Upload
coleen-edwards
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Creating Positive Futures: Role of School-wide
Positive Behavior Supports
George SugaiOSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & Research
University of ConnecticutNovember 6, 2008
www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org
My Charge
• Transition between Mary Ellen’s message of advocacy & sharing of practices
• Big Ideas & Organizer for Sessions
• Down Middle – Veterans & New Recruits
• Distraction re-direct - Teen Driver!
PURPOSE
Describe how 15 years of
SWPBS have shaped what we
are doing & going to do.
• Review SWPBS Basics• Describe Current/Future Directions• Summarize Recent Data
Review SWPBS Basics
SWPBS is about….
SW-PBS Logic!Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students(Zins & Ponti, 1990)
Evaluation Criteria
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingStudent Behavior
OUTCOMES
Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement
SupportingDecisionMaking
IntegratedElements
Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for
All Students,Staff, & Settings
Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group
Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior
Tertiary Prevention:Specialized
IndividualizedSystems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
~80% of Students
~15%
~5%
CONTINUUM OFSCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
ALL
SOME
FEW
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
• Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001)
• Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003)
• Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006)
• White House Conference on School Violence (2006)
• Positive, predictable school-wide climate
• High rates of academic & social success
• Formal social skills instruction
• Positive active supervision & reinforcement
• Positive adult role models
• Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort
Classroom
SWPBSPractices
Non-classroom Family
Student
School-w
ide
• Smallest #• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
1. Leadership team
2. Behavior purpose statement
3. Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4. Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior
6. Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations
7. Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation
School-wide
Teaching Matrix
SETTING
All Settings
Hallways Playgrounds CafeteriaLibrary/
Computer Lab
Assembly Bus
Respect Ourselves
Be on task.Give your best effort.
Be prepared.
Walk. Have a plan.
Eat all your food.Select healthy foods.
Study, read,
compute.
Sit in one spot.
Watch for your stop.
Respect Others
Be kind.Hands/feet
to self.Help/share
with others.
Use normal voice
volume.Walk to
right.
Play safe.Include others.Share
equipment.
Practice good table manners
Whisper.Return books.
Listen/watch.Use
appropriate applause.
Use a quiet voice.
Stay in your seat.
Respect Property
Recycle.Clean up after self.
Pick up litter.
Maintain physical space.
Use equipment properly.
Put litter in garbage can.
Replace trays &
utensils.Clean up
eating area.
Push in chairs.Treat books
carefully.
Pick up.Treat chairs appropriately
.
Wipe your feet.Sit
appropriately.
Exp
ecta
tions 1. S
OCIAL SKILL2. NATURAL
CONTEXT
3. BEHAVIOR
EXAMPLES
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
To
tal O
DR
s
Academic Years
FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals
SUSTAINED IMPACTPre
Post
• Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
Non-classroom
Franzen, K., & Kamps, D. (2008).
• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged
• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged
• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction
• Active supervision• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors• Effective academic instruction & curriculum
Classroom
Typical Contexts/ Routines
Classroom-Wide Rules/ExpectationsRespect Others Respect Property Respect Self
AllUse inside voice.
Raise hand to answer/talk.
Recycle paper.Put writing tools inside
desk.
Do your best.Ask.
Morning MeetingEyes on speaker.
Give brief answers.
Put announcements in desk.
Keep feet on floor.
Put check by my announcements.
HomeworkDo own work.
Turn in before lesson.
Put homework neatly in box.
Touch your work only.
Turn in lesson on time.Do homework
night/day before.
TransitionUse inside voice.
Keep hands to self.Put/get materials first.
Keep hands to self.Have plan.Go directly.
“I Need Assistance”
Raise hand or show “Assistance Card”.
Wait 2 minutes & try again.
Have materials ready.Have plan.
Ask if unclear.
Teacher DirectedEyes on speaker.
Keep hands to self.Use materials as
intended.Have plan.
Ask.
Independent WorkUse inside voice.
Keep hands to self.
Use materials as intended.
Return with done.
Use time as planned.Ask.
Problem to SolveStop, Step Back,
Think, ActStop, Step Back,
Think, ActStop, Step Back,
Think, Act
1. SOCIAL SKILL2. N
ATURAL
CONTEXT
3. BEHAVIOR
EXAMPLES
Allday & Pakurar (2007)
• Behavioral competence at school & district levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations
Individual Student
• Continuum of positive behavior support for all families
• Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements
• Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner
• Access to system of integrated school & community resources
Family
Family Teaching
Matrix
SETTING
At homeMorning Routine
HomeworkMeal
TimesIn Car Play Bedtime
Respect Ourselves
Respect Others
Respect Property
Exp
ecta
tions 1. S
OCIAL SKILL
2. NATURAL
CONTEXT
3. BEHAVIOR
EXAMPLES
Classroom
SWPBSPractices
Non-classroom Family
Student
School-w
ide
• Smallest #• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
“Train & Hope”
REACT toProblemBehavior
REACT toProblemBehavior
Select &ADD
Practice
Select &ADD
Practice
Hire EXPERTto TrainPractice
Hire EXPERTto TrainPractice
WAIT forNew
Problem
WAIT forNew
Problem
Expect, But HOPE for
Implementation
Expect, But HOPE for
Implementation
Agreements
Team
Data-based Action Plan
ImplementationEvaluation
GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS: “Getting Started”
Initiative, Committee
Purpose Outcome Target Group
Staff Involved
SIP/SID
Attendance Committee
Increase attendance
Increase % of students attending daily
All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee
Goal #2
Character Education
Improve character
Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen
Goal #3
Safety Committee
Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis
Dangerous students
Has not met Goal #3
School Spirit Committee
Enhance school spirit
Improve morale All students Has not met
Discipline Committee
Improve behavior
Decrease office referrals
Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders
Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis
Goal #3
DARE Committee
Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users
Don
EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model
Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades
All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma
Goal #2
Goal #3
Sample Teaming Matrix
Current Efforts & Future
Directions
Implementation Levels
Student
Classroom
School
State
District
Funding Visibility PoliticalSupport
Training Coaching Evaluation
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
PBS Systems Implementation Logic
Leadership TeamActive & Integrated Coordination
PBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org
Responsiveness-to-Intervention
It’s not just about behavior!
Good Teaching Behavior Management
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity
Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems
1-5% 1-5%
5-10% 5-10%
80-90% 80-90%
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive
Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive
Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
RtI
Response to Intervention
All
Some
FewRTI
Continuum of Support for
ALL
Dec 7, 2007
~80% of Students
~15%
~5%
ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS
SECONDARY PREVENTION• Check in/out• Targeted social skills instruction• Peer-based supports• Social skills club•
TERTIARY PREVENTION• Function-based support• Wraparound/PCP• Specialized individualised supports•
PRIMARY PREVENTION• Teach & encourage positive SW expectations• Proactive SW discipline• Effective instruction• Parent engagement•
Audit
1.Identify existing practices by tier
2.Specify outcome for each effort
3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness
4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes
5.Establish decision rules (RtI)
Practice Selection
•Evidence-based
•Measurable outcome aligned with need & student
•Rules for data-based decisions
•Integrated with related practices based on outcomes, need, student
•Implementation fidelity
•Continuous monitoring
Some Outcome Data
www.pbis.orgHorner, R., & Sugai, G. (2008). Is school-wide positive behavior support an evidence-based practice? OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support.
http://www.pbis.org/files/101007evidencebase4pbs.pdf.
Elementary School
Suspension Rate
Elementary School
Trends in Suspension Rates for PBS Schools Implementing w/ Fidelity & Maturity
Trends in Black & Hispanic Suspension Rates for PBS Schools Implementing w/ Fidelity & Maturity
National ODR/ISS/OSS July 2008
K-6 6-9 9-12# Sch 1756 476 177# Std 781,546 311,725 161,182# ODR 423,647 414,716 235,279
ISS # Evnt 6 38 38avg/100 # Day 12 49 61OSS # Evnt 6 30 24avg/100 # Day 10 74 61 # Expl 0.03 0.29 0.39
24091,254,4531,073,642
100,000 schools ~ 45,000,000 ODRs
July 2, 2008
ODR rates vary by level
July 2, 2008A few have big impact
Behavior varies by grade/year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 BL CI/CO
CI/CO +75%
CI/CO +80%
CI/CO +90%
Helena
School Days
Per
cen
t of
Int
erva
ls E
nga
ged
in P
robl
em
B
ehav
ior
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jade
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Farrell
Began meds.
Class B Results
GOALS 8:30 9:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 1:30
1. RESPECT OTHERS 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
2. MANAGE SELF 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
3. SOLVE PROBLEMS RESPONSIBLY
2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Name________________ Date ________
Rating Scale2 = Great1 = Ok0 = Goal Not Met
Goal _____Pts Possible _____Pts Received_____% of Pts _____Goal Met? Y N
Check In/Out Pt Card
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 BL CI/CO
CI/CO +75%
CI/CO +80%
CI/CO +90%
Helena
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jade
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Farrell
Began meds.
School Days
Per
cen
t of
Int
erva
ls E
nga
ged
in P
robl
em
Beh
avi
or
Class B Results + Composite Peers
Peer
Peer
Peer
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ben
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Marcellus
BL CI/CO
CI/CO75%
CI/CO80%
FB plan
FB plan 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Blair
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Olivia
Per
cen
t of
Int
erva
ls E
nga
ged
in P
robl
em
Beh
avi
or
Study 2 Results
School Days
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Olivia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Marcellus
BL CI/CO
CI/CO75%
CI/CO80%
FB plan
FB plan 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ben
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Blair
School Days
Per
cen
t of
Int
erva
ls E
nga
ged
in P
robl
em
Beh
avi
or
Peer
Peer
Peer
Peer
Study 2 Results + Composite Peer