31C12NW8602 2.15132 LAKE010

REPORT ON VLF EM-16 SURVEY

Crowe River Property

Claims 1150996 and 1150997

Lake Township

Southeastern Ontario

\

UJo:o

(Z

U)

D.

5(T*"z

h-LJ

o ~

1.0 Introduction.

1.1 Property description, location and access

Claims 1150996 and 1150997 are located in the northeast part of Lot 16 and 17, Concession IV of Lake Township In the central part of Hastings county In southeastern Ontario. The claims are located in a surveyed township with surface rights patented and measure 600 m easterly by 600 m northerly more or less.

The claims are covered by the Bannockburn map of the National Topographic Series with NTS designation of 31C/13. It is situated at Latitude 44 degrees, 41 minutes north and Longitude 77 degrees, 45 minutes west.

Generally the property lies approximately 57.9 kilometers (36 Miles) southeast of Bancroft or 80.5 kilometers (50 miles) northeast of Peterborough.

Access, because of isolation is difficult, a series of highway, 4 wheel drive dirt sideroads and water travel is required. Highways 7 and 62 are used from Peterborough, then west from Millbridge on a gravel road which deteriorates into a 4 wheel drive road and which leads to Whetstone Lake, then a short distance south by canoe to the claims.

1.2 Physiography

The property is situated within the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Hastings Basin subdivision of the Grenville province of eastern Ontario. Generally, the terrain is rugged with numerous streams, ponds and lakes; the Crowe River drains the area. Relief fluctuation varies from 500 feet to 750 feet, usually the result of a series of anticlines and synclines whose axes trend approximately northeast-southwest. The property is covered by Bannockburn (GSC, 1950b). Due to this topographical nature, lumbering rather than farming is practised and as observed, fishing has declined over the years.

Vegetation consists of a predominance of mixed growth. The area has been cut over and consists mostly of secondary growth hardwood with some pine and spruce.

Precambrian rock exposure is excellent; pleistocene deposits minimally cover bedrock.

2.0 Previous work/current exploration activity

Available documented work completed on the property Is limited. This documentation indicates the majority of previous exploration was directed at base metal or iron deposits. A summary of this work and that of the immediate area follows:

1956-60:Merlin Mines Ltd.Fifty-eight d.d.h. 36 to 90 feet in depth and averaging 85 feet were completed within a large portion of the immediate area during this time. Lithology encountered included: slate, quartzite, porphry, garnet gneiss, augen gneiss, staurolite and greenstone with rare stringers of py, cpy. Notably, ddh.11 encountered metagabbro, slate, magnetite (53*ft Fe), augen gneiss, cpy and greenstone. Additionally, mag. and EM surveys were completed in 1959. Noteworthy, Alsof Mines Ltd. held possession of ground in 1957. Several large trenches were dug and blasted to better expose the Cu mineralization. Refer to 63.10358.

1960:Selco Exploration Co. Ltd. completed EM and magnetometer surveys as well as some drilling on 9 claims over Mud Turtle Lake. Survey results indicated evidence of north-trending shear zones on the east shore at the north end of the lake. Disseminations of cpy, po, py and bornite in quartz- biotite paragneiss was discovered; this appears associated with several E- W cross fractures. The magnetometer survey delineated 3 anomalies in the area of a dioritic outcrop. This implies that these may be the result of many small dioritic intrusives which are not generally favourable hosts to economic mineralization. Ddh #3 drilled in a weak conductor indicated a 12 ft. wide wet shear with minor sulphides. E-W shearing was confirmed by ddh #4. Drilling progressively encountered mineralization to occur sporadically over very narrow widths. Refer to 63.1057.

1961-.Sharpe Instruments Canada Limited completed a mag. survey over ground which included 2 claims over Whetstone Lake. It was found that lithology included sheared, and granitized intrusions that highly altered the surrounding rocks to form the paragneiss striking N-S, and having a steep to westerly foliation. The paragneiss caused marked zones of weakness or shear zones, the major zone represented by the Crowe River. This shear zone was drilled one mile south of the lake; Copper mineralization was exposed on the shear zone. This shear-associated copper mineralization resulted In an EM survey for investigation of zone and conductor presence over Whetstone Lake.

1965:Whetstone Lake Mines Ltd. acquired 14 contiguous unpatented mining claims totalling 800 acres in Cone. Ill and IV, Lots 15, 16 and 17 east of Crowe River immediately south of Whetstone Lake called the Lake Township property. Two mag. anomalies were tested by four holes: two, 244 feet in depth; two 324 feet deep. Disseminated suphides in magnetite was intersected; the best Cu mineralization reported ,40^o over 3.0 feet., Fe ranged 13.4 to 27.76*^. Irregular, jointed and fractured dark grey quartzite, biotite gneiss, minor greywacke containing epidote, and chlorite zones as well as the suphides chalcopyrite and pyrite were encountered. It was felt that because of the sill-like attitude and the degree of metamorphism confusing the issue, the diorite and quartz diorite may or may not be a true intrusion. Refer to 63.4050.

1991:M. Osiel of Etobicoke, Ontario completed assessment work credits of sampling, and geochem survey on 6 claims. Highly carbonate/sulphide rocks reported only trace amounts of gold. Refer to 2.13953 and R. 13001.

The original discovery of copper mineralization was made in 1955 at the rapids on Crowe River by Mr. Ivan Sopha of Cordova Mines, Ontario. Several zones of copper sulphide mineralization was delineated; magnetite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite and bornite were found in sheared phases of altered metasediments and metavolcanics. Trenching and blasting ensued.

In 1957, Alsof Mines Ltd. acquired the ground; additional trenching and blasting better exposed the mineralization. A portion of the property was then optioned to Merlin Mines Ltd. in 1959 who conducted mag and EM surveys and drilled beneath the main showing.

3. Geology

3.1 Regional geology

The general geology of Lake Township is suitably explained and presented by R.K. Laakso, 1968 in the ODM Geological Report 54, Geology of Lake Township

Lake Township is within the Hastings Basin structural subdivision of the Haliburton-Bancroft area of the Grenville province of the Canadian Shield (Laakso, p.3). Lithology is stratigraphically Paleozoic and Precambrian. Metasediments consisting of marble, paragneiss, paraschist and meta-arkose and metavolcanics predominantly amphibolites, rhyodacite flows and tuffs and greenstone schists

comprise the Precambrian. Subsequent folding and metamorphism during the

Grenville orogeny occurred conjoint with gabbro/syenite/granite intrusion resulting in northeast-southwest axial fold trends which parallel regional fold pattern. Crossfolding at right-angles to the fold axis later developed.

In the OGS Misc. Paper 96, Summary of Field Work, 1980, T.R. Carter in his paper "No. 24 Metallic Mineral Deposits of the Grenville Province, Southeastern Ontario" summarizes the known types of deposits with examples to assist In delineating areas of economic interest. Carter denoted the following classifications; table 1 documents deposits examined in classification.

1. Statiform Volcanic/Volcaniclastic Hosted Pyrite Deposits.2. Stratabound Skarn-Hosted Magnetite Deposits.3. Intrusion-Hosted Iron-Titanium Deposits4. Stratiform Marble-Hosted Zinc Deposits5. Stratiform Clastic-Hosted, Copper-Zinc-Silver (Rusty Schist) Deposits.6. Intrusion-Hosted Copper-Nickel Deposits.7. Unconformable Quartz (*-Ankerite) Vein-Hosted Gold-Silver4~Arsenic

Deposits.8. Stratabound Quartz-Dolomite Vein-Hosted, Gold-Copper-Zinc-Lead-

Antimony Deposits.9. Unconformable Calcite Vein-Hosted Lead Deposits

In evaluating regional geology immediate to Lake Township, it is apparent that it is quite complex and variable, in some cases inconsistently documented. The adjoining township southwest, Belmont, and west, Methuen Township, exemplify this. About half of Belmont is underlain by Paleozoic rocks, predominantly limestone with minor basal sandstone and conglomerate. Where underlain by Precambrian rocks of the Grenville Supergroup, predominantly metavolcanics, three distinct mafic to felsic volcanic cycles are assignable with two additional cycles present but incomplete. Deposits are frequent as documented after Bartlett, J.R. et al.

Further evaluation of available information emphasizing adjoining townships reveals a consistent frequency of mineral deposition in various styles within different lithological units. The obvious question of whether the broad area of the Grenville is only host to small, uneconomic mineral deposition or whether there is something being overlooked to get such unusual frequency and variable mineral 'teasers' still remains unanswered.

Moreover, a preponderance of geophysical anomalies which suppose the same geological environment with volcanogenic massive Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag sulphide deposits but economically are worthless themselves may, in fact, be "sulphide

ironstones" or interflows. Unequivocally, a preponderate of Proterozoic cover mayreasonably be supposed.

4.0 VLF EM-16 Survey

A VLF EM-16 survey was completed over grid lines spaced at 100 metres on claim SO-1 150996 and 1150997 on stations at 25 metre intervals. The station used was MSS, located at Annapolis, Maryland and broadcasting at 21 .4 kHz.

4.1 VLF Electromagnetics

This method uses VLF navigation signals as a primary source. The receiver measures the dip angle and vertical quadrature of the resultant magnetic field at the station. The method is capable of detecting weak conductors and has moderate to great depth penetration, but conductive overburden greatly diminishes its capability.

Data are plotted as staked profiles of dip angle and vertical quadrature. Conductor axes are identified where the dip angle crosses from negative to positive. Multiple conductors may distort the strength of the primary VLF-EM field resulting with an incomplete cross-over for a particular conductor. There are fee methods of quantitative Interpretation of the data; conductors for this reconnaissance survey are merely identified and described.

4.2 Field Procedure

A Geonics EM-16 was employed to measure the In-phase and Quadrature components of the EM field. The survey used VLF transmitter MSS at Annapolis, MD., U.S.A. (21 .4kHZ) as a source. The stations were 25m apart and the In- phase (percent slope of the dip angles) and quadrature were measured facing east. The data was hand recorded in a field book, that was later hand plotted in the office. A total of 109 readings were taken on a 5 line flagged grid.

4.3 Geonics EM-16 Specifications

Measured Quantity In-phase and quad-phase components of verticalmagnetic field as a percentage of horizontal primary field, (i.e. tangent of the tilt angle and ellipticity)

Sensitivity In-phase I+/-Quad-phase :+/-40%

Resolution W-1%

Output Nulling by audio tone. In-phase indication frommechanical inclinometer and quad-phase from a graduated dial.

Operating Frequency

Operator Controls

Power Supply

Dimensions

Weight

15-25 KHz VLF Radio Band. Station selection done by means of plug-ins.

On/Off Switch, battery test push button, station selector switch, audio volume control, quadrature dial, inclinometer.

6 disposable 'AA' cells

42 x 14 x 9 cm

instrument: 1.6 kg Shipping: 5.5 kg

4.4 Survey, Results and discussion

See JVX addendum

REFERENCES

Chapman, D.1968: Petrology, Structure and Metamorphism of a Concordant

Granodiorite Gneiss in the Grenville.

Easton, R.M.; Carter, I.R.; Springer, J.S.1986: Mineral Deposits of the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville

Province, Ontario and Quebec, Ottawa. Guidebook #3.

G.A.C. GAG 1986 Special Paper 31, New Prospectives on the 1984: Grenville Problem, The Grenville Province, London, Ontario.

GAG/MAC 1986 Guidebook #15, A New Look at the Grenville Front in Ontario, Ottawa.

1984 #9A710A GAG/MAC Guidebook, Grenville Traverse A, Cross- sections of Parts of the Central Metasedimentary Belt, Ottawa.

O.D.M. Geological Report 54, Geology of Lake Township 1968: by R.K.Laakso, 36p.

O.G.S. Assessment Files, Mining Lands Section

Geoscience Research Grant Program, Summary of Research 1978 - 1979, Miscellaneous Paper 87, p. 104-107.

Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 1987, Miscellaneous Paper 137, p.316-323.

Summary of Field Work, 1980, Misc. Paper 96.

ADDENDUM

REPORT ON GROUND VLP SURVEY, LAKE TWP. SOUTHEASTERN, ONTARIO

On Behalf Of :

ULDIS ABOLINS. 340 Burnet Ave. Willow dale, Ontario M2N 1W4

By:

JVX Limited60 West Wilmot St., Unit #22 Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1M6

Contact: Blaine Webster Telephone: (416) 731-0972 Pax: (416) 731-9312

JVX Ref: 9148 December, 1991

VX

TABLE OP CONTENTS

Page No.

1. INTRODUCTION l

2. LOCATION l

3. SURVEY GRID AND COVERAGE l

4. DATA PROCESSING AND PRESENTATION 3

5. INSTRUMENTATION AND FIELD PROCEDURE 3

5.1 VLP Electromagnetics 35.2 Field Method 3

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4

6.1 North Claim 46.2 South Claim 4

7. SUMMARY 5

TABLES

Table:l Production Summary

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Instrument Specification Sheet Appendix 2: Plates

VX

A REPORT ON A GROUND VLP SURVEY CONDUCTED IN LAKE TOWNSHIP,

SOUTHEASTERN ONTARIO

On Behalf Of

ULDIS ABOLINS

1. INTRODUCTION

Between December 28th and 30th, 1991 JVX Ltd. conducted a Very Low Frequency (VLP) Electromagnetic survey on two claims held by Abe Abolins in Lake Twp., Southeastern Ontario.

The object of the VLP geophysical survey was to find and delineate EM conductors that may be mineralized.

2. LOCATION

The properties surveyed are located approxiniatly 12 km west of highway 62, 24 km north of Madoc, Ontario. The aurvey area l a accessible by a logging road via four-wheel drive vehicle.

3. SURVEY GRID AND COVERAGE

The survey area consists of two separate claims indicated as South Claim {claim no. 1150996) and North Claim (claim no. 1150997). The survey lines strike EW and are 100m apart.

A total of 389 readings were taken over 9.35 line-kin. A detailed listing of the survey coverage follows in Table 1.

VX

LINE

TABLE l PRODUCTION SUMMARY

FROM

NORTH CLAIM

TO LENGTH

TOTAL 4900.0m

NO. READINGS

5400N5350N5300N5200N5100N5000N4900N4800N

2775E2800E2825E2800E2800E2800E2800E2775E

3425E3150E3500E3500E3425E3425E3425E3425E

625.0ro375.0m675.0m700.0m625.0m625.0m625.0m650.0m

2616282926262627

204

SOUTH CLAIM

3600N3500N3400N3 SOON3200N31 DON3000N

TOTAL

2775E2775E2775E2775E2800E2800E2800E

3425E3425E3425E3425E3425E3400E3425E

TOTAL

VLP COVERAGE

650.0650.0650.0650.0625.0600.0625.0

4450.0m

9350.0m

27272727262526

185

389

VX

4. DATA PROCESSING AND PRESENTATION

After the completion of the survey the data was manually entered and stored on floppy diskette, employing an IBM compatible microcomputer. The data was edited and reformatted to conform to the specifications of the Geopack software. The VLP data were ink-plotted as profile plan maps with a Nicolet Zeta drum plotter interfaced to an IBM compatible microcomputer.

A map of each claim block is plotted at a scale of 1:2500, of the idealized grid lines, with profiles and posted values. The interpreted conductor axes are indicated on the maps.

5. INSTRUMENTATION AND FIELD PROCEDURE

5.1 VLP Electromagnetics

This method uses VLP navigation signals as a primary source. The receiver measures the dip angle and vertical quadrature of the resultant magnetic field at the station. The method is capable of detecting weak conductors and has moderate to great depth penetration, but conductive overburden greatly diminishes its capability.

Data are plotted as stacked profiles of dip angle and vertical quadrature. Conductor axes are identified where the dip angle crosses from negative to positive. Multiple conductors may distort the strength of the primary VLF-EM field resulting with an incomplete cross-over for a paticular conductor. There are few methods of - quantitative interpretation of the data; conductors are merely identified.

5.2 Field Procedure

A Geonics EM-16 was employed to measure the In-phase and Quadrature components of the EM field. The survey used VLF transmitter NSS at Annapolis, MD., U.S.A. (21.4kHz) as a source. The stations were 25m apart and the In-phase (percent slope of the dip angles) and quadrature were measured facing west. The data was hand recorded in a field book, that was later entered into an IBM compatible PC for processing.

+J VX

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 North Claim { L4800N lo L5400N )

InspecLion of Ihe VLP, North Claim profile map (plate 2) surveyed by JVX Ltd. reveals three main NS striking anomalies. These anomalies are expressed aa conductor axes A, B, and C and are identified by the Ip-phase component crossing from negative to positive or by a sharp decrease in amplitude, adjacent lo a cross-over, for multiple conductors.

Anomaly A

Anomaly Al is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS, decreasing to the north, from L4800N sta. 2850E to L5100N sta. 2825E.

Anomaly A2 is a moderate/weak VLP-EM conductor trending NS, 25m east of Al, from LSOOOn lo L5100N.

Anomaly B

Anomaly B2 is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS Ihroxigh L5400N sta. 2825E, L5350N sta. 2900E, L5300N sta. 2925E, L5200N sta. 2925E with a questionable response at L5100N sla. 2925E.

Anomaly Bl is a moderate/weak VLF-EM conductor trending NS, 25m east of B2, from L5350N sta. 2925E to L5300N sta. 2975E.

Anomaly C

Anomaly C is interpreted at the east claim edge trending NS from L5000N sta. 3425E to L5100N sta. 3425E.

The VLF-EM conductors are in the proximity of lakes and swamps which gives uncertainly as lo Ihe response from a geological conduclor and thai of Ihe clays associaled wilh lakes. Further geophysical and geological invesligalion is warranled.

6.2 South Claim ( L3000N to L3600N )

Inspection of the VLF, South Claim profile map {plate 1) surveyed by JVX Lid. reveals Iwo main NS slriking anomalies. These anomalies are expressed as conductor axes A and B and are identified by the In-phaee crossing from negative to positive.

Anomaly A

Anomaly Al transectes the north half of the grid striking NS wilh a strong/moderate VLF-EM conduclor, decreasing lo Ihe aoulh from L3600N sla. 3000E, L3500N sla. 3025E and L3400N sla. 3025E..

vx

Anomaly A2 trending NS from L3200N sta. 2950E to L3300N sta. 2950E is a weak Lo questionable VLF-EM conductor.

Anomaly B

Anomaly B transects the entire grid from L3000N sta. 3250E to L3600N sta. 3250E. The VLF-EM conductor is strong through L3600N sta. 3250E to L3500N sta. 3225E, L3400N sta. 3200E and L3300n sta. 3200E. The conductor becomes moderate at L3200N ala. 3225E, questionable at L3100N sta, 3225E, and weak at L3000N sta. 3250N.

The VLF-EM cross-overs, of the South Grid, are significant but, it should be noted that these conductors are coincident with lakes and swamps warranting further geophysical and geological investigation.

7. SUMMARY

The VLF survey revealed relatively strong EM conductors with significant strike length. The two EM conductors of the South Claim are strongest at the north half of the grid, but correspond with the lake shore. The North Claim reveals multiple anomalies at its west that run somewhat parallel to the lake shore. Due to the clays in lakes and swamps responding to EM fields the anomalies warrant further investigation.

Any questions with regard to this report or the interpretation should be directed to the undersigned at JVX Limited.

Respectfully submitted,

JVX Limited

Albert Vickers B.Se. Geophysicist

Blaine Webster, B.Se. President

Appendix l

Specification Sheet

VLF (PLANE WAVE) EM INSTRUMENTS

EMI6On* ot the most popular and widely used electromagnet* instruments, the EUt6 VLF receiver makes UM ideal reconnaissance EM. This can bt attributed to its hett reiubirty. operational Hmptoty. compactness and mutual compatibility with other loconnaissanc* Instruments such as portable magnetometers and iidionuuic (KM- tors.

kTh* VLF mtilnd ol EM surviying. pionMfw) by Cwmcs, has provtn to be a sunpit Ftconomiut mwns ol mapp^g oMtogiul si/ueiu* and laufi incng. The appucabons ai* many and varitd, ranging Irom dccct d*i*cbon ol massivt suipfwu conduciors to UM nduKl dtuction ol precious meuis and radioactive Ooposiu.

FEATURES The EM 16 is the only VLF Instrument that measures the quad phase as well as

the in phase secondary held. Tius has the advantage ol pioviding an additional piece ol dau tor a more comprehensive interpretation and also allows a moie accurau determination ol we Ut angle.

The secondary fields are measured as a (alio lo the primary Uid making the measurement independent ol absolute held strength.

The EUtl Is the only VLF leceiver that can be adapted to measure VLF - resistivity.

SpecificationsMEASURED QUANTITY bvphase and quad phase components ol vertical mag

netic held as a percentage ol horuontal primary held. (I.e. tangent ol the Ut angle and eUipucity)

SENSITIVITY Ifrpnase :xiSW. Ouadphasers 40V.

RESOLUTIONOUTPUT KuOcM) by audio tone. In phase indication Irom mechan

ical inclinometer and quad-phase Irom a graduated dot.OPERATING FREQUENCY IS 2S UU VLF Radio Band. SUUon selection done by

means ol piug-n unis.OPERATOR CONTROLS On/Otl switch, battery lest push button, station selector

twitch, auto mum* control. Quadrature dial, tncUno- meujr.

POWER SUPPLY 6 disposable 'AA' ceUs IMENSIONI OiUilcm EIGHT ' lnsUum*nl:1.ikg

:S.Skg

Appendix 2

Plates

Plate l : VLF-EM Profile Map, North Claim, scale 1:2500 Plate 2 : VLF-F.M Profile Map, South Claim, scale 1:2500

tario31C12NW8682 2.15132 LAKE 300

Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines

November 26, 1993

Mining Lands Branch Section Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: Fax:

(705) 670-5853 (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.15132 Transaction #: W9390.00053

Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development and Mines MacDonald Block, Room M2-17 900 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 1C3

Dear Sir/Madam:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS S01150996 i 1150997 IN LAKE TOWNSHIP

The deficiencies in the original submission have been rectified.

The assessment work credits for the Geophysics(VLF) filed under Section 14 of the Mining Act Regulations have been approved as originally filed.

The approval date is November 24, 1993.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

.LJ/ls

cc: Resident Geologist Tweed, Ontario

v Assessment Files Office Toronto, Ontario

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Min ^txdu Deve^Plment du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

ttat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Acl/Loi sur les mines

Transaction No./N* de transaction

1093^0-00063

Personal inlormation collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used lo maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 169 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A6, telephone (706) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont recueillis en vertu de la Lo) sur les mines el serviront a tenir A jour un registre des concessions minleres. Adressor toute quesiton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar, 4* etage Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoQts directs

Typ*

WageaSalalres

Contractor's and Consultant's FeesDrolls de ('entrepreneur et de ('expert- eonsell

Supplies Used Fournltures utlllsees

Equipment Rental Location de material

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvre

Field Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type

If. f o *'^y

Typ.

Typ.

Amount Montant

•^ /, z'c'it . :1

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

(X4.tf

,

i .i-' :' \ -*,'0f6rt

Note: The recorded holder will be required lo verify expenditures claimed In (his statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

2. Indirect Costs/CoQts indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursemenl des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en (ant que travaux d'evaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourriture el heb.rgem.nlMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation

Description

Type

Amount Monianl

t

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partial des coOts Indirects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20M of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des coats directs)

Tola! Value of Assessmenl Credit Valtur lolals du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable d'evalultion Indirect cotlt) (Tetel de* couU dktcti

Totals Total global

tt Indirect! tdmlMMe*

Note : Le litulaire enregislre sera lenu de verifier los depenses demandees dans le present dial des couls dans les 30 jours suivant une demands a eel effel. SI la verification n'est pas effectuee, le ministre pout rejeier tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation presenters.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1000A of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50*b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50 -

Remises pour depfit

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achdvemont sont remboursos a 100 tto de la valour loiale susmentionnee du crbdil d'evaluation.

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 "to de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valeur tolale du credit devaluation

x 0.50

Evaluation tolale demand*.

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs

Attestation de I'etat des couts

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces

IIIQI If |0 OIIIWUI Ilw 9 * *W9t P **i ** **** **w****i w* w ™-^ f — — — -— -— —— --^.--^----- ,

were Incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown depenses ont 616 engagees pour effecluer les travaux d'evaluationsur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as ___f f--., t v ^ —-, * w ;—Li———(Recorded Holder. Agent, Position In Company)

to make this certification

. l am authorized Et qu'a litre de je suis autorise(litulaire umegisud. represenlanl. posie occupo dans la conipagmo)

a faire cette attestation.

Signature -~'

-' ' '' f . ~

Datu

,// . -.-**l '1/1 i//- k

0212 (04/91)Nola : Dans cello lotniulo. (orsqu'il Oesigne dos porsonnas, lo mascuhn ost uiiliso au tons nuuire.

- Ministry of Northern Development am*

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

140. Ji0P.Transaction Number

. ooo S3

Personal Information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264. f* * C\ Ci

2 1 5 l o ^ . ^- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

Recorded HoWerfs)S?A*/.

Client No./o /o / "7

Address'C/ v ) 3V -

Mining Division Township/Area M or G Plan No.sf //o

Dates Work Performed

From: . . .--cj, ( /V?/To:

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

(/Z-/^ Z'rf-rt- S^re-y ? .14" /C* 6'*\ ,

x-s . j . 1 -

JOT7/RECEIVED

. AUG 1 6 1993 •*'MINING LANDS BRANCH

f/-

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs X.

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted If the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

SPR.urc L.

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side1 certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.

Certification of Work Report

Date Recorded UeMer or Agent (Signature)

nUQiutX 3/^3 <:x^-*"<** c^fcrt~ — -U ' l

1 certify that 1 have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after Its completion and annexed report Is true.

Name and Address of Person Certifying

fy '/C'/'cS /- //*C^-*-:, ^''/C ^X.'s-'iv'/f /-^!~* , A/y/-/^' H"~^, ^/A. ^ Sf.3sJ /t-S/Telepone No. ' Date

j///O/. '~* ^/' " f\~^^y^'t /~-~^/ ( ?,, 5 X.3f: -

Certified By (Signature)

•^ 4/cS^^ i fSZtZ ' V

For orrice use only /'Total Value Cr. Recorded

*|,SUo

Date Recorded

(LA cjqsDeempdjApprow Date

fooo Ste

Mining Recorder

Date Approved

Date Notice (or Amendments Sent

RSnilJHFRN ONTARIO MINING DIVI0inn

RECEIVED

AU3 - 5 1993 AM rM

-liSiMiUiMiSiMiM..*

0041 /rn/oo \

L

f, Q '•O 4

b

li .g

i ir i fgi s^ s jf

^ f f r ^ r t ( r

W \ ty 0 ) \ :'

S* K * x 3A 8

^ j\

3 O s i1 f, f ' r

-A \ i " ioO \

C. ( f t J * HOfc

rt

t H

J 4 s^ \5^

V iff!

QS

^^

|f a

TLE

.3 Sf s

*

l Cre

dits

you

are

cla

imin

g in

this

rep

ort m

ay b

e cu

t bac

k. I

n or

der

to m

inim

ize

the

adve

rse

effe

cts

of s

uch

dele

tions

, ple

ase

indi

cate

from

w

hich

cla

ims

you

wis

h to

prio

rize

the

dele

tion

of c

redi

ts.

Ple

ase

mar

k (*

") o

ne o

f th

e fo

llow

ing:

1.

D C

redi

ts a

re t

o be

cut

bac

k st

artin

g w

ith t

he c

laim

lis

ted

last

, w

orki

ng b

ackw

ards

.

2.

D C

redi

ts a

re t

o be

cut

bac

k eq

ually

ove

r al

l cl

aim

s co

ntai

ned

in t

his

repo

rt of

wor

k.

3.

D C

redi

ts a

re t

o be

cut

bac

k as

prio

rized

on

the

atta

ched

app

endi

x.

In t

he e

vent

tha

t yo

u ha

ve n

ot s

peci

fied

your

cho

ice

of p

riorit

y, o

ptio

n on

e w

ill b

e im

plem

ente

d.

Note

1:

Exam

ples

of b

enef

icia

l Int

eres

t are

unr

ecor

ded

trans

fers

, opt

ion

agre

emen

ts, m

emor

andu

m o

f agr

eem

ents

, etc

., w

ith re

spec

t to

the

min

ing

clai

ms.

Note

2:

If w

ork

has

been

per

form

ed o

n pa

tent

ed o

r lea

sed

land

, ple

ase

com

plet

e th

e fo

llowi

ng:

l cer

tify

that

the

reco

rded

hol

der

had

a be

nefic

ial i

nter

est

in th

e pa

tent

ed

or le

ased

land

at

the

time

the

wor

k w

as p

erfo

rmed

.Si

gnat

ure

Date

Ontario

(Ministry olNorthern Developmentand Mines

Mlnml du Nord

•l des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditttat des couts aux fins du credit devaluationMining Act/Lol sur les mines

Transaction No./N* de transaction

1x393^0-00063

Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority ol the Mining Act. This Information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(a). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 169 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A6, telephone (706) 670-7294.

Les renseignements personnels conlenus dans la prosome formule sont recueillis en vertu de la Lol sur les mines et serviront a tenir a |our un registre des concessions minieres. Adressor toute quesiton sur la collece de cos renseignemenls au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du Developpemenl du Nord el des Minos. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 070-7264.

1. Direct Costs/Couts directs

Type

Wage* Salalres

Contractor's od Consultant's FeesDrolls de ('entrepreneur t de I'expert- oonsell

Supplies Used Foiimltures utilities

Equipment Rental Location de materiel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvre

Field Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Typei-lf -jtff\'*y

Type

Typ*

Amount Montan l

•fi /, *t'x .''r,'

Total Direct Costs Total des couts directs

Totals Total global

/tf4f.0?

,

': '-' ' J '

3r,866.o*

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed In this statement of costs within 30 days ol a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject lor assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

2. Indirect 'Costs/CoQts Indlrects*' Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursemen! des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en lant que travaux devaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourrlture et hebergemenlMobilization and Demobilization MoblllMtion et demobilisation

Description

Type

Amount Montan!

t -

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partlel des coOts Indlrects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couls directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Vsltur totals du credit (Total ol Direct and Allowable d'evalualion Indirect eoiti) fTolil de* couU dlrecli

Totals Total global

K Indirect! MmlMfelM

Note : Le tilulaire enregistre1 sera tenu de verifier (os depenses demandees dans le present olal des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a col effet. Si la verification n'est pas etlectuea, le ministre pout reieter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation presenters.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1000A of the above Total Value ol Assessment Credit.

2. Work tiled three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SO^b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50 -

Remises pour dep6t

1. Les travaux deposed dans les deux ans suivanl leur achbvemonl sont rernboursos a 100 "to de la valeur lolale susmemionnee du cr6dit devaluation.

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 "Vb de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valeur lolale du credit d'evalualionx 0.50 -

Evaluation totale demandee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as (Recorded Holder. Agent, Position In Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de I'etat des couts

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

. l am authorized Et qu'a litre de, mio _______________- jo suis autorisd(lilulaire onregislre. lepresentant. potle occupe dans la conipugnie)

a faire cede attestation.

Signature Oalo

0212 (04711)Nota : Dans cotte lormulo, (orsqu'il designs dos porsonnes. le mosculm ost ulilisd au sons nouue.

CsJ (T) O')

u oLU

O. -

O v

5400 N 5400 N

5350 N

5300

5200 N

5100 N

4800 N

x03

5300 N

5200 N

5000 N

4900 N

CLAIM 1150997

UJ

o o00(XI

UJ

Oo

LU

Oo

LU

Oo

31CI2NW86a2 2.15132 LAKE

(-j L NI ^r CO CO 4D

i

? 5^B

SCALE

SURVEY BY JVX LTD.

DECEMBER 1991Lake

/PO /-SQift'

1:2500 S j./

Twp.i sSfs./f/rz

. PIATE 2

ABE ABOLINSNORTH CLAIM

SOUTHEASTERN M.D., ONTARIO

VLF-EM (21.4kHz) PROFILEPROFILE SCALE : 1 cm = 20 %

VLF STATION : NSS Annapolis, MDGEONICS EM- 16

200

N

Q C/3

Z8

00

E

3000

E

3200

E

3400

E

03 CO 01

o o

w

v ;

O ^

p

O3

ffi t* o O

. - a S

o N

S ^^

w

C/J

O

SOE

HR

C

CO

CD

O O

tn M dd

o M

li l 4

V

00 o

o

UJ I\)

o

o

CjO o o

CO -^

o

o

-co en

o o

CO

CD

-O o

2800

E

3000

E

3200

E

3400

E

LE

GE

ND

-^fa

-g

o'fri

. o

l ,

I-f-

40%

IP

t

-17

True

cr

osso

ver