48
Crossing the Capital, Connecting the UK Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 of 8 Baseline Noise Monitoring Part 1 Report No. 1E0415-G0E00-00001

Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Crossing the Capital, Connecting the UK

Crossrail

Technical Report

Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts

Volume 2 of 8

Baseline Noise Monitoring Part 1 Report No. 1E0415-G0E00-00001

Page 2: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

The preparation of this report by RPS has been undertaken within the terms of the Brief using all reasonable skill andcare. RPS accepts no responsibility for data provided by other bodies and no legal liability arising from the use by otherpersons of data or opinions contained in this report.

Cross London Rail Links Limited 1, Butler Place LONDON SW1H 0PT Tel: 020 7941 7600 Fax: 020 7941 7703 www.crossrail.co.uk

Crossrail

Technical Report

Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts

Volume 2 of 8

Baseline Noise Monitoring Part 1

Final Report

Page 3: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc

CONTENTS PAGE NO

Volume 2

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. MEASUREMENT UNITS AND INDICES 2

3. MONITORING LOCATIONS AND DURATIONS 4

4. MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION 6

5. DESCRIPTION OF MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS BY ROUTE WINDOW 7

6. OTHER SOURCES OF BASELINE DATA 22

7. MEASUREMENT RESULTS 26

Tables

Central Route Section

Table 7.1 Noise Survey Results Summary for 7-Day Monitoring Sites

Table 7.2 Noise Survey Results Summary for 24-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.3 Noise Survey Results Summary for 3-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.4 Vent Shaft Assessment Baseline LA90

Western Route Section

Table 7.5 Noise Survey Results Summary for 7-Day Monitoring Sites

Table 7.6 Noise Survey Results Summary for 24-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.7 Noise Survey Results Summary for 3-Hour Monitoring Sites

Page 4: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc

North East Route Section

Table 7.8 Noise Survey Results Summary for 7-Day Monitoring Sites

Table 7.9 Noise Survey Results Summary for 24-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.10 Noise Survey Results Summary for 3-Hour Monitoring Sites

South East Route Section

Table 7.11 Noise Survey Results Summary for 7-Day Monitoring Sites

Table 7.12 Noise Survey Results Summary for 24-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.13 Noise Survey Results Summary for 3-Hour Monitoring Sites

Table 7.14 Shaft Assessment Baseline LA90

Table 7.15 Effects of Adverse Weather Conditions on Noise Survey Results

Appendices

Appendix A Baseline Noise Measurement Protocol

Appendix B Table of Noise Measurement Locations

Appendix C Calibration Certificates

Appendix D Graphs of Noise Monitoring Results

Volume 3

Appendices Continued

Appendix E Noise Monitoring Report Forms

Volume 8 (part)

Figures

Figures Showing Measurement Locations by Route Windows

Page 5: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 1 17 February 2005

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 This report provides the specialist noise and vibration element for Crossrail, specifically detailing the baseline noise-monitoring programme. This part of the Technical Report (TR) is provided in two parts as Volume 2, Part 1 and Volume 3, Part 2.

1.2 Part 1 presents the complete results of a survey of baseline noise levels at

representative locations along the Crossrail route corridor for the Central, West, South East and North East route sections. These baseline data are required for the assessment in order to assess the extent of impact at receptors along the route. The Central section runs from Paddington to Stratford, where the majority of the route will be in tunnel. In addition, short-term baseline noise monitoring has been undertaken for a number of subsequent utility locations, of which, are included in the Central Route Section. The West section runs from Paddington to Maidenhead, with a Heathrow route. The North East section runs from Stratford to Shenfield; this section will be overground, largely using existing lines. An additional site in Pitsea, Essex, is included within the North East Route chapter. The South East section will run from the Isle of Dogs to Abbey Wood (although the results to Ebbsfleet are included); the line will follow existing surface lines.

1.3 This report describes the types of noise measurements carried out, how locations

were selected, noise units and indices derived from the survey data and the instrumentation used. Other sources of baseline data obtained are also described.

1.4 An individual survey report form is provided in Part 2 for each measurement location

and the results of all the measurements are presented in summary form. Graphs showing the measured noise levels are also provided for the long and medium term monitoring results. Volume 8 of this technical report includes a set of Route Window (RW) plans is provided at 1:5000 scale showing the locations of the measurement positions.

1.5 As stated above, baseline noise monitoring data are needed to assess the extent of

impact by considering the change in noise levels at receptors along the route. Baseline monitoring has been carried out in areas where there may be noise impacts from construction, from the operation of vent shafts and other areas where major infrastructure changes are expected. This will include new sections of surface railway line and modifications to stations and other railway infrastructure. Where Crossrail will only result in additional train services using existing lines with no new infrastructure, baseline monitoring has not been carried out. It is not required in these areas as the assessment of operational noise for these sections will be based on changes in noise level, not on the absolute noise levels.

1.6 This document reports the complete survey information for the Central, West, and

Eastern sections, undertaken between July 2003 and October 2004.

Page 6: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 2 17 February 2005

2. MEASUREMENT UNITS AND INDICES

2.1 The noise survey instrumentation recorded a number of noise scales and statistical indices. Only those units necessary to characterise baseline conditions in relation to the construction and operational noise assessments have been processed and summarised. The following units are reported, which were measured using “F” time response as defined in BS EN 61672: Part1:2003 [1].

i) The LAmax noise level

This is the maximum noise level recorded over the measurement period.

ii) The LAeq noise level

This is the "equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level, in decibels" and is defined in British Standard BS 7445 [2] as the "value of the A-weighted sound pressure level of a continuous, steady sound that, within a specified time interval, T, has the same mean square sound pressure as a sound under consideration whose level varies with time".

It is a unit commonly used to describe construction noise and noise from industrial premises and is the most suitable unit for the description of other forms of environmental noise. In more straightforward terms, it is a measure of energy within the varying noise.

iii) The LA10 noise level

This is the noise level that is exceeded for 10% of the measurement period and gives an indication of the noisier levels. It is a unit that has been used over many years for the measurement and assessment of road traffic noise.

iv) The LA90 noise level

This is the noise level that is exceeded for 90% of the measurement period and gives an indication of the noise level during quieter periods. It is often referred to as the background noise level and is used in the assessment of disturbance from industrial noise.

2.2 The indices have been calculated from the measurement data for various time periods for the purposes of the construction and operational noise assessments, as considered necessary. The various indices and time periods are summarised in Table 2.1. For the baseline data obtained from measurements over 7-days, separate average results have been calculated for weekdays, weekends and from the full 7-day’s data (1-week).

Page 7: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 3 17 February 2005

TABLE 2.1 INDICES AND TIME PERIODS FOR BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS

Noise Index Period Time Period Purpose

16 hour day 07:00-23:00 Operational noise assessment

12 hour day 07:00-19:00 Construction noise assessment

8 hour night 23:00-07:00 Operational and construction noise assessments

18 hour day 06:00-24:00 Noise Insulation Regulations (railways)

6 hour night 00:00-06:00 Noise Insulation Regulations (railways)

LAeq,T

Evening/ Weekend

19:00-23:00 weekdays 13:00-23:00 Saturdays 07:00-23:00 Sundays

Construction noise assessment

LAmax,F Day 07:00-23:00 Operational noise assessment

LAmax,F Night 23:00-07:00 Operational noise assessment

Day 07:00-23:00 Operational noise assessment

Night 23:00-07:00 Operational noise assessment

LA90,T Shoulder Period at end and Start of Crossrail Services

LA90 (21:00-01:30 and 05:30-07:00)

Vent shaft operational noise assessment

LA10,18hour Day 06:00-24:00 Noise Insulation Regulations (highways)

Page 8: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 4 17 February 2005

3. MONITORING LOCATIONS AND DURATIONS

3.1 Baseline noise surveys have been carried out at representative locations along the route. The locations have included dwellings, public open spaces, educational establishments, hotels, other sensitive buildings or land uses and commercial premises that may be significantly affected by the proposals.

3.2 The following measurement durations have been adopted:

• 7-day long term unattended external measurements

• 24-hour medium term unattended external measurements

• 3-hour short term attended external measurements

3.3 The 7-day long-term measurements were carried out at noise-sensitive locations adjacent to proposed major construction sites, such as tunnel portals, station work sites and at other locations of potential significance during the operational phase of the project, such as vent shafts.

3.4 The 24-hour medium-term measurements were carried out at noise-sensitive

locations near to where more minor construction works are proposed, for example platform extensions and at locations potentially affected by operational noise from Crossrail.

3.5 The 3-hour short-term measurements were made at locations where supplementary

data were required. These were either outlying noise-sensitive locations or at locations near to long term monitoring sites. These were locations where the noise climate would differ from that at the long-term site, but would be expected to be dominated by the same noise sources. These measurements were taken either as 3-hour continuous monitoring on a weekday or as a number of 15-minute samples on a weekday, generally over a 3-hour period.

3.6 Long-term and medium-term measurement positions were generally located on

buildings at first floor window height (4 metres) or above. For the Central section, many locations were situated on roofs or balconies of buildings. Short-term positions were generally located at 1.2 to 1.5 metres above ground. Dependent upon site conditions, measurements were taken either 1 metre from the building façade (façade positions) or at free-field positions, at least 3.5 metres from the building façade or other substantial reflecting surfaces.

3.7 To obtain representative noise measurements, weather conditions must be

reasonably dry and calm during the measurement period. Therefore, where necessary, the measurement procedure involved delaying the start of a survey or extending the duration. This enabled the appropriate period of data to be recorded at each location without results being influenced by adverse weather conditions. In some cases, short periods of poor weather may have occurred during the long-term measurements. These are not considered to have had any significant effect on the period average results obtained from the surveys. An assessment that demonstrates this is provided in Section 7 of this report.

3.8 The noise measurement protocol is provided in Appendix A.

Page 9: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 5 17 February 2005

3.9 Measurement locations were identified by consultation and liaison between the Crossrail Consultation Team, RPS and the relevant local authority. Each measurement site is identified by a prefix denoting the local authority in which it falls, followed by a number. Each baseline noise measurement site is identified by a prefix denoting the local authority in which it falls, followed by a number. The local authorities covering the measurement locations and their prefix codes are listed below:

Basildon District Council BA

London Borough of Barking and Dagenham BD

District of Brentwood BW

London Borough of Bexley BX

London Borough of Camden CA

City of London CL

Dartford Borough Council DA

London Borough of Ealing EA

London Borough of Greenwich GR

Gravesham Borough Council GS

London Borough of Havering HA

Hammersmith and Fulham Council HF

London Borough of Hillingdon HL

London Borough of Hounslow HO

London Borough of Islington IS

London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea KC

London Borough of Newham NE

London Borough of Redbridge RB

District of South Bucks SB

Borough of Slough SL

3.10 Table listing all the measurement locations are provided in Appendix B.

Page 10: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 6 17 February 2005

4. MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION

4.1 The following instrumentation has been used for the majority of the noise surveys:

• Rion NL-31 Type 1 Sound Level Meter with RION NH-21 Pre-amplifier and Rion UC-53A ½ inch pre-polarized condenser Microphone; or

• Rion NL-32 Type 1 Sound Level Meter with RION NH-21 Pre-amplifier and Rion UC-53A ½ inch pre-polarized condenser Microphone; calibrated with a:

• Rion NC-74 Type 1 Acoustic Calibrator.

4.2 The following instrumentation has been used for a small number of the noise surveys:

• Bruel and Kjaer Type 2238 Mediator Type 1 Sound Level Meter loaded with

module BZ 7125 and Bruel and Kjaer type 4188 ½ inch pre-polarized condenser Microphone; or

• CEL 268 Type 1 Sound Level Meter with GRAS 40AE ½ inch pre-polarized

condenser Microphone; calibrated with either a

• Bruel and Kjaer type 4231 Acoustic Calibrator; or

• 01 dB Cal 01 Acoustic Calibrator

4.3 The noise measurements for the unattended long-term and medium-term locations

were set up with the sound level meters within water resistant environmental cases. The meters were powered by sealed lead-acid batteries. The microphones were fitted with weatherproof windshields.

4.4 All instrumentation was calibrated both prior to and immediately following each

survey period. Drifts are reported, but no significant instrumentation drifts occurred. A significant drift is defined as greater than 0.5 dB variation from the initial calibration level. Had a significant drift occurred, the instrumentation would have been checked and the measurement repeated.

4.5 All instrumentation is calibrated every two years by an approved body, either

according to the manufacturer’s performance specifications using equipment traceable to national standards or in accordance with BS 7580: 1997 – The verification of sound level meters, Part 1: Comprehensive Procedure [3], as recommended in BS 4142:1997 [5]. Calibration certificates covering all the instrumentation used are provided in Appendix C.

Page 11: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 7 17 February 2005

5. DESCRIPTION OF MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS BY ROUTE WINDOW

5.1 The following text describes the monitoring locations in each route window for each section individually. The locations are indicated on the plans provided in this volume. It should be noted that due to the overlap between windows, sites may appear on more than one plan. Noise Monitoring Report Forms for each monitoring location detailing the survey duration, equipment details and survey set-up are given in Appendix F.

CENTRAL ROUTE SECTION

Route Window C1 – Royal Oak Portal

5.2 The Royal Oak Portal and associated major work sites are included in this route window. There is also a proposed vent shaft north of Gloucester Terrace. Monitoring sites have included 7-day monitoring locations at Westbourne Park Villas (WE01) and Orsett Terrace (WE05), together with three short-term positions (WE02, WE03 and WE04).

5.3 An additional survey location was included at the front facades of Orsett Terrace

(WE31), in order to take account of construction traffic movements along this road. The measurement comprised a shortened 3-hour measurement survey undertaken during the daytime period and a shortened 2-hour survey period during the evening period, between 19:45 hours and 21:45 hours.

Route Window C2 – Paddington Station

5.4 This route window includes the proposed Paddington Central Station worksite. Three, 7-day monitoring sites were selected. These were located in Eastbourne Terrace (WE06), Chilworth Street (WE07) and at the Great Western Hotel (WE08). The local authority subsequently requested an additional 7-day monitoring location at The Royal Lancaster Hotel (WE30), overlooking Hyde Park.

Route Window C3 – Hyde Park & Park Lane Shafts

5.5 A vent shaft and a possible lorry holding area are to be situated in North Carriage Drive on the northern edge of Hyde Park. There is also a proposed vent shaft between the two carriageways of Park Lane. Monitoring sites have included 7-day monitoring locations at properties in Hyde Park Gardens and Hyde Park Place (WE09, WE10 and WE11) and at Avenfield House (WE12), Park Lane. Short-term measurements were also carried out in Hyde Park, near to the North Carriage Drive (WE28).

Route Window C4 – Bond Street Station

5.6 This window includes the proposed Bond Street Station, which includes the proposed Western ticket hall and vent shaft at Davies Street and an Eastern ticket hall and vent shaft at Hanover Square. Three, 7-day monitoring sites and a number of short-term sites were selected. The long-term locations included Gilbert Street (WE13) near the proposed station, 60 New Bond Street (WE16) and 13 Hanover Square (WE17), both situated close to the vent shaft. Short-term monitoring was undertaken at St Anselm’s Place (WE14), South Molton Street (WE15), Hanover Square Gardens (WE18) and Hanover Square (WE19).

Page 12: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 8 17 February 2005

Route Window C5 – Tottenham Court Road Station

5.7 This route window includes the worksites associated with the proposed Tottenham Court Road works. Three, 7-day monitoring sites were selected together with seven short-term positions (WE20, WE21, WE22, WE24, WE25, WE26 and WE29). The long-term sites were located at Godem Court (WE23), Goslet Yard (WE27) and Charing Cross Road (CA01).

5.8 To the east of the site, in the vicinity of the proposed Fisher Street vent shaft, a 7-day

measurement (CA02) and a short-term measurement (CA03) were also undertaken.

Route Window C6 – Farrington Station

5.9 This window includes a possible minor construction site at Jockey’s Fields, just west of Gray’s Inn, where short-term monitoring was undertaken at the Raymond Building (CA04).

5.10 Major construction works will be carried out at the proposed Farringdon Station

worksite. The station has been designed to have Western and Eastern ticket halls, each with associated vent shafts. Four, 7-day monitoring sites and three short-term sites were selected in this area. The long-term locations were at Farringdon Road (IS01), Cowcross Street (IS02), Charterhouse Square (IS04) and Hayne Street (CL01).

5.11 Three short-term sites were also selected, at IS03, IS05 and CL02, within the

Charterhouse Square area.

Route Window C7 – Liverpool Street Station

5.12 This route window includes the worksites associated with the proposed Liverpool Street Station, which encompasses the Moorgate Ticket Hall and vent shaft, the Finsbury Circus worksite, for the main station tunnel and the Blomfield Street vent shaft worksite. Three, 7-day monitoring sites and four short-term sites were identified in this route window. Long-term monitoring was undertaken at the London Metropolitan University (CL04), Finsbury Circus (CL05) and the Great Eastern Hotel (CL08). Supplementary short-term measurements were carried out at Moorfields Highwalk (CL03), Broad Street Avenue (CL06), Liverpool Street (CL07) and Alderman’s Walk (CL09).

Route Window C8 – Whitechapel Station

5.13 This route window includes a work site and vent shaft at Hanbury Street, the Pedley Street worksite and three worksites associated with the proposed Whitechapel Station. Five, 7-day monitoring sites were selected together with seven short-term positions. The long-term locations were located at Princelet Street (TH01), Vallance Road Gardens (TH04), 335 Mile End Road (TH09), Weaver House (TH11) and Bartholomew Square (TH12). The seven short-term positions included TH02 and TH03, within the vicinity of Princelet Street, TH05 and TH06 close to the Durward Street worksite, and TH07, TH08 and TH10 in close proximity to the main Whitechapel Station ticket hall worksite.

Page 13: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 9 17 February 2005

Route Window C8a – Mile End Conveyor Corridor

5.14 This route window includes a worksite associated with spoil handling, storage and disposal, and a conveyor corridor from the proposed track alignment at Pedley Street. No measurements were considered necessary in this route window. Baseline noise levels used for assessment purposes have been estimated based on the locations in Route Window C8.

Route Window C9 – Stepney Green Shafts

5.15 This route window includes vent shafts and worksites at Stepney Green and Mile End Park. The 7-day monitoring sites associated with these activity areas include; Stepney Green (TH14) and Jamuna Close (TH16). Short-term monitoring was undertaken at positions TH13 and TH15, both located in Stepney Green, overlooking the park and proposed worksite compound.

Route Window C10 – Lowell Street Shaft

5.16 The Lowell Street vent shaft and associated worksite is location in this route window. One, 7-day survey was undertaken at Basin Approach (TH25), together with a 3-hour survey undertaken at TH24, located on the pavement of the (A13), Commercial Road.

Route Window C11 – Isle of Dogs Station

5.17 This area includes the proposed Hertsmere Road vent shaft and the Isle of Dogs Station worksite. Two, 7-day monitoring sites were selected, one at Hertsmere House (TH26), adjacent to the proposed vent shaft at Hertsmere Road and the other at Broadwalk Place, off Trafalgar Way (TH28). The location was situated close to the Billingsgate worksite associated with the proposed Isle of Dogs station. No short-term sites were identified in this area.

Route Window C12 – Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts

5.18 Proposed vent shafts will be located at Mile End Park and Eleanor Street. In total three long-term and two short-term monitoring locations were selected within this route window. The long-term locations included Wilcox House (TH18), Fairfoot Road (TH20) and Arnold Road (TH21), with short-term measurements undertaken at Elmslie Point (TH17) and Belton Way (TH19).

Route Window C13 – Pudding Mill Lane Portal

5.19 The Pudding Mill Lane tunnel portal and associated worksite are contained within this route window. Initially, a long-term survey position was proposed at Baldock Street (TH30). However, due to difficulties obtaining access to these properties, an attended short-term survey was undertaken as an alternative means of determining the local noise environment.

Page 14: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 10 17 February 2005

Route Window C13a – Abbey Mills

5.20 Additional baseline noise monitoring was undertaken in this route window as part of the utilities assessment. A number of short-term measurements have been undertaken at the three sites in an area to the south of Pudding Mill Lane. Monitoring was located in a predominately residential area, with an industrial unit located close by. Attended daytime measurements consisted of three 15-minute measurement periods, carried out for three consecutive hours, undertaken at (NE09, NE10 and NE11). Attended night-time measurement were also undertaken at the same locations. In this instance, two 15-minute measurement periods were carried out at NE10 and NE11, with one 15-minute measurement undertaken at NE09. The measurement procedure is representative of the 3-hour measurement period.

Monitoring not Carried Out

5.21 It was not possible to carry out noise monitoring at West India Quay (TH27), due to long-term continuous construction works at the site, which would have made the results unrepresentative of the baseline levels typically experienced in this area.

WESTERN ROUTE SECTION

Route Window W25 – Maidenhead Station

5.22 This route window encompasses the proposed Maidenhead Station improvements, which will include platform extensions and associated track slews, an emergency escape footbridge will also be constructed, to provide exits from the western ends of the platforms. In total, five survey locations were selected in this route window. Noise monitoring consisted of one long-term survey undertaken at Berkshire Lodge (WM04), two 24-hour surveys at undertaken at Brownfield Gardens (WM01) and Brockton Court (WM03), and two, 3-hour surveys undertaken at Boyn Valley Road (WM02) and Hampshire Lodge (WM05).

Route Window W24 – Maidenhead Railway Bridge

5.23 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Route Window W23 – Taplow Station

5.24 This route window includes the proposed Taplow Station improvements. The works proposed at the station include, new gates and ticket machines, improved access to all stopping platforms, improved passenger facilities, improved staff facilities and platform extensions. One, 24-hour and one, 3-hour measurement location were selected in this route window. The 24-hour survey was installed at Greenaways, Station Road, Taplow (SB01), with the 3-hour survey undertaken at SGT Garage, Station Road, Taplow (SB05).

Route Window W22 – Lent Rise

5.25 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Page 15: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 11 17 February 2005

Route Window W21 – Burnham Station

5.26 Three survey locations were selected in this route window to determine the existing noise climate within the vicinity of the Burham Station site. The proposed works at this site include new ticket gates, ticket machines and ticket office, improved platform access, improves staff and customer facilities, platform extensions and improved car parking, drop off points and taxi facilities. The baseline noise surveys consisted of one 24-hour survey and two short-term surveys. The 24-hour survey was undertaken at Sandringham Court (SL01). The two, 3-hour short-term surveys were conducted at Berkley Mews (SL02) and Stanhope Road (SL03).

Route Window W20 – Dover Road and Leigh Road Bridges

5.27 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Route Window W19 – Stoke Poges Lane Bridge

5.28 This route window includes the proposed works at Farnham Road Bridge including parapet works and track lowering and works at Stoke Poges Lane Bridge. Construction works at Stoke Poges Lane Footbridge include parapet modifications and re-profiling of the road. In total, five monitoring positions were selected in route window W19, these included two long-term positions and three, 3-hour measurement surveys.

5.29 The three short-term surveys were undertaken at Salt Hill Way (SL05), Ramgarhia

Sikh Temple (SL06) and Pickford Gardens (SL07). Two long-term surveys were undertaken at Lake Avenue (SL04), located to the east of Farnham Road, and Lansdowne Avenue (SL08), to the east of Stoke Poges Lane.

Route Window W18 – Slough Station

5.30 This route window includes worksites at William Street Bridge, Slough Station, Wexham Road Bridge and Uxbridge Road Bridge. The proposed station works include improved platform access, new Crossrail platforms, improved interchange between existing lines, improved passenger facilities and improved station access. The existing Slough Station footbridge will also be raised to provide clearance of overhead power lines. Four monitoring locations were selected within this route window.

5.31 Two short-term, 3-hour measurement surveys were completed at Thames University

(SL09) and Eastbridge, Victoria Road (SL12). One medium-term, 24-hour measurement survey was completed at Grays Place (SL10) and one long-term, 7-day measurement survey was completed at the façade of Richmond Crescent (SL11).

Route Window W17 – Middlegreen Road, St Mary’s Road and Trenches Bridges

5.32 This route window encompasses several worksites at Langley Trenches Bridge, Langley Church Lane (St Mary’s Road) Bridge and Langley Downs Bridge. Each of the bridges is to be reconstructed to provide adequate headroom clearance. Four measurement surveys were completed in this route window along various sections of the tracks.

Page 16: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 12 17 February 2005

5.33 Two long-term surveys were undertaken within this route window, these included, Halkingscroft (SL13) and Aldenbury Road West (SL16). The survey location at SL16 was installed in the rear garden of 3 Aldenbury Road West, facing onto the railway line. Short-term monitoring was undertaken at Springate Field (SL14) and Maryside, off St Mary’s Road (SL15).

Route Window W16 – Langley Station

5.34 This route window includes the worksite associated with the proposed station improvements at Langley Station. Only one measurement position was required within this route window. A short-term attended monitoring survey was undertaken on the footpath between 67 and 69 Mead Avenue (SL17).

Route Window W15 – Dog Kennel Bridge

5.35 This route window includes the upgrade and reconstruction of the Dog Kennel footbridge and possible widening works to the Chequer Bridge. Two baseline noise survey locations were completed at 1 Checkers Bridge Cottage (SL18) and Bathurst Walk (SB02). The survey durations were 7-day and 24-hours, respectively.

Route Window W14 – Iver Station

5.36 This route window includes worksites associated with Iver Thorney Lane Bridge and Footbridge and improvement works at Iver Station. The area to the south of the station is predominantly residential in nature. Works at Iver Station include the demolition and construction of a new ticket hall building, new access gates and ticket halls, improved platform access, improved passenger and staff facilities, the removal of two platform waiting rooms, the removal of an existing overbridge and platform extensions at the eastern end.

5.37 One 24-hour measurement survey was undertaken in the rear garden at 19 Bathurst

Walk (SB03). In addition, an attended short-term survey was undertaken simultaneously at Beam End, also off Bathurst Walk (SB04).

Route Window W13 – West Drayton Station

5.38 This route window includes the proposed West Drayton Stabling site and worksites for West Drayton Station. For the station works a temporary worksite would be located between the railway line and the Grand Union Canal, with access off Station Approach and the High Street. Three, 7-day surveys were undertaken within this section; Fairway Close (HL06), a field opposite 69 to 74 Merrivale Mews (HL07) and Warwick Road (HL09), with concurrent attended short-term surveys undertaken at Warwick Road (HL08), Knowles Close (HL10) and Fairway Avenue (HL13).

Route Window W12 – Horton Road and Old Stockley Road Bridges

5.39 This route window includes the proposed improvement works and associated worksite at Horton Road and Old Stockley Road Bridges. Old Stockley Road Bridge is located just to the west of Stockley Road Bridge and will either need to be rebuilt in order to provide the necessary head clearance for overhead electrics or demolished altogether. Horton Bridge Road is a foot and cycle bridge, which requires replacing to allow for overhead clearance. Only one noise survey position was deemed necessary within this route window. A 7-day measurement was carried out in Holly Gardens (HL11), close to Horton Road Bridge.

Page 17: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 13 17 February 2005

Route Window W11 – Stockley Flyover

5.40 Stockley Flyover is located south of the Stockley Park development; it is the existing junction for Heathrow Airport and is located within the London Borough of Hillingdon. Six baseline noise survey locations were selected within this route window, they consisted of three long-term surveys, one medium-term survey and two short-term surveys.

5.41 Long-term, 7-day surveys were undertaken at Clevdon Gardens (HL04), Denbigh

Drive (HL05) and Emden Close (HL12). A medium-term 24-hour survey was proposed at Peter Fagon House (HL01). However, due refusal of access, monitoring equipment was installed on the boundary of the site, at a representative location. A short-term, 3-hour measurement location was selected in Burnham Gardens (HL03). An additional short-term survey was required, however, due to access difficulties; monitoring at Dawley Park (HL02) was abandoned.

Route Window W10 – Hayes and Harlington Station

5.42 No measurements locations were considered necessary in this route window.

Route Window W09 – Southall West Sidings

5.43 Two, 24-hour measurement locations were adopted in this route window at the request of the Local Authority. A 24-hour survey was conducted at Advanced Plastics Industrial Unit (EA23), as the site in question may be redeveloped. The second, 24-hour survey was conducted at 159 Queens Street (EA22).

Route Window W08 – Southall Station

5.44 Southall Station is located within the London Borough of Ealing, on the A3005, north of Merrick Road. Works at this site included the construction of a new station building, the construction of a canopy roof over the ticket hall, construction of a new overbridge, the refurbishment of the existing station building, platform extensions and the reconfiguration of the tracks. In order to complete the program of works, several temporary worksites may be located within the vicinity of the station.

5.45 One medium-term and one short-term surveys in this route window consisted of a 24-

hour measurement was carried out at Avenue Road (EA19), with a 3-hour measurement carried out at Milian Road (EA18).

Route Window W07 – Hanwell Station

5.46 This route window encompasses the proposed Hanwell Station improvements, which will include platform extensions and reconfiguration of the tracks. The station is located close to the junction of Church Road and York Avenue, within the London Borough of Ealing.

5.47 Two measurement surveys were carried out within this route window, they consisted

of a 7-day survey carried out at Fernbank, Golden Manor (EA16) and a 24-hour survey undertaken on the site of St Ann’s School (EA17).

Page 18: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 14 17 February 2005

Route Window W06 – West Ealing Station

5.48 West Ealing Station is located at the junction of Argyle Road/Drayton Manor and Manor Road. This route window includes proposed works to the station, with the construction of a new ticket hall, new terminal, new overbridge and the extension of the existing platform. Three monitoring sites were selected in this route window. One long-term survey was undertaken at Manor Road (EA13), one 24-hour survey was carried out at Felix Road (EA14) and one short-term survey was attended at Berners Drive (EA15).

Route Window W05 – Ealing Broadway Station

5.49 This route window includes the proposed improvements and construction works at Ealing Broadway Station. Three temporary worksites are proposed within the vicinity. One, 7-day long-term survey was undertaken at 10 The Mall (EA11). Two, 24-hour surveys were carried out, one at 2 Waldegrave Road (EA09) and the other at 39 Hamilton Road (EA10). One short-term measurement location was selected at 4 Madeley Road (EA12).

Route Window W04 – Acton Main Line Station and Yard

5.50 This route window encompasses the proposed platform extensions at the Acton Main Line Station and track realignment and lengthening at the Acton Yard. Eight survey locations were selected in this route window, including three long-term, three 24-hour and two short-term surveys.

5.51 The long-term surveys were conducted at Acton House (EA02), 151 Lynton Road

(EA05) and Churchill Gardens (EA06). The three, 24-term surveys were selected at 65 Lynton Road (EA04), Oakley Road (EA08) and Queens Road (EA22). The two short-term measurement locations selected in this route window consisted of Lowfield Road (EA03) and Noel Road (EA07).

Route Window W03 – Old Oak Common Dept

5.52 Old Oak Common Depot is located north of, and adjacent to, the Great Western Main Line corridor where it passes alongside Wormwood Scrubs Park. Its northern boundary is defined by the Grand Union Canal and its eastern and western most extents by Scrubs Lane (A219) and Old Oak Common Lane, respectively. This route window includes proposed works to the Depot site, which mainly involve improving the existing tracks, laying new tracks and clearing and constructing a new EWS building. Two baseline noise survey locations were selected within the route window. Two 7-day measurements were carried out at Wells House Road (EA01) and Braybrook Street (HF01).

Route Window W02 – Canal Way

5.53 This route window encompasses the proposed Canal Way Junction upgrade and associated temporary worksites. Canal Way is a complex junction located on the south side of the Grand Union Canal, in the vicinity of Kensal Green Cemetery. Works to the junction would allow Crossrail trains from Central London to access the Relief Lines on the Great Western Main Line corridor, for Crossrail services to Heathrow and/or Reading. A long-term survey was undertaken at Northaw House (KC07). In addition, a short-term attended noise survey was undertaken at Kensal Green Cemetery (KC08).

Page 19: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 15 17 February 2005

Route Window W01 – Portobello Junction

5.54 This route window includes the proposed works to Ladbroke Grove. With Crossrail, part of the existing 6 track between Ladbroke Grove and Subway Junction would be reduced to four tracks to create space on the north side of the railway corridor for the two new dedicated Crossrail lines and the proposed turnback facility.

5.55 In total, six monitoring positions were selected in route window W01, these included

two long-terms and four, 3-hour surveys. The four short-term surveys were undertaken at Edenham Way, off Elkstone Road (KC01), St Ervans Road (KC02), Octavia House (KC04) and Kensal House (KC05). Originally, monitoring at KC04 was meant to be conducted at Manchester Drive, however, access could not obtained and the survey location was therefore repositioned at a representative location. The two long-term surveys were undertaken at Kensington and Chelsea College (KC03) and Barbly Gardens (KC06).

Monitoring not Carried Out

5.56 Several original survey locations were relocated due to difficulties with gaining access to the preferred sites. In most instances, the survey position was relocated to a representative location. However, RPS was unable to get permission to install a noise monitor at Dawley Park (HL02).

Additional Monitoring

5.57 Several additional surveys were undertaken within the west section but these locations do not fall within a specified route window. These additional long-term sites are all within the Chiswick area. They include South Parade (EA20), Valetta Road (EA21) and Chiswick Common Road (HO01).

NORTH EAST ROUTE SECTION

Route Window NE1 – Stratford Station

5.58 This route window encompasses the proposed Stratford Station improvements. Stratford Station is a major transport interchange on the rail network servicing east London off the Great Eastern Road in the London Borough of Newham. The proposals include the utilisation of the existing platforms and tracks for the introduction of Crossrail trains. One long-term survey was undertaken at the Carpenters College and Docklands Youth Centre (NE06) in Gibbins Road. The noise-monitoring equipment was installed on the roof of the building, overlooking the trade entrance of Stratford Station.

Route Window NE2 – Forest Gate Station

5.59 This route window includes the proposed Forest Gate Station improvements. The works proposed at the station include, platform extensions on the Crossrail lines and local realignment of track in the vicinity of the platform extensions. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Forest Gate Station in Forest Lane (NE07).

Page 20: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 16 17 February 2005

Route Window NE3 – Manor Park Station

5.60 This route window includes Manor Park Station, where works will consist of some minor refurbishment of staff facilities and platform extensions. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Manor Park Station in Durham Road (NE08).

Route Window NE4 – Ilford Station

5.61 This route window includes proposed platform extensions at Ilford Station and works at Aldersbrook sidings, located in the London Borough of Redbridge. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Ilford Station at 55 York Road, the location of a doctor’s surgery (RB01).

Route Window NE5 – Seven Kings Station

5.62 This route window includes the proposed works at Seven Kings Station, where several platforms require lengthening to the west to accommodate the proposed Crossrail train movements. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Seven Kings Station in Lombard Avenue (RB02).

Route Window NE6 – Goodmayes Station

5.63 This route window covers the proposed platform extensions at Goodmayes Station and the western part of the Chadwell Heath Freight Loop. A 24-hour measurement location was undertaken in Fenman Gardens (RB03), close to Goodmayes Station.

Route Window NE7 – Chadwell Heath Station

5.64 This route window encompasses the eastern part of the Chadwell Heath Freight Loop and Chadwell Heath Station. The proposed station works involve extending the existing platforms, to accommodate Crossrail trains and associated works, including improvement of staff facilities. Three, 24-hour measurement locations were selected in this route window, all on the northern side of the railway line. These included, Overton Drive (RB04), close to Chadwell Heath Station, Heath Road (BD01) and Burlington Gardens (BD02), near a proposed Crossrail depot location.

Route Window NE8 – Romford Depot (West)

5.65 This route window includes the western part of the proposed main depot located on the line between Chadwell Heath Station and Romford Station, with associated worksites. Eight measurements were undertaken in this area, within the vicinity of the proposed Romford Depot. One long-term survey was undertaken at Ainsley Avenue (HA10). Two, 24-hour surveys were carried out at HA04 and HA05, both close to Crow Lane, and a further 24-hour survey was completed in Jutsums Lane (HA08). Three, short-term measurements at HA06, HA07 and HA09, were undertaken in open recreational areas.

5.66 An additional 7-day survey was undertaken at West Ham Training Ground (BD03), to

the rear of the sports hall.

Page 21: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 17 17 February 2005

Route Window NE9 – Romford Station and Depot (East)

5.67 This route window includes the eastern part of the proposed depot and improvements to Romford Station. Works at Romford Station include upgrading the Station Road approach, improving drop-off and pick up points, refurbishing staff facilities, installation of new lifts, extending the existing canopy, new platform surfaces, demolishing and replacing the existing ticket hall and the extension of the station platforms. In total, six long-term measurement surveys were carried out in NE9, monitoring was undertaken at Beechfield Gardens (HA11), Sheringham Avenue (HA12), Albion Close (HA14) and at three locations within the Oldchurch Hospital site, to the west (HA13), east (HA15) and centre (HA16). One short-term survey was undertaken at Nursery Walk (HA17).

Route Window NE10 – Gidea Park Station

5.68 Gidea Park Station is located east of Balgores Lands and north of Station Road. At this station, the suburban platforms are to be extended; other minor works include refurbishment of staff facilities. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Gidea Park Station, at Eyre Close (HA01).

Route Window NE11 – Gidea Park Stabling Sidlings

5.69 This route window includes the proposed expansion works at Gidea Park Stabling Sidings. Additional sidings are proposed at Gidea Park for overnight stabling of Crossrail trains, to provide stabling for ten trains of 240m in length, together with a turn back siding. A 7-day measurement location was selected at Cambridge Avenue (HA02).

Route Window NE12 – Harold Wood Station

5.70 This route window includes the proposed improvement works at Harold Wood Station. A 24-hour measurement location was selected close to Harold Wood Station at Fitzilian Avenue (HA03).

Route Window NE13 – LB Havering/Brentwood DC Boundary

5.71 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Route Window NE14 – Brook Street

5.72 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Route Window NE15 – Brentwood Station

5.73 The only works proposed at Brentwood Station are platform extensions and associated track slews. A 24-hour measurement location was undertaken close to Brentwood Station at Glamis House (BW01).

Route Window NE16 – Thrift Wood

5.74 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Page 22: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 18 17 February 2005

Route Window NE17 – Shenfield Station

5.75 This route window encompasses the proposed Shenfield Station and Turnback Sidings. At this station, platform extensions are not required but stabling is to be revised and junction layouts altered. Two 24-hour measurement locations were selected close to Shenfield Station at 10 Hunter Avenue (BW02) and 81 Hunter Avenue (BW03).

Route Window R1 – Pitsea Sidings

5.76 This route window encompasses the proposed Pitsea spoil disposal site, located in Essex. Spoil will be transported to this site by rail, where it will be off-loaded, then transported by HGVs along Pitsea Hall Lane to the Pitsea Treatment and Landfill Site. The current assumption is that no additional sidings will be required at this site. Some work to the railhead may be required. A number of short-term measurements have been undertaken at the three sites within the vicinity. Surveys have been undertaken at three sites within close proximity to the worksite, they include, Chestnut Road (BA01), Brackendale Avenue (BA02) and Pitsea Hall Lane (BA03). Attended measurements consisted of three 15-minute measurements undertaken at each of the sites during day and night-time periods. The measurement procedure is representative of the 3-hour measurement period.

Monitoring not Carried Out

5.77 All proposed monitoring was completed within the north east route section.

SOUTH EAST ROUTE SECTION

Route Window SE1 – Blackwall Way and Limmo Peninsula Shafts

5.78 This window includes the proposed Blackwall Way intervention shaft and the Limmo Peninsula vent shaft and associated worksites. The Blackwall Way Shaft will be located along Blackwall Way, adjacent to the Reuter’s Building car park and Virginia Quay Developments. The temporary worksite will consist of an area of undeveloped land bounded by Blackwall Way, the boundary fence of the Toynbee Housing Association and the proposed Blackwall Yard Development. Construction is scheduled to begin in September 2007 for approximately four and a half years. Once completed, the intervention shaft will be completely surrounded by residential developments. The Limmo Shaft will be located on the Limmo Peninsula, which is currently being used as a construction site for the DLR extension. One short-term survey was undertaken at John Smith Mews (TH36), near to the proposed Blackwall Way shaft.

Route Window SE2 – Custom House Station

5.79 This route window includes the proposed Victoria Dock Portal and Custom House Crossrail Station and associated worksites. The portal is to be located between the Royal Victoria and Custom House DLR Stations. An associated worksite will be located in the Excel car park to the south of the rail corridor. Custom House Station is located south of the Victoria Dock Road near its junction with Freemasons Road. The Excel exhibition centre is located to the south with the Royal Victoria Dock beyond. Works include, new Crossrail platforms to replace the existing Silverlink/NLL tracks, new Crossrail station, new ticket hall and modifications to the DLR platform.

Page 23: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 19 17 February 2005

5.80 Two, 7-day measurement locations were selected within this route window. Monitoring took place at Victoria Dock Road (NE01), close to Royal Victoria Station, and at the Flying Angel (NE02), opposite Custom House Station.

Route Window SE3 – Connaught Tunnel

5.81 This route window includes remedial works to be undertaken on the Connaught Tunnel, located between Prince Regent and Silvertown Stations, on the existing North Kent Line. Works are expected to take 10 months to complete. The existing Silvertown station, also located within SE3, would be demolished. Two survey locations were selected within this route window, they included one long-term survey undertaken at the Royal Connaught Apartments (NE03) and one short-term attended survey at Leonard Street (NE04)

Route Window SE4 – North Woolwich Portal and Thames Tunnel

5.82 This route window includes the proposed North Woolwich Portal, Thames Crossing Tunnel, Warren Lane Shaft and associated worksites. The Warren Lane Shaft is located on the corner of Warren Lane and Beresford Street in the London borough of Greenwich. The site is currently occupied by a disused building. The shaft is to provide intervention, emergency intervention and ventilation to the running tunnels. A long-term survey position was installed on the roof North Woolwich Railway Museum (NE05), which is located at the end of the North London Line, close to the proposed tunnel portal location.

Route Window SE5 – Arsenal Way Shaft

5.83 This route window includes the proposed Arsenal Way Shaft (previously called the ‘Sydney Street Shaft’) and associated temporary worksite. The area includes the proposed Arsenal Way Shaft, located to the eastern end of the Woolwich Barracks car park, with industrial buildings to the north and Plumstead Road to the south. A temporary worksite will utilise most of the car park area. One, 7-day measurement was carried out at Gill Court (GR01), in close proximity to a proposed vent shaft location. No short-term surveys were identified in this route window.

Route Window SE6 – Plumstead Portal

5.84 This route window includes the proposed Plumstead Portal, including White Hart Road Bridge and a temporary main work site at Plumstead Goods Yard, including an area of land adjacent to Nathan Way for spoil handling. The portal structures at Plumstead will provide the transition from the running tunnels under the River Thames to the existing North Kent Line surface railway. The existing North Kent Line tracks will be significantly altered as a result of the proposals. Two, 7-day monitoring sites were selected, both to the south of the existing railway line, overlooking the tracks. Monitoring was undertaken at 75 Reidhaven Road (GR02) and 75A Marmadon Road (GR03).

Route Window SE6A – Manor Wharf

5.85 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Page 24: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 20 17 February 2005

Route Window SE7 –Church Manor Wood Station

5.86 This route window includes the Plumstead to Abbey Wood four-tracking construction works. To accommodate Crossrail, the current two track North Kent Line will be upgraded to four track. The inner two tracks will become Crossrail and the outer two tracks will become the North Kent Line. As a result of the track widening, a number for bridges and footbridges will require additional works, these include: a new Church Manorway Bridge footbridge, Eynsham Drive Bridge strengthening and new Bostall Mannorway Bridge footbridge.

5.87 In total, three measurement surveys were carried out within this route window, they

consisted of a 7-day survey carried out at 47 Mottisford Road (GR04), with two 24-hour surveys undertaken at 168 Mottisford Road (GR05) and Abbey Grove (GR06).

Route Window SE8 – Abbey Wood Station

5.88 This route window also includes the Plumstead to Abbey Wood four-tracking construction works and Abbey Wood Station improvements. Abbey Wood Station lies on the boundary between the London Boroughs of Greenwich to the west and Bexley to the east. To accommodate Crossrail, the current two track North Kent Line will be upgraded to four track. The inner two tracks will become Crossrail and the outer two tracks will become the North Kent Line. With the addition of two new tracks, two new platforms are also proposed. The proposed station concourse will span the tracks forming a fully integrated rail, bus, and tram interchange.

5.89 Harrow Manorway Road bridge is located immediately to the east of Abbey Wood

Station. The existing bridge is a multi-span flyover that currently carries the A2041. Proposals involve the need to demolish and relocate supporting spans and strengthen works to the bridge to accommodate the track widening.

5.90 Two, long-term surveys were conducted at Abbey Terrace (GR07) and Wilton Road,

occupied by West End Styles (BX01). With two medium-term surveys conducted at Sedgmere Road (BX02) and Fendyke Road (BX03). One short-term survey was carried out at Dallberg Way (BX04). Initially, the measurement period was 7-days. However, there were difficulties finding a resident to agree to the installation of monitoring equipment on their property, therefore, an attended short-term survey was undertaken concurrently with the 24-hour survey undertaken at BX03.

Route Window SE9 – Belvedere Station

5.91 The current Crossrail scheme terminates at Abbey Wood. However, previous schemes continued to Ebbsfleet, therefore baseline surveys were undertaken between Abbey Wood and Ebsfleet, which are included for completeness. A 24-hour measurement survey was carried out next to Belvedere Station, at the Belvoir Tavern, 36 Station Road (BX05).

Former Route Window SE10 – Bronze Age Way

5.92 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Former Route Window SE11 – Erith Station

5.93 A 24-hour measurement was completed at Cricketers Close (BX06), near to Erith Station.

Page 25: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 21 17 February 2005

Former Route Window SE12 – Slade Green Station and Sidings

5.94 Three monitoring sites were selected in this route window. Two long-term surveys were undertaken at Oak Road (BX09) and Forest Road (BX07), and one 24-hour survey was carried out at Howbury Lane (BX08).

Former Route Window SE13 – West Dartford

5.95 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Former Route Window SE14 – Dartford Station

5.96 A 24-hour measurement position was carried out at The Railway Hotel (DA01), overlooking Dartford Station.

Former Route Window SE15 – Stone Cross Station

5.97 One baseline noise survey was undertaken within this route window; the 24-hour measurement position was undertaken in the rear garden of 2 Orchard Terrace (DA02), which backs onto Stone Crossing Station.

Former Route Window SE16 – Greenhithe Station

5.98 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Former Route Window SE17 – Swanscombe Station

5.99 No measurements were considered necessary in this route window.

Former Route Window SE18 – Ebbsfleet Station

5.100 Two long-term and two 24-hour surveys were selected in this area; they included GS01, GS02, GS03 and GS04. A 7-day monitoring period was undertaken at South Kent Road (GS03). However, the noise environment was dominated by construction activities taking place close to the rear garden of the resident’s property due to CRTL construction works. It was noted that CTRL has a permanent meter installed in both the rear garden of 4 South Kent Road and a property in Springhead Road.

Monitoring not Carried Out

5.101 Monitoring at Station Road (GS01), Ebbsfleet Walk (GS02) and Springhead Road (GS04) was not possible due to continuing construction work taking place for the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Information in regards to the baseline noise environment prior to construction was being sought from CTRL. However, as the scheme now terminates at Abbey Wood, this data is redundant and noise monitoring will no longer be required for these sites.

Page 26: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 22 17 February 2005

6. OTHER SOURCES OF BASELINE DATA

6.1 Baseline noise measurement data have been obtained from the Thameslink 2000 project and from Westminster City Council. These data were obtained to supplement the Crossrail baseline survey data in some areas. However, it should be noted that any daytime noise measurements carried out prior to February 2003 may now not be fully representative due the introduction of the Congestion Charging Scheme. This has resulted in a decrease in road traffic in central London. On this basis and due to the uncertain provenance of data, none of the supplied data were actually used for assessment purposes. However, where appropriate its potential relevance is commented upon.

Thameslink 2000 Data

6.2 Thameslink 2000 (TL2K) has supplied Crossrail with noise monitoring data that were previously obtained for the TL2K project in the Farringdon area. Construction work at Farringdon Station is required for both projects and it is useful for Crossrail to be aware of baseline noise data used in the TL2K noise assessment.

6.3 It is understood that TL2K does not anticipate carrying out any further baseline noise

monitoring in this area and that the revised TL2K Environmental Statement, completed in June 2004, has relied on monitoring data obtained previously.

6.4 This section presents a summary of the TL2K data obtained between 1996 and 2003

and its relevance to the assessment for the Crossrail project.

TL2K Noise Monitoring Reports

6.5 Extracts from the following reports have been received:

• Rupert Taylor. Thameslink 2000. Baseline Noise Levels. Inner Areas Survey Report. 18 November 1997. Report No 311/1 Issue 1 Revision 3. (1997 Report)

• Southwood Associates. Thameslink 2000. Farringdon Station Site Investigations. Baseline Noise Monitoring – Final Report. 16 April 2002. (2002 Report)

• Temple Environmental Consultants Limited. Thameslink 2000. Operational Noise Monitoring. Type A Survey Report (Airborne Noise). (2003 Report)

1997 Report

6.6 The noise monitoring carried out during this period was obtained for use in the 1997 Environmental Statement for the project. The noise monitoring was carried out during August 1996.

Page 27: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 23 17 February 2005

6.7 Noise monitoring was carried out at the following locations.

Address Description of Survey Relevance to Crossrail

The Castle, 34-35 Cowcross Street

24 hour unattended weekday noise survey at the property, facing onto Cowcross Street.

Data relevant when assessing construction noise associated with station redevelopment. No monitoring proposed at this location during current survey. The noise environment at this location is unlikely to have changed significantly during the past 6 years.

20 Farringdon Road (Merryll Lynch)

48 hour survey located on building facing onto northern end of Thameslink platforms.

Data not relevant as no Crossrail works proposed in the vicinity of this building.

Three Compasses, 66 Cowcross Street

3 day survey carried out over a weekend period. Equipment located on façade facing onto LUL and Thameslink lines.

Data relevant for construction noise assessment. Additional data are being obtained at 62 Cowcross Street during 2003, data from two surveys can be compared to evaluate whether the noise environment has changed.

2002 Report

6.8 This report was prepared to re-evaluate the construction noise limits to be applied at potentially affected properties during the construction works, which were due to commence in 2003. The surveys comprised of both attended and unattended noise monitoring carried out during December 2001 and January 2002.

6.9 The unattended noise monitoring data is presented in graphical form and is

potentially difficult to interpret should different time periods be required to those adopted for TL2K. Period noise data have been presented for daytime (08:00–18:00) and night-time (22:00–07:00). The unattended noise measurements have been supplemented with attended night-time measurements, for which the monitoring results have been obtained in tabular form.

Page 28: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 24 17 February 2005

6.10 Noise monitoring was carried out at the following locations.

Address Description of Survey Relevance to Crossrail

9 & 22 Thackery Court, 75 Turnmill Street

Unattended surveys at residential properties located towards the north of Farringdon Station carried out over a period of one week.

Data not relevant. No Crossrail works proposed at northern end of existing station.

61 – 63 Cowcross Street

24 hour weekday survey carried out on roof of building.

Data relevant for construction noise assessment. No monitoring currently proposed at this location.

95 Farringdon Road Attended night-time survey.

Data not relevant. Measurement position at northern end of Farringdon Station.

20 Farringdon Road (Merryll Lynch)

24 hour unattended noise survey at same location as that used for 1996 survey.

Data not relevant, as no Crossrail works proposed in the vicinity of this building.

Flats on Corner of Greville Street and Farringdon Road

Attended night-time survey

Data relevant if night-time works proposed at Farringdon. The properties are opposite Greville Street and may potentially be affected by construction.

2003 Report

6.11 This report was prepared to assess the potential impacts arising from the operation of the TL2K project and to enable a comparison with calculated noise levels for validation purposes.

6.12 Measurements of train pass-bys were made at the rear façade of 64-65 Cowcross

Street facing onto the railway over a midweek daytime period to enable the period noise levels to be determined from the various sources. Only event data is presented.

6.13 The data are not expected to be relevant for use in the Crossrail assessment as

currently envisaged.

Westminster City Council Data

6.14 The following sets of monitoring results have been received:

• Weekend measurement at Weighhouse Street, 8th-11th February 2002

• Night-time measurement at Rathbone Place, 30th June 2001

• Night-time measurement at Vere Street, 26th–27th October 2001

• Measurements at front and rear of Brewers Court, Westbourne Terrace, 28th-31st March 2003

• Summary of Soho Noise Survey, June 2001–August 2001

Page 29: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 25 17 February 2005

Weighouse Street Data

6.15 This location is near to a proposed vent shaft site and could be of relevance.

Rathbone Place

6.16 This location is to the north of the proposed alignment. Therefore, the data are unlikely to be relevant to the assessment. Vere Street

6.17 This location is distant from the proposed alignment. Therefore, the data are unlikely to be relevant to the assessment.

Brewers Court Data

6.18 This survey was carried out both at the front and the rear of the building. The front is exposed to traffic noise and the rear is exposed to railway noise and traffic noise. The location is near to Paddington Station and the data may therefore be relevant.

Soho Noise Survey

6.19 Tabulated results have been provided for forty locations. Details of the locations that may be relevant are summarised in the following table.

Westminster Site Reference Address Relevance to Crossrail

E1 Wardour Street/Hollen Street Near to Vent Shaft site

E3 Carlisle Street/Dean Street Near to Vent Shaft site

E4 Soho Square Near proposed Tottenham Court Road Station

E5 Soho Street/Oxford Street

Near proposed Tottenham Court Road Station

E6 Charing Cross Road/Oxford Street

Near proposed Tottenham Court Road Station

E7 Manette Street Near proposed Tottenham Court Road Station & Vent Shaft

Page 30: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 26 17 February 2005

7. MEASUREMENT RESULTS

7.1 Summaries of the results from each set of monitoring sites, for each individual section, are given in tabular form as follows:

• 7-day monitoring sites

• 24-hour monitoring sites

• 3-hour monitoring sites

7.2 All levels reported in the corresponding tables have been corrected for façade locations. However, in some circumstances the actual measured noise levels have been left as free-field, to account for the nature of the monitoring location, such as open areas. It is specified in the tables whether a measurement was conducted at a free-field (at least 3.5m from any reflecting surface, other than the ground) or façade location.

7.3 Graphs of the main noise indices against time are provided in Appendix D for each of

the 7-day and 24-hour monitoring sites. All graphs are based on the actual measured noise levels. The results have not been normalized to façade or free-field conditions, but present the actual measured noise levels.

7.4 Tables providing the vent shaft assessment baseline noise levels for the Central and

South East Route Sections are included as 7.4 and 7.14, respectively.

Effects of Adverse Weather Conditions

7.5 Due to adverse weather conditions, a number of surveys were extended at several locations, to ensure that measurements were made over the required period, which were not unduly affected by adverse weather conditions. For three such survey locations, an assessment has been carried out of the effects of poor weather conditions on the resulting noise levels.

7.6 Table 7.4 presents the results of this analysis which shows the difference between one

week averages of LAeq and LA90 and maximum values of LAmax, comparing the first week of ‘poor’ weather with the second week of ‘good’ weather for each position.

7.7 Considering whole decibels, a difference of 2 dB or more in LAeq or LA90 would be

regarded as significant between the ‘good’ and ‘poor’ weather data sets. For LAmax, a difference of 5 dB or more would probably be considered significant. It can be seen from the results that the only significant differences were for the evening (19:00 to 23:00) and night-time (23:00 to 07:00) LA90 values for Arnold Road (TH21).

7.8 This analysis indicates that only severe conditions such as snow are likely to effect

survey results and only when these conditions prevail over most of the survey period. The results at the other two positions rain and/or wind show only very marginal differences in LAeq and LA90 values when averaged over a week. These findings justify the general approach taken for the 7-day survey that short periods of ‘poor’ weather would not significantly affect the survey results.

Page 31: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

JAE2748 N&V TechRep Vol2 - Baseline Pt1 Final.doc 17 February 2005

REFERENCES 1. British Standards Institution. British Standard EN 61672: Electroacoustics - Sound

Level Meters, Part 1. Specifications, 2003. 2. British Standards Institution. British Standard 7445: Description and Measurement of

Environmental Noise, Part 1. Guide to Quantities and Procedures, 1991. 3. British Standard Institution. British Standard 7580: Specification for the verification of

Sound Level Meters, Part 1. Comprehensive Procedure, 1997. 4. British Standard Institution. British Standard 4142: Method for rating Industrial Noise

Affecting Mixed Residential and Industrial Areas, 1997.

Page 32: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

TABLES

Page 33: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

APPENDIX A

Baseline Noise Measurement Protocol

Page 34: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Noise Measurent Protocol.doc 1

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING

MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL

Introduction The noise and vibration impacts associated with the construction and operation of Crossrail are potentially significant and will be assessed as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment. They will be reported within the Environmental Statement that will be submitted in support of an application for powers to construct the railway. The noise impact assessment for both construction and operation will take account of current ambient noise levels (and background noise levels around vent shaft sites). This requires the collection of baseline noise data at a representative number of sensitive receptors along the route and it is proposed to obtain these data through a programme of noise surveys. Types of Noise Monitoring Baseline noise surveys will be carried out at representative locations along the route. These will be carried out in the gardens of private properties, in public open spaces and in the grounds of schools, hospitals, and libraries and at any other sensitive buildings or land uses. To provide representative data and to robustly provide appropriate levels for both the day, evening and night-time periods, the following measurement types will be adopted: • 7-day/long-term unattended external measurements at key representative locations

along the route; • 24-hour/medium-term unattended external measurements at representative locations

along the route; • 3-hour/short term attended external daytime measurements at representative locations

along the route; • Short-term attended external night-time measurements at special locations along the

route (possible requirement to check design criteria for vent shaft sites, auto-transformer stations or other items of plant of a fixed, industrial nature); and

• Short-term attended internal measurements, day, evening or night, at sensitive buildings along tunnelled sections of the route – these may be required to establish existing ground or airborne noise levels in areas such as theatres, recording studios and other areas/buildings requiring low ambient noise levels and sensitive to noise impacts.

Equipment to be Used The measurements will be taken with sound level meters of various types either powered by internal batteries or external sealed lead acid batteries. Some of the surveys may need to be carried out at elevated positions using poles to mount the microphones or from balconies or other rooftop locations. For all but the 3-hour/short term survey types, the surveys will be set up by one or two members of the noise team and then left to be picked up at the end of the monitoring period designated for the site.

Page 35: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Noise Measurent Protocol.doc 2

An example of the noise monitoring equipment used for the unattended measurements is as indicated on the following photograph. The equipment comprises of two parts: a waterproof box (approx. dimensions 43 x 33 x 16 cm, weighing approx. 10kg), which houses a sound level meter and batteries to power the equipment; and a microphone and windshield, which are attached to a metal pole. The batteries are sealed lead acid type, which are approved for transportation by aircraft and are guaranteed not to leak. Installation of Equipment The microphone and windshield will generally be attached to either a metal pole or tripod approximately 1.5 metres high, with the microphone connected to the sound level meter using a cable. Equipment installations are expected to be one of the following types. Façade position at upper floor The microphone will be positioned 1.0 metre from the building façade using one of the following methods:

• Microphone mounted on a pole protruding through window, with a box containing the sound level meter within building.

• Microphone mounted on a wooden frame placed out of a window, with a box containing the sound level meter within the building.

• Box containing a sound level meter placed on a balcony with a microphone mounted on the side pole attachment.

• Box containing a sound level meter positioned on the ground with a microphone attached pole at least 4 metres high to reach first floor level.

Roof top position The box containing the sound level meter with attached microphone pole will be placed on a flat roof. These positions will generally be free-field locations at least 3.5 metres from reflecting walls. Ground level positions These types of installation will generally be used only for short-term attended measurements. Either the box containing the sound level meter will be placed on the ground, with an attached microphone pole 1.5 metres high, or the sound level meter will be mounted directly on a tripod, such that the microphone will be at a height of 1.2 to 1.5 metres. Where possible the microphone will be located 1.0 metre from the building facade. At locations away from buildings or at positions where it is not possible to measure at the facade, free-field positions will be used. In this case the microphone will be positioned at least 3.5 metres from building facades or other reflecting surfaces apart from the ground.

Page 36: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Noise Measurent Protocol.doc 3

Weather Conditions Noise monitoring will be carried out where possible during periods when weather forecasts indicate good weather conditions for the duration of the monitoring, i.e. generally dry with average light winds (average wind speed less than 5 m/s), and no significant precipitation. Noise monitoring will not be valid if carried out during high winds, as higher wind speeds influence the measured levels and invalidate the results. It may be necessary to extend the monitoring period if poor weather conditions were to occur during a period of monitoring. The monitoring at that location would be extended to obtain the required number of valid days data. Risks For each measurement location, consideration will be given to possible health, safety and security risks during the installation, operation and removal of the noise monitoring equipment. Items to consider may include:

• Risks to personnel installing the equipment due to, for example, working at height, restricted access, hazards from road traffic.

• Risks to members of the public, occupiers of buildings from tripping over the equipment or being injured by unsecured equipment falling on persons and causing injury.

• Security of the equipment from theft and vandalism.

Page 37: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

APPENDIX B

Table of Noise Measurement Locations

Page 38: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Table of Noise Measurement Locations – CENTRAL ROUTE SECTION

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50013 WE01 93 Westbourne Park Villas X

50013 WE02 Torquay Street X

50013 WE03 Clifford Court, Westbourne Park Villas X

50013 WE04 Bourne Terrace X

50012 WE05 Orsett Terrace X

50012 WE06 Telstar House, Eastbourne Terrace X

50012 WE07 16 Chilworth Street X

50012 WE08 Great Western Hotel X

50047 WE09 30 Hyde Park Gardens X

50047 WE10 11 Hyde Park Gardens X

50047 WE11 Falmouth House X

50048 WE12 Avenfield House X

50049 WE13 48 Gilbert Street X

50049 WE14 25 St Anselm's Place X

50049 WE15 18 South Molton Street X

50049 WE16 68 New Bond Street X

50049 WE17 13 Hanover Square X

50049 WE18 Hanover Square Garden X

50049 WE19 Hanover Square (Lloyds TSB) X

50050 WE20 23 Great Chapel Street X

50050 WE21 Dean Street X

50050 WE22 18 Great Chapel Street X

50050 WE23 Godem Court (West End Hostel) X

50050 WE24 16 Soho Square X

50050 WE25 Falconberg Mews X

Page 39: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50050 WE26 St Patrick’s RC Church X

50050 WE27 Goslet Yard (The Royal George Public House) X

50047 WE28 Hyde Park X

50050 WE29 Newman Street X

50049 WE30 The Royal Lancaster Hotel X

50012 WE31a Orsett Terrace (front Façade) X 3-hour Daytime Survey.

50012 WE31b Orsett Terrace (front Façade) X 2-hour Night-time Survey.

50050 CA01 138 Charing Cross Road X

50051 CA02 8 Southampton Row (North Facade) X

50051 CA03 Proctor Street X

50051 CA04 5 Raymond Buildings X

50053 IS01 Cardinal Tower, Farringdon Street X

50053 IS02 64-65 Cowcross Street X

50053 IS03 79 Charterhouse Street X

50054 IS04 99 Charterhouse Square X

50054 IS05 33 Charterhouse Square X

50054 CL01 Hayne Street X

50054 CL02 Lindsey Street X

50055 CL03 Moorfields Highwalk X

50055 CL04 London Metropolitan University X

50055 CL05 Garden House, 18 Finsbury Circus X

50055 CL06 Broad Street Avenue X

50055 CL07 100 Liverpool Street X

50055 CL08 Great Eastern Hotel X

50055 CL09 Alderman's Walk X

50056 TH01 51 Princelet Street X

50056 TH02 65 Hanbury Street X

Page 40: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50056 TH03 56/58 Princelet Street X

50063 TH04 Vallance Road Gardens X

50063 TH05 1 Granary Road X

50063 TH06 Swanlea School, Durward Street X

50063 TH07 10 Brady Street X

50063 TH08 Grindall House, Darling Row X

50063 TH09 333 Mile End Road X

50063 TH10 1 Cambridge Heath Road X

50057 TH11 Weaver House X

50057 TH12 10 Bartholomew Square X

50064 TH13 120 Stepney Green X

50064 TH14 58 Stepney Green X

50064 TH15 Sir John's Cass's Secondary School X

50065 TH16 Jamuna Close X

50066 TH17 Elmslie Point X

50066 TH18 29 Wilcox House X

50066 TH19 61 Whitethorn Street X

50067 TH20 13 Fairfoot Road X

50067 TH21 38 Arnold Road X

50072 TH24 697 Commercial Road X

50072 TH25 93 Basin Approach X

50073 TH26 Barclays Bank (Hertsmere House) X

50074 TH27 West India Quay (new apartments) X Monitoring not complete.

50074 TH28 331 Broadwalk Place (off Trafalgar Way) X

50060 TH30 Baldock Road X Originally a 7-day survey position.

~ NE09a Leggatt Road/Claypole Road (P1) X Daytime Survey.

~ NE09b Leggatt Road/Claypole Road (P1) X Night-time Survey.

Page 41: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

~ NE10a Riverside Road/Bay Road (P3) X Daytime Survey.

~ NE10b Riverside Road/Bay Road (P3) X Night-time Survey.

~ NE11a Riverside Road/Mill Meads (P2) X Daytime Survey.

~ NE11b Riverside Road/Mill Meads (P2) X Night-time Survey.

Page 42: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Table of Noise Measurement Locations – WESTERN ROUTE SECTION M

ap R

efer

ence

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50009 HL01 Peter Fagon House Boundary, Dawley Road X Monitoring position relocated.

50009 HL02 Dawley Park X Monitoring not complete.

50010 HL03 44 Burnham Gardens X

50010 HL04 33 Clevedon Gardens X

50010 HL05 28 Denbigh Drive X

50121 HL06 3 Fairway Close X

50121 HL07 69-74 Merrivale Mews X

50122 HL08 19-21 Warwick Road x

50122 HL09 77 Warwick Road X

50122 HL10 72-75 Knowles Close x

50122 HL11 26 Holly Gardens X

50125 HL12 28 Emden Close (rear of properties face Stockley Road) X

50121 HL13 138 Fairway Avenue X

50112 EA01 167 Wells House Road X

50114 EA02 Acton House Boundary X

50114 EA03 52 Lowfield Road X

50115 EA04 65 Lynton Road X

50115 EA05 151 Lynton Road X

50115 EA06 8 Churchill Gardens X

50115 EA07 273 Noel Road X

50116 EA08 3 Oakley Road X

50116 EA09 10 Waldegrave Road X

50116 EA10 39 Hamilton Road X

50000 EA11 10 The Mall X

50000 EA12 4 Madeley Road X

50001 EA13 30 Manor Road X

Page 43: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50002 EA14 38 Felix Road X

50002 EA15 55 Berners Drive X

50003 EA16 Fern Bank, Golden Manor X

50003 EA17 St Ann’s School X

50005 EA18 15 Milian Road X

50005 EA19 Avenue Road X

50097 EA20 6 South Parade X Additional survey location. Outside RW.

50095 EA21 29A Valetta Road X Additional survey location. Outside RW.

50009 EA22 159 Queens Road X Additional survey location.

50009 EA23 Advanced Plastics X Additional survey location.

50014 KC01 1 Edenham Way (Elkstone Road) X

50014 KC02 83 St Ervans Road X

50014 KC03 Kensington & Chelsea College X

50015 KC04 Octavia House X Monitoring position relocated.

50015 KC05 38 Kensal House X

50015 KC06 15 Barlby Gardens X

50016 KC07 Northaw House X

50016 KC08 Kensal Green Cemetery X

50096 HO01 Flat 2, 1 Chiswick Common Road X Outside RW.

50093 HF01 68 Braybrook Street X Outside RW.

50104 SB01 Greenaways, Station Rd, Taplow X

50118 SB02 95 Bathurst Walk X

50119 SB03 19 Bathurst Walk X

50119 SB04 Beam End (Bathurst Walk) X

50104 SB05 SGT Garage, Station Road, Taplow X

50107 SL01 101 Sandringham Court X

50107 SL02 11 Berkley Mews X

Page 44: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50107 SL03 82 Stanhope Road X

50110 SL04 57 Lake Avenue X

50110 SL05 33 Salt Hill Way X

50111 SL06 Ramgarhia Sikh Temple X

50111 SL07 36-43 Pickford Gardens X

50111 SL08 59 Lansdowne Avenue X

50112 SL09 Thames University X

50112 SL10 61A Grays Place X

50113 SL11 14 Richmond Crescent X

50113 SL12 101 Eastbridge, Victoria Road X

50114 SL13 75 Halkingscroft X

50115 SL14 45 Springate Field X

50115 SL15 2 Maryside X

50115 SL16 3 Aldenbury Road West X

50116 SL17 67-69 Mead Avenue X

50117 SL18 1 Chequers Bridge Cottages X

50100 WM01 51 Brownfield Gardens X

50100 WM02 189/191 Boyn Valley Road X

50101 WM03 Brockton Court X

50101 WM04 Berkshire Lodge X

50101 WM05 1-6 Hampshire Lodge X

Page 45: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Table of Noise Measurement Locations – NORTH EAST ROUTE SECTION M

ap R

efer

ence

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50017 NE06 The Carpenter's and Docklands Youth Centre X

50019 NE07 138 Forest Lane X

50020 NE08 22 Durham Road X

50022 RB01 55 York Road (Dr Thurairajah’s Surgery) X

50024 RB02 22 Lombard Avenue X

50026 RB03 58 Fennan Gardens X

50027 RB04 52 Overton Drive X

50027 BD01 2 Heath Road X

50028 BD02 30 Burlington Gardens X

50028 BD03 West Ham Training Ground X

50033 HA01 5 Eyre Close X

50035 HA02 12 Cambridge Avenue X

50037 HA03 15 Fitzilian Avenue X

50029 HA04 218 Crow Lane (rear adjacent to Vignoles Road) X

50029 HA05 218 Crow Lane X

50029 HA06 Westland Playing Field (Properties) X

50029 HA07 Westland Playing Field (Railway) X

50030 HA08 91 Jutsums Lane X

50030 HA09 Jutsums Recreation Ground X

50030 HA10 11A Ainsley Avenue X

50030 HA11 47 Beechfield Gardens X

50030 HA12 49 Sheringham Avenue X

50031 HA13 Oldchurch Hospital (western) X

50031 HA14 12 Albion Close X

50031 HA15 Oldchurch Hospital (eastern) X

50031 HA16 Oldchurch Hospital (central) X

Page 46: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

Long

-term

(1

-wee

k)

Med

ium

term

(24-

hour

s)

Shor

t-Ter

m

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50031 HA17 3 Nursery Walk X

50042 BW01 28 Glamis House X

50046 BW02 10 Hunter Avenue X

50046 BW03 81 Hunter Avenue X

~ BA01a 102-116 Chestnut Road X Daytime Survey

~ BA01b 102-116 Chestnut Road X Night-time Survey

~ BA02a 107 Brackendale Road X Daytime Survey

~ BA02b 107 Brackendale Road X Night-time Survey

~ BA03a Pitsea Hall Lane X Daytime Survey

~ BA03b Pitsea Hall Lane X Night-time Survey

Page 47: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Table of Noise Measurement Locations – SOUTH EAST ROUTE SECTION M

ap R

efer

ence

Loca

tion

Address

(1-w

eek)

(24-

hour

s)

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50074 TH36 John Smith Mews X

50075 NE01 246 Victoria Dock Road X

50076 NE02 The Flying Angel X

50077 NE03 15 Royal Connaught Apartments X

50078 NE04 2A Leonard Street X

50078 NE05 North Woolwich Railway Museum X

50079 GR01 Gill Court X

50080 GR02 75 Reidhaven Road X

50080 GR03 75A Marmadon Road X

50081 GR04 47 Mottisfont Road X

50081 GR05 168 Mottisford Road X

50082 GR06 71 Abbey Grove X

50082 GR07 19 Abbey Terrace X

50082 BX01 Wilton Road (West End Styles) X

50082 BX02 14 Sedgmere Road X

50082 BX03 85 Fendyke Road X

50082 BX04 Dallberg Way X Originally a 7-day survey position.

50083 BX05 Station Road (The Belvoir Tavern) X

50084 BX06 Cricketers Close, Bronze Age Way X

50085 BX07 36 Forest Road X

50086 BX08 126 Howbury Lane X

50086 BX09 30 Oak Road X

50087 DA01 The Railway Hotel X

50088 DA02 4 Orchard Terrace X

50089 GS01 25 Station Road X Monitoring not complete.

50090 GS02 31 Ebbsfleet Walk X Monitoring not complete.

Page 48: Crossrail Technical Report Assessment of Noise and Vibration Impacts Volume 2 …74f85f59f39b887b696f-ab656259048fb93837ecc0ecbcf0c557.r23.cf… · 2015-01-27 · Volume 2 of 8 Baseline

Map

Ref

eren

ce

Loca

tion

Address

(1-w

eek)

(24-

hour

s)

(3-h

ours

)

Comments

50090 GS03 4 South Kent Avenue X

50091 GS04 54 Springhead Road X Monitoring not complete.