1
Pharmacist Interven/ons (PI) are of an outstanding importance to prevent drug prescrip/on errors and improve pa/ent safety. Pharmacist review of drug prescrip/ons prevents drug related problems (DRP), as medica/on errors (ME) and adverse drug reac/ons (ADR) and improves pa/ent outcomes, add quality and safety to the drug treatment process. [1] The acceptance rate of PI can indicate the pharmacist exper/se and the pharmacist integra/on level within the clinical services. Moreover PI can be faced as an indicator of Pharmaceu/cal Care quality. Accordingly, it is required to measure the acceptance rate of PI by physicians and predict the reasons behind the iden/fied differences in order to understand which ac/ons are needed to improve pharmacist ac/vi/es in the hospital scope. The main purpose of our study was the evalua/on of the acceptance rate of these interven/ons by analysing the records of pharmacist ac/vi/es. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE STUDY DESIGN The analysis of acceptance rate of PIs reflects the level of accordance between pharmacists and prescribers and can foresee that the level of integra/on and exper/se of pharmacists concerning a specific clinical ac/vity can influence the acceptance of PI by prescribers, predic/ng that acceptance rate can be used as a quality indicator of Pharmaceu/cal Care. The results showed that the acceptance rate of pharmacist interven/ons related to serum levels’ monitoring was superior then the acceptance rate of pharmacist interven/ons on medica/on errors during prescrip/ons’ valida/on (99% to 60.7% of acceptability). Acceptance rate of ME PIs (60%) is acceptable however it revealed inferior to the range published in literature. [4, 5, 6] Regarding clinical units, Medical unit presented a higher rate of acceptability. Although Surgical unit showed a lower percentage of accepted PIs, the difference is not significant. Almost all types of ME PIs presented a posi/ve rate of acceptability. REFERENCES 1- Tully, M. P.; Buchan, I. E. (2009). Prescribing errors during hospital inpa3ent care: factors influencing iden3fica3on by pharmacists: Pharmacy World & Science : PWS, 31(6), 682–8. 2- Franklin, B. D.; Reynolds, M.; Shebl, N. A.; Burneg, S.; Jacklin, A. (2011). Prescribing errors in hospital inpa3ents: a three-centre study of their prevalence, types and causes: Postgraduate Medical Journal, 87(1033), 739–45. 3- Montaña, S. J.; Vilarrasa, L. C.; Muñoz, M. C.; Riera, G.; Arce, M. V.; Ruiz, A. B.; Mora, M.J.G. (2004). Detección y clasificación de errores de medicación en el Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Farmacia Hospitalaria, 28(2), 90–96. 4- Bourne, R. S.; Choo, C. L.; Dorward, B. J. (2014). Proac3ve clinical pharmacist interven3ons in cri3cal care: effect of unit speciality and other factors: The Interna/onal Journal of Pharmacy Prac/ce, 22(2), 146–54. 5 Gaspar, M.; Caja, M.; Romero, I.; Moreno Royo, L.; García-Vivó, A.; Tudela, V.; Piquer, M. (2009). Establecimiento de un indicador de calidad de atención farmacéu3ca: Farmacia Hospitalaria, 33(6), 296–304. Torner, M. Q. G.; Estradé, E. O.; Solernou, F. P. (2003). Atención farmacéu3ca en los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos en enfermos hospitalizados: Farmacia Hospitalaria, 27(5), 280–289. 6- Gallagher, J.; Byrne, S.; Woods, N.; Lynch, D.; McCarthy, S. (2014). Cost-outcome descrip3on of clinical pharmacist interven3ons in a university teaching hospital: BMC Health Services Research, 14, 177. Contacts: [email protected] ; [email protected] . Disclosure of Interest: None Declared Prospec/ve study of the acceptance rate of two dis/nct specialized Pharmacist Interven/ons: Medica/on errors (ME) PI and Clinic Pharmacokine/cs (CPK) PI at an university hospital between March 1 and December 31, 2013. 1 Department Pharmacy, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Coimbra – Director J.Feio 2 Economics Faculty, Coimbra University Coimbra, Portugal J.Tuna 2 , M.J.Rocha 1 , E.Cunha 1 , P.Ferreira 2 , J. Massano 1 ANALYSIS OF PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS’ACCEPTANCE RATE IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL RESULTS During the study 4 872 PI were recorded in 2 362 pa/ents with an average age of 67.6±17.0 years old: 18-64 – 39%; 65-74 – 21%; 75-84 – 27%; ≥ 85 – 13%). Regarding the ME PI, 1.918 PI were performed with an acceptance rate of 60.7%. Of these, 49.9% didn’t present any jus/fica/on for the unacceptability, 29.3% were not clinically jus/fied, 19.9% were due to transfer or discharge, and less than 1% was due pa/ent death. Regarding clinical services, 56.2% of ME PIs were performed in medical services and 43.8% in surgical services and the medical services presented an upper acceptance rate when compared with surgical services. Regarding the CPK PI, which included serum levels monitoring of vancomycin, aminoglycosides and digoxin, the acceptance rate was 99%. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of acceptance rate of PIs provided informa/on on the main clinical areas and medicines and the most frequent types of ME that required special agen/on, contribu/ng to the implementa/on of preven/ve measures regarding clinical pharmacist ac/vi/es in order to improve pa/ent safety and the efficiency of healthcare provision. Figure 1 – Scheme of study methodology and data collec/on. Figure 1 – Acceptance rate of ME PI and main reasons of unacceptability. Figure 2 – Acceptance rate of ME PIs in clinical units (Medical and Surgical). All the informa/on about interven/ons and its acceptance was obtained from the computerized physician order entry system (SGICM) and respec/ve pharmaceu/cal database. ME classifica/on: wrong drug, dose omission, incorrect dose, incorrect length of treatment, incorrect dose range, wrong schedule, wrong administra/on route, inadequate monitoring, therapeu/c duplica/on, not /mely IV/Oral sequen/al therapy, dose adjustment for renal or hepa/c failure. Monitoring and Clinic pharmacokine/cs: amikacin, digoxin, phenytoin, gentamicin, vancomycin, tobramycin 19.9% 29.3% 0.8% 49.9% Transfer or discharge Not clinically jus/fied Pa/ent died Unjus/fied 64% 49% 36% 51% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Medical Surgical Accepted Not accepted 60.7% 39.3% Accepted Not accepted RESULTS 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Accepted Not accepted 11% 60% 29% Without PK adjustment Infradosing Overdosing Legend: R1 – Drug introduc/on; R2 – Drug discon/nua/on; R3 – Dose changing; R4 – Dose range modifica/on; R5 – Dosing form modifica/on; R6 – Changing for a more effec/ve drug; R9 – Changing for a more effec/ve route of administra/on; R10 – Changing for a safer route of administra/on; R13 – PK/PD monitoring recommenda/on; R15 – Avoiding unjus/fied prescrip/on; R16 – Pharmacist therapeu/c proposal; R19 – Preven/ng drug failure; R21 – Changing presenta/on. Figure 3 – Acceptance rate of ME PIs in each ME PI. Figure 4 – Percentage of CPK PIs with 99% of acceptability. DISCUSSION CP-235

CP-235 ANALYSIS OF PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS’ … · formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins. ... (CPK) PI at an university hospital between March 1 and December

  • Upload
    vunga

  • View
    219

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CP-235 ANALYSIS OF PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS’ … · formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins. ... (CPK) PI at an university hospital between March 1 and December

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES IGN GUIDE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces an A0 presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QUICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations

Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTEDCornerhandles

Good

prin

/ngqu

ality

Badprin/n

gqu

ality

QUICK START (cont. )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables

To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint or “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©2015PosterPresenta/ons.com2117FourthStreet,[email protected] POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015

www.PosterPresentations.com

Pharmacist Interven/ons (PI) are of an outstanding importance to prevent drugprescrip/onerrorsandimprovepa/entsafety.Pharmacistreviewofdrugprescrip/onsprevents drug related problems (DRP), as medica/on errors (ME) and adverse drugreac/ons (ADR) and improves pa/ent outcomes, add quality and safety to the drugtreatmentprocess.[1]The acceptance rate of PI can indicate the pharmacist exper/se and the pharmacistintegra/onlevelwithintheclinicalservices.MoreoverPIcanbefacedasanindicatorofPharmaceu/calCarequality.Accordingly,itisrequiredtomeasuretheacceptancerateofPIbyphysiciansandpredictthereasonsbehindtheiden/fieddifferencesinordertounderstandwhich ac/ons areneeded to improvepharmacist ac/vi/es in thehospitalscope.

The main purpose of our study was the evalua/on of the acceptance rate of theseinterven/onsbyanalysingtherecordsofpharmacistac/vi/es.

BACKGROUNDANDOBJECTIVE

STUDYDESIGN

The analysis of acceptance rate of PIs reflects the level of accordance betweenpharmacistsandprescribersandcanforeseethatthelevelofintegra/onandexper/seofpharmacists concerninga specificclinicalac/vitycan influence theacceptanceofPIbyprescribers, predic/ng that acceptance rate can be used as a quality indicator ofPharmaceu/calCare.The results showed that the acceptance rate of pharmacist interven/ons related toserum levels’ monitoring was superior then the acceptance rate of pharmacistinterven/ons on medica/on errors during prescrip/ons’ valida/on (99% to 60.7% ofacceptability). Acceptance rate of ME PIs (60%) is acceptable however it revealedinferiortotherangepublishedinliterature.[4,5,6]

Regardingclinicalunits,Medicalunitpresentedahigherrateofacceptability.AlthoughSurgicalunitshowedalowerpercentageofacceptedPIs,thedifferenceisnotsignificant.AlmostalltypesofMEPIspresentedaposi/verateofacceptability.

REFERENCES1- Tully,M. P.; Buchan, I. E. (2009).Prescribing errors during hospital inpa3ent care: factors influencing iden3fica3on by pharmacists: PharmacyWorld &Science :PWS,31(6),682–8.2-Franklin,B.D.;Reynolds,M.;Shebl,N.A.;Burneg,S.; Jacklin,A. (2011).Prescribingerrors inhospital inpa3ents:athree-centrestudyoftheirprevalence,typesandcauses:PostgraduateMedicalJournal,87(1033),739–45.3-Montaña,S.J.;Vilarrasa,L.C.;Muñoz,M.C.;Riera,G.;Arce,M.V.;Ruiz,A.B.;Mora,M.J.G.(2004).DetecciónyclasificacióndeerroresdemedicaciónenelHospitalUniversitariJoanXXIII,FarmaciaHospitalaria,28(2),90–96.4-Bourne,R.S.;Choo,C.L.; Dorward,B. J. (2014).Proac3veclinicalpharmacist interven3ons incri3calcare:effectofunitspecialityandotherfactors:TheInterna/onalJournalofPharmacyPrac/ce,22(2),146–54.5Gaspar,M.; Caja,M.;Romero, I.;MorenoRoyo,L.;García-Vivó,A.;Tudela,V.;Piquer,M. (2009).Establecimientodeun indicadordecalidaddeatenciónfarmacéu3ca: Farmacia Hospitalaria, 33(6), 296–304. Torner, M. Q. G.; Estradé, E. O.; Solernou, F. P. (2003). Atención farmacéu3ca en los problemasrelacionadosconlosmedicamentosenenfermoshospitalizados:FarmaciaHospitalaria,27(5),280–289.6-Gallagher, J.; Byrne, S.;Woods,N.; Lynch,D.;McCarthy, S. (2014).Cost-outcomedescrip3onof clinical pharmacist interven3ons in a university teachinghospital:BMCHealthServicesResearch,14,177.

Contacts:[email protected];[email protected]:NoneDeclared

Prospec/ve study of the acceptance rate of two dis/nct specialized PharmacistInterven/ons: Medica/on errors (ME) PI and Clinic Pharmacokine/cs (CPK) PI at anuniversityhospitalbetweenMarch1andDecember31,2013.

1DepartmentPharmacy,CentroHospitalareUniversitárioCoimbra–DirectorJ.Feio2EconomicsFaculty,CoimbraUniversity

Coimbra,Portugal

J.Tuna2,M.J.Rocha1,E.Cunha1,P.Ferreira2,J.Massano1ANALYSISOFPHARMACISTINTERVENTIONS’ACCEPTANCERATEINATERTIARYHOSPITAL

RESULTS

During the study 4 872 PI were recorded in 2 362 pa/ents with an average age of67.6±17.0yearsold:18-64–39%;65-74–21%;75-84–27%;≥85–13%).Regarding theME PI, 1.918 PIwere performedwith an acceptance rate of 60.7%.Ofthese, 49.9% didn’t present any jus/fica/on for the unacceptability, 29.3% were notclinically jus/fied,19.9%weredueto transferordischarge,and less than1%wasduepa/entdeath.Regardingclinical services,56.2%ofMEPIswereperformed inmedicalservices and 43.8% in surgical services and themedical services presented an upperacceptanceratewhencomparedwithsurgicalservices.Regarding the CPK PI, which included serum levels monitoring of vancomycin,aminoglycosidesanddigoxin,theacceptanceratewas99%.

CONCLUSIONSTheanalysisof acceptance rateofPIsprovided informa/onon themain clinical areasand medicines and the most frequent types of ME that required special agen/on,contribu/ngtotheimplementa/onofpreven/vemeasuresregardingclinicalpharmacistac/vi/esinordertoimprovepa/entsafetyandtheefficiencyofhealthcareprovision.

Figure1–Schemeofstudymethodologyanddatacollec/on.

Figure1–AcceptancerateofMEPIandmainreasonsofunacceptability.

Figure2–AcceptancerateofMEPIsinclinicalunits(MedicalandSurgical).

Alltheinforma/onaboutinterven/onsanditsacceptancewasobtainedfromthe

computerizedphysicianorderentrysystem(SGICM)andrespec/vepharmaceu/cal

database.

MEclassifica/on:wrongdrug,doseomission,incorrectdose,incorrectlengthoftreatment,incorrectdoserange,wrongschedule,wrongadministra/onroute,inadequatemonitoring,therapeu/cduplica/on,not/melyIV/Oral

sequen/altherapy,doseadjustmentforrenalorhepa/cfailure.

MonitoringandClinicpharmacokine/cs:amikacin,digoxin,phenytoin,gentamicin,vancomycin,

tobramycin

19.9%

29.3%0.8%

49.9%

Transferordischarge Notclinicallyjus/fied

Pa/entdied Unjus/fied

64%

49%

36%

51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Medical Surgical

Accepted Notaccepted

60.7%

39.3%

Accepted Notaccepted

RESULTS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Accepted Notaccepted

11%

60%

29%

WithoutPKadjustment Infradosing Overdosing

Legend:R1–Drug introduc/on;R2–Drugdiscon/nua/on;R3–Dosechanging;R4–Dose rangemodifica/on; R5–Dosing form modifica/on; R6 – Changing for a more effec/ve drug; R9 – Changing for a more effec/ve route ofadministra/on; R10 – Changing for a safer route of administra/on; R13 – PK/PDmonitoring recommenda/on; R15 –Avoidingunjus/fiedprescrip/on;R16–Pharmacisttherapeu/cproposal;R19–Preven/ngdrugfailure;R21–Changingpresenta/on.

Figure3–AcceptancerateofMEPIsineachMEPI.

Figure4–PercentageofCPKPIswith99%ofacceptability.

DISCUSSION

CP-235