27
CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many The idea is to help identify which of these interrelated task are the CRITICAL ones. Any change in these ‘critical’ tasks will have a significant impact* on the overall project * “impact”, relates firstly to time delays in this context

CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS

aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS

DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks

The idea is to help identify which of these interrelated task are the CRITICAL ones. Any change in these ‘critical’ tasks will have a significant impact* on the overall project

* “impact”, relates firstly to time delays in this context

Page 2: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

The general ideaBUILDING A BRIDGE

Lots of interrelated tasks eg

To build the bridge you need both the passway and the base.

They are in fact interrelated by by TIME. To build the passway you FIRST have to build the base.

Any delay in the building of the base, is going to cause a delay in the building of the passway

Building of the base is a critical activity

Page 3: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Don’t copy any of these down !

Page 4: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

THE CRITICAL PATHWAY is made up of NODES.

Node number[in order of the network]

Earliest Start Time

Latest Finishing Time

Activity / task

Duration of activity

A node for each independent activity/task

On the very first node these will both be ZERO

For the preceding task

For this task

= EST of following node - Duration of current activity

Page 5: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

For node 5 the Latest Finishing Time [for activity D & E] is 10. They must both be finished by the 10th week or else the Final Finishing Time will be delayed. This makes sense because if the activity F cannot be started until the 11th week and takes 1 week itself, the Final Finishing Time will be week 12! Therefore all activities preceding Node 5 must be finished by week 10 at the latest. It can be calculated by the “EST of node 6 (11) – Duration of F (1) = 10”

Page 6: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Node number[in order of the network]

Earliest Start Time

Latest Finishing Time

Activity / task

Duration of activity

For the preceding task

For this task

= EST - Duration

The LFT [for activity 4] recorded in Node 8 will be the same as the EST in Node 8 because there is no following node and no activity

The EST means ‘what is the earliest the ‘end’ can start’ and will be : the EST of node 7 + Duration of Activity 4

The activity of the final node is not shown as it is the ‘end’

Page 7: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Lets try a simple example

You cannot leave the classroom until you have

finished your work and tidied up

0

0

a. Finish work

30 mins

30

30

b. Tidy up

7 mins

37

37

ESTs & LFTs are the same because this is a simple example with no parallel tasks

Page 8: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Lets try one that’s a little harder

You cannot leave the classroom until you have all

finished your work, girls should then tidy up and put up the

chairs while guys put away the laptops

0

0

a. Finish work

30 mins

30

30

b. Tidy up

7 mins

45

45

37

39

c. clear laptops

15 mins

d. Put up chairs

6 mins

EST’s

Duration of task is the next issue to identify…

1 : same as before = 0

2 : same as before = 30

3 : 30 + 7 = 37

4: 37 + 6 = 43 or 30 + 15 = 45 ?

Always the LONGER therefore = 45

LFT’s

Go in reverse

4: 45, remember it’s the same.

3 :45-6 = 39

2 : 39 – 7 = 32 or 45 – 15 = 30

Always the SHORTER therefore 30

1. 0, remember it’s the same.

Page 9: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

A

A

A

B

B

B

C

C

D

Neither task C nor D can start until tasks A and B are completed

Neither task B nor D can start until tasks A and C are completed

Task D can be started when Task C is completed

Neither task B nor C can start until tasks A is completed

Task A will be divided up into two tasks : B & C

Task B cannot be started before Task A is complete

Task A must be started before Task B, but either could finish first

Page 10: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

BUT AT THIS STAGE WE HAVE NOT YET LOOKED AT THIS IDEA

OF ‘CRITICAL’

“TASKS THAT CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT AFFECTING

THE WHOLE PRODUCTION PROCESS”

Page 11: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0

a. Finish work

30 mins

30

30

b. Tidy up

7 mins

45

45

37

39

c. clear laptops

15 mins

d. Put up chairs

6 mins

To identify the critical tasks Lets assume a universal small change of 1 minute

Now last 31 minutes. That will affect the EST of Node 2 – & push it up to 31 min.

Now last 8 minutes. That will affect the EST of Node 3 and push it up to 39 min.

Now last 16 minutes. That will affect the EST of Node 4 and push it up to 47 min.

Now last 7 minutes. That will affect the EST of Node 4 and push it up to 46 min.

?

The Critical Tasks are A and B, so the Critical Path is shown by the route connecting Nodes 1, 2 and 3

ALL CRITICAL tasks WILL HAVE E.S.T.s THAT ARE EQUAL TO THEIR L.F.T.s

Page 12: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

Common Error

a

b

c

c

2 tasks starting at the same time, with the same follow-on task.

You cant draw it as we see because this would indicate that task a & b are the same duration

It would need to be as we have drawn before [see left]

A

B

C

Page 13: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

(Code) Task Preceded by

Duration (mins)

A. Take a shower - 10

B. Have breakfast A 15

C. Text friends A 6

D. Get dressed C 10

E. Drive to interview B & D 25

1. Draw the NETWORK Diagram

2. Identify the Critical Path

3. How long should you allow yourself to get to the interview on time?

Page 14: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0

15

10

B

C

A10

10

6

26

26

16

16

D 10

25

E 51

51

We also talk about a FLOAT

Is an activity which has an amount of time by which it can be extended and not affect the overall project time frame

Which task here has a float? And how large is this float?

Activity B! 1 minute

Page 15: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

P719 -722 readingp723 Q5.8.1

7

3

A

BF

0

0

5

7

7

5

5

D

5

2

C 9

10

10

10

13

13

E

3

Page 16: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

P723 readingp724 Q5.8.2

0

0

6 weeks

1 week

A. foundation1

1

7

7

3

8

11

11

B. Construction

C. Pool E&F

2 weeks

D. Pool T&S

2 weeks

E. House ID&F

3 weeks 10

10

F. Final Testing

1 week

Explain why its important?..... 4 marks

Page 17: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

P724 -726 readingp727 Q5.8.3

FREE FLOAT = EST (of next) – Duration (of current) – EST (of current)The amount of time that an activity can be delayed without affecting the EST of the next activity

TOTAL FLOAT = [ LFT (of next) – Duration (of current) – EST (of current) ] You then add up all the Total FloatsThe amount of time a sequence of tasks can be delayed without affecting the whole process

0

0

4

4

A. 4

4

8

11

7

7

B.

C.

311

11

14

14

16

16

21

215

E.

5

H

4

D

3

F

2G

FF =

ActB = 8-4-4 = 0

ActE = 16-5-8 = 3

TF =

ActB = 11-4-4 = 3

ActE = 16-5-8 = 3

= 6

Page 18: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

P727 -728 readingp729 Q5.8.4

Page 19: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

P729 - 730 reading

Page 20: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

The revised times are:

CODE TASK

D 45

E 120

F 30

Recalculate the network diagram and show the new time for the whole project. State whether the critical path has changed [3 marks]

3. Using this information and evidence from the case itself evaluate whether Max should go ahead and build the cottages [6 marks]

MAXS COTTAGES [revised] QUESTION

2. continued

[6 marks]

Page 21: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0 30

A

45

B

45

45

60

C105

105

75

10530

D

195

90

E

5

J

20

I20

F

235

235

255

255

260

260

215

215

30

G

20

H

275

275

15K

195

Assume you need to B.Build Access Road in order to bring in the cement needed to C.Lay Foundationie Task C is preceded by A&B

Assume also that you need to B.Build Access Road in order to bring in the materials needed to C.Lay Cables + Water Pipes ie Task D is preceded by A&B too

0

0

MAXS COTTAGES [revised] ANSWER

Page 22: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0 30

A

45

B

45

45

60

C105

105

75

10530

D

225

90

E

5

J

20

I20

F

275

275

295

295

300

300

255

255

30

G

20

H

315

315

15K

225

Assume you need to B.Build Access Road in order to bring in the cement needed to C.Lay Foundationie Task C is preceded by A&B

Assume also that you need to B.Build Access Road in order to bring in the materials needed to C.Lay Cables + Water Pipes ie Task D is preceded by A&B too

0

0

45

120

30

MAXS COTTAGES [revised] ANSWER

Page 23: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

QUANTITATIVE

You originally reduced the Project Time by 90 days, to 275 days. Which is a 25% reduction.

He then, in his re-estimations, bought it back up again by 55 days. Which is 20% increase (in relation to your New Project Time.)

However 15 of those 55 days where part of the Float in Activity D so the Project Time only went up by 40 days which represents a 15% increase (in relation to your New Project Time).

The Final Revised Project Time is now 315 days, which is still 50 days less than originally quoted. Or 14% less.

He has bought his final prices down by $30 000 which represents 20%.

His prices have gone from $411/day to $381/day (although this ignores material costs)

QUALITATIVE

He seems to be an over-charger, and requires careful watching. Do we want to get into a relationship with him? HOWEVER Do we have other options? Will they be any better.

What is the likelihood of getting the Planning Permission? On time? If there is delays not caused by the Builders, what will be their overtime charge rates?

Significant saving possible with Just-in-Time, provided motivation sand weather remain predictable

Conclusion :

We seem to have got a more competitive prices now and if we are willing to commit time to building a positive relationship with our supplier then I would recommend we go ahead. We should of course bear in mind that the CPA has limitations and numerous unforeseen factors might extend the actual task time.

MAXS COTTAGES [revised] ANSWER

Page 24: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

The revised times are:

CODE TASK

D 45

E 120

F 30

Recalculate the network diagram and show the new time for the whole project. State whether the critical path has changed [3 marks]

3. Using this information and evidence form the case itself evaluate whether Max should go ahead and build the cottages [8 marks]

MAXS COTTAGES [original] QUESTION

2. continued

Page 25: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0 30

A

45

B

30

..

60

C

45

260

90

90

60

6030

D

180

90

E

5

J

20

I20

F

220

220

240

240

245

245

200

200

30

G

20

H

260

260

15K

180

Assume you need NOT B.Build Access Road in order to C.Lay Foundation

MAXS COTTAGES [original] ANSWER

Page 26: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

0

0 30

A

45

B

30

30

60

C

45

300

90

90

75

6030

D

210

90

E

5

J

20

I20

F

260

260

280

280

285

285

240

240

30

G

20

H

300

300

15K

210

Assume you need NOT B.Build Access Road in order to C.Lay Foundation

45

120

30

MAXS COTTAGES [original] ANSWER

Page 27: CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS aka NETWORK PATH ANALYSIS DESIGNED to help managers who are planning complex projects that involve many interrelated tasks The idea

QUANTITATIVE

You originally reduced the Project Time by 105 days, to 260 days. Which is a 29% reduction.

He then, in his re-estimations, bought it back up again by 55 days. Which is 21% increase (in relation to your New Project Time.)

However 15 of those 55 days where part of the Float in Activity D so the Project Time only went up by 40 days which represents a 15% increase (in relation to your New Project Time).

The Final Revised Project Time is now 300 days, which is still 65 days less than originally quoted. Or 18% less.

He has bought his final prices down by $30 000 which represents 20%.

His prices have gone from $411/day to $400/day (although this ignores material costs)

QUALITATIVE

He seems to be an over-charger, and requires careful watching. Do we want to get into a relationship with him? HOWEVER Do we have other options? Will they be any better.

What is the likelihood of getting the Planning Permission? On time? If there is delays not caused by the Builders, what will be their overtime charge rates?

Conclusion :

We seem to have got a more competitive prices now an dif we are willing to commit time to building a positive relationship with our supplier then I would recommend we go ahead

MAXS COTTAGES [original] ANSWER