CSU-Pueblo Student Survey Report · Similarly, with marijuana, respondents’ perceptions are likely worse than reality. Respondents believed that, on average, 13 percent of students

Prepared By: Corona Insights © Corona Insights, 2011 CoronaInsights.com

CSU-Pueblo Student Survey Report Baseline Report for Peter Webb Public Relations for the PDD Committee

CONTENTS

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Key Findings & Implications................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Overall Findings ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Findings by Gender ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 14

Findings by Class Level ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

Findings by Housing Location ........................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Findings by Vehicle or Non-Vehicle .................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Marijuana Use and Perceptions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Appendix A: Detailed Analysis Tables and Open-Ended Responses ............................................................................................................... 28

Appendix B: Survey Instrument.......................................................................................................................................................................... 87

Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OVERVIEW

Corona Insights, on behalf of Webb PR, conducted the following research to aid the development of a social norming campaign for CSU-Pueblo as

part of ongoing education efforts funded by the Persistent Drunk Driving Committee (PDD).

This research, conducted through the fall of 2011, works to identify: current student perceptions regarding alcohol and marijuana use and driving while

impaired; actual behavior regarding driving while influenced; and awareness of drinking and driving media messages. This initial survey’s goal was

twofold: gather data to help develop the social norming campaign and establish a baseline to measure future campaign effectiveness.

KEY FINDINGS & IMPLICATIONS

DRINKING, SIDE EFFECTS OF DRINKING, AND DRIVING AFTER DRINKING ARE PERCEIVED AS COMMON AT CSU-

PUEBLO.

Respondents believed that, on average, CSU-Pueblo students drink 9.0 alcoholic drinks per week.

When asked how often they believed the average student at CSU-Pueblo had experienced a list of negative side effects (e.g., memory loss,

missing class, etc.) in the past year, the vast majority of respondents believed that other students had experienced each negative side effect at

least once.

When asked specifically about other students driving after drinking, respondents, on average, believed that 35 percent of CSU-Pueblo students

had driven after drinking too much alcohol in the past year. Fifty-eight percent of students believed that other students “rarely” or “never”

designate a driver.

Alcohol is widely perceived to have a number of positive effects – especially social effects. The majority of students believe that drinking allows

them to feel more comfortable in social situations, connect with their peers, and have more fun. Alcohol is also perceived to be a central aspect

of social life for many campus groups and events.

Page 2

HOWEVER, PERCEPTIONS ARE TYPICALLY WORSE THAN REALITY.

Students reported drinking, on average, 4.5 drinks per week. Beer and hard liquor/mixed drinks were the third and fourth, respectively, most

common beverages consumed when hanging out with friends (water was first, followed by soda/pop). While the amount of drinks students

consumed varied widely, the majority of students (56 percent) consumed either one or two drinks per week, or none at all. A much smaller

proportion (13 percent) consumed more than 10 drinks per week on average. The majority of students reported drinking at a friend’s house,

where they live, or at private parties.

While students typically believed most students had experienced each negative side effect listed, the majority of students typically indicated

having never experienced each side effect in the past year. Having a hangover was the most common with 55 percent of students experiencing

this at least once in the past year.

The perception of driving after drinking is likely inflated as well. When asked how they got home the last time they drank outside their

residence, 55 percent said they had designated a driver. Eighteen percent self-reported having driven a vehicle after too much alcohol in the

past 12 months.

The majority of students took steps either before or after starting to drink to prevent themselves from driving. The majority of students also

reported having taken action at least once in the past 12 months to prevent someone else from driving after drinking.

LIKE ALCOHOL, PERCEPTIONS OF MARIJUANA USAGE ARE GREATER THAN REALITY.

Similarly, with marijuana, respondents’ perceptions are likely worse than reality. Respondents believed that, on average, 13 percent of students

at CSU-Pueblo have a medical marijuana card; three percent of students self-reported actually having a medical marijuana card.

Respondents believed an even greater percentage (48 percent, on average) of students at CSU-Pueblo use marijuana. Of the 97 percent who

reported not having a medical marijuana card, 27 percent self-reported using marijuana.

In regards to marijuana’s impact on driving, 72 percent indicated it had a slight or significant impact on one’s ability to safely drive. Fifteen

percent indicated “no impact” and 13 percent believed it had a positive impact. When asked how the consequences (i.e., cost, legal penalties,

severe or minor injury) of drinking and driving compared to using marijuana and driving, respondents were split. Forty to fifty percent typically

indicated “about the same”; 30 to 40 percent indicated “less than alcohol” and about 10 to 30 percent indicated “more than alcohol.”

Page 3

SELECT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SEGMENTS INCLUDE:

Freshmen reported drinking less and were less likely to report having experienced negative outcomes of drinking, including driving after

drinking, compared to other class levels.

Males, compared to females, reported drinking more and were more likely to report experiencing the listed negative outcomes of drinking.

Males were also more likely to report driving after drinking.

Students’ residence location and access to a vehicle are positively correlated with class level – the higher their class level the more likely they are

to live off campus (or an apartment on/adjacent to campus) and have access to a vehicle. Differences among these segments typically mirror

those between class levels.

SOME OF THE MOST COMMON SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT ALCOHOL ARE NOT THE MOST BELIEVABLE.

Parents were the most common source of information (64 percent) and were also one of the most believable sources. Health professionals

were the most believable source (69 percent “very believable”) and third most common source of information on alcohol (50 percent).

Other common “very believable” sources included school employees – counseling center, faculty and staff. While each of these were

considered “very believable” by roughly 40 percent of students, they were among the less common sources of information.

Friends, while the second most common source of information (58 percent) was one of the least “very believable” sources.

Page 4

METHODOLOGY

SURVEY INSTRUMENT

The survey instrument for this project was designed via a collaboration of key staff from Corona Insights and Webb PR along with input from

CSU-Pueblo. Concepts and questions were largely drawn from past research conducted for the PDD program at Western State College. Updates to

the survey ensured it was tailored to the campus of CSU-Pueblo and that the survey was capturing relevant information for the current year’s campaign.

The survey was also approved by CSU-Pueblo before being administered to any student.

SAMPLING METHOD AND SURVEY MODE

This survey implementation was completed by in-classroom surveys. Professors distributed the paper surveys in their classes and provided

necessary instruction. CSU-Pueblo selected the classes and managed distribution of surveys. Corona Insights received all completed surveys and

provided data entry and cleaning before analysis.

Data collection ran during the first part of September, 2011.

ANALYSIS

In total, 454 surveys were completed. This represents roughly 8.7 percent of students at CSU-Pueblo (based on 5,246 total students reported).

This response level is sufficient to achieve a maximum margin of error of ±4.4 percent at the 95 percent confidence level for the overall student

population.

To ensure that the findings were representative of the overall student body, Corona applied corrective weightings. The final sample was weighted

based on year in school and gender to ensure all class levels and both males and females were accurately represented. All analysis and findings of these

populations represent the weighted findings to more accurately describe these audiences’ opinions.

Analysis included examining several subpopulations, including statistical testing to verify differences observed. Subpopulations examined included:

Class level, gender, residence location (on- or off-campus), and vehicle ownership.

Page 5

DEMOGRAPHICS

The following tables summarize the general profile of weighted survey respondents of the Fall 2011 survey. These characteristics should be

considered as context and background when examining findings.

The primary difference between segments was seen within different classes (as well as ages). As students increase in class level (and age) they are

more likely to: live off-campus opposed to on-campus and have access to a vehicle. Some key differences between these groups were examined in this

report, and detailed tables can be found in Appendix A.

Demographic CharacteristicPercent of

RespondentsDemographic Characteristic

Percent of

Respondents

Gender Vehicle Access

Male 47% Yes 88%

Female 53% No 12%

Class Age

Freshman 30% 18 or younger 21%

Sophomore 20% 19 19%

Junior 21% 20 15%

Senior 23% 21 14%

Graduate 5% 22 or older 32%

Other 0% Mean Age 22.6

Activities Current Residence

Intercollegiate athletics 30% On-Campus Residence Halls 25%

Intramural or club sports 28% Apartments On or Adjacent to Campus 11%

Social fraternities or sororities 7% Off-Campus 64%

Religious or interfaith groups 19%

Political or social action groups 6%

Music and other performing art groups 15%

Student newspaper, radio, TV, magazine 13%

None of the above 34%

Page 6

OVERALL FINDINGS

Presented first are the overall, global findings from the Fall 2011 survey (Pre-2011).

THE MAJORITY OF STUDENTS CONSUME ALCOHOL IN MODERATION

When asked what type of beverage(s) they consume with friends, students at CSU-Pueblo most often responded water (75 percent), followed by

soda/pop (55 percent). However, beer (47 percent) and hard liquor/mixed drinks (45 percent) were the third and fourth most common options,

respectively (Q1). Graph below left.

Students indicated that, on average, they consumed 4.5 drinks per week. (Pictograph below right). However the majority of students consumed one or

two drinks (30 percent), or did not consume any alcohol in the average week (26 percent) (Q2) . Graph below right.

26%

30%

14%

17%

5%

8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

None 1 to 2 3 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 or more

Average Drinks Per Week (Q2)

2%

19%

21%

36%

39%

42%

45%

47%

55%

75%

Other

Wine

Energy drink

Coffee or tea

Juices

Sports drink

Hard…

Beer

Soda/pop

Water

Drinks Consumed with Friends (Q1)

Average Drinks Consumed per Week (Q2)

Distribution of Drinks per Week (Q2)

Page 7

11%

11%

15%

17%

27%

29%

39%

45%

54%

57%

70%

On-campus events

Residence hall

Not applicable

In a car

Community events

Apartments on/adjacent tocampus

Outdoors

Bar/restaurant

Private parties

Where you live

Friend’s house

Locations for Consumption (Q3)

Consumption most often occurred at a friend’s house (70 percent) and where they live (57 percent) (Q3). The proportion of students who listed each

location can be seen in graph at left.

Students primarily drank for social reasons. When asked about the

“effects” of alcohol, students indicated social reasons first, followed by

personal benefits, and looks. About one third of students also believed that

alcohol leads to the use of marijuana (Q6). Graph below.

34%

11%

11%

37%

47%

48%

61%

64%

67%

71%

75%

77%

Leads to the use of marijuana

Makes me look cool/sophisticated

Makes me more attractive

Makes other people more attractive

Gives me more confidence

Makes it easier to deal with stress

Allows people to have more fun

Facilitates connections with peers

Gives people something to talk…

Facilitates sexual activities

Enhances social activity

Breaks the ice

Perceived Effects of Alcohol (Q6) by Pre/Post

Social Activities

Internal Benefits

Appearances

Page 8

Other “effects” were also examined and specifically negative after effects. More than one-half (55 percent) of students had experienced a hangover

in the past year, 38 percent did something they later regretted, and 35 percent had experienced memory loss (Q11). Graph below highlights the percent of

students who had experienced each after effect at least once in the past year.

19%

55%

25%

38%

16%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Missed a class Had a hangover Driven a car whenyou've had toomuch alcohol to

drink

Did somethingyou laterregretted

Been hurt orinjured

Had memory loss

Percent that Experienced at Least Once in Past Year(Q11)

Page 9

1%

3%

5%

9%

11%

18%

19%

55%

Rode a bicycle

Public transportation

A taxi

Another person who hadalso been drinking

Other

Walked

Drove myself

A designated sober driver

Transportation home after drinking (Q4)

DRINKING AND DRIVING OCCURS FREQUENTLY

When asked broadly if they had ever driven a vehicle when they probably shouldn’t have due to alcohol consumption, over one third (39 percent)

responded yes. And when those students who had were asked if they had driven when they probably shouldn’t have due to alcohol in the last 12

months, 46 percent responded yes (Q13).

When asked specifically about the last time they consumed alcohol outside of their residence and how they got home, 19 percent indicated that they

drove to get home. Nearly as many walked home (18 percent), and the majority (55 percent) reported that they got a ride home from a designated sober

driver. (Q4).

Page 10

42%

47%

47%

63%

68%

Chose a location that was close so you could walk home

Arranged to have a friend available to come pick you up, just

in case

Made sure you had the number for alternative transportation

Arranged to sleep somewhere else so you wouldn’t have to drive

home

Selected a designated driver

Pre-Drinking Actions (Q17)

8%

17%

24%

46%

52%

52%

57%

67%

78%

81%

Rode a bike

Used public transportation

Called a cab

Asked a non-drinking person for a ride who wasn't your designated driver.

Asked someone else to drive your car home

Walked home

Left your car overnight and found another way home

Called to have a friend or relative come pick you up

Designated a sober driver

Spent the night somewhere besides home

Post-Drinking Actions (Q18)

32%

45%

48%

60%

65%

71%

82%

Restrained someone from getting into their car

Taken someone home with you to “sleep it off”

Hidden someone’s keys

Taken someone’s key from them

Asked another person to offer the intoxicated person a ride home

Offered to drive someone to their home when you weren’t planning to

Advised someone who you thought had too much to drink that they could not drive safely

Actions to Prevent Others from Driving after Drinking Alcohol (Q19)

Students generally were more likely to indicate taking action after starting to drink (Q18) opposed to before (Q17). In both cases, receiving a ride

from a designated sober driver was a common action taken to prevent driving (68 percent pre-drinking and 78 percent post). Post-drinking, 81 percent

of students reported having spent the night somewhere besides home. Similarly, 63 percent had arranged to sleep somewhere else pre-drinking. (Q17 &

18). Graphs below.

When asked whether during the past twelve months they had

taken any steps to prevent a person who was drinking from

driving, a large majority indicated having taken at least one such

action. The most common type of action was advising the person

that they had too much to drink to drive safely (82 percent). Other

methods were popular as well, with 71 percent of students offering

to drive for them and 65 percent asking another person to drive

them. More direct actions were slightly less common; although 60

percent of students reported having taken someone’s keys. (Q19).

Graph right.

Page 11

STUDENTS OVERESTIMATE THE ROLE OF ALCOHOL IN THE LIVES OF OTHER CSU-PUEBLO STUDENTS

Students believed the average amount of alcohol a typical student at CSU-Pueblo consumed per week was 9.0 drinks (Q5). This is double the

amount that students, on average, actually reported for themselves (4.5 drinks).

Not only did students

believe other students at CSU-

Pueblo drank more, they also

believed they experienced more

negative effects. Students

believed the vast majority of

students (greater than 90

percent in each case) had

experienced a listed effect at

least once (Q11). The graph below

highlights the percent of students who

reported having never experienced each

after effect in the past year compared

to respondents’ estimates of the

percentage of other students who had

never experienced these effects.

Finally, the perception of costs for a DUI among students was significantly lower than the actual cost. The average estimated cost given by

students was $5,053; which was largely driven by the number of students believing it cost less than $2,500 (49 percent). Thirty one percent believed a

DUI would cost $10,000 or more (Q16). The actual cost is just over $10,000, as cited by previous campaigns.

Perceptions versus actual self-reported behavior of the frequency of drinking and driving among other CSU-Pueblo students were also different.

When asked what percentage of their peers they think have driven after drinking too much alcohol in the past year, the average estimate was 35 percent

– nearly double the rate actually reported by students of 18 percent (Q13 combined and Q14).

19%

55%

25%

38%

16%

35%

96%98%

96% 97%93% 93%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Missed a class Had a hangover Driven a car whenyou've had too much

alcohol to drink

Did something youlater regretted

Been hurt or injured Had memory loss

Self Report vs. Perception of Others: Experienced at Least Once as a Result of Drinking (Q11 & Q12)

Reported- Self(Q10)

Estimated- Others(Q11)

Page 12

MEDIA AND INFORMATION

Radio ads and posters on campus had the highest overall awareness for media discouraging drinking and driving. Social media sites were seen less

than other media (more than 50 percent “never/almost never” or “hardly ever” had seen this media). Educational information about the effects of

marijuana and driving had the lowest awareness with only 21 percent of students responding “frequently” or “very frequently”. Of particular interest to

the social norming campaign, 48 percent had “never/almost never” or “hardly ever” seen or heard information about data collected from their school,

while 26 percent “frequently” or “very frequently” had seen media of this type (Q19). Graph below.

31%

27%

25%

23%

15%

12%

10%

26%

15%

29%

25%

23%

19%

12%

22%

23%

27%

26%

32%

31%

35%

15%

23%

10%

18%

21%

24%

30%

6%

12%

8%

8%

10%

14%

14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Educational information about the effects of marijuanaand driving

Ads in bars

A social media site

Information about data collected from your school

A website

Posters on campus

Radio ads

Media Awareness (Q22)

Never/Almost Never Hardly Ever Sometimes Frequently Very Frequently

Page 13

People close to students –parents and friends– are the most common sources of information regarding alcohol. (Q23) Graph below. While parents

were seen as a “very believable” or “somewhat believable” source by 81 percent of students, friends were less frequently viewed as believable (57

percent of students indicated friends were “very believable” or “somewhat believable”). The only source more believable than parents were health

professionals – 86 percent believed they were “very believable” or “somewhat believable” (Q24).

10%

17%

17%

20%

32%

38%

38%

47%

48%

50%

50%

58%

64%

The HOWL

Campus electronic message boards

RAs

Counseling center

School staff

School faculty

Online websites

Advertising: Radio, TV, print publications

Social media

Posters

Health professionals

Your friends

Parents

Information Sources for Alcohol (Q23)

0

14%

24%

24%

47%

37%

41%

20%

22%

16%

20%

69%

17%

51%

0

38%

42%

34%

32%

42%

39%

43%

50%

43%

49%

17%

40%

30%

0

16%

17%

18%

8%

11%

8%

23%

15%

24%

18%

5%

28%

10%

0

3%

4%

5%

3%

3%

3%

5%

5%

8%

4%

3%

9%

3%

0

29%

14%

18%

10%

8%

9%

8%

7%

9%

9%

6%

6%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

The HOWL

School newspaper

RAs

Counseling center

School staff

School faculty

Online websites

Advertising

Social media

Posters


Your friends

Parents

Believability of Information Sources for Alcohol (Q24)

Very Believable Somewhat Believable Somewhat Unbelievable Very Unbelievable Don't Know

Page 14

6.4

2.70

2

4

6

8

Males Females

Self-Reported Drinks/Week (Q2) by Gender

55%

40%36%

30%

23%

16%

54%

37%33%

21%

16% 15%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Had a hangover Did somethingyou laterregretted

Had memoryloss

Driven a carwhen I've had

too muchalcohol to drink

Missed a class Been hurt orinjured

Experienced Effects of Alcohol in Past Year (Q11) by Gender

Male

Female

FINDINGS BY GENDER

Presented in this section are key differences by gender on the Fall 2011 survey. Only notable differences between males and females are provided.

MALES REPORT GREATER ALCOHOL USE AND EFFECTS

Males and females differ greatly in numerous actions and outcomes related to alcohol

consumption. Specifically, there were significant differences in type of drinks consumed,

amount consumed, where consumed, and impacts of consuming alcohol.

On average, males reported greater consumption of alcohol – in fact more than twice

as much – in a given week compared to females (Q2). Graph at right.

Males were also more likely to have consumed alcohol at several of the listed places.

The largest differences between genders occurred for apartments on or adjacent to campus

(34 percent males vs. 24 percent females), outdoors (44 percent males vs. 34 percent

females), at community events (32 percent vs. 21 percent), and at residence halls (16 percent

vs. 7 percent). The only locations where the genders reported similar levels of alcohol

consumption were bars and restaurants, private parties, and where they live. (Q3).

In addition to consumption behavior, males were also more

likely to have experienced all of the negative consequences of

alcohol at least once in the past year. The largest difference

between genders was for self report of having driven a car when

they have had too much alcohol to drink. (Q11). Graph left.

Similarly, when asked how they got home the last time they

consumed alcohol, females were more likely to report having

designated a sober driver, while males were more likely to have

driven themselves, and to have walked home (Q4).

With respect to beliefs about the frequency of negative

consequences of alcohol experienced by other CSU-Pueblo

students, females reported slightly higher estimates than did

males for all effects listed (Q12).

Page 15

GENDERS DIFFER IN BEHAVIORS TO PREVENT DRUNK DRIVING

In addition to differences in frequency of driving after consuming too much alcohol, males and females reported different actions to prevent drunk

driving, both before and after drinking has begun. With respect to pre-drinking actions, females were somewhat more likely than males to report having

designated a sober driver (76 percent of females vs. 60 percent of males). However, males were more likely than females to have chosen a location that

was close enough so they could walk home (51 percent, vs. 35 percent of females) (Q17). There were also gender differences in post-drinking actions to

avoid driving. Males were significantly more likely than females to have ridden a bike, taken public transportation, or walked home; as well as slightly

more likely to have left their car overnight, called a friend or relative, spent the night somewhere else, or asked a non-drinking person (other than their

designated driver) for a ride. Females were slightly more likely than males to have ridden with a designated sober driver (80 percent of females vs. 75

percent of males) (Q18).

BELIEFS ABOUT THE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AND DRUNK DRIVING DIFFER BY GENDER

Males also believed the average CSU-Pueblo student consumed more alcohol than did females. Males believed the average student consumed 9.2

drinks per week, while females believed the average student consumed 8.6 drinks per week (Q5).

When asked to estimate the percentage of CSU-Pueblo students they

think have driven after having too much alcohol to drink, females gave

significantly higher estimates (38.4 percent on average) than did males (31.1

percent). (Q14).

Similarly, when asked how often they think other students designate a

sober driver when drinking alcohol, males were more likely to believe that it

happened frequently, while females were more likely to believe that other

students only rarely select a designated driver (Q15). Graph right.

Finally, students’ estimates of the cost of a DUI differed somewhat as a

function of gender. On average, males perceived a higher cost ($5,485) than

did females ($4,698). Both genders’ estimated well below the actual cost of a

DUI (Q16).

23%

19%

31%

43%

42%

32%

4%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Male

Female

Perception of How Often Students Desginate a Driver (Q15)

Never/Almost Never Rarely Frequently Always/Almost Always

Page 16

MALES AND FEMALES WERE MORE SIMILAR

IN BELIEFS ABOUT SOCIAL EFFECTS AND

SOCIAL INVOLVEMENT OF ALCOHOL

While males were generally more likely than females to

report having experienced negative after effects of alcohol,

genders did not differ in most of their beliefs about the

social and internal benefits of alcohol use. They did,

however differ in perceptions of alcohol’s effect on

external appearance, as males were significantly more likely

than females to report that alcohol makes other people

more attractive, and somewhat more likely to believe that

alcohol makes themselves more attractive. Females, on the

other hand, were more likely to believe that alcohol

consumption leads to the use of marijuana (Q10). Graph

right.

Males and females also largely agreed on the extent to

which alcohol is a central part of the social life on campus.

There were few differences between the genders’ for any of

the student groups listed, nor for community events or on-

campus events. However, males were more likely to report

that alcohol is a central part of the social life for athletic

events and sorority and fraternity activities (Q6).

40%

11%

8%

25%

48%

44%

63%

65%

66%

71%

73%

75%

29%

12%

14%

52%

47%

51%

59%

63%

69%

71%

77%

79%

Leads to the use of marijuana

Makes me look cool/sophisticated

Makes me more attractive

Makes other people moreattractive

Makes it easier to deal with stress

Gives me more confidence

Allows people to have more fun

Facilitates connections with peers

Gives people something to talkabout

Facilitates sexual activities


Breaks the ice

Perceived Effects of Alcohol (Q10) by Gender

Male

Female

Page 17

FINDINGS BY CLASS LEVEL

Presented in this section are key differences by class level on the Fall 2011 survey. Only notable differences between the classes are provided here.

In addition to the numerous differences between genders, responses to several survey items were highly differentiated as a function of class level.

In some cases, differences were seen between freshmen and all other class levels suggesting that the first year is pivotal with respect to freshmen

perceptions and behavior. However, the pattern of responses to many other questions was characterized by a linear trend – either increasing or

decreasing with each additional year of school.

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION INCREASES WITH CLASS LEVEL

Responses to number of survey items showed a tendency to change (increase

or decrease) with each class year. For example, when asked what type of drinks

they consume with friends juniors and seniors were more likely to list beer, hard

liquor/mixed drinks, and wine. Freshmen were the least likely to list each of

these. (Q1). Location of alcohol consumption also differed – bars/restaurants

and where they live were cited more often by as class year increased (especially

among seniors) while residence halls decreased for juniors and seniors (Q3).

Amount of alcohol consumed showed a similar pattern of increase with class

year; particularly for juniors, and seniors, while average drinks consumed were

similar between freshmen and sophomores (Q2). See graph at right. There was no

such increase with class level in perceptions of how much other students at CSU-

Pueblo drink - students at all class levels reported perceptions that were

substantially higher than actual (between 8 and 9.3 drinks)(Q5).

4.0 4.1 4.7 5.7

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

Self-Reported Drinks/Week (Q2) by Class

Page 18

CLASS LEVELS DIFFER IN EXPERIENCES AND ACTIONS.

When asked about their own experiences, older students (juniors and seniors in particular) were consistently more likely to have experienced the

effects listed (e.g. having a hangover, driving a car, doing something later regretted, etc.) and they were generally more likely to experience those effects

with greater frequency. The only effect that was not more likely among juniors and seniors was missing a class, for which sophomores reported the

highest rates, while freshmen were much less likely than the other three class levels (Q11). The graph below highlights the percent of students, by class, who ever

experienced each after effect.

When asked about other students experiencing the same effects, all class levels reported beliefs that other CSU-Pueblo students experience those

effects with high frequency, and there were few differences between class levels in these overestimates (Q12).

4%

50%

14%

30%

13%

31%31%

46%

18%

34%

15%

33%

28%

64%

32%

44%

21%

44%

26%

63%

38%

48%

18%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Missed a class Had a hangover Driven a car when I'vehad too much alcohol

to drink

Did something youlater regretted

Been hurt or injured Had memory loss

Percent that Experienced at Least Once in Past Year (Q11) by Class

Freshmen Sophomore Junior Senior

Page 19

One area of particular interest is actual drinking and driving. In a similar pattern to amount of alcohol consumed, self-reported having ever driven

after alcohol consumption increased with each class level, nearly tripling from freshmen to seniors (Q13). See graph below right.

When asked how they got home the last time they consumed alcohol, there were

also significant differences between classes. Juniors and seniors were significantly more

likely than freshmen and sophomores to report having driven themselves home; while

freshmen were somewhat less likely than the other three classes to report having

designated a sober driver (Q4).

In contrast to the above where self-reported driving after drinking increased with

class level (Q13), perceptions of what proportion of CSU-Pueblo students drove when

they probably shouldn’t have due to alcohol consumption were consistent across

classes. All classes estimated that 34 to 38 percent of other students had driven when

they shouldn’t have in the past year (Q14). Similarly, there were no significant

differences between classes in students’ estimates of how often other CSU-Pueblo

students designate a driver – only 4 to 7 percent believed that others students always or

almost always designate a sober driver when they drink alcohol (Q15).

PERCEPTIONS OF ALCOHOL’S EFFECTS DIFFER BY CLASS LEVEL

When asked about the effects of alcohol, there were significant differences between classes in perceptions of some social effects of alcohol. The

perception that alcohol allows people to have more fun decreased with class level – freshmen and sophomores were more likely than juniors and

seniors to report this effect. On the other hand, the perceptions that alcohol facilitates connections with peers, facilitates sexual activities, and makes

other people more attractive generally increased across class years (Q10).

There were also statistically significant differences in class levels’ perceptions of the cost of a DUI. Estimates increased with each year from

freshmen (about $3,300) to seniors (about $6,900) (Q16).

When it came to preplanning for transportation home from drinking, there were no significant differences between class levels, though seniors were

less likely on several statements to reply “yes” (Q17). However, some actions to keep from driving after students began to drink did differ by class level

(Q18). In particular, seniors differed from the other three class levels, as they were significantly more likely to have called a cab, as well as somewhat

more likely to have ridden a bike or taken public transportation. In many cases, sophomores and juniors were the most likely to have taken a post-

drinking action to avoid drinking and driving.

22% 26%46%

61%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Self-Reported Drinking and Driving (Q13) by Class

Page 20

In addition to actions taken to prevent one’s own drinking and driving, there were significant class level differences in select actions to prevent

others who have been drinking from driving (Q19). Freshmen were the most likely to report having taken or hidden someone’s keys, and the likelihood

of reporting these two actions decreased with each increase in class year (such that seniors were the least likely). Similarly, seniors were significantly less

likely than the other three class levels to report having restrained someone from getting into their car. Class level differences for other actions were less

significant.

MEDIA SOURCE AWARENESS VARIES BY CLASS LEVEL

There were also a number of class level

differences in sources of media information

regarding alcohol (Q22). Freshmen and

sophomores were the most likely to report

having seen nearly all media sources either

“frequently” or “very frequently”. This was

especially true for Posters on campus,

Information about data collected from your

school, and educational information about

the effects of marijuana and driving.

Sophomores were particularly likely to

report having seen websites discouraging

drinking and driving. Radio ads, however

were the most frequently encountered

source of educational information regarding

alcohol overall, and this did not differ by

class level. Graph left shows percentage of students

who encountered each source “frequently” or “very

frequently”, by class level.

15%

17%

30%

14%

34%

29%

43%

20%

13%

24%

16%

37%

36%

45%

21%

20%

40%

31%

33%

45%

46%

21%

33%

32%

42%

38%

45%

44%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

A social media site such as Facebook, MySpace, or Twitter discouraging drinking and driving

Educational information about the effects of marijuana and driving

A website discouraging drinking and driving

Information about data collected from your school regarding drinking behaviors

Ads in bars discouraging drinking and driving

Posters on campus discouraging drinking and driving

Radio ads discouraging drinking and driving

Percent that Saw Frequently/Very Frequently in Past Year (Q22) by Class

Freshmen Sophomore Junior Senior

Page 21

When asked where they get educational information regarding alcohol, students’ responses differed significantly by class level for nearly every

source (Q23). For most sources, awareness decreased as class level increased - higher proportions of freshmen and sophomores versus juniors and

seniors listed each source. These included parents, friends, school faculty, school staff, counseling center, and electronic message boards. On the other

hand, upperclassmen were more likely to indicate health professionals. Advertising (radio, TV, print publications) as a source of alcohol information

was frequently cited by sophomores and juniors. Graph below. Note: two sources not included in the graph (RAs and The HOWL) were indicated by less than 25

percent of students within all class levels, and did not differ significantly as a function of class level.

Students’ ratings of the believability of each source of alcohol information also showed some differences as a function of class level (Q24). As with

awareness of sources of information, believability of sources tended to be highest among freshmen and often decreased with class level. This was true

for school faculty, school staff, and school newspaper. Overall, class levels’ responses on the remaining sources often mirrored the overall student

population.

78%

68%

58%

52%

38%

47%

42%

48%

41%

27%

22%

66%64%

45%

63%

52% 51%

41% 41%

31%

21% 20%

57% 58%

46%

53% 54%

44%

37%34%

30%

21%

16%

62%

49%

42% 41%

45%

59%

36%

30%

26%

13%10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Parents Your friends Social media Posters Advertising:Radio, TV, print

publications

Healthprofessionals

Onlinewebsites

School faculty School staff Counselingcenter

Campuselectronicmessageboards

Source of Alcohol Information (Q23) by Class

Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior

Page 22

21%35%

47%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

On-Campus ApartmentOn/Adjacent to

Campus

Off-Campus

Drunk Driving (Q13) by Residence

FINDINGS BY HOUSING LOCATION

Presented in this section are key differences by on-campus, apartment on or

adjacent to campus, or off-campus residents on the Fall 2011 survey. Only notable

differences between the different types of residential living are provided here.

OFF-CAMPUS RESIDENTS REFLECT FINDINGS FOR HIGHER CLASS

LEVEL STUDENTS WITH RESPECT TO ALCOHOL

Differences between students as a function of housing location follow a similar

pattern as seen in the previous section with class level differences. In general, there

were fewer differences between on-campus, apartment, and off-campus residents than

were observed within the gender and class level segments. This can likely be explained

by the fact that most off-campus residents are also upperclassmen (Q28). Graph at right.

The number of drinks that students reported consuming in an average week did not differ

significantly by housing location (4.3 drinks for on-campus vs. 4.2 for apartment, and 4.5 for off

campus)(Q2). Residents of each housing location were also similar in their frequency of most types of

drinks consumed with friends; the largest exception was hard liquor/mixed drinks, which apartment

residents consumed more frequently (Q1).

However, there were differences in self-reports of having ever driven after drinking too much

alcohol, with significantly more off-campus residents having done so (47 percent vs. 35 percent of

apartment, and 21 percent of on-campus residents). This is consistent with the trend of greater

drinking and driving with an increase in class level segment. (Q13). Graph left.

There were also differences between residents in locations of alcohol consumption. Students

living in apartments on or adjacent to campus were most likely to consume alcohol in nearly every location listed. This was particularly true for private

parties, and (not surprisingly) apartments on or adjacent to campus. Adjacent apartment residents and off-campus residents were similarly likely to drink

where they live or outdoors, and both were significantly more likely to drink in these two locations than were on-campus residents. Off-campus

residents were also more likely to drink in bars or restaurants. Finally, on-campus residents were more likely than off-campus residents to drink in a car,

at a residence hall, or at on-campus events (although apartment residents still had the highest rates of drinking at each of these locations as well). The

most common drinking location for all groups was a friend’s house; however, likelihood of this location did not differ significantly as a function of

students’ housing locations. (Q3). Graph top right of next page.

4%

10%

27%

53%

8%

21%

21%

2%

88%

69%

52%

45%

Senior

Junior

Sophomore

Freshman

Class by Housing (Q28)

On-Campus Apartment On/Adjacent to Campus Off-Campus

Page 23

13%

18%

25%

18%

32%

16%

37%

30%

50%

69%

23%

25%

31%

34%

41%

43%

64%

66%

67%

76%

8%

6%

11%

29%

41%

56%

64%

21%

53%

69%

On-campus events

Residence hall

In a car

Community events

Outdoors

Bar/restaurant

Where you live

Apartments on or adjacent tocampus

Private parties

Friend’s house

Location of Alcohol Consumption (Q3) by Residence

Off-Campus

Apartment On/Adjacent toCampus

On-Campus

CONSEQUENCES AND BELIEFS

CONCERNING ALCOHOL

The pattern of differences between on-campus,

apartment on or adjacent to campus, and off-campus

residents resembled that observed between class levels for

perceptions that drinking is a central part of the social life

of some campus groups and events. Students living off or

an apartment on or adjacent to campus were more likely

to report this belief for students living off campus and for

community events; while a higher proportion of on-

campus students believed that drinking is central to the

social life of students 25 and older and for on campus

events. These significant differences align with those

observed between freshmen and upperclassmen (in the

comparison of class level segments). Students who live in

apartments on or adjacent to campus – primarily

sophomores and juniors – were the most likely to believe

that alcohol is a central to social life for nearly all groups

listed (with the exception of sorority and fraternity

members and students age 25 and older). (Q6).

Only a few other significant differences in alcohol-

related actions and perceptions were observed between

on-campus and off-campus residents:

There were differences in the perception of how often other the proportion of other CSU-Pueblo students who had driven a vehicle after they

had too much alcohol to drink (on campus estimated 33.7 percent, apartment residents 36.1 percent, and off-campus residents 35.4 percent).

(Q14).

Average estimates of the cost of a DUI increased drastically from on-campus residents ($2,369) to apartment residents ($4,385) to off-campus

residents ($6,199). (Q16).

A greater proportion of apartment residents reported having missed a class as a negative effect of alcohol consumption (34 percent apartment

residents, versus 14 percent and 19 percent of on- and off-campus residents, respectively). (Q11).

Page 24

MEDIA AND OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT ALCOHOL

On-campus and off-campus residents differed somewhat in their reports of having seen or heard some media sources. In particular, on-campus

residents were significantly more likely to indicate having encountered information about data collected from the school regarding drinking behaviors

(45 percent of on-campus residents indicated “frequently” or “very frequently” versus 17 percent and 20 percent for apartment and off-campus

residents, respectively). On-campus residents also reported somewhat higher awareness for Posters and Social Media. (Graphs below). Reports of

encountering all other media sources were more similar for on- campus, apartment, and off-campus residents (Q22).

When asked where they get information regarding alcohol, parents and online websites were the only sources that showed statistically significant

differences between on-campus and off-campus residents. Consistent with the class level findings (in which freshmen were more likely than other

classes to list parents), a greater proportion of on-campus residents listed this source (78 percent versus 58 percent apartment and 59 percent off-

campus). On-campus residents were also more likely to list online websites as a source of information regarding alcohol (48 percent on-campus vs. 30

percent apartment and 36 percent off-campus). (Q23).

Finally, there were some significant differences in ratings of believability of sources as a function of residence. Compared to on-campus residents,

off-campus residents gave higher believability ratings for social media (72 percent of apartment residents and 61 percent of off-campus residents rated

as “somewhat/very believable”, versus 47 percent of on-campus residents), as well as online websites (75 percent apartment, 65 percent off-campus,

and 54 percent on-campus). (Q24).

8%

5%

15%

13%

20%

21%

31%

38%

29%

25%

20%

25%

24%

17%

9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

On-Campus

Apartment On/Adjacent to Campus

Off-Campus

Posters


12%

18%

28%

16%

39%

26%

28%

26%

26%

32%

10%

14%

13%

7%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

On-Campus


Off-Campus

Information about data collected from your school


8%

5%

15%

13%

20%

21%

31%

38%

29%

25%

20%

25%

24%

17%

9%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

On-Campus


Off-Campus

Posters


17%

17%

30%

20%

36%

31%

38%

29%

22%

13%

5%

11%

11%

12%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

On-Campus


Off-Campus

Social media sites (such as Facebook, Myspace)


Page 25

93%

95%

85%

78%

Senior

Junior

Sophomore

Freshman

Motor Vehicle by Class (Q29)

Vehicle Access

FINDINGS BY VEHICLE OR NON-VEHICLE

Presented in this section are key differences by vehicle access or non-vehicle access on the Fall 2011 survey. Only notable differences between

the students who do or do not have access to a motorized vehicle while at CSU-Pueblo are presented here.

DIFFERENCES BY VEHICLE ACCESS REFLECT CLASS LEVEL DIFFERENCES

As observed with the housing location segments, there was a relationship between students year in school and whether or not they have access to a

motor vehicle - in particular, freshmen and sophomores were less likely than upperclassmen to have access to a vehicle while at school. Therefore, the

majority of differences between students with and without vehicles resemble the pattern of findings observed by class segment.

Differences as a function of whether or not students have access

to motor vehicles while at school were not as numerous as what was

observed in other segment breakdowns. Most actions concerning the

use of alcohol did not differ between these groups. Students with

vehicle access reported somewhat higher levels of alcohol

consumption in the average week (4.5 drinks, versus 3.8 for non-

vehicle students); however this difference was not statistically

significant (Q2). There were also no significant differences in types

of drinks consumed (Q1).

Students did differ as a function of vehicle access in the

locations of alcohol consumption. Specifically, students with vehicles

were more likely (versus those without) to have consumed alcohol in

a bar or restaurant (48 percent vehicle vs. 19 non-vehicle) or where

they live (59 percent vehicle vs. 43 percent non-vehicle). On the

other hand, students without vehicle access were more likely to

report having consumed alcohol in a car (30 percent non-vehicle vs.

15 percent vehicle. (Q3).

Perhaps not surprisingly, when asked how they got home the last time they consumed alcohol, students with vehicle access were more likely to

indicate that they drove themselves (21 percent vehicle vs. 2 percent non-vehicle). Students without vehicle access were somewhat more likely to report

that they walked home; however this difference was not statistically significant (Q4). Also unsurprisingly, students with vehicle access were much more

likely to report that they had at some point driven a vehicle after having too much to drink (42 percent vehicle vs. 20 percent non-vehicle). (Q13).

Page 26

There was somewhat of a difference between students with and without vehicle access in their estimates of the proportion of other CSU-Pueblo

students who have driven after they’ve had too much alcohol to drink. Students without vehicles estimated that 39.9 percent had done so, compared

with an average estimate of only 34.3 percent among students with vehicle access. (Q14).

PERCEPTIONS OF OTHER STUDENTS’ ALCOHOL USE AND ITS EFFECTS DID NOT DIFFER

As observed for actions and experiences related to alcohol, perceptions about other students’ alcohol consumption and its consequences, as well as

its role in campus life, did not differ greatly as a function of vehicle access. Both vehicle and non-vehicle access students gave roughly similar estimates

for the number of drinks that other CSU-Pueblo students consume in a week (9.0 drinks estimated by students with vehicle access, versus 8.5 drinks by

those without) (Q5). Nor were there statistically significant differences as a function of vehicle access in beliefs about the effects of alcohol (Q10).

Page 27

MARIJUANA USE AND PERCEPTIONS

Presented in this section are findings for survey questions related to marijuana use and estimates of the marijuana use of other students on the Fall

2011 survey. Overall findings are presented, along with notable differences by segment.

STUDENTS OVERESTIMATE THE MARIJUANA USE OF OTHERS

When students were asked whether they have a medical marijuana card, three percent reported that they do. Of the 97 percent of all students who do not have a medical marijuana prescription, 27 percent reported that they use marijuana. There were some differences in marijuana use as a function of demographic segments. (Q7).

By class level: Sophomores and Juniors were slightly more likely to report marijuana use (31 percent each) than were seniors (28 percent) and freshmen (25 percent).

By Gender: Males were significantly more likely to report marijuana use (34 percent versus 20 percent of females).

Housing location: On-campus residents were the most likely to use marijuana (36 percent), followed by students living in apartments on or adjacent to campus (32 percent), and then students living off-campus (23 percent).

Vehicle access: Students who do not have access to a motor vehicle were substantially more likely to report using marijuana (39 percent vs. 26 percent of students who have access to a vehicle).

Interestingly, when asked to estimate the proportion of other CSU-Pueblo students who use marijuana, the average estimate was 48.4 percent – substantially higher than the 27 percent actually reported (Q9). Students also overestimated the proportion of other CSU-Pueblo students who have a prescription for marijuana (the average estimate was 13 percent) (Q8).

MOST STUDENTS BELIEVE THAT MARIJUANA USE IMPAIRS DRIVING

When asked about the effect of marijuana use on one’s ability to drive, the majority of students (72 percent) reported the belief that it has either a slight or significant negative impact. Another 15 percent believed it has no impact, and 13 percent thought that it has a slight or significant positive impact. (Q20).

Finally, students were asked to compare the possible consequences of marijuana use to those of alcohol, including costs associated with getting caught, legal penalties, and, chance for severe or minor injury (Q21). With respect to injury, students generally believed that the consequences of marijuana are the same or less than those for alcohol. For the legal costs and penalties, beliefs varied widely – students were split almost evenly between the three response options (although slightly more believed that the consequences are the same as alcohol).

Page 28

APPENDIX A: DETAILED ANALYSIS TABLES

AND OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES

OVERVIEW

The following pages contain detailed analysis tables for each of the questions asked on the survey. Each of these tables presents the results of the

question cross-tabulated by a variety of demographic segments:

Class Gender Residence Vehicle Access

These analyses are useful in not only presenting the tabulations of the results, but also drawing comparisons about how different groups of

respondents vary in their responses. All open-ended responses have been reproduced verbatim, with no changes to grammar, spelling, or content.

INTERPRETATION

These tables are presented in order to give readers a general sense about how various groups responded to the survey.

In each table, the row heading contains all of the answers given by respondents to the question. The column heading contains each of the various subpopulations being examined (e.g. class, gender). Therefore, the distribution of answers to each question is shown in each vertical column.

Note that the percentages provided in these tables may vary slightly from those shown in the report (typically 1 percent or less) due to rounding

and/or variances in the way that “no reply” responses are handled.

Page 29

SECTION 1: ABOUT ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION

QUESTION 1: WHEN HANGING OUT OR SOCIALIZING WITH FRIENDS, WHAT DO YOU TYPICALLY DRINK?

Other

chocolate milk

codene

depends on the occasion. party=alcohol

iced tea

kentuky delux

lemonade

milk

milk

pickle juice

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

When hanging out orsocializing with friends,what do you...

Beer

Coffee or tea

Energy drink

Hard liquor/mixeddrink

Juices

Soda/pop

Sports drink

Water

Wine

Other

452 84 103 126 100 207 242 89 59 300 401 48

443 133 88 92 99 205 235 108 50 281 386 54

47% 34% 44% 59% 58% 63% 34% 37% 54% 51% 48% 43%

36% 34% 32% 34% 42% 26% 45% 28% 27% 41% 37% 29%

21% 28% 26% 16% 14% 26% 17% 26% 21% 19% 21% 21%

45% 44% 44% 51% 50% 43% 48% 40% 70% 43% 46% 42%

39% 46% 42% 40% 36% 33% 46% 47% 59% 33% 39% 42%

55% 62% 59% 53% 46% 54% 57% 67% 50% 51% 54% 64%

42% 63% 43% 36% 31% 53% 33% 59% 43% 36% 41% 50%

75% 81% 80% 73% 73% 75% 76% 82% 83% 72% 75% 79%

19% 7% 14% 25% 26% 15% 22% 10% 16% 23% 20% 13%

2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3%

Page 30

QUESTION 2: ON AVERAGE, HOW MANY DRINKS (BEER, WINE, AND LIQUOR) DO YOU CONSUME PER WEEK?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Please enter number ofdrinks on average.

None

1-2

3-4

5-9

10-14

15 or more

Mean

Median

439 133 87 91 96 204 232 108 49 278 382 54

26% 30% 26% 21% 24% 19% 32% 28% 14% 26% 25% 29%

30% 35% 32% 28% 27% 27% 33% 38% 29% 28% 30% 31%

14% 13% 13% 19% 9% 15% 13% 7% 22% 15% 15% 9%

17% 11% 18% 20% 20% 18% 17% 13% 26% 18% 17% 17%

5% 4% 7% 4% 9% 7% 4% 4% 3% 6% 5% 8%

8% 8% 4% 9% 11% 14% 2% 10% 6% 7% 8% 6%

4.5 4.0 4.1 4.7 5.7 6.4 2.7 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.5 3.8

2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Page 31

QUESTION 3: WHERE HAVE YOU CONSUMED ALCOHOL IN THE PAST YEAR?

Other

at my mom's

back home

casinos

club

concerts

grandparents house with parent supervision

home

in kmart bathroom

Mexico

noneiced tea

occasional toast (sip) only

parents house

parties

vacation

with dinner @ home

work

work meeting @ a bar

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Where have youconsumed alcohol in thepast year? Please...

Not applicable

On-campus events

Community events

Bar/restaurant

In a car

Residence hall

Apartments on oradjacent to campus

Where you live

Friend’s house

Private parties

Outdoors

Other

451 83 103 127 99 206 242 89 59 299 400 48

441 132 88 93 98 204 234 108 50 279 384 54

15% 23% 15% 10% 10% 14% 16% 21% 6% 15% 14% 24%

11% 6% 14% 15% 14% 15% 7% 13% 23% 8% 10% 15%

27% 16% 24% 32% 42% 32% 23% 18% 34% 29% 28% 23%

45% 12% 38% 50% 81% 45% 44% 16% 43% 56% 48% 19%

17% 16% 18% 18% 20% 21% 13% 25% 31% 11% 15% 30%

11% 11% 18% 12% 7% 16% 7% 18% 25% 6% 10% 17%

29% 18% 35% 41% 31% 34% 24% 30% 66% 21% 27% 39%

57% 35% 58% 69% 74% 59% 56% 37% 64% 64% 59% 43%

70% 68% 72% 73% 72% 73% 67% 69% 76% 69% 70% 69%

54% 47% 58% 57% 58% 56% 52% 50% 67% 53% 53% 56%

39% 36% 37% 45% 41% 44% 34% 32% 41% 41% 39% 38%

4% 2% 2% 4% 6% 3% 4% 2% 2% 4% 4% -

Page 32

QUESTION 4: THINK ABOUT THE LAST TIME THAT YOU CONSUMED ALCOHOL OUTSIDE OF YOUR RESIDENCE.

HOW DID YOU GET HOME?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Think about the lasttime that you consumedalcohol outsi...

Not applicable - I don’tdrink alcohol

Drove myself

A designated soberdriver

Another person who hadalso been drinking

A taxi

Public transportation

Walked

Rode a bicycle

Other

450 84 102 126 99 205 242 89 59 298 399 48

441 133 87 92 98 204 235 108 50 279 384 54

13% 20% 12% 10% 10% 12% 15% 21% 6% 12% 12% 22%

19% 8% 12% 26% 29% 22% 16% 7% 18% 24% 21% 2%

55% 49% 61% 58% 60% 48% 60% 50% 63% 54% 54% 58%

9% 6% 9% 13% 9% 10% 8% 10% 9% 9% 9% 11%

5% 2% 3% 7% 8% 6% 4% 4% 7% 6% 6% 2%

3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 5% - 2% 2% 5%

18% 14% 22% 20% 22% 25% 13% 26% 28% 14% 17% 29%

1% - - 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% - 1% 1% -

11% 22% 7% 9% 4% 13% 9% 17% 2% 10% 11% 9%

Page 33

Other 1 beverage

20

already home

already home

another person

didn't get home

didn't go home

don't drink

don't drink outside of home

girlfriend drove

happened at my house

husband

I stayed the night

I stayed where I was

I was home

longboard

slept and stayed at the party

slept over

slept there

spent the night

stayed at a friends house

stayed at friends house were we drank

stayed over

stayed overnight

stayed overnight

stayed the night

stayed the night

stayed the night at a friends house

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there

stayed there most of the time

stayed where I was

stayed where i was

waited and then drove home

waited until morning

with family members who did not drink

Page 34

QUESTION 5: ON AVERAGE, HOW MANY DRINKS (BEER, WINE, AND LIQUOR) DO YOU THINK THE AVERAGE

STUDENT AT CSU-PUEBLO CONSUMES PER WEEK?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Please enter number ofdrinks on average.

None

1-2

3-4

5-9

10-14

15 or more

Mean

Median

437 130 87 93 97 204 229 105 50 278 380 54

5% 9% 3% 3% 3% 6% 4% 8% 1% 4% 4% 13%

4% 5% 4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 6% 4% 3% 4% 6%

13% 11% 21% 9% 11% 11% 15% 14% 19% 12% 14% 9%

39% 37% 35% 45% 42% 34% 43% 35% 34% 42% 40% 33%

22% 21% 24% 23% 18% 24% 20% 23% 22% 22% 22% 22%

17% 18% 13% 17% 21% 20% 14% 14% 21% 17% 17% 17%

9.0 9.2 8.0 9.2 9.3 9.2 8.6 8.6 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.5

7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 6.0

Page 35

QUESTION 6: AT CSU-PUEBLO, DRINKING IS A CENTRAL PART OF THE SOCIAL LIFE OF THE FOLLOWING:

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Male students

Yes

No

427 82 99 119 93 191 233 86 58 279 377 47

421 130 85 87 92 191 227 104 49 264 364 53

93% 94% 92% 91% 94% 92% 94% 92% 95% 93% 93% 90%

7% 6% 8% 9% 6% 8% 6% 8% 5% 7% 7% 10%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Female students

Yes

No

423 82 96 118 93 190 231 85 58 277 374 47

418 130 82 87 92 190 225 103 49 262 362 53

83% 85% 82% 79% 82% 83% 83% 83% 81% 83% 83% 81%

17% 15% 18% 21% 18% 17% 17% 17% 19% 17% 17% 19%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Students ages 18-24

Yes

No

432 82 100 121 93 194 235 86 58 284 382 47

425 130 86 89 92 194 228 104 49 268 368 53

97% 96% 96% 96% 99% 95% 99% 94% 100% 98% 97% 94%

3% 4% 4% 4% 1% 5% 1% 6% - 2% 3% 6%

Page 36

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Students ages 25+

Yes

No

408 80 93 112 89 184 221 84 51 269 362 43

403 127 80 82 88 185 215 102 44 253 350 50

59% 70% 60% 45% 56% 60% 58% 69% 46% 57% 57% 70%

41% 30% 40% 55% 44% 40% 42% 31% 54% 43% 43% 30%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Students living in off-campus housing

Yes

No

406 82 92 114 85 182 221 83 53 266 360 43

403 130 79 84 84 184 215 101 45 252 350 50

78% 69% 83% 84% 80% 76% 79% 65% 88% 81% 78% 78%

22% 31% 17% 16% 20% 24% 21% 35% 12% 19% 22% 22%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Students living in on-campus housing

Yes

No

420 81 94 117 93 188 229 85 55 276 371 46

414 128 81 86 92 189 222 103 47 260 359 53

86% 85% 86% 89% 86% 86% 86% 91% 95% 82% 86% 88%

14% 15% 14% 11% 14% 14% 14% 9% 5% 18% 14% 12%

Page 37

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Athletes

Yes

No

408 79 91 113 91 185 220 84 52 268 362 43

403 125 78 83 90 187 213 102 44 253 351 49

62% 44% 65% 66% 74% 68% 57% 50% 67% 66% 63% 59%

38% 56% 35% 34% 26% 32% 43% 50% 33% 34% 37% 41%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Sorority and fraternitymembers

Yes

No

415 81 91 116 92 185 227 84 54 273 367 45

410 128 78 85 91 187 220 103 46 257 356 51

87% 85% 84% 85% 92% 89% 85% 76% 82% 91% 87% 80%

13% 15% 16% 15% 8% 11% 15% 24% 18% 9% 13% 20%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Other student groups

Yes

No

282 64 68 81 55 137 145 64 39 179 247 35

287 102 59 60 55 141 146 80 34 173 247 40

39% 27% 49% 42% 51% 38% 40% 37% 53% 37% 38% 45%

61% 73% 51% 58% 49% 62% 60% 63% 47% 63% 62% 55%

Page 38

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Community events

Yes

No

377 74 84 107 81 166 210 79 52 244 337 39

372 117 72 79 81 168 203 95 45 230 327 44

41% 26% 42% 43% 54% 37% 44% 28% 51% 45% 42% 36%

59% 74% 58% 57% 46% 63% 56% 72% 49% 55% 58% 64%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Athletic events

Yes

No

390 78 87 110 84 180 209 81 50 257 347 42

387 124 75 80 83 181 204 98 43 244 338 48

55% 46% 54% 55% 62% 62% 48% 47% 61% 57% 55% 53%

45% 54% 46% 45% 38% 38% 52% 53% 39% 43% 45% 47%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

On-campus events

Yes

No

371 75 83 103 81 169 200 79 47 242 329 40

370 119 71 76 80 172 195 96 40 230 322 46

30% 27% 30% 28% 31% 32% 28% 32% 26% 30% 29% 34%

70% 73% 70% 72% 69% 68% 72% 68% 74% 70% 71% 66%

Page 39

Other Student Groups

any that exist

babes

most college students

non-traditional

Other Events

a party

everything

parties

parties

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Sorority and fraternityactivities

Yes

No

387 79 85 107 83 172 214 81 52 252 345 41

385 125 73 79 83 176 207 99 44 239 337 47

66% 70% 59% 63% 64% 73% 61% 62% 54% 70% 67% 60%

34% 30% 41% 37% 36% 27% 39% 38% 46% 30% 33% 40%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Other events

Yes

No

159 37 44 38 31 84 75 37 21 101 138 21

162 59 38 27 31 88 74 46 19 97 140 22

23% 19% 25% 16% 32% 19% 27% 19% 26% 24% 20% 38%

77% 81% 75% 84% 68% 81% 73% 81% 74% 76% 80% 62%

Page 40

QUESTION 7: DO YOU HAVE A MEDICAL MARIJUANA CARD?

QUESTION 7B: (IF NO) DO YOU USE MARIJUANA?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Do you have a medicalmarijuana card?

No

Yes

448 84 100 125 100 204 241 86 58 300 399 46

440 133 86 92 99 203 234 106 49 281 384 53

97% 95% 97% 99% 96% 94% 100% 92% 100% 98% 98% 91%

3% 5% 3% 1% 4% 6% 0% 8% - 2% 2% 9%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Do you use marijuana

No

Yes

348 65 87 98 71 169 177 70 51 225 307 39

342 103 75 71 70 168 172 86 43 211 296 44

73% 75% 69% 69% 72% 66% 80% 64% 68% 77% 74% 61%

27% 25% 31% 31% 28% 34% 20% 36% 32% 23% 26% 39%

Page 41

QUESTION 8: OF THE APPROXIMATE 5,000 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ON

CAMPUS DO YOU THINK HAVE A MEDICAL MARIJUANA CARD?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

What percentage ofstudents on campus doyou think have a medicalmarijuana card?

None

1 - 5%

6 - 10%

11 - 15%

16 - 25%

25 - 50%

More than 50%

Mean

Median

435 130 87 92 98 202 230 106 49 276 378 54

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 0% 4%

44% 45% 50% 38% 38% 49% 40% 46% 46% 43% 46% 30%

19% 20% 23% 19% 12% 19% 18% 24% 18% 16% 18% 22%

8% 5% 7% 12% 12% 9% 8% 6% 12% 9% 8% 11%

16% 12% 10% 19% 25% 14% 18% 13% 14% 18% 15% 21%

11% 16% 7% 10% 10% 7% 14% 9% 10% 12% 11% 11%

1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 2%

13.0 13.5 10.9 13.4 14.5 11.8 14.0 11.7 11.7 13.7 12.7 14.5

10.0 7.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 6.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0

Page 42

QUESTION 9: OF THE APPROXIMATE 5,000 STUDENTS ON CAMPUS, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ON

CAMPUS DO YOU THINK USE MARIJUANA?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Please enter percent ofstudents.

None

1 - 10%

11 - 25%

26 - 50%

51 - 75%

More than 75%

Mean

Median

436 132 87 92 97 202 231 105 49 278 379 54

1% 1% - 1% - 0% 1% - - 1% - 4%

9% 7% 13% 6% 7% 10% 8% 11% 5% 9% 9% 7%

15% 13% 12% 13% 14% 20% 11% 11% 9% 17% 16% 6%

35% 32% 34% 36% 41% 32% 37% 36% 28% 35% 35% 32%

26% 31% 18% 31% 25% 25% 27% 20% 37% 26% 26% 22%

15% 14% 24% 14% 12% 12% 18% 22% 20% 12% 13% 28%

48.4 49.9 49.6 50.4 48.4 45.3 51.1 51.0 56.4 46.2 47.6 54.4

50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 65.0 50.0 50.0 55.0

Page 43

SECTION 2: OPINIONS AND EXPERIENCES

QUESTION 10: DO YOU BELIEVE THAT ALCOHOL HAS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING EFFECTS?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Breaks the ice

Yes

No

447 83 101 125 100 202 242 89 57 297 396 48

438 132 87 91 99 200 235 108 48 278 381 54

77% 72% 74% 82% 79% 79% 75% 75% 86% 75% 77% 75%

23% 28% 26% 18% 21% 21% 25% 25% 14% 25% 23% 25%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No


Yes

No

447 84 100 126 100 204 240 88 57 298 396 48

439 133 86 92 99 203 233 107 48 279 381 54

75% 77% 72% 75% 75% 77% 73% 77% 83% 72% 74% 79%

25% 23% 28% 25% 25% 23% 27% 23% 17% 28% 26% 21%

Page 44

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Makes it easier to dealwith stress

Yes

No

442 84 98 124 99 202 237 86 57 295 393 46

435 133 84 91 98 201 230 105 48 277 379 53

48% 52% 38% 48% 54% 47% 48% 48% 48% 47% 46% 58%

52% 48% 62% 52% 46% 53% 52% 52% 52% 53% 54% 42%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Facilitates connectionswith peers

Yes

No

443 83 99 124 99 202 238 85 57 297 394 46

435 132 85 91 98 200 231 104 48 279 380 52

64% 60% 57% 71% 72% 63% 65% 64% 69% 63% 64% 67%

36% 40% 43% 29% 28% 37% 35% 36% 31% 37% 36% 33%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Gives people somethingto talk about

Yes

No

441 83 100 124 98 202 236 86 57 294 392 46

433 132 86 91 97 200 230 104 48 277 378 52

67% 71% 64% 68% 70% 69% 66% 71% 65% 66% 67% 70%

33% 29% 36% 32% 30% 31% 34% 29% 35% 34% 33% 30%

Page 45

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Allows people to havemore fun

Yes

No

444 83 99 125 99 202 239 85 57 298 396 45

435 132 85 91 98 200 232 103 48 279 381 51

61% 66% 65% 58% 58% 59% 63% 73% 65% 56% 60% 71%

39% 34% 35% 42% 42% 41% 37% 27% 35% 44% 40% 29%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Gives me moreconfidence

Yes

No

440 83 98 124 98 201 236 85 57 294 392 45

432 132 84 91 97 199 229 103 48 276 378 51

47% 42% 43% 50% 56% 51% 44% 42% 53% 48% 49% 36%

53% 58% 57% 50% 44% 49% 56% 58% 47% 52% 51% 64%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Makes me lookcool/sophisticated

Yes

No

437 83 99 121 98 198 236 85 56 292 389 45

430 132 85 89 97 198 229 103 47 275 376 51

11% 14% 10% 11% 9% 12% 11% 9% 14% 12% 12% 9%

89% 86% 90% 89% 91% 88% 89% 91% 86% 88% 88% 91%

Page 46

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Makes me moreattractive

Yes

No

437 83 99 121 98 198 236 85 56 292 389 45

430 132 85 89 97 198 229 103 47 275 376 51

11% 12% 12% 10% 7% 14% 8% 12% 12% 10% 10% 13%

89% 88% 88% 90% 93% 86% 92% 88% 88% 90% 90% 87%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Makes other peoplemore attractive

Yes

No

437 83 98 122 98 199 235 85 56 292 389 45

430 132 84 89 97 198 228 103 47 275 376 51

37% 29% 37% 39% 44% 52% 25% 29% 41% 39% 38% 30%

63% 71% 63% 61% 56% 48% 75% 71% 59% 61% 62% 70%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Facilitates sexualactivities

Yes

No

440 82 99 123 98 200 237 84 57 295 392 45

431 130 85 90 97 199 229 102 48 277 377 51

71% 69% 64% 69% 81% 71% 71% 71% 70% 71% 71% 73%

29% 31% 36% 31% 19% 29% 29% 29% 30% 29% 29% 27%

Page 47

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Leads to the use ofmarijuana

Yes

No

437 82 100 121 98 199 235 84 56 293 389 45

429 130 86 89 97 198 228 102 47 276 375 51

34% 38% 31% 38% 30% 29% 40% 37% 23% 36% 35% 34%

66% 62% 69% 62% 70% 71% 60% 63% 77% 64% 65% 66%

Page 48

QUESTION 11: PLEASE INDICATE HOW OFTEN YOU HAVE EXPERIENCED THE FOLLOWING DUE TO YOUR DRINKING

DURING THE PAST YEAR.

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Missed a class

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

450 84 103 125 100 205 242 89 57 300 399 48

442 133 88 91 99 204 235 108 48 281 384 54

81% 96% 69% 72% 74% 77% 84% 86% 66% 81% 81% 78%

7% 4% 12% 9% 5% 6% 8% 4% 16% 7% 7% 4%

5% - 7% 7% 10% 6% 5% 3% 9% 5% 4% 10%

5% - 7% 10% 8% 9% 2% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7%

1% - 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% - 2% 1% -

1% - 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 4% 1% 1% 2%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Had a hangover

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

447 84 103 125 99 204 240 89 57 297 396 48

439 133 88 91 98 203 233 108 48 279 382 54

45% 50% 54% 36% 37% 45% 46% 52% 45% 43% 44% 55%

14% 14% 13% 19% 12% 15% 14% 13% 14% 15% 16% 7%

12% 14% 6% 10% 18% 9% 16% 11% 14% 12% 12% 12%

13% 12% 13% 17% 9% 12% 13% 12% 12% 13% 13% 13%

6% 5% 4% 7% 10% 6% 6% 3% 8% 7% 6% 4%

9% 5% 11% 11% 13% 13% 5% 8% 8% 9% 9% 8%

Page 49

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Driven a car when I'vehad too much alcohol todrink

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

449 84 103 125 99 204 242 89 57 299 398 48

441 133 88 91 98 203 235 108 48 280 383 54

75% 86% 82% 68% 62% 70% 79% 80% 67% 75% 74% 84%

10% 6% 9% 8% 17% 10% 10% 7% 4% 12% 11% 8%

5% 2% 2% 9% 8% 6% 5% 4% 8% 5% 5% 5%

4% - 3% 10% 6% 6% 3% 2% 11% 4% 5% -

2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% -

3% 4% 1% 3% 5% 5% 1% 4% 8% 2% 3% 3%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Did something you laterregretted

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

449 84 103 125 99 204 242 89 57 299 398 48

441 133 88 91 98 203 235 108 48 280 383 54

62% 70% 66% 56% 52% 60% 63% 65% 52% 62% 62% 60%

14% 12% 10% 17% 20% 15% 14% 13% 18% 15% 14% 16%

10% 7% 13% 11% 10% 10% 9% 7% 15% 10% 10% 8%

10% 7% 9% 11% 15% 9% 11% 8% 12% 11% 10% 13%

2% - 1% 4% 2% 2% 1% - 3% 2% 2% 2%

2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 7% - 1% 2% 2%

Page 50

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Been hurt or injured

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

449 84 103 124 100 205 241 89 57 299 398 48

441 133 88 91 99 204 234 108 48 280 383 54

84% 87% 85% 79% 82% 84% 85% 80% 80% 87% 84% 88%

8% 5% 10% 15% 7% 9% 7% 8% 15% 8% 9% 3%

4% 8% 3% 2% 4% 5% 4% 9% 5% 3% 4% 6%

1% - 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 2% - 2% 1% 2%

1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 2%

1% - - 1% 2% - 1% - - 1% 1% -

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Had memory loss

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

449 84 103 124 100 205 241 89 57 299 398 48

441 133 88 91 99 204 234 108 48 280 383 54

65% 69% 67% 56% 62% 64% 67% 67% 51% 68% 66% 61%

13% 14% 13% 16% 11% 12% 13% 12% 26% 11% 12% 19%

10% 8% 11% 15% 10% 11% 10% 10% 16% 10% 11% 6%

5% 5% 3% 7% 8% 6% 5% 4% 5% 6% 5% 7%

2% - 2% 1% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%

4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% 3% 6% - 4% 4% 6%

Page 51

QUESTION 12: PLEASE INDICATE HOW OFTEN YOU THINK THE AVERAGE STUDENT AT CSU-PUEBLO HAS

EXPERIENCED THE FOLLOWING DUE TO THEIR DRINKING DURING THE PAST YEAR.

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Missed a class

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

446 83 102 125 98 205 239 88 58 297 396 48

437 132 88 91 97 203 231 106 49 278 380 54

4% 4% 2% 6% 4% 8% 0% 6% 6% 3% 4% 4%

6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 6% 6% 7% 2% 6% 5% 7%

19% 19% 24% 19% 14% 21% 18% 19% 23% 19% 20% 17%

45% 39% 52% 47% 45% 44% 44% 34% 47% 48% 46% 36%

16% 25% 11% 11% 11% 15% 16% 28% 6% 13% 14% 29%

11% 7% 6% 12% 22% 6% 15% 6% 16% 12% 12% 7%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Had a hangover

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

446 83 102 125 98 205 239 88 58 297 396 48

437 132 88 91 97 203 231 106 49 278 380 54

2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 4% - 3% - 2% 2% 3%

4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4%

8% 7% 12% 6% 7% 8% 7% 9% 8% 7% 8% 8%

27% 28% 32% 23% 25% 30% 24% 20% 31% 29% 28% 21%

21% 19% 18% 24% 23% 22% 20% 25% 19% 20% 20% 26%

39% 40% 36% 43% 39% 31% 46% 41% 39% 38% 39% 38%

Page 52

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Driven a car when I'vehad too much alcohol todrink

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

445 82 102 125 98 205 238 87 58 297 395 48

436 130 88 91 97 203 230 105 49 278 379 54

4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 7% 2% 8% 2% 3% 4% 7%

12% 17% 15% 6% 8% 16% 9% 18% 10% 10% 13% 7%

19% 22% 21% 16% 16% 19% 18% 16% 18% 19% 17% 26%

37% 30% 34% 40% 45% 35% 38% 33% 36% 38% 38% 30%

14% 12% 16% 19% 12% 12% 17% 13% 23% 14% 14% 19%

14% 13% 11% 16% 13% 10% 17% 11% 10% 15% 14% 10%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Did something they laterregretted

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

446 83 102 125 98 205 239 88 58 297 396 48

437 132 88 91 97 203 231 106 49 278 380 54

3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 6% - 6% 1% 2% 3% 4%

7% 6% 5% 8% 5% 7% 6% 5% 7% 7% 8% -

15% 16% 20% 11% 12% 18% 12% 15% 16% 14% 13% 23%

29% 23% 33% 31% 32% 31% 28% 21% 38% 31% 30% 22%

19% 17% 15% 17% 29% 17% 22% 18% 21% 20% 20% 14%

27% 35% 24% 29% 19% 21% 32% 34% 17% 26% 26% 37%

Page 53

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Been hurt or injured

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

445 83 102 125 98 205 238 88 58 296 395 48

437 132 88 91 97 203 231 106 49 278 380 54

7% 4% 5% 6% 10% 11% 3% 5% 8% 6% 7% 3%

19% 19% 23% 14% 15% 22% 15% 13% 13% 22% 19% 13%

25% 23% 28% 24% 28% 25% 25% 22% 35% 25% 23% 37%

30% 28% 26% 36% 33% 27% 33% 30% 24% 31% 31% 25%

12% 17% 13% 11% 6% 9% 15% 22% 9% 9% 11% 16%

8% 10% 5% 9% 7% 7% 9% 7% 10% 8% 8% 6%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Had memory loss

Never

Once

Twice

3-5 Times

6-9 Times

10 Or More Times

446 83 102 125 98 205 239 88 58 297 396 48

437 132 88 91 97 203 231 106 49 278 380 54

7% 7% 5% 6% 7% 10% 4% 5% 5% 7% 7% 4%

11% 12% 11% 10% 10% 11% 12% 10% 7% 13% 12% 5%

15% 11% 25% 12% 9% 15% 14% 11% 16% 16% 16% 8%

30% 24% 28% 33% 36% 29% 30% 23% 38% 31% 29% 31%

17% 18% 15% 15% 21% 19% 15% 21% 8% 17% 16% 24%

21% 28% 16% 23% 16% 16% 25% 30% 26% 16% 20% 28%

Page 54

SECTION 3: IMPAIRED DRIVING

QUESTION 13: HAVE YOU EVER DRIVEN A VEHICLE AFTER YOU’VE HAVE TOO MUCH ALCOHOL TO DRINK?

(IF YES) IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Have you ever driven avehicle after you've hadtoo much ...

Yes

No

452 84 103 127 100 206 243 89 58 301 401 48

443 133 88 93 99 204 235 108 49 282 385 54

39% 22% 26% 46% 61% 43% 36% 21% 35% 47% 42% 20%

61% 78% 74% 54% 39% 57% 64% 79% 65% 53% 58% 80%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

In the last 12 months?

Yes

No

208 22 34 63 63 104 103 25 23 159 193 14

193 35 29 46 62 100 92 29 20 143 175 17

46% 50% 47% 52% 51% 47% 46% 58% 55% 43% 48% 34%

54% 50% 53% 48% 49% 53% 54% 42% 45% 57% 52% 66%

Page 55

QUESTION 14: IN THE PAST YEAR, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CSU-PUEBLO STUDENTS DO YOU THINK HAVE DRIVEN

AFTER THEY HAVE HAD TOO MUCH ALCOHOL TO DRINK?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Please enter percent ofstudents.

None

1 - 10%

11 - 25%

26 - 50%

51 - 75%

More than 75%

Mean

Median

437 132 88 91 97 203 232 106 48 280 380 54

1% 1% - 1% - 0% 1% 1% - 0% - 4%

22% 22% 26% 16% 22% 29% 15% 25% 19% 20% 23% 14%

25% 26% 21% 25% 21% 24% 26% 24% 19% 26% 26% 13%

31% 29% 30% 33% 39% 30% 33% 24% 43% 32% 30% 44%

16% 16% 13% 21% 14% 14% 18% 15% 17% 17% 16% 19%

6% 6% 10% 5% 3% 4% 8% 10% 2% 5% 6% 6%

35.0 33.5 35.4 38.1 34.7 31.1 38.4 33.7 36.1 35.4 34.3 39.9

30.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 45.0

Page 56

QUESTION 15: HOW OFTEN DO YOU THINK STUDENTS ON YOUR CAMPUS DESIGNATE A SOBER DRIVER WHEN

THEY DRINK ALCOHOL?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

How often do you thinkstudents on yourcampus designate ...

Never/Almost Never

Rarely

Frequently

Always/Almost Always

445 83 102 125 98 204 239 88 57 297 395 48

436 132 87 91 97 203 231 106 48 278 379 54

21% 23% 20% 17% 21% 23% 19% 25% 19% 20% 20% 26%

37% 37% 33% 37% 42% 31% 43% 34% 23% 41% 37% 38%

37% 36% 40% 42% 31% 42% 32% 33% 54% 35% 37% 35%

5% 4% 7% 4% 6% 4% 5% 8% 3% 4% 5% 1%

Page 57

QUESTION 16: HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK A DUI WOULD COST, IF YOU ADDED UP ALL OF THE ASSOCIATED

EXPENSES?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Please enter a dollar ($)amount.

$0 to $999

$1,000 to $2,499

$2,500 to $4,999

$5,000 to $7,499

$7,500 to $9,999

$10,000 to $12,499

$12,500 or higher

Mean

Median

427 128 88 86 97 198 227 105 47 272 370 54

31% 44% 36% 27% 19% 26% 35% 51% 43% 21% 28% 52%

18% 22% 23% 9% 14% 18% 17% 21% 11% 18% 17% 21%

7% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6%

11% 11% 9% 12% 12% 10% 11% 11% 15% 10% 11% 9%

2% - 1% 5% 1% 3% 1% - 1% 3% 3% -

24% 12% 22% 31% 36% 29% 21% 10% 17% 31% 26% 13%

7% 5% 4% 10% 10% 7% 7% - 6% 10% 8% -

5053 3287 4007 6463 6867 5485 4698 2369 4385 6199 5449 2446

3000 1000 1200 5000 7000 4000 2000 900 1800 5000 3000 900

Page 58

QUESTION 17: THE LAST TIME YOU WENT OUT, DID YOU DO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING BEFORE YOU HAD YOUR

FIRST DRINK?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Selected a designateddriver

Yes

No

371 65 84 108 83 169 199 68 54 245 328 40

361 103 72 79 82 166 191 82 46 228 312 46

68% 71% 74% 72% 59% 60% 76% 71% 62% 68% 66% 85%

32% 29% 26% 28% 41% 40% 24% 29% 38% 32% 34% 15%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Arranged to have afriend available to comepick you up, just in case

Yes

No

362 65 84 101 82 163 196 67 52 240 319 40

354 103 72 74 81 162 188 81 44 225 305 46

47% 49% 51% 46% 49% 43% 50% 43% 34% 51% 47% 46%

53% 51% 49% 54% 51% 57% 50% 57% 66% 49% 53% 54%

Page 59

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Arranged to sleepsomewhere else so youwouldn’t have to drivehome

Yes

No

364 66 83 101 82 164 197 66 53 242 321 40

356 105 71 74 81 164 189 81 45 227 307 46

63% 68% 63% 71% 58% 63% 65% 66% 57% 64% 64% 64%

37% 32% 37% 29% 42% 37% 35% 34% 43% 36% 36% 36%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Made sure you had thenumber for alternativetransportation

Yes

No

358 63 84 101 80 162 193 65 53 237 315 40

349 100 72 74 79 160 185 78 45 222 300 46

47% 41% 52% 50% 47% 45% 49% 45% 39% 50% 46% 58%

53% 59% 48% 50% 53% 55% 51% 55% 61% 50% 54% 42%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Chose a location thatwas close so you couldwalk home

Yes

No

364 66 84 102 82 165 196 67 54 240 321 40

356 105 72 75 81 165 188 81 46 226 307 46

42% 46% 45% 45% 40% 51% 35% 54% 60% 35% 41% 53%

58% 54% 55% 55% 60% 49% 65% 46% 40% 65% 59% 47%

Page 60

QUESTION 18: IN THE PAST YEAR (12 MONTHS), HAVE YOU DONE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING TO KEEP FROM

DRIVING AFTER YOU BEGAN DRINKING?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Left your car overnightand found another wayhome

Yes

No

365 67 83 102 82 168 195 67 53 242 326 37

358 106 71 75 81 168 187 83 45 227 313 42

57% 54% 56% 64% 61% 60% 55% 51% 65% 58% 59% 47%

43% 46% 44% 36% 39% 40% 45% 49% 35% 42% 41% 53%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Designated a soberdriver

Yes

No

371 67 84 105 84 170 199 69 54 245 331 38

363 106 72 77 83 169 191 84 46 229 317 43

78% 76% 82% 81% 77% 75% 80% 78% 86% 76% 76% 90%

22% 24% 18% 19% 23% 25% 20% 22% 14% 24% 24% 10%

Page 61

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Called a cab

Yes

No

358 65 82 99 81 162 194 66 52 237 319 37

351 103 70 72 80 162 186 82 44 221 306 42

24% 15% 16% 29% 34% 26% 23% 14% 21% 29% 24% 26%

76% 85% 84% 71% 66% 74% 77% 86% 79% 71% 76% 74%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Used publictransportation

Yes

No

354 65 82 99 79 162 190 66 52 233 315 37

347 103 70 72 78 162 183 82 44 217 302 42

17% 15% 17% 14% 20% 22% 12% 13% 17% 18% 16% 22%

83% 85% 83% 86% 80% 78% 88% 87% 83% 82% 84% 78%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Called to have a friendor relative come pickyou up

Yes

No

363 67 82 102 82 167 194 68 51 241 323 38

356 106 70 75 81 167 186 84 44 225 310 43

67% 67% 71% 74% 66% 69% 65% 74% 71% 64% 64% 87%

33% 33% 29% 26% 34% 31% 35% 26% 29% 36% 36% 13%

Page 62

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Walked home

Yes

No

367 66 83 106 83 169 196 69 54 241 327 38

358 105 71 77 82 167 188 84 46 224 313 43

52% 52% 58% 52% 54% 64% 42% 61% 65% 47% 49% 77%

48% 48% 42% 48% 46% 36% 58% 39% 35% 53% 51% 23%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Spent the nightsomewhere besideshome

Yes

No

366 67 83 105 81 170 194 67 54 242 327 37

358 106 71 77 80 169 186 83 46 226 313 42

81% 87% 84% 88% 74% 85% 77% 90% 86% 76% 80% 89%

19% 13% 16% 12% 26% 15% 23% 10% 14% 24% 20% 11%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Asked someone else todrive your car home foryou

Yes

No

362 67 83 102 81 168 192 67 53 239 323 37

355 106 71 75 80 168 185 83 45 224 311 42

52% 51% 54% 63% 50% 56% 49% 47% 60% 53% 51% 59%

48% 49% 46% 37% 50% 44% 51% 53% 40% 47% 49% 41%

Page 63

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Asked a non-drinkingperson for a ride whowasn't your designateddriver.

Yes

No

356 65 83 99 80 163 191 67 52 234 317 37

349 103 71 72 79 163 184 83 44 218 304 42

46% 43% 54% 49% 42% 52% 41% 43% 52% 46% 46% 49%

54% 57% 46% 51% 58% 48% 59% 57% 48% 54% 54% 51%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Rode a bike

Yes

No

350 64 81 96 80 157 191 65 52 230 312 36

344 101 69 71 79 158 184 80 45 216 301 41

8% 8% 4% 7% 13% 14% 3% 13% 4% 7% 8% 11%

92% 92% 96% 93% 87% 86% 97% 87% 96% 93% 92% 89%

Page 64

QUESTION 19: DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS, HAVE YOU DONE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING TO PREVENT A PERSON

WHO WAS DRINKING FROM DRIVING?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Advised someone whoyou thought had toomuch to drink that theycould not drive safely

Yes

No

446 83 103 123 100 205 239 88 58 297 396 48

437 132 88 90 99 204 231 106 49 279 380 54

82% 86% 80% 90% 81% 79% 85% 82% 93% 81% 81% 93%

18% 14% 20% 10% 19% 21% 15% 18% 7% 19% 19% 7%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Hidden someone’s keys

Yes

No

438 83 102 118 98 201 235 88 56 291 388 48

431 132 87 86 97 201 227 106 48 274 374 54

48% 58% 52% 47% 40% 47% 48% 53% 44% 46% 46% 57%

52% 42% 48% 53% 60% 53% 52% 47% 56% 54% 54% 43%

Page 65

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Taken someone’s keyfrom them

Yes

No

440 83 102 118 100 200 238 88 57 292 390 48

433 132 87 87 99 200 230 106 48 275 376 54

60% 70% 61% 60% 55% 58% 61% 67% 53% 59% 58% 71%

40% 30% 39% 40% 45% 42% 39% 33% 47% 41% 42% 29%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Restrained someonefrom getting into theircar

Yes

No

437 82 102 117 99 199 236 88 56 290 387 48

430 130 87 86 98 199 228 106 48 272 373 54

32% 35% 38% 39% 22% 32% 32% 40% 42% 28% 30% 50%

68% 65% 62% 61% 78% 68% 68% 60% 58% 72% 70% 50%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Asked another person tooffer the intoxicatedperson a ride home

Yes

No

442 83 103 119 100 202 238 88 56 295 392 48

435 132 88 87 99 202 230 106 48 277 378 54

65% 66% 65% 68% 67% 63% 66% 69% 73% 62% 63% 80%

35% 34% 35% 32% 33% 37% 34% 31% 27% 38% 37% 20%

Page 66

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Taken someone homewith you to “sleep it off”

Yes

No

441 83 103 119 99 202 237 88 57 293 391 48

434 132 88 87 98 202 229 106 48 275 377 54

45% 46% 50% 46% 47% 46% 45% 52% 59% 41% 44% 57%

55% 54% 50% 54% 53% 54% 55% 48% 41% 59% 56% 43%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Offered to drivesomeone to their homewhen you weren’tplanning to

Yes

No

442 83 103 119 100 202 238 88 57 294 392 48

435 132 88 87 99 202 230 106 48 277 378 54

71% 72% 66% 77% 77% 67% 73% 71% 82% 68% 70% 72%

29% 28% 34% 23% 23% 33% 27% 29% 18% 32% 30% 28%

Page 67

QUESTION 20: WHAT IMPACT DOES MARIJUANA USE HAVE ON ONE'S ABILITY TO SAFELY DRIVE?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

What impact doesmarijuana have on one'sability to safel...

Significant negativeimpact

Slight negative impact

No impact

Slight positive impact

Significant positiveimpact

448 84 103 125 100 206 240 88 58 299 399 47

439 133 88 91 99 204 233 107 49 280 384 53

37% 36% 40% 31% 36% 36% 39% 34% 29% 40% 39% 29%

35% 36% 32% 39% 36% 34% 35% 36% 37% 34% 33% 47%

15% 12% 19% 20% 14% 19% 12% 18% 22% 13% 15% 15%

6% 6% 6% 4% 8% 7% 5% 5% 7% 6% 5% 8%

7% 11% 3% 6% 6% 5% 9% 7% 5% 7% 8% 2%

Page 68

QUESTION 21: WHEN THINKING ABOUT THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF DRINKING AND DRIVING COMPARED

TO USING MARIJUANA AND DRIVING, PLEASE RATE THE FOLLOWING CONSEQUENCES FOR USING MARIJUANA

AND DRIVING COMPARED TO DRINKING AND DRIVING:

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Total cost associatedwith getting caught

More than alcohol

About the same

Less than alcohol

446 82 103 124 100 205 239 87 58 298 397 47

437 130 88 91 99 204 230 105 49 279 380 54

25% 29% 27% 28% 21% 23% 27% 32% 28% 22% 25% 27%

38% 39% 36% 34% 35% 38% 39% 27% 35% 43% 39% 37%

37% 32% 37% 38% 44% 39% 34% 40% 37% 35% 37% 36%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Legal penalties

More than alcohol

About the same

Less than alcohol

446 82 103 124 100 205 239 87 58 298 397 47

437 130 88 91 99 204 230 105 49 279 380 54

32% 35% 36% 33% 28% 27% 36% 33% 36% 31% 32% 28%

40% 38% 38% 39% 39% 42% 39% 37% 33% 43% 39% 46%

28% 27% 26% 28% 33% 31% 26% 30% 31% 27% 28% 26%

Page 69

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Chance for severe injuryor death

More than alcohol

About the same

Less than alcohol

446 82 103 124 100 205 239 87 58 298 397 47

437 130 88 91 99 204 230 105 49 279 380 54

9% 13% 8% 12% 2% 6% 11% 15% 11% 6% 8% 15%

43% 40% 40% 41% 46% 41% 46% 32% 36% 49% 45% 37%

48% 46% 53% 47% 52% 53% 43% 52% 52% 45% 47% 48%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Chance for minor injury

More than alcohol

About the same

Less than alcohol

445 82 103 123 100 204 239 87 58 297 396 47

436 130 88 90 99 203 230 105 49 279 380 54

9% 12% 11% 12% 4% 9% 10% 14% 11% 7% 8% 19%

53% 55% 45% 48% 54% 49% 56% 47% 36% 58% 54% 47%

38% 33% 44% 40% 42% 42% 34% 39% 53% 34% 38% 34%

Page 70

SECTION 4: CAMPAIGN MESSAGES

QUESTION 22: IN THE PAST YEAR, HOW FREQUENTLY HAVE YOU SEEN OR HEARD

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Ads in barsdiscouraging drinkingand driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

445 84 103 124 97 204 239 89 57 296 395 48

437 133 88 91 96 202 232 108 48 277 380 54

27% 32% 26% 23% 24% 22% 31% 24% 22% 29% 27% 29%

15% 13% 15% 16% 16% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 14% 20%

23% 17% 26% 24% 27% 25% 22% 21% 30% 22% 23% 24%

23% 26% 19% 26% 22% 24% 22% 23% 18% 24% 25% 10%

12% 12% 14% 11% 12% 14% 10% 17% 14% 9% 11% 17%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Posters on campusdiscouraging drinkingand driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

446 84 103 125 98 204 240 89 58 296 396 48

438 133 88 91 97 202 233 108 49 278 381 54

12% 11% 11% 10% 16% 12% 12% 8% 5% 15% 12% 12%

19% 17% 16% 19% 20% 22% 17% 13% 20% 21% 20% 11%

31% 27% 29% 35% 34% 32% 30% 31% 38% 29% 32% 23%

24% 26% 28% 23% 23% 21% 28% 25% 20% 25% 24% 31%

14% 19% 17% 13% 6% 14% 14% 24% 17% 9% 12% 23%

Page 71

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Radio ads discouragingdrinking and driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

446 84 103 125 97 203 241 89 58 296 396 48

438 133 88 91 96 201 234 108 49 277 381 54

10% 18% 6% 5% 7% 9% 10% 15% 3% 9% 9% 14%

12% 13% 12% 13% 11% 11% 13% 7% 6% 15% 13% 8%

35% 25% 36% 37% 38% 34% 35% 30% 46% 35% 35% 37%

30% 31% 27% 32% 33% 34% 27% 33% 30% 29% 30% 28%

14% 13% 19% 13% 10% 12% 14% 15% 16% 12% 13% 14%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

A website discouragingdrinking and driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

446 84 103 125 98 204 240 89 58 296 396 48

438 133 88 91 97 202 233 108 49 278 381 54

15% 11% 14% 15% 22% 14% 17% 8% 11% 19% 16% 7%

23% 23% 16% 23% 28% 22% 23% 17% 22% 25% 24% 12%

32% 36% 31% 38% 20% 31% 33% 38% 32% 30% 30% 46%

21% 22% 24% 14% 24% 23% 19% 22% 26% 19% 20% 23%

10% 10% 16% 10% 6% 11% 9% 15% 9% 8% 9% 12%

Page 72

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

A social media site suchas Facebook, MySpace,or Twitter discouragingdrinking and driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

444 83 103 124 98 204 238 88 57 296 394 48

436 132 88 91 97 202 231 106 48 278 379 54

25% 20% 24% 23% 27% 26% 25% 17% 17% 30% 26% 19%

29% 26% 24% 31% 40% 27% 32% 20% 36% 31% 30% 21%

27% 31% 31% 27% 18% 29% 25% 38% 29% 22% 25% 37%

10% 13% 11% 11% 8% 10% 11% 13% 5% 11% 10% 12%

8% 8% 10% 9% 7% 8% 8% 11% 12% 6% 7% 12%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Information about datacollected from yourschool regardingdrinking behaviors

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

446 84 103 125 98 204 240 89 58 296 396 48

438 133 88 91 97 202 233 108 49 278 381 54

23% 13% 27% 17% 30% 22% 23% 12% 18% 28% 23% 19%

25% 13% 23% 35% 33% 24% 26% 16% 39% 26% 27% 13%

26% 32% 20% 31% 23% 25% 27% 28% 26% 26% 25% 34%

18% 31% 21% 11% 7% 21% 16% 32% 10% 14% 18% 22%

8% 11% 10% 5% 7% 8% 8% 13% 7% 6% 7% 12%

Page 73

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Educational informationabout the effects ofmarijuana and driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

445 83 103 125 98 204 239 88 58 296 396 47

436 132 88 91 97 202 231 106 49 278 381 53

31% 23% 28% 32% 36% 32% 30% 20% 37% 34% 33% 19%

26% 22% 21% 30% 33% 26% 25% 29% 24% 24% 25% 28%

22% 22% 31% 25% 14% 21% 23% 20% 23% 23% 21% 29%

15% 26% 12% 9% 10% 14% 17% 20% 10% 14% 15% 17%

6% 7% 8% 4% 7% 7% 6% 11% 7% 4% 6% 8%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Ads in other locationsdiscouraging drinkingand driving

Never/Almost Never

Hardly Ever

Sometimes

Frequently

Very Frequently

361 66 76 106 83 171 188 66 42 250 321 38

354 105 65 78 82 172 180 79 36 235 308 43

22% 26% 24% 17% 20% 22% 21% 24% 25% 21% 22% 18%

16% 15% 14% 19% 13% 16% 17% 17% 24% 15% 16% 21%

32% 29% 28% 35% 37% 33% 32% 30% 29% 33% 33% 30%

21% 20% 24% 21% 22% 20% 22% 14% 11% 25% 21% 18%

9% 11% 11% 7% 7% 9% 8% 14% 11% 6% 8% 13%

Page 74

Other Locations allover town

around town

bathroom

bathrooms

bill boards

billboard signs

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards

billboards, benches, bus stops

billboards, signs

billboards, tv

billboards, tv commercials

billboards/commercials

bumper stickers

bus

bus benches/cabs

commercials

commercials

commercials

commercials

convience store

court house

dmv

dmv

everywhere

fast food, convience stores

gas stations

health services

hich schools

highway

highway

highway

home tv (alcohol ads "please drink

responsibly")

library, stores

liquor store

liquor stores

magazines

magazines/tv

mobile apps

newspapers, billboards

newspapers, billboards

on a city bus - nm?

on highway

outdoor

outdoor advertisements

pandora online radio

probation office

public postings

public transportation

Pueblo

Pueblo Chieftan, e-mail

radio

random hang-ups

restaurants

restraunts

schools

schools, places of business

state patrol sign on major roadways

stores

stores, billboards

television commercials

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv

tv ads

tv bus ads

tv commercials

word of mouth

Page 75

QUESTION 23: WHERE DO YOU GET EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING ALCOHOL

Other church

classes

experience

experience

experience/family

high school health class

I don't worry about it

I was a police officer

job training

kappa sigma

military

myself

myself

no where

personal experience

personal research

self, daughter

slef education

spouse

tv

tv

word of mouth

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Where do you get yourinformation regardingalcohol? Ple...

School faculty

School staff

Your friends

Posters

Campus electronicmessage boards

The HOWL

Advertising: Radio, TV,print publications

Social media

Online websites

Counseling center

RAs


Parents

Other

438 83 102 122 97 200 236 89 57 289 388 48

431 132 88 89 96 199 230 108 48 272 374 54

38% 48% 41% 34% 30% 42% 34% 49% 33% 34% 36% 50%

32% 41% 31% 30% 26% 34% 30% 43% 33% 27% 29% 49%

58% 68% 64% 58% 49% 59% 57% 67% 55% 55% 55% 79%

50% 52% 63% 53% 41% 48% 53% 58% 55% 46% 47% 70%

17% 22% 20% 16% 10% 17% 17% 27% 17% 13% 15% 29%

10% 15% 9% 11% 6% 13% 7% 16% 10% 8% 10% 12%

47% 38% 52% 54% 45% 44% 48% 40% 39% 50% 46% 46%

48% 58% 45% 46% 42% 46% 50% 54% 41% 47% 46% 61%

38% 42% 41% 37% 36% 36% 40% 48% 30% 36% 35% 59%

20% 27% 21% 21% 13% 21% 20% 27% 16% 19% 20% 24%

17% 24% 19% 14% 14% 17% 18% 36% 25% 9% 15% 33%

50% 47% 51% 44% 59% 45% 55% 52% 49% 50% 50% 53%

64% 78% 66% 57% 62% 64% 64% 78% 58% 59% 63% 72%

6% 2% 3% 6% 13% 8% 5% 3% 5% 7% 6% 4%

Page 76

QUESTION 24: HOW BELIEVABLE ARE EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCES OF INFORMATION REGARDING

ALCOHOL?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

School faculty

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable

Somewhat Unbelievable

Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

444 82 103 124 100 205 237 87 57 297 394 48

436 130 88 91 99 204 229 105 48 279 379 54

41% 49% 38% 35% 33% 42% 39% 43% 30% 42% 40% 46%

39% 31% 43% 44% 45% 34% 45% 41% 49% 37% 39% 45%

8% 10% 9% 6% 10% 12% 5% 12% 12% 7% 9% 3%

3% 1% 5% 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 4% 3% 3% 2%

9% 9% 6% 12% 10% 9% 8% 4% 5% 11% 9% 4%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

School staff

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

441 81 102 123 100 203 236 86 56 296 391 48

432 128 87 90 99 201 228 103 48 278 375 54

37% 45% 37% 34% 27% 37% 37% 40% 33% 36% 36% 46%

42% 37% 41% 45% 44% 36% 46% 44% 47% 39% 41% 43%

11% 10% 10% 9% 16% 14% 7% 10% 13% 11% 12% 3%

3% 3% 6% 2% 4% 4% 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% 3%

8% 6% 6% 11% 9% 9% 6% 2% 3% 10% 8% 4%

Page 77

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Your friends

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

444 82 102 124 100 204 238 87 57 297 394 48

435 130 87 91 99 203 230 105 48 279 378 54

17% 15% 18% 23% 16% 20% 15% 20% 19% 16% 18% 16%

40% 38% 34% 43% 43% 39% 41% 35% 44% 41% 39% 46%

28% 38% 27% 24% 20% 26% 29% 35% 29% 25% 28% 25%

9% 4% 15% 6% 12% 8% 9% 2% 6% 11% 9% 3%

6% 6% 6% 3% 9% 7% 6% 8% 3% 6% 6% 10%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Posters

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

442 82 102 124 99 203 237 87 57 295 392 48

434 130 87 91 98 202 229 105 48 277 377 54

20% 21% 18% 25% 14% 16% 23% 23% 12% 20% 19% 26%

49% 49% 48% 47% 54% 45% 53% 42% 54% 51% 49% 51%

18% 16% 25% 18% 17% 23% 14% 20% 28% 16% 19% 12%

4% 7% 1% 2% 3% 5% 3% 6% 2% 3% 4% -

9% 7% 8% 8% 12% 11% 7% 9% 5% 10% 9% 10%

Page 78

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

The HOWL

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

425 78 100 119 94 198 225 82 56 284 381 42

416 124 86 87 93 197 217 98 47 267 367 46

14% 12% 17% 21% 6% 10% 16% 18% 19% 11% 13% 18%

38% 36% 35% 36% 46% 37% 40% 30% 34% 42% 38% 40%

16% 18% 20% 18% 9% 21% 12% 22% 17% 14% 17% 11%

3% 4% 2% - 6% 5% 2% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2%

29% 31% 26% 26% 32% 27% 31% 26% 26% 31% 29% 28%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Advertising: Radio, TV,print publications

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

438 81 102 122 99 202 234 86 57 292 389 47

430 128 87 89 98 201 226 103 48 275 375 53

22% 18% 19% 28% 23% 16% 27% 24% 22% 21% 20% 30%

50% 47% 47% 48% 56% 51% 50% 37% 53% 55% 52% 42%

15% 21% 17% 15% 10% 18% 13% 27% 12% 12% 15% 21%

5% 7% 5% 4% 6% 7% 4% 5% 9% 5% 6% 5%

7% 6% 12% 5% 5% 9% 6% 7% 5% 7% 8% 3%

Page 79

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Social media

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

439 82 103 122 98 203 234 87 57 292 389 48

432 130 88 89 97 202 227 105 48 275 375 54

16% 16% 15% 22% 13% 12% 20% 18% 17% 15% 15% 24%

43% 40% 45% 47% 39% 44% 42% 29% 55% 46% 43% 45%

24% 29% 25% 18% 24% 26% 23% 38% 15% 21% 25% 17%

8% 9% 4% 5% 12% 8% 8% 9% 9% 7% 8% 9%

9% 6% 11% 8% 11% 10% 8% 6% 3% 11% 10% 5%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Online websites

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

436 81 102 121 98 202 232 85 57 291 387 47

429 128 88 89 97 202 225 102 48 274 372 54

20% 20% 21% 22% 18% 16% 23% 25% 15% 19% 18% 30%

43% 37% 46% 47% 45% 41% 46% 29% 60% 46% 44% 43%

23% 31% 19% 19% 19% 26% 20% 33% 20% 20% 23% 21%

5% 6% 4% 4% 8% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 6% 2%

8% 6% 10% 7% 9% 10% 6% 8% - 10% 9% 5%

Page 80

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

School newspaper

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

438 82 101 123 98 202 234 87 57 291 388 48

430 130 87 90 97 201 227 105 48 274 374 54

24% 29% 20% 26% 15% 19% 27% 27% 17% 23% 22% 29%

42% 36% 44% 42% 50% 39% 44% 31% 49% 44% 42% 44%

17% 21% 14% 18% 12% 19% 15% 27% 15% 14% 18% 11%

4% 2% 4% 4% 6% 6% 2% 2% 6% 4% 4% 2%

14% 11% 17% 11% 16% 17% 12% 13% 13% 15% 14% 15%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Counseling center

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

437 82 101 122 98 202 233 86 56 292 387 48

430 130 87 89 97 201 226 104 48 275 373 54

47% 48% 39% 45% 52% 44% 49% 48% 40% 48% 47% 46%

32% 32% 36% 34% 30% 29% 36% 27% 37% 34% 32% 34%

8% 11% 10% 6% 6% 12% 5% 16% 6% 6% 9% 6%

3% 1% 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 1% 7% 2% 2% 3%

10% 9% 11% 12% 8% 12% 8% 8% 8% 11% 10% 10%

Page 81

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

RAs

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

434 80 102 122 96 202 230 86 57 288 386 46

425 127 87 89 95 201 222 103 48 270 372 51

24% 28% 29% 17% 20% 22% 26% 28% 29% 22% 22% 39%

34% 34% 31% 38% 38% 34% 34% 30% 40% 34% 34% 34%

18% 21% 21% 14% 15% 22% 16% 28% 19% 15% 19% 13%

5% 3% 6% 8% 7% 6% 5% 3% 6% 6% 5% 3%

18% 15% 14% 22% 19% 17% 19% 12% 6% 23% 19% 11%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No


Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

440 81 102 123 98 202 237 86 57 295 392 47

431 128 87 90 97 200 229 103 48 277 377 53

69% 65% 73% 66% 75% 61% 76% 62% 67% 72% 70% 65%

17% 17% 14% 21% 14% 17% 17% 19% 22% 15% 16% 21%

5% 5% 6% 4% 4% 9% 2% 9% 6% 3% 4% 10%

3% 3% 3% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% -

6% 10% 4% 7% 3% 9% 4% 7% 2% 6% 6% 5%

Page 82

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Parents

Very Believable

Somewhat Believable


Very Unbelievable

Don't Know

441 83 103 123 98 204 235 88 57 293 391 48

434 132 88 90 97 203 228 106 48 276 377 54

51% 54% 53% 51% 52% 47% 55% 54% 49% 50% 50% 57%

30% 25% 31% 32% 30% 27% 33% 23% 35% 32% 31% 25%

10% 11% 7% 9% 12% 15% 6% 14% 11% 8% 10% 9%

3% 4% 3% 1% 3% 4% 1% 3% - 3% 3% -

6% 6% 6% 8% 3% 8% 5% 6% 4% 7% 6% 9%

Page 83

SECTION 5: RESPONDENT DEMOGRAPHICS

QUESTION 25: WHAT IS YOUR CURRENT YEAR IN SCHOOL?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

What is your currentyear in school?

Freshman

Sophomore

Junior

Senior

Graduate

Not seeking a degree

Other

448 84 103 127 100 205 240 88 58 298 398 47

439 133 88 93 99 203 232 107 49 279 382 53

30% 100% - - - 33% 28% 65% 6% 21% 27% 53%

20% - 100% - - 21% 20% 22% 38% 16% 20% 25%

21% - - 100% - 20% 22% 8% 39% 23% 23% 8%

23% - - - 100% 21% 24% 4% 16% 31% 24% 13%

5% - - - - 4% 7% - - 8% 6% -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

0% - - - - 1% 0% - - 1% 1% -

Page 84

QUESTION 26: WHAT IS YOUR AGE?

QUESTION 27: WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?

Total

Base

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Age

18 or younger

19

20

21

22 or older

Mean

440 132 88 92 98 205 235 108 50 281 386 54

21% 66% 4% - - 22% 19% 57% 2% 10% 17% 45%

19% 23% 49% 4% 3% 19% 19% 23% 29% 15% 18% 25%

15% 1% 20% 44% 3% 14% 15% 9% 28% 14% 15% 12%

14% 4% 13% 21% 29% 13% 16% 5% 21% 17% 16% 7%

32% 6% 15% 31% 65% 33% 31% 5% 20% 44% 34% 12%

22.6 19.1 20.6 23.0 24.5 22.2 22.9 18.8 20.6 24.4 23.0 19.6

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

What is your gender?

Male

Female

450 83 103 126 99 207 243 89 59 301 402 48

441 132 88 92 98 205 235 108 50 282 386 54

47% 51% 48% 44% 44% 100% - 50% 45% 46% 47% 42%

53% 49% 52% 56% 56% - 100% 50% 55% 54% 53% 58%

Page 85

QUESTION 28: WHERE IS YOUR CURRENT RESIDENCE AS A STUDENT?

QUESTION 29: DO YOU HAVE REGULAR ACCESS TO A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE YOU ARE AT CSU-PUEBLO?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Where is your currentresidence as a student?

On-campus residencehalls

Apartments on campusor apartments adjacent

to campus

Off-campus

449 83 103 126 98 207 242 89 59 301 401 48

440 132 88 92 97 205 234 108 50 282 385 54

25% 53% 27% 10% 4% 26% 23% 100% - - 18% 71%

11% 2% 21% 21% 8% 11% 12% - 100% - 12% 6%

64% 45% 52% 69% 88% 63% 65% - - 100% 70% 23%

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Do you have regularaccess to a motorvehicle while you a...

Yes

No

450 83 103 126 99 207 243 89 59 301 402 48

441 132 88 92 98 205 235 108 50 282 386 54

88% 78% 85% 95% 93% 89% 87% 64% 93% 96% 100% -

12% 22% 15% 5% 7% 11% 13% 36% 7% 4% - 100%

Page 86

QUESTION 30: WITHIN THE PAST YEAR, HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING?

Total

Base

Unweighted

Weighted

Class


Gender

Male Female

Residence

On-Campus Adjacent

Off-Campus

Vehicle

Yes No

Within the past year,have you participated inany of the...

Intercollegiate athletics

Intramural or clubsports

Social fraternities orsororities

Religious or interfaithgroups

Political or social actiongroups

Music and otherperforming art groups

Residence hallprograms

Student organizations

305 59 68 94 68 153 152 76 53 176 263 42

299 94 58 68 67 149 150 93 44 162 251 48

44% 56% 37% 37% 43% 54% 34% 45% 50% 41% 45% 36%

41% 37% 46% 42% 42% 49% 32% 43% 51% 37% 42% 36%

10% 8% 12% 6% 13% 11% 9% 15% 10% 6% 9% 12%

27% 18% 32% 24% 30% 19% 34% 23% 22% 30% 27% 26%

9% 3% 3% 13% 16% 7% 11% 5% 6% 12% 9% 7%

22% 23% 20% 26% 21% 17% 28% 25% 22% 21% 21% 27%

19% 19% 32% 12% 18% 16% 21% 29% 38% 8% 17% 28%

19% 13% 10% 24% 32% 14% 24% 12% 22% 23% 19% 21%

Page 87

APPENDIX B: SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Documents

CSU-Pueblo Student Survey Report · Similarly, with marijuana, respondents’ perceptions are likely worse than reality. Respondents believed that, on average, 13 percent of students