CRESCENT 2007 Poultry Sector Survey - Home | … 2007 Poultry Sector Survey Cianjur & Bandung Districts of West Java Indonesia Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project on the Control

C R E S C E N T 2 0 0 7

Poultry

Sector

Survey

Cianjur & Bandung

Districts of West Java

Indonesia

Indonesian-Netherlands

Partnership Project on the

Control of HPAI

POULTRY SECTOR SURVEY IN BANDUNG AND CIANJUR DISTRICTS OF WEST JAVA PROVINCE

II | P A G E


III | P A G E

PREFACE The poultry sector survey in Cianjur and Bandung Districts was a joint activity

between the Netherlands Partnership Project on the Control of HPAI and Crescent.

This activity resulted in the comprehensive description of poultry production sector

and the map of poultry sector distribution; which was expected to become valid

reference in the surveillance implementation policy and vaccination strategy at field

level.

This activity was completed by the valuable support from local Dinas, farmers as

respondents, and other related parties. Allow us to convey our highest gratitude for

active participations from all parties, so that we could collect meaningful data and

fruitful information in order to complete this report.

We also would like to encourage all readers to convey their valuable critics in

order to improve this presentation.


IV | P A G E

Contents

Preface ........................................................................................................ iii

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1

A. Background....................................................................................................... 1

B. Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2

C. Outputs ............................................................................................................. 2

D. Phase of Activity ............................................................................................... 2

2 METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................3

A. Time and Location ............................................................................................ 3

B. The General Approach of Survey...................................................................... 3

C. Survey Instrument ............................................................................................ 4

D. Data Collecting Technique................................................................................ 4

E. Method of Survey ............................................................................................. 7

1/ Sampling Technique .......................................................................................... 7

2/ Estimation of Sector 4 Population Number and Density................................... 9

3/ Biosecurity Condition ...................................................................................... 10

3 WORK PLAN..........................................................................................12

A. Work Stage ..................................................................................................... 12

B. Work Schedule................................................................................................ 14

4 ORGANIZATION ....................................................................................15

A. General ........................................................................................................... 15

B. Personnel........................................................................................................ 15

C. Mobilization of Expert Task and Responsibility ............................................. 15

D. Timeframe of Expert Deployment.................................................................. 17

5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION.....................................................................19

A. Survey Accomplishment ................................................................................. 19

B. Poultry Sector Location .................................................................................. 20

1/ Cianjur District ................................................................................................. 20

2/ Bandung District .............................................................................................. 30


V | P A G E

C. Disease History ............................................................................................... 40

D. Vaccination Program ...................................................................................... 45

E. Production Input and Output Flow ................................................................ 48

1/ Sector 1 Farm .................................................................................................. 48

2/ Sector 2 Farm .................................................................................................. 49

3/ Sector 3 Farm .................................................................................................. 52

4/ Wet market, Slaughterhouse, and Poultry Collector ...................................... 59

F. Sector 4 Farm Profile ...................................................................................... 60

1/ Farm Location.................................................................................................. 60

2/ Farm Characteristics ........................................................................................ 61

3/ Biosecurity Condition ...................................................................................... 70

4/ Estimation of Population ................................................................................. 71

5/ Population Density .......................................................................................... 74

6/ Avian Influenza (AI) Vaccination Status........................................................... 76

7/ Production Input and Output Flow ................................................................. 77

G. Total Poultry Population Number and Density .............................................. 79

H. Poultry Sector Infrastructure.......................................................................... 83

1/ Cianjur District ................................................................................................. 83

2/ Bandung District .............................................................................................. 91

6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ..............................................95

A. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 95

B. Recommendations.......................................................................................... 96

7 Appendices.............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.


1 | P A G E

1 INTRODUCTION

A. Background

Avian influenza is still a serious threat to Asian countries; both to humans as well

as to animals. This disease is caused by a virus of H5N1 subtype of A type which has

been known to be very dangerous and had caused death to over 140 people and

millions of birds. The first case of H5N1 virus infection was detected in Hongkong in

1997 and reemerged around Asia throughout 2003.

Currently, the virus has spread to some areas in Indonesia and in other Asian

countries which drove serious concern over the possibility of a new virus by mutation

that could transfer among humans and has the potency to inflict worldwide pandemic.

This condition had spurred the Government of Indonesia, World Health Organization

(WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), other international bodies, and local

partners to collaborate in controlling the virus and to prevent it to turn into a

dangerous pandemic. The current strategy that has been developed to control the

avian influenza disease in Indonesia is 1). To increase biosecurity practices; 2). To

vaccinate all poultry in the infected as well as the suspected areas; 3). To do limited

depopulation and compensation; 4). To control poultry and its product movement

traffic; 5). To do surveillance and back-trace; 6). To do restocking; 7). To do stamping

out in the newly infected areas; 8). To encourage public awareness; 9). To perform

monitoring and evaluation to all the above practices.

In order to support the strategy of bird flu control, the Indonesian-Netherlands

Partnership Project on the Control of HPAI will collaborate with local institutions to

perform the surveillance and testing of intervention strategies for the control of avian

influenza in Indonesia. The objective of the field studies is to provide information for

the development of provincial and national vaccination, surveillance and other HPAI

control strategies.

To support the selection of suitable areas for the expansion of the field studies,

surveys of the poultry production sector in these sub-districts have to be made. In

these surveys information should be collected on poultry population, disease

prevalence, farm types, movement, marketing and slaughtering of poultry. The

selection on the new area where to implement the new field studies on surveillance

and vaccination strategies will be based on the results of this poultry sector survey. In

the frame of the above interest, there had been a work contract between Indonesia

and the Netherlands that constituted in an Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project

on the Control of HPAI and CRESCENT (contract no.: Pc07/WI0791) for poultry sector


2 | P A G E

survey in three sub districts in Cianjur district and three sub districts in Bandung

district.

B. Objectives

The objectives of this poultry sector survey were to:

1. Provide a description of the entire poultry production sector, the poultry disease

situation, poultry marketing, (participatory) poultry organizations and

infrastructure.

2. Produce map(s) of the poultry distribution in the chosen six sub-districts.

C. Outputs

The outputs of this poultry sector survey were:

1. The description of the entire poultry production sector, the poultry disease

situation, poultry marketing, (participatory) poultry organizations and

infrastructure.

2. The map (s) of the distribution of poultry in the six sub-districts.

D. Phase of Activity

The phases of this poultry sector survey were to:

1. Perform internal coordination and socialization of poultry sector survey to Dinas

Peternakan and target respondents at survey area.

2. Prepare a draft for a questionnaire to collect information from sector 1, 2, and 3 of

the poultry sector, hatcheries, collecting points, slaughterhouses, and poultry wet

market (poultry population, types, disease situation, HPAI outbreaks, trading chain,

and sources of production input).

3. Survey (interviews) to collect the information on sector 1, 2, and 3 of the poultry

sector, hatcheries, poultry wet markets, collecting points and slaughterhouses.

4. Establish the exact location by GPS of the poultry farms, collector points and other

trading places of live poultry and transfer this to a map (scale: 1: 10,000)

5. Evaluate biosecurity condition and make an estimation of sector 4 poultry

population in villages (desa) and sub-villages (kampung) (poultry numbers, types,

GPS location) and any moving poultry/duck flocks.

6. Collect information through interviews and questionnaires on the existing

infrastructure for the poultry sector and transfer this information as much as

possible to a map.

7. Analysis of data from the questionnaires, estimates and other sources,

presentation of data in easy accessible excel tables and preparation of summary

tables.

8. Preparation of a draft report of the results of the survey (hard and soft copies)

9. Preparation of the final report after receiving comments from the project.


3 | P A G E

2 METHODOLOGY

A. Time and Location

Data collection for the poultry sector survey was completed in the period of

August to September. The poultry sector survey location covered three sub districts in

each district; they were:

1. Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah in Cianjur District

2. Majalaya, Arjasari, and Rancaekek in Bandung District

B. The General Approach of Survey

The essence of this “Poultry Sector Survey in Bandung and Cianjur Districts of

West Java Province” was to approach the survey through three main activities; i.e.

survey, mapping, and data analysis. The survey and mapping aim for targets: 1)

Poultry farms in sector 1, 2, 3, and 4; 2) Wet market trading live poultry; 3) Collecting

points; 4) Slaughterhouses; 5) Public and private veterinary support services; 6) Poultry

association; and 7) suppliers for production input (feed, medicine, and vaccine). The

analysis was based on data and information obtained from the survey.

The results expected to come up through this survey are 1) Location of the farms,

wet markets trading live poultry, collecting points, and slaughterhouses; 2) Information

about owners of poultry business; 3) Number of poultry and type; 4) Number of

traders; 5) Poultry population; 6) Poultry disease situation (incl. AI outbreaks,

vaccination program); 7) product produced (number and type); 8) Marketing of

products; 9) Source, type, and number of poultry traded; and 10) Source of production

inputs (DOC, pullets, feed, vaccines, medicines, etc); and 11) any integration and

connection and poultry industry participation in disease control. The mapping activity

was to cover the exact locations of the poultry farms (sector 1, 2, 3, and 4), collecting

points, slaughterhouses, wet markets, Dinas Peternakan, suppliers and traders of

production input, and poultry population density of poultry sector 4 using the

geographical information system method. The analyzed data and information were to

describe the poultry population, types, disease situation, HPAI outbreaks, trading, and

source of DOC in charts and tables. Furthermore, the survey also covered sector 4 in

terms of number of population, population density, and biosecurity condition at village

and sub district level.

The outputs of these activities of survey, mapping, and data analysis were the

description of the entire poultry production sector (including the poultry disease

situation; poultry marketing; participatory poultry organizations, and infrastructure)


4 | P A G E

and the map(s) of the poultry distribution in the six sub districts. Such outputs were

expected to serve as reference in the implementation of surveillance and vaccination

strategy in new areas performed by Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project on the

Control of HPAI

Schematically, the survey study approach can be seen in Figure 2-1.

C. Survey Instrument

Instruments used in this “Poultry Sector Survey” were questionnaires and

checklists structurally made for data coverage and survey efficacy (see the

attachment). Questionnaire and checklist are data collection tools that are directly

conveyed to respondents/target through statements.

The questionnaire used both open and closed questions; the closed ones

provided respondent with the answers to choose; while the open ones asked the

respondent’s view on certain subject in question.

D. Data Collecting Technique

Primary and secondary data were collected for the survey. Secondary data was

obtained from Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan Kabupaten Cianjur and Dinas

Peternakan and Perikanan Kabupaten Bandung.

Primary data was collected through survey by using questionnaires and in depth

interviews to respondents. The respondents were all parties related to the poultry

sector from upstream to downstream. This was to see the pattern and intensity of

flock movement which were very important in the context of AI disease control.

The tracing of source and type of primary and secondary data can be seen in

Table 2-1 and Table 2-2.


5 | P A G E

Figure 2-1. The Approach in Poultry Sector Survey Study


6 | P A G E

Table 2-1. Source and Type of Primary Data

No Sector Respondent Data Type Person in

Charge

Farm location (address and GPS details)

Information on owner, part of

association/integration, etc.

Number of farm and type of poultry

Disease situation (including AI cases, vaccination

programs)

Product marketing

1 Sector 1, 2:

Grandparent stock,

parent stock, layer

farm, broiler farm

Farm manager

Production input source (DOC, pullets, feed, vaccine,

medicine, etc.)

Supervisor






programs)

Product marketing

2 Sector 3: broiler,

kampong chicken,

quail, pigeon, plasma

farms

Farm manager/

owner


medicine, etc.)

Enumerator

Poultry number

Poultry type

GPS details

3 Sector 4: kampung

chicken, duck, muscovy

duck, quail, goose

Owner

Poultry movement

Enumerator

Market location (address and GPS details)

Number of trader

Source, type, and number of poultry traded

4 Wet Markets (live

poultry trading)

Trader

Disease situation (including AI cases)

Enumerator






programs)

Product marketing

5 Collecting Points Trader


medicine, etc.)

Enumerator






programs)

Product marketing

6 Slaughterhouses Owner/manager


medicine, etc.)

Enumerator

Staff and facilities (including GPS details) of Dinas

Peternakan

7 Government support

for veterinary service

Animal Health

Section of District

Dinas Peternakan AI disease surveillance and control program by Dinas

Peternakan (field implementation)

Enumerator

Staff and facilities (including GPS details) of private

sector

8 Private sector support

for veterinary service

Technical service

Employees of private sector working in the area in

term of AI disease surveillance and control measures

Enumerator

Active poultry associations, their members and

activities

Poultry association/integration, plasma, and other

active commercial connection (members and

activities)

9 Poultry farm

association and

integration

Administrator

Participatory poultry disease control program

(groups and their activities)

Enumerator

10 Supplier and trader of

production input (DOC,

Owner Supplier and trader (names, addresses, and GPS

details)

Enumerator


7 | P A G E

No Sector Respondent Data Type Person in

Charge

Product and quantity traded feed, medicines, and

vaccines) Customers

Table 2-2. Source and Type of Secondary Data

No Area Information Noted Person in Charge

Poultry population

Poultry type

Disease history

Number of farmer and trader

Location and number poultry farms sector 1, 2, 3

Location and number of Hatchery

Location and number of wet market

Location and number of poultry slaughterhouse and poultry

slaughtering site

Location and number of farmer association and poultry trader

Location and number of collecting point

Location and number of plasma farmer

1 District (Dinas Peternakan)

Location and number of production input company

Supervisor

Poultry population

Poultry type

Disease history

Number of farmer and trader

Location and number poultry farms sector 1, 2, 3

Location and number of Hatchery

Location and number of wet market

Location and number of poultry slaughterhouse and poultry

slaughtering site

Location and number of farmer association and poultry trader

Location and number of collecting point

Location and number of plasma farmer

2 Sub District

(Dinas Branch)

Location and number of production input company

Enumerator

E. Method of Survey

The method used in this survey was quantitative-descriptive approach; i.e. the

population in this survey was of poultry sector 1, 2, 3, and 4, wet markets trading live

poultry, collecting points, slaughterhouses, Dinas Peternakan, suppliers and traders in

the chosen six sub districts (kecamatan).

1/ Sampling Technique

The data collection technique used for the collection of poultry sector 1, 2, and 3,

trader, collecting point, poultry slaughterhouse, and wet market was by census

approach; i.e. all member of population was taken as respondent.

The data of address and number of sector 1, 2, 3 farmers , collectors,

slaughterhouse, and wet market in Cianjur district was obtained from Dinas Perikanan

and Peternakan of Cianjur district; as for data of Bandung was from Dinas Peternakan

and Perikanan of Bandung district. The sector 3 poultry data was obtained from KCD

field operative and Balai Desa (Kelurahan office/village administration office) at each

surveyed sub district. Furthermore, in order to acquire the exact address of the

respondents, the enumerators were accompanied by KCD field operatives and local

villagers.


8 | P A G E

Furthermore, the sampling technique for the estimation of poultry number and

density on sector 4; the team applied the procedure of multi stage random sampling.

The sample was chosen randomly with the first level of village selection at surveyed

each sub district. Afterwards, the RW was selected for each chosen village and finally

all poultry farmer in that RW was picked as respondents.

The sampling size taken was calculated by the following formula (at 95%

confidence level):

Note:

n = sample size

s2

= expected variance (with assumption of 10 poultry/RW)

L = desired absolute precision (with assumption of 5 poultry/RW)

Based on the above formula, the sample size taken was 16 RW/sub district and

the interview was to farmers in each selected RW.

The questionnaire for sector 4 farmers was of two types; i.e.:

1) The standard questionnaire (short interview); which covered the aspects

of: type and number of kept poultry, the source of poultry, and the

marketing target.

2) The complete questionnaire (long interview); which covered the aspects in

the standard questionnaire and completed with additional inquiries on:

purpose of poultry keeping, AI disease history, AI vaccination history,

poultry keeping system, handling of sick and dead poultry, cage and tools

sanitation, and flock movement control around the farm area.

The sampling technique for the sector 4 respondents could be described as

follows:

1) Four villages were picked out at sub district level. The village profile of

every sub district was acquired from sub district office.

2) At every chosen village, four RWs were randomly picked out. The RW

profile was acquired from the village administration office.

3) Every household with poultry in the selected RW was then chosen as

respondent and was interviewed with standard questionnaire (short

interview). The household with poultry location data was acquired from

RW administrator. When enumerators visited the farmer, they were

accompanied by RW administrator. For Bandung district, due to several

technical difficulties in the field (the number of sector 3 farm was too many

to cover in such a short timeframe because of the relatively far distance

from one farm to another and the road condition was quite hard) then the

selection of sector 4 respondent was through purposive sampling at each

chosen RW; i.e. 20 farmers/RW. Random sampling in this case was difficult

since there was no data of poultry farmer at village level.


9 | P A G E

4) The interview with complete questionnaire (long interview) was to 5

farmers/RW that were randomly and systematically picked out by

enumerator; i.e. enumerator randomized the first 10 farmers interviewed

(for example: the n farmer, and the next is the 10+n, 20+n, 30+n, and 40+n

farmers; with the assumption of 50 farmers/RW minimum). As for the

Bandung case, the enumerator randomized the 20 selected farmers; for

example: the n farmer, and the next is the 4+n, 8+n, 12+n, and 16+n

farmers to be interviewed with complete questionnaire.

2/ Estimation of Sector 4 Population Number and Density

The poultry population size estimation on sector 4 farm was carried out by three

approaches; they were: (1) determination of average poultry ownership per

household, (2) determination of proportion of household keeping poultry, and (3)

calculation of number of household existed in sub district and sampled village.

The estimation of sector-4 poultry population was then calculated by the

following formula:

Population number estimation = Average number of ownership/household x

proportion of household keeping poultry x

number of household

Notes:

• The average number of poultry ownership at the sampled village was estimated by

the data of poultry ownership in the four surveyed RWs in the respective village.

Furthermore, the average number of poultry ownership at sampled sub district was

estimated by the data of average number of poultry ownership in the four

surveyed villages of the respective sub district and this number was used as the

estimation factor for the other villages that did not belong to the sampled ones.

• The proportion of household owning poultry at sampled village was estimated by

the data of proportion of household keeping poultry in the four RWs at the

respective surveyed villages. Furthermore, the proportion of household owning

poultry at the sampled sub district was estimated by the proportion of household

owning poultry in the four surveyed villages of the respective sub district; and this

number was used as the estimator for household owning poultry at the other non-

sampled villages.

For Bandung district; the difficulties faced in the field had forced the team to do

sampling at every RW which resulted in the unknown proportion of household

keeping poultry at each sampled RW. Therefore, the estimation of proportion of

household keeping poultry was done by random sampling as many as 50

respondents in three RWs of one sampled village at each sampled sub district; by

this the team obtained the proportion of household keeping poultry from 150

respondents for each sampled sub district. This data was then used as the

estimator for proportion of household keeping poultry at the other surveyed sub

districts.


10 | P A G E

• The data of number of household per RW was obtained by a later survey; and the

number of household per village was acquired by demographic notes on each sub

district.

The calculated population number estimation was the estimation at the surveyed

sub district and sampled village level. In order to calculate the population number

estimation at surveyed sub district or village in the surveyed sub district that did not

belong to the sampled village, the used average number of poultry ownership was the

average number of ownership for sub district surveyed level. Furthermore, in order to

calculate the estimation of population number at sampled village level, the used

average number of ownership per household was the average number of ownership

for the respective village.

The proportion of household keeping poultry was used for sub district level; i.e.

for the calculation of population number estimation both at surveyed sub district as

well as at sampled village.

The poultry population density was calculated by the following formula:

The population density was calculated for surveyed sub district level and village

in the respective sub district.

3/ Biosecurity Condition

In order to know the biosecurity condition around poultry sector 4; the team

sampled five farmers of sector 4 as respondents from each of the selected RW as

previously described in the above sampling technique. The biosecurity aspect

observed included 7 variables; they were (1) poultry keeping system, (2) hygiene

(including the sanitation around cage, feed bowls, drinking bowls, and cage yard), (3)

sick bird handling, (4) dead bird handling, (5) poultry feces handling, (6) quarantine

measure, and (7) movement control around the farm area.

The type of biosecurity questions and their value can be seen in the next Table

2-3.

Table 2-3. Type of Question and Value for Biosecurity Aspect

No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

1 Handling of sick poultry 0 - 1 0=Sick poultry is not separated from the healthy ones

1=Sick poultry is separated from the healthy ones

2 Handling of dead poultry 0 - 1 0=Dead poultry is not buried/burned down

1= Dead poultry is buried/burned down

3 Quarantine measure for new poultry 0 - 1 0=New poultry is not separated from the old ones in

one week minimum

1= New poultry is separated from the old ones in one

week minimum

4 Poultry keeping system 1 - 4 1=Poultry is kept by freely roaming inside and outside

the house yard

2=Poultry is kept by freely roaming inside the fenced

house yard

3=Poultry is caged with fenced cage yard

4=Poultry is kept within the closed cage always


11 | P A G E

No. Type of Question Value Range Remarks

5 Cage hygiene in general 1 – 5 1=Very dirty

2=Dirty

3=Relatively clean

4=Clean

5=Very clean

6 Feed bowl hygiene 1 – 5 1=Very dirty

2=Dirty

3=Relatively clean

4=Clean

5=Very clean

7 Drinking bowl hygiene 1 – 5 1=Very dirty

2=Dirty

3=Relatively clean

4=Clean

5=Very clean

8 Cage yard cleanliness 1 – 5 1=Very dirty

2=Dirty

3=Relatively clean

4=Clean

5=Very clean

9 Handling of poultry manure 0 - 1 0=Stacked on the ground surface (open dumping)

1=Buried in hole in the ground/put in closed sack

10 Poultry movement control around the farm

area

0 - 1 0=No control

1=There is control measures

Total 5 - 29

The biosecurity condition was then categorized into three groups: good,

intermediate, and poor according to the total value of the seven variables observed.

This biosecurity grouping and the total of the seven values of variables observed can

be seen in Table 2-4.

Table 2-4. Group of Biosecurity Condition

Total Value of the Seven Observed Variables Biosecurity Category

< 17 Poor

17 - < 22 Intermediate

≥ 22 Good


12 | P A G E

3 WORK PLAN

A. Work Stage

Sequentially, the stages of this poultry sector survey covered the activity

preparation, desk study and secondary data collection, questionnaire formation,

questionnaire try-out and revision, pre-survey activity, survey implementation, data

recapitulation and input to computer, data processing and analysis, mapping, report

drafting, internal discussion and report revisions, and final report submission.

Those are elaborated as follows:

1. Activity Preparation

• Internal coordination

• Proposal revision

• Expert team discussion

• Expected result: activity implementation details

2. Desk Study and Secondary Data Collection

• Gathering secondary data and information of both qualitative and quantitative

through the internet or related sources.

• Studying and doing analysis information from other sources.

• Expected result: collected important data and information that could support

the construction of study instrument and reporting.

3. Questionnaire Formation

• Building up questionnaire to be used in interview to selected respondent.

• Expected result: formulized items of question to be used as primary data

collection tool.

4. Questionnaire Try-out and Revision

• Performing test of questionnaire on to selected volunteers whose

characteristics resemble the actual field respondent.

• Obtaining comments from Wageningen International on the proposed

questionnaires

• Expected result: formulated reliable questionnaires to be used as primary data

collection tool.


13 | P A G E

5. Pre-survey Activity

• Performing internal coordination for field data collection based on the

formulized research method, enumerator selection, and permit preparation for

data collection at district/municipal (kabupaten/kota) and sub-district

(kecamatan) levels.

• Performing training to equip enumerators with basic knowledge and

comprehension over poultry sector survey.

• Expected result: the prepared site target and trained enumerator in primary

data collection.

6. Survey Implementation

• Performing the collection of primary data and other supportive data in the field

through formulized questionnaire.

• Resuming daily activity in a log consisting of important events during field

survey.

• The district/municipal coordinator performs periodical supervision to observe

the survey implementation and help out enumerators with problems faced in

the field.

• Expected result: gathered valid and reliable primary data from the survey.

7. Data Recapitulation and Computer Input

• Performing primary data recapitulation from each questionnaire by certain

coding used for further data analysis.

• Performing data input to computer.

• Expected result: gathered comprehensive and ready-to-analyze data.

8. Data Processing and Analysis

• Performing data processing according to the selected method.

• Expected result: accurate and reliable data analysis.

9. Mapping

• Performing mapping based on the GPS data acquired from the field.

• Expected result: map of the distribution of poultry in the 4 sub-districts

10. Report Drafting

• The elaboration of the whole study activity implemented including results and

discussions, conclusions, and recommendations.

• Expected result: report substance that will need further revisions.

11. Internal discussions and report revisions.

• Discussion between expert team and Netherlands Partnership Project on The

Control of HPAI for the report substance revision.

• Expected result: final report substance revision.


14 | P A G E

12. Final Reporting

The final report of the whole poultry sector survey was the revised version of draft

report that had been amended through comments from and discussion with the

employer.

B. Work Schedule

Table 3-1. Schedule of Activity

Timeline

August September October November December No Activity

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

I Preparation

1.1 Planning and Activity Schedule Development in Accordance to TOR

�

1.2 Internal coordination; aiming for the same comprehension and perception on the substance under study and to develop activity planning

�

1.3 External coordination

�

1.4 Gathering study material (desk study) related to substance under study

� �

1.5 Questionnaire revision

� �

1.6 Questionnaire try-out and revision

� �

1.7 Pre-survey �

II Implementation

2.1 Survey in Cianjur � �

2.2 Survey in Bandung � �

2.3 Data Retracing �

2.4 Data recapitulation and input

� � � �

2.5 Data processing and analysis

� �

2.6 Mapping � �

III Reporting

3.1 Draft report � �

3.2 Submission of draft report

�

3.4 Internal discussion and report revision

� � �

3.5 Final reporting � �

3.6 Submission of draft final report

�

3.7 Submission of final report

�


15 | P A G E

4 ORGANIZATION

A. General

CRESCENT had formed a team that consists of two groups of expert; i.e. main

expert team and supporting assistant who have solid experience in their respective

field. Considering the inter-related work, the working team must collaborate

effectively and efficiently under the coordination of the Team Leader.

B. Personnel

To be able to perform the study appropriately in an effective and efficient

manner, this study would need performers with high integrity organized in a compact

and systematic manner. The organization for the poultry sector survey is shown in the

following diagram.

C. Mobilization of Expert Task and Responsibility

1. Team Leader

• To coordinate and execute the whole technical aspect and administration of the

activity.

• To give out technical instruction to all team member, to conduct supervision on

the activity implementation, and to maintain fulfilling collaboration among team

members in work completion.

• To directly involve in activity implementation together with all team member.

• To conduct technical consultation together with all team member to employer.

• To specifically take responsibility for every step of activity implementation; from

coordination to reporting.


16 | P A G E

2. Epidemiology Expert

• To coordinate intensively with all team member.

• To involve in and take responsibility in the development of study instrument as

guideline to primary data and information collection, especially from the bird flu

epidemiology point of view at target site.

• To identify the bird flu movement in the target site.

• To involve in and take responsibility in data and information analysis to

comprehend the whole target poultry production sectors, any condition of

disease at target site, patterns of poultry marketing, organization, and

infrastructure.

• To involve in and take responsibility in draft and final reporting.

3. Animal Health Expert



guideline to primary data and information collection, especially from the animal

health point of view at target site.

• To identify diseases attacking poultry at target site and their handling.




infrastructure.


4. Bio-statistics Expert


• To develop appropriate survey method as guidance for data and information

collection, especially in the determination of sample size and analysis method

used.


guidance in the primary data and information collection.

• To take responsibility in data and information recapitulation acquired from the

field survey.

• To involve in and take responsibility in data processing and analysis in order to

acquire complete description on the whole poultry production sector, disease

condition, patterns of poultry marketing, organization, and infrastructure at

target site, and to estimate the size of poultry in sector 4.


5. Animal Farming Expert



17 | P A G E


guidance in the primary data and information collection, especially in the aspect

of animal production.

• To identify input source of poultry production, production type, and condition of

the poultry production organization and infrastructure.




infrastructure.


6. Geographical Information System (GIS) Expert


• To perform desk study on GIS mapping applications.


guidance in the primary data and information collection, especially in the aspect

of GPS information processing.

• To perform analysis on primary and secondary data and other information in the

mapping of poultry distribution at 4 target sub-districts (kecamatan).

• To develop concept/formula for GIS mapping application.

• To develop poultry distribution map on target sites using GIS.


7. Administration Support

• To perform activity implementation administration.


8. Computer Operator Support

• To input data and information into computer for further analysis.

• To assist team in data analysis.


9. Enumerator

• To take responsibility in field data and information collection using the designed

questionnaire.

• To compose daily field log according to the developed format.

D. Timeframe of Expert Deployment

Timeline

August September October November December No Team Position

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

1 Drh. Deni Noviana, PhD Team Leader � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �


18 | P A G E

Timeline

August September October November December No Team Position

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Animal Health Expert

2 Drh. Abdul Zahid Ilyas, MSi Epidemiology Expert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

3 Agus Setiyono, DVM, Ph.D Animal Health Expert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

4 Ir. Etih Sudarnika, MSi Bio-statistics expert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

5 Rina Andriani Animal Farming Expert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

6 Delon Marthinus GIS expert � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �


19 | P A G E

5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION This chapter will cover results of the field survey from various aspects that had

been completed through the poultry survey activity. Systematically, these aspects

cover (i) survey accomplishments; especially on covered target, poultry population

and number of respondents of poultry sector at survey sites, (ii) geographic features of

poultry sector; including spatial distribution and the amount and density of poultry

population (of sector 1, 2, and 3) at every survey site, (iii) the disease history for the

last three years suffered by the poultry sectors at survey sites; especially the disease

history of avian influenza (AI), Newcastle (ND), and gumboro (IBD), (iv) the existing

vaccination program done by sector 1, 2, and 3; especially for avian influenza,

Newcastle, and gumboro diseases, and (v) the input and output flow of production on

all poultry sectors at survey sites.

The sector 4 poultry profile; which includes farm location, farm characteristics,

biosecurity conditions, estimation of poultry population, population density,

vaccination status, and production input and output flow; will be specifically discussed

within this chapter. The end part of this chapter will cover the population number and

density at the whole sectors (1, 2, 3, and 4) and the existing infrastructure conditions

that support the poultry sector at survey sites.

A. Survey Accomplishment

The poultry sector survey had been completed within the following time frame:

1. The period of 28 August 2007 until 1 September 2007 was for survey of three sub

districts in Cianjur district; i.e. Cilaku, Karangtengah, and Mande sub districts

2. The period of 4 September until 8 September 2007 was for survey of three sub

districts in Bandung district; i.e. Arjasari, Rancaekek, and Majalaya dub districts

3. The period of 24 September until 28 September 2007 was for a quick retracing the

two survey districts to complete any missing data and information gained on the

first survey.

4. The period of 19 November until 23 November 2007: additional data collection on

the number of household/RW at surveyed sites in order to accurately calculate the

poultry owner proportion number in sampled village.

The below two tables; Table 5-1 and Table 5-12; show the complete target list

and number of respondent of poultry sector surveyed at each sub district on the

respective Cianjur and Bandung districts.


20 | P A G E

Table 5-1. Survey Target and Number of Respondent at Three Sub Districts in Cianjur District

Number of Respondent per Sub District Respondent

Cilaku Mande Karangtengah Total

Sector 1 - 1 - 1

Sector 2 3* 2* 1 6

Sector 3 28 10 7 45

Sector 4 551 516 410 1,477

Poultry Infrastructure 1 1

Poultry Slaughterhouse (TPA) - - - -

Collecting Point (TPnA) 2 - 4 6

Wet Market 2 2

Note: * Two sector 2 farmers; one in Cilaku and one in Mande refused to be interviewed

Table 5-2. Survey Target and Number of Respondent at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District

Number of Respondent per Sub District Respondent

Rancaekek Arjasari Majalaya Total

Sector 1 - - - 1

Sector 2 - 2 - 2

Sector 3 60 62 8 130

Sector 4 234 280 186 674

Hatchery 1 - - 1

Poultry Infrastructure 1 1

Poultry Slaughterhouse (TPA) 8 - 4 12

Collecting Point (TPnA) - - 6 6

Wet Market 2 - 2 4

As for the sector 4 average number of poultry ownership for each household, the

proportion of household keeping poultry, and the number of household in the six

surveyed sub districts will be conveyed in the sub chapter of sector 4 poultry profile.

B. Poultry Sector Location

1/ Cianjur District

a. Geographical Condition

In general, the three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur (Mande, Cilaku, and

Karangtengah) were located on the same expanse with relatively medium elevation;

i.e. about 380 m asl. The elevation data can be seen in the next Table 5-3.

Table 5-3. Elevation of Three Sampled Sub Districts in Cianjur District

Elevation (m asl) Sub District

Minimum Maximum Average

Mande 211 794 382

Cilaku 345 497 416

Karangtengah 285 413 342

Average 380

Figure 5-1 shows the geographic position of all poultry sector components that

had been surveyed at the three sub districts including sector 1, 2, 3, 4 farms,

slaughterhouse (TPA), collecting point (TPnA), wet market, and regional office for

animal and fish farming (Dinas) which was the component for poultry infrastructure.

All locations of poultry sector components were connected one another by the road

facility. The roads varied in condition; from asphalt road, rocky road, to dirt road; all

were fit for large four-wheeled vehicle (truck) cruising that adequately support the

process of production input-output, marketing of output/yield, and Dinas access for

surveillance and service. Furthermore; in Karangtengah and Cilaku; there were two


21 | P A G E

lines of provincial street which were the main inter-provincial connecting highway road

of West Java and DKI Jakarta provinces. These conditions were very advantageous for

poultry sector activities on the three sub districts.

In Mande there was one farm of sector 1, two farms of sector 2, and ten farms of

sector 3. In Cilaku there were two farms of sector 2 and 28 farms of sector 3. While in

Karangtengah there was one farm of sector 2 and 6 of sector 3.

The geographic distribution of sector 3 poultry farms in the three sub districts

(Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah) in Cianjur can be seen in Figure 5-2 to Figure 5-4.

Figure 5-2 tells us the sector 3 farms of Mande sub district were focused on the central

part of the whole sub district region and there were no farm to find in the western and

eastern part of this sub district. On the other two sub districts; Cilaku (Figure 5-3) and

Karangtengah (Figure 5-4); the sector 3 farms were relatively distributed equally to the

whole sub districts area.

In Mande, Cilaku, and Karangtengah, the average distance of one commercial

farm to the other nearest farm estimated by the farmers was 704±477 m, 979±1231 m,

and 1900±1614 m respectively. In Karangtengah, that distance was already according

to the technical minimum requirement and the regional law. But in Mande and Cilaku,

those distances were less than 1,000 meter; which means that they did not exactly

play it by the book. Especially in Mande where it had one parent stock farm (sector 1)

which should require high biosecurity requirements, then the minimum distance

should be taken seriously into account.

b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

Sector 1

In Cianjur district survey area there was only one farm of sector 1; i.e. in Mande

sub district. The poultry population in this farm was 226,377 birds with the

composition of 77,716 layers and 148,661 broilers (see Figure 5-5). By the total area of

7,707.2 ha, then the poultry population density of sector 1 in Mande was up to 29.4

poultry/ha (Figure 5-6).


22 | P A G E

Figure 5-1. Poultry Sector Geographical Distribution in Cianjur District


23 | P A G E

Figure 5-2. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Mande Sub District


24 | P A G E

Figure 5-3. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Cilaku Sub District


25 | P A G E

Figure 5-4. Geographical Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farm in Karangtengah Sub District


26 | P A G E

Figure 5-5. Poultry Population of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District

Figure 5-6. Poultry Population Density of Sector 1 in Mande Sub District

Sector 2

Most of the poultry in sector 2 farms in the surveyed area was of layer type. The

layer population in Mande and Karangtengah was 200,000 birds and 42,000 birds

respectively. And the broiler type in Cilaku sub district recorded the number of 85,000

birds. In the whole sense, the total number of sector 2 poultry in the three sub

districts was lower than the actual condition since there were two sector 2 farmers

who refused to be interviewed; i.e. one farmer in Mande and one in Cilaku. The

highest number of poultry population density of sector 2 was found in Mande sub

district which was 26.0 poultry/ha and the lowest was found Karangtengah sub district

which was 7.4 poultry/ha (the area of Karangtengah sub district was 5,670.6 ha).

The population and poultry population density of sector 2 farms in the three sub

districts surveyed can be seen in Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8.


27 | P A G E

Figure 5-7. Poultry Population Density of Sector 2 Farm in Cianjur District

Figure 5-8. Poultry Population Density of Sector 2 Farm in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur

Sector 3

In the case for sector 3 farms; the poultry population in Cilaku sub district was

relatively higher than in the other sub districts which was 484,616 birds. The lowest

number of population was found in Karangtengah sub district, i.e. 177,800 birds.

Poultry population density of sector 3 farms in Cilaku sub district was 96.1 poultry/ha

(by the total Cilaku area of 5,041.8 ha) that was higher than in Mande sub district

(53.9 poultry/ha) and Karangtengah sub district (31.4 poultry/ha).

There were two farms in Cilaku sub district that refused to be interviewed. Even

so, this condition did not affect the total number of sector 3 poultry around the sub

district since both farms had been inoperative.

The poultry population and density data of sector 3 farms in the three sub

districts surveyed can be seen in Figure 5-9 and Figure 5-10.


28 | P A G E

Figure 5-9. Total Poultry Population of Sector 3 Farms in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur

Figure 5-10. Poultry Density of Sector 3 Farms in Three Sub Districts of Cianjur

Based on the poultry type; it seems that most of the sector 3 farms in the three

sub districts surveyed chose broiler for the core business. The percentage of broiler in

the three sub districts was much higher than the layer which was 63% in Mande sub

district, 97% in Cilaku sub district, and 88% in Karangtengah sub district respectively.

The composition of poultry population of sector 3 farms in the three sub districts

can be seen in the following Figure 5-11 to Figure 5-13.


29 | P A G E

Figure 5-11. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Mande Sub District

Figure 5-12. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Cilaku Sub District

Figure 5-13. Poultry Composition of Sector 3 Farms by Poultry Type in Karangtengah Sub District

The number and poultry population density for the three sector farms (1, 2, and

3) in each sub district can be seen in Table 5-4 and Figure 5-14. The highest number of

poultry population among the three sector farms was found in Mande sub district; i.e.

834,377 birds and the lowest was in Karangtengah sub district with 218,000 birds.


30 | P A G E

While for the poultry population density of Mande and Cilaku was relatively the same;

i.e. 108.3 poultry/ha and 113.0 birds /ha respectively.

According to the geographical distribution characteristics, the above poultry

population number and density show that Cilaku and Mande sub districts were the

main poultry industry center in Cianjur district.

Table 5-4. Area, Poultry Population Number and Density in the Three Sub District of Cianjur

Population

per Sector (bird)

Population Density per

Sector (bird/ha) Sub District Area (ha)

Sector

1

Sector

2

Sector

3

Total of

Population

Sector 1,2 &

3 (bird) Sector

1

Sector

2

Sector

3

Total

Population

Density

Sector 1,2 &

3 (bird/ha)

Mande 7,707 226,377 200,000 408,000 834,377 29.4 26 52.9 108.3

Cilaku 5,041 - 85,000 484,616 569,616 - 16.9 96.1 113

Karangtengah 5,670 - 42,000 177,800 219,800 - 7.4 31.4 38.8

Figure 5-14. The Poultry Density in the Three Surveyed Sub Districts of Cianjur

2/ Bandung District

a. Geographical Condition

In general, the two surveyed sub districts in Bandung; Majalaya and Rancaekek;

were located on the same expanse with relatively low to medium elevation; i.e. 672 m

asl (see Table 5-5). Besides being used as poultry business, Majalaya Rancaekek sub

districts were also packed with community’s housing and the center for textile and

garment industries of Bandung district. Geographically, these two sub districts directly

bordered one another; while the Arjasari sub district was located more to the west and

was separated by Ciparay and Pacet sub districts. The Arjasari geographical condition

was more characterized by hilly feature with relatively higher elevation (966 m asl)

than the other two sub districts.

Table 5-5. Elevation of Three Sampled Sub Districts in Bandung District

Elevation (m asl) Sub District

Minimum Maximum Average

Arjasari 672 1278 966

Majalaya 664 722 677

Rancaekek 661 681 667

Average 770


31 | P A G E

Figure 5-15 shows the geographical position of all components of poultry sector

that had been surveyed including farms of sector 2, 3, 4, TPA, TPnA, wet market, and

Dinas office which acted as poultry infrastructure component. Each location of such

poultry sector supporting components had been well-connected to one another by

mean of road facility. The roads varied in condition; from asphalt road, rocky road, to

dirt road; all were fit for large four-wheeled vehicle (truck) cruising that adequately

support the process of production input-output, marketing of output/yield, and Dinas

access for surveillance and service. But in some locations of sector 3 farms located

around Arjasari; there was a connecting access road which was very rocky and narrow.

This inflicted certain difficulties in the process of production input flow, marketing of

output/yield, as well as Dinas access for surveillance and service.


32 | P A G E

Figure 5-15. Geographical Distribution of Poultry Sector in Bandung District


33 | P A G E

In Arjasari sub district, there were two farms of sector 2 and 62 farms of sector 3.

In Rancaekek sub district, there was one farm of sector 1 (hatchery) and 60 farms of

sector 3. While in Majalaya sub district, there were eight farms of sector 3.

The geographical distribution of sector 3 poultry in the three sub districts

surveyed in Bandung can be seen in Figure 5-17 to Figure 5-19. Figure 5-17 indicates

the location of sector 3 poultry farms in Arjasari sub district that was relatively

distributed throughout the sub district area. This was also the case for sector 3 poultry

farms in Rancaekek sub district (see Figure 5-18). While the sector 3 farms distribution

in Majalaya sub district was more concentrated in the southern areas that bordered

with Ibun sub district (see Figure 5-19).

In Arjasari, Rancaekek, and Majalaya; the average distance of one commercial

farm to the other nearest farm estimated by farmers was 508±529 m, 359±593 m, and

682±802 m respectively. They were technically not idealistic for farm management

and had disregarded the law of minimum distance requirement for farm management

(i.e. minimum of 1,000 meter to one another).

b. Population Number, Density, and Composition

Sector 1

In the three surveyed sub districts of Bandung district; there was no sector 1

farm found. The hatchery farm found in this area had activity in only in hatchery and

did not have its own farm with the capacity of 15,000 eggs per hatchery cycle. This

makes the population data of number, density, and composition unavailable to be

presented in this report.

Sector 2

In the survey areas, there were only two sector 2 poultry farms located in

Arjasari sub district. The poultry type ventured was layer with the total number of

population up to 120,000 birds (see Figure 5-16). The Arjasari sub district was about

5,217 ha, this makes the sector 2 poultry density to be 23 poultry/ha (see Figure 5-20).

Figure 5-16. The Sector 2 Poultry Population in Three Sub Districts of Bandung District


34 | P A G E

Figure 5-17. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Arjasari Sub District


35 | P A G E

Figure 5-18. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Majalaya Sub District


36 | P A G E

Figure 5-19. Geographic Distribution of Sector 3 Poultry Farms in Rancaekek Sub District


37 | P A G E

Figure 5-20. The Sector 2 Poultry Density in Three Sub Districts of Bandung District

23.0

0.0 0.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

Bird

s/H

ecta

re

Arjasari Majalaya Rancaekek

P oultry Dens ity of S ec tor 2

Sector 3

In the survey area, the highest number of poultry population for sector 3 was in

Arjasari sub district; which amounted to 589,000 birds and the lowest number of

population was found in Majalaya sub district, 44,222 birds. The high number of

population in Arjasari was related to the number of operating sector 3 farms that was

actually higher than the other two surveyed sub districts. The sector 3 poultry

population density in this sub district was 112.9 poultry/ha; which was also higher than

the density number in Majalaya (17.7 poultry/ha) and Rancaekek (15.8 poultry/ha).

During the survey, there were several farms that could not be interviewed; i.e.

11 farms in Arjasari sub district and 7 farms in Rancaekek sub district. Even so, this

condition did not affect the total number of sector 3 poultry in the area since those

farms had been inoperative.

The population number and density of sector 3 farm in the three sub districts

under survey can be seen in Figure 5-21 and Figure 5-22.

Figure 5-21. Sector 3 Poultry Population in Three Sub Districts in Bandung District


38 | P A G E

Figure 5-22. Sector 3 Poultry Density in Three Sub Districts in Bandung District

112.90

17.7015.80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Bird

s/H

ecta

re

A rjasari Majalaya Rancaekek

P oultry Dens ity of S ec tor 3

According to the ventured poultry type, it indicates the sector 3 poultry

population in Arjasari sub district was dominated by broiler; i.e. 98% of total poultry

population. On the other hand, the layer type dominated in Majalaya and Rancaekek

sub districts with respectively 73% and 56% of total poultry population. Beside those

two types of poultry, Rancaekek sub district also had many farmers who ventured on

other kind of poultry intensively such as laying duck, meat duck, kampong (native)

chicken and laying arabian chicken.

The sector 3 poultry population composition data at three sub districts surveyed

can be seen in Figure 5-23 to Figure 5-25.

Figure 5-23. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Arjasari Sub District


39 | P A G E

Figure 5-24. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Majalaya Sub District

Figure 5-25. Composition of Sector 3 Poultry Type in Rancaekek Sub District

The poultry population number and density of the three sectors (1, 2, and 3) at

each surveyed sub district can be seen in

Table 5-6 and Figure 5-26.

Such a table indicates that the highest poultry population number for the three

sectors was found in Arjasari sub district; i.e. 709,000 birds with the density of

135.9 poultry/ha. While in Majalaya and Rancaekek, the poultry population was

44,222 birds and 78,319 birds respectively, with the density of 17.7 birds and 15.8

birds.

The poultry number and density in Arjasari show that this sub district had

become one of poultry industry centers for broiler around Bandung district. And

Rancaekek sub district was characterized by more of sector 3 farms with a more

diversified type of poultry.


40 | P A G E

Table 5-6. Area and Poultry Population Density at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District

Population

per Sector (bird)

Population Density per

Sector (bird/ha) Sub District Area (ha)

Sector

1

Sector

2 Sector

3

Total of

Population

Sector 1,2

& 3 (bird)

Sector

1

Sector

2 Sector

3

Total

Population

Density

Sector 1,2

& 3

(bird/ha)

Arjasari 5,217 - 120,000 589,000 709,000 - 23 112.9 135.9

Majalaya 2,494 - - 44,222 44,222 - - 17.7 17.7

Rancaekek 4,947 - - 78,319 78,319 - - 15.8 15.8

Figure 5-26. Poultry Population Density at Three Sub Districts in Bandung District

135.9

17.7 15.8

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Bird

s/H

ecta

re

Arjasari Majalaya Rancaekek

Poultry Density in Bandung District

Sector 1

Sector 2

Sector 3

Total

C. Disease History

The cases of Avian Influenza (AI), ND, and Gumboro (IBD); within the last three

years at three sub districts of Cianjur and Bandung; can be seen on Table 5-7. For the

last three years, there had been no case of the above diseases found in the sector 1

poultry farm; both in Cianjur district as well as in Bandung district.

There was no case of AI and ND found during the last three years in poultry of

sector 2 at both districts. As for the case of Gumboro; according to the farmers; it

occurred at two farms in Cilaku sub district. These cases were only confirmed by

clinical symptoms observed by farmers.

For sector 3 poultry; there was a difference in AI case condition between the two

districts. Within the last three years, Mande sub district (of Cianjur) had only suffered

from AI at one broiler farm which was confirmed by private veterinarian; while in

Rancaekek (of Bandung) the AI cases were found in five layer farms; four of which

were confirmed by local private and dinas veterinarian and one case only by clinical

symptoms observed by farmers.

The ND disease; for the last three years; occurred in poultry farms of sector 3 at

Mande (2 farms), at Cilaku (1 farm), Rancaekek (7 farms), and Arjasari (5 farms). The

gumboro disease; which had caused rather high mortality; occurred at several farms of

sector 3 in the whole surveyed sub districts in Cianjur and Bandung; i.e. in Mande (2

farms), Karangtengah (4 farms), Cilaku (10 farms), Rancaekek (10 farms), Majalaya (4

farms), and Arjasari (18 farms).


41 | P A G E

Disease cases with symptoms similar to AI; within the last three years also

happened in two collecting points (TPnA), two slaughterhouses (TPA), and two wet

markets; all were in Majalaya sub district of Bandung.

Table 5-7. Last-Three-Year Disease History of Poultry Sector in Cianjur and Bandung

Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Slaughterhouse Collecting

Point Wet Market

District Sub District

AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD AI ND IBD

Karangtengah - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - -

Mande - - - - - - 1 2 2 - - - - - - - - - Cianjur

Cilaku - - - - - 2 - 1 10 - - - - - - - - -

Arjasari - - - - - - - 5 18 - - - - - - - - -

Rancaekek - - - - - - 5 7 10 - - - - - - - - - Bandung

Majalaya - - - - - - - - 4 2 - - 2 - - 2 - -

Notes:

AI : Avian Influenza

ND : Newcastle Disease

IBD : Infectious Bursal Disease

The percentage of poultry sector 3 suffering from AI, ND, and IBD for the last

three years is presented in Table 5-8. The table shows that the average number of

sector 3 farms suffered from AI in the last three years around the three surveyed sub

districts of Bandung district was relatively higher than of Cianjur district; i.e. 4.5% and

2.3% respectively. The case was also the same for ND disease. On the other hand, for

IBD, the average number of sector 3 farms in Cianjur which suffered from it was 37.2%

that was higher than in Bandung district (28.6%).

Table 5-8. Percentage of AI, ND, and IBD Occurrence at Sector 3 Farm in the Last Three Years

Number of Farm

AI ND IBD

Sub District

Answered Not

Answered

Total No. of

Case %*

No. of

Case %*

No. of

Case %*

Cianjur District

Karangtengah

Mande

Cilaku

7

10

26

-

-

2

7

10

28

-

1

-

-

10.0

-

-

2

1

-

20.0

3.8

4

2

10

57.1

20.0

38.5

Total 43 2 45 1 2.3 3 7.0 16 37.2

Bandung District

Arjasari

Rancaekek

Majalaya

51

53

8

11

7

-

62

60

8

-

5

-

-

9.4

-

5

7

-

9.8

13.2

-

18

10

4

35.3

18.9

50.0

Total 112 18 130 5 4.5 12 10.7 32 28.6

Note: *Percentage was calculated by the number of farmer who answered the questionnaire

The disease map of AI, ND, and IBD which attacked sector 3 farms within the last

three years in areas of Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in Figure 5-27 and

Figure 5-28.


42 | P A G E

Table 5-9. Distribution of AI, ND, and IBD Diseases by Poultry Type at Sector Farm in The Last Three Years

AI ND IBD

District Sub District Farm No.

Farm No.

Case %

No.

Case %

No.

Case %

Karangtengah Broiler 6 3 42.86

Layer 1 1 14.29

Total 7 4 57.14

Mande Broiler 6 1 10 1 10 2 20

Layer 3 1 10

Unknown 1

Total 10 1 10 2 20 2 20

Cilaku Broiler 24 1 3.57 10 35.71

Layer 1

Quail 1

Unknown 2

Cianjur

Total 28 1 3.57 10 35.71

Arjasari Broiler 49 5 8.06 18 29.03

Layer 2

Laying Duck 1

Unknown 10

Total 62 5 8.06 18 29.03

Rancaekek Broiler 8 1 1.67

Layer 10 3 5 4 6.67 5 8.33

Laying Duck 20

Kampong chicken 3 1 1.67 1 1.67

Arabian chicken 6 1 1.67 1 1.67

Kampong and

arabian chicken 1

Meat duck 2

Unknown 10 2 3.33 1 1.67 2 3.33

Total 60 5 8.33 7 11.67 10 16.67

Majalaya Broiler 1 1 12.5

Layer 6 3 37.5

Laying duck 1

Bandung

Total 8 4 50

Total 175 6 3.43 15 8.57 48 27.43


43 | P A G E

Figure 5-27. Map of AI, ND, and IBD Disease Attacking Sector 3 Farms in the Last Three Years in Cianjur District


44 | P A G E

Figure 5-28. Map of AI, ND, and IBD Disease Attacking Sector 3 Farms in the Last Three Years in Bandung District


45 | P A G E

D. Vaccination Program

Poultry immunization against diseases is done through vaccination. The AI, ND,

and IBD vaccination program information on sector 1 farm was not available during the

survey; neither in Cianjur nor in Bandung. Two farms of sector 2 in Arjasari sub district

(Bandung district) had applied regular vaccination program to work against AI, ND, and

IBD. This makes the vaccination in the sector 2 for such diseases had been fully

covered (100%) in this sub district. Meanwhile for Cianjur district, the average

vaccination coverage in sector 2 toward AI, ND, and IBD in the three surveyed sub

districts was about 75%, 100%, and 50% respectively.

Data of vaccination program for sector 2 in Cianjur and Bandung districts against

AI, ND, and IBD can be seen in Table 5-10.

Table 5-10. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD on Sector 2 Farm in Cianjur and Bandung Districts

Number of Farm

AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

Sub District

Answered Not

Answered Total

Number

of Farm %

Number

of Farm %

Number

of Farm %

Cianjur District

Karangtengah

Mande

Cilaku

1

1

2

0

1

1

1

2

3

1

1

1

100.0

100.0

50.0

1

1

2

100.0

100.0

100.0

-

-

2

-

-

100.0

Total 4 2 6 3 75.0 4 100.0 2 50.0

Bandung District

Arjasari

Rancaekek

Majalaya

2

0

0

0

0

0

2

2

-

-

100.0

-

-

2

-

-

100.0

-

-

2

-

-

100.0

-

-

Total 0 0 2 100.0 2 100.0 2 100.0


Vaccination program for AI, ND, and IBD was also applied to most of the farms of

sector 3 around the surveyed areas. Table 5-11 indicates that the average vaccination

coverage over ND in sector 3 around the three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur was

relatively higher than in Bandung; i.e. 95.3% and 72.3% respectively. This is also the

case for IBD vaccination; the average vaccination coverage for that disease in Cianjur

(88.4%) was relatively higher than in Bandung (70.5%). As for AI, the average rata-rata

vaccination coverage in the three surveyed sub districts in Bandung district (40.2%)

was a little higher than in Cianjur district (32.6%).

Table 5-11. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 Farm in Cianjur and Bandung

Number of Farm

AI Vaccination ND Vaccination IBD Vaccination

Sub District

Answered Not

Answered Total

Number

of Farm %

Number

of Farm %

Number

of Farm %

Cianjur District

Karangtengah

Mande

Cilaku

7

10

26

0

0

2

7

10

28

1

5

8

14.3

50.0

30.8

7

10

24

100.0

100.0

92.3

7

9

22

100.0

90.0

84.6

Total 43 2 45 14 32.6 41 95.3 38 88.4

Bandung District

Arjasari

Rancaekek

Majalaya

51

53

8

11

7

0

68

60

8

14

25

6

27.4

47.2

75.0

46

28

7

90.2

52.8

87.5

48

24

7

94.1

45.1

87.5

Total 112 18 130 45 40.2 81 72.3 79 70.5



46 | P A G E

Figure 5-29. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 in Cianjur


47 | P A G E

Figure 5-30. Vaccination Program of AI, ND, and IBD for Sector 3 in Bandung


48 | P A G E

E. Production Input and Output Flow

1/ Sector 1 Farm

There were 2 enterprises of sector 1 in the surveyed areas; i.e. PT. Peternakan

Ayam Manggis in Mande sub district of Cianjur district which was a parent stock farm

and PT. Ciung Wanara in Rancaekek sub district of Bandung district which was a

hatchery.

a. Production Input Procurement

PT. Peternakan Ayam Manggis got its DOC from PT Hybro Indonesia; located in

Warung Kondang, Cianjur; and its feed from PT. Mega Prajasa Sentosa located at

Cikupa, Tangerang. As for vaccine, vitamin, and medicine needs they were supplied by

pharmacies like PT. Ceva, PT. Romindo, PT. SHS, PT. Swadesi, PT. Agro, and PT. Sanbe

Farma. Sources of eggs for the hatchery PT Ciung Wanara are not known.

b. Production Output Marketing

The yield of this company were broiler DOC, layer DOC, male layer DOC, rejected

egg, and spent hen. Broiler DOC and male layer was marketed to areas of Jabotabek

(Jakarta, and surrounding cities Bogor, Tangerang and Bekasi) and West Java, and layer

DOC was sold to Sulawesi, Kalimantan, Sumatera, Java, and Bali. The DOC marketing

was directly to commercial poultry farms or through poultry shops. The company

currently has regular customers; i.e. nine commercial poultry farms and six poultry

shops for its DOC product; seven commercial poultry farms and four poultry shops for

its layer DOC, and four commercial poultry farms and two poultry shops for male layer

DOC. Rejected eggs were marketed only around Cianjur district and spent hen was

sold to Jabotabek and West Java. The rejected egg consumers were bakeries,

restaurants, caterers, and some were directly sold in markets. Spent hen product was

directly fetched to eight distributors in the market.

The sector 1 marketing and poultry product volume in the surveyed areas of

Cianjur can be seen in Table 5-12.

Table 5-12. The Marketing and Poultry Product Volume of Sector 1 around Cianjur District

Customer No. Product

Type Total Marketing Area Volume

1 DOC broiler Commercial farm

Poultry shop

9

6

Jabotabek

West Java

81,600 poultry/week

2 DOC layer Commercial farm

Poultry shop

7

4

Sulawesi

Kalimantan

Java

Bali

39,168 poultry/week

3 Male Layer DOC Commercial farm

Poultry shop

4

2

Jabotabek

West Java

41,000 poultry/week

4 Rejected egg Bakeries, restaurants,

caterers, and households

Cianjur 1,296 eggs/week

5 Spent hen Distributors at market 8 Jabotabek

West Java

5,125 poultry/month

PT. Ciung Wanara hatchery farm marketed its DOC product to Tasikmalaya,

Ciamis, and Bandung. Hatchery was done in Mondays and Thursdays with the volume


49 | P A G E

production volume around 15,000–30,000 poultry/hatchery cycle. It was done by 10

hatchery machine with the capacity of 15,000 eggs/machine.

The product marketing flow of sector 1 poultry farm can be seen in the following

figure.

Figure 5-31. Product Marketing Flow of Sector 1 Poultry Farm

Grand Parent Stock

Parent Stock

DOC (broiler, layer,

male layer)Rejected Egg Spent Hen

Poultry

Shop

Commercial

Farms

(sector 2 and

sector 3)

Bakeries

Restaurants

Caterers

End Consumers

Market

Small Traders

The map of sector 1 poultry production input and output in the surveyed areas of

Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in the Figure 5-32.

2/ Sector 2 Farm

In the surveyed area, there were seven sector 2 farms; five in Cianjur district and

two in Bandung district. In Cianjur, the sector 2 farms included two broiler farms and

three layer farms. As for the sector 2 farms in Bandung, they were all layer farms.


The broiler farm in Cianjur survey area obtained DOC input through self-seedling

by its mother company located in the same area or outside Cianjur district; whereas

the layer farm obtained pullet supply from areas of Jakarta and Cianjur. The layer farm

in Bandung surveyed area obtained the pullet from PT. Japfa Comfeed in Tangerang.

All broiler and layer farms in both survey area obtained the poultry feed directly

from the factory; i.e. PT. Charoen Pokphand in Tangerang, PT. Sierad Produce Tbk., and

PT. Japfa Indonesia Tbk. The vaccine need was supplied by PT. SHS, PT. CEVA, PT.

Vaccinedo, and PT. Sierad Produce Tbk. As for the vitamin and medicine needs, the

farms of Cianjur obtained them from PT SHS, PT. Romindo, PT. Ima, PT. Sanbe; while

the two farms in Bandung applied herbal medicines for medication.


50 | P A G E

Figure 5-32. Map of Sector 1 Poultry Production Input-Output Flow in Cianjur and Bandung Districts


51 | P A G E


In Cianjur district, the broiler farm marketed their live poultry to the surrounding

market, and to Bandung, Jakarta, Bogor, and Sukabumi with the average marketing

volume about 212,500 poultry/year. The consumers were poultry collectors,

agents/distributors in wet market, slaughterhouses (TPA); some directly did the

slaughtering at their own slaughterhouses and stored them into cold storage and sell

them in carcass form. The layer farms marketed their product to the surrounding

markets, Bandung, and Jakarta with the average production volume about 1,637.5

ton/year.

Layer farms in Bandung district marketed their egg product to the surrounding

market, Banjar, and Ciparay with the average production volume about 730 ton/year.

Spent hens from layer farms in Cianjur district were usually sold directly to

agents in wet markets in Jakarta and Lampung areas with the average product volume

about 35,500 poultry/cycle. The live poultry from broiler farms in Cianjur, Bandung,

Jakarta, Bogor, and Sukabumi with the average marketing rata volume about 212,500

poultry/year. The consumers were collectors, agents in wet markets, slaughterhouse

(TPA), and poultry slaughterhouse (RPA), and some directly cut them in their own

slaughterhouse and put them in cold storage and sold them in carcass form.

The flow of production marketing in sector 2 layer farms can be seen in Figure

5-33; while the Figure 5-34 shows the flow of production marketing of sector 2 broiler

farms.

Figure 5-33. Sector 2 Layer Farms Flow of Production Marketing


52 | P A G E

Figure 5-34. Sector 2 Broiler Farms Flow of Production Marketing

The map of sector 2 farm production input and output flow in Cianjur and

Bandung districts can be seen in Figure 5-35.

3/ Sector 3 Farm

There were 175 sector 3 farms throughout the surveyed areas; i.e. 45 farms in

three sub districts of Cianjur district and 130 farms in three sub districts of Bandung

district.


The sector 3 farms in the surveyed sub districts of Cianjur district consisted of

five layer farms, 39 broiler farms, and one quail farm. Most of the layer and broiler

farms got the DOC from Sukabumi district (40%) and Cianjur district (35%); while the

rest got it from Purwakarta district (7.5%), Jakarta (7.5%), Wonokoyo district of East

Java (2.5%), Bogor (2.5%), Karawang (2.5%) and Tangerang (2.5%). As for the pullet

needs; the layer farms got them from local resource (60%) and Jakarta (40%). The

quail seedling was obtained from Sukabumi district.

For the feed requirement; most of the farms directly acquired it from the factory

in Bogor, Cirebon, Wonokoyo (East Java), Serang (Banten), Bekasi, Jakarta, and

Tangerang. Only the quail farm got feed from poultry shop in Cianjur.

Most of the layer and broiler farmer in Cianjur obtained vaccine directly from PT.

Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Satwa Java Jaya, PT. HIPFA, and PT. Vaccinedo. The

vitamin and medicine were also obtained directly from pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT.

Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Swadesi, PT. Sanbe, PT. Romindo, PT. Multi Satwa Medika, PT.

Radivit, PT. Avindo, PT. Agro Makmur Sentosa, PT. Satwa Java Jaya, PT. Male, and

Dugok RI Chung Chen Nam, Korea. All the mentioned companies were located in

Jakarta, Bogor, Tangerang, and Bandung. There was only one broiler farm and one

quail farm that obtained the medication needs through local poultry shop.


53 | P A G E

Figure 5-35. Map of Sector 2 Farm Production Input and Output Flow in Cianjur and Bandung Districts


54 | P A G E

The sector 3 farm type in the surveyed sub districts of Bandung district was more

diversified; i.e. besides broiler farms (55%) and layer farms (16%), there were also

laying duck farms (18%), meat duck farms (2%), kampong chicken farm (3%), and laying

arabian chicken farm (6%).

In Arjasari sub district, the broiler farmers procured DOC from Bandung,

Purwakarta, Subang, Jakarta, Tangerang, Cianjur, Bogor, Sukabumi, and Wonokoyo

(Malang, East Java). Layer farmers obtained pullet from Purwakarta, and laying duck

farmers purchased pullet from farmers around local sub district.

In Majalaya sub district, broiler farmers secured their DOC from areas of Subang.

Layer farmers and laying duck farmers had their pullet from the local core farmers and

other farmers.

In Rancaekek, the types of poultry were even more diversified than the other

two sub districts. Besides broiler and layer, farmers in the area also ventured on laying

arabian chicken, kampong chicken, laying duck, and meat duck. Laying arabian chicken

(of Hyland type) was obtained from Kediri (East Java) and Garut. Kampong chicken

(super type) farmers produced their own DOC. Laying duck farmers got their DOC

from farmers of other sub district in Bandung district; i.e. from Sukamanah, Majalaya,

Lembang, and from Tasikmalaya district. Meat duck farmers were supplied with DOC

from Cianjur and Magelang (Central Java). As for broiler farmers, they obtained DOC

from Sukabumi and Bandung; and layer farmers got their pullet from Tangerang,

Serang, and Bandung.

Self-supporting broiler and layer farmers got their feed from feed factories in

Bogor, Cirebon, Wonokoyo (East Java), Serang (Banten), Bekasi, Jakarta and Tangerang

or from poultry shop around Bandung district. On the other hand, plasma farmers

obtained feed from the core farmer in Bandung, Tangerang, and Serang. As for laying

arabian chicken, the feed was obtained from poultry shop located in Garut and

Sumedang. Kampong chicken farmers got the feed from poultry shops in Bandung and

feed factories in Cianjur. The laying duck farmers obtained the feed (dedak) from the

local paddy milling factory.

For the vaccine needs, the self-supporting layer and broiler farmers directly

fetched them from pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, and PT.

Vaccinedo, or from the poultry shop in Bandung area. The laying arabian chicken

farmers had their vaccine fulfilled from the distributor of PT. Medion and local Dinas

Peternakan. Kampong chicken farmers obtained the vaccine from Dinas Peternakan

and agent in Cianjur; while laying and meat duck farmers did not apply vaccination to

their flock.

The vitamins and medicines for self-supporting layer and broiler farmers were

generally supplied by pharmacies like PT. Medion, PT. Mensana, PT. SHS, PT. Sanbe, PT.

Romindo, PT. APE Bandung, PT. Biotek Indonesia, PT. Agrinusa Unggul Jaya, PT.

Univetama Dinamika, and PT. Intravet. These companies were located in Jakarta,

Bogor, Tangerang, Bekasi, and Bandung. Furthermore, besides directly from those

companies, farmers also obtained them from poultry shops and agents around

Bandung. The laying arabian chicken farmers got the vitamins and medicines from the

distributor of PT. Medion and local Dinas Peternakan; while kampong chicken farmers

had them from the Dinas Peternakan and agents in Cianjur and Tasikmalaya. Most


55 | P A G E

duck farmers did not supply their flock with vitamins and medicines and some farmers

who used vitamins and medicines obtained them from the local poultry shops.


In the three surveyed sub districts of Cianjur district, broiler farmers marketed

their live poultry to collectors, agents in wet market, poultry slaughterhouse (TPA and

RPA). There were also farmers who sold poultry in carcass form by doing the

slaughtering in their own slaughterhouse. The marketing target location included

areas of Cianjur, Bandung, Jakarta, Sukabumi, and Bogor. The average production

volume per year was up to 163,000 poultry per farmer in Mande sub district; 46,100

poultry per farmer in Karangtengah sub district; and 42,409 poultry per farmer in

Cilaku sub district.

The layer farmers marketed their egg yield to wet markets and restaurants in

Cianjur and Jakarta with the average production volume per year about 489,750 ton

per farmer in Mande sub district; 2,372.5 ton per farmer in Karangtengah sub district;

and 6,043.35 ton per farmer in Cilaku sub district. The spent hens from the farm were

sold to agents or to traders in wet market around Cianjur, Jakarta, Bogor, and

Sukabumi with the average selling volume per year of 20,000 poultry per farmer in

Mande sub district and 2,000 poultry per farmer in Karangtengah sub district. While

the male layer poultry from the layer farms in Mande sub district were sold to RPA

around Cianjur with the average selling volume of 170 poultry per farmer per year.

In the surveyed areas of Bandung district, the self-supporting broiler farmers sold

their live poultry to collectors, agents in wet market, and slaughterhouses (TPA and

RPA), while the plasma farmers sold them to core farmers located in Bandung,

Tangerang, and Serang. The target marketing sites included Bandung, Jakarta,

Majalengka, Cianjur, Garut and Depok with the average production volume per year

about 64,790 poultry per farmer in Arjasari sub district; 262,800 poultry per farmer in

Majalaya sub district; and 4,333 poultry per farmer Rancaekek sub district.

The layer farms marketed their egg yield to wet markets and restaurants around

the local area, to Sumedang, and to Majalengka with the average production volume

per year about 50,000 ton per farmer in Arjasari sub district; 46.7 ton per farmer in

Majalaya sub district; and 55.96 ton per farmer in Rancaekek sub district. The spent

hens from the farms were sold to agents and traders in wet market around areas of

Bandung, Cianjur, Garut, and Tasikmalaya with the average selling volume per year

about 7,900 poultry per farmer in Majalaya sub district and 690 poultry per farmer in

Rancaekek sub district. The male layer poultry were sold to agents or trader in wet

market around Bandung with the average selling volume per year about 1,000 poultry

per farmer in Majalaya sub district and 325 poultry per farmer in Rancaekek sub

district.

The marketing flow of layer and broiler in sector 3 farms was the same with the

one in sector 2 farms; see the above Figure 5-33 and Figure 5-34.

The farmers of laying arabian and kampong chicken in Rancaekek sub district

sold their live poultry (meat and spent laying poultry) to collectors in wet market

around Bandung with the average selling volume per year about 22,500 meat arabian

chicken, 50 spent arabian hen, 51,120 meat ‘super’ kampong chicken, 33 spent


56 | P A G E

kampong hens, and 3,180 spent laying ducks. The egg yield from laying arabian

chicken farms was sold to Bandung areas with the average selling volume of 6.9 ton

per farm per year. While duck eggs were sold to areas of Bandung and Majalengka

with the average selling volume about 4 ton per farm per year.

The flow of arabian kampong chicken yield marketing can be seen in the

following Figure 5-36.

Figure 5-36. Flow of Sector 3 Arabian and Kampong Chicken Farm Yield Marketing

The flow of sector 3 duck farm yield marketing can be seen in the following

Figure 5-37.

Figure 5-37. Flow of Sector 3 Duck Farm Yield Marketing

The map of production input and output flow of the sector 3 farms around the

surveyed area of Cianjur and Bandung districts can be seen in the following Figure 5-38

and Figure 5-39.


57 | P A G E

Figure 5-38. Map of Production Input and Output Flow of Sector 3 Farms in Cianjur District


58 | P A G E

Figure 5-39. Map of Production Input and Output Flow of Sector 3 Farms in Bandung District


59 | P A G E

4/ Wet market, Slaughterhouse, and Poultry Collector

In the surveyed areas of Bandung district, there were four wet markets; they

were Rancaekek Market and Wahana Karya Market in Rancaekek sub district and Pasar

Baru Market and Pasar Stasiun Market in Majalaya sub district. In Cianjur district there

were two wet markets; they were Terminal Lama Market and Mardiyuana Market.

In the wet market of Rancaekek sub district, there was no live poultry trader

since the application of the local government’s law on banning live poultry trading in

wet markets. Traders in wet market of Majalaya sub district, besides selling live

poultry they also provided the slaughtering service. Therefore, the poultry buying

from the collecting site, the slaughtering process, and the selling in carcass form were

done at relatively the same spot (market). The types of poultry sold in the market

were kampong chicken, duck, and broiler.

Kampong chicken and duck poultry in the wet market of Majalaya sub district

were collected from Bandung (Majalaya, Ibun, and Cibeureum sub districts), Garut,

and Tasikmalaya districts. The selling volume of kampong chicken per day in average

was about 37 poultry per trader and duck was 30 poultry per trader. Broiler chicken

were obtained from farms around Majalaya sub district with the average daily selling

volume about 80 poultry per trader. The consumers of this market were restaurants,

caterers, retail/small eatery, processed food trader (chicken porridge, chicken noodle,

etc.), and households around Majalaya area.

There were also poultry collector traders in Majalaya sub district wet market,

selling broiler or kampong chicken. These broiler collector obtained live poultry from

the surrounding farms or poultry shop in Majalaya and Lampegan sub districts (of

Bandung district) with the range of selling volume per trader about 100 kg – 800 kg per

day. The consumers were carcass traders in the wet market of Majalaya sub district,

restaurants, caterers, and slaughterhouse (TPA) venturers. These kampong chicken

collectors got the poultry from the community around Majalaya sub district. The

consumers of these traders were retail traders, slaughterhouse (TPA) venturers, and

households with the range of selling volume about 50 – 150 poultry per day per trader.

The slaughterhouse (TPA) companies existed in Rancaekek sub district were

generally small-scale industries (household) and they directly marketed their

commodity to Rancaekek and Pasar Wahana Karya markets. The slaughterhouse

obtained broiler from broiler farm or poultry shop around Bandung district (sub

districts of Majalaya, Banjar, Ciparay, Lembang, and Rancaekek), and Cianjur and

Tasikmalaya districts. The consumers of these slaughterhouse (TPA) were restaurants,

caterers, retail traders/small eateries, processed food traders (chicken porridge,

chicken noodle, etc.), and households around Rancaekek areas with the selling volume

ranging from 80 to 1,000 poultry per day per trader.

The type of live poultry sold in wet markets in the surveyed areas of Cianjur

district were kampong chicken, duck, muscovy duck and spent hens. Those poultry

were directly obtained by the traders from farmers around local areas such as from

Cibalagung, Mande, Cibeber, Cianjur Selatan, Warung Kondang, and Cilaku sub

districts. Besides the mentioned areas, some traders also got the merchandise from

Sukabumi district. The consumers of this market were households, restaurants, and


60 | P A G E

caterers from areas around the market with the average selling volume of kampong

chicken per day about 16 poultry per trader, duck about 17 poultry per trader,

muscovy duck about 13 poultry per trader, and spent hens 20 poultry per trader.

The collector traders in the surveyed areas were broiler traders. Live poultry was

obtained from broiler farms around Cianjur and Sukabumi districts with the average

buying volume about 880 poultry/day/trader. In general, those collector traders own

TPA that they also offered slaughtering service and sold in carcass form. Consumers of

these traders were restaurants, caterers, other traders and TPA venturers in the

surrounding areas with the average carcass selling volume about 463

poultry/day/trader and live poultry about rata 760 poultry/day/trader.

F. Sector 4 Farm Profile

1/ Farm Location

The information of sector 4 farmers in the three sub districts of Cianjur and

Bandung districts was collected from each of four sampled village for every sub

districts.

The data of the sampled four villages for each sub district and the number of

farmer respondents for every village can be seen in Table 5-13. The map of farm

location distribution on the four sampled villages sample at each surveyed sub district

can be seen in Figure 5-40 to Figure 5-45.

These maps show that most of the distribution of sector 4 farms at each point of

sampling location (RW) in every village was equally dispersed, in both surveyed Cianjur

and Bandung district. This sector 4 distribution condition at least shows us about the

general condition that applied at village level and local sub districts.

The poultry in sector 4 are dispersed throughout the whole village and this

makes providing animal health services, movement control and implementing

biosecurity measures very difficult.

Table 5-13. Sampled Villages and number of Respondent Per Village in Surveyed Sub District

Sub District Sampled Village Number of Sampling

Point (RW)

Number of

Respondent

(1) Maleber 4 115

(2) Subandar 4 94

(3) Bojong 4 109

Karangtengah

(4) Sukamanah 4 92

(1) Bobojong 4 128

(2) Cikidang Bayabang 4 120

(3) Jamali 4 133

Mande

(4) Kademangan 4 135

(1) Sirnagalih 4 139

(2) Rahong 4 123

(3) Ciharahas 4 159

Cilaku

(4) Sukasari 4 118

Total 48 1,465

(1) Pinggir sari 4 57

(2) Rancakole 4 106

(3) Arjasari 4 45

Arjasari

(4) Patrol Sari 4 61

(1) Bojong Loa 4 46

(2) Tegal Sumedang 4 63

Majalaya

(3) Haur Pugur 4 51


61 | P A G E

Sub District Sampled Village Number of Sampling

Point (RW)

Number of

Respondent

(4) Jelegong 4 58

(1) Majasetra 4 57

(2) Neglasari 4 47

(3) Majalaya 4 27

Rancaekek

(4) Wangi Sagara 4 56

Total 48 674

2/ Farm Characteristics

Poultry farming system in sector 4 farms were divided into four ways of poultry

keeping (1) poultry were kept in closed cages; (2) poultry were kept in cages with

fenced free-ranging area; (3) poultry were kept in fenced backyards of farmer’s house;

(4) poultry were allowed to roam freely (free-ranging) in backyards and to other areas

(refer to Table 5-14).

In the three sub districts that were surveyed in Cianjur District, most of the

poultry farming was by way of (1) and (2) farming system, 73.6 % in Cilaku sub district,

65.7% in Mande sub district and 63% in Karangtengah sub district. Whereas in

Bandung District, poultry farming by implementing those 2 ways were done in 53% of

the farms in Arjasari sub district, 38.4% in Rancaekek sub district and 36.6% in

Majalaya sub district. However, the number of farmer that kept their poultry freely in

house backyard (way no. 4) were still considered relatively high, especially in Arjasari

sub district (41.2%), Majalaya sub district (39.0%) and Karangtengah sub district

(32.5%).

In general, the farmers considered sector 4 poultry farming as “side job”, on which the farmer’s dependency as a main income is less than 30% of their total living cost. In the three sub districts surveyed in Cianjur District 80.9% sector 4 farms were categorized as “side job”, whereas in three sub districts surveyed in Bandung District were 89.1% (refer to Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question

Table 5-15).

This side job paradigm in poultry farming was surely related to the low number

of poultry population in their farms. This condition is indicated by the average number

of sector 4 poultry kept per family in sampled village or in the surveyed sub districts of

both districts (refer to Table 5-17).

The number and type of poultry kept by sector 4 farmers at sampled village in

each surveyed sub district can be seen in detail at Table 5-16.

Biosecurity aspects implemented in most of the sector 4 farms were relatively

poor, in the three sub districts in Cianjur District as well as Bandung District (refer to

Table 5-17).


62 | P A G E

Figure 5-40. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Karangtengah of Cianjur District


63 | P A G E

Figure 5-41. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Cilaku of Cianjur District


64 | P A G E

Figure 5-42. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Mande of Cianjur District


65 | P A G E

Figure 5-43. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Arjasari of Bandung District


66 | P A G E

Figure 5-44. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Rancaekek of Bandung District


67 | P A G E

Figure 5-45. Map of Location Distribution of Sector 4 Farms in Majalaya of Bandung District


68 | P A G E

Table 5-14. Sector 4 Poultry Farming System in Cianjur District and Bandung District

Cianjur District Bandung District

Cilaku Sub district Karangtengah Sub

district Mande Sub district

Arjasari

Sub district

Rancaekek

Sub district

Majalaya

Sub district Farming System

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

- In closed cages 19 26.4 14 18.2 16 21.9 8 15.7 5 12.8 5 12.2

- In cages with free-ranging area completed

with fence 34 47.2 36 46.8 32 43.8 19 37.3 10 25.6 10 24.4

- In fenced backyard of farmers’ house 2 2.8 2 2.6 3 4.1 3 5.9 12 30.8 10 24.4

- Freely roams (free-ranging) in the backyard

and other areas outside the house 17 23.6 25 32.5 22 30.1 21 41.2 12 30.0 16 39.0

T O T A L 72 100.0 77 100.0 73 100.0 51 100.0 39 100.0 41 100.0

Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question

Table 5-15. Purpose of Sector 4 Poultry Farming in Cianjur District and Bandung District


Cilaku Sub district Karangtengah Sub

district Mande Sub district

Arjasari

Sub district

Rancaekek

Sub district

Majalaya

Sub district Main Purpose of Farming

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

- Main job 17 15.5 3 4.7 1 1.3 5 12.5 3 9.7 2 5.1

- Side job 84 76.4 58 90.6 71 91.0 34 85.0 23 74.2 34 87.2

- Self consumption 7 6.4 3 4.7 6 7.7 1 2.5 1 3.2 3 7.7

- Hobby 2 1.8 - - - - - - 4 12.9 - -

T O T A L 110 100.0 64 100.0 78 100.0 40 100.0 31 100.0 39 100.0

Note: The data were based on the number of respondent who actually answered to the asked question


69 | P A G E

Table 5-16. Households with poultry and types of poultry kept by Sector 4 Farmer at Sampled Villages

Number of Owner

District Sub District Sampled Village Chicken

Only

Duck

Only

Goose

Only Bird Only

Muscovy

Duck Only

Broiler

Only

Layer

Only

Kampong

Chicken &

Duck Only

Kampong

Chicken &

Muscovy Duck

Only

Other

Combination

Total

Majasentra 23 6 2 7 5 0 0 2 1 8 54

Neglasari 24 1 0 3 2 0 0 1 7 8 46

Majalaya 12 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 4 27

Majalaya

Wangisagara 27 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 3 16 55

Bojongloa 20 1 0 7 4 0 0 0 5 10 47

Tegal Sumedang 25 0 0 4 16 0 0 1 11 4 61

Haur Rugur 20 2 0 3 9 0 0 0 5 11 50

Rancaekek

Jelegong 18 1 1 19 5 0 0 0 5 9 58

Pinggirsari 45 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 6 57

Rancakole 70 2 0 2 3 0 0 1 12 9 99

Arjasari 25 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 9 42

Bandung

Arjasari

Patrolsari 44 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 10 59

Total Bandung 353 14 4 62 49 1 1 9 58 104 655

Sirnagalih 78 10 2 13 5 0 0 2 13 19 142

Pasir Leutik 9 2 0 3 13 0 0 1 10 4 42

Rahong 75 2 0 3 14 0 0 3 12 19 128

Ciharashas 59 0 0 0 25 0 0 2 25 6 117

Cilaku

Sukasari 85 0 1 5 12 0 0 1 8 6 118

Maleber 73 7 12 7 4 0 0 5 1 4 113

Sabandar 55 5 0 12 0 0 4 0 0 18 94

Bojong 64 1 0 11 2 0 1 9 5 18 111

Karangtengah

Sukamanah 71 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 9 9 94

Bobojong 76 3 1 2 11 1 0 8 11 16 129

Cikidang 67 4 1 4 16 0 0 5 9 13 119

Jamali 74 1 0 2 3 0 0 4 10 18 112

Cianjur

Mande

Kademangan 75 5 1 7 19 1 0 3 8 18 137

Total Cianjur 861 41 18 70 125 2 5 45 121 168 1456

Overall total 1214 55 22 132 174 3 6 54 179 272 2111


70 | P A G E

3/ Biosecurity Condition

Observations were done to determine biosecurity level in sector 4 farms in the

three surveyed sub districts in each district (Cilaku, Karangtengah and Mande sub

districts in Cianjur District and Majalaya, Arjasari and Rancaekek sub districts in

Bandung District). The aspects observed were farming system, sanitation (cage,

backyard, and feed and drink container), handling of poultry feces, movement control

in the farm area, handling of sick/dead poultry and quarantine measures done in each

farm.

Observation on those six aspects indicated that the biosecurity level in most of

the sector 4 farms in the six surveyed sub districts were categorized as relatively

“poor”, with the highest percentage in Karangtengah sub district (83.1%) and the

lowest in Arjasari sub district (60.9%). In contrary, farms that were categorized as

“medium” to “good” were relatively high in Arjasari sub district (39.1%) and lowest in

Karangtengah sub district (16.9%)

Biosecurity is the first line of defense to diseases (Cardona 2005). If farmer

implements good biosecurity, it will keep microbes away from the poultry and the

poultry away from microbes (Jeffrey 2006). The relatively poor biosecurity condition in

both study areas may act as a trigger for the entry and spread of infectious agents.

Farm with poor biosecurity condition may promote AI virus infection in poultry (FAO

2005), and may cause the spread of H5N1 virus to other farms (Songserm et al. 2006).

Poultry kept in farms with poor biosecurity level has 5x higher risk of being exposed to

AI virus compared to poultry in farms with good biosecurity condition (Sinarjaya,

2007).

Detail description of biosecurity condition in sector 4 poultry farms in Cianjur

District and Bandung District is shown in Table 5-17.

Table 5-17. Condition of Biosecurity Level in Sector 4 Poultry Farms in Cianjur District and Bandung District

District Sub district Category of Biosecurity

Level

Number of

Respondent %

Good 2 2.9

Medium 12 17.7

Poor 54 79.4 Cilaku

Total 68 100.0

Good 1 1.3

Medium 12 15.6

Poor 64 83.1 Karangtengah

Total 77 100.0

Good 0 0.0

Medium 16 21.9

Poor 57 78.1

Cianjur

Mande

Total 73 100.0

Good 0 0.0

Medium 8 21.0

Poor 30 79.0 Majalaya

Total 38 100.0

Good 8 17.4

Medium 10 21.7

Poor 28 60.9

Bandung

Arjasari

Total 46 100.0


71 | P A G E

District Sub district Category of Biosecurity

Level

Number of

Respondent %

Good 2 5.3

Medium 9 23.7

Poor 27 71.0 Rancaekek

Total 38 100.0

4/ Estimation of Population

Estimation of poultry population in sector 4 farms in the study areas were done

by three approach methods, (1) determining average number of poultry owned by

each farmer (head of family) in sampled village level and sub district level, (2)

determining proportion of farmer (head of family) who owns poultry in each sub

district, and (3) determining the number of farmer (head of family) in each sub district

(secondary data).

The result from surveys done in three sub districts in Cianjur District and

Bandung District revealed that the average numbers of poultry owned by each farmer

were relatively similar, with the highest rate in Mande Sub district (11 poultry/farmer)

and the lowest in Cilaku Sub district (9.2 poultry/farmer). While in sampled village

level, the average number of poultry owned by each farmer was highest in Pasir Leutik

village (Cilaku sub district) which was 15.1 poultry/farmer and the lowest were in

Sukasari village (Cilaku sub district) and Subandar village (Karang Tengah sub district)

which was 7.9 poultry/farmer.

The detailed data of sector 4 poultry ownership per farmer in sampled village

level and sub district level is shown in Table 5-18.

Table 5-18. Average Number of Poultry Owned by Each Farmer in Sampled Villages and Surveyed Sub

Districts

Average number of poultry owned per farmer

Sub district/District Name of Sampled Village Sampled village (number of

poultry)

Sub district level (number of

poultry)

(1) Maleber 10.7

(2) Subandar 7.9

(3) Bojong 12.2

Karangtengah/Cianjur

(4) Sukamanah 9.4

10.2

(1) Bobojong 8.5

(2) Cikidang Bayabang 8.2

(3) Jamali 13.6

Mande/Cianjur

(4) Kademangan 13.7

11

(1) Sirnagalih 8.4

(2) Rahong 9.3

(3) Ciharashas 9.4

(4) Sukasari 7.9

Cilaku/Cianjur

(5) Pasir Leutik 15.1

9.2

(1) Pinggis Sari 8.5

(2) Rancakole 10.9

(3) Arjasari 8.1

Arjasari/Bandung

(4) Patrolsari 10.2

9.8

(1) Bojongloa 12.1

(2) Tegal Sumedang 9.2

(3) Haur Pugur 9.1

Rancaekek/Bandung

(4) Jelegong 11.4

10.6

(1) Maja Setra 8.9

(2) Neglasari 11.6

Majalaya/Bandung

(3) Majalaya 8.8

9.6


72 | P A G E

Average number of poultry owned per farmer

(4) Wangi Sagara 8.9

The highest proportion of farmer (head of family) who owned sector 4 poultry

from the 6 sub districts surveyed was in Arjasari Sub district (0.61) and the lowest was

in Karangtengah Sub district (0.2). In detail, the proportion of farmer who owns sector

4 poultry is shown in Table 5-19.

Table 5-19. Proportion of Farmer Owning Sector 4 Poultry in Cianjur District and Bandung District

Proportion

District Sub District Village No. of

Respondent No. Poultry Owner Sampled

Village

Sampled Sub

District

Sirnagalih 338 142 0.42

Rahong 298 128 0.43

Ciharashas 324 120 0.37

Pasir Leutik (Ciharashas) 114 42 0.37

Sukasari 264 119 0.45

Cilaku

Total 1,338 551

0.41

Maleber 595 115 0.19

Sabandar 448 94 0.21

Bojong 488 108 0.22

Sukamanah 479 92 0.19

Karangtengah

Total 2,010 409

0.20

Bobojong 277 128 0.46

Cikidang 303 120 0.40

Jamali 267 133 0.50

Kademangan 331 135 0.41

Cianjur

Mande

Total 1,178 516

0.44

Arjasari 150 92 0.61 0.61

Rancaekek 150 51 0.34 0.34

Bandung

Majalaya 150 78 0.52 0.52

The estimation of sector 4 poultry population in each sub district can be

determined based on the average number of poultry owned per farmer or per family,

proportion of farmer who owns poultry and the number of family per sub district.

The survey result shows that the highest poultry population of sector 4 farm in

the three surveyed sub districts of Cianjur was found in Cilaku Sub districts with 87,100

birds and the lowest was in Karangtengah Sub district with 68,050 birds. As for the

sampled village, the highest number of poultry population was found in Jamali Village

with 17,775 birds and the lowest was in Sukamanah Village with 3,309 birds.

For the three sub districts in Bandung, the highest sector 4 poultry population

was found in Majalaya sub district; i.e. 183,753 birds. The other two sub districts had

128,759 birds (Arjasari sub district) and 136,298 birds (Rancaekek sub district). In the

sampled village level, two villages in Rancaekek sub district have the highest and the

lowest number of poultry population, Bojong Loa Village (15,259) and Tegal Sumedang

Village (3,166) respectively.

In detail, the data of sector 4 poultry population in Cianjur district and Bandung

district is shown in Table 5-20 and Table 5-21.


73 | P A G E

Table 5-20. Estimation of Sector 4 Poultry Population in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District

Sub district Village

Number of

family/

village

Average

number of

poultry

owned per

family

Proportion of

Family that owns

Poultry

Estimation of

Population

(Number of

Poultry/

Village)

1. Sukamanah*)

1,853 9.4 0.19 3,309

2. Cikarang 2,135 10.2 0.20 4,355

3. Sukamantri 1,317 10.2 0.20 2,687

4. Sukasarana 1,082 10.2 0.20 2,207

5. Sukasari 1,664 10.2 0.20 3,395

6. Bojong*)

4,115 12.2 0.22 11,045

7. Bbk. Caringin 1,698 10.2 0.20 3,464

8. Subandar*)

3,011 7.9 0.21 4,995

9. Sindangsari 2,360 10.2 0.20 4,814

10. Sukataris 2,194 10.2 0.20 4,476

11. Sidanglaka 1,526 10.2 0.20 3,113

12. Langensari 1,587 10.2 0.20 3,237

13. Hegarmanah 3,042 10.2 0.20 6,206

14. Sukajadi 1,386 10.2 0.20 2,827

15. Sukamulya 1,204 10.2 0.20 2,456

16. Maleber*)

2,687 10.7 0.19 5,463

Karangtengah

Total 32,861 68,050

1. Kademangan*)

2,134 13.7 0.41 11,987

2. Bobojong*)

3,829 8.5 0.46 14,971

3. Cikidang Bayabang*)

1,688 8.2 0.40 5,537

4. Mande 946 11 0.44 4,579

5. Mulyasari 1,052 11 0.44 5,092

6. Jamali*)

2,614 13.6 0.50 17,775

7. Ciandan 1,430 11 0.44 6,921

8. Sukamanah 1,035 11 0.44 5,009

9. Leuwikoja 472 11 0.44 2,284

10. Mekarjaya 894 11 0.44 4,327

11. Kutawaringin 883 11 0.44 4,274

12. Murnisari 820 11 0.44 3,969

Mande

Total 17,797 86,725

1. Sukasari*)

2,741 7.9 0.45 9,744

2. Sirnagalih*)

3,694 8.4 0.42 13,032

3. Sukakerta 2,088 9.2 0.41 7,876

4. Cibinonghilir 1,658 9.2 0.41 6,254

5. Rahong*)

1,889 9.3 0.43 7,554

6. Munjul 1,636 9.2 0.41 6,171

7. Rancagoong 1,801 9.2 0.41 6,793

8. Sindangsari 2,067 9.2 0.41 7,797

9. Ciharahas*)

2,115 9.4 0.37 7,356

10. Mulyasari 1,612 9.2 0.41 6,080

11. Pasir Leutik*) 1,511 15.1 0.37 8,442

Cilaku

Total 22,812 87,100

Note : Estimation of Population = Number of family/Village x Average Number of Poultry Owned/family x Proportion of Family

that owns poultry

*= Sampled Village


74 | P A G E

Table 5-21. Estimation of Sector 4 Poultry Population in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Bandung District

Sub district Village

Number of

family/

village

Average

number of

poultry owned

per family

Proportion

of Family

that owns

Poultry

Estimation of

Population

(Number of

Poultry/ Village)

1. Arjasari*) 2,276 8.1 11,246

2. Pinggir Sari*) 2,181 8.5 11,308

3. Lebak Wangi 2,653 9.8 15,860

4. Batu Karut 2,474 9.8 14,790

5. Mangunjaya 1,681 9.8 10,049

6. Warga Luyu 1,894 9.8 11,322

7. Baros 2,108 9.8 12,602

8. Mekar Jaya 1,384 9.8 8,274

9. Patrol Sari*) 1,851 10.2 11,517

10. Rancakole*) 2,110 10.9 14,029

11. Andol Mekar 1,315 9.8 7,861

Arjasari

Total 21,927

0.61

128,857

1. Sukamanah 1,753 10.6 6,318

2. Tegal Sumedang*) 1,012 9.2 3,166

3. Rancaekek Kulon 3,090 10.6 11,136

4. Rancaekek Wetan 9,224 10.6 33,243

5. Bojong Loa*) 4,234 10.6 15,259

6. Jelegong*) 3,534 10.6 12,737

7. Suka Mulya 2,405 10.6 8,668

8. Linggar 2,448 10.6 8,823

9. Cangkuang 2,795 10.6 10,073

10. Haur Pugur*) 2,224 9.1 6,881

11. Nanjung Mekar 2,583 10.6 9,309

12. Bojong Salam 1,579 10.6 5,691

13. Sangiang 1,386 10.6 4,995

Rancaekek

Total 38,267

0.34

136,298

1. Biru 4,266 9.6 21,296

2. Bojong 3,722 9.6 18,580

3. Pada Mulya 3,427 9.6 17,108

4. Pada Ulun 3,850 9.6 19,219

5. Majalaya*) 2,916 8.8 13,344

6. Maja Setra*) 2,320 8.9 10,737

7. Maja Kerta 2,744 9.6 13,698

8. Neglasari*) 2,193 11.6 13,228

9. Sukamaju 5,258 9.6 26,248

10. Sukamukti 3,194 9.6 15,944

11. Wangi Sagara*) 3,101 8.9 14,351

Majalaya

Total 36,991

0.52

183,753

Note: Estimation of Population = Number of family/Village x Average Number of Poultry Owned/family x Proportion of Family that

owns poultry

*= Sampled Village

5/ Population Density

Density of sector 4 poultry population per ha in an area is strongly influenced by

the number of poultry population and the size of the area.

Table 5-22 shows the poultry population density for the three surveyed sub

districts in Cianjur; Karangtengah was 12..0 poultry/ha, Cilaku was 17.3 poultry/ha, and

Mande was 11.3 poultry/ha. As for the sampled village, the highest density was found

in Pasir Leutik village with 57.5 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village

with 5.5 poultry/ha.

In Bandung District, the highest number of poultry population density was in

Majalaya Sub district which was 74 poultry/ha. The sector 4 poultry population

densities in the other two sub districts were relatively similar, 25 poultry/ha in Arjasari

Sub district and 28 poultry/ha in Rancaekek Sub district (see Table 5-23).


75 | P A G E

Table 5-22. Sector 4 Poultry Population Density in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District

Sub district Village Area (Ha)

Estimated Population

(Number of

Poultry/Village)

Population Density

(Number of

Poultry/Ha)

1. Sukamanah*)

603.6 3,309 5.5

2. Cikarang 251.8 4,355 17.3

3. Sukamantri 202.0 2,687 13.3

4. Sukasarana 266.2 2,207 8.3

5. Sukasari 295.8 3,395 11.5

6. Bojong*)

568.2 11,045 19.4

7. Bbk. Caringin 584.5 3,464 5.9

8. Subandar*)

478.4 4,995 10.4

9. Sindangsari 388.3 4,814 12.4

10. Sukataris 299.5 4,476 14.9

11. Sidanglaka 335.9 3,113 9.3

12. Langensari 330.1 3,237 9.8

13. Hegarmanah 370.1 6,206 16.8

14. Sukajadi 301.4 2,827 9.4

15. Sukamulya 159.0 2,456 15.4

16. Maleber*)

235.7 5,463 23.0

Karangtengah

Total 5,670.6 68,050 12.0

1. Kademangan*)

432.5 11,987 27.7

2. Bobojong*)

925.6 14,971 16.2


565.2 5,537 9.8

4. Mande 257.6 4,579 17.8

5. Mulyasari 451.4 5,092 11.3

6. Jamali*)

777.0 17,775 22.9

7. Ciandan 757.2 6,921 9.1

8. Sukamanah 868.9 5,009 5.8

9. Leuwikoja --- 2,284 --- 10. Mekarjaya 1,388.4 4,327 3.1

11. Kutawaringin 724.1 4,274 5.9

12. Murnisari 559.2 3,969 7.1

Mande

Total 7,707.2 86,725 11.3

1. Sukasari*)

947.5 9,744 10.3

2. Sirnagalih*)

539.6 13,032 24.2

3. Sukakerta 737.9 7,876 10.7

4. Cibinonghilir 121.4 6,254 51.5

5. Rahong*)

345.2 7,554 21.9

6. Munjul 294.1 6,171 21.0

7. Rancagoong 335.7 6,793 20.2

8. Sindangsari 681.8 7,797 11.4

9. Ciharahas*)

334.6 7,356 22.0

10. Mulyasari 557.2 6,080 10.9

11. Pasir Leutik*) 146.7 8,442 57.5

Cilaku

Total 5,041.8 87,100 17.3

Note *) = Sampled Village


76 | P A G E

Table 5-23. Sector 4 Poultry Population Density in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Bandung District

Sub district Village Area (hectare)

Estimated

Population

(Number of

Poultry/Village)

Population Density

(Number of

Poultry/ha)

1. Arjasari 745.2 11,246 15

2. Pinggir Sari 1,599.0 11,308 7

3. Lebak Wangi 412.3 15,860 38

4. Batu Karut 217.0 14,790 68

5. Mangunjaya 586.7 10,049 17

6. Warga Luyu 518.7 11,322 22

7. Baros 264.5 12,602 48

8. Mekar Jaya 189.3 8,274 44

9. Patrol Sari 314.9 11,517 37

10. Rancakole 206.6 14,029 68

11. Andol Mekar 162.8 7,861 48

Arjasari

Total 5,217.1 128,857 25

1. Sukamanah 347.8 6,318 18

2. Tegal Sumedang 299.9 3,166 11

3. Rancaekek Kulon 364.3 11,136 31

4. Rancaekek Wetan 456.9 33,243 73

5. Bojong Loa 567.7 15,259 27

6. Jelegong 454.0 12,737 28

7. Suka Mulya 250.9 8,668 35

8. Linggar 664.4 8,823 13

9. Cangkuang 295.7 10,073 34

10. Haur Pugur 511.4 6,881 13

11. Nanjung Mekar 328.9 9,309 28

12. Bojong Salam 154.4 5,691 37

13. Sangiang 250.9 4,995 20

Rancaekek

Total 4,947.2 136,298 28

1. Biru 517.2 21,296 41

2. Bojong 182.1 18,580 102

3. Pada Mulya 162.8 17,108 105

4. Pada Ulun 404.8 19,219 47

5. Majalaya 86.1 13,344 155

6. Maja Setra 213.5 10,737 50

7. Maja Kerta 141.6 13,698 97

8. Neglasari 233.6 13,228 57

9. Sukamaju 293.3 26,248 89

10. Sukamukti 153.2 15,944 104

11. Wangi Sagara 106.4 14,351 135

Majalaya

Total 2,494.6 183,753 74

Note *) = Sampled village

6/ Avian Influenza (AI) Vaccination Status

In general, most of the sector 4 farms in the surveyed sub districts in Cianjur

District and Bandung District had never been introduced to AI vaccination. In other

words, the coverage of AI vaccination program in both surveyed districts did not cover

the sector 4 farms well. Table 5-24 shows that the highest level of AI vaccination

coverage in three surveyed sub districts in Cianjur district only reached 22.9%, which is

in Cilaku sub district. In Bandung district, the highest percentage of AI vaccination

coverage was in Majalaya Sub district which was 11.7%.


77 | P A G E

Table 5-24. Avian Influenza Vaccination Status in Three Surveyed Sub districts in Cianjur District and Bandung

District

AI vaccination status District Sub district

Number of farm

respondent Vaccinated (%) Not vaccinated (%)

- Karangtengah 62 7 (11.3) 55 (88.7)

- Mande 74 16 (21.6) 58 (78.4) Cianjur

- Cilaku 105 24 (22.9) 81 (77.1)

- Arjasari 40 1 (2.5) 39 (97.5)

- Rancaekek 26 1 (3.8) 25 (96.2) Bandung

- Majalaya 34 4 (11.8) 30 (88.2)

In addition, frequency of vaccination in some of the sector 4 farms that had been

vaccinated with AI vaccine is also considered low. Generally, AI vaccination in sector 4

farms in both districts had only been done once. The low level of AI vaccination

coverage and irregularity in vaccination program would cause ineffectiveness in AI

disease control in sector 4 farms in both districts.

7/ Production Input and Output Flow

Species of poultry that can be found kept in sector 4 farms are kampong

chickens, ducks, geese and muscovy ducks. Seed sources for kampong chicken in

surveyed area in Bandung District and Cianjur District are shown in Table 5-25.

Table 5-25. Sources of Kampong Chicken Seed for Sector 4 Farms


Source of Chicken Seed Number of

Farmer %

Number of

Farmer %

- Farmers within the same/local sub district 564 48.9 126 25.8

- Markets within the local sub district 67 5.8 14 2.9

- Self-breeding (natural hatching on the farm) 361 31.3 313 64.1

- Farmers from other sub districts 66 5.7 22 4.5

- Markets in the local district 47 4.1 1 0.2

- Poultry broker (tengkulak) 10 0.9 - -

- Poultry collectors 4 0.3 - -

- Combination of 2 or more sources mentioned above 34 3.0 12 2.5

Total 1,153 100.0 488 100.0

Most of the farmers in the surveyed area in Bandung District obtained the

kampong chicken through hatching own farm eggs (64.1%) and from farmers within

the same sub district (26%). While in general, farmers in Cianjur District obtained the

kampong chicken breeding material from farmers within the same sub district (48.9%)

and by self breeding (31.3%).

As for the source for duck breeding material, most of the farmers in the surveyed

area of Bandung district obtained their duck seeds through self breeding (59.5%) and

from farmers within the same sub district (29.7%). Majority of farmers in Cianjur

District obtained their duck seeds from farmers within the same sub district (39.1%)

and by self breeding (30.8%).

Sources of duck seed in the surveyed area in Bandung and Cianjur District are

described in detail in Table 5-26.


78 | P A G E

Table 5-26. Sources of Duck Seed for Sector 4 Farms


Source of Duck Seed Number or

farmer %

Number of

farmer %


- Markets within the local sub district 8 6.0 1 2.7

- Self breeding 41 30.8 22 59.5


- Markets in the local district 12 9.0 - -


- Combination of 2 or more sources mentioned above 3 2.3 - -

Total 133 100.0 37 100.0

As for the goose seed source (see Table 5-27), the majority of farmers in the

surveyed area in Bandung District obtained their goose seeds through self breeding

(52.6%) and from farmers within the same sub district (42.1%). Whereas farmers in

the Cianjur District obtained their goose seeds from farmers within the same sub

district (28.1%), self breeding (15.6%), and from markets within the local district

(15.6%).

For the sources of bird seed, most farmers in Bandung District obtained their bird

seed through self breeding (40.5%) and from farmers within the same sub district

(20.7%), while farmers in Cianjur District obtained bird seed from farmers within the

same sub district (43.5%) and from markets within the local district (16.8%). Sources

of bird seed supply in the surveyed area in Bandung and Cianjur Districts are shown in

Table 5-28.

Table 5-27. Sources of Goose Seed for sector 4 farms


Source of Goose Seed Number of

farmer %

Number of

farmer %


- Self breeding 10 15.6 10 52.6

- Markets within the local sub district 10 15.6 - -

- Farmers from other sub districts 5 7.8 - -

- Markets in the local district 8 12.5 - -


- Profit sharing system 8 12.5 - -


Total 64 100.0 19 100.0

Table 5-28. Sources of Bird Seed for Sector 4 farms


Sources of Bird Seed Number of

farmer %

Number of

farmer %

- Markets in the local sub district 22 16.8 19 16.4

- Self breeding 12 9.2 47 40.5

- Farmers within the local sub district 57 43.5 24 20.7



- Profit sharing system 6 4.6 6 5.2

- Others 2 1.5 - -

Total 131 100.0 116 100.0

For the supply of muscovy duck seed, most farmers in Bandung District obtained

the seed through self breeding (55.6%) and from farmers within the same sub district

(40.3%), whereas farmers in Cianjur District obtained the seed from farmers within the

same sub district (48.1%) and through self breeding (25%). Sources for muscovy duck


79 | P A G E

seed supply in the surveyed areas in Bandung District and Cianjur District are shown in

Table 5-29.

Table 5-29. Sources of Muscovy Duck Seed for Sector 4 Farms


Sources of Muscovy Duck Seed Number of

farmer %

Number of

farmer %

- Farmers within the local sub district 127 48.1 50 40.3

- Self breeding 66 25.0 69 55.6

- Markets in the local sub district 28 10.6 - -





Total 264 100.0 124 100.0

Supply of poultry seed sources (kampong chickens, ducks, geese, birds and

muscovy ducks) for sector 4 farmers as mentioned above, indicated that the mobility

of poultry sources input in both surveyed districts were carried out within the local sub

district. The marketing of sector 4 farm products in Bandung District and Cianjur

District are shown in Table 5-30.

Table 5-30. Poultry and Egg Marketing in Sector 4


Live Poultry Egg Live Poultry Egg Live Poultry/Egg Marketing

Farmer % Farmer % Farmer % Farmer %

- Through collectors 813 62.4 46 22.8 417 75.5 3 25.0

- To local sub district market 29 3.2 5 2.5 17 3.1 1 8.3

- To local district market 16 1.2 2 1.0 2 0.4 - -

- For self consumption 408 31.0 142 70.3 97 17.6 8 66.7

- Combination of 2 or more marketing

type above 42 3.2 7 3.4 19 3.4 - -

Total 1,318 100.0 202 100.0 552 100.0 12 100.0

In the surveyed areas in Bandung District, most of the live poultry in sector 4

farms were sold as products through collectors (75.5%) and others were used for self

consumption purpose (17.6%). In Cianjur District, most of the farmers sold their live

poultry through collectors (62.4%) and others used them for self consumption purpose

(31.0%). As for sector 4 farm egg products, most farmers in Bandung District (66.7%)

and Cianjur District (70.3%) consumed them for self sustenance.

G. Total Poultry Population Number and Density

The total poultry population number and density for the whole sector (1, 2, 3,

and 4) for each surveyed sub district can be seen in Table 5-31 and Table 5-32.

In Cianjur district, the highest poultry population number for sub district level

was in Mande (921,102 birds) and the lowest was in Karangtengah (287,850 birds).

The highest density for sub district level was in Cilaku (130.2 poultry/ha) and the

lowest was in Karangtengah (50.8 poultry/ha). For sampled village level, the highest

population number was in Jamali village with 464,152 birds and the lowest was in

Sukamanah village with 3,309 birds. And the highest population density was found in

Jamali village with 597.3 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village (5.5

poultry/ha).


80 | P A G E

Table 5-31. Total Poultry Population Number and Density in Cianjur District

Population per Sector

Sub District Village Area (ha) Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3

Total Sector

1,2,3

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Population

of Sector 4

Sector 4

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Total

Population

of Sector

1,2,3,4

Population

Density of

Sector 1,2,3,4

1. Sukamanah*)

603.6 3,309 5.5 3,309 5.5

2. Cikarang 251.8 4,355 17.3 4,355 17.3

3. Sukamantri 202.0 2,687 13.3 2,687 13.3

4. Sukasarana 266.2 2,207 8.3 2,207 8.3

5. Sukasari 295.8 3,395 11.5 3,395 11.5

6. Bojong*)

568.2 9,300 9,300 16.4 11,045 19.4 20,345 35.8

7. Bbk. Caringin 584.5 20,000 20,000 34.2 3,464 5.9 23,464 40.1

8. Subandar*)

478.4 4,995 10.4 4,995 10.4

9. Sindangsari 388.3 4,814 12.4 4,814 12.4

10. Sukataris 299.5 6,000 6,000 20.0 4,476 14.9 10,476 35.0

11. Sidanglaka 335.9 3,113 9.3 3,113 9.3

12. Langensari 330.1 5,500 5,500 16.7 3,237 9.8 8,737 26.5

13. Hegarmanah 370.1 42,000 137,000 179,000 483.6 6,206 16.8 185,206 500.4

14. Sukajadi 301.4 2,827 9.4 2,827 9.4

15. Sukamulya 159.0 2,456 15.5 2,456 15.5

16. Maleber*)

235.7 5,463 23.2 5,463 23.2

Karangtengah

Total 5670.6 0 42,000 177,800 219,800 38.8 68,050 12.0 287,850 50.8

1. Kademangan*)

432.5 11,987 27.7 11,987 27.7

2. Bobojong*)

925.6 178,000 178,000 192.3 14,971 16.2 192,971 208.5


565.2 5,537 9.8 5,537 9.8

4. Mande 257.6 120,000 120,000 465.8 4,579 17.8 124,579 483.6

5. Mulyasari 451.4 5,092 11.3 5,092 11.3

6. Jamali*)

777.0 226,377 200,000 20,000 446,377 574.5 17,775 22.9 464,152 597.3

7. Ciandam 757.2 40,000 40,000 52.8 6,921 9.1 46,921 62.0

8. Sukamanah 868.9 5,009 5.8 5,009 5.8

9. Leuwikoja --- 2,284 2,284

10. Mekarjaya 1,388.4 50,000 50,000 36.0 4,327 3.1 54,327 39.1

11. Kutawaringin 724.1 4,274 5.9 4,274 5.9

12. Murnisari 559.2 3,969 7.1 3,969 7.1

Mande

Total 7,707.2 226,377 200,000 408,000 834,377 108.3 86,725 11.3 921,102 119.5

1. Sukasari*)

947.5 9,744 10.3 9,744 10.3

2. Sirnagalih*)

539.6 37,500 37,500 69.5 13,032 24.2 50,532 93.6

3. Sukakerta 737.9 25,000 202,800 227,800 308.7 7,876 10.7 235,676 319.4

Cilaku

4. Cibinonghilir 121.4 12,500 12,500 103.0 6,254 51.5 18,754 154.5


81 | P A G E



Total Sector

1,2,3

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Population

of Sector 4

Sector 4

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Total

Population

of Sector

1,2,3,4

Population

Density of

Sector 1,2,3,4

5. Rahong*)

345.2 87,000 87,000 252.0 7,554 21.9 94,554 273.9

6. Munjul 294.1 18,000 18,000 61.2 6,171 21.0 24,171 82.2

7. Rancagoong 335.7 10,000 10,000 29.8 6,793 20.2 16,793 50.0

8. Sindangsari 681.8 103,000 103,000 151.1 7,797 11.4 110,797 162.5

9. Ciharahas*)

334.6 60,000 13,816 73,816 220.6 7,356 22.0 81,172 242.6

10. Mulyasari 557.2 6,080 10.9 6,080 10.9

11. Pasir Leutik 146.7 8,442 57.6 8,442 57.6

Total 5,041.8 0 85,000 484,616 569,616 113.0 87,100 17.3 656,716 130.3

Table 5-32. Total Poultry Population Number and Density in Bandung District



Total Sector

1,2,3

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Population

of Sector 4

Sector 4

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Total

Population

of Sector

1,2,3,4

Population

Density of

Sector 1,2,3,4

1. Arjasari*)

745.2 60,000 328,500 388,500 521.3 11,232 15.1 399,732 536.4

2. Pinggir Sari*)

1,599.0 95,000 95,000 59.4 11,362 7.1 106,362 66.5

3. Lebak Wangi 412.3 32,200 32,200 78.1 15,827 38.4 48,027 116.5

4. Batu Karut 217.0 14,300 14,300 65.9 14,759 68.0 29,059 133.9

5. Mangunjaya 586.7 10,029 17.1 10,029 17.1

6. Warga Luyu 518.7 17,000 17,000 32.8 11,299 21.8 28,299 54.6

7. Baros 264.5 73,000 73,000 276.0 12,576 47.5 85,576 323.5

8. Mekar Jaya 189.3 9,000 9,000 47.5 8,257 43.6 17,257 91.1

9. Patrol Sari*)

314.9 60,000 20,000 80,000 254.1 11,517 36.6 91,517 290.6

10. Rancakole*)

206.6 14,055 68.0 14,055 68.0

11. Andol Mekar 162.8 7,845 48.2 7,845 48.2

Arjasari

Total 5217.1 0 120,000 589,000 709,000 135.9 128,758 24.7 837,758 160.6

1. Sukamanah 347.8 2,835 2,835 8.2 6,306 18.1 9,141 26.3

2. Tegal Sumedang*)

299.9 700 700 2.3 3,179 10.6 3,879 12.9

3. Rancaekek Kulon 364.3 11,115 30.5 11,115 30.5

4. Rancaekek Wetan 456.9 920 920 2.0 33,181 72.6 34,101 74.6

5. Bojong Loa*)

567.7 16,500 16,500 29.1 17,462 30.8 33,962 59.8

6. Jelegong*)

454.0 6,190 6,190 13.6 13,734 30.3 19,924 43.9

7. Suka Mulya 250.9 1,300 1,300 5.2 8,651 34.5 9,951 39.7

8. Linggar 664.4 400 400 0.6 8,806 13.3 9,206 13.9

9. Cangkuang 295.7 9,970 9,970 33.7 10,054 34.0 20,024 67.7

Rancaekek

10. Haur Pugur*)

511.4 30,445 30,445 59.5 6,896 13.5 37,341 73.0


82 | P A G E



Total Sector

1,2,3

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Population

of Sector 4

Sector 4

Population

Density

(poultry/ha)

Total

Population

of Sector

1,2,3,4

Population

Density of

Sector 1,2,3,4

11. Nanjung Mekar 328.9 1,149 1,149 3.5 9,292 28.3 10,441 31.7

12. Bojong Salam 154.4 5,800 5,800 37.6 5,680 36.8 11,480 74.3

13. Sangiang 250.9 2,110 2,110 8.4 4,986 19.9 7,096 28.3

Total 4,947.2 0 0 78,319 78,319 15.8 139,342 28.2 217,661 44.0

1. Biru 517.2 21,252 41.1 21,252 41.1

2. Bojong 182.1 18,542 101.8 18,542 101.8

3. Pada Mulya 162.8 11,500 11,500 70.6 17,072 104.9 28,572 175.5

4. Pada Ulun 404.8 19,179 47.4 19,179 47.4

5. Majalaya*)

86.1 1,500 1,500 17.4 13,359 155.2 14,859 172.7

6. Maja Setra*)

213.5 10,749 50.4 10,749 50.4

7. Maja Kerta 141.6 12,000 12,000 84.7 13,670 96.5 25,670 181.2

8. Neglasari*)

233.6 90 90 0.4 13,194 56.5 13,284 56.9

9. Sukamaju 293.3 26,193 89.3 26,193 89.3

10. Sukamukti 153.2 15,911 103.8 15,911 103.8

11. Wangi Sagara*)

106.4 19,132 19,132 179.8 14,400 135.3 33,532 315.2

Majalaya

Total 2,494.6 0 0 44,222 44,222 17.7 183,520 73.6 227,742 91.3


83 | P A G E

In Bandung district, the highest population number for sub district level was

found in Arjasari sub district with 837,758 birds and the lowest was in Rancaekek sub

district with 217,661 birds. The highest poultry population density was found in

Arjasari sub district with 160.6 poultry/ha and the lowest density was in Rancaekek

with 44.0 poultry/ha. For sampled village level, the highest poultry population number

was found in Arjasari village with 399,732 birds and the lowest was in Tegal Sumedang

village with 3,879 birds. The highest poultry population density for sampled village

level was found in Arjasari village with 536.4 poultry/ha and the lowest was in Tegal

Sumedang village with 12.9 poultry/ha.

The total poultry population density in villages of surveyed sub districts in Cianjur

and Bandung can be seen in Figure 5-46 to Figure 5-51.

H. Poultry Sector Infrastructure

1/ Cianjur District

Cianjur district has a good potential for animal farming. The cattle population

data in 2006 indicated that the number of cow was 1,905, cattle was 23,320, buffalo

was 14,107, sheep was 264,530, goat was 87,690 and horse was 1,397. As for the

population of birds on the same year included layer 1,108,537 chicken, broiler

4,977,315 chicken, kampong chicken 2,941,234 chicken, and duck 367,487 birds.

Especially for current poultry sector; the numbers of active farms in Cianjur

district were six breeding farms, 96 broiler farms (of sector 2 and sector 3), and 28

layer farms (of sector 2 and sector 3). The patterns of poultry farming venture in

sector 2 and sector 3 in this area were the pattern of self-supporting farming and core-

plasma farming system. In order to support such poultry business activities; in Cianjur

there were seven 7 poultry shops that took a role in supplying production means.

The data of breeding farm and poultry shops in Cianjur area can be seen in Table

5-33 and Table 5-34.

Table 5-33. The List of Breeding Farm in Cianjur District - 2006

No. Company Type Strain Address

1. PT. Hybro Indonesia (GPS) Broiler

Layer

Hybro

Hysex

Cikalong Kulon sub

district

2. PT. Manggis (PS) Broiler

Layer

Hybro

Hysex

Mande sub district

3. PT. Cipendawa (GPS and PS) Broiler

Layer

Layer

Hubbard

Golden Commet

Isa Brown

Pacet sub district

4. PT. Nuyan Farm (PS) Broiler Hubbard Cianjur sub district

5. PT. Penta Farm (PS) Broiler Hubbard Sukaresmi sub district

6. PT. Surya Tegal sari (PS) Broiler Cobb Pacet sub district

Table 5-34. The List of Poultry Shop in Cianjur District - 2006

No. Poultry Shop (PS) Address

1. Cahaya PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 31, Cianjur

2. Subur Tani PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 127-128, Cianjur

3. Irwan PS Jl. Pasar Baru No. 182, Cianjur

4. Berkat PS Jl. Otista No. 3, Cianjur

5. Dannas Farm PS Ds. Warung Dadas, Kec. Mande, Cianjur

6. Cikalong PS Cikalong, Cianjur


84 | P A G E

Figure 5-46. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Karangtengah Sub District in Cianjur District


85 | P A G E

Figure 5-47. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Mande Sub District in Cianjur District


86 | P A G E

Figure 5-48. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Cilaku Sub District in Cianjur District


87 | P A G E

Figure 5-49. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Arjasari Sub District in Bandung District


88 | P A G E

Figure 5-50. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Rancaekek Sub District in Bandung District


89 | P A G E

Figure 5-51. Total Poultry Population Density Map for Majalaya Sub District in Bandung District


90 | P A G E

The government body that rendered the service in animal farming sector in

Cianjur district was Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan which was address at Jl. Arif

Rahman Hakim No. 26 Kabupaten Cianjur. The facilities owned by this body were one

animal market for sheep and goat, one type-C slaughterhouse (RPH) which was still

under-equipped, and three animal health posts (Poskeswan). Out of the three posts,

only one functioned fully as service posts giving out animal health services; i.e. the one

located in Cugenang sub district. The other two posts; located in KUD Cipanas and

Agrabinta; functioned more as integrated animal service center which activities

included artificial insemination, reproduction check (PKB), Assistance Technique

Reproduction (ATR) and animal health service. The diagnostic equipment owned by

Dinas of Cianjur were testing kit for avian influenza (AI) for rapid test, pH meter,

thermometer, minor surgery equipment, microscope and formalin test for food

originated from animal and fish.

The number of human resource; with civil servant status (PNS); in this body was

141 persons. But the number of human resource that directly related to the animal

farming; in aspects of policy and operational; was only 27 persons with level of

education/expertise included veterinarian (3 persons), animal farming graduates (4

persons), veterinary medicine graduates (1 person), paramedic (9 persons), economy

graduates (1 person), high-school graduates (9 persons).

Having seen the area to cover and the poultry potency in Cianjur district; it is

certainly obvious that the current number of human resource would not suffice all the

medical expertise, paramedic expertise, and general animal farming needs.

The disease control program for avian influenza (AI) had been done in the area

since 2004; which included:

1. Socialization of AI disease; annual program.

2. Vaccination for AI on poultry of sector 4 since the end of 2004 using H5N1 vaccine,

and in the early 2006 using H5N2 vaccine.

3. Spraying disinfectant around sector 4 farms which became annual program.

The surveillance program for AI was initiated in 2005 which covered the activities

of post-vaccination antibody titer check, monitoring, and sample drawing to detect AI.

These programs were very much helped by the activity of participatory disease

surveillance/PDS team and participatory disease response/PDR team since 2006.

Besides by the government, the AI disease control was also done by private

sector; i.e. Community-based Avian Influenza Control Project (CBAIC) addressed at

Gedung BRI II Suite 2807, Jl. Jendral Sudirman no. 44-46 Jakarta. This institution was

built on the collaboration among the National Committee on AI Control (Komite

Nasional Pengendalian Flu Burung) in order to raise awareness against AI pandemic

(Komnas FBPI), USAID, and Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur district. The

activity was to help local government to socialize the mitigation and prevention of AI

disease, formed up team of volunteers to control AI and performed disinfectant at sub

district level.

This program had trained 30 volunteers across sub districts in Cianjur district

who actively participated in the socialization of AI disease, reported AI cases, and


91 | P A G E

performed disinfection in their own territory. It seemed effective to help overcoming

the shortage on medical and paramedic human resource in the area.

Furthermore, Cianjur district also had poultry associations involved in the AI

control. One of the associations was Tri Mitra group that focused in broiler farming

with 20 members. The activity of this group against AI included improving the

biosecurity on their pens.

Other poultry group in the area of Cianjur district can be seen in Table 5-35.

Table 5-35. Poultry Groups in Cianjur District

No. Group Name Address

1 Kelompok Ternak Puyuh Bina Satwa Kademangan Mande sub district

2 Kelompok Ayam Buras Pasir Lama Cibinonghilir Cilaku sub district

3 Kelompok Ayam Buras Laksana Mulya Sirnagalih Cilaku sub district

4 Kelompok Itik Mekartani I Rahong Cilaku sub district

5 Kelompok Itik Mekartani I Rahong Cilaku sub district

6 Kelompok Itik Mandiri Sindangjaya Karangtengah sub district

7 Kelompok Itik Papit Babakan Caringin Karangtengah sub district

The map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur district location and

poultry shop can be seen in Figure 5-52.

2/ Bandung District

Bandung district is one of animal farming centers in West Java province, both for

large ruminant as well as poultry. Data of large ruminant in 2006 showed that the

population of cow was 53,202, cattle was 8,582, buffalo was 6,742, horse was 4,924,

goat was 60,145 and sheep was 421,142. As for the poultry population data in the

same year showed that broiler amounted to 4,574,250 birds, layer amounted to

572,329 birds, kampong chicken was 4,177,909 birds, and duck was 576,967 birds.

In order to support the poultry business in this area; there were four poultry

shops that took the role in supplying the poultry production means; i.e. Haji Ade in

Ranca Panjang village of Majalaya sub district, Cikaro Poultry Shop in Mojokerta of

Majalaya sub district, Sukamanah Poultry Shop in Banjaran sub district, and PD. Rahayu

located in Rancaekek sub district.

The government body that rendered the service in animal farming sector in

Bandung district was Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan which was address at Komplek

Pemda Kabupaten Bandung Jl. Raya Soreang Km. 17 Soreang Sub district Soreang. The

main task of this body; according to the regional law no. 9 of year 2002 is to formulize

the technical policy and to implement technical operational activity in sector of animal

farming and fishery that covered production, resource management, business

promotion, development, dissemination and implementation of Dinas administration.

To answer the responsibility of performing the development in animal farming and

fishery on 45 sub districts of Bandung then Dinas Peternakan and Perikanan developed

its organization structure which included Head of Dinas, administration section, sub

Dinas for production, sub Dinas for resource management, sub Dinas for business

promotion, sub Dinas for development and dissemination, and a regional technical unit

implementer (UPTD) covering animal slaughterhouse, fish seedling, and cattle

breeding.


92 | P A G E

Figure 5-52. Map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Cianjur District Location and Existing Poultry Shop


93 | P A G E

The facilities this body owned were slaughterhouse (RPH) and poskeswan which

were located in Kampung Pasir Jambu of Ciwidey sub district. Unfortunately the

condition of this poskeswan was already not functional as expected and it would be

moved to Katapang sub district. The available diagnostic equipment included testing

kit of avian influenza (AI) for rapid test, microscope, milk quality tester, formalin test

for food originated from animal and fish, personal protection equipment (mask, gloves,

workwear, goggles, hard head, and boots), disinfectant spraying tool, and automatic

syringe (socorex).

The number of human resource with civil servant status was 133 persons. But

the number of human resource that directly related to the animal farming; in aspects

of policy and operational; was only 52 persons.

The AI control program had been implemented in phase since 2004; this covered

(1) socialization on AI disease to all farmers and broad community regularly since 2004,

and (2) vaccination, disinfection by spraying, depopulation, and improvement in

biosecurity. The vaccination and disinfection program were implemented especially on

sector 4 farms; as for sector 1 and other commercial farms that programs were for the

owner of respected farms to take control.

The AI disease surveillance was also initiated in 2004; i.e. through activities of

monitoring and sample drawing for regular testing. This surveillance program was very

much helped by the activity of participatory disease surveillance/PDS team and

participatory disease response/PDR team since 2006.

The involvement of private sector in the control and surveillance of AI was also

found in Bandung district. In Cipatat sub district, the breeding farm company

performed the AI control through regular vaccination to the flock in sector 4 farms in

the surrounding area of the company. Also in BBH Ciparay, PT. Medion gave in AI

vaccination aid for as many as 10,000 dosages through province Dinas Peternakan.

This company also performed socialization to all farmers and broad community and

held special short course to team up volunteers as vaccinator for sector 4 farms.

Besides the above facts, there were poultry associations found in this area that

had taken active participation in AI disease control such as poultry farmer group and

PPUI of Bandung district. This group actively involved in socialization and extension

activities on AI disease to local community. This involvement of private sector and

community in the program of AI control surely helped out Dinas to overcome the

shortage in human resource for medic and paramedic personnel.

The map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Bandung district location and

existing poultry shops can be seen in Figure 5-53.


94 | P A G E

Figure 5-53. Map of Dinas Perikanan and Peternakan of Bandung District Location and Existing Poultry Shop


95 | P A G E

6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

A. Conclusion

In short, there are some points to take into account as the result of this poultry

sector survey activity; they are:

1. In general, the locations of sector 1, 2, and 3 farms in the three sub districts

surveyed in Cianjur and Bandung districts were quite strategic and adequately

supported by road infrastructure. In average for most of the sub-districts (except for

farms in Karangtengah sub district of Cianjur district) the estimated distance among

poultry farms was less than the officially required 1 kilometer.

2. The poultry population numbers of sector 1, 2, 3, and 4 farms in the three surveyed

sub districts of Cianjur district were 1,865,668 poultry, with the poultry population

density across sub districts varied from 50.8 poultry/ha to 130.3 poultry/ha. This

numbers were higher than the ones in Bandung district; i.e. the population was

1,283,161 poultry and the density varied from 44.0 poultry/ha to 160.0 poultry/ha.

For the sampled village level in Cianjur, the highest poultry population number was

found in Jamali village with 464,152 birds and the population density of 597.3

poultry/ha and the lowest was in Sukamanah village with 3,309 birds and the

population density of 5.5 poultry/ha. As for Bandung, the highest poultry population

was found in Arjasari village with 399,732 birds and the population density of 536.4

poultry/ha, and the lowest was in Tegal Sumedang village with 3,879 birds and the

population density of 12.9 poultry/ha.

3. In general, the respondents interviewed were quite cooperative; except for some

farmers who refused to be interviewed on the condition that their farms were

inoperative.

4. The poultry composition in sector 1 and 3 farms in the three surveyed sub districts

of Cianjur district was dominated by broiler; while for sector 2 farms, it was by layer

type. On the other hand; in Bandung, the poultry composition between broiler and

layer on sector 3 in the three surveyed sub districts was relatively balanced.

5. For the last three years the average of sector 3 farms suffering from IBD was

relatively higher than the other two diseases (AI and ND), both in Cianjur district as


96 | P A G E

well as in Bandung district. IBD was suffered by the whole sub districts surveyed in

both districts with various distribution levels.

6. For sector 2 farm in Cianjur, the AI vaccination coverage (75%) was relatively higher

than of IBD (50%); although it was still lower than of ND (100%). While in Bandung,

the vacination coverage was the same for all diseases (100%). As for sector 3 farm,

the AI vaccination coverage (32.6% in Cianjur and 40.2% in Bandung) was far lower

than of ND (95.3% in Cianjur and 72.3% in Bandung) and IBD (88.4% in Cianjur and

70.5% in Bandung).

7. The production input on poultry sector 1, 2 and 3 farms in the surveyed areas was

generally obtained from relatively the same location; primarily from West Java

province, Banten, and DKI Jakarta.

8. The product marketing coverage of poultry sector 1 farms was far broader than the

other sectors. The sector 1 farms poultry product was marketed to other islands in

Indonesia while the sector 2 and sector 3 poultry product covered only to West Java

and DKI Jakarta.

9. The slaughterhouse ventures, live poultry traders in wet markets and poultry

collectors obtained the poultry product from local district and from other nearby

districts; while the consumers were from local sub districts.

10. Most of the sector 4 farm business in the surveyed areas was considered as side job

for the household resulting in the relatively low biosecurity level, low AI vaccination

coverage, and irregular AI vaccination activity.

11. Most of poultry input/seedlings around sector 4 farms in the surveyed areas were

from local sub districts. While the live poultry marketing products were mostly sold

to poultry collectors.

12. In general, the poultry population and density on sector 4 farms at each surveyed

sub district in Bandung was relatively higher than at each sub district in Cianjur

district.

13. The availability of facility and human resource in both districts were generally still

inadequate to cover their vast working area and to manage livestock potencies on

both districts.

B. Recommendations

1. An advanced and further integrated study is necessary in order to support the effort

of the improvement of biosecurity quality around sector 4 farms in both surveyed

areas. This study can be implemented in the following steps:

• First step is to assess the initial/actual condition of biosecurity around sector 4

farm in a more comprehensive way and broader area coverage in both districts

(baseline survey).


97 | P A G E

• Second step is to give treatment to target with an extension program covering

the improvement in knowledge, skill, and understanding (awareness) around

sector 4 farmers in the implementation of proper biosecurity practices.

• Third step is to re-assess the biosecurity condition around sector 4 farm (post

treatment survey).

2. In order to implement a similar survey in other areas, we would suggest to secure

and confirm and reconfirm the baseline data from the local Dinas Peternakan to

ensure the valid data for further process. Furthermore, an intensive socialization on

the objective and benefit of the survey to target respondents is also crucial to

ensure their participation in the survey.


98 | P A G E

7 APPENDICES 1. Questionnaire for Grand Parent Stock

2. Questionnaire for Parent Stock

3. Questionnaire for Sector 2 and Sector 3 Farm

4. Questionnaire for Poultry Collector/Trader

5. Questionnaire for Slaughterhouse

6. Questionnaire for Wet Market

7. Questionnaire for Poultry Sector Infrastructure

8. Questionnaire for Sector 4 Farm


99 | P A G E

A. Questionnaire for Grand Parent Stock

QUESTIONNAIRE FORQUESTIONNAIRE FORQUESTIONNAIRE FORQUESTIONNAIRE FOR

GRAND PARENT STOCKGRAND PARENT STOCKGRAND PARENT STOCKGRAND PARENT STOCK

*) choose one

District : Bandung/Cianjur *)

Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………

Date of interview : …………………………………………………………


100 | P A G E

1. Owner : .....................................................................................................

2. Company Name: .....................................................................................................

3. Address of the farm:

.....................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

4. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

5. Number of poultry employee :

Owner/family ..............................................................person

Employee ..............................................................person

6. Number of poultry :

Layer .............................................................chicken

Broiler .............................................................chicken

7. Please state the others poultry in the farm (if any) :

8. Species 9. Type 10. Number

11. Distance between poultry commercial farms : ................... meter


101 | P A G E

12. Disease History The Last 3 Years

We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three

years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST

OCCURRENCE MORBIDITY MORTALITY

POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED

DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING CONTROL BY

DINAS

What diseases

did the poultry

suffer from

within the last

three years?

How many the last

3 years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease

occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

How many

chicken were

infected (by

disease)?

How many

chicken were

dead (by

disease)?

What was the

population

when the

disease struck?

Who confirmed

the disease?

What kind

of handling

did the

company

apply?

Action taken

by Dinas

Peternakan

?

1 Avian Influenza

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


102 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

2 Newcastle

Disease

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


103 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

3 Gumboro

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....

13. Applied Vaccination Program


104 | P A G E

We would like to know about your vaccination program:

14. Vaccination program for chicken

Vaccination Vaccination Schedule (regular/irregular)

No Disease Does company apply

vaccination?

Is the vaccination

program regular?

Vaccination

Schedule

Vaccination

Type

Vaccination

Company

1 Avian Influenza Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

2 ND Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

3 Gumboro Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

15. Vaccination program for DOC

No Vaccine Type Vaccination Schedule

1

2

3

4


105 | P A G E

16. Production Input Procurement

We would like to know about production input procurement at your company.

Volume Strain Source Notes

No Type of Production Input What is the input volume

of each cycle (please

explain)?

What strain (type of

production input) does

your company use?

Where does your

company get such input

(type of production

input)?

Please state any

related important

information, if any.

DOC 1

Broiler

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

Layer

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

2 Pullet �

Broiler

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

Layer

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................


106 | P A G E


3 Feed

.............. Ton x � Factory � Distributor � Poultry shop � Cooperative

� Core Farmer

� Other, ...............

4 Vaccine

.............. dosage/............

......................................

......................................

......................................

� Medicine company

� Distributor � Poultry shop � Dinas Peternakan � Other, ...............

5 Vitamins and other

medicines

.............. dosage/............

x




107 | P A G E

17. Product Marketing (you may want to contact company’s marketing manager)

We would like to know your company’s marketing information.

Volume Marketing Area Consumer Remarks

No Type of Production

Input

What is the product

volume of each

marketing cycle

(please explain)?

Where does your company market the

products? (Please state the company

address)

Who are the consumers? Please state

any related

important

information, if

any.

DOC

Broiler

.............. chicken

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

� PS Farm, The number

of PS ..................

� Other, ............... The

number

.................................

1

Layer

.............. chicken

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

� PS Farm, The number

of PS ..................

� Other, ............... The

number

.................................


108 | P A G E


...............................................................

Excess Male

Layer/Broiler

.............. chicken

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

� Direct to comercial

farm

� Agent/Poultry shop � Farmer Group

� Others, ...............

2 Rejected eggs

.............. egg

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market

� Restaurant/catering

� Directly to end-user

� Other,

.....................................

2 Rejected chicken

..............

chicken/...............

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................


109 | P A G E

B. Questionnaire for Parent Stock


PARENT STOCK PARENT STOCK PARENT STOCK PARENT STOCK

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



110 | P A G E

1. Owner : .....................................................................................................

2. Company Name: .....................................................................................................


.....................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

4. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

5. Number of poultry employee:

Owner/family ..............................................................person

Employee ..............................................................person

6. Number of poultry:

Layer .............................................................chicken

Broiler .............................................................chicken

7. Please state the others poultry in the farm (if any) :

Species Type Number



111 | P A G E


We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three

years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

What diseases

did the poultry

suffer from

within the last

three years?

How many the last

3 years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease

occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

How many

chicken were

infected (by

disease)?

How many

chicken were

dead (by

disease)?

What was the

population

when the

disease struck?

Who confirmed

the disease?

What kind

of handling

did the

company

apply?

Action taken

by Dinas

Peternakan

?

1 Avian Influenza

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


112 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

2 Newcastle

Disease

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


113 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

3 Gumboro

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....




114 | P A G E

(i) Vaccination program for chicken



vaccination?

Is the vaccination

program regular?

Vaccination

Schedule

Vaccination

Type

Vaccination

Company


1 2

Yes No

1 2

2 ND Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

3 Gumboro Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

(ii) Vaccination program for DOC

No Vaccine Type Vaccination Schedule

1

2

3

4


115 | P A G E






explain)?



your company use?

Where does your


(type of production

input)?

Please state any

related important


DOC 1

Broiler

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

Layer

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

2 Pullet �

Broiler

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

Layer

.............. chicken

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................


116 | P A G E


3 Feed

.............. Ton x � Factory � Distributor � Poultry shop � Cooperative

� Core Farmer

� Other, ...............

4 Vaccine

.............. dosage/............

......................................

......................................

......................................




medicines

.............. dosage/............

x




117 | P A G E





Input

What is the product

volume of each

marketing cycle

(please explain)?

Where does your company market the

products? (Please state the company

address)


any related

important

information, if

any.

DOC

Broiler

.............. chicken

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

...............................................................

..............................................................

..............................................................

� Direct to commercial

farm, the number

….........

� Agent/Poultry shop, the

number........................

..

� Farmer Group, the

number

..........................

� Other, ............... The

number

.................................

1

Layer

.............. chicken

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................


farm, the number

….........


number........................

..


number

..........................


118 | P A G E


...............................................................

...............................................................

� Other, ............... The

number

.................................

Male Layer

.............. chicken

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................


farm, the number

….........


number........................

..


number

..........................

� Other, ............... The

number

.................................

2 Rejected eggs

.............. egg

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................

2 Rejected chicken

..............

chicken/...............

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................


119 | P A G E

C. Questionnaire for Sector 2 and Sector 3 Farm


SESESESECCCCTOR 2 TOR 2 TOR 2 TOR 2 AND AND AND AND 3333

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



120 | P A G E

1. Sector : 2 / 3 /*

2. Owner : ..................................................................................................

3. Company Name: .....................................................................................................

4. Venture Type : Self-support/Partnership/Plasma

5. Name of the partnership : ……………………………………………………………………………….

of plasma the farm belongs to

………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………


.....................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

7. GPS Details: .....................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

8. Number of poultry*:

Layer ............................................................ chicken

Broiler ............................................................ chicken

9. Please state species, type and number of poultry

Species Type Number



121 | P A G E


We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last three years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

What diseases

did the poultry

suffer from

within the last

three years?

How many the last

3 years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease

occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

How many

chicken were

infected (by

disease)?

How many

chicken were

dead (by

disease)?

What was the

population

when the

disease struck?

Who confirmed

the disease?

What kind

of handling

did the

company

apply?

Action taken

by Dinas

Peternakan

?

1 Avian Influenza

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


122 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

2 Newcastle

Disease

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....


123 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF

3 LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST


POPULATION

WHEN

OCCURRED


DINAS

3 Gumboro

month year

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

....................

chicken

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

.....................

....

.....................

....

.....................

....




124 | P A G E



vaccination?

Is the vaccination

program regular?

Vaccination

Schedule

Vaccination

Type

Vaccination

Company


1 2

Yes No

1 2

2 ND Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

3 Gumboro Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2

4 Cholera Yes None

1 2

Yes No

1 2


125 | P A G E






explain)?



your company use?

Where does your


(type of production

input)?

Please state any

related important


DOC 1

Broiler/Layer*

*) please choose

.............. chicken/.............

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

2 Pullet (for layer farm only)

.............. chicken/.............

� Cobb

� ROSS

� Isa Brown

� Lohmann

� Other, ...............

......................................

......................................

......................................

3 Feed

.............. kg/............... x � Factory � Distributor � Poultry shop � Cooperative

� Core Farmer

� Other, ...............

4 Vaccine

.............. dosage/............

......................................

......................................

......................................




medicines

.............. dosage/............

x � Medicine company




126 | P A G E




Input

What is the product

volume of each

marketing cycle (please

explain)?

Where does your company

market the products?

(Please state the company

address)


any related

important

information, if

any.

1 Egg

.............. kg/...................

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................

2 Spent hen

..............

chicken/...............

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................

3 Broiler

..............

chicken/...............

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................

4 Rooster layer

..............

chicken/...............

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

� Wet Market



� Other,

.....................................


127 | P A G E

D. Questionnaire for Poultry Collector/Trader


COLLECTORCOLLECTORCOLLECTORCOLLECTOR----TRADERTRADERTRADERTRADER

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



128 | P A G E

1. Company Name:.......................................................................................

2. Core Company Name:.......................................................................................

3. Owner /Trader’s Name:…....................................................................................

4. Address (of location of the poultry):

…....................................................................................

.........................................................................................

5. GPS details:

........................................................................................

........................................................................................

6. Do you own a poultry slaughter site: Yes/No*

7. Company Profile

We would like to know about your company:

STOCKPEN CAPACITY SLAUGHTER AREA*)

VENTURE TYPE EXPERIENCE

(YEAR) Area (m2)

Capacity

(chicken) Area (m2)

Slaughter

Volume

(chicken/day)

What sort of legal

status does your

venture belong

to?

How long has

your venture

been

established?

How many m2

does your

establishment

manage?

What is the total

capacity of your

stockpen?

What is the

area (m2) of

your

slaughter

site?

How many

chicken in

average do you

regularly

slaughter per

day?

� PT � CV

� No legal status

� <1 year � 1-3 years � >3 years

..........................

m2

� Chicken……….

� Ducks…………..

� The

others………

........................

..

m2

�

Chicken……….

�

Ducks…………..

� The

others………

*)for traders with poultry-slaughter site only

8. Poultry Profile

We would like to know about the types of poultry you trade daily.

POULTRY TYPE VOLUME (CHICKEN/DAY) SOURCE

NO What sort of poultry

do you venture?

How many chicken in

average do you trade

daily (per poultry type)?

From where (sub-district or

village) do you generally get

the poultry (type)?

1 Broiler ……………chicken/day ……………………………………

2 Spent layer ……………chicken/day …………………………………… 3 Kampong chicken ……………chicken/day …………………………………… 4 Duck ……………duck/day …………………………………… 5. Other poultry: ……..

6. Other poultry…….


129 | P A G E


We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of the last 3 years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE

LAST OCCURENCE TYPE OF POULTRY

SUFFERRED MORBIDITY MORTALITY

CLINICAL

SYMPTOMS DIAGNOSED BY HANDLING

What diseases

did the poultry

suffer from within

the last 3 years?

How many the

last 3 years

disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

What types of

poultry were

affected by (the

disease)?

How many (poultry) were

infected (by disease)?

How many (poultry)

were dead (by

disease)?

Please

elaborate the

symptoms of

such disease

Who confirmed

the disease?

What was

the

handling

on such

disease?

1 Avian Influenza

month year � Broiler

� Spent layer

� Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

chicken

� Kampong chicken

: chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

................chicken

� Kampong

chicken:

.................chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

2 ND/tetelo


� Spent layer

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Broiler:

..........chicken

□ Official from

Dinas


130 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


� Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Spent layer:

........chicken

� Kampong

chicken:.........chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

� Spent layer:

..........chicken

� Kampong

chicken:…..chicke

n

� Duck:

.................duck

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

3 Gumboro


� Spent layer

� Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

........chicken

� Kampong

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

.......chicken

� Kampong

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:


131 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


chicken:....chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

chicken:….chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

................

4 The others


� Spent layer

� Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

........chicken

� Kampong

chicken:....chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

.......chicken

� Kampong

chicken:….chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................


132 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


5 The others


� Spent layer

� Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

........chicken

� Kampong

chicken:....chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

� Broiler:

..........chicken

� Spent layer:

.......chicken

� Kampong

chicken:….chicken

� Duck:

.................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................


133 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


10. Product Marketing

We would like to know about your product marketing.

VOLUME (PRODUCT/DAY) TRADING SERVICE NO POULTRY TYPE

LIVE POULTRY CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED CONSUMER TYPE

What types of

poultry do you

trade?

How many live poultry

in average do you

trade (poultry type)

daily?

How much carcass in


(poultry type) daily?

Do your customers

come to you for

products or do you

deliver them to your

customers?

Who are your customers?


134 | P A G E


LIVE POULTRY CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED CONSUMER TYPE

1 Broiler ……………chicken/day ……………chicken/day

Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. Slaughterhouse

5. ...............................

2 Spent layer ……………chicken/day ……………chicken/day

Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. Slaughterhouse

5. ...............................

3 Other (please

name)

……………poultry/day ……………poultry/day Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. Slaughterhouse

5. ...............................


135 | P A G E

11. Facility

We would like to know about the existing facilities at your establishment.

NO. FACILITY CATEGORY REMARKS

1 What is the source for your water? � Tap water

� Artesian/drilled well

� Well

� River

� Irrigation

� Pond

� Lake

� Other: .......................................

2 What kind of waste processing system do you

apply?

a. Solid waste:

� Buried

� Burned

� Processed for compost

� Other............................................

b. Liquid waste:

� Dump pool

� Canalled into river/open water

� Other.............................................

c. Combination of solid and liquid waste

system:

� Dump pool


� Buried


� Other.............................................

3 Is the stockpen well-ventilated? � Yes

� No

4 Is the stockpen equipped with fan? � Yes

� No

5 Is there a place for treating sick poultry? � Yes

� No


136 | P A G E


6 How do you deal with dead poultry? � Buried

� Burned

� Other..................................................................

7. Do you desinfect the stock pens � Yes, desinfection type :

.........................frequency of

desinfection.................times/........

� No

8. Do you have facilities for disinfection of poultry

crates

� Yes, Type of facilities :................................

� No

9. Do you have facilites for desinfection of vehicles

transporting poultry


� No

10 Please name any other facilities, if any:

...........................................................................

...........................................................................


137 | P A G E

E. Questionnaire for Slaughterhouse


POULTRY SLAUGHTER PLACEPOULTRY SLAUGHTER PLACEPOULTRY SLAUGHTER PLACEPOULTRY SLAUGHTER PLACE

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



138 | P A G E

1. Company Name: ........................................................................................

2. Core Company Name: .......................................................................................

3. Owner/Trader: .......................................................................................

4. Address : .......................................................................................

.......................................................................................

5. GPS details: .......................................................................................

.......................................................................................

6. Company Profile

We would like to know about your establishment.

STOCKPEN CAPACITY SLAUGHTER AREA*)

VENTURE TYPE EXPERIENCE

(YEAR) Area (m2)

Capacity

(chicken) Area (m2)

Slaughter

Volume

(chicken/da

y)

What sort of legal

status does your

venture belong

to?

How long has

your venture

been

established?

How many

m2 does your

establishmen

t manage?

What is the

total

capacity

of your

stockpen?

What is

the area

(m2) of

your

slaughter

site?

How many

chicken in

average do

you regularly

slaughter per

day?

� PT � CV

� No legal status

� <1 year � 1-3 years � >3 years

.......................

...

m2

....................

..... chicken

..................

..... m2

.......................

...

.......................

...

chicken

7. Poultry Profile

We would like to know about the types of poultry you trade daily.

POULTRY TYPE VOLUME (CHICKEN/DAY) SOURCE

NO What sort of poultry

do you venture?

How many chicken in


daily (per poultry type)?

From where (sub-

district or village) do

you generally get the

poultry (type)?

1 Broiler ……………chicken/day ……………..

2 Spent layer ……………chicken/day ……………..

3 Kampong chicken ……………chicken/day ……………..

4 Duck ……………duck/day ……………..

5. Other poultry; …..

6. Other poultry: ….


139 | P A G E


We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in your poultry venture within the period of last three years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


What diseases

did the poultry

suffer from within

the last year?

How many the last 3

years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

What types of

poultry were

affected by (the

disease)?

How many (poultry)

were infected (by

disease)?

How many (poultry)

were dead (by

disease)?

Please

elaborate the

symptoms of

such disease

Who confirmed

the disease?

What was the

handling on

such disease?

1 Avian Influenza

month year � Broiler � Spent layer � Kampong

chicken

� Duck

� Broiler: ..........chicken

� Spent layer: ................chicken

� Kampong chicken:

.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

2 ND/tetelo



� Spent layer:


� Spent layer:

□ Official from

Dinas


140 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


chicken

� Duck ................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

3 Gumboro


chicken

� Duck







□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian


141 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Other:

................

4 The Others


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck:




.................chicken

� Duck:

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................


142 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY OF 3

LAST YEAR

OCCURANCE



CLINICAL


.................duck .................duck

5 The others


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................


143 | P A G E

9. Product Marketing

We would like to know about your product marketing.


CARCASS DIRECT DELIVERED CONSUMER TYPE

What types of poultry

do you trade?

How much carcass in average

do you trade (poultry type)

daily?

Do your customers come to

you for products or do you

deliver them to your

customers?

Who are your customers?

1 Broiler ……………chicken/day

Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. ...............................

2 Spent layer ……………chicken/day

Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. ...............................

3 Other (please name) ……………poultry/day Yes No

1 2

Yes No

1 2

1. Catering

2. Trader

3. Restaurant

4. ...............................


144 | P A G E

Facility

We would like to know about the existing facilities at your establishment.




� Well

� River

� Irrigation

� Pond

� Lake

� Other: .......................................


apply?

d. Solid waste:

� Buried

� Burned


� Other............................................

e. Liquid waste:

� Dump pool


� Other.............................................

f. Combination of solid and liquid waste

system:

� Dump pool


� Buried


� Other.............................................

3 Is the stockpen well-ventilated? � Yes

� No

4 Is the stockpen equipped with fan? � Yes

� No


� No


145 | P A G E



� Burned

� Other..................................................................

7. Do you desinfect the stock pens � Yes, desinfection type :

.........................frequency of

desinfection.................times/........

� No

8. Do you have facilities for disinfection of poultry

crates


� No

9. Do you have facilites for desinfection of vehicles

transporting poultry


� No


...........................................................................

...........................................................................


146 | P A G E

F. Questionnaire for Wet Market


WET MARKETWET MARKETWET MARKETWET MARKET

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



147 | P A G E

1. Market Name : .............................................................................

2. Address : .............................................................................

3. GPS Details : .............................................................................

4. Number of Poultry Trader : ........................ traders

We would like to know about names of active traders, poultry type they trade, daily

trading volume, and the source of poultry

NO. TRADER NAME POULTRY TYPE VOLUME/DAY SOURCE

Please state the name of

the poultry trader.

What popultry type

do you trade?

How many poultry in average do

you trade daily?

Where (district) do

you get the

poultry to trade?

1 � Broiler � Spent layer � Kampong chicken

� Duck � Quails

� other

� Broiler: ..........chicken � Spent layer: ................chicken � Kampong chicken: .................

chicken

� Duck: ................. ducks � Quails....................quails

� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


148 | P A G E



� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................

14

� Broiler � Spent layer � Kampong chicken

� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken



149 | P A G E


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


� Duck � Quails

� other


chicken


� Other..........................


150 | P A G E


We would like to know about the disease history occurred here in the market within the period of the last 3 years.

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY

OF 3 LAST

YEAR

OCCURANC

E

LAST OCCURRENCE

TYPE OF

POULTRY

SUFFERED

MORBIDITY MORTALITY CLINICAL


What

diseases did

the poultry

suffer from

within the

last year?

How many

the last 3

years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

What types of

poultry were

affected by

(the disease)?

How many (poultry)

were infected (by

disease)?

How many (poultry)

were dead (by

disease)?

Please

elaborate

the

symptoms of

such

disease

Who confirmed

the disease?

What was the

handling on

such disease?

1. Avian

Influenza


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

� Broiler: ..........chicken � Spent layer:

................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

2 ND/tetelo


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck


................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................


151 | P A G E

NO DISEASE

FREQUENCY

OF 3 LAST

YEAR

OCCURANC

E

LAST OCCURRENCE

TYPE OF

POULTRY

SUFFERED

MORBIDITY MORTALITY CLINICAL


What

diseases did

the poultry

suffer from

within the

last year?

How many

the last 3

years disease

occurance?

When was the last

disease occurrence

(disease)?

(month and year)

What types of

poultry were

affected by

(the disease)?

How many (poultry)

were infected (by

disease)?

How many (poultry)

were dead (by

disease)?

Please

elaborate

the

symptoms of

such

disease

Who confirmed

the disease?

What was the

handling on

such disease?

3 Gumboro


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck


................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

4 Other

.......................


chicken

� Duck




.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck


................chicken


.................chicken

� Duck: .................duck

□ Official from

Dinas

□ Private

veterinarian

□ Other:

................

6. Do you run a slughter service? If Yes, proceed to the next form, if No the interview ends

7. Facility

We would like to know about the existing facilities at your market


152 | P A G E




� Well

� River

� Irrigation

� Pond

� Lake

� Other: .......................................


apply?

g. Solid waste:

� Buried

� Burned


� Other............................................

h. Liquid waste:

� Dump pool


� Other.............................................

i. Combination of solid and liquid waste

system:

� Dump pool


� Buried


� Other.............................................

3 Is the stockyard well-ventilated? � Yes

� No

4 Is the stockyard equipped with fan? � Yes

� No


� No


� Burned

� Other..................................................................


153 | P A G E


7 The desinfect � Yes, the type of disinfection: ……….

Frequency of disinfection

:…………………times/……..

� No


...........................................................................

...........................................................................


154 | P A G E

G. Questionnaire for Poultry Sector Infrastructure


POULTRY SECTOR INFRASTRUCTUREPOULTRY SECTOR INFRASTRUCTUREPOULTRY SECTOR INFRASTRUCTUREPOULTRY SECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



155 | P A G E

A. Veterinary Service Support (by the Government and Private Sector)

GPS Details : ……………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………….

(1). Please state the number and educational background/expertise of

human resource around Dinas/Sub Dinas Peternakan:

Please state the expertise/educational

background of human resource around your

establishment

Person Remarks

� Medical veterinary

� Animal husbandry

� Paramedic

� ……………………………

� ……………………………

� ……………………………

(2). Please name the existing facilities owned by Dinas/Sub Dinas Peternakan:

Facility Type Number Address GPS Details

� Laboratory

� Diagnostic equipment x x

� Animal Health Post

� ………………………..

� ………………………..

� ………………………..

(3). Please name the AI control and surveillance program applied for your

area:

Program Activity Year Applied

� AI Control Program

1) ____________________

2) ____________________

3) ____________________

4) ____________________

5) ____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

� AI Surveillance

1) ____________________

2) ____________________

3) ____________________

4) ____________________

5) ____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

(4). Was there any involvement of private sector in such activities or program

of AI control and surveillance in your area?

� Yes, there was.


156 | P A G E

� None (continue to part B)

(5). If “Yes”, please name the involved institution (private sector) and its

detailed activity in the following table:

Involved Institution Activity Remarks

� ……………………………………..

� AI control program:

……………………………

…………………………..

……………………………

� AI surveillance: ……………………………

…………………………..

……………………………

� Other activity, if any:

………………………….

…………………………..

……………………………

� ……………………………………..


……………………………

…………………………..

……………………………


…………………………..

……………………………


………………………….

…………………………..

……………………………

� ……………………………………..


……………………………

…………………………..

……………………………


…………………………..

……………………………


………………………….

…………………………..

……………………………


157 | P A G E

Involved Institution Activity Remarks

� ……………………………………..


……………………………

…………………………..

……………………………


…………………………..

……………………………


………………………….

…………………………..

……………………………

B. Association, Integration, and Participatory Disease Control Program

(1). Please name the active poultry association around your area, its

membership and activities:

Association

Number of Member

(person/farmer) in

each association

Activity Type/

Form of

Participation in

Disease Control

Program

Nature of

Membership

� ……………………………………..

� ……………………………………..

� ……………………………………..

� ……………………………………..

(2). Please state the number of active core farmers, plasma/partners, and

independent farmers around your area:

Groups Number of

Farmer

Number of Member

(for core farmer)

� Core farmer

� Plasma/partner

� Independent farmer

� Within the local area: ............……… farmers

� Outside the local area: ............…… farmers

(3). Please name the participatory poultry disease control program actively

implemented around your area:

Group Name Activity in the Implemented Poultry Disease

Control Program

� � ……………………………………….


158 | P A G E

� ……………………………………….

� ……………………………………….

�

� ……………………………………….

� ……………………………………….

� ……………………………………….

�

� ……………………………………….

� ……………………………………….

� ……………………………………….

C. Supplier and Trader of Production Input (Feed, Medicines, and Vaccine) at

site:

(1). Please state the name and address of active suppliers/traders of

production input at site:

Supplier/Trader Address GPS Details

� …………………………………………. ………………………………………….

� …………………………………………. ………………………………………….

� …………………………………………. ………………………………………….

� …………………………………………. …………………………………………..

� …………………………………………. …………………………………………..

(2). Please state the type and number of product traded by the above player:

Type of Product Volume/month Remarks

� Feed

� Medicine

� Vitamin

� Vaccine

�

�

(3). Please state the number of customers of each production input

supplier/trader:

Supplier/Trader Number of

Customer at Site Remarks

�

�

�


159 | P A G E

�

�

�


160 | P A G E

H. Questionnaire for Sector 4 Farm

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

SECTOR 4 POULTRY FARMERSECTOR 4 POULTRY FARMERSECTOR 4 POULTRY FARMERSECTOR 4 POULTRY FARMER (KAMPONG CHICKEN/DUCK)(KAMPONG CHICKEN/DUCK)(KAMPONG CHICKEN/DUCK)(KAMPONG CHICKEN/DUCK)

*) choose one


Sub-district : …………………………………………………………

Enumerator : …………………………………………………………



161 | P A G E

1. Owner: ...........................................................................................

2. Address: ...........................................................................................

...........................................................................................

3. GPS details: ...........................................................................................

...........................................................................................

4. Please state the number and type of poultry you currently keep:

Poultry Type Number

� Kampong Chicken

� Duck

� Swan

� ..................................

� ..................................

5. Please state the source of your seed:

Poultry Type Source

� Kampong Chicken � Local sub-district market

� Local district market

� Other farmer from the same sub-district

� Other farmer from the other sub-district

� Self-provision � Other source:

............................…………………..

� Duck � Local sub-district market





............................…………………..

� Swan � Local sub-district market





............................…………………..

� ................................

� Local sub-district market





............................…………………..


162 | P A G E

6. Please state the poultry and poultry-product marketing you currently apply:

Product Type Marketing

� Live poultry � Sold directly to local sub-district market

� Sold directly to local district market

� Fetched by collector trader � Other: ................................……………………………..

� Egg � Sold directly to local sub-district market



� Other:

............................................

� Sold directly to local sub-district market



7. Please state the objective of your poultry culture:

� Main livelihood

� Side venture

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

..........................

8. Have your poultry ever suffered from AI disease?

� Yes, please state the time: month ..................................................... year

........................

� Never (to question no. 11)

9. If ‘Yes’, how many of your poultry died at that time: .................. birds

10. How did you know that your poultry suffered from AI disease?

� Dinas paramedic

� Veterinarian from animal health post (poskeswan)

� Fellow farmer

� Other: ..............................................................................................

11. Is such a case still going on in your area?

� Yes, please state the time: month .................................................... year

.........................

� No

12. Have your poultry ever been vaccinated with AI/bird flu vaccine?

� Yes

� No, please state the

reason:.....................................................................................................................

..........

..................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................

.............. (skip to no. 15)

13. If ”Yes”, how many times have your poultry been vaccinated?

� Once

� Twice


163 | P A G E

� Three times

� More than three times


164 | P A G E

14. Who did the vaccination?

� Dinas paramedic

� Poskeswan veterinarian

� By yourself

� Other: ................................................................................................

15. Please state if any, the others AI vaccination that vaccinate for your poultry

(the answer can more than one) :

................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................

16. What poultry culture system do you apply?

� Poultry is kept inside a closed pen.

� Poultry is kept inside a fenced-yard with poultry pen

� Poultry is kept inside fenced-yard around the house

� Poultry is let loose around the house

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

........................

17. In order to prevent disease infection, do you apply particular actions to

people/thing that enters or leaves your poultry farm?

� Yes

� None (skip to no. 18)

18. If”Yes”, please state your actions:

(1)...................................................................................................................................

.................................

(2)...................................................................................................................................

.................................

(3)...................................................................................................................................

.................................

(4)...................................................................................................................................

.................................

(5)...................................................................................................................................

.................................

19. What is the usual way to keep your poultry’s feeding pot clean?

� Wash it daily

� Wash it once every three days

� Wash it once a week

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

....................

20. What is the usual way to keep your poultry’s drinking pot clean?

� Wash it daily

� Wash it once every three days

� Wash it once a week


165 | P A G E

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

....................

21. How do you keep clean the flock yard?

� Sweep it daily

� Sweep it once every three days

� Sweep it once a week

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

....................

22. How do you deal with flock manure?

� Pile it somewhere (open dumping)

� Pile it in a hole (close/open*)

� Store it in a sack

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

.................... * choose one

23. Do you usually report to local Dinas representative/KCD if you your flock

suffers from disease?

� Yes

� No, please state the reason:

............................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................

..................................................... (skip to no. 25)

24. If ”Yes”, how do you think the response from Dinas representative/KCD

toward your report?

� Very responsive

� Responsive

� Late

� Very late

25. If ”No”, how do you deal with the sick flock of yours?

� Sell them

� Slaughter them

� Separate them from the healthy ones for treatment

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

...............................

26. Do you usually report to local Dinas representative/KCD/Poskeswan if you find

out that your poultry dies suddenly?

� Yes (skip to no. 28)

� No

27. If ”No”, what do you do with the dead flock?

� Bury them

� Burn them

� Throw them away to the nearest river


166 | P A G E

� Other:

..................................................................................................................................

...............................

28. If you buy new poultry flock, what do you usually do?

� Directly put them together with the existing flock

� Separate them (no contact) with the existing flock for at least 2 weeks

� Other :

..................................................................................................................................

...............................


167 | P A G E

CHECKLIST FOR OBSERVATION THE BIOSECURITY CONDITION OF POULTRY CULTURE

No Condition Observation

1 Poultry Culture

System

� Poultry is kept inside a closed pen. � Poultry is kept inside a fenced-yard with poultry pen

� Poultry is kept inside fenced-yard around the house � Poultry is let loose around the house � Other:

...................................................................................................................

......

2 Type of Pen � Elevated � On the ground

� Other:

...................................................................................................................

......

3 The pen floor � Bamboo/wooden

� Wire

� Land � Cement

� Other:

...................................................................................................................

......

4 Pen Ventilation � Well-ventilated

� Poor-ventilated

5 Density � < 8 chicken/m2

� 8-10 chicken/m2

� > 10 chicken/m2

6 Pen Cleanliness � Very clean � Clean

� Fairly clean � Dirty � Very dirty

7 Feed pot cleanliness � Very clean � Clean


8 Drinking pot

cleanliness

� Very clean � Clean



168 | P A G E

No Condition Observation

9 Flock yard

cleanliness

� Very clean � Clean


10 Flock manure

handling

� Pile it somewhere (open dumping)

� Pile it in a hole (close/open*) � Store it in a sack � Other:

..........................................................................................................

...............

11 Flock traffic control

around the farm

� Yes. � None, the flock pen is open and there is no control on people or

other poultry traffic.

12 If ”Yes”, state the

form of control

applied (answer

could be more than

one)

� The flock pen is isolated against people or other poultry traffic � There is a place for washing/disinfection at the gate prior to

entering the farm area

� Other:

...................................................................................................................

......

13 Other conditions

related to

biosecurity needed

to be noted by

enumerator

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

.........................................................................

Documents

CRESCENT 2007 Poultry Sector Survey - Home | … 2007 Poultry Sector Survey Cianjur & Bandung Districts of West Java Indonesia Indonesian-Netherlands Partnership Project on the Control