Upload
chuck
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
June 2010. CSA 2010 Dealing with Deficiencies. Mark Langer, New York Rich Bleser, Milwaukee Joseph Darby, Portland Doug Dickinson, Green Bay. Agenda. Recent changes Time line Data Review Process How BASIC scores are determined Strategies to improve BASIC scores. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
www.marsh.com
CSA 2010Dealing with Deficiencies
June 2010
Mark Langer, New York
Rich Bleser, Milwaukee
Joseph Darby, Portland
Doug Dickinson, Green Bay
2Marsh
Agenda
Recent changes
Time line
Data Review Process
How BASIC scores are determined
Strategies to improve BASIC scores
3Marsh
Timeline of Implementation
April 12 – November 30, 2010 – Motor carriers can preview their own data by seeing their roadside inspections/violations and crash events organized by Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Category (BASIC).
4Marsh
Timeline of Implementation
June – The Operational Model (Op-Model) Test will end.
July – The four “50/50” Op-Model Test states, Colorado, Georgia, Missouri and New Jersey, will join the five 100% Op-Model Test states in implementing the program.
August – Motor carriers will be able to see an assessment of their violations based on the new Carrier Safety Measurement System (CSMS) which will replace SafeStat later in 2010.
Fall 2010 SafeStat will be replaced by the CSMS. CSMS will be available to the public,
including shippers and insurance companies. FMCSA/States will prioritize enforcement using the CSMS. FMCSA will begin to issue Warning Letters to carriers with deficient BASICs. Roadside inspectors will use the CSMS results to identify carriers for
inspection.
Winter 2010 - Safety Fitness Determination Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is scheduled to be released.
2011 – Enforcement staff will be trained, and new interventions will be implemented State-by-State
5Marsh
A New Operational Model (Op-Model)A New Operational Model (Op-Model)
6Marsh
CSA 2010 Data Reviewhttps://csa2010.fmcsa.dot.gov
7Marsh
What is the CSA 2010 Data Review?
Website that organizes existing carrier safety performance by CSA 2010’s BASICs
– Inspection data (24 months)
– Crash data (24 months)
Provides information and best practices for improving carrier safety
Allows carriers to identify trends in safety performance in order to begin addressing problems today
8Marsh
Why Provide a Data Review?
Incremental step toward SMS implementation
– Understanding the 7 BASICs and violations tied to each
Proactively engages industry to improve safety and prepare for CSA 2010
Carriers are given an opportunity to review and update data
– dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov/login.asp
– MCS-150 updates
Advance notice prior to rollout
9Marsh
Data Review Access Details
Carrier can only access their own results– Access requires carrier PIN
https://li-public.fmcsa.dot.gov/LIVIEW/pkg_registration.prc_option_decision
CSA 2010 Test Carriers will continue to have access to CSI as well as the Data Review
Public will not have access to Data Review
FMCSA and State Partners have access to every carrier’s data review
10Marsh
Login Page for Motor Carriers through the FMCSA (Compass) PortalLogin Page for Motor Carriers through the FMCSA (Compass) Portal
11Marsh
Data Review –Carrier Summary ScreenData Review –Carrier Summary Screen
12Marsh
Data Review –Carrier Summary Screen (cont’d)Data Review –Carrier Summary Screen (cont’d)
13Marsh
Data Review –Carrier Summary Screen (cont’d)Data Review –Carrier Summary Screen (cont’d)
14Marsh
Data Review –Violation Drill DownData Review –Violation Drill Down
Violations found in the BASIC and their counts
Detailed Inspection Reports related to the BASIC
15Marsh
Data Review –Violation Drill DownData Review –Violation Drill Down
Link to DataQs to request a data review
Access CSA 2010 information to prepare for implementation
Link to Information Center with tips and FAQs
16Marsh
Frequently Asked Questions
Question: What does the data displayed in the Data Review mean and what should I do with it?
Response: The Data Review is designed to allow you to review:Inspections, violations and crash data that will be used to assess your performance in SMS. These are activities currently linked to your DOT#. Data for accuracy.Behaviors demonstrated by your drivers through violations that may require attention (i.e. sort your various BASIC data by driver name to review performance by those operating for you.)
Determining BASIC Scores
18Marsh
How Calculated
How long ago it occurred
Severity of inspection or crash
Normalize the data by inspections or power units
Place into Peer Group
Ranked in each peer group as percentiles
Intervention Threshold
19Marsh
Time Weight
Violation in last 6 months = multiplier of 3
Violation date 6 to 12 months ago = multiplier of 2
Violation date 12 to 24 months ago = multiplier of 1
Over 24 months = no impact on carrier
20Marsh
Severity Weight
Level of crash risk from violation– Rated 1 to 10 (lowest to highest risk)– OOS weight of 2 added to each out of service item– Capped at 30 for a single inspection
Crash Indicator– Tow only Weight of 1– Injury – Fatality Weight of 2– Hazardous Materials release additional 1 point
21Marsh
Peer Group
Peer Group Average power units Inspections
1 1 - 5 5-10
2 5 – 15 11-20
3 16 – 50 21-100
4 51 – 500 101-500
5 501 + 500+
22Marsh
Intervention Thresholds
Basic Passenger Fleet
Hazardous Materials Fleet
Other Fleets
Unsafe driving, Fatigued Driving, Crash indicator
50% 67% 72%
Driver Fitness, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Maintenance, Cargo
55% 72% 77%
Strategies to Improve
24Marsh
Summary of Strategies
Decrease the negative events– Decrease the numerator
Increase the number used to normalize the data– Increase the denominator
Change intervention Level– Update MC150 if no longer moving people or hazardous materials
25Marsh
Calculations – Power Unit Based
Unsafe Driving
Controlled Substances / Alcohol
Crash Indicator (Will be miles & power units)
Measure = Total of time & severity weighted violations Average Measure of power units
Crash Indicator = Total of time & severity weighted crashes Average measure of power units
>>> More inspections will not reduce the score
26Marsh
Calculations – Inspections Based
Fatigued Driving
Driver Fitness
Maintenance
Cargo- Related (size, weight, load securement, hazardous materials)
Measure = Total of time & severity weighted violations Number of time weighted relevant inspections
>>> More CLEAN inspections WILL reduce the score
27Marsh
Decrease the negative events Focus on who is driving the numbers
6-8 % of the drivers are causing 80% of the violation points
Measure results
Accountability & Clear expectations
28Marsh
Internal ControlsUnsafe Driving – Addressing speeding
Are you taking this seriously?
Do I have a speed policy?
Do I have my vehicles properly set for top speed?
Do I have a speed alert on my GPS?
Do I regularly conduct a download from my ECM for high speeds?
Do I manage my mechanics so no one cheats the speed?
Do I take motorists reports seriously?
How do I check my drivers logs for over speed? Do I have a policy for HOS speed? Does it have teeth? Do we enforce it? Do we discharge for it?
Are drivers held accountable for warning tickets?
Do I conduct covert and overt surveillance?
29Marsh
Fatigued Driving
Manage hours of service
Dispatchers held accountable
Log falsification checks
Move to electronic logs
30Marsh
Driver Fitness
Manage expiration process– Medical qualification– CDL– Endorsement
MVR checks– Disqualified drivers– Semi-annual MVR check process– Violation alerts
31Marsh
Maintenance / Cargo
Identify components failing
Operations education– Business as usual no longer acceptable
Mechanic education
Driver education
Manager / Mechanic man safety lanes
Review load securement process
Review maintenance inspection program– DVIR– PM process
32Marsh
Decrease the negative eventsMaintenance & Cargo
Time Weighted Applicable Violations
Review Data and determine most impactful– Type of defect– Defects by facilities– Equipment type
3 of top 4 light related
33Marsh
Crash Indicator
Management controls – Safety culture
Defensive driving program
Driver education and preparation
Technology– Hard braking– Roll stability– Other emerging technology
Actions following near misses– Motorist complaints– Driver monitoring programs
Driver recertification (post loss or annual process)
34Marsh
Increase the DenominatorGetting more inspections
Will Help
Fatigued Driving
Driver Fitness
Maintenance
Cargo- Related
Can Only Hurt
Unsafe Driving
Controlled Substances / Alcohol
Crash Indicator
>>> Understand where clean inspections come from and work to increase the inspection there
35Marsh
Summary
Monitor data and take actions– Access FMCSA Portal– DataQ to remove incorrect data– Analyze and trend
Understand and address primary causes of negative events– Unsafe drivers– Ineffective mechanics / vendors– Systemic changes to management controls
Educate – Educate – Educate– Defensive driving– Impact of CSA on operations
36Marsh
A New Operational Model (Op-Model)A New Operational Model (Op-Model)
37Marsh
FMCSA will stay on schedule
“For two months, carriers have been able to view their data. . . . I can’t say it often enough, if carriers aren’t looking at their data, shame on them,” she said.
“By the end of August, they’ll see the rating system, the measurement system and, by the end of the year, the public — that’s the insurance industry, that’s the shipping industry, and everybody else will have access to all that data as well.”
Then, Ferro said, during 2011, “you’ll start to see the phased rollout of the actual intervention processes, state-by-state and carrier-by-carrier.”
-FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro quoted in June 21, 2010 issue of Transport Topics
38Marsh
Questions / Discussion
For more information contact
Joe Darby [email protected]
Doug Dickinson [email protected]
Rich Bleser [email protected]
www.marsh.com