Name of good/ service
(≤ 2500) Initiative ID
Description of initiative
(≤ 2500) Completed or planned
Emission reductions in
kg CO2e per unit
0 - 999999999999
This question only appears if you select “Yes, I will provide data” in response to SC4.1. Note that CDP’s disclosure platform supports a file import for this
question.
SC4.2b
SC4.2c
(SC4.2c) Please detail emissions reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product.
New Row 1
New Row 2
Page 550 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
0 - 999999999999
(SC4.2d) Have any of the initiatives described in
SC4.2c been driven by requesting CDP Supply
Chain members?
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes, I will provide data” in response to SC4.1. Note that CDP’s disclosure platform supports a file import for this
question.
SC4.2c
SC4.2d
SC4.2d
SC4.2e
(SC4.2e) Explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members.
Page 551 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
Requesting member(s)
Name of good/service
(≤ 2500) Initiative ID
New Row 7
New Row 8
New Row 9
New Row 10
This question only appears if you select “Yes” in response to SC4.2d.
SC4.2e
New Row 1
New Row 2
New Row 3
New Row 4
New Row 5
New Row 6
Page 552 of 553
Cummins CDP Climate Change Questionnaire 2018 8222018
*In which language are you submitting your
response?
*Public or Non-Public
Submission *I am submitting to
*Are you ready to
submit the additional
Supply Chain Questions?
Public
Investors
Yes No, Submit Supply Chain
Questions Later
Customers Yes
*Please state the main reason why you are
declining to respond to Investors
*Please state the main reason why you are
declining to respond to your Customers
*Please confirm below
Yes
Submit your response
Before clicking 'Submit Supply Chain module', please make sure you have:Checked your Supply chain module answers
Selected 'Yes, Submit Supply Chain Questions now'
Saved your response
English
Please confirm how your response should be handled by CDP
Please read CDP's Terms for responding to Investors (2018 Climate Change) and Terms for responding to Supply Chain Members (2018 Climate Change)
I have read and accept the applicable Terms
Please refer to the Terms for an explanation of how CDP will use your data based on your selection.
I am submitting my response
Please see CDP's Privacy Policy
Page 553 of 553