12
1 29 September – 1 October, 2010 Dolce Sitges Resort |Barcelona, Spain EATPConference.org Dr Rob Feltham, Executive Director, Cubiks Dimmy van Zanten, Country Head NL, Cubiks Taking a Fresh Approach to a 360 Degree and Multi-Rater Feedback: Introduction of Innovative new “Forced-Choice” Assessment Format

Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

  • Upload
    dimmyvz

  • View
    519

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

See the innovation on 360 developed by Cubiks

Citation preview

Page 1: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

1

29 September – 1 October, 2010Dolce Sitges Resort |Barcelona, Spain

EATPConference.org

Dr Rob Feltham, Executive Director, CubiksDimmy van Zanten, Country Head NL, Cubiks

Taking a Fresh Approach to a 360 Degree and Multi-Rater Feedback:

Introduction of Innovative new “Forced-Choice”

Assessment Format

Page 2: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

22

Content • Why develop a new format for 360-degree

feedback?

• What does it look like?

• Benefits

• Questions/Discussion

EATPConference.org 2

Page 3: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

33

Why develop a new format?

• One of Cubiks clients, BP, had raised the question of how to develop a faster, easier way to complete 360. This new format should reduce the time investment by reviewers especially senior management.

EATPConference.org 3

Page 4: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

44

Besides time savings, we tackled

… the impact of HALO and HORNS effect

… the impact of central tendencyBy

Developing a Forced-Choice ‘Ipsative’ format

The approach has now been successfully applied by BP and several other international organsiations

Page 5: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

Classical 360 degree rating format

Page 6: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

Alternative forced choice format

Page 7: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

Reviewers then rank order their choices

Page 8: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

88

The forced choice approach can alternatively be applied at the level of

behavioural statements

Page 9: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

99

Sample Report Extracts

Page 10: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

Benefits

EATPConference.org 10

• A short, focused and purely developmental assessment that allows a quick rank ordering of key strengths and weaknesses

• Much less evaluative than the traditional approach, geared to a developmental discussion

• Can be used in conjunction with the traditional ‘scale’ approach if one needs also to benchmark employees’ competencies

• Forces reviewers to differentiate between strengths and development priorities instead of simply opting for mid range scores or rating everything the same

• Enables managers and subjects to prioritise and focus in on development needs

• User experience across BP and other organisations has been extremely positive to date

Page 11: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

1111

Questions/Discussion

EATPConference.org 11

Page 12: Cubiks Eatp Version 29092010

12

Thank YouQuestions Contact:

[email protected]@cubiks.com

Please complete the session evaluation that has been

distributed to you

EATPConference.org 12