4
Critical Parameters Affecting Process Validation Validation is an integral part of quality assurance; it involves systematic study of systems, facilities and processes aimed at determining whether they perform their intended functions adequately and consistently as specified. Validation in itself does not improve processes but confirms that the processes have been properly developed and are under control. Adequate validation is beneficial to the manufacturer in many ways It deepens the understanding of processes; decreases the risk of preventing problems, defect costs, regulatory non compliances and thus assures the smooth running of the process. Process Validation is key to a robust manufacturing process Process validation involves a series of activities taking place over the lifecycle of product and process. Validation requires a meticulous preparation and careful planning of the various steps in the process. All work involved should be carried out in a structured way according to formally authorized standardized working procedures. 1. What are the Critical Parameters affecting Process Validation? The critical parameters should normally be identified during the development stage or from historical data or during manufacturing and process control. Process validation involves three stages and now will identify the critical parameters in these stages. 2. Stage One: Process Design Process design is the activity of defining the commercial manufacturing process. The goal of this stage is to design a process suitable for routine commercial manufacturing that can consistently deliver a product that meets its critical quality attributes. A product development activity provides key inputs to the design stage, such as the intended dosage form, the quality attributes, and a general manufacturing pathway. The functionality and limitations of commercial manufacturing equipment should be

Critical Parameters Affecting Process Validation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Parámetros críticos que afectan el proceso de Validación

Citation preview

  • Critical Parameters Affecting Process Validation

    Validation is an integral part of quality assurance; it involves systematic study of systems, facilities and

    processes aimed at determining whether they perform their intended functions adequately and

    consistently as specified. Validation in itself does not improve processes but confirms that the

    processes have been properly developed and are under control. Adequate validation is beneficial to the

    manufacturer in many ways It deepens the understanding of processes; decreases the risk of preventing problems, defect costs, regulatory non compliances and thus assures the smooth running of

    the process.

    Process Validation is key to a robust manufacturing process

    Process validation involves a series of activities taking place over the lifecycle of product and process.

    Validation requires a meticulous preparation and careful planning of the various steps in the process.

    All work involved should be carried out in a structured way according to formally authorized

    standardized working procedures.

    1. What are the Critical Parameters affecting Process Validation? The critical parameters should normally be identified during the development stage or from historical

    data or during manufacturing and process control. Process validation involves three stages and now

    will identify the critical parameters in these stages.

    2. Stage One: Process Design Process design is the activity of defining the commercial manufacturing process. The goal of this stage

    is to design a process suitable for routine commercial manufacturing that can consistently deliver a

    product that meets its critical quality attributes. A product development activity provides key inputs to

    the design stage, such as the intended dosage form, the quality attributes, and a general manufacturing

    pathway. The functionality and limitations of commercial manufacturing equipment should be

  • considered, also contributions of variability by different component lots, production operators,

    environmental conditions and measurement systems in the production setting.

    Designing an efficient process with an effective process control approach is dependent on the process

    knowledge. Use of risk analysis tools to screen potential variables for Design of Experiment (DOE)

    studies to minimize the total number of experiments. The results of DOE studies can provide

    justification for establishing ranges of incoming component quality, equipment parameters and in-

    process material quality attributes. Manufactures should document the variables studied for a unit

    operation and the rationale for those variables identified as significant. This information is useful

    during the process qualification and continued process verification stages, including the design is

    revised or strategy for control is refined.

    Process control addresses the variability to assure quality of the product. Controls can consists of

    material analysis and equipment monitoring at significant processing points designed to assure that the

    operation remains on target and in control with respect to output quality. Timely analysis, control and

    adjust the processing conditions so that the output remains constant.

    3. Stage Two: Process Qualification During this stage, the process design is confirmed as being capable of reproducible commercial

    manufacturing. It confirms that all established limits of the critical parameters are valid and that

    satisfactory products can be produced even under worst case condition. This stage has following

    elements Qualification of Utilities and Equipment.

    Installation Qualification is an essential step preceding the Process Validation exercise which is

    normally executed by Engineering group. The installation of equipment should follow well defined

    plans which is developed and finalized following progression through a number of design stages. This

    stage of validation includes examination of Equipment Design, Determination of Calibration,

    Maintenance and Adjustment Requirements.

    Consider the following Equipment Calibration Requirements

    1. Confirmation of calibration of calibrating equipment with reference to the appropriate national

    standard.

    2. Calibration of measuring devices utilized in the Operational Qualification stage.

    3. Identification of calibration requirements for measuring devices for the future use of the equipment.

    At the Installation Qualification stage the company should document preventive maintenance

    requirements for installed equipment.

    Operational Qualification is an exercise oriented to engineering function referred as commissioning. It

    is important stage to assure all operational test data conform with pre-determined acceptance criteria

    and manufacturer should develop draft standard operating procedures for the equipment, service

    operation, cleaning activities, maintenance requirements and calibration schedules.

    The critical operating parameters for the equipment or the plant should be identified at the Operational

    Qualification stage. Critical variables should incorporate specific details and tests that have been

  • developed. The completion of a successful Operational Qualification should include the finalization of

    operating procedures and operator instructions documentation for the equipment.

    Performance Qualification combines the actual facility, utilities, equipment, trained personnel, control

    procedures and components to produce commercial batches. Performance qualification will have a

    higher level of sampling, additional testing and greater scrutiny of process performance. The level of

    monitoring and testing should be sufficient to confirm uniform product quality throughout the batch

    during process.

    4. Stage Three: Continued Process Verification Continually assure that the process remains in a state of control during commercial manufacturing. A

    system or systems for detecting unplanned departures from the process as designed is essential. The

    following points to be considered in Continued Process Verification.

    Collection and evaluation of information and data about the performance of the process will allow

    detection of process drift. Evaluation should determine whether action must be taken to prevent the

    process from drifting out of control.

    An ongoing program to collect and analyze product and process data that relate to product quality must

    be established to verify the critical quality attributes are being controlled throughout the process.

    Process variation also can be detected by assessment of defect complaints, out of specifications finding,

    process deviation reports, process yield variations, batch records, incoming raw material records and

    adverse event reports.

    Operators errors should be tracked to measure the quality of the training program. Maintenance of the facility, utilities and equipment is an important aspect of ensuring that a process

    remains in control.

    5. Conclusion Process validation is a mean of ensuring and documenting that the processes are capable of producing a

    finished product of the required quality consistently and should cover all the critical elements of the

    manufacturing process. The process design stage and the process qualification stage should have as a

    focus the measurement system and control loop establishing scientific evidence that the process is

    reproducible and will consistently deliver quality products.

    Good process design and development should anticipate significant sources of variability and establish

    appropriate detection, control, appropriate alert and action limits. Process variability should be

    periodically assessed. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to judge and provide evidence of a

    high degree of assurance in its manufacturing process.

    6. References

  • Guidance for Industry Process Validation: General Principles and Practices US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Nov. 2008 Current Good

    Manufacturing Practices.

    ANNEX 15. Validation Master Plan, Design Qualification, Installation and Operational

    Qualification, Non Sterile Process Validation, Cleaning Validation. 17th Sep. 1999.

    7. Author Rajkumar P. Patil

    Sr. Production Officer

    Mobile No. +919945642935

    Mail ID. [email protected]