Upload
navanitamganeson
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The first highlighted critique was that Jean Piaget did not include the influence
of environment in his cognitive development stages. Based on my observation in
school based experience, I realised that it is true enough that the influence of
environment on child development is very high. After interviewing the class teachers
we got to know that peer pressure on students plays a vital role in the kids’
achievement. According to the counsellor, most problematic students are from
broken family. Their parents did not take any initiative to look after them, thus their
cognitive development is affected. Piaget did not take into account the individual
differences of children, or the differences caused by heredity, culture and education.
Second critique says that Piaget looked down on kids’ ability. According to
him, kids aged between 7 till 11 are able to only think logically to 1 certain level and
they can’t solve complex problems like “A is longer than B; B is shorter than C: which
is the shortest?” there are certain students who are able to answer it right with the
correct explanations. He also said that kids in this stage are not able to do abstract
thinking. The current syllabus highlights on abstract thinking through subjects like
science and maths even from standard one. By solving logical problems in science
and maths, their thinking skills will develop much faster than expected.Many
researches also proved that children posses many abilities before the age Piaget
predicted.
The other critique was on jean Piaget also did not discuss about the right side
of the brain. He did not include things such as art, music or any other activity got to
do with creativity. In my point of view, after discussing with few students and
teachers, we found out that creativity in classroom is very important. Most
pedagogical skills also stresses on creativity, even the teachers are constantly trying
new methods to help the kids to further understand what they are learning. With the
help of music, art and more kids get to understand things faster than expected. Jean
Piaget talked about cognitive development only based on chalk and talk method.
REFLECTION
After the 1 week of school based experience, i gained many new knowledge
based on child development and found out many critiques on Jean Piaget’s theory
were right. We conducted many activity based on the theory and collected data
based on the theory. We also interviewed as many teachers, students and workers
as possible to gain better information on the attitude of the students and their
development. All this helped us in gaining more experience.
From all the observation I found out that not all theories are fully applicable to
every individual. For example, Jean Piaget’s theory is applicable only for few
students in that school. The first class students have developed much more than
what is said for the student to have in concrete operational stage. If this theory were
to be applied to every student in the school it might slow down the process of
teaching and learning.
Factors effecting the development of a student are something that I should
know as a future teacher so that the teaching and learning process takes place
smoothly. Malaysian education system or the implication of KSSR on the students
has given a great impact on the cognitive development of students.