View
218
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
CONTENTS:
The Building Block Volume 6 , Issue 6
June 12, 2015
1
SERVICE UPDATES 2
SAFETY COURSES 2
ARTICLE– SECOND
PHASE STALLED SITE
3
BUZZ OF THE MONTH 5
HORROR STORIES 6
MEET CRSG:
CRSG INTERN
PROGRAM
7
RECRUITMENT 8
CRSG NEWS 9
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
JUNE
10
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
CONSTRUCTION & REALTY SERVICES GROUP
68 Whitehall Street
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Tel: (516) 256-0317
Fax: (516) 256-0335
307 West 38th Street, Suite 1218
New York, NY 10018
Tel: (212)736-6900
Fax: (212) 736-6910
www.crs-group.com
Get Back to Building Initiative Extended Through June!
On May 4, 2015 the Department of Buildings launched Get Back To Building- an initiative
intended to get delayed projects back on track and construction workers back on
jobsites. Throughout the month of May, nearly 200 jobs were approved when attendees
met after hours with plan examiners to resolve objections and to get their construction
applications moved to approval.
Due to the success of the May launch, the program will be extended through June. Over
the next month, the Department is available to licensed architects and engineers,
developers, filing representatives and property owners whose projects have not yet been
approved and have outstanding objections from previous Department plan examinations.
As in past initiatives, agency experts will work with the applicants during these sessions
to resolve plan objections and develop solutions in order to approve new buildings as well
as major and minor alterations.
Due to the extension of the Get Back to Building Program and the expiration of the 421A
period on 6/15 it is anticipated that some of the lead times that have been built up for
initial plan reviews and appointment dates will begin to shrink to more reasonable levels.
The combination of these factors should reduce the approval times for projects filed over
the last few months and allow everyone and not just those seeking the 421A benefits to
truly Get Back to Building.
DOB BULLETINS
Fixed-Height, Low-Profile Raised
Floor Systems
Bulletin 2015-009
This document establishes
acceptance criteria for recognitions
of fixed-height, low-profile raised
floor systems
Raising, Lifting, Elevating or Mov-
ing Buildings
Bulletin 2015-010
This document clarifies special
inspection requirements related to
raising, lifting, elevating or moving
buildings.
Proposed Easement Agreements
and Restrictive Declarations
Bulletin 2015-011
This document establishes ac-
ceptance criteria for site specific
approval off fuel gas compressors,
duct burners and heat recovery
steam generators used in cogener-
ation and Combines Heat and Pow-
er (“CHP”) projects.
02
40 Hour Safety 30 Hour Concrete 30 Hour OSHA 7 Hour SSM Refresher
Tues. 6/2:4-9:30pm
Thurs. 6/4: 4-9:30pm
Tues. 6/9: 4-9:30pm
Thurs. 6/11: 4-9:30pm
Tues. 6/16: 4-9:30pm
Thurs. 6/18: 4-9:30pm
Tues. 6/23: 4-9:30pm
Thurs. 6/25: 4-9:30pm
Tues. 6/30:4-9:30pm
Mon. 6/1: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/3: 4-9:30pm
Mon. 6/8: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/10: 4-9:30pm
Mon. 6/15: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/17: 4-9:30pm
Mon. 6/22: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/24: 4-9:30pm
Mon. 6/29: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/3: 4-9:30pm
Fri. 6/5: 4-9:30pm
Fri. 6/12: 4-9:30pm
Fri. 6/19: 4-9:30pm
Fri. 6/29: 4-9:30pm
Wed. 6/24: 4-9:30pm
Sat. 6/6: 8-3:30pm
Sat: 6/20: 8-3:30pm
10 Hour OSHA
Sat: 6/12: 8-7pm
Sat: 6/26: 8-7pm
SAFETY COURSES
SERVICE UPDATES
As of June 1, 2015
Limited Alteration Application (LAA): Renewals with the same BIS Number
LAA/ Permit Renewal and Hub Authentication Unit will now offer LAA Renewals with the same BIS number and a standard
renewal fee of $100.
Benefits:
BIS number stays the same
Multiple LAA Renewals allowed if necessary;
Decreases the number of open filings related to the same scope of work that will require sign-off by the licensee of
record.
Requirements:
Standard $100 renewal fee
No change to applicant or the proposed work summary
Applicant’s insurance must be up-to-date and active
LAA renewal must be manually filed and have a B-Scan sticker affixed to the application.
As of June 1, 2015
After– Hours Inspection: First Phase
DOB will launch an after-hour inspection initiative for development projects enrolled in the High Rise Program.
Participants can request after hours Construction, Plumbing and Electrical inspections.
Requests for evenings and weekends must be received during normal business hours.
As of June 1, 2015
Hazardous Formwork: Visual Observation
Pursuant to BC 3305.3.3.1, a qualified observer shall perform visual observations of the formwork to validate general con-
formance with the design intent.
The observations shall be performed by an observer with the following qualifications:
1. The formwork designer
2. An employee of the formwork designer under his/her direct supervision
3. A registered design professional retained by the formwork designer
4. An employee of such retained registered design professional under the direct supervision of such retained
registered design professional
Effective June 1, 2015, observed formwork conditions hazardous to life, safety, or health which has not been immediately
corrected by the responsible contract shall be reported to the DOB by the formwork observer.
03
ARTICLES
SECOND PHASE
STALLED SITE
With the bettering of the local real estate market and the economy in New York City, no compliance issue
has been more frustrating than the second phase of the stalled site program.
As we may remember, the stalled site program was one offered by the DOB where a site could be grand-
fathered with its Old Code (1968) approval for four years if certain “setup” and maintenance conditions
were met per the New York City DOB regulations.
These components were not only costly, but owners undertook them to maintain their benefits in regard
to mechanical systems, scissor stairs, standpipe, and elevator/core size that benefitted them in regard to
FAR and useable/rentable space for their project.
This grandfathering is supposed to be good for four years and appeared to be an acceptable rationale to
promote some sanity and benefits in a down economy.
Now that many sites are approaching “re-activation” the base concept of the stalled site program is be-
ing revisited.
DOB has opted for a second bite at the apple where a project must be re-evaluated coming out of the
stalled site program with a 3 criteria evaluation:
Permits current
No violations
No change in building design
The criteria employed should “allow” an owner to keep the grandfathered benefits for their approved de-
signs.
Needless to say, what should be a simple process now is “stalled” by re-evaluation protocol of a plan
exam and a programmatic release.
Developers also have to be wary that a change in their project that is necessary to be saleable for a
changing market might foster a complete re-design under the new code. This cannot only result in time
delays due to re-design and re-approval but also possible negative financial feasibility resulting in FAR
loss from a redesign to accommodate the 2008 code. Construction cost increases can be amortized into
a project to recoup over time, but not so for lost useable and rentable s/f.
In addition, there appears to be some confusion as to the applicability of the New York City Energy Code
(2010) and its effects on stalled sites. One would think the building code grandfathering program of the
stalled sites would apply to the energy code, but alas the technical aspects of the legislation may prevent
such an assumption.
The applicability of the new energy code to already designed stalled projects may be equally disastrous
as it may affect the building envelope substantially enough to create new compliance and zoning issues
that can also render the project more problematic and costly to construct.
It is important that the old code/ new code and energy code applicability of the stalled sites be defined to
allow owners and purchasers of stalled site to get the benefit of the intention of the program. Build, put
properties at the tax role and get people to work should be the goal, not bureaucratic and technocratic.
04
DOB INFO
Building One City
Commissioner Chandler’s plan that will fundamentally reform the agency to en-
hance public safety, reduce wait times and delays, and modernize all aspects of
the agency to meet the needs of a 21st century city.
05
BUZZ OF THE MONTH
CRSG is a “one stop” compliance, safety and engineering entity for the NYC real estate and construction
industry.
Domani Consulting can provide all compliance services from the filing and approval of plans to the
signoff of D14 applications; to obtaining TCO/C of O for Alt 1 or NB applications. Domani’s expeditors
work through all agencies (DOB, DOT, NYCFD, Landmarks, DEP, etc.) to prepare, file, approve and
signoff projects. In conjunction with Domani Design, plans can be prepared and engineering and
architectural services can be provided. Combine these services with Domani Inspection for either Alt II
D14, special inspection requirements and/or all controlled inspections/test requirements (with its certified
affiliate-Labs) for either major alterations or NB’s. Our “one stop” filing, controlled compliance
program/mechanism completes the full service package.
EWBC offers full scale labor services that will provide all required collective bargaining labor as well as
fully managed general condition labor.
CR Safety offers services for safety management combining program, plan and safety design
development, safety inspection, management, record keeping, physical protection and training to meet
any or all safety needs on a site.
ABOUT US
Don’t forget to check
out our website at
www.crs-group.com
The SSM shortage is reaching epic proportions and will result in the delay
of jobs starting unless more licenses are issued and/ or protocols for
coming off the SS Program are amended.
The DOB has made the delivery of any function associated with 421A a
priority. Site safety plans, plan exams, demolition applications, waving of
required items have been moved to the front of the line. Although it is a
benefit, it will fall upon the owner/contractor/design professional to “clean
up” any problems that occurs because of haste on resolving these items
prior to the job progressing to TCO.
Recent city council hearings on Construction Site Safety and reports from
NYCOSH have shined the spotlight on non-union construction companies
for their safety performance.
Recently, the NYPD has accompanied DOB to inspect and to possibly arrest
blatant and willful offenders.
The shortage of general technical site personnel (Super, PM’s) has also
been raised to epidemic proportions as well as the subs being unable to
marshal a force of experienced tradesmen. This manpower issue has
thwarted any attempt to start an acceleration program on some jobs.
I have a disapproved ALT1 HUB job in which
the only proposed work to be performed is
creating a gym/rec. room in the cellar and a
penthouse roof addition to the top 6th floor
apartments. The examiner had issued objec-
tions pertaining to exterior/interior stairs and
egress pathways out of the building, all of
which are existing conditions from when the
building was first erected in 1938 and which
are also not to be touched during the proposed work. An objection was also given that the building must
comply with "Quality Housing" regulations. These objections are erroneous and we are not required to comply
with them. In fact, It would be impossible to do so. There was absolutely no getting through to her in the plan
exam. We are now seeking assistance from the deputy commissioner at the HUB and in the meantime
searching through old DOB records to verify existing conditions of the building from 1938.
06
HORROR STORIES
Inside Scoop
From Domani
Expediters
I recently had a 421(a) job that was ready for NB approval. We had a remaining 24 comments 16 of which
were duplicate comments or comments related to prior to approval items required which could be accepted
and received in borough. The examiner however would not review the comments and remove the items re-
quired in order to approve the application until he himself reviewed each line item and form during a plan
exam. He delayed our project start over 1 month due to trivial/duplicate comments and items required which
he could have let the clerical receive. During examination he went above and beyond the requirements of
directive 2 of 1974, reviewing and reading each note section of the FO, SOE, MH , ARCH, and Structural
plans. He would not approve the applications for reasons such as : I do not like Barn doors, they are danger-
ous and need to be removed from your interior design plans and the architectural drawings. I want elevations
located at every doorway and 10 feet from each other in the court yard. You must show bathroom fixture
counts on each floor plan, not just the fixture page. MH notes for the EUP cards must read that you will also
comply with ECCCNYS regulations. In addition to absurd comments such as these he made us list all permit
numbers associated with the NB on the cover page, prior to approval. He reviewed the sprinkler and stand-
pipe filings, even though he was not the examiner (to confirm accuracy he said), he there-reviewed the Ener-
gy after we were audited and approved ( again to confirm accuracy). Also re reviewed and accepted docu-
ments such as the PGL1, TR2/TR3 and TR1s which he does not need to. the Clerical are supposed to accept
these during the permit process, he insisted we have an additional meeting to do so, prior to approval. A lot
of DOB employees let the "authority" of approving a permits go to their head, but this examiner had taken it to
a whole new level. Repeatedly he kept saying that he was creating legal documents and precedent and that
his job was of the utmost importance. When reminded that we were 421(a) and needed to secure vesting on
the job, he stated " this is not my problem, but yours". Eventually after an additional 4 emergency appoint-
ments and the urging of his supervisor the application comments were approved and the permit obtained.
Recently I had an FDNY examiner review an application for relocation of a standpipe Siamese connection. The
relocation consisted of moving the Siamese about 6 inches from its current location due to a planter box
being removed during a plaza renovation. The examiner would issue comments via email and keep the previ-
ously submitted TM1 and plans. The regular way of issuing the comments would be to notify me to pick up
the TM1 and drawings along with comment sheet. You need the TM1 in order to resubmit the application to
meet comments. Instead she directed me via the comments letter to resubmit with a letter regarding my
FPMIS number. When I attempted to do this I was stopped at the window in DOB. They refused to take the
application without the TM1 form. All other examiners return the TM1 when they have no comments to it, so
that you can resubmit. When I called the examiner to notify her of my dilemma and ask that she send the TM1
down to my co-worker on the ground floor (she sits on the third floor). She notified me that 1. I was wasting
her time and she had no time to discuss what she considered a "trivial matter". and then she even went as far
as to say, "Ma'am I think you mistake me for someone who cares, get another TM1 and come back another
day to submit."
07
MEET CRSG
CRSG INTERN
PROGRAM
NYC FUN FACTS
Broadway, originating from Lower Manhattan at Bowling Green
and ending in Albany, is one of the world's longest streets at 150
mi (241 km). The official name of this street is Highway 9.
The internship program at CRSG, Inc. and affiliated companies is
in full swing. The internship program at CRSG, Inc. has grown in
both participation and depth of learning and hands on training
since 2013. this summer’s interns are students at schools such
as Stony Brook University, University of Michigan, Bucknell Uni-
versity, Virginia Tech, Boston College and Penn State University
with majors in engineering, architecture and business.
CRSG believes there exists a tremendous potential in the Real
Estate and Construction industry to partner with educational in-
stitutions for future recruitment through internships and scholar-
ship programs. The “construction” side of the business is
sometimes lost on architectural, engineering, and business stu-
dents during their years in college; the internship program is an
invaluable way of introducing the smart and talented pool of col-
lege students to the exciting, growing fields in the construction
industry.
As the New York Yankees have learned, the foundation of suc-
cess comes from a strong farm system. Homegrown recruit-
ment and training produce employees familiar with company cul-
ture and protocol and allow them to be productive and effective
employees faster. Sprinkle in “mentoring” and the CRSG intern-
ship becomes a launch pad of a successful recruitment program.
08
Our Construction &
Realty Services Group
seeks dynamic
individuals to join our
team!
RECRUITMENT
08
Our Construction &
Realty Services Group
seeks dynamic
individuals to join our
team!
RECRUITMENT
Key Duties & Responsibilities:
The following will be some of your tasks, but will not be limited to:
1. Responsibilities of the Site Safety Manager (SSM), Site Safety Coordinator (SSC) and Concrete Safety
Manager (CSM) are to monitor compliance with the safety requirements of Chapter 33 of the NYC Building
Code, as well as OSHA and to perform all other safety duties assigned by CRSG, the owner or contractor to
meet legal requirements by record-keeping and reporting on major buildings in New York City.
2. The SSM, SSC CSM shall maintain a daily log book notating any unsafe acts or deficiencies with locations as
well as maintain a permit log.
3. Check Site Safety Plan daily to ensure that the approved Plans are current and up to date.
4. Meet on a weekly basis with the designated representative of each subcontractor to ascertain that all
subcontractors are complying with the applicable provisions of Chapter 33 of the NYC Building Code, OSHA,
FDNY and any applicable local or federal agencies.
5. Any additional tasks identified by your supervisor
Qualifications:
NYC Site Safety Managers License
Must be a team player and have the ability to effectively multi-task
Detail-oriented and ability to work independently with moderate supervision and
guidance
Good written and verbal communication skills
Architecture and/or construction experience a plus
Must be internet savvy & have experience with Microsoft Office (Outlook, Excel, Word, etc.)
General knowledge of NYC building codes and/or filing process a plus.
Safety Management, Analyzing Information, Informing Others, Written Communication, Legal Compliance,
Judgment, Integrity, NYC DOB Chapter 33, OSHA, FDNY & DOT Compliance, Presentation Skills. Microsoft
Word & Excel.
SITE SAFETY MANAGERS
CONSTRUCTION FIELD INSPECTOR
Key Duties & Responsibilities:
1. The following will be some of your tasks, but will not be limited to:
2. Performing field inspections at construction sites per Department of Buildings requirements.
3. Prepare written reports on multi-discipline inspections per Management.
4. Coordination of drawings and field conditions during onsite inspections.
5. Other miscellaneous tasks requested by your supervisor.
Company will support obtaining necessary ICC certifications to perform various special inspections.
Qualifications
Construction, Architecture, and /or Engineering experience desired
General knowledge of NYC construction codes and/or filing process a plus
Request 5 years minimum experience in related fields.
Must be internet savvy & have experience with Microsoft Office (Outlook, Excel, Word, etc.)
Good written and verbal communication skills
Ability to interpret engineering/architectural plans and specifications
Must be a team player and have the ability to effectively multi-task
Detail-oriented and ability to work independently with moderate supervision
and guidance
Ability to prioritize and meet deadlines
09
CRSG NEWS
Please visit www.crs-group.com and check it out!
You can find useful information on our companies, our services, personnel,
recruitment, and safety training and events.
Look for the CRSG Newsletter on the second Friday of every month!
Tell us how we’re doing! Send an email to [email protected]
WORDSEARCH
CODE
COMPLIANCE
CONDUCT
CONFLICT
ETHICS
LAW
MORALS
OPERATION
PRINCIPLES
REGULATION
RESPECT
SAFEGUARD
SAFETY
STANDARDS
N R B T W T S Z X E C C W T G E I N R Y
D G E K C E I V T E S E L P I C N I R P
E R F G L I E P C J C T E C J R H L S Z
Q E A B U I L N G W N O C T I F A I L N
R I Q U V L A F B L X N N E H W R Y A X
L H Q N G I A R N U U O H D P I Y L R T
E D O C L E X T U O X I S N U S C F O K
A V V P G M F J I J C T F A O C E S M P
M T M E X K N A M O G A V G F Q T R Y G
S O H C Y K E A S N N R W N C E M X B Q
C S D R A D N A T S F E M X K J T H E U
Y H B X M N I J M L T P R C G Y T Y F I
O N J M K F Q U H K W O D Q P Z U P A Z
J N P O X I G P G N K I S C S J C C J L
W D L A E J L J F D U P V R K I D H V E
6/2: REBNY– Residential Deal of the Year Committee @ Halstead Property
4-5:30pm
6/3: REBNY– Residential Board of Directors @ REBNY Boardroom 9-11am
6/4: REBNY– Residential Sales Agent Bootcamp Seminar @ Mendik Edu. Center
9-11am
6/4: PWC– Meet the Real Estate Industry @ Club 101 5:30- 8pm
6/5: BOMA– Membership Committee Meeting @ BOMA HQ 8:30-9:30am
6/5: REBNY– Annual Residential Downtown Breakfast Roundtable Discussion
8:30-11am
6/8: BOMA– Annual Golf Outing @ Edgewood Country Club
6/9: BOMA– Board of Directors Meeting @ BOMA HQ 8:30-11am
6/9: REBNY– Retail Deal of the Year Cocktail Party @ Club 101
6/10: REBNY– Commercial New Members Ethics Course @ REBNY Boardroom
9-10:30am
6/11: REBNY– RLS Technology and Vendor Committee Meeting @ REBNY
Boardroom 2-4pm
6/12: BOMA– Codes and Regulations/ Government Affairs Committee @ BOMA
NY HQ 8:30-9:30am
6/15-17: BOMA– Accelerated Class: Fundamentals of Facilities Management
6/16: REBNY– Residential Breakfast Club Seminar@ Mendik Edu. Center
9:30-11am
6/17: REBNY– Membership Committee @Burton Resnick Conference Room
9-11am
6/18: REBNY– Education Committee Meeting @ REBNY Boardroom 9:30-11am
6/18: BTEA– Leadership Reception @ Gustavino’s 6:30pm
6/23: REBNY– Residential Deal of the Year Committee Meeting @ Halstead Prop-
erty 4-5:30pm
6/24: REBNY– Residential Sales Council Meeting @ REBNY Litwin Classroom
12-2pm
6/24: BTEA– Meet the Owner: A BTEA Project Case Study @ TBD
6/25: NYARM– Steam Heating and Piping Systems & What Goes Wrong With
Them @ General Society Pavilion Library 9:30-2:30pm
6/25: REBNY– RLS Board of Directors @ REBNY Boardroom 2-4pm
6/28-30: BOMA– International Every Building Conference & Expo– Los Angeles,
CA
SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT
1 2
REBNY– Residential
Deal of the Year
Committee
3
REBNY– Residential
Board of Directors
4
REBNY– Residential
Sales Agent
Bootcamp Seminar
5
BOMA– Membership
Committee Meeting
REBNY– Annual
Residential Down-
town Breakfast
Roundtable Discus-
sion
6
7 8
BOMA– Annual Golf
Outing
9
BOMA– Board of
Directors Meeting
10
REBNY– Commercial
New Members Ethics
Course
11
REBNY– RLS Tech-
nology and Vendor
Committee Meeting
12
BOMA– Codes and
Regulations/ Govern-
ment Affairs Commit-
tee
13
14 15
BOMA– Accelerated
Class: Fundamentals
of Facilities Manage-
ment
16
BOMA– Accelerated
Class: Fundamentals
of Facilities Manage-
ment
17
BOMA– Accelerated
Class: Fundamentals
of Facilities Manage-
ment
18
REBNY– Education
Committee Meeting
19 20
21 22 23
REBNY– Residential
Deal of the Year
Committee Meeting
24
REBNY– Residential
Sales Council Meet-
ing
25
NYARM– Steam
Heating and Piping
Systems & What
Goes Wrong With
Them
26 27
28
BOMA– International
Every Building Con-
ference & Expo
29
BOMA– International
Every Building Con-
ference & Expo
30
BOMA– International
Every Building Con-
ference & Expo
JUNE 2015
10