10
Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 1424 COVID-19 and gynecological cancer: a review of the published guidelines Christina Uwins, 1 Geetu Prakash Bhandoria , 2 TS Shylasree, 3 Simon Butler-Manuel, 1 Patricia Ellis, 1 Jayanta Chatterjee, 1 Anil Tailor, 1 Alexandra Stewart, 4 Agnieszka Michael 5 For numbered affiliations see end of article. Correspondence to Dr Geetu Prakash Bhandoria, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Command Hospital Pune, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India; [email protected] Received 18 May 2020 Revised 4 June 2020 Accepted 8 June 2020 Published Online First 23 June 2020 To cite: Uwins C, Bhandoria GP, Shylasree TS, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. Review © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Original research Editorials Joint statement Society statement Meeting summary Review articles Consensus statement Clinical trial Case study Video articles Educational video lecture Corners of the world Commentary Letters ijgc.bmj.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER ABSTRACT On March 11, 2020 the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a ‘pandemic’ by the World Health Organization. COVID-19 is associated with higher surgical morbidity and mortality. An array of guidelines on the management of cancer during this pandemic have been published since the first reports of the outbreak. This narrative review brings all the relevant information from the guidelines together into one document, to support patient care. We present a detailed review of published guidelines, statements, comments from peer-reviewed journals, and nationally/ internationally recognized professional bodies and societies' web pages (in English or with English translation available) between December 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020. Search terms included combinations of COVID, SARS- COV-2, guideline, gynecology, oncology, gynecological, cancer. Recommendations for surgical and oncological prioritization of gynecological cancers are discussed and summarized. The role of minimally invasive surgery, patient perspectives, medico-legal aspects, and clinical trials during the pandemic are also discussed. The consensus is that elective benign surgery should cease and cancer surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy should continue based on prioritization. Patient and staff face-to-face interactions should be limited, and health resources used efficiently using prioritization strategies. This review and the guidelines on which it is based support the difficult decisions currently facing us in gynecological cancer. It is a balancing act: limited resources and a hostile environment pitted against the time-sensitive nature of cancer treatment. We can only hope to do our best for our patients with the resources available to us. BACKGROUND On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization Director-General declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic on the basis of its spread and severity. 1 Early reports in the first nationwide analysis from China, published in mid-February 2020, purported to indicate a 3.5 times higher risk of needing mechan- ical ventilation, intensive care admission, or dying in patients with a history of cancer compared with those without. 2 The ongoing CovidSurg project, a new inter- national multi-center study, has provided data from 1129 patients with COVID-19 operated on during this time. Findings showed a high overall mortality rate of 24% and pulmonary complication rate of 51%. Most deaths followed pulmonary complications (83%), and elective surgery was associated with a 19% mortality risk. These data support the cancelation or post- ponement of elective surgeries during the ongoing pandemic. 3 Global predictive modeling estimates that 28 404 603 operations will have been canceled or postponed worldwide during the peak 12 weeks of disruption due to COVID-19. 4 It is estimated that, if countries increase their normal surgical volume by 20% following the resolution of the pandemic, it will take a median of 45 weeks to clear the backlog of operations resulting from the COVID-19 disruption. 4 There is an emergent need to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on the care of cancer patients requiring surgery. CovidSurg-Cancer and CovidSurg- Cancer Gynecological Oncology are international multi-center studies launched to understand this question. Data collection was ongoing for these studies at the time of submission of this review. 5 Since the beginning of March 2020 an array of guidelines, statements, and comments have been published on the management of gynecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed and summarized the surgical and oncolog- ical prioritization strategies in circumstances where capacity is limited. Capacity varies between countries and even within each country. Many recommendations are pragmatic deviations from 'standard of care' management, aiming to balance the risk of treatment and available resources during this pandemic. It remains to be seen how short-term and long-term oncological outcomes will be affected. Treatment escalation plans and patients’ wishes regarding resuscitation should therefore be discussed openly with patients for a range of different eventualities and documented in the medical notes. The guidelines reviewed here reflect choices made by clinicians during the current pandemic and help with the decision-making process. METHODS We performed electronic searches of Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar for guidelines, state- ments, or comments (in English or with English translation available) published between December 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020. Those published in peer-reviewed journals or on nationally/internation- ally recognized professional bodies’/societies’ web on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://ijgc.bmj.com/ Int J Gynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. Downloaded from

COVID-19 and gynecological cancer: a review of the published … · 1424 uwins C etfial Int J Gynecol Cancer 202030:14241433 doi:101136igc-2020-001634 COVID-19 and gynecological cancer:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-0016341424

    COVID-19 and gynecological cancer: a review of the published guidelines

    Christina Uwins,1 Geetu Prakash Bhandoria ,2 TS Shylasree,3 Simon Butler- Manuel,1 Patricia Ellis,1 Jayanta Chatterjee,1 Anil Tailor,1 Alexandra Stewart,4 Agnieszka Michael5

    For numbered affiliations see end of article.

    Correspondence toDr Geetu Prakash Bhandoria, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Command Hospital Pune, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India; doctor_ 071277@ yahoo. co. in

    Received 18 May 2020Revised 4 June 2020Accepted 8 June 2020Published Online First 23 June 2020

    To cite: Uwins C, Bhandoria GP, Shylasree TS, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433.

    Review

    © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re- use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

    Original research

    Editorials

    Joint statement

    Society statement

    Meeting summary

    Review articles

    Consensus statement

    Clinical trial

    Case study

    Video articles

    Educational video lecture

    Corners of the world

    Commentary

    Letters

    ijgc.bmj.com

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF

    GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER

    AbstrACtOn March 11, 2020 the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a ‘pandemic’ by the World Health Organization. COVID-19 is associated with higher surgical morbidity and mortality. An array of guidelines on the management of cancer during this pandemic have been published since the first reports of the outbreak. This narrative review brings all the relevant information from the guidelines together into one document, to support patient care. We present a detailed review of published guidelines, statements, comments from peer- reviewed journals, and nationally/internationally recognized professional bodies and societies' web pages (in English or with English translation available) between December 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020. Search terms included combinations of COVID, SARS- COV-2, guideline, gynecology, oncology, gynecological, cancer. Recommendations for surgical and oncological prioritization of gynecological cancers are discussed and summarized. The role of minimally invasive surgery, patient perspectives, medico- legal aspects, and clinical trials during the pandemic are also discussed. The consensus is that elective benign surgery should cease and cancer surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy should continue based on prioritization. Patient and staff face- to- face interactions should be limited, and health resources used efficiently using prioritization strategies. This review and the guidelines on which it is based support the difficult decisions currently facing us in gynecological cancer. It is a balancing act: limited resources and a hostile environment pitted against the time- sensitive nature of cancer treatment. We can only hope to do our best for our patients with the resources available to us.

    bACkgrOunD

    On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization Director- General declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic on the basis of its spread and severity.1 Early reports in the first nationwide analysis from China, published in mid- February 2020, purported to indicate a 3.5 times higher risk of needing mechan-ical ventilation, intensive care admission, or dying in patients with a history of cancer compared with those without.2 The ongoing CovidSurg project, a new inter-national multi- center study, has provided data from 1129 patients with COVID-19 operated on during this time. Findings showed a high overall mortality rate of 24% and pulmonary complication rate of 51%. Most deaths followed pulmonary complications (83%), and elective surgery was associated with a 19% mortality

    risk. These data support the cancelation or post-ponement of elective surgeries during the ongoing pandemic.3 Global predictive modeling estimates that 28 404 603 operations will have been canceled or postponed worldwide during the peak 12 weeks of disruption due to COVID-19.4 It is estimated that, if countries increase their normal surgical volume by 20% following the resolution of the pandemic, it will take a median of 45 weeks to clear the backlog of operations resulting from the COVID-19 disruption.4 There is an emergent need to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on the care of cancer patients requiring surgery. CovidSurg- Cancer and CovidSurg- Cancer Gynecological Oncology are international multi- center studies launched to understand this question. Data collection was ongoing for these studies at the time of submission of this review.5

    Since the beginning of March 2020 an array of guidelines, statements, and comments have been published on the management of gynecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed and summarized the surgical and oncolog-ical prioritization strategies in circumstances where capacity is limited. Capacity varies between countries and even within each country.

    Many recommendations are pragmatic deviations from 'standard of care' management, aiming to balance the risk of treatment and available resources during this pandemic. It remains to be seen how short- term and long- term oncological outcomes will be affected. Treatment escalation plans and patients’ wishes regarding resuscitation should therefore be discussed openly with patients for a range of different eventualities and documented in the medical notes. The guidelines reviewed here reflect choices made by clinicians during the current pandemic and help with the decision- making process.

    MethODs

    We performed electronic searches of Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar for guidelines, state-ments, or comments (in English or with English translation available) published between December 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020. Those published in peer- reviewed journals or on nationally/internation-ally recognized professional bodies’/societies’ web

    on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

    http://ijgc.bmj.com

    /Int J G

    ynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. D

    ownloaded from

    http://bmjopen.bmj.com/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-7856http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2020-08-19http://ijgc.bmj.com/

  • 1425Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    Table 1 Timeline of guidelines

    General oncology guidelinesDate of issue/publication (year 2020)

    Haut Conseil de Santé Publique6 March 14

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence39 March 20

    National Health Service (NHS)12 March 23

    American College of Surgeons (Statement)60 March 24

    Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons & European Association for Endoscopic Surgery30

    March 29

    Italian Society of Surgical Oncology, Italian Association of Medical Oncology and Italian Association of Radiation Oncology joint statement9 (Statement)

    March 23

    National Comprehensive Care Network10 April 5 (accepted for publication March 16)

    American Society of Clinical Oncology36 April 28 (accepted for publication April 8)

    Medical Oncology Group of Australia8 April 16 (published May 13)

    Gynecological cancer statements/guidelines

    British Gynaecological Cancer Society7 March 22 (updated v2.0 April 13, v3.0 May 5)

    Society of Gynecologic Oncology49 March 23

    European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups45 March 23

    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer51 March 27 (accepted March 24)

    American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (Statement)32 March 27

    Australia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group47 March 31

    European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) Statement61 March 31

    Groupe de Recherche en chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique interest group of Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français15

    April 1

    Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery31 April 3

    Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada16 April 7

    Italian Society for Colposcopy and Cervico- Vaginal Pathology55 April 8

    British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology54 April 9

    European Society of Medical Oncology56 62 63 April (accessed April 19)

    Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology17 May 8

    European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC)- European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO)59

    May

    pages were included (first guideline published on 14 March, 2020). Reference lists were hand- searched to identify any pertinent arti-cles that had been missed. Search terms included combinations of: COVID, SARS- COV-2, guideline, gynecology, oncology, gyneco-logical, cancer, and variant spellings. Comments, perspectives, and correspondence published in various journals have not been incor-porated in this review.

    results

    evolution of the guidelinesThe first set of publicly available guidelines appeared in France. The French High Council for Public Health (Haut Conseil de Santé Publique) formally released their guidelines on March 14, 2020. These were followed by a series of guidelines/recommendations

    published by several national/international professional societies/bodies, as listed in Table 1.6 Due to the rapidly evolving nature of this pandemic, guidelines are based on expert opinion because of the lack of available robust scientific evidence.

    recommendations on reduction of infection rate ► Identification of patients: COVID-19 screening clinics ► Testing patients admitted for treatment/surgery depending on

    available resources or based on symptoms within 14 days ► Strict tracing of patients' contacts ► Establishing isolated areas for COVID patients ► 'Clean/COVID-19- free' hospital sites for cancer surgery7

    ► Work from home/separated teams to maintain the workforce ► Travel restrictions

    on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

    http://ijgc.bmj.com

    /Int J G

    ynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. D

    ownloaded from

    http://ijgc.bmj.com/

  • 1426 Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    ► Fever/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- COV-2) screening for staff and visitors

    ► Social distancing ► Frequent disinfection of areas which are touched frequently

    such as door knobs, elevator buttons, or railings8

    ► Limitation of family and friends visiting the hospital

    recommendations for outpatient clinics ► Minimize face- to- face appointments9

    ► Telephone/video consultations ► Maintaining ‘social distancing’ in outpatient waiting areas ► Adequate protection equipment

    recommendations for healthcare personnel safety ► Personal protection equipment whenever and wherever

    applicable ► Staff training in using personal protection equipment ► Staff training in the identification of suspected COVID patients ► Ensuring that staff have access to psychological support ► Reassignment of clinical duties to administrative roles for immu-

    nocompromised staff or those with significant co- morbidities10

    ► Strict ‘stay at home when ill’ policy10

    ► Improving awareness among professionals through regular webinars with a national and international presence to learn from others

    recommendations on inpatient management ► COVID designated wards/intensive care units/operating rooms/

    hospitals ► Blood bank balancing operating room transfusion needs with

    shortage of blood products due to a reduction in blood donation ► Pooling of resources such as shifting patients to COVID- free

    units/hospitals ► Restricting the number of visitors to ‘none’ or ‘single- only'In addition to changes in day- to- day practice relating to hospital

    visits and minimizing risk of infection, guidelines advise on prioriti-zation of treatment when faced with low capacity in intensive care units and staff absence due to COVID-19 infection. As COVID-19 has had a global effect these guidelines vary, with some countries and societies defining priorities and others providing various options.11

    surgical prioritizationThe general consensus is that elective surgery for benign indica-tions should cease during this pandemic.12 Recommendations for the surgical prioritization of gynecological cancer cases may be broadly divided into four main groups.7 9 12–17

    Priority level 11a Emergency required within 24 hours to save a life

    1b Urgent required

  • 1427Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    Table 2 Surgery: ovarian cancer

    1b7 or High62 27 or Medium62 3 or Low62

    Mechanical intestinal obstruction/impending perforation where lines of life- prolonging treatment exist.7

    Pelvic mass with torsion or causing urinary or intestinal obstruction35

    Malignant germ cell tumors in young patients should take priority. Complete staging procedure should be performed with nodal evaluation.49

    Image- guided/diagnostic laparoscopy for tissue biopsy/assess operability if high suspicion of cancer35

    Elective surgery with the expectation of cure to be performed within 4 weeks to save a life/prevent progression of disease beyond operabilityPriority- based on:

    ► Urgency of symptoms ► Complications ► Expected growth rate

    Primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer, particularly cell types unlikely to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (low grade serous, clear cell, or mucinous)16 35

    Presumed early- stage ovarian cancer based on adnexectomy: completion/staging surgery may be deferred for 1–2 months15

    Ovarian mass with adverse features but normal tumor markers: ideally operated on within 4 weeks but could be delayed following multidisciplinary tumor board discussion16

    Interval debulking surgerySecondary surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: patients should be managed with chemotherapy unless surgery would relieve symptoms7

    Pelvic masses following multidisciplinary tumor board discussion, including using MRI/International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ultrasound/Risk of Malignancy Index to decide on the likelihood of malignancy:

    ► Thought to be benign: can defer surgery for 3–6 months

    ► Risk of Malignancy Index

  • 1428 Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    Table 3 Chemotherapy: ovarian cancer

    High62 Medium62 Low62

    For advanced ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be preferred to primary cytoreductive surgery and be effective in delaying surgery and inpatient hospitalization7 14–16 Interval surgery may then follow if local capacity permits, or in some centers clinicians may consider continuing to six cycles to delay surgery7 15 51

    Patients should undergo at least two new cycles of chemotherapy after their surgery.15

    Test for Breast Cancer Antigen (BRCA) mutations, germline and somatic so that patients may access poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitorsPoly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors should be started at the end of chemotherapy, if possible, patients may access Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors before the opportunity for surgery arises7 16

    Consider the routine use of Filgrastim (granulocyte colony stimulating factor) to reduce the incidence of neutropenia in patients receiving combination therapy7

    Malignant germ cell tumors high priority if requiring chemotherapy49

    Chemotherapy for platinum- sensitive relapse should be considered for symptomatic patients and delayed where possible for asymptomatic patients7 16

    Chemotherapy for non- serous, non- endometrioid ovarian cancers and low- grade cancers offers limited benefit and adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients is of lower priority Consider hormonal therapy (letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen)7 8

    Maintenance bevacizumab used with caution as it has low survival benefit and may be associated with a higher risk of bowel perforation7

    Following up- front adjuvant chemotherapy; consideration may be given to oral maintenance therapy, such as PARPi, as maintenance intravenous therapy requires repeated visits to the hospital51,16

    Table 4 Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy: endometrial cancer

    1b7or High63 263or Medium7 363or Low7

    Surgery

    ► Hemorrhage7 63

    ► Peritonitis63

    ► Radiotherapy complications63

    ► (Fistula/perforation) ► Post- operative bleeding/ureteric injury63

    ► Hydatiform mole curettage or hysterectomy64

    ► High- risk or high- grade disease7

    ► Uterus confined disease63

    ► Grade 3 endometrioid/grade 2 p53 mutated/serous/carcinosarcoma/undifferentiated/clear cell16

    ► Known/suspicion of high- grade uterine sarcoma16

    ► Low- grade, early stage7

    ► Risk- reducing surgery in genetically predisposed63

    ► Complex atypical hyperplasia not controlled with hormonal therapy63

    ► Repair of asymptomatic fistula63

    ► Resection of slow growing central recurrence63

    Chemotherapy and radiotherapy

    ► Adjuvant treatment after curative intent surgery

    ► Priority to high- grade disease (including ovarian cancer, sarcomas, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, and type II endometrial cancers). Recurrent cancer patients with symp-toms needing urgent treatment or end of life discussion14

    ► Where possible, chemotherapy for platinum- sensitive relapse should be considered for symptomatic patients and delayed, if possible, for patients without symptoms or with small- volume disease unlikely to lead to significant pathophysiological complications in the next 3 months

    ► Utilization of chemotherapy regimens that will avoid frequent patient visits

    ► For patients with metastatic disease, treatment delays may lead to worsening performance status; however, chemotherapy for a platinum- resistant disease would be of low priority, particu-larly in the absence of symptoms; consideration should include how such delays may lead to admission for symptom palliation, which further stresses inpatient resources.10 Alternative strate-gies to manage symptoms should be considered

    For patients found to be COVID-19- positive, do not start chemo-therapy until their symptoms resolve±they test negative (depending on resources).16 Advance care planning discussions should be documented during discussions with patients. This should include goals of care and end- of- life care.36 When chemotherapy is offered,

    a decision should be made together with patients, counseling about the risks of delaying chemotherapy versus the risks of developing COVID-19 while on treatment.

    radiotherapyPrioritization for radiotherapy patients is based on principles similar to those in chemotherapy patients. Curative radiotherapy should be prioritized over adjuvant therapy for local disease control. Where adjuvant radiotherapy is likely to reduce local recurrence but not prolong survival, radiotherapy may be withheld following careful consideration and counseling.7 17 The recommendations are summarized below12 40 41:

    Priority level 1Rapidly growing tumors12 40

    ► Curative intent chemoradiotherapy ► Treatment already underway—external beam radiotherapy and

    brachytherapy combined treatment plan

    Priority level 2Urgent palliative radiotherapy12 40

    Priority level 3Less aggressive tumors12 40 on June 19, 2021 by guest. P

    rotected by copyright.http://ijgc.bm

    j.com/

    Int J Gynecol C

    ancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. Dow

    nloaded from

    http://ijgc.bmj.com/

  • 1429Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    ► Radiotherapy is the first- line definitive treatment ► Post- operative radiotherapy in known residual disease

    following surgery for rapidly growing tumors

    Priority level 4Palliative radiotherapy to reduce the burden on the healthcare service12 40

    Priority level 5Adjuvant radiotherapy following complete resection of disease (

  • 1430 Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    Figure 1 Pre- invasive cervical lesions.

    Table 5 Surgery: cervical cancer

    1b7or High56 27or Medium56 37or Low56

    ► Life- threatening hemorrhage with failed conservative measures, especially surgery likely curative7 56

    ► Peritonitis56

    ► Radiotherapy complications56 (fistula/perforation)

    ► Post- operative bleeding/ureteric injury56

    ► Early- stage (unspecified)7 51

    ► Stage 1A, 1B1–IIA: radical hysterectomy ± bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy + lymphadenectomy (level not specified)51 56

    ► Stage 1A: trachelectomy/hysterectomy ± sentinel lymph node sampling (postpone 2 months)51 56

    ► Low volume cervical cancer completely excised at loop excision7

    ► Cervical intra- epithelial neoplasia 3 conisation56

    ► Repair of asymptomatic fistula56

    ► Resection of slow growing central recurrence56

    ► Pelvic exenteration (consider postponing)56

    Brachytherapy is an essential component of the treatment for cervical cancer, with poorer outcomes resulting when it is not used. Brachytherapy should be prioritized whenever possible.17 41

    Vaginal cancerMost patients with vaginal cancer present at an advanced stage. Treatment is based around radiotherapy/chemotherapy/brachytherapy treatment. The added benefit of lymph node staging will be patient- dependent based on disease stage, location, and results of imaging investigations.15 For the majority of cases, prior-itization of treatment of vaginal cancer is as for cervical cancer.

    Vulvar cancerIf all surgery, including cancer surgery, is suspended or a patient is not suitable for surgery, radical radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the treatment of choice. Chemotherapy may be omitted for elderly patients or those with co- morbidities .41

    DIsCussIOn

    Restrictions imposed during lockdown,59 including advice over social distancing and self- isolation, have reduced access to health-care services. Many of the guidelines focus on limiting patient and staff interactions by limiting the number and length of clinical visits, and thus limiting exposure. Delays and non- standard treatment pathways will undoubtedly be resorted to. Delays could be detri-mental to patients' health and, in the worst cases, lead to wors-ening performance and missing the treatment window.10

    Multidisciplinary team outcomes should document what the standard of care is and how it has been modified due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When surgery is offered, a decision should be made together with patients, counseling about the risks of delaying surgery versus the risks of increased mortality and morbidity from developing COVID-19 peri- operatively in hospital. A supplementary consent form describing the increased mortality and morbidity

    on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

    http://ijgc.bmj.com

    /Int J G

    ynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. D

    ownloaded from

    http://ijgc.bmj.com/

  • 1431Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    Table 6 Chemotherapy and radiotherapy: cervical cancer

    High56 Medium56 Low56

    Chemotherapy

    ► Part of concurrent chemo- radiotherapy7 15 49

    ► Stage IB3, IIB- IVA: chemo- radiotherapy56

    ► Continuation of standard chemo- radiotherapy, with proven benefit56

    ► Consider neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with visible tumor49 51

    ► Stage IVB: first line, first central recurrence, >12 months disease- free56

    ► First recurrence with good performance status or advanced previous untreated disease (Priority 4*)7

    ► Metastatic disease (Priority 6†)7 49

    Radiotherapy: cervical cancer

    High15 Medium15 Low15

    ► Part of chemo- radiotherapy ‡7 15 49 56 ► Haemostatic radiotherapy7

    ► Salvage radiotherapy for symptomatic local recurrence56

    ► As adjuvant therapy in positive surgical margins7

    ► Palliation for unresectable, asymptomatic recurrence

    *Curative therapy with a low (0%–15%) chance of success or non- curative therapy with an intermediate (15%–50%) chance of >1 year life extension.†Non- curative therapy with an intermediate (15%–50%) chance of palliation/temporary tumor control and

  • 1432 Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    52/ 2020/ 03/ specialty- guide- acute- treatment- cancer- 23- march- 2020. pdf [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].

    13 Indian Association of Surgical Oncology. Updated IASO Covid-19/Curfew guidelines, 2020. Available: https:// iasoindia. in/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2020/ 03/ Official- IASO- COVID- 19- Guidelines. pdf [Accessed 27 Apr 2020].

    14 Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Gynecologic oncology considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https://www. sgo. org/ clinical- practice/ management/ covid- 19- resources- for- health- care- practitioners/ gyn- onc- considerations- during- covid- 19/ [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].

    15 Akladios C, Azais H, Ballester M, et al. Recommendations for the surgical management of gynecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic - FRANCOGYN group for the CNGOF. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020;49.

    16 Sebastianelli A, Plante M, Langlais E, et al. GOC position statement for the COVID-19 pandemic situation: treatment and management for women with gynecologic cancer, 2020. Available: http:// g- o- c. org/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2020/ 04/ 20GOC_ COVID- 19_ PositionStatement_ FINAL_ Apr7. pdf [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].

    17 Lee S- J, Kim T, Kim M, et al. Recommendations for gynecologic cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Gynecol Oncol 2020;31.

    18 Thomakos N, Pandraklakis A, Bisch SP, et al. ERAS protocols in gynecologic oncology during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:728–9.

    19 The European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups. ESGO- ENGAGe survey: perspective of gynecological cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemia, 2020. Available: https:// engage. esgo. org/ esgo- engage- survey- perspective- gynecological- cancer- patients- covid- 19- pandemia [Accessed 26 May 2020].

    20 British Gynaecological Cancer Society. Lay summary of BGCS framework for care of women with gynaecological cancers during COVID pandemic 2020. Available: https://www. bgcs. org. uk/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2020/ 03/ Lay- summary- of- BGCS- framework- for- care- of- women- with- gynaecological- cancers- during- covid- pandemic. pdf [Accessed 26 May 2020].

    21 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/The British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy. Joint RCOG/BSGE statement on gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and COVID-19, 2020. Available: https:// mk0britishsociep8d9m. kinstacdn. com/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2020/ 03/ Joint- RCOG- BSGE- Statement- on- gynaecological- laparoscopic- procedures- and- COVID- 19. pdf [Accessed 27 Apr 20].

    22 Diettrich NA, Kaplan G. Laparoscopic surgery for HIV- infected patients: minimizing dangers for all concerned. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1:295–8.

    23 Capizzi PJ, Clay RP, Battey MJ. Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris. Lasers Surg Med 1998;23:172–4.

    24 Gloster HM, Roenigk RK. Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:436–41.

    25 Calero L, Brusis T. [Laryngeal papillomatosis - first recognition in Germany as an occupational disease in an operating room nurse]. Laryngorhinootologie 2003;82:790–3.

    26 Hallmo P, Naess O. Laryngeal papillomatosis with human papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991;248:425–7.

    27 Rioux M, Garland A, Webster D, et al. HPV positive tonsillar cancer in two laser surgeons: case reports. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42.

    28 Johnson GK, Robinson WS. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) in the vapors of surgical power instruments. J Med Virol 1991;33:47–50.

    29 Indian Association of Gynaecological Endoscopists. Good clinical practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https:// iageguidelines. blogspot. com/ 2020/ 04/ in- current- covid- 19- pandemic- whether- to. html [Accessed 27 Apr 20].

    30 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons/European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. SAGES and EAES recommendations regarding surgical response to COVID-19, 2020. Available: https://www. sages. org/ recommendations- surgical- response- covid- 19/ [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    31 Kimmig R, Verheijen RHM, Rudnicki M, et al. Robot assisted surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for gynecological cancer: a statement of the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). J Gynecol Oncol 2020;31:e59.

    32 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. COVID-19: joint statement on minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, 2020. Available: https://www. aagl. org/ news/ covid- 19- joint- statement- on- minimally- invasive- gynecologic- surgery/ [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    33 Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain & Ireland. Laparoscopy in the Covid-19 environment: ALSGBI position statement (conventional and robotic), 2020. Available: https://www. alsgbi. org/ 2020/ 04/ 22/ laparoscopy- in- the- covid- 19- environment- alsgbi- position- statement/ [Accessed 03 May 2020].

    34 Mintz Y, Arezzo A, Boni L, et al. A low cost, safe and effective method for smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery for suspected coronavirus patients. Ann Surg 2020. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003965. [Epub ahead of print: 13 Apr 2020].

    35 Dowdy S, Fader AN. Surgical considerations for gynecologic oncologists during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https://www. sgo. org/ wp- content/ uploads/ 2020/ 03/ Surgical_ Considerations_ Communique. v14. pdf [Accessed 25 Apr 2020].

    36 Marron JM, Joffe S, Jagsi R, Spence RA, et al. Ethics and resource scarcity: ASCO recommendations for the oncology community during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Oncol 2020.

    37 Newton C, Nordin A, Rolland P, et al. British Gynaecological Cancer Society recommendations and guidance on patient- initiated follow- up (PIFU). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:695–700.

    38 Pramesh CS, Badwe RA. Cancer management in India during Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e61.

    39 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: delivery of systemic anticancer treatments 2020. Available: https://www. nice. org. uk/ guidance/ ng161/ resources/ covid19- rapid- guideline- delivery- of- systemic- anticancer- treatments- pdf- 66141895710661 [Accessed 27 Apr 2020].

    40 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE guideline [NG162] COVID-19 rapid guideline: delivery of radiotherapy, 2020. Available: https://www. nice. org. uk/ guidance/ ng162/ resources/ covid19- rapid- guideline- delivery- of- radiotherapy- pdf- 66141897390277 [Accessed 3 May 2020].

    41 Cooper RTA. Proposed guidance for radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer and COVID-19, 2020. Available: https://www. rcr. ac. uk/ sites/ default/ files/ gynae- cancer- treatment- covid19. pdf [Accessed 3 May 2020].

    42 The European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology. "Radiotherapy in a time of crisis", ESTRO Presidents' statement, 2020. Available: https://www. estro. org/ About/ Newsroom/ News/ Radiotherapy- in- a- time- of- crisis [Accessed 27 Apr 20].

    43 American Brachytherapy Society. ABS statement on coronavirus, 2020. Available: https://www. amer ican brac hyth erapy. org/ about- abs/ abs- news/ abs- statement- on- coronavirus/ [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    44 Pezzulla D, Macchia G, Taccari F, et al. Radiotherapy in southern Italy at the time of COVID-19: options for radiation oncology units. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:917–9.

    45 European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups. ENGOT recommendations on conduct clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https:// engot. esgo. org/ media/ 2020/ 03/ ENGOT- GUIDANCE- ON- CONDUCT- CLINICAL- TRIALS- DURING- THE- COVID- V1. 1. pdf [Accessed 27 Apr 2020].

    46 Danish Medicines Agency. Extraordinary measures for clinical trials due to COVID-19, 2020. Available: https:// laegemiddelstyrelsen. dk/ en/ search/~/ media/ 4620 3FAB 86DE 42F2 B735 D7A1 3CADA1FE. ashx [Accessed 28 Apr 20].

    47 Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group. ANZGOG and COVID-19: 31 March 2020 Statement, 2020. Available: https://www. anzgog. org. au/ anzgog- covid- 19/

    48 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. FDA guidance on conduct of clinical trials of medical products during COVID-19 public health emergency, 2020. Available: https://www. fda. gov/ media/ 136238/ download [Accessed 28 Apr 2020].

    49 Pothuri B, Alvarez Secord A, Armstrong DK, et al. Anti- cancer therapy and clinical trial considerations for gynecologic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Gynecol Oncol 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.694. [Epub ahead of print: 23 Apr 2020].

    50 COVID-19: global consequences for oncology. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:467.

    51 Ramirez PT, Chiva L, Eriksson AGZ, et al. COVID-19 global pandemic: options for management of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:561–3.

    52 Royal College of Radiologists. Royal College of Radiologists radiotherapy dose fractionation, Third edition: Cervix cancer, 2019. Available: https://www. rcr. ac. uk/ system/ files/ publication/ field_ publication_ files/ bfco193_ radiotherapy_ dose_ fractionation_ third- edition- gynaecological- cancers_ 0. pdf [Accessed 3 May 2020].

    53 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. NHS cervical screening programme: Colposcopy initial guidance during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, 2020. Available: https://www. bsccp. org. uk/ assets/ file/ uploads/ resources/ 0_ PHE_% 28England%

    on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

    http://ijgc.bmj.com

    /Int J G

    ynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. D

    ownloaded from

    https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/specialty-guide-acute-treatment-cancer-23-march-2020.pdfhttps://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/specialty-guide-acute-treatment-cancer-23-march-2020.pdfhttps://iasoindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Official-IASO-COVID-19-Guidelines.pdfhttps://iasoindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Official-IASO-COVID-19-Guidelines.pdfhttps://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/management/covid-19-resources-for-health-care-practitioners/gyn-onc-considerations-during-covid-19/https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/management/covid-19-resources-for-health-care-practitioners/gyn-onc-considerations-during-covid-19/https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/management/covid-19-resources-for-health-care-practitioners/gyn-onc-considerations-during-covid-19/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101729http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101729http://g-o-c.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20GOC_COVID-19_PositionStatement_FINAL_Apr7.pdfhttp://g-o-c.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20GOC_COVID-19_PositionStatement_FINAL_Apr7.pdfhttp://g-o-c.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20GOC_COVID-19_PositionStatement_FINAL_Apr7.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001439http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001439https://engage.esgo.org/esgo-engage-survey-perspective-gynecological-cancer-patients-covid-19-pandemiahttps://engage.esgo.org/esgo-engage-survey-perspective-gynecological-cancer-patients-covid-19-pandemiahttps://engage.esgo.org/esgo-engage-survey-perspective-gynecological-cancer-patients-covid-19-pandemiahttps://www.bgcs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Lay-summary-of-BGCS-framework-for-care-of-women-with-gynaecological-cancers-during-covid-pandemic.pdfhttps://www.bgcs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Lay-summary-of-BGCS-framework-for-care-of-women-with-gynaecological-cancers-during-covid-pandemic.pdfhttps://www.bgcs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Lay-summary-of-BGCS-framework-for-care-of-women-with-gynaecological-cancers-during-covid-pandemic.pdfhttps://www.bgcs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Lay-summary-of-BGCS-framework-for-care-of-women-with-gynaecological-cancers-during-covid-pandemic.pdfhttps://mk0britishsociep8d9m.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Joint-RCOG-BSGE-Statement-on-gynaecological-laparoscopic-procedures-and-COVID-19.pdfhttps://mk0britishsociep8d9m.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Joint-RCOG-BSGE-Statement-on-gynaecological-laparoscopic-procedures-and-COVID-19.pdfhttps://mk0britishsociep8d9m.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Joint-RCOG-BSGE-Statement-on-gynaecological-laparoscopic-procedures-and-COVID-19.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lps.1991.1.295http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)23:33.0.CO;2-Mhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(95)90065-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44546http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01463570http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01463570http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-42-54http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.1890330110https://iageguidelines.blogspot.com/2020/04/in-current-covid-19-pandemic-whether-to.htmlhttps://iageguidelines.blogspot.com/2020/04/in-current-covid-19-pandemic-whether-to.htmlhttps://www.sages.org/recommendations-surgical-response-covid-19/https://www.sages.org/recommendations-surgical-response-covid-19/http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e59https://www.aagl.org/news/covid-19-joint-statement-on-minimally-invasive-gynecologic-surgery/https://www.aagl.org/news/covid-19-joint-statement-on-minimally-invasive-gynecologic-surgery/https://www.alsgbi.org/2020/04/22/laparoscopy-in-the-covid-19-environment-alsgbi-position-statement/https://www.alsgbi.org/2020/04/22/laparoscopy-in-the-covid-19-environment-alsgbi-position-statement/https://www.alsgbi.org/2020/04/22/laparoscopy-in-the-covid-19-environment-alsgbi-position-statement/http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003965https://www.sgo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Surgical_Considerations_Communique.v14.pdfhttps://www.sgo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Surgical_Considerations_Communique.v14.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00960http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-001176http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2011595https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-systemic-anticancer-treatments-pdf-66141895710661https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-systemic-anticancer-treatments-pdf-66141895710661https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-systemic-anticancer-treatments-pdf-66141895710661https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng162/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-radiotherapy-pdf-66141897390277https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng162/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-radiotherapy-pdf-66141897390277https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng162/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-delivery-of-radiotherapy-pdf-66141897390277https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gynae-cancer-treatment-covid19.pdfhttps://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gynae-cancer-treatment-covid19.pdfhttps://www.estro.org/About/Newsroom/News/Radiotherapy-in-a-time-of-crisishttps://www.estro.org/About/Newsroom/News/Radiotherapy-in-a-time-of-crisishttps://www.americanbrachytherapy.org/about-abs/abs-news/abs-statement-on-coronavirus/https://www.americanbrachytherapy.org/about-abs/abs-news/abs-statement-on-coronavirus/http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001523https://engot.esgo.org/media/2020/03/ENGOT-GUIDANCE-ON-CONDUCT-CLINICAL-TRIALS-DURING-THE-COVID-V1.1.pdfhttps://engot.esgo.org/media/2020/03/ENGOT-GUIDANCE-ON-CONDUCT-CLINICAL-TRIALS-DURING-THE-COVID-V1.1.pdfhttps://engot.esgo.org/media/2020/03/ENGOT-GUIDANCE-ON-CONDUCT-CLINICAL-TRIALS-DURING-THE-COVID-V1.1.pdfhttps://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/en/search/~/media/46203FAB86DE42F2B735D7A13CADA1FE.ashxhttps://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/en/search/~/media/46203FAB86DE42F2B735D7A13CADA1FE.ashxhttps://www.anzgog.org.au/anzgog-covid-19/https://www.anzgog.org.au/anzgog-covid-19/https://www.fda.gov/media/136238/downloadhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.694http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30175-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001419http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001419https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfco193_radiotherapy_dose_fractionation_third-edition-gynaecological-cancers_0.pdfhttps://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfco193_radiotherapy_dose_fractionation_third-edition-gynaecological-cancers_0.pdfhttps://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfco193_radiotherapy_dose_fractionation_third-edition-gynaecological-cancers_0.pdfhttps://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/0_PHE_%28England%29_Guidance_for_Colposcopy_Service_Providers_V1_0.pdfhttps://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/0_PHE_%28England%29_Guidance_for_Colposcopy_Service_Providers_V1_0.pdfhttp://ijgc.bmj.com/

  • 1433Uwins C, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1424–1433. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634

    Review

    29_ Guidance_ for_ Colposcopy_ Service_ Providers_ V1_ 0. pdf [Accessed 3 May 2020].

    54 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Colposcopy guidance during COVID 19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https://www. bsccp. org. uk/ assets/ file/ uploads/ resources/ Colposcopy_ guidance__ COVID_ 19_ pandemic. V3. pdf [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    55 Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, et al. Expert consensus from the Italian Society for Colposcopy and Cervico- Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV) for colposcopy and outpatient surgery of the lower genital tract during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;149:269–72.

    56 European Society for Medical Oncology. ESMO management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: cervical cancer, 2020. Available: https://www. esmo. org/ guidelines/ cancer- patient- management- during- the- covid- 19- pandemic/ gynaecological- malignancies- cervical- cancer- in- the- covid- 19- era [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    57 Cibula D, Gultekin M, McCormack M, et al. Management of cervical cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Available: https:// eacademy. esgo. org/ esgo/ 2020/ covid- 19/ 298855/ david. cibula. murat. gultekin. mary. mccormack. domenica. lorusso. pedro. ramirez. html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label= 19832*featured=16722 [Accessed 25 May 2020].

    58 Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, et al. European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) joint considerations about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, screening programs, colposcopy, and surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001617. [Epub ahead of print: 02 Jun 2020].

    59 Di Marzo F, Sartelli M, Cennamo R, et al. Recommendations for general surgery activities in a pandemic scenario (SARS- CoV-2). Br J Surg 2020. doi:10.1002/bjs.11652. [Epub ahead of print: 23 Apr 2020].

    60 American College of Surgeons. COVID 19: elective case triage guidelines for surgical care, 2020. Available: https://www. facs. org/-/ media/ files/ covid19/ guidance_ for_ triage_ of_ nonemergent_ surgical_ procedures_ cancer_ surgery. ashx [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    61 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. A message from the ESGO and ENGOT Leadership in the era of COVID-19: Supporting gynaecological oncology professionals with practical advice for the management of patients and clinical trials, 2020. Available: https://www. esgo. org/ esgo- engot- leadership- statement/

    62 European Society for Medical Oncology. ESMO management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: epithelial ovarian cancer, 2020. Available: https://www. esmo. org/ guidelines/ cancer- patient- management- during- the- covid- 19- pandemic/ gynaecological- malignancies- epithelial- ovarian- cancer- in- the- covid- 19- era [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].

    63 European Society for Medical Oncology. ESMO management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: endometrial cancer, 2020. Available: https://www. esmo. org/ guidelines/ cancer- patient- management- during- the- covid- 19- pandemic/ gynaecological- malignancies- endometrial- cancer- in- the- covid- 19- era [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    64 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. ASCCP interim guidance for timing of diagnostic and treatment procedures for patients with abnormal cervical screening tests, 2020. Available: https://www. asccp. org/ covid- 19 [Accessed 27 May 2020].

    on June 19, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.

    http://ijgc.bmj.com

    /Int J G

    ynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001634 on 23 June 2020. D

    ownloaded from

    https://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/0_PHE_%28England%29_Guidance_for_Colposcopy_Service_Providers_V1_0.pdfhttps://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/Colposcopy_guidance__COVID_19_pandemic.V3.pdfhttps://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/Colposcopy_guidance__COVID_19_pandemic.V3.pdfhttps://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/Colposcopy_guidance__COVID_19_pandemic.V3.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13158http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13158https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-cervical-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-cervical-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-cervical-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://eacademy.esgo.org/esgo/2020/covid-19/298855/david.cibula.murat.gultekin.mary.mccormack.domenica.lorusso.pedro.ramirez.html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label=19832*featured=16722https://eacademy.esgo.org/esgo/2020/covid-19/298855/david.cibula.murat.gultekin.mary.mccormack.domenica.lorusso.pedro.ramirez.html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label=19832*featured=16722https://eacademy.esgo.org/esgo/2020/covid-19/298855/david.cibula.murat.gultekin.mary.mccormack.domenica.lorusso.pedro.ramirez.html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label=19832*featured=16722https://eacademy.esgo.org/esgo/2020/covid-19/298855/david.cibula.murat.gultekin.mary.mccormack.domenica.lorusso.pedro.ramirez.html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label=19832*featured=16722https://eacademy.esgo.org/esgo/2020/covid-19/298855/david.cibula.murat.gultekin.mary.mccormack.domenica.lorusso.pedro.ramirez.html?f=listing=3*browseby=8*sortby=2*media=1*label=19832*featured=16722http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001617http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11652http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11652https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/covid19/guidance_for_triage_of_nonemergent_surgical_procedures_cancer_surgery.ashxhttps://www.facs.org/-/media/files/covid19/guidance_for_triage_of_nonemergent_surgical_procedures_cancer_surgery.ashxhttps://www.facs.org/-/media/files/covid19/guidance_for_triage_of_nonemergent_surgical_procedures_cancer_surgery.ashxhttps://www.esgo.org/esgo-engot-leadership-statement/https://www.esgo.org/esgo-engot-leadership-statement/https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-epithelial-ovarian-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-epithelial-ovarian-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-epithelial-ovarian-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-epithelial-ovarian-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-endometrial-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-endometrial-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-endometrial-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/gynaecological-malignancies-endometrial-cancer-in-the-covid-19-erahttps://www.asccp.org/covid-19http://ijgc.bmj.com/

    Anaphylaxis management: a survey of school and day care nurses in LebanonAbstractMethodsDesignPopulationInstrumentData collectionStatistical analyses

    ResultsStudy population characteristicsCurrent policies, processes and training sessionsPrevious experience in the management of anaphylaxis reaction

    COVID-19 and gynecological cancer: a review of the published guidelinesAbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsEvolution of the guidelinesRecommendations on reduction of infection rateRecommendations for outpatient clinicsRecommendations for healthcare personnel safetyRecommendations on inpatient managementSurgical prioritizationPriority level 1Priority level 2Priority level 3

    Patient perspectivesMinimally invasive surgeryOncological treatment guidelinesChemotherapyRadiotherapyPriority level 1Priority level 2Priority level 3Priority level 4Priority level 5

    Other measuresClinical trialsOvarian cancerEndometrial cancerLow riskHigh risk

    Gestational trophoblastic neoplasiaPre-invasive cervical diseaseCervical cancerVaginal cancerVulvar cancer

    DiscussionReferences