SCB 12204 THERMAL SCIENCELAB REPORT

Criteria Unacceptable (1)

Acceptable (3) Good (5) Score Weight Total Marks

1. General content- Title- Objectives- Apparatus- Procedures

Meet less than two of the good criteria.

Meet three of the good criteria.

Excellent explanation and description of:- Title- Objectives- Apparatus- Procedures

2

2. Data tabulated in a neatly manner

Table of data is messy and unclear

Tabulated data is reasonably neat, but still unclear

Tabulated data is prepared in a neat and clear manner

2

3. Analysis Wrong analysis has been done

Analysis is right but did not clearly demonstrated

Analysis is right and clearly demonstrated

4

4. Results (graphs)

Graphs were not neatly prepared, no labels, titles

Graphs were prepared in a reasonably neat manner,

Graphs were neatly preparedCorrect labelCorrect title

4

5. Answers to the questions

Explanation did not make any sense

Explanation is logical but some areas required further clarification

Explanation is logical and clearly answered all the post-lab questions

6

6. Overall report Unacceptable usage of English and no effort was made to prepare the report’s readability.

Acceptable usage of English and report is observed to be prepared with average effort.

Excellent usage of English and report is neatly prepared and organized.

2

TOTAL MARKS (100)

CB 12204 THERMAL SCIENCELAB PRESENTATION MARKING RUBRICGROUP : ________________________________

Group Assessment Rating:

3 – all criteria are met2 – only two criteria are met

1 – only one criteria is met0 - none of the criteria is met

Criteria Rating awardedEXPERIMENT #1 EXPERIMENT #2

STUDENT ID: 54269113671

STUDENT’S NAME: AHMAD HARIEZ FUZEIN B. MOHD RUSHDY

EXPERIMENT NO. : EXPERIMENT 1 – Saturation Vapor Pressure

………………………………………………………….

Introduction 1. Provide title2. Provide direct objectives3. Mention other inherent objectives

Equipment & Tools

1. Provide the name of the equipment2. Show images of the equipment3. Describe the equipment and tools used

Data collection & tabulation

1. Collected data is well presented and organized in a table.2. Results and data are clearly recorded, organized so it is easy to

see trends.3. All appropriate labels are included

Results & Discussions

1. Described the calculations done.2. Correct method of analysis is used.3. Clearly explain the answers to the post-lab questions

Conclusions 1. Described conclusions from the experiment2. Provide insightful remarks3. Provide limitations

Presentation Style

1. Organization – slides, data, table, graphs and pictures are organized

2. Preparedness3. Visual

Q & A 1. Ability to respond to questions2. Knowledgeable in answering questions3. Answers logical and make sense

SUBTOTAL (21)

TOTAL (42)TOTAL (2%)

Individual Assessment (3%) – rate between 1 to 5

Name Eye Contact Body Language /

Poise

Elocution / Pronunciation

Subject Knowledge

Total Marks (20)

Total Marks (3%)

Signature:

Date: